web
counter
 

The Logistics of Sex in Spaaaaaace!

By Dr. Pisaster | Posted Under Pajiba Dirty Talk | Comments (29)



sex_in_space.jpg

Last week a reader sent me a suggestion inspired by an episode of The Universe about sex in space.And then this article from last November’s Journal of Cosmonology by Rhawn Joseph was unearthed and reported on by several websites. I’m kinda lazy, so when a topic falls in my lap like that I’m not about to say no. The Cosmonology article is not, sadly, an in depth scientific study of the effect of space travel on all things sexual. No such study has been performed, as NASA hasn’t done any official experiments on the topic. It’s actually just a scientist geeking out about the possibility of astronauts having sex during long missions and discussing various complications and issues that could arise, physically and emotionally, from coupling in the unique atmosphere of a space ship. As a professor of brain research, the author seems especially interested in the psychological effects. (And he’s an emeritus professor, which means “old,” which in this case also seems to mean “cringe-inducingly sexist.” Just a warning if you decide to read the article.) I’d rather not just recap someone else’s scientific editorial, so if you’ll excuse me, I’m going to geek out about sex in space with respect to my personal fields of expertise - physics and biology.

There is a school of thought that states that because the constants of the universe are exactly as they need to be for human life to exist, human existence must therefore be the purpose of the universe. It makes more sense, however, to assume that humans are built the way we are because we came into existence within the context of that specific set of universal rules. And on a more local level, we evolved specifically to fit the conditions of this particular planet, Earth. That means that our bodies, our bones and muscles and circulatory systems, all of it, evolved to operate under a constant gravitational force of roughly 9.8 N/kg. The mechanics of sex as with all human activity, are designed to accommodate this downward force. The most obvious difficulty with having sex in space, where gravity is almost zero, therefore, is that minus this force things become a little complicated. The first problem is summed up by Newton’s first law of motion: an object in motion will stay in motion unless acted on by an outside force. Without gravity to hold you down, any movement in space will propel you in the initial direction of that movement until you hit something solid - most likely a wall. Another human being isn’t gonna cut it - thrust into your partner in zero gravity and you’ll both be propelled forward. The in-and-out motion of sex becomes pretty complicated when every thrust either pushes you and your partner across the room or sends one of you shooting upwards toward the ceiling. (Horizontal motion won’t save you, either. What holds you in place normally in that case is friction, and frictional force is a function of the roughness of the surface you’re on and the force with which you press against that surface. No gravity=no friction.) There are several possible ways to get around this particular problem. The most obvious is to utilize something like handlebars to hold yourself in place. Of course that means you won’t have your hands free to stimulate your partner, which kind of sucks. Another option would be a mechanism to hold your body down without requiring you to actively restrain yourself - some sort of Velcro or magnetic apparatus that you would have to strap on. (“Hold on baby, just let me put on my thigh high leather mag-boots…”) Having sex in a very small space where your motion is limited to the range you actually want to move in is also a possibility, although it doesn’t sound like a very comfortable one. Regardless, there’s always going to be a lack of gravity, and as I said before, the way we move is entirely dependent on the presence of this external force. You’d be surprised how much you rely on gravity. Our muscles automatically take into account the opposing force when we move upward and tend to use it to assist us when we move downward. Basically, if you’re on top of your partner, you exert force to push yourself up but require less effort to move back down. In space, the muscular actions required to perform the same motion would likely be different. I’m sure, horny and adaptable creatures that we are, that we’d get used to it, but it would definitely be an adjustment.

There is also the question of how human bodies react to prolonged exposure to microgravity and radiation found in space. There is some evidence that space travel affects hormonal levels. Male astronauts have been found to have lowered testosterone levels, for instance. It isn’t known how space travel affects other aspects of sexual organs, such as semen production and lubrication. Hopefully the effects would be negligible - opening up a bottle of lube in zero gravity could get messy. And for obvious reasons, the pullout method is probably not the best of ideas. (It is, however, a good idea to use some form of birth control, since the effects of space travel on pregnancy would probably be disastrous) Unfortunately, it’s unlikely that we’ll know the answers to these questions anytime soon. As far as we know, no one has yet had sex in space. (Although there is speculation that one pair of married astronauts who were on a mission together might have, but they aren’t talking). NASA discourages copulation between astronauts while on a mission but takes a blind-eye approach to the subject, so they aren’t likely to perform any studies on the subject. It’s more likely that if it happens, it’ll happen during commercial space travel, and instead of scientific data we’ll be left with anecdotes.


Dr. Pisaster has a doctorate in biophysics, not actually anything sexy. She does however enjoy having sex, reading about sex, and talking about sex. Especially when she’s had a little whiskey.










Each Time You Like, Share, Tweet or Stumble a Pajiba Post, An Angel Does the Paul Rudd Dance



MTV's "Skins" Review | What's the Cockney Translation for "Wrecking Ball of Dumbassery"? | Behind the Hatred There Lies a Murderous Desire for Love | IFC Films Nabs Brighton Rock









Comments

Didn't the Russians already send a couple into space to have sex, and the woman gave birth 9 months later? Or is my memory failing me?

