blogspot
visitor
Ronin | Pajiba - Scathing Reviews for Bitchy People

ronin12.jpg

Pajiba Blockbusters

Do Everything You Were Sent Here For, Fire at Will if You Hear That Call

Ronin / TK

Pajiba Blockbusters | August 29, 2008 | Comments (48)


There are two Robert De Niros. There is the embarrassing goon who mugs for the camera, who shows absolutely no discernible taste or talent while subjecting us to cinematic swamp gas like Analyze That, 15 Minutes, and Meet the (fucking) Fockers. Then there is the other De Niro, the one most of us fell in love with at some point. The one whose name we were once excited to see attached to a project. The De Niro of The Godfather Part II, Cop Land, Heat, even Jackie Brown. The De Niro whose performances are subtle, intelligent characterizations instead of shameless, cartoonish (I’m looking at you, Rocky and Bullwinkle!) caricatures. Thankfully, Ronin stars the latter De Niro. Sadly, it’s a De Niro we’ve rarely seen since.

Similarly, there were two John Frankenheimers (before his unfortunate demise) — there was the classic film maker, the man whose camera work became legendary and inspirational to younger directors. He was responsible for densely plotted and shrewdly directed films (The Manchurian Candidate, Seven Days in May, The Train) — but alas, towards the end there was a noticeable decline in his films, culminating (or perhaps bottoming out) with the dreadful Reindeer Games which was depressingly his last theatrical release (a grim final legacy exceeded only by Raul Julia and Street Fighter). Ronin is unquestionably the last great film he gave us.

In Ronin, Robert De Niro plays Sam, an out-of-work spy and Cold War orphan - one of the apparently numerous agents of intrigue and nefarious purpose left with no direction after the fall. He and a half dozen other former operatives are recruited by the enigmatic and seriously trust-impaired Deirdre (Natasha McElhone) to retrieve a briefcase, by force, from an unnamed party intent on selling said case to Russian agents. As with films like Pulp Fiction and Sneakers, the briefcase is a simple MacGuffin - it’s contents are irrelevant. The plot of Ronin is brutally simple - Men are hired to steal the case. One of them betrays the rest. Men track down the traitor, lose him and the case, catch him and lose him, and eventually there’s a big reveal and… the end. In lesser hands, we’d have ended up with another derivative snoozer that takes all the clichés and gives us nothing in return. However, Frankenheimer succeeds in taking a conventionalized idea and executing it perfectly. Of course, the cast helps — just like the workmanlike professionals they portray, the actors in Ronin are skilled, deliberate and for the most part devoid of pretense. Each character serves a crucial role, carefully handpicked by Deirdre’s intermediary; there’s the wheelman Larry (Skipp Sudduth), the self-nominated “weapons man” Spence (Sean Bean, in a limited, but excellent-as-usual performance), Vincent (the always-enjoyable Jean Reno), the self proclaimed “tour guide” and Gregor (Stellan Skarsgård), the electronics expert. Rounding out the cast is the aforementioned McElhone, as well as Jonathan Pryce as Seamus, Deirdre’s handler, and a short-but-sweet role for French actor Michael Lonsdale as Vincent’s friend who helps patch one of the group up after a particularly nasty gunfight.

The title, Ronin, is taken from the Japanese term for masterless samurai, men who lost their master and would seek out combat for money instead of the usual dutiful honor. As such, the characters reflect this work ethic. These are neither the Jason Bournes nor the Ethan Hunts and James Bonds of the world. Instead, their personae are far more grounded, with less emphasis on martial arts and super-soldier silliness and more on caution, planning and economical execution. Sam, Vincent and their compatriots are tired, worn-out men; quiet veterans from a decades-long war that, to them, ended without climax or fanfare. If you’ve read Robert Littell’s excellent fictionalized history of the C.I.A., “The Company,” think Harvey Torriti left without purpose or prospects. They are not looking for a way out, nor are they looking to retire — they’re simply looking for something to do. Given their skill sets, that something is likely to involve subterfuge and violence.

