free counter with statistics The Matrix Review | Pajiba - Scathing Reviews for Bitchy People

trinity11.jpg
Whoa


The Films of 1999: The Matrix / Daniel Carlson

Pajiba Blockbusters | May 27, 2009 | Comments (40)


[For Hollywood — by which I mostly mean mainstream U.S. movies — 1999 was one hell of a year. The films released in those 12 months mined millennial fears and postmodern angst, heralding the arrival of daring new talent and offering modern masterpieces from up-and-coming directors. Ten years later, it’s easy to see that’s when the 21st century really began. This entry is the first in a series examining some of the key films of that year.]

It’s something close to sublime that The Matrix came out the same year as George Lucas’ Star Wars: Episode I — The Phantom Menace. Lucas’ film had been building hype for decades, but the Wachowski brothers’ sci-fi/action flick opened inauspiciously in March 1999 and relied on effusive word-of-mouth praise to carry it home. The film was an effects-heavy techno-thriller that’s fantastic in its own right, a well-made, tightly paced machine, but it also served as the Star Wars for the millennial generation, and it did so for a few simple reasons: It offered dazzling modern effects based on vintage technology; its screenplay was perfectly plotted and followed classic structural and archetypal set-ups; and its name would come to be sullied by lifeless, embarrassing sequels. Such is life.

The Matrix was the third film written by Andy and Larry Wachowski and their second directorial effort (after Bound), but it’s the one that put their names on the map. The opening sequence set the tone for the film, a rooftop chase and gun battle between men in suits, referred to as agents, and a leather-clad heroine named Trinity (Carrie-Anne Moss) who could apparently defy gravity on a whim. The sequence does a marvelous job at confounding expectations, allowing the Wachoskiwis enough wiggle room to create a story that literally couldn’t happen in the real world. By the time they introduce Thomas Anderson (Keanu Reeves), a hacker who operates under the handle Neo, they’ve succeeded in establishing a stylish world with its own rules.

The first act follows Neo’s pursuit of the mysterious Morpheus (Laurence Fishburne), a purported leader of a group of hackers known for bringing down major institutions, which is an adorably 1990s profession and premise. But the real surprise comes when Neo meets Morpheus, who informs him that everything he knows about the real world is wrong, and that existence bends to the whims of the Matrix. Morpheus ominously tells Neo that “no one can be told what the Matrix is; you have to see it for yourself.” This is accurate in the sense that only being directly exposed to the Matrix will allow for maximum effect on the viewer, but really Morpheus could have just told the truth: The Matrix is a simulation of the real world achieved by plugging a jack directly into people’s brains. The screenplay raises interesting questions about the nature of reality that would soon dominate the thoughts of dorm-room pseudo-intellectuals nationwide, but the real fun of the gimmick is that Neo — once extracted from the Matrix, reintroduced to the postapocalyptic wasteland the world has become, and allowed to plug back into the program at whim — basically gets to inhabit a giant video game. Action movies have long felt like console shooters, with the lone hero cutting his way through progressively more challenging enemies until he meets the boss, but it wasn’t until The Matrix that the two fused so perfectly. The film is beautifully and powerfully of its era, as subtextually rooted in gamer entertainment as it is pop philosophy and classic archetypes.

The bulk of the film revolves around Morpheus’ belief that Neo is the one who will bring an end to the war between humans and the machines that have risen up and enslaved them in the Matrix, and the good guys periodically plug back into the Matrix in order to fight its operatives. But because what was formerly the real world has now been proven to be a digital construct, its rules can be fudged or ignored altogether; just like any video game, this one can be overridden with cheats. The best — or at any rate, the most imitated and resonant — way this makes itself known is in the stunning slow-motion camera work in which the Wachowskis rotate the camera around their subjects. In the world of the Matrix/The Matrix, it’s possible to dodge bullets, and the Wachowskis make this look dazzling while relying on a technique pioneered by 19th-century photographer Eadweard Muybridge, who used a series of 24 cameras along a track to capture a horse’s gait and prove its legs left the ground. The Wachowskis simply took that line of cameras and wrapped it in an arc around their actors, shot them in high-speed against a green screen, and played it back at a regular frame rate. Their creation is often referred to as “bullet time,” and it’s been used in countless movies and games since, and they made it by using the oldest trick in the book.

