outbreak-morganfreeman.jpg
Viral Twist and Shout


Outbreak / Steven Lloyd Wilson

Pajiba Blockbusters | July 8, 2009 | Comments (24)


“You have to love its simplicity. It’s one-billionth our size and it’s beating us.” — Sam Daniels

Ah, the nineties. It was a simpler time, an innocent time. Before texting, tweens, and tweeting. When men were men and phones plugged into walls. Original ideas were so rare that sometimes studios took the most promising pitch and made two films just to be sure. They hit you like double tap headshots of blockbuster: Wyatt Earp! Volcanoes! Asteroids! And the year we found out that it was actually Ebola that would kill us all, we almost got two simultaneous virus films. Fox and Ridley Scott tried to make Hot Zone but Robert Redford and Jody Foster bickered about the script until they both quit. Just to make all of you aspiring writers drink more: the screenwriter hired to adapt Hot Zone from a book to a screenplay was paid $500,000. You know what’s holding us back? We keep using all those other keys instead of “control”, “c” and “v.”

In any case, Outbreak won the race to theaters and featured one of the most talented casts ever assembled for a middling popcorn flick. They managed to cast Dustin Hoffman, Rene Russo, Kevin Spacey, Cuba Gooding Jr., Morgan Freeman and Donald Sutherland, thus setting the world record for number of Oscars per minutes of suck. They also retroactively pulled off the unintentional hilarity of Patrick Dempsey at the absolute nadir of his post-teen heartthrob, pre-McDreamy career. If they’d just included Kevin Bacon, his game would need two less degrees.

Outbreak starts out with an intriguing first act that creeps along like a horror movie, moving with absolute certainty towards that inevitable point when a super virus starts liquefying internal organs en masse. The second act starts to trip over itself as the virus is apparently identified and contained within a small town on the California coast. The third act becomes a ludicrous chase flick of army guys in helicopters, culminating in moralizing as awkward as the big dance at a summer camp for kids with crippling social anxiety.

The mistake is in making Donald Sutherland an unlikable and unreasonable antagonist instead of the virus. Here’s a lesson for all scriptwriters: flip your film on its head and make the antagonist the protagonist while you’re writing it. Write and rewrite draft after draft of the script until the antagonist makes just as much sense as the protagonist. That’s the point at which we as an audience care about the decisions of the characters, when we agonize over the moral quandary with the protagonist instead of just rooting against the antagonist.

When they work, twists in a story can rip your guts out and show them to you, make you reexamine everything that came before. In a bad story, the twist is just a coward’s way out of the implications of the story. It causes you to conclude that everything that happened before simply didn’t matter. Oh how scary, the bad general wants to kill a bunch of Americans and keep the virus as a biological weapon. Yeah, OK Darth Vader, whatever. You know what’s really scary? A virus that is airborne and kills everyone who gets it within 24 hours. But you know, I can see where Donald Sutherland’s soulless eyes could be scary too.

It’s not a creative twist to rip the story in an unexpected direction with a straw man antagonist to worry about instead of the original actual horror. It’s like the original script had this psychotic unstoppable virus and the writer scared himself shitless and wrote a cure and an asshole fall guy to make himself sleep better. The narrative structure of the film is essentially:

1. Eek! A killer virus!
2. Whew, good thing we’ve figured out a plan for dealing with it.
3. Eek! A psycho general!

While the lesson that sociopathic generals with hard-ons for bio-warfare and firebombing are the real danger may be a good story in another movie, it’s not the story that this movie set out to tell. In other words, if you make a movie called Outbreak, I’m thinking that the real bad guy should be the fucking outbreak.

The story problems remind me of season 2 of “24,” in which terrorists try to nuke Los Angeles. Around the two-thirds mark of the season, the nuke is safely blown up in the desert and the evidence that a bunch of Middle Eastern states conspired to make it happen turns out to be a forgery by an evil cabal in the American government. Twist! It’s the easy way out: evil cabals are easy for television to deal with, but the actual moral implications of what the government should do in response to a nuclear attack by a foreign country is really hard to handle. But the having balls to try is the stuff of truly great stories. Outbreak backs away from the tough and interesting drama by refusing to answer the question: What if they can’t find a cure?

In real life, they don’t find a cure in time. Look up Ebola or Marburg or the half dozen other hemorrhagic fevers that explode out of the African jungle and lay waste to a village in a week every few years. Finding the host animal and producing an antiserum from its blood in 20 minutes isn’t even throwing up a hail mary, it’s kicking a field goal from your own goal line through a blizzard with only two players on the field, neither of whom is the kicker. Oh, and if you miss the field goal, everyone in the stands will die.