Written by J.D. Zeik and with a screenplay by David Mamet (who apparently did most of the writing, but is listed under the pseudonym “Richard Weisz”), Ronin is the ultimate example of sparse, austere screenwriting. Every second of the film seems loaded with focus and purpose, as if the film makers were loathe to include any shots even remotely superfluous. As is sometimes the case when David Mamet is involved, either by pen or by lens, a Spartan feeling pervades the film (not to mention its rare dry, sharp humor) . Despite the exotic locales used for filming (Paris, Nice, Arles), other than some gorgeous wide landscape shots, the direction and cinematography is still frequently harsh and unyielding, focusing on tight, narrow angles in dark alleys and cramped cobbled streets. It’s interesting that this grim work ethic suffuses the film — not just the motivations and ethics of the characters themselves, but also the acting, the direction and cinematography all reflect a similar frame of mind. The refuges that they hole up in as they travel through the film are stark, dank places — run-down motels and abandoned warehouses filled with military cots and coffee in tin cups. Their lives are actually pretty drab, but when the call to action is sounded, they are fast, efficient, and frequently brutal. Interestingly, there’s a brief, random sex scene that, the first time I saw the film, felt tacked on and uncalled for. But after seeing it a couple of times, I came to realize that these are, at their core, soldiers. The rule for soldiers has always been that you take what you can when you have the time to take it. Whether it’s eating, sleeping, using the bathroom, and yes, even sex — it’s yet another example of world-weary lives still functioning with machine-like efficiency.

Ronin is an excellent combination of slow buildup and big payoffs. The bulk of the film is devoted to the plotting and machinations of the various groups, each trying to out-think the other. As such, there’s a nervous tension throughout the film — these severe and cautious machinations create a miasma of paranoia that is almost palpable. De Niro is particularly effective — constantly asking questions and threatening to back out if he can’t be certain of the logistics or if he feels they’re being left in the dark. At the other end, McElhone has to carefully balance what is essentially a crew of spies and killers, while still playing her hand as close to the vest as possible. When De Niro finally snaps and demands, “If it’s gonna be a amateur night, I want a hundred thousand dollars. I want it upfront. I want it in a bank account, and I want another $100,000 when you get the case,” it’s with a combination of frustration and desperation that creates a great bit of tension in the film.

All of these schemes and plots lead to the aforementioned payoffs, including a taut, frenetic clusterfuck of a gun battle in an ancient coliseum, and the infamous car chase. Ronin has one of the most impressive car chases ever filmed, one that I feel is frequently left out of the “great car chase” discussion. It’s a lengthy, gripping affair, spanning gorgeous countrysides and claustrophobic alleys with equal recklessness, not to mention the requisite gun fire and explosions. Yet it lacks the CGI whiz-bang of a lot of its contemporaries, instead opting for a grittier, more intense feel created through road-mounted cameras capturing skidding tires and harrowing in-vehicle camera work. In one more thing that separates it from the pack of spy thrillers, there’s little emphasis on tech. Technology certainly plays a vital role — there’s an entire scene devoted to the group discussing cars, guns, and electronic gadgetry — but it’s not the superspy comic bookish type of Mission Impossible gear. In fact, there’s a greater emphasis on simplicity and reliability, avoiding the unrealistic gewgaws that are found in most spy flicks. Frequently they simply improvise to accomplish a task… Jason Bourne had a rolled up magazine, Sam has a cup of coffee. It’s perfectly summarized when the stoic Sam plainly states, “It’s just a tool box. You pick the tool for the job.”