The screenplay also turned on classic beats and plot points, just as George Lucas’ film had 22 years before. Neo’s journey from outcast to redeemer feels perfect because from a structural standpoint it is; there are no real surprises in the film, but it’s still so tightly made and effortlessly energetic that it remains tense and exciting after multiple viewings. This is in large part because the Wachowskis outdid themselves on action sequences, merging their computer-generated visions with old-fashioned squibs and set demolitions. The fight scenes live up to their characters’ belief that the rules of their world can be bent or broken, and no moment captures this as well as the extended gunfight in the lobby of a giant building where Morpheus is being held prisoner after sacrificing himself to save Neo and Trinity on a mission. Mounting a rescue attempt, Neo and Trinity load themselves up with guns in a pornographic tribute to modern games and take the building by storm, unleashing three solid minutes of mayhem on a host of unsuspecting guards and wrecking everything in their path. It remains a classic moment of the series because it’s clear the Wachowskis are honestly having fun — they just want stuff to get blowed up good — and haven’t yet begun to crack under the pressure to make their franchise mean anything more than a good time.

Because this film is, ultimately, a good time. It’s a rock-solid blockbuster that’s just self-aware enough to avoid self-parody, and it packs in moments of genuine characterization alongside fantastic effects sequences and genuinely thrilling escapes. The problem is that the film has been conflated with its legacy, and that in turn has been tangled up in the sequels, 2003’s double blast of The Matrix Reloaded and The Matrix Revolutions, a pair of films as gleefully free of form and skill as their grammatically questionable titles would suggest. The second and third films in the franchise were bloated, lumbering movies that leaned too much on effects, diluted the strength and simplicity of the main story, and wound up turning Neo into the cheap allegory for a Christ figure that some had been unwise to wish he had been all along. And that’s a shame, because those sequels cloud people’s memories and make it easier to forget that the first film is still a blast. It’s tightly done, remarkably well made, and functions perfectly within its own universe. It creates a story of rigid lines and then bends and blurs them. It changed sci-fi and action and pop movies for years to follow, and no one saw it coming.

Daniel Carlson is the managing editor of Pajiba and a TV critic for The Hollywood Reporter. You can visit his blog, Slowly Going Bald.


"Doctor Who," Series One | 80's Shows That Shouldn't Be Brought Back



Comments

Your subtitle says Films of 1999. Does this hint a retrospect on movies released during this year a la Classics week? If so, keep me posted, because The Matrix is no doubt a cool movie. Sequels be damned because even though the sequels are messy, as was Speed Racer (Please, do not remind me of it) The Matrix remains one of the nineties' biggest successes. One that wasn't adorable and animated, or that featured a scary as shit Anthony Hopkins.

Posted by: Kamikaze Feminist at May 27, 2009 3:11 PM

Blah, blah, blah. I still prefer Bound.

Posted by: Tracer Bullet at May 27, 2009 3:26 PM

Well said. I loved the original more than I love lamp.

*whisper*
I also likr the other two.

Posted by: admin at May 27, 2009 4:10 PM

Meh. I stopped dropping acid in 1998 so this movie is completely irrelevant to me.

Posted by: Heathen at May 27, 2009 4:15 PM

I hated the sequels when they came out too, but they're pretty fun to watch now. It helps if you fast-forward through the awkward Neo/Trinity sex; the pointlessly long rave scene; and the numbing "Neo vs. a billion Agent Smith" battles.

Posted by: epimethea at May 27, 2009 4:29 PM

"Notting Hill"'s next, right?

Posted by: Jay at May 27, 2009 4:40 PM

"I hated the sequels when they came out too, but they're pretty fun to watch now. It helps if you fast-forward through the awkward Neo/Trinity sex; the pointlessly long rave scene; and the numbing "Neo vs. a billion Agent Smith" battles."

So you mean to say you just watch the trailer?

