free counter with statistics Brazil Review | Pajiba - Scathing Reviews for Bitchy People

brazil_babyface.jpg
Not with a Bang but a Whimper


Brazil / Steven Lloyd Wilson

Pajiba Blockbusters | May 13, 2009 | Comments (42)


“Don’t fight it son. Confess quickly! If you hold out too long you could jeopardize your credit rating.” — Guard

Terry Gilliam’s Brazil stands as one of the great dystopian science fiction films, a nightmare of bureaucratic hell that has gradually sharpened over the quarter century since its release into an even more urgent and relevant vision of society. One of the founders of the legendary Monty Python, Gilliam has carved a film-making career out of surreal, deeply thoughtful, and darkly hilarious tales that often wander into the realms of fantasy and science fiction. It’s the humor that makes his films work so well, operating on the same basic principle as Kevin Smith and Joss Whedon: humor enhances a serious topic, it does not distract from it.

Brazil is an explosion of beautiful 50’s retro sci-fi cross pollinated with strands of steam punk. It’s an early exploration of retro-futuristic style, the kind that Fallout and later Bioshock took on in the video game world. It’s what people fifty years ago might imagine the present to look like. Suffocating corridors, vacuum tube and neon electronics, typewriters as keyboards, ubiquitous little flat screens blasting inanity, tiny cars like hatchbacks sent through a trash compactor, ductwork and pipes everywhere.

The film opens on a window display stack of televisions that promptly explode, the first of many inexplicable and sudden explosions throughout the film. After a brief title screen in neon, the camera rotates to capture one of the televisions, still broadcasting though on fire. The dark humor begins with the interview of a government official.

“What do you believe is behind this increase in terrorist bombings?”
“Bad sportsmanship.”


And then…

“How do you account for the fact that the bombing campaign has been going on for thirteen years?”
“Beginners’ luck.”


We switch then to an office worker, listening to the broadcast, annoyed by a buzzing fly amidst typewriters clanging away automatically. He swats the fly, it falls into a typewriter, a “T” changes to a “B,” arrest orders are dispatched for Buttle instead of Tuttle. A horde of armed men storm a cramped apartment. Buttle is hooded, bound, shackled, his terrified wife forced to sign not just a receipt for his arrest, but the bill for his subsequent interrogation, torture and murder.

This is how Gilliam sets the stage for his masterpiece, a stage so bloodily familiar to us today, 1984 updated to reflect the reality of tyranny in the modern state. The archetype of dystopia is the all-seeing, all-knowing state, perfect and meticulous. Sauron in a skyscraper. But the devil is in the details of implementation. Bureaucracies are massive, slow and incompetent, the real tools of the totalitarian state are not sharp and precise but dull and mistake-ridden. Brazil shows us that dreary dystopia on the ground floor, where it’s not so much fear that oppresses the spirit, but a crushing helplessness.

When you watch this film, watch the background, read the random posters and snippets of text, listen to the edges of conversation you catch off screen. Gilliam has thoroughly painted in the details of his world, fleshing out the borders of the screen while the nominal action takes place at the center. The peripheral vision and hearing of the film is extraordinary and provides a number of running themes that manage to worm their way through almost every scene in the film without feeling super imposed.

Duct work runs everywhere in the film, bursting the walls at the seams with beating and breathing apparatuses that reveal more life in the inanimate objects of the world than in most of the dreary and depressed people. Restaurants, offices, apartments, cluttered with ducts, everywhere except the center most parts of the government, because that is the originator of the ducts. It’s a clever metaphor of the way that the state has become an overzealous and dysfunctional mother in the film, umbilical cords running to every citizen at every turn. The heart of every dystopia is a utopia turned on its head. Brazil’s utopia of a mother state caring for all its children is turned upside down into the psychotic bitch mother feeding off of its children. The nurturer twists into a parasite. You can tell a lot about a nation’s vision of utopia by whether the citizens refer to their country as a “motherland,” “fatherland,” or “homeland.”

Our hero is Sam, a mild-mannered cross between Winston Smith and Peter Gibbons, played by Jonathan Pryce, better known as the guy from the Lexus commercials in the 90s. Sam exercises some serious Walter Mitty daydreams throughout the film. He flies on wings blended of feathers and clockwork, fighting giant ductwork samurai and trying to save his dream girl. The dreams blend ever more with reality leading to a tragically depressing twist of the knife at the film’s finale, the pathos of which M. Night Shyamalan has grasped at for the better part of a decade.