As with the rest of the movie, there’s no wise-cracking, no showboating, no jokes at the moment of resolution. In fact, it’s for this very reason that one of the crew is so quickly recognized as a poseur, a wannabe who’s more likely to get them killed than be any kind of asset. These are workers, soldiers with no room for flash or style points, and it’s the type of movie that only a special kind of director can handle. In fact, Ronin is a relatively humorless picture; other than the occasional dry riposte, the only thing resembling comic relief coming from the always-wonderful Jean Renos. Yet his is a wry, tired humor, as if he realizes the dour surrounding and halfheartedly attempts to brighten it. If there is a weak performance to be found, it’s probably Skarsgård, who while trying his very best and probably fighting against his nature, still manages to ham-fist his way through a couple of scenes. However, he’s still mostly fine, and pointing it out is just me being persnickety. Sean Bean is brilliant as the high-strung, squirrelly x-factor and the rest of the cast is equally solid. However, De Niro truly is the standout — his Sam is a cunning, deliberate veteran, a cagey antihero who stays alive by seeing all the angles. It’s the De Niro we wish we could see in all of his films.

Ronin sometimes feels like it’s a little overlooked in the spy film canon, a situation that needs immediate remedying. While I certainly enjoy the non-stop ass-kickery of the Bourne films, and enjoyed the kabooms and gizmos of the Mission Impossibles (not MI:2, which is a goddamn blight on that series and on film in general), sometimes they seem a bit much. However, if you want a break from the overblown and overwrought, from the pyrotechnics and shaky-cams, and instead want something a bit more subtle and contemplative, Ronin will fill that need. I can’t say that I know anything about the spy game, but if I had to imagine what their capers were really like, I’d hazard that it’s more akin to the dark rooms and cunning, calculated connivances of this excellent film.

TK can be found wandering aimlessly through suburban Massachusetts, wondering how the hell he got there while yelling at the kids on his lawn. You can find him raising the dead in preparation for world domination at Uncooked Meat.


20 Best Seasons of the Last 20 Years | Croupier





Comments

for some reason the main link to this page isn't working for me. i had to click on the comments link to load the review.

Posted by: s.eth at August 28, 2008 2:39 PM

"...an excellent combination of slow buildup and big payoffs."

That's exactly what my expectations were for the Senior Prom...and that's exactly when I learned that no matter what your expectations are, the combined brainwashing forces of Catholisism and overprotective parents will always stand in the way of them.

Posted by: Mike R. at August 28, 2008 2:43 PM

Loved this film, especially since it didn't leave me feeling insulted or gypped (hello shorty Cruise and your festering MI2). And damn, TK, you use your keyboard purtier than a $20 chat room girl. Good review!

" "...an excellent combination of slow buildup and big payoffs."

That's exactly what my expectations were for the Senior Prom...and that's exactly when I learned that no matter what your expectations are, the combined brainwashing forces of Catholisism and overprotective parents will always stand in the way of them. "

Somewhere in there is a "that's what she said" joke, but I'm too distracted to find it.

Posted by: lordhelmet at August 28, 2008 3:00 PM

You have no idea how many times I bring up Ronin and have a confused look returned to me. It's an unknown masterpiece. And yet, amongst those who have seen it, I bring it up and everybody gets excited and starts talking about it. This, to me, is De Niro's finest moment. I love Reno and Bean, and you're right, the whole movie and cast and direction work together perfectly like a well-run machine. I especially like that there's a slight twist at the end, like something half-expected but still coming out of nowhere. Beautiful review, TK...you do this great movie justice.

I guess we'll keep you around a little bit longer.

Posted by: Shadows of Dakaron at August 28, 2008 3:05 PM

lordhelmet, I think it would be more like a "that's what they said" joke, seeing as there seemed to be a conspiracy to keep me a virgin through my four years of High School.

Posted by: Mike R. at August 28, 2008 3:06 PM

I've had this in my Netflix queue forever. And ever. Like, since I subscribed. In 2003. Bumping up!

I love Jean Reno so much.

Posted by: Julie at August 28, 2008 3:09 PM

TK, it also helps that the car chase scene was batshit insane. Also, its hard not to love Reno and DeNiro together in that movie. The Grasshopper discussion is always fun to listen to.

Shame Stellan Skarsgård went from making movies like this and Good Will Hunting to baring his ass for laughs to Mrs. Weasley in Mamma Mia. (hangs head in shame)

Posted by: Mike R. at August 28, 2008 3:10 PM

Blame MI:2 on John Woo, not Cruise.

