web
counter
 

Pajiba Dirty Talk: Accessorizing Sex

By Dr. Pisaster | Posted Under Pajiba Dirty Talk | Comments (21)



Sexy Christmas Lingerie.jpg

Many years ago, right around this time of year, I bought a sexy Mrs. Santa outfit in hopes of reigniting what had become a lukewarm (actually, more like ice cold) sex life with my ex. It was my one and only attempt at a sexy costume, but it’s far from the only time I’ve worn something with the intent of keeping it on during sex. Not because I want to cover anything up, but because sometimes a little bit of clothing can spice things up in ways both obvious and subtle. There are basically four reasons women, at least, wear clothes or accessories during sex: to disguise perceived flaws, as part of role-playing, because things are heating up too quickly to disrobe completely (or because the participants want to evoke that feeling), and finally, as a way to actually emphasize their nudity.
Unfortunately, given how body conscious many of us are, the first reason is likely the most common. There’s no real scientific studies on this, but a poll last year by the admittedly most likely biased website MyCelebrityFashion.co.uk found that 48% of women wore at least one item of clothing during sex, most of them to “improve body confidence,” which could be interpreted as meaning “I don’t like how this part of me looks naked.” While I can’t find any similar surveys about men, I’d venture to guess that in our six-pack obsessed culture there are those who feel uncomfortable being completely naked as well. In a perfect world, we’d all be able to take for granted that the person sleeping with us found us attractive enough to want to see us naked. Sadly, not only is insecurity pounded into us, both men and women, from every side, but the truth is there are a lot of dicks out there who actually will insult the very people who’ve been kind enough to fuck them because they don’t match an impossible ideal. Wearing something during sex to hide something about yourself is a terrible idea, but clothing can be used to improve confidence and make you feel sexier in the bedroom, if it’s employed strategically.

Next to insecurity, speed and access is probably the most common reason for keeping something on during sex. A skirt pushed up over the hips, shoes left on (but not socks alone please, unless they’re at least knee high if you’re a girl and probably never if you’re a guy), pants pulled down, a buttoned shirt undone but not removed, all give the impression of a passion so intense that it can’t wait long enough for everything to come off. We have all probably been there at least once. But the thing is, you don’t actually have to be in that much of a hurry to get the effect - just leaving something on even when it would be easy and quick to remove can give the impression of intensity even when you have all the time in the world. In a way, it’s a form of mild and spontaneous role-playing, one that requires no planning or effort (in fact, the opposite) and doesn’t involve the same level of awkwardness that more thought out role playing has for many. If you want to spice things up a bit, leaving something on, or asking your partner to, is one of the simplest ways to do so.

Of course, for those who can get past the awkwardness, clothes can also be used to create a character during sex. There are plenty of sites more than happy to sell you itty-bitty strips of spandex meant to evoke various professions/objects of sexual fantasies. Here, as with most sex products, men get screwed a bit. Search for sexy santa costume’s for women and you get this (don’t open that link at work or anywhere that anyone around you might be horrified by an automatically playing video of a chick describing her sexy outfit). The same site offers these as men’s equivalent costumes. (I won’t inflict on you the other sites I found that make more of an effort to make costumes sexy. Most of them involve suspenders. Nobody on God’s Green Earth finds suspenders sexy, except maybe a handful of geek fetishists.) If you’re a guy who wants to get dressed up to turn on your partner, my humble suggestion would be a fireman’s hat (or policeman or whatever other profession floats your lady’s/dude’s boat) and a nice pair of tall boots. Actually, that works pretty nicely for women too. Unless you’re into fully committing to characters and acting out a scene, the key is to create an stimulating and novel visual for your partner that in no way hinders his or her access to your naughty bits.

Which is also how my personal favorite form of sexy clothing works. Lingerie or other items that frame parts of the body and draw attention to them rather than away is an easy way to make sex just a little bit hotter with minimal effort. My personal favorite is the underbust corset or waist cincher, which tends to emphasize the femininity of the curve of a woman’s hips and waist while also drawing the eye to the breasts (depending on the rigidity of the style it can also provide a degree of restraint, if you’re into that). Bras that don’t cover the full breast, but instead leave the nipples exposed are another great way to focus your partner’s attention. Similarly, a garter belt with thigh high stockings, but no underwear, is an excellent way to frame a woman’s lower half while not actually covering anything up. For men this strategy is trickier, mostly because our culture doesn’t really bother much with men’s underthings. A chest harness is a nice way to emphasize the male chest, but not many men outside of the BDSM/gay scene are likely to be comfortable with them (and comfort is important when you’re trying to be sexy). Men can also wear waist cinchers or corsets, but the problem is the same - the association between any sort of lingerie and homosexuality and the lack of any positive representations of heterosexual men in lingerie in our culture makes this an uncomfortable arena for most men.