Anyway, I require a great deal of pressure to get off, so zero gravity sex is out for me.

And now for something completely different:

Dr. P., I read in my local paper today that some men are allergic to their own semen.

By By Thomas H. Maugh II, Los Angeles Times

Some poor men are apparently allergic to their own semen, developing a mysterious flu-like illness after they have an ejaculation, Dutch researchers reported Monday. The condition, known as post-orgasmic illness syndrome or POIS, has been documented since 2002. Symptoms include feverishness, runny nose, extreme fatigue and burning eyes, which can last for up to a week. Some physicians had suggested that the disorder was psychosomatic, but Marcel Waldinger, a professor of sexual psychopharmacology at Utrecht University in the Netherlands, and his colleagues demonstrated in two papers in the Journal of Sexual Medicine that the syndrome was allergic in nature and that it might be possible to desensitize men to the problem. (They did this by injecting the men with dilute versions of their own semen.)

Posted by: BWeaves at January 18, 2011 4:19 PM

Two words: Bungee cords.

Posted by: Groundloop at January 18, 2011 4:20 PM

Space and sex are both awesome, so bravo. One small caveat: there would still be friction between a body and the surrounding air, but it's effects would be negligible.

Posted by: The_wakeful at January 18, 2011 4:23 PM

I used to work with someone who was involved with a project that put pregnant rats in space.

Turns out embryos use gravity as one of the cues for early patterning. If you're in microgravity at this time, the embryo is screwed.

Similarly, going up later also presents problems for things like inner ear formation and possible certain mapping functions.

Having babies in microgravity will be massively problematic, at the least. As you said, Dr. P, we evolved with a constant gravitational force. It's expected, and therefore exploited.

Posted by: ZombieScientist at January 18, 2011 4:28 PM

Wow. That article is sort of old school, wot?

Not entirely his fault. A lot of the literature in that area is either a little behind the times or amazingly blunt about things that our culture doesn't really like to talk about. Still, he could have made some effort to sound less 1970s.

Plus, I'm not even an expert in the area and I know he's missing some relevant citations on pregnancy.

Posted by: ZombieScientist at January 18, 2011 4:36 PM

So far, all of my applications to NASA volunteering myself for sex experimentation and engineering in space have been rejected, but one can hope.

I honestly don't think sex in space would be all that difficult. I'm confident I could make it work. Gotta watch out for those fluids, though.

Posted by: logar at January 18, 2011 4:48 PM

I can't speak to sex in space, yet, but as someone who has made use of various pools, hot tubs, lakes and oceans I can tell you that you are over-thinking this.

Being weightless gives you so many more options, actually; more positions, less physical effort, less rug burn...

Just give me some velcro, a leash and a long board.

Posted by: L.O.V.E. at January 18, 2011 4:51 PM

This is kinda related, but I remember hearing on the radio that bladders get really messed up in zero gravity -- because usually, we depend on the bladder expanding to a certain amount to let us know when it's time to pee, but in null gravity, liquids evenly spread around the inside surface of the bladder rather than filling up normally, so that you don't get that "urge" until you're so full you piss yourself. So they have to set timers and things to tell them when to pee, because they don't know otherwise.

Okay, maybe it's not that related, but hey, it's SPACE. Maybe that applies a little more to pregnancy than the process of getting pregnant.

Posted by: linny at January 18, 2011 5:07 PM

"Moreover, the human female has evolved the cognitive and intellectual capacity to employ cosmetics, perfumes, colorful clothing, push up bras, high heels, and so on, which draw attention to her breasts and derriere, and which emphasize and exaggerate her sexual availability by mimicking the signs of estrus common in other social primates (Joseph 2000a,b)."

This is simply magnificent stuff. The first pseudo-intellectual article I've ever read which includes the phrase "potpourri of pussy."

Posted by: Salieri2 at January 18, 2011 5:08 PM

Thanks for the fun read (great title). Outer space sex is not in my future, but it's fun to imagine its implications for the future should humanity survive and be forced into upward diaspora. Those sexy folks on the Enterprise, Serenity, Millennium Falcon, etc., certainly had it easy with their artificial gravity.

Posted by: DarthCorleone at January 18, 2011 5:14 PM

I prefer that pussy doesn't smell of potpouri. I'm more of a natural scent man, myself.

Posted by: L.O.V.E. at January 18, 2011 5:20 PM

On the other hand childbirth in a Zero Gravity environment might be equally less strenuous and messy if the Skylab footage has any validity. All the bodily fluids just floating around in neat little globular spheroids just waiting to be vacuumed away. I've been told women giving birth while floating in water have an easier time of things, (either that or it's just more hippie new-age propaganda)

Then again you'd probably have to station people at every conceivable corner of the cabin because when that kid comes out, he's going like a jet propelled paddle-ball. To say nothing of the placenta a few minutes later. Or baby's first movements. Or Zero-G breastfeeding.

Wow...It's a good thing I don't do recreational drugs while thinking about these sorts of things or I could REALLY spook myself.

Posted by: bleujayone at January 18, 2011 5:24 PM

1) Haven't read it, but doesn't Mary Roach's "Bonk" have a chapter on this?