Posted by: Fuel at May 27, 2009 4:43 PM

It was actually in the reverse for me. I was still young when Phantom Menace came out, so I could never have been disappointed, but due to The Matrix's R rating, it took forever to convince my parents to let me see it.

Everyone I knew saw it before me, so I was expecting the greatest movie ever, but by the time I got their, I felt like my hype was busted. By the time I got to see it, The Matrix had already been everywhere, and the novelty of it wore off. Plus, the sequels were released afterwards, so it lost its invincibility.

Maybe my kids will have the advantage due to not having expectations. I can only hope.

Posted by: George at May 27, 2009 4:46 PM

Kamikaze - I share your hope that this is part of a series.

Posted by: tamatha at May 27, 2009 4:50 PM

But that's not to say I hate The Matrix, every time I see it again, I enjoy it more, same with Pulp Fiction, felt disappointed the first time, but as I watch it again and again, I like it more and more.

Posted by: George at May 27, 2009 4:54 PM

Great writeup, 1999 was definitely one Hell of a year. The point about Muybridge is also a pretty great insight. I'm curious what you thought of "Speed Racer," which is flawed but still strikes me as the kind of seminal, visionary eye fuck that's going to be held in way higher regard once it's influence gets digested.

Posted by: Sam at May 27, 2009 4:55 PM

So you mean to say you just watch the trailer?
The car/motorcycle/semi battle on the highway with the ghost twins was pretty sweet. The concept of programs with feelings and desires was cool too. And programs designed to subvert the system? It's a built-in fail safe.

Posted by: epimethea at May 27, 2009 4:58 PM

There really should be an Underappreciated Gems on Sequels/Followups that Sucked at first viewing with high expectations and hype levels, but were actually pretty sweet in retrospect. Matrix: Revolutions would slip right into that list for me, along with Unbreakable (Shyamalan).

Posted by: epimethea at May 27, 2009 5:04 PM

I'm so excited about this new series! 1999 was my movie year that I would've posted about in that comment diversion we had a little while ago. That was the summer of my very first job: working at a movie theater. I think about that summer the same way that Lester Burnham thinks about his youthful summers working at that burger place.

Which is all just to say yay!

Posted by: tbean at May 27, 2009 5:18 PM

i love the WHOLE trilogy (including the animatrix).


sure the first was the best, but i saw the 2nd at midnight at the drive-in the night before it opened and enjoyed myself completely.
until the "to be continued".
the whole place let out a single "awww".

the 3rd was the weakest (or so they say) but i enjoyed the hell out of it also.

yeah for pot!

Posted by: gp at May 27, 2009 5:28 PM

one other thing: kudos on the BEST header picture. who didn't swoon when trinity said "dodge this"??

bunch of liars, you wanted it.

Posted by: gp at May 27, 2009 5:30 PM

I just have one problem with this write-up:

The flawed, YES, FLAWED, TIRED, DOUCHEY, HIPSTER-ROTE, premise that the sequels were somehow failed. WHAT THE FUCK did you people want? ReLoaded had perhaps some of the best action sequences put on film (see the battle at the Merovingian's crib), characters were developed, the story had a conclusion in Revolutions.

What's the fucking problem?

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at May 27, 2009 7:27 PM

What's the fucking problem?

It seems to me he said his problem with the sequels right there:

The second and third films in the franchise were bloated, lumbering movies that leaned too much on effects, diluted the strength and simplicity of the main story, and wound up turning Neo into the cheap allegory for a Christ figure that some had been unwise to wish he had been all along.

Yes, you are correct. The story was concluded, the characters were given more "development", and the action surpassed the original in places. But really, a lot of that stuff was ridiculously confusing and unnecessary. Namely, the Architect's ludicrously circuitous speech, the restaurant/orgasm cake, the GODSDAMN RAVE SCENE.

Thing is, the actual plot (finding out their source of hope was another plan for control) was ingenious. But they bought into the pseudo-intellectual hype people put on the first one and lost control.

Posted by: Vermillion at May 27, 2009 7:58 PM

But they bought into the pseudo-intellectual hype people put on the first one and lost control.