Posted by: tc at August 28, 2008 3:17 PM

I'm always suggesting this movie to my friends and they always look at me quizzically. When I mention that it has the best car chase scene ever they show a little more interest. I particularly like the abrupt end to the chase. Right at the point that most car chase scenes get ridiculous, this one comes to a screeching halt in a most realistic manner.

Posted by: the_wakeful at August 28, 2008 3:18 PM

That's a negative. There's no atrocity too mind-bogglingly bad that can't be blamed on The Insane One.

Posted by: Shadows of Dakaron at August 28, 2008 3:19 PM

I most certainly agree that this film has one of the all-time great car chases, which is criminally under-recognized, and I enjoyed it overall more than the third 'Bourne' movie.

The Robert DeNiro in this film is a quickly-fading memory, so if you haven't seen it, enjoy it while you can: its not likely he'll be doing anything comparable to this (or 'Jackie Brown', and I hate that movie aside from his performance) for the rest of his self-trashed "legacy." Poor bastard.

Posted by: TMax at August 28, 2008 3:20 PM

Blame MI:2 on John Woo, not Cruise.

Posted by: tc at August 28, 2008 3:17 PM

Blame Paramount, TC, they made John Woo cut his 3.5 hour film. True, this isn't the ideal length for an M:I movie, but at least it would have made sense.

Posted by: Mike R. at August 28, 2008 3:23 PM

I'm down with that

Posted by: tc at August 28, 2008 3:33 PM

I have loved this movie since it I saw it in the theatre. While we love Jason Bourne because he can use a rolled up newspaper to take out a guy or have a knife fight with a pen, it's the plodders of the spy world that are always the most interesting. Spartan is another film, and not totally surprisingly a David Mamet film, that evokes the same feel as Ronin.

Posted by: JakesAlterEgo at August 28, 2008 3:38 PM

While I don't make it a habit of agreeing with the bucket of scum, who wrote this piece (there's no accounting for taste in this site)...I HAVE to give props to this film.
Some of the best shootouts on film, best car chase after Bullit, plotting, chemistry, "Euro-flavor" which is so necessary for this type of flick (and one of the reasons I love MI-1,) the pacing is right on. If you get the Special Edition DVD listen to the commentary, you'll learn something about how the real master do smart action.

A true modern classic.

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at August 28, 2008 3:47 PM

"Whenever there is any doubt, there is no doubt. That's the first thing they teach you.
Who taught you?
I don't remember. That's the second thing they teach you."

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at August 28, 2008 3:49 PM

Enjoyed the Fugazi reference!

Posted by: Megan at August 28, 2008 3:50 PM

Jesus. Between this and yesterday's Blockbuster, I might have to start frequenting this site more often.

That, TK, that was my favorite review of yours. Nice friggin' job, indeed. I love this movie. I actually just saw it again Tuesday night - I had planned on going grocery shopping, and as I type this, my fridge is still bare. I saw this in the theaters, and immediately returned for the car chase (because the first time, we were too damned close to the screen). This is a perfect flick, and Mister Man, you wrote a goddamed perfect review. Should we ever meet, I owe you a stiff drink.

Posted by: Skittimus Maximus at August 28, 2008 4:07 PM

what about flamboyant, cartoonishly queer De Niro ala Stardust

I loved him there

Posted by: Thaf at August 28, 2008 4:19 PM

One night in college, I argued the merits of the film with this tubby girl we referred to as The Anchor. The one reason she gave for hating it was that the contents of the briefcase are never revealed. I never felt bad about that nickname.

Posted by: ps at August 28, 2008 4:24 PM

One of the main reasons why I love me some Bobby D is because likes exotic women (the republican definition of exotic though).

Posted by: Pookie at August 28, 2008 4:25 PM

I read in an interview with Frankenheimer that the briefcase contained a combination of thirteen secret spices that would liven up any meal.