2) Seems to me there could be some fun if you are decently flexible. I'm thinking, man behind, intertwines his legs with the womans, and just small thrusts without pulling out? (I kind of like that activity) and one arm could be wrapped around waist, leaving other hand free for stimulation, and woman's arms to hold something to keep them somewhat locked in place?

I admit, it's more novelty than out-and-out hot, but still seems fun.

Posted by: Sara Tonin at January 18, 2011 5:46 PM

Worst case scenario you get banged up a little as you propel yourself around the shuttle. (double entendre?) I've had worse with regular gravity sex. I say count me in.

Posted by: Blank at January 18, 2011 6:06 PM

Well, she would have to swallow at least

Posted by: Ari at January 18, 2011 6:21 PM

Loved this article and your nerdsome speculations.

Posted by: Figgy at January 18, 2011 6:29 PM

Only on Pajiba could an essay about fucking be this nerded-up.

Posted by: Jerce at January 18, 2011 6:57 PM

Huh.

I put "sex in space" together with "Geek" and assumed you were doing a review of the Season 8 Buffy comics.

Posted by: Foxeye at January 18, 2011 7:07 PM

I've wondered about this since reading Doug Coupland's All Families are Psychotic (which I'm stunned hasn't been made into a film already, though it's been optioned). Imagine all the tail you'd get for being the first baby conceived in spaaaaace.

Although the prospect of having some gorgeous guy balling the crap out of you in zero-G is exciting to say the least, I can't help but think about the constant bouncing off the walls like a goddamn Windows 95 screen saver... that never occurred to me!

Posted by: seed at January 18, 2011 7:52 PM

Who said "I am the Way, the Truth and the Life. No one comes to the Father but by me?" Where are you headed after THIS life? Shouldn't that concern You on the eve of 2012, the prophesied End of Days? TTC

Posted by: Burton Haynes at January 18, 2011 10:01 PM

I think I didn't convey as strongly as I intended to the effect that gravity has on the way our muscles work. It's not just that you'd be bouncing around; you'd probably have to move your body in completely unfamiliar ways to compensate for its lack.

Burton Haynes, I think it is clear that I'll be spending the next life burning with the rest of the sinners. Which is cool. They're better company and I'm a sexual masochist anyway.

Posted by: dr. pisaster at January 18, 2011 11:01 PM

Uhoh, spambot got some Jesus up in this bitch...

Posted by: Patty O'Green at January 18, 2011 11:23 PM

I, for one, hope that 2012 proves to be the End of Days and all the idiots get raptured up and leave the rest of us in peace. kthxbai.

As for sex in space, um, I don't know... Your point is taken that one's body would have to move in totally unfamiliar ways. Since I can't imagine what I can't imagine, I guess I'll have to wait until we totally exhaust the Earth and are colonizing Mars or something, and space travel becomes routine, and then become part of the million-mile-high club. Except by that point I'll be old and wrinkly and gross. Who am I kidding? I'm 75% of the way there already.

Stream of consciousness much?

Posted by: MM at January 19, 2011 12:04 AM

Bweaves, I'd love to think there was a little Russian Cosmobaby out there somewhere, but wouldn't Zero Gravity have an affect the actual process of impregnation? I mean if they have gravity somehow then sure but if not? I dont think they could make a CosmoBaby (CosmoBaby is different from Star Child. He keeps it lower key, he's more chilled out. Also he's Russian)

I dont know how gravity works but presumably the stuff inside you doesn't have it's own gravity, so it probably moves around a little bit too? I mean obviously your organs are attached, and attached quite snugly so wouldn't move too much.
But something 'free floating' like eggs and sperm, which have a hard enough time hooking up as it is, would find it impossible to make contact, surely?
Even if you guys had somehow...fixed yourself in position, like, one was velcroed to a wall and the other one was velocroed to their sexual partner, that doesn't stop all your...genetic materials inside you from just freaking the fuck out. Does it?

Posted by: Nadine at January 19, 2011 4:13 AM

dr. pisaster, I'll see you in hell - and I meant that in the best possible way. We'll be the ones lounging by the lava pool sipping molten cocktails and checking out the new arrivals ("Hey isn't that the guy from Jersey Shore?" "There goes the neighbourhood!")

Posted by: cinekat at January 19, 2011 10:32 AM

And on a more serious note: have always wanted to try zero gravity sex. Well-timed and coordinated 69 would definitely work, but I can think of a few other posi...
I wish "bunk" weren't so passe. Am now signing off rather abrup

Posted by: cinekat at January 19, 2011 10:34 AM

Geez, I'd be happy just to get into the (1) Mile High Club.

Posted by: , at January 19, 2011 10:45 AM

Nadine, there is the fact that eating, swallowing, and digestion (and excretion) are all fairly normal in zero-gravity, and getting sperm up in there would be a similar sort of process -- after all, having sex standing up will still get you preggers....

Posted by: linny at January 19, 2011 2:01 PM

after all, having sex standing up will still get you preggers....

Posted by: linny at January 19, 2011 2:01 PM

WHAT?? WHY WAS I MISINFORMED????

Posted by: Uriah Creep at January 19, 2011 10:05 PM