Posted by: Vermillion at May 27, 2009 7:58 PM

--------------------------------------------------

(I'll grant you the rave scene but not the one with the cake)

How is it pseudo-intellectual? What exactly? It seemed pretty straightforward to me. It's a program, it's unstable, the code tries to correct itself with each version that comes after the one that came before. How is that pseudo-intellectual? They weren't anymore "pseudo" than Morpheous' first explanations to Neo in the first movie!

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at May 27, 2009 8:07 PM

Well, this is interesting. I was, like, what? Seven or eight in '99. I just spent my TV time watching old-school Cartoon Network.

I'm obviously older now, but I've actually yet to see Matrix. That fact about the photographer and horse that Daniel provided was pretty neat, though.

Posted by: KP at May 27, 2009 8:15 PM

The third movie would have been considerably better if the actress who played the Oracle hadn't been so inconsiderate as to die in-between filming.

Shows what'shisname hobbit-director had the right idea, filming all three LOTR movies in one long go. After all you never know when one of those ancient but oh-so-talented British actors might choke on a young boy.

Posted by: Neodiogenes at May 27, 2009 8:25 PM

How is it pseudo-intellectual? What exactly?

For one, the Christ/Buddha allegory sledgehammer, which was only hinted at in the first film. I mean he literally dies in a cross formation!

Second, the Merovingian and those connected to him. While superficially impressive, they were ultimately pointless. The Keymaster runaround? Pointless. The ghost twins? Pretty much the Boba Fett of the series (cool to look at, but ultimately wasted). The only one that had any kind of actual significance was Persephone and her desire for a kiss, but even that was treated more like a way to piss off Trinity and less as a look into the developing feelings of the programs.

Lastly, there is the Architect. My God, was that superfluous. Not that the actual content was bad (like I said, I liked the idea), but couldn't they have presented it in a way that didn't shut down the momentum of the film for so long? After all the kinetics of the film before that point, it was like hitting a brick wall. And really, for all the SAT words and double-backed sentences and lops and turns in language, the message was pretty clear and easy to figure out. It seemed like the only reason that scene was in there like that was to make the film seem more profound and philosophical, when it simply made it more muddled.

And on the non-psuedo-intellectual end, pretty much everything involving the real world except for the last battle/desperate hovercraft chase was just as bad. Really, guys? You really want to do political grandstanding in the middle of what could be the last gasp of humanity as far as you know? Instead of concerning himself with mounting half a decent defense, the leader was too busy giving the stink-eye to Morpheus because he may have porked his lady.

Posted by: Vermillion at May 27, 2009 9:07 PM

Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmm.

I hear you. Although I have to disagree on the the Keymaster being pointless I find no problem with his bit on account that it was the means for Neo getting to see the Architect. The Matrix cast-offs around the Merovingian should have been made more more prominent in my opinion (the whole flick could have been about a powered-up Neo confronting these creatures)but they didn't go that way.
The film was just Neo getting to the Architect and choosing, using his will and NOT doing what the program mandated. I think that if you view it as such, it works. But I can certainly understand your points and respect them.

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at May 27, 2009 9:28 PM

You're completely right: it's always hard for me to remember how good the first movie was, because I always remember how AWFUL the sequels were, and it's hard to separate them. But whenever I catch the first movie on tv (which isn't very often, they seem to play the sequels over and over again for some damn reason) I always enjoy it. 1999 was a horrible year for me, but I remember this movie was a highpoint.

I still want Neo's boots and a black trenchcoat, even though I know I'd look ridiculous in them.

Posted by: figgy at May 27, 2009 9:50 PM

The film was just Neo getting to the Architect and choosing, using his will and NOT doing what the program mandated. I think that if you view it as such, it works.

It does, and it was a great turn for the story. I just wish it was more of a tight corner turn than a wild fishtail kind of turn.

Plus, my brother spent the last year or so after seeing it pontificating on it so much, I really couldn't take it anymore.

But I can certainly understand your points and respect them.

Umm....okay. Thanks.

*whisper*Are you being held hostage? Are they still there? Blink once for yes, two for no.*whisper*

Posted by: Vermillion at May 27, 2009 9:51 PM

You know, I'm just going to take the high road here and go back to watching tonight's episode of The Cougar.

