free counter with statistics Ghostbusters II Review | Pajiba - Scathing Reviews for Bitchy People

gbtwo1sm.jpg
They Came. They Saw. They Sort Of Kicked Ass.


Ghostbusters II / Agent Bedhead

Pajiba Blockbusters | April 7, 2009 | Comments (35)


It was the summer of 1989. The much-anticipated sequel, Ghostbusters II, grossed $112 million, which was only half as much as its predecessor. Despite a record-breaking opening weekend, director Ivan Reitman and screenwriters Harold Ramis and Dan Aykroyd were unable to equal the success of the original Ghostbusters film. Ramis and Aykroyd do deserve credit for attempting to steer this second round of paranormal activity in a different and novel direction, but, unfortunately, the sequel eventually devolves into schtick by poorly replicating many of the gags from the original film. The main problem with all of this is that, while the first film managed to work in spite of and perhaps because of these bits of absurdity, the sequel lacks the off-the-cuff feeling, along with all the gloriously rampant destruction, of the first film. Overall, the momentum and novelty of the first movie was difficult (if not impossible) to preserve, and the sequel, quite simply, just isn’t nearly as enjoyable as the original.

Compared to its predecessor, Ghostbusters II is a darker film, but it almost has to be that because the characters are much more cynical now. After all, it’s been a full five years since the four Ghostbusters — Dr. Peter Venkman (Bill Murray), Dr. Raymond Stantz (Dan Aykroyd), Dr. Egon Spengler (Harold Ramis), and Winston Zeddemore (Ernie Hudson) — blew the top off a high-rise apartment building in New York City. Things are a bit more complicated now, because, despite the fact the apocalypse had been avoided, the Ghostbusters aren’t treated with the superhero gloves that we would expect. Instead, they were slapped with lawsuits from “every state, county, and city agency in New York,” and their subsequent financial ruin forced them out of business. So, the first act of the sequel establishes how things have changed for the Ghostbusters professionally and on a societal level. As such, they’re no longer the self-made superheroes from the end of the first film. In fact, their entreprenial spirit has backfired upon them, and they’ve been recast as frauds, who are only interested in fighting the paranormal for their own commercial benefit.

When we reacquaint ourselves with Ray and Winston, we find out that, instead of heading out on a routine paranomral run, these guys are doing their Ghostbuster routine at a birthday party for “[u]ngrateful yuppie larvae.” As one child tells them, the adults in New York now perceive the Ghostbusters as “full of crap.” Thus, New York City has turned on the Ghostbusters, and the sentiment that ended the first film — Winston Zeddmore’s declaration of “I love this town!” — has morphed into the discovery of a slime river, generated by the city’s negative energy, flowing underground and Zeddmore’s skeptical reaction, “New York - what a town, huh?” As for the other Ghostbusters, only Egon has regained credibility and as a scientific researcher. Poor Peter Venkman is hosting a paranormal talk show, and he’s considered to be such a fraud that only the weirdest crackpot psychics will come on his program.

On a more personal note, things aren’t so great for Venkman either, for he Dana Barrett (Sigourney Weaver) and have long since broken up, that is, after getting to know each other in the light of day, so to speak. Of course, it turns out that Dana had been correct about Venkman all along, for he has fulfilled that infamous “game show host” vibe. Between films, Dana remarried and had a child, but this marriage conveniently dissolves, mostly so she and Venkman can further pursue their mutual lingering feelings. Speaking of rapport, as in the first film, the chemistry between the four Ghostbusters remains intact despite their differing circumstances. Namely, Venkman continues to lead the group and provide deadpan humor at the oddest of moments, such as this discussion of the mood slime:

Egon: We’ve been running tests to see if we can get an equally positive reaction.
Venkman: What kind of tests?
Ray: Well, we sing to it, and, uh, we talk to it, and say supportive, nurturing things to it.
Venkman: You’re not sleeping with it, are you, Ray?
[Ray looks at Egon, who looks away in obvious discomfort.]
Venkman: Oh, you….
Winston: It’s always the quiet ones.
Venkman: You hound!

Besides these sort of exchanges, there are some pretty great moments in Ghostbusters II, including the underground ghost train that runs through Winston and the very late arrival of the S.S. Titanic. In addition, when the Ghostbusters are finally allowed to reclaim their superhero status, the film does grow viable legs for several consecutive scenes. An amusing side note here concerns the decision of Mayor Lenny (David Margulies) to, once again, back the Ghostbusters thanks to the influence of the ghost of former New York Mayor Fiorello La Guardia, the populist who was largely responsible for cracking down on city government corruption and also driving mobsters out of New York City. That little bit of history works a convenient extension to rid the city of paranormal activity, but, unfortunately, the script treats La Guardia as a mere afterthought, which causes his relevance to fly right past a bewildered audience.

