web
counter
 

Pajiba Dirty Talk: A Fascination with Feet

By Dr. Pisaster | Posted Under Pajiba Dirty Talk | Comments (25)



foot-fetish1.jpg

One thing that has always struck me as strange about the fairy tale “Cinderella,” is its almost fetishistic focus on her feet. Not only are they so small that no other woman could possibly fit her foot into Cinderella’s shoe, but of all the garments she wears to the ball, it is that shoe that is the focus — particularly in Perrault’s version, with it’s slipper made of glass (the better to display those tiny feet while also most likely restricting her movements because of its delicate nature, two common themes of foot fetishism). I’ve been thinking about this lately because of the claim that foot fetishism derives from an evolutionary desire for a woman with high estrogen levels (and therefore small feet). This evolutionary psychology interpretation of foot fetishism, like so many evo psych claims, is blatant in its disregard for both the nuances of human desires and the path of history.

First of all, “foot fetish,” is really a blanket term for a wide range of behaviors and desires, all of which have different motivations behind them. For some foot fetishists, their interest lies in the erotic potential of the foot as a sensory organ. The nerves on the bottom of the feet are some of the densest in the human body, making them an ideal location for sexual stimulation for many. On the other hand, feet are seen in many cultures as dirty as disgusting, and there will always be people who’s need for debasement causes them to react to such perceptions with desire. Foot fetishes can also be an aspect of dominance and submission. In our culture and many others, to kiss someone’s feet is to make clear that you are completely subservient to them. Paying particular attention to one’s partner’s feet, therefore, can be a sign of extreme submissiveness. For others still, it is about the visual shape of the feet, particularly when they are encased in high heels. Heels can serve both as restraints on the foot (and entire movement of a person, depending on how high they are) but also as weapons (see the popularity of stomping videos). These desires are all complicated and individual and saying that each and every one of them simply boils down to an innate bias towards more fertile women (and what about men’s feet?) is ridiculous.

Nor does the history of the fetish imply any relation to this evo psych interpretation. There have been various times and places in history where foot fetishism was common and openly acknowledged. There are written references to it from the 12th century in Europe, and it appears to have been popular in the 16th and 19th centuries as well. There is some speculation that these spikes in foot fetishism were in response to outbreaks of STIs (particularly gonorrhea and syphilis), since there’s little chance of getting a sexually transmitted disease from someone’s feet. These episodes, however, also occurred during periods where women had relatively more freedom, and therefore the rise of the fetish might have to do with shifts in the sexual dynamic between men to women.

Anyway, this is a decidedly western view of foot fetishism. The Cinderella story is as old as time, but the earliest written version, the one that first makes particular mention of the delicate size of the heroine’s feet, comes not from Europe but from 9th century China. Small feet were already a sign of beauty in China at this time, but in another hundred years, the national fascination with them would take a disturbing turn. Beginning in the 900s, the aristocracy of China would bind the feet of young girls in order to make them more physically appealing and to restrict their freedom to move. The practice gradually extended to the lower classes and was common well into the 20th century. Sometime between the ages of 3 and 11 girls feet were washed in a bath of warm water and then their four smallest toes were broken and folded back under the ball of the foot. In some cases the arch of the foot was also broken in order to make it possible for the foot to be compressed even more, and then it was tightly bound. The bindings were regularly changed and each time the new bandages were wound more tightly, to prevent proper healing and force the foot to grow into the “lotus” shape. The ultimate goal was a golden lotus, a foot measuring only 3 inches long. This practice, not surprisingly, caused girls a great deal of pain and made walking difficult, yet it was considered to be necessary if they were to attract a husband. And while the initial rationale behind foot binding may have had as much to do with controlling women’s behavior as it did physical beauty, bound feet came to be seen as highly erotic. Many Chinese writings from this time express an erotic obsession with bound feet and there are pornographic paintings from the same period that depict sexual acts focusing on the feet.

Small feet may be a sign of high estrogen production, but nobody would look at the results of foot binding and assume that such feet belonged to a healthy, fertile, woman. The more natural reaction, really, is horror. And yet for over a century they were the height of beauty and eroticism for an entire culture. The example of foot binding demonstrates rather powerfully that what we see as sexually desirable as highly dependent on cultural pressures as it is on evolutionary ones. There may be some evolutionary wiring buried deep in the complex forces that lead some people to be sexually attracted to feet, but it’s reductive in the extreme to say that evolution explains foot fetishism. What leads any given person to a fascination with feet will be highly individual. You can’t draw conclusions about an entire species based on the sexual habits of one segment of the population or even an entire population at one moment in time. Human sexuality is much too fluid and diverse for such interpretations.

Dr. Pisaster has a doctorate in biophysics, not actually anything sexy. She does however enjoy having sex, reading about sex, and talking about sex. Especially when she’s had a little whiskey.