The side characters are as clever and well rounded as the background details of the camera work. We are introduced to Harry Tuttle, the man saved by the typo, Robert DeNiro putting in a joyous performance as a renegade repair man, ziplining from building to building repairing the constantly breaking down ductwork like a vigilante plumber version of Batman. Sam’s mother, played with a sadistic and creepy verve by Katherine Helmond (Mona from “Who’s the Boss?”) undergoes a cavalcade of plastic surgery, getting younger and less and less human as the film progresses. Ian Holm is fantastic as Sam’s squirrelly middle manager boss who has veritable nervous breakdowns over glitches in paperwork.

In the end, the film becomes a meditation on state torture and terrorism that rings eerily true to this day. There are no terrorists, except in the imaginations of people like Sam. The explosions become part of the backdrop of society, a horror everyone gets used to, but one that justifies whatever the government wants to do. Torture enables the system. Every person tortured to a confession of terrorism justifies further arrests and torture in order to prevent more terrorism. And of course the hideous baby’s mask, the face of torture. We are just children in this state, even the torturers are just babies throwing tantrums for the benefit of the mother.

Brazil is one of those rare films that not only meditates on larger themes, but does so in a brutally hilarious way. I’d venture to say that it is the best dystopian film I’ve ever seen, simply because Gilliam so intuitively understands that gallows humor drives home the tragic absurdity of a broken world far more deeply than somberness.

Jill: “Say, ‘all wars have innocent victims.’”
Sam: “Well, all wars do…”
Jill: “Who is this war against, Sam?”
Sam: “Well, terrorists of course.”
Jill: “How many terrorists have you met? Actual terrorists?”
Sam: “Actual… terrorists? Well … it’s only my first day.”


Steven Lloyd Wilson is the last scion of Norse warriors and the forbidden elder gods. He is a hopeless romantic who can be found wandering San Diego’s strip malls and suburbs looking for his mislaid soul and waiting for the revolution to come. Burning Violin is still published weekly on Wednesdays at www.burningviolin.com, along with assorted fiction and other ramblings.


"The Alzheimer's Project" Review | Favorite TV Lawyers



Comments

Ah, the banality of evil.

Posted by: twig at May 13, 2009 3:16 PM

One of the BEST films ever made, period.

Funny how while we might not be crowded in by ductwork we are inundated by media and having to be connected all the time.

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at May 13, 2009 3:19 PM

"There are no terrorists, except in the imaginations of people like Sam. The explosions become part of the backdrop of society, a horror everyone gets used to, but one that justifies whatever the government wants to do. Torture enables the system. Every person tortured to a confession of terrorism justifies further arrests and torture in order to prevent more terrorism. And of course the hideous baby’s mask, the face of torture. We are just children in this state, even the torturers are just babies throwing tantrums for the benefit of the mother."

Steven. STEVEN.

I am yours, heart and soul.
(Watch out. The soul might track mud in on your nice clean floor.)

Posted by: boo at May 13, 2009 3:19 PM

better known as the guy from the Lexus commercials in the 90s.

You call him Mr. Dark, doll!


(It was so weird to hear that voice coming out of the now young and gangly looking man a few years later)

Posted by: Jay at May 13, 2009 3:26 PM

i liked the movie (and your review) but in my opinion, parts of the film are really scatterbrained, maybe a little too whimsical. and when he's gettin it on with that lady... its just too unbelievable, like he couldn't convey how an actual meeting of 2 people leads to sex. it was awhile back when i saw it, maybe 6 months, so i cant really remember any examples.

Posted by: farik at May 13, 2009 3:34 PM

I have the 3 disc Criterion Collection of Brazil. I haven't watched it yet, but I obviously should. I do have a question: Should I watch the 94 minute studio cut first or the 142 minute director's cut? Or should I just avoid the 94 minute cut entirely?

Posted by: Pinky McLadybits at May 13, 2009 3:34 PM

Or should I just avoid the 94 minute cut entirely?

That.

Posted by: twig at May 13, 2009 3:49 PM

This film is further proof that the people of Monty Python are our saviors.

Posted by: George at May 13, 2009 3:51 PM

Thanks, twig. I shall follow your advice.

Posted by: Pinky McLadybits at May 13, 2009 3:53 PM

Oh, and nice choice on the Metal Gear Solid 2 quote. You rule stripe.