Finally, it must be acknowledged there are several aspects of Ghostbusters II that drag the sequel into the realm of stupidity, and most of these elements take place in the third act of the film. After intermingling some fairly heavy social issues with the whole paranormal angle, the sequel quickly shifts gears in a futile attempt at deus ex machina. We are supposed to accept that, when the Ghostbusters use positively charged slime to bring the Statue of Liberty to life, New Yorkers will feel so wonderful that this will somehow obliterate the negative energy of the slime river. Then, after Vigo the Carpathian (Wilhelm von Homburg) paralyzes the Ghostbusters, the citizens of New York save the world by singing “Auld Lang Syne,” a resolution that simply carries none of the kickassery that the first Ghostbusters pulled off. Furthermore, while the Statue of Liberty was clearly intended as a throwback to the to the Stay-Puft Marshmallow Man, there’s just no excuse for that shit. I do hope the makers of the upcoming third film realize that Mr. Stay-Puft cannot be topped or even equaled.

Agent Bedhead lives in Tulsa, Oklahoma and can be found at agentbedhead.com.


The Most Unintentionally Homoerotic Films | The 100 Unsexiest Men of 2009



Comments

... and Ghostbusters III is guaranteed to make this look like Shakespeare.

Posted by: twig at April 7, 2009 3:50 PM

I don't think it was that bad actually, Peter MacNicol gets major props for his Dr. Janosz character. It was like a pervert, effeminate, Igor.

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at April 7, 2009 3:53 PM

"Bring me a child, so that I may live again!

Posted by: Julie at April 7, 2009 3:53 PM

My favorite Ghostbusters line:
"Look at those stairs, I wonder where they lead?"
"Up?"

Cracks my shit up every time. It makes no sense whatsoever unless you saw Bill Murray's deadpan response. *sigh*

Also, Agent, there's something weird with the word arrangement going on in the fourth paragraph...

WHO YA GONNA CALL????
GHOSTBUSTERS!!

Posted by: Stella at April 7, 2009 3:54 PM

But I HEART Peter MacNicol and his outrageously bad accent.

Posted by: coveredinbees at April 7, 2009 3:55 PM

I yahm drippings zwiff goo...

Posted by: boo at April 7, 2009 3:59 PM

This movie is the reason why I always laugh a little at mention of Viggo Mortenson.

Posted by: Macafee at April 7, 2009 4:02 PM

@boo Embarrassing-seemingly-unprovoked-at-work giggle provoker!

Posted by: coveredinbees at April 7, 2009 4:04 PM

Let me put on my taped glasses and pull my pants up to my armpits for my nerd response...

I thought the upcoming video game is supposed to be the third installation in the series?

Posted by: dave at April 7, 2009 4:06 PM

Viggy, Viggy, Viggy, you have been a BAD MONKEY!

Posted by: TK at April 7, 2009 4:10 PM

Hey Dave, give me your lunch money.

Posted by: Rhett at April 7, 2009 4:16 PM

Is it wrong that I want to defend this movie with ever fiber of my being? Guess that is what I get for watching this movie everytime it came on HBO when I was a little girl. Plus, I loved the Titanic arriving. I was such a history teacher, even in the third grade. However, I do agree that the first one is better by far. Although this one is darker, I always was more....um.....frightened with the first one. I was like 8, what can I say? Plus, I love Rick Moranis. Little Giants? Can anyone say PURE GENIUS? Man, I'm such a '90's kid.

Posted by: RayeRaye at April 7, 2009 4:17 PM

I can't criticize this movie too much. Yes, it's no match for the original. Nevertheless, it has some moments of absolute greatness, which mostly depend upon the chemistry of the guys or the simple brilliant delivery of Murray. Even the lousy parts are so campy-silly that they almost work or at least can't be taken so seriously as to deserve hatred.

Posted by: DarthCorleone at April 7, 2009 4:17 PM

I seem to recall Hudson once complaining that he was always positioned so he could be easily cut of out of the shot. It's hard to argue with that logic looking at that poster. He's damn near in a different room.

Posted by: Tracer Bullet at April 7, 2009 4:19 PM

Agent Bedhead, do you think, if we sprayed you with goo (not THAT kind) and played you some Jackie Wilson, you would change your mind about the movie? Cause I really think you should, change your mind...and dance in the streets of NY.

Posted by: coveredinbees at April 7, 2009 4:25 PM

Also, because my sister and I are still not U.S. citizens, we like to occasionally, in the middle of arguments, shout, "Well, you're not gonna get a green card with that attitude, pal!"

Murray is such a glorious asshole in this.

Posted by: TK at April 7, 2009 4:25 PM

This movie is the reason why I always laugh a little at mention of Viggo Mortenson.
Yah, me too. That, "Viggy, Viggy, Viggy, you have been a BAD MONKEY!" thing runs right through my head every damn time, just like how TK demonstrates . .

Posted by: idiosynchronic at April 7, 2009 4:30 PM

O shit, Tracer. That's gonna be like the FedEx arrow. I will never unsee that now.

Posted by: JakesAlterEgo at April 7, 2009 4:31 PM

I can never hate this movie simply for the fact that it spawned such inspired lyrics from Bobby Brown:
Too hot to handle, too cold to hold
They're called the Ghostbusters and they're in control
Had 'em throwin' a party for a bunch of children
While all the while the slime was under the building
So they packed up their group, got a grip, came equipped
Grabbed their proton packs off their back and they split
Found about Vigo, the master of evil
Try to battle my boys? That's not legal

Too hot to handle, too cold to hold...it's like he looked right into my soul.