Posted by: Skittimus Maximus at August 28, 2008 4:28 PM

I couldn't agree more with this review. The car chase scene(s) in this movie are the best ever. The chase in Bourne Supremacy and Bourne Ultimatum are excellent, but these are the best. I think the use of REAL cars and REAL cameras instead of CGI is the key. The only thing I don't really like about this movie is the climax--the whole skating exhibition thing. That was the only psuedo-cheesy part of an otherwise flawless movie. I watch this one every time it comes on.

Posted by: Hoof Hearted at August 28, 2008 4:53 PM

Hey Julie, you should ask Noah (another frequent Pajiban), to show you his picture of him as Janet Reno for Halloween.

It's uncanny, I tell you.

Posted by: The Pink Hulk at August 28, 2008 4:59 PM

HA!

Posted by: Julie at August 28, 2008 5:02 PM

Good job, TK. I love this movie. I tried to steal it from my parents but I had to give it back.

Posted by: jM at August 28, 2008 5:22 PM

I agree with 99% of TK's review. I would just say there was actually quite a bit of wisecracking.

Sam: So, how'd you get started in this business?
Dierdre: A wealthy scoundrel seduced and betrayed me.
Sam: Same with me. How about that?

Spence: You ever kill anybody?
Sam: I hurt somebody's feelings once.

Posted by: JP at August 28, 2008 5:40 PM

Love this movie, but this is the first time I heard about Mamet's involvement; should have figured it out before. No bloatware in this sleeper. And when that big Audi S8 goes sliding around the corner in Nice, I get goosebumps; who needs CGI when you've got stunt drivers like this. Speaking of Mamet, if you haven't checked out "Heist" with Gene Hackman, recommend to all that you do so immediately -- also very economical filmmaking, in the best sort of way.

Posted by: Torgotronic at August 28, 2008 5:46 PM

I'm gonna have to see it again. I saw this in a theater and the volume was so loud it gave me a migraine. Easily the loudest movie I have ever seen in a theater. So the blinding pain has tainted my view on it. But I've seen it in pieces on TV and have thought I should revisit it. I didn't realize Mamet wrote it, but it should have been obvious looking back on it. And Spartan and Heist are great Mamet movies, too. I'm not sure if he has made/written a bad movie yet to be honest.

Posted by: TylerDFC at August 28, 2008 6:25 PM

De Niro seems to be a curious person by the movies he does. But curiousity has done amazing things for the world. And hit and miss isn't so bad, as long as when you hit, you hit hard, like De Niro. And like: though the related early morning question has long since been cliche, pissing in someone's Corn Flakes is always a great way to start your day. Your room-mate most likely will not agree, but balls if you can stop laughing long enough to care.

Posted by: DannyOnTrial at August 28, 2008 7:33 PM

Ditto, ditto, great movie, blah, blah, blah

Can I just point out how immensely HOT Natasha McElhone is in this movie? I was about ready to go hunting for mysterious cases my damn self after seeing her, and I am no Bobby D.

Posted by: Vermillion at August 28, 2008 7:54 PM

Great review, almost a love letter, for a completely underrated movie. Speaking of underrated, I thought Natasha McElhone was a revelation here. Tough, sexy, unreadable...thought her performance deserved a mention. Nice work.

Posted by: jaytwo at August 28, 2008 8:03 PM

A couple years after my father died, I watched this movie on HBO one night. When I told my mother about watching it and how I suspected my dad would have loved it, she said "Oh, he did." He had apparently seen it shortly before his death.

Since, I have always loved this movie and I've wondered if my personal connection to it was clouding my judgement. I guess I can stop that.

Posted by: Just Joe at August 28, 2008 8:39 PM

Great, great film. And that car chase was phenomenal! When I found out how they did it I was so disappointed, as it ruins the effect on repeated viewings.


The cars were going about 5 mph. They just speeded up the film.


Still a fav though.

Actually, from what I understand, only the shots with the actors in the frame were shot at that speed, thus allowing the actors to do some authentic-looking driving. Otherwise, they utilized stunt drivers who actually drove at relatively breakneck speeds. -TK

Posted by: vaskark at August 28, 2008 9:21 PM

My bad :(

Posted by: vaskark at August 28, 2008 9:59 PM

"Give him a grasshopper..."