Posted by: George at May 13, 2009 3:53 PM

"Or should I just avoid the 94 minute cut entirely?"

Pretend it doesn't even exist. Burn it.

Better yet, take that disc, find the studio execs responsible for it, and use the disc to slit their worthless throats. It is an abomination.

This review, however, was fucking aces.

Posted by: TK at May 13, 2009 3:54 PM

DISREGARD what twig said. Watch the "Love conquers all" version first, then Gilliam's cut, it'll be less depressing that way round.

Plus, you learn two valuable lessons:

1. Brazil, even hacked apart and refit to standard Hollywood tropes, is still a better film than most of the dreck out there.

2. Comparing the two cuts is the best education anyone will ever have regarding how useless the Hollywood studios are.

Posted by: Captain Splendid at May 13, 2009 3:59 PM

Boo: shucks, you made me blush.

George: I quoted Metal Gear Solid 2?

Posted by: Steven Lloyd Wilson at May 13, 2009 4:04 PM

Well, you know, people here don't believe in happiness, Mr. Splendid.

Posted by: Jay at May 13, 2009 4:07 PM


I quoted Metal Gear Solid 2?

The Eliot, it seems.

Posted by: Jay at May 13, 2009 4:09 PM

dudes...Jonathan Pryce was in the Infinity commercials in the 90s.

i'll never forget his soothing, aristocratic voice telling me all about the Q series. it changed me.

Posted by: arr matey at May 13, 2009 4:28 PM

I agree with all the wonderful thing said about this film. I've seen it several times including once in a film class. But here is the thing: it never stays with me. I don't know why. Anyone else have this experience with Brazil?

Posted by: ed newman at May 13, 2009 4:30 PM

Yes stripe, although I'm sure it's been said before, during the end of the game, when you talk with Colonel Campbell over the Codec, he says, "This is how society dies, not with a bang but with a wimper."

I'm sure others said it before that, but MGS2 is always what I think of whenever I hear that quote.

Posted by: George at May 13, 2009 4:45 PM

the psychotic bitch mother feeding off of its children

I didn't realise Dina Lohan was acting that long ago!

SLW, your reviews are consistently sublime. Well done!

Posted by: lordhelmet at May 13, 2009 4:47 PM

The ending stands as one of the greatest endings in the history of ever. It turns on you and totally shocks you. Well, it shocked me at least.

Posted by: Kamikaze Feminist at May 13, 2009 4:56 PM

Nice review. Thanks!

This film is one of my favorites. When I moved out to Hollywood, I actually made a point of making this the first movie I saw in a theater on the big screen, as I was lucky enough to catch a revival of it.

Posted by: DarthCorleone at May 13, 2009 5:02 PM

This is a classic example of what the Hollywood machine can do to lobotomize a good film if you let them get away with it. The "Love Conquers All" version that was edited down for television was a hack job. Thankfully, Gilliam fought tooth and nail to keep his original vision in the theatrical release. His version is one of the all time best films.

Posted by: Leftylad at May 13, 2009 5:22 PM

I love this movie (and I love Steven Lloyd Wilson, and will fight boo to the death I SAID TO THE DEATH), but is it really a blockbuster? I feel like I remember it coming out to a lot of critical acclaim, but not much in the way of box office. (Of course, I was 14 at the time, so who the hell knows what I was paying attention to. It didn't have any cute boys. But I watched it on the big(gish) screen in a film class, ad I thought I recalled a discussion about not getting it shown anywhere because he wanted it kept to his version and he wound up showing it on a lot of college campuses and it barely broke even. Just me?)

P.S. I might think about paying money to see a roundtable discussion between Ranylt and Steven. I'm just saying.

Posted by: Anna von Beaverplatz at May 13, 2009 6:14 PM

AvB: according to Boxofficemojo it made $9,929,135 domestic. So no, it was not a blockbuster by any stretch of the imagination.

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at May 13, 2009 6:44 PM

If only every other Gilliam film (besides 12 Monkeys) wasn't so f***ing terrible.

Posted by: ChristianH at May 13, 2009 8:59 PM

ed newman the same thing happens to me. Someone will ask me about this movie and I'll be like "um...what movie is that again?" And then they force me to watch it and I'm like "ohhhhhh. Right!"

But then I have some hereditary short term memory loss action going on...

Posted by: Blonde Savant at May 13, 2009 9:14