Each Time You Like, Share, Tweet or Stumble a Pajiba Post, An Angel Does the Paul Rudd Dance



Too Cute To Die: Film and Television's Saddest Sacrifices | Pajiba After Dark 5/4/11









Comments

Feet are the windows to the sole.

I'll just go and hide now.

Posted by: BWeaves at May 4, 2011 5:16 PM

"This practice, not surprisingly, caused girls a great deal of pain and made walking difficult..."

An understatement if there ever was one.

Having 2 broken toes right now, I weep for the girls who endured that kind of torture.

Posted by: MonkeyHateClean at May 4, 2011 5:27 PM

".....since there’s little chance of getting a sexually transmitted disease from someone’s feet. "


Yeah, but imagine what Athlete's Penis looks like!

Posted by: frank_247 at May 4, 2011 5:32 PM

Heels are delicious. Just saying. I appreciate the torture that women put themselves through. Foot binding is just horrendously gross though.

Posted by: admin at May 4, 2011 5:48 PM

Is this one of those situations where "small feet are related to higher estrogen levels" is a truism, but only in the very narrowest sense? For example, dog people are fond of saying that early spay/neuter makes a dog shorter. The actual science behind this is that the longest leg bones are 1/4" shorter in dogs that have been neutered before six months of age. So it's true, but in reality, it's an almost meaningless truth.

There would seem to me to be better correlations with foot size than estrogen production. Smaller people typically have smaller feet. If you're six foot tall and wear a size five-and-a-half, you're freakin' going to tip over, Barbie.

Posted by: Wednesday at May 4, 2011 6:06 PM

*wipes brow*

Posted by: JakesAlterEgo at May 4, 2011 6:56 PM

I have such an aversion to small appendages. There's something downright disgusting about an average sized person (man or woman) with suuuuper tiny hands or feet. Tiny teeth are the worst.

Perhaps this is a consequence of being exposed to the imagery of foot binding as a kid, when the practice seemed (and still does) irrational, utterly grotesque and in no way aesthetically pleasing.


To be blunt small feet = barf.

Posted by: beet salad at May 4, 2011 7:55 PM

That foot binding stuff is appalling.

I think that Quentin Tarantino has become the leading pop culture figure for foot fetishism. I caught a revival screening of Kill Bill recently, and the audience went nuts for his foot shots.

Rex Ryan almost gave him a run for his money.

Posted by: DarthCorleone at May 4, 2011 8:30 PM

That was fascinating. And I am once again reminded that all in all this is the best time period in which to be a woman.

Posted by: Mrs. Julien at May 4, 2011 9:30 PM

Mrs. , loves it when I rub her feet, almost as much as she loves it when I rub her ass.

I rather enjoy both myself.

Posted by: , at May 5, 2011 1:05 AM

Well this certainly wasn't something I was expecting to see, but as a foot fetishist, myself, I say thanks for not painting us as simple-minded or just strange. I'm not too picky on shoe size, but foot-binding is truly awful all the way around.

And yes, I am gladly awaiting the next Tarantino movie.

Posted by: HotMustard at May 5, 2011 1:21 AM

Is there any proof supporting the idea that high estrogen = smaller feet? As for foot binding--given that the feet had to be kept wrapped up tight for years (and what with toes falling off), can you imagine the stink?

Posted by: True_Blue at May 5, 2011 1:25 AM

I followed that link to images of foot binding.

Oh dear Christ.
Oh dear Christ.
Oh dear Christ.
Oh dear Christ.
Oh dear Christ.
Oh dear Christ.

Fuckin' Christ Jesus!! Shit!

Posted by: Rest In Peace at May 5, 2011 1:36 AM


This evolutionary psychology interpretation of foot fetishism, like so many evo psych claims, is blatant in its disregard for both the nuances of human desires and the path of history.

I love you, Dr. Pisaster.

Posted by: John. G. at May 5, 2011 1:49 AM

Speaking as a gay foot fetishist, I'd have to say that the size of feet is not necessarily the key consideration, and certainly not what drives the fetish.

Thankyou for acknowledging the complex nature of such things and not Freud-ing our asses (yes, that was intentional) with a throwaway explanation. I couldn't tell you why I prefer men's feet to women's boobs.

Also, to any closed-minded individuals out there, don't knock a foot massage or toe sucking until you've received one. ;)

Posted by: OpeningNow at May 5, 2011 4:37 AM

Yeah, the Chinese are twisted folks. They had breast binding, too - naturally. And now imagine the frustration of having broken, rebroken and wrapped your feet for dozens of years to get them into that feckin' feet-fist-shape - all because of some insane Tang emperor who invented the whole thing - and then suddenly the dynasty's over, and you have to try to get them back to normal size...

I'd like more women to think about that when they can't decide if they're going for the 5 inch stilettos or the sensible plain ones. Do you really want your big toe and the second to be crossed in ten years? Come on, ladies. Appreciate your feet a bit.

Also, I'd like to second True_Blue's question about the estrogene. I need to know what my (european) size 43 say about me.