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at May 27, 2009 10:02 PM

Does Vivica Fox make up any new words?

Posted by: Vermillion at May 27, 2009 10:04 PM

This is a long comment- if that bothers anyone, get acquainted with your scroll bars.

Because this film is, ultimately, a good time. It’s a rock-solid blockbuster that’s just self-aware enough to avoid self-parody, and it packs in moments of genuine characterization alongside fantastic effects sequences and genuinely thrilling escapes.

…and take away the self awareness and genuine characterisation, insert slabs of soporific exposition and sophomoric ruminations on the nature of free will, then all the fantastic effects sequences in the world won’t prop it up.

The sequels sucked for what they could have been had the Wachowskis exercised a modicum of restraint. In an eerie coincidence, I re-watched both sequels last week with the remote and managed to edit it together as one three hour film. While obviously rough, it worked pretty well.

***SPOILERS ON THE OFF CHANCE YOU MISSED IT***:
Neo, still as wooden as the crucifix but as hard as the nails that fix him to it, has honed his abilities to the point where he can see the future, thus hinting he is something more than human. Agent Smith has also survived, now Neo-ized: unplugged and rebellious, with the newfound ability to replicate at will within the Matrix, which he uses to cross over to the real world via a jacked in human.

The Oracle reveals that she is in fact a sentient program, that not all programs believe in the destruction of humanity. With the help of one such program, the Keymaker, Neo learns that the Matrix is imperfect by design and that breakaways like himself are in fact a feature, not a bug. The human brain could not cope with the notion of a perfectly balanced world, hence the product of the imperfect alternative is that a certain number of rebellious individuals eventually break free The cost to the machines of keeping the battery farm healthy is that every now and again they have to clean up the “remainders of the imperfect equation” before they become too much of a nuisance.

The action picks up with the machines digging towards Zion as they have done five times before, in a neat if unintentional parallel to the “big five” major extinction events in earth’s history*. Neo’s role in the charade is to act as a savior to the humans when in fact he is a tool of the machines. His actual “program” is to return to the source, reboot the Matrix and pick out a handful of survivors to be left behind to keep the Zion homefires burning for when the next round of “remainders” start to trickle in. Neo says shove it and refuses to play his part. The machines say “oh well matey, have it your way. We’ll survive on a limited level, but your lot certainly won’t”.

The machines break through the first defences of Zion and all manner of explosions, eyepopping CGI choreography and no-man-left-behind war movie cliches ensue. The humans mount a plucky but ultimately futile rear guard action until seemingly inevitable defeat is forestalled by the unexpected arrival of an EMP bearing ship. Incidentally, this detail cements Locke as the single dumbest military strategist since Custer: whinge that everyone isn’t good enough, claim that the situation is overwhelming then fail to keep at least ONE your most effective weapons on standby just in case things didn’t go well. Fucktard

Smith’s crossover to the human world is mirrored by Neo with his newfound ability to not only sense machines, but also destroy them sans conventional weaponry. Recognising that simply going back to die with the hopelessly outgunned humans isn’t going to work, Neo instead opts to go to the machine city and negotiate a truce. His bargaining chip is that he is the only one who can stop the now-uncontrolled Smith who has spread virus-like throughout the Matrix. The Source agrees, jacks him in and one pointless over-extended fight later Smith infects Neo, thus providing the connection the Source needs to wipe him clean. The Matrix is reset, the Source honours it’s bargain and halts the attack, Neo fulfils the prophecy at the cost of his own life (we think) and peace is won.

That is one solid three hour film. A (mostly) logical extension of a thoughtfully constructed universe that offers a meaty plot, character development and ample room for all manner of cgi-infused action mayhem. If there is ever an argument for an editors cut of a film, these two would be it. Less in this case, would most certainly have been more.

Posted by: Dave Shepherd at May 27, 2009 10:26 PM

I never saw either of the sequels to The Matrix- or for that matter, any of the new Star Wars. I'm going to keep it that way so I can watch those movies with glee and not bitter resentment.