Posted by: kidtiger at April 7, 2009 4:32 PM

kidtiger, I started singing that in my head as soon as I saw the review! So much cheese, but yet so wonderful!

Posted by: Miss_E at April 7, 2009 4:38 PM

ummmm my mom actually won us tickets to the sneak preview of this movie from a radio station and i looooved it. i also may, or may not, still have the polaroid photo of me standing behind the cardboard cutout of the ghostbusters uniform...and i may, or may not occasionally still take it out and admire my awesome perm in the photo.

Posted by: JenVegas at April 7, 2009 4:40 PM

I was in a theatre with a bunch of friends to watch a completely different movie. We sat behind a row of about 10 children, because they were short and this was before stadium seating. The Ghostbusters II trailer comes on, and the song sang "Who ya gonna call?" and all the kids yelled "GHOSTBUSTERS!" on cue. Cracked us up.

Posted by: BWeaves at April 7, 2009 4:42 PM

I think one of the reasons that the film performed poorly financially (relatively speaking) was that Batman came out like a week later and pretty much owned the box office.

That being said, the sequel seriously pales in comparison to the original. It really didn't help that so much of the plot structure was a carbon copy - like when they catch their first ghosts about half an hour in, become really popular, get locked up by some asshole bureaucrat, have a giant marshmallow man/Lady Liberty rampaging through the city, etc. etc.

They really need to take the third film in a new direction is it's going to have any hope at all.

Posted by: csb at April 7, 2009 4:53 PM

I remember watching this at the theater and being very disappointed. It felt like nothing but a lifeless, half-assed money grab.

Posted by: EricD at April 7, 2009 5:01 PM

Even my 14-year-old video game loving self thought using a Nintendo controller on the Statue of Liberty was pretty dumb.

Posted by: stryker1121 at April 7, 2009 5:50 PM

Named after a hot dog, you poor poor man!

Posted by: rachel at April 7, 2009 6:28 PM

Whatever, I love this movie. No, not as good as the first one, but Peter McNichols (sp?) was hilarious to me, and I enjoy using that voice whenever possible.

Look! Ees VIggo!

By the way, I never USED to laugh at Viggo Mortensen, but now I will. Thanks.

Posted by: Sharon at April 7, 2009 6:28 PM

I'm a voter. Aren't you supposed to lie to me and kiss my butt?

Posted by: rachel at April 7, 2009 6:33 PM

Delurking to say:

So your alien had a room at The Holiday Inn, Paramus?

Posted by: Megs at April 7, 2009 7:13 PM

It might have been a room on the spaceship made up to look like a room at the Holiday Inn. I can't be sure.

Posted by: Sean at April 7, 2009 7:57 PM

Count me amongst the many who memorized this movie thanks to repeat viewings on HBO.

Is it as good as the first movie? No, of course, not. It's unfair to hold those kind of expectations, however, for this one. The original was such a great action/horror/comedy movie.

That said Bill Murray was still at the top of his game (Honestly, did any other actor so embody the 80s as Murray did?) and Aykroyd, Ramis, Reitman and the rest bring their A-game.

And Peter McNichol made for one scary nanny!!

Posted by: Fredo at April 7, 2009 8:01 PM

Slides are awailable in de gift shop!

Posted by: Sean at April 7, 2009 8:02 PM

GB2 sux.

Yes, there are some decent lines that are quite excellent.

Yes, if it were cut down to 30 minutes it might actually be decent.

Pearl Harbor...cut down to 30 minutes, darn good flick if it were done properly.

Too many sequels end up like this one...shitty re-write of the first, second, third etc installment of a series.

Now...the Matrix is different...

The Matrix was decent because they spent a lot of time making a huge MESS of the cutting room floor...

So much so...there was enough crap lying on that floor that someone swept it all into a pile in the middle of the room. Then with many dustpan loads, they dumped it all into the Subpar-Sequels-Make-Us-Easy-$$$-O-Maticâ„¢ machine and POOF 10 minutes later... two horrible sequels(I refuse to watch the third after seeing the crapfest that was the second).

Oh and on topic...

Evolution as I've mentioned before is what I consider to be the true excellent sequel to Ghostbusters. Ghostbusters and Evolution are not Apple and Orange...more like Granny Smith and Red Delicious. There are a lot of similarities that I really need not explain here, but they are definitely closely related.

Similar characters, scenes, plot structure, etc.

Posted by: WhoWhatWhere at April 8, 2009 6:48 AM

I love this movie nearly as much as the original and I'm not ashamed to admit it.

"If you had brain one in that huge melon on top of your neck, you would be living the sweet life out in Southern California's beautiful San Fernando Valley!

It's all in the delivery.

Posted by: feramones at April 8, 2009 12:59 PM

^A^Would you like to give yourself a chance to date an open

minded girl? Yes, I'm that girl. Handsome guys come in, I

have a blog in the web---tallmeet. c o m---this is a good

idea.Happy life is up to U!!!!^c^

Posted by: yx at April 8, 2009 10:46 PM