Posted by: Rooks at May 5, 2011 9:14 AM

I was wondering the same thing true_blue, because I gotta call bullshit on that one.

The size of your feet is determined by genetics, not hormones. Hormones might make your boobs larger or smaller, but that's fat and tissue - malleable stuff. Feet are made of bone and even fat fat feet don't go up in size, length or width-wise except where extra fat is concerned. If men take estrogen for therapeutic reasons, they grow boobs, not smaller feet.

While I have a healthy appreciation for a woman's foot, as long as it's kept in decent shape and not scaly or all bent-up from being crammed into shoes not meant for her particular hoof - you know who you are. I'd even go past the standard 'missionary' foot massage and go for the 'French' version and kiss a big toe, nibble a pinky, but as a fetish? No, I don't get it at all. Especially the squashing fetishes or the "stand on my face" fetish. I still hold to my theory that your fetish is usually based on either the Freudian, "I saw my mommy washing her feet and got a boner" kinda fetish - that chasing the first boner kinda thing. Or the "you're approaching the furry or diaper fetish zone and need to get away from me. Now."

Posted by: Protoguy at May 5, 2011 9:52 AM

My step-grandmother was born and raised in Japan and had her feet bound as a child. By the time I knew her, the previously-bound feet were a constant source of pain, and seemed to limit her mobility. It wasn't that she couldn't walk around, but it certainly didn't seem pleasant.

I would imagine that this loss of mobility was part of the motivation for this disfigurement, as you could count on your wife being home and not gallavanting around when she was in constant pain from walking. A very disturbing practice that went on far more recently than I thought before I met her.

Posted by: Douchebag McGee at May 5, 2011 9:59 AM

Protoguy, I don't have any particular knowledge of estrogen levels relation to foot size, but I don't know that you can dismiss the claim based on what happens to fully-formed adults on exposure to estrogen. Genetics certainly plays a part, but estrogen can't be dismissed outright. Higher estrogen levels in the womb and during early childhood could very well have a correlation with smaller feet. It is widely believed that higher testosterone levels in the womb and during early childhood have some effects on the size of various body parts, so there is some precedent.

Posted by: Douchebag McGee at May 5, 2011 10:04 AM

What I find disturbing with some fetishists, if you stumble on the Flickr stream or Photobucket or whatever, there is no variety. There is no sex, no images of love or even sex (well, beyond sex with feet), it's all feet all day. Every pic is some chicks foot and that's it.

I would say that if I had a fetish it would be for women with small waists and slightly large butts. But I still like pics of boobies or the general beave shot. If I cared enough to have a favorites page it would be beautiful women doing many different things, with perhaps a statistical majority being heiny shots. Not every single damn picture a but in a thong shot.

That's when it goes beyond a healthy fetish, an innocent propensity for a certain type or act, and becomes a freakish, single-minded psychological impediment to (air-quotes) normal sexual behavior. If you can't get it up without rubbing it off in a high heel, you're fucked up, sorry. Preferring to have your significant other wear sexy shoes is 'normal'. If you can't find a woman attractive or sexy without them, you're fucked up. Sorry. Not, Dahmer fucked up, but therapy-is-in-order fucked up.

Posted by: Protoguy at May 5, 2011 10:12 AM

I might agree Douchebag (ha) if the article was about girls in the womb and the effect of estrogen on bone growth, but it isn't. Unless I missed something, it's about a fetish and the estrogen theory was brought up as evidence of an evolutionary or unconscious attraction to small feet because it tells our early mammalian brain that small feet mean fertility or femininity.

Posted by: Protoguy at May 5, 2011 10:17 AM

I love going to play parties and doing scenes for a while, then sitting down and taking my killer heels off. It's like shaking the container of cat treats-- a foot fetishist will always come running, and then I get a great footrub.

You do have to be careful to explain that there will be no touching above the knees, because some people will try to go there, but it helps to have someone to talk to while they're working.

Posted by: That Girl at May 5, 2011 10:56 AM

Also, to any closed-minded individuals out there, don't knock a foot massage or toe sucking until you've received one. ;)

Having received both, I whole-heartedly agree. However I am far from a foot fetishist. I merely enjoy sensual touching all over. Ever been kissed on the back of the knee? It is laughable how sexy it feels.

That Girl, I'm not sure what kind of party you are describing, but it sounds like fun.

I have always enjoyed giving people foot rubs, but not as a sexual thing. I just like to serve people and make them happy... no, that still sounds sexual... I promise, it is just a nice gesture.

Posted by: Patty O'Green at May 6, 2011 12:52 PM

Lotus feet, super-high heels, and other practices that eroticize the female foot also make the female in question more helpless and more dependent on the male who's doing the eroticizing.

Posted by: Maeralin at May 14, 2011 2:16 AM

Syphilis and STD's need to be controlled

Posted by: Syphilis Sucks at June 10, 2011 5:41 PM