The horror science fiction story that they could have told in this movie would have been legendary. Screw having the virus nail a small and fundamentally quarantinable town in Northern California. Drop that fucker in downtown Los Angeles or Manhattan. Force the characters to make a truly agonizing decision. Make the situation so horrific that nuking the site from orbit seems to be the best moral choice available.

In short, if you really want viral apocalypse porn, just go back and re-read the first couple hundred pages of The Stand.

“Oh, Christ, guys, if you think I’m lying, drop the bomb. If you think I’m crazy, drop the bomb. But don’t drop the bomb just because you’re following orders!” -Sam Daniels

Steven Lloyd Wilson is the last scion of Norse warriors and the forbidden elder gods. He is a hopeless romantic who can be found wandering San Diego’s strip malls and suburbs looking for his mislaid soul and waiting for the revolution to come. Burning Violin is still published weekly on Wednesdays at www.burningviolin.com, along with assorted fiction and other ramblings.


Pajiba Love 07/08/09 | Words of Wisdom from 80s Comedies





Comments

I am so glad you called out this lazy piece of crap for what it is. I was expecting some sort of rationalization that its idiocy somehow made it awesome. Thank you.

Posted by: ed newman at July 8, 2009 2:18 PM

No mention of J. T. Walsh? For shame, sir!

Posted by: Todd at July 8, 2009 2:20 PM

Steven, I'm really liking your posts and comments.

Although IIRC Shyamalan did what you suggest (drop a poison [made by trees!?!] in the middle of a big city) and how did that turn out?

Posted by: , (the commenter formerly known as bucdaddy) at July 8, 2009 2:24 PM

Eh. I've always had a thing for Outbreak.

But when you dumb it down to your three step narrative explanation, I understand where you are coming from. Still pretty damn entertaining nonetheless.

Donald Sutherland was more bad-ass in The Puppet Masters. They should have kept him as a scientist with a cane for this movie as well.

Posted by: Colin at July 8, 2009 2:24 PM

HA! I remember this stupid, stupid movie. The fanfare that breaks out when they get the monkey. ANTHONY EDWARDS IS INFECTED OH NOES!

Rene Russo and Dustin Hoffman...a couple? The hell?

What a dumb movie.

And since you mention The Stand...am I the only one who would love to see a proper remake of that? Or rather, an actual movie adaptation of it?

Posted by: figgy at July 8, 2009 2:26 PM

I had pretty well forgotten this movie was ever made, though I can still probably summarize the plot line if Alex Trebeck asked me for $400 (remembering to phrase my response in the form of a question).

It must be a slow movie day.

Most memorable scene: near the beginning where the obviously feverish grad school schlub offers his half-eaten airline cookie to the hungry toddler in the seat next to him, but the kid's mom pulls him back at the last moment, thereby saving both their lives.

Pretty much explains the entire story arc of the movie from that point on -- no one we really care about is going to die.

(Possible movie axiom: No one ever cares if Kevin Spacey dies.)

Posted by: Neodiogenes at July 8, 2009 2:29 PM

Hmmm. Rene Russo. Ginger. Yum.

Posted by: Xtreme at July 8, 2009 2:31 PM

I will watch this movie every time it comes on. I can't turn away. I've probably seen it twenty times and I LOVE IT. Medicine! Morgan Freeman! Helicopter antics! I also admit to having a lady crush on Rene Russo.

Posted by: Nicole at July 8, 2009 2:33 PM

All right, it's suckitude, but I have to confess that the overemphasized scene in the movie theater, showing the killer virus being expelled out of the mouth of one infected person and into the lungs of EVERYONE IN THE THEATER, still gives me the bad kind of goose bumps.

And I didn't even SEE it in the theater.

Ugh. I need to go wash my hands. And maybe the inside of my nose.

Posted by: Meggrs at July 8, 2009 2:39 PM

Speaking *of* outbreaks, super skeevy-ness and needing to wash one's
hands ...

WHO does a redhead have to pay to get that nasty 'ol Pam Anderson movie
advert OFF of my screen up there?!

It's been days now and I've run out of little pink liquid. Urp.

Posted by: Ms MoMo at July 8, 2009 2:50 PM

I loved The Hot Zone. I couldn't put it down, and I drove my family crazy by quoting the horrible gory details to them. This movie... I'll watch it when it's on, but the book is infinitely better. It's actually one of the reasons I went to college intending to major in biology. I wanted to work in the CDC, Level 4, working on the lethal viruses. Then I realized I hate lab work, switched to psychology, and now work part-time for a home furnishings company. If you'll excuse me, I need to go drink 'til I can't feel feelings again.

Posted by: MelBivDevoe at July 8, 2009 2:54 PM

This movie absolutely sucked for all the reasons you describe and more. I agree completely on the quality of the three acts. The setup is decent, and it unravels from there. By the time they reach the game of chicken with the helicopter, the whole thing was laughable.