Posted by: rapanui at August 29, 2008 12:10 AM

Bad-ass car chases, too.

Posted by: Some Guy at August 29, 2008 1:17 AM

There is a sex scene in this movie? It must be so short that I missed it every time I saw it.

Does it involve Natasha McElhone? If yes: damn!

Posted by: FabMax at August 29, 2008 7:02 AM

Has De Niro played a police detective? I feel like there should be a trilogy with this and "Midnight Run" of the weary professional in an old leather jacket. "*sigh*....you assholes are gonna fuck this up". I saw this when it came out and it was strange at the time. A relatively Dogme 95 James Bond. "What are you...a character study with occasional gunshots? A bunch of old guys in an action movie?" It was something unique, although with no flashy lures so it's deceptive and might not stick in the memory at first glance. I probably need to see it again and watch the actors. I thought it was pretty good but it didn't stay with me.

Oh and McElhone ain't shabby. A definite frisson, if you will, when she popped up in "The Truman Show". Needs to get herself back out there!

Posted by: Jay at August 29, 2008 9:01 AM

Well done TK! I fought sleep to read your review, I was so excited upon seeing it! Easily my favourite action/suspence flick. From the moment I saw this film I wanted an Audi S8. Slick car chases, realistic gun battles... Bliss!

Posted by: JQ at August 29, 2008 9:25 AM

Great movie.

I saw this in the theater and was blown away with what simplicity it wrapped a tight yarn (Oh, Mamet. That explains it).

This is what makes me upset about DVDs though. I bought it on DVD and they had an "Alternate Ending". I watched it, and it was a mistake. There's such a great (consistent) ambiguity at the end, a very courageous move, but showing the (written and shot) ending has ruined the mystery. If you've never seen it, avoid it. It will actually take away from your experience.

Posted by: John at August 29, 2008 10:26 AM

Anyone still reading this? Cool...


Ronin is Japanese for a samurai without a master, yet this film is master to me. Well, the DeNiro in this film is master to most other DeNiros that happen to appear in subsequent films.

Posted by: Kash at August 30, 2008 12:26 AM

One of my favorites, though it reminds me of Heat and The Score.

Posted by: Protoguy at August 30, 2008 4:01 AM

Wait...a review that contrasts Good DeNiro with Bad DeNiro and makes its case for Good DeNiro with 90s movies (with the exception of the Godfather II)???

Do you have no conception of film history?

Have you never heard of Good Scorsese?

Because if not, let's just clear this up: Good DeNiro is the one who starred in Mean Streets, Taxi Driver, and (perhaps the best performance I've ever seen, and one from which he never recovered)Raging Bull.

Posted by: elle at August 30, 2008 9:27 PM

Dear Elle: I pulled four titles basically out of a hat. Don't be so presumptuous. -TK

Posted by: TK at August 31, 2008 8:03 AM

FIGHT! FIGHT! FIGHT!

what are you waiting for?...FINISH HER!

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at August 31, 2008 2:36 PM

Blame MI:2 on John Woo, not Cruise.

Posted by: tc at August 28, 2008 3:17 PM

Maybe, but by the name of Xenu the Demented Dimunitive Dynamo is responsible for everything else.

I have yet to see Ronin through from start to finish but I feel its pull -- missed it in the theater, got pulled from a DVD viewing after the start, and then caught it in the middle on cable one night. That's what I like about these Blockbuster (and Boozehound Cinephile) reviews: they provide much needed focus to my video rental list.

Posted by: Che Grovera at August 31, 2008 2:54 PM

I don't know how to do this quoting thing, so I'll just awkwardly say:

I pulled four titles basically out of a hat.

Right, but it seemed to me that even a somewhat random selection should include at least one of his undisputed greatest roles. Clearly I'm just overly invested in a once-great, now has-been actor, and want to see him get credit for what once was. Sigh.

Posted by: elle at August 31, 2008 11:36 PM





Video ads popping up after each page view? Try clearing your browser's cookies.