Human beings are visual creatures, and clothing, when used strategically, can provide a visual novelty that gives sex a bit of a boost. The key is not to try to hide anything, but to use clothes as an accessory to nudity, something that makes it all the more striking by its contrast.









Each Time You Like, Share, Tweet or Stumble a Pajiba Post, An Angel Does the Paul Rudd Dance



"American Horror Story"--"Afterbirth"--Ryan Murphy Wriggled Into That Gimp Suit And F*cked Us. Truthfully? We Liked it. | For Christmas I Got You A Sweet Lullaby About Children Killing Each Other. You're Welcome.









Comments

What about denim cutoffs? Are those okay?

Posted by: Dr. Fünke at December 23, 2011 1:19 PM

I hate lingerie on women. It frames the female form well, but that's the problem. It's a frame. It feels too rigid. I hate sex that feels arranged and planned. lingerie is like someone came in and did set decoration. It's a little OCD.

Posted by: John G. at December 23, 2011 1:44 PM

My girlfriend loves corsetry.

I have mo poimnt to make, I'm just happy and boasting, x.

Posted by: frank_247 at December 23, 2011 1:46 PM

"Corsetry"

That's a lovely word. Seriously. Say it.

"Corsetry"

Posted by: ZombieMedic at December 23, 2011 2:31 PM

Now all I can think about is Depeche Mode's "Blue Dress" - can you believe/something so simple/something so trivial/makes me a happy man.

Good lord, it's getting warm in here.

Posted by: Kati at December 23, 2011 2:35 PM

I do a mean version of that song.

Posted by: Jay at December 23, 2011 3:17 PM

I'm with John G. on lingerie. It looks fake. A tank top & panties is sexier.

Posted by: reanalyst at December 23, 2011 3:22 PM

I'm also not into lingerie-- it just seems so false and not worth the effort. I've often had to pretend with girlfriends that I find it sexy when I actually think girls look way hotter in pajama bottoms and a tank top.

Posted by: RandyBandito at December 23, 2011 3:54 PM

Which is also how my personal favorite form of sexy clothing works. Lingerie or other items that frame parts of the body and draw attention to them rather than away is an easy way to make sex just a little bit hotter with minimal effort. My personal favorite is the underbust corset or waist cincher, which tends to emphasize the femininity of the curve of a woman’s hips and waist while also drawing the eye to the breasts (depending on the rigidity of the style it can also provide a degree of restraint, if you’re into that). Bras that don’t cover the full breast, but instead leave the nipples exposed are another great way to focus your partner’s attention. Similarly, a garter belt with thigh high stockings, but no underwear, is an excellent way to frame a woman’s lower half while not actually covering anything up. For men this strategy is trickier, mostly because our culture doesn’t really bother much with men’s underthings. A chest harness is a nice way to emphasize the male chest, but not many men outside of the BDSM/gay scene are likely to be comfortable with them (and comfort is important when you’re trying to be sexy). Men can also wear waist cinchers or corsets, but the problem is the same - the association between any sort of lingerie and homosexuality and the lack of any positive representations of heterosexual men in lingerie in our culture makes this an uncomfortable arena for most men.

Posted by: BierceAmbrose at December 23, 2011 4:00 PM

&(*%^%$$@##$( computers.

Can somebody delete that waste of bits I just fat-fingered & I'll just skulk off someplace where I can maintain a hint of self control. (Different from other wastes of bits I sometimes inflict. Hey, it's not about standards. It's about intentions.)

I got all twitterpated with the body-talk.

Seriously, "frame body parts" and "draw attention to them" - like this a needful thing? Womenfolk are all woman-y in the bod - parts, all at once, dressed, undressed, costumed, uniformed, active & sweaty, mussed and dozing, severely put together just so ... yum.

Sometimes the overwrought, over-thought head-sex in Dirty Talk gives me a case of snoring WTF. This body talk, however ... or maybe I'm just eating too much red meat lately.

Posted by: BierceAmbrose at December 23, 2011 4:13 PM

I love lingerie, and my husband seems to as well. For him, I don't think it's so much "that's lovely lace, is it French?" or "that corset makes your breasts look great" as it is "Sex clothes! I am getting laid right now and it's gonna be good because she's excited enough to get dressed up for it. Maybe she'll let me try anal." As for me, I love well-made well-fitting lingerie because it makes me feel great.

In some cases it's about covering something up. For example, I have a very new, very large and still healing 8" surgery scar on my abdomen and covering it up during sex is helping me to feel a little more normal about my body since the surgery and more myself during sex. I'm slowly adjusting to how my stomach looks, but its a process and lingerie is a bit of a crutch while I get there. Most of the time, though, it's because I want to feel really sexy.