Your advice for improving this movie (and movies in general) is sound. What inspired the revisiting of this particular movie?

Posted by: DarthCorleone at July 8, 2009 3:04 PM

I agree totally--think of the moral complexity in Dr. Strangelove, where faced with the situation as it was the U.S. had to decide whether to go through with an all-out strike (the immoral yet perhaps least costly decision) versus risking total annihilation by helping to shoot down our own pilots. A real dilemma with no clear cut answer.

Related to this I think is also the concept in every horror movie that there's a simple answer (usually some biological experiment gone wrong), when some of the best stuff has no known answer (take The Birds--why did the birds start attacking? Who knows, just get away from them!).

Posted by: Bd at July 8, 2009 3:14 PM

Figgy...no, you're not the only one, I'd love to see a good version of the Stand. The miniseries was just too uneven for me, even though King did write it. Maybe the BBC could do a decent job of it?

Posted by: dawn at July 8, 2009 3:48 PM

Well said on all counts.

But what still sticks with me more than anything else from that movie was the dialogue. It seemed as though not a single scene could go by without an actor making a statement that seemed ripped from an over-the-top medical drama like ER: stuff like "Whey don't you just for once take a chance?" "Don't you know, I did, I married you."

They sort of fall between zingers and "profound" pronouncements. One or two in a movie is fine, but this glorified made-for-TV dreck had at least one in every fucking scene.

Posted by: Cat at July 8, 2009 4:58 PM

Haha I had forgot this movie and then assumed it was some Michael Crichton piece of crap, the only two that were good from him were Jurassic Park and The 13th Warrior (if you diss Warrior I will find you and cleave you with a claymore).

Then I realized it wasn't by him and so the insulting was really not going to make any sense.

And since you mention The Stand...am I the only one who would love to see a proper remake of that? Or rather, an actual movie adaptation of it?

I thought the miniseries stuck pretty close to the book. As for an adaptation into an actual movie? That bitch would have to be at the least 4 hours long right?

Posted by: DeistBrawler at July 8, 2009 6:00 PM

Steven Lloyd Wildon - I bought (and read) your book Katorga - and I loved it - thanks-- it was perfect - short , sweet and not-so-sweet and to the point and not one boring word thanks - - written anything else ?

Posted by: m bolton at July 8, 2009 6:15 PM

The host of the virus was a capuchin monkey, which was caught in Africa. That's ok, except the fact that capuchin monkeys are not found in Africa. They come from Central and South America. Thus, the movie was flawed to begin with.

Posted by: Emran at July 8, 2009 7:19 PM

Aren't Pajiba Blockbusters supposed to be good movies that we like?

Posted by: dg at July 8, 2009 7:20 PM

m bolton: It goes without saying that you are now the best commenter in the history of Internet commenting. Though it is possible that I am slightly biased. I have an agreement with Mrs. SLW that I will not publish another novel until I break even on Katorga (which is 37 copies from happening). That said, I am publishing another of my novels A Fire in their Eyes page by page on my website and I do hope to have a sequel to Katorga finished by the end of the summer (unemployment has some perks after all) and off to the publisher.

As to where this review came of apropos of nothing: I re-stumbled across this film as it started on AMC (an increasingly misnamed channel) a couple of weeks ago and the problems with it irritated me for a week like an itchy scab.

As to The Stand: oh I would do wicked things to get HBO or BBC to do a solid R-rated twenty hour take on this. The mini-series was an odd beast. It wasn't badly written or directed for the most part, it was just so horribly miscast that it was unwatchable. In particular there were some fairly decent actors that just in no way resembled their characters. Gary Sinise as Stu? Molly Ringwald as Fran? Corin Nemec as Harold?

Posted by: Steven Lloyd WilsonAuthor Profile Page at July 8, 2009 7:22 PM

Oh lordy, how I loved this movie back in the day...it's probably best that I never, never watch it again, huh?

Posted by: meaux at July 8, 2009 7:29 PM

Woo good thing I'm not the only one. I think the most WTF bit of casting was Laura whatshername as Nadine. So, so very wrong. And Rob Lowe. And...OK just about everyone. That was horrible casting. But it would be fantastic with a decent budget, some "28 Days Later" visuals and a solid cast of unknowns.

Posted by: figgy at July 8, 2009 7:56 PM

Every infectious disease-based film/TV show loses me when a key character (preferably the cute chick) is accidentally infected and manages to not die at the same rate of everybody else while they find a cure.

Posted by: PaddyDog at July 9, 2009 9:41 AM

This movie was filmed in the next town over from me so I know a lot of people who were extras. Even THEY think it sucks.

Posted by: Major Etiquette at July 9, 2009 2:31 PM





Video ads popping up after each page view? Try clearing your browser's cookies.