Posted by: Lola at May 28, 2009 12:23 AM

I wonder how the world would have turned out if Val Kilmer was Morpheus and Will Smith didn't follow Hayek's knockers to the Wild Wild West.

Hmmmmmm.........

Posted by: haplo at May 28, 2009 2:19 AM

Might be stating the freaking obvious here, but the Oracle created Smith, right? Or at least, messed with his program to bring him back to life as a matrix-eating virus and force the Source to stop wiping out the humans already?

I've never been entirely sure if that was an established fact or just a delusion of a brain drowning in Too Much Symbolism.

Posted by: ScienceGeek at May 28, 2009 2:52 AM

The first time I watched The Matrix, all I wanted was for Morpheus to be The One. But sadly, it was not to be. I loved this film anyway, and even the craptacular liveaction sequels haven't tarnished it (the Animatrix was good).

Posted by: YeahButNoBut at May 28, 2009 5:10 AM

don't remember much about 1999 but I remember myself and three geeky mates watching this movie and loving it. It was awesome, though a bit confusing. I only saw it once and I never saw the sequels. Maybe it's time to revisit it.

Posted by: barf at May 28, 2009 6:37 AM

I always associate The Matrix with Dark City (crazy-great despite featuring desperate blonde boozerat Keifer Sutherland (...-or am I being harsh?)) and ExistenZ (crazy-great despite featuring technology that looks like mutated cancer blobs) for awesome 1999 movies - all that excellent fucking with reality stuff. For anyone who enjoyed The Matrix but hasn't seen the other two, give them a go.

Posted by: freddie at May 28, 2009 7:25 AM

Might be stating the freaking obvious here, but the Oracle created Smith, right? Or at least, messed with his program to bring him back to life as a matrix-eating virus and force the Source to stop wiping out the humans already?

You know what? I am not that sure either. I, like most people, just took it for granted that Smith somehow absorbed a piece of Neo when he "killed" him. But how the hell did he come back in the first place? That explanation is jsut as good as any.

Posted by: Vermillion at May 28, 2009 8:26 AM

It is one of my favorite movie.

Posted by: Website Design at May 28, 2009 9:25 AM

Sorry, but as a member of the "millennial" generation, our Star Wars was Lord of the Rings, not the Matrix. For one, LotR works as an actual trilogy, Matrix has one decent movie and two craptacular ones (though I will say the first sequel was at least less boring than the second). Also, as another commenter mentioned: almost anyone who's really a "millenial" would have been too young for R-rated movies in 1999.

Even more: who's still re-watching this periodically? Who do you know who decided they loved (or even wanted to make) movies because of the Matrix? Who's planning on showing Matrix to their kids when they're old enough to appreciate it? Because all of those things are why Star Wars is Star Wars to my parents and their generation. I don't know anyone who feels anything like that about the Matrix, but I could find you plenty of people my age who would answer "yes" to those questions if you asked about Lord of the Rings.

Groundbreaking, widely copied, spectacular in its day? Sure, Matrix was all that. But in the decade following, it hasn't held up. The original Star Wars trilogy still does, and that had lousy follow-ups to tarnish its legacy, too.

Posted by: McSnarkster at May 28, 2009 11:34 AM

By the way, what Muybridge was trying to prove or disprove is whether ALL the horse's feet left the ground at once. This is the way older paintings depicted horses galloping. Turns out, it;s wrong. He proved at least one foot is on the ground at all times.

He also set up those cameras to study animal locomotion in general, not just the horse thing.

Posted by: Max at May 28, 2009 11:41 AM

Max: You have it reversed. While galloping all a horse's feet leave the ground at moments, while the conventional wisdom was that they had to have at least one foot touching else they'd fall. Here's an animated GIF of the picture he took of a horse galloping:

Muybridge's horse

Posted by: Steven Lloyd Wilson at May 28, 2009 12:28 PM

Didn't those motherfuckers Make a Highway to wreck in matrix Reloaded?

Admit it though, Reloaded may not be anywhere as good as the First one but that Highway chase scene is clearly a highlight of the entire series, ESPECIALLY when those trucks collide head on.

Posted by: RonnyK at May 30, 2009 2:16 AM