Posted by: Tits McGee at December 23, 2011 5:00 PM

I'm with you, RandyBandito,, a pair of pajama bottoms and a tank top, or a hoodie and panties is way better than lingerie.

Posted by: John G. at December 23, 2011 6:27 PM

I've never been big on lingere simply because I don't like "planned" sex. I'll wear it once in a rare while if I feel like intentionally seducing my husband like that, but I much prefer things to be more spur of the moment.

And I love, love, LOVE keeping some clothes on during sex. There's just something so illicit about feeling a man push your skirt up, or giving your man a blowjob with his jeans unzipped but still on.

On our wedding day (we eloped) as soon as we got done taking pictures we went back to our suite, had anal sex fully clothed (me in my wedding dress and him in Marine Dress Blues), afterwards we simply brushed off our clothes and went right out to dinner. *sigh* My wedding day was awesome...

Posted by: LaRhue at December 23, 2011 7:27 PM

Some lingerie I just think is pretty. I buy pretty underwear all the time, even though I know no one is going to see it.

Posted by: Candee at December 23, 2011 10:45 PM

Open-ended question for the hetero ladies: are jock straps just a gay thing, or do you enjoy them as well?

Posted by: jeem at December 24, 2011 2:24 AM

There is a whole other aspect to lingerie that the sage Dr. Pisaster left out...and that's the tactile part. There is nothing sexier than feeling the light caress of silk moving on your body directed by your lover's hands. I, in my humble experience, love to have my partner slowly remove a pair of light as air black stockings or run his hands over and under a clingy satin silk slip.

Posted by: brite at December 24, 2011 7:21 AM

Also, cheap lingerie sucks. Ladies and gentlemen, if you want the whole lingerie experience, spend the bucks.This shop out of Vancouver makes the most wonderful lingerie in the world.
http://www.christinelingerie.com/shop/

Posted by: brite at December 24, 2011 7:29 AM

"[B]ut the truth is there are a lot of dicks out there who actually will insult the very people who’ve been kind enough to fuck them because they don’t match an impossible ideal."

I can imagine how devastating it would be to have someone do this. It would be the worst possible time to be insulted. But thank your lucky stars that you found out what a jerk the person really is so soon in the relationship. And then find a better friend.

Posted by: Chuck Vekert at December 24, 2011 1:24 PM

"to disguise perceived flaws"

Thank you. Obviously there's no way a man can point to this potential reasoning, not without losing any chance of continuing on to sweet lovin, but I have been in that particular position a few times.

It's kind of obvious when someone wears lingerie with a ridiculous piece of fabric extending from the bra part to the bottoms part, effectivly covering a perceived tummy issue but more often acheiving the effect of looking silly, not sexy.

I'm sympathetic and wouldn't want to make the situation even more uncomfortable by pointing it out, or telling her that it doesn't matter (if she acknowledges that it is a cover-up) or that you prefer a different kind of lingerie, or none at all. The inevitable outcome, unless you're a heartless jerk, is to shut up and pretend nothing's amiss.

I'm sure there are instances like this that apply to men too, but it's been my experience that broaching the subject isn't quite the mood-killer it would be for the latter scenario. Mostly because it's hard to kill the mood for guys. That said, ugly lingerie is a step towards that end.

I'd much rather see flaws than cover-up or ugly lingerie. Costumes are not a turn on for me really, though I have seen a couple that are turn-ons, most likely due to Freudian reasons. For example, when I was a young teenager, there was a billboard for Mohawk Carpets which featured a very attractive woman in sexy Indian garb. It kinda informed that particular fetish, if you can call it that. Sexy nurse, sexy cop, sexy whatever - they don't do much for me really. I am a big fan of good lingerie when it's used as enhancement rather than cover-up. Wear a sexy black satin thong and not much else and I'm happy. To me clothes just get in the way once things start moving. They're appetizer, prelude, warm-up. The last thing I'd like is ramrodding half a thong into my girl because we pulled the thong aside rather than tossing it on the floor. Or tying her hands to the bedpost with it. Consensually, of course.

On the other hand, there really isn't much in the way of sexy for guys. Elephant undies? Please.

Posted by: Protoguy at December 24, 2011 5:56 PM

I agree with you, Brite, on the tactile part of lingerie, unfortunately, what women seem to buy most often is uncomfortable, unnattractive and rough lace. I hate lace.

Posted by: Protoguy at December 24, 2011 6:04 PM

Random tip: always match the bra with the panties. Beige bra with black panties? Ugh. Pink satin bra (the type you 'show') with red cotton boy shorts? Sorry, try harder.

If caught this way your only excuse (and totally acceptable, cos we're guys) is to gush "gee I didn't imagine I'd be doing this when I left the house this morning, but you're too hot to resist (etc)"

Posted by: Nick at December 31, 2011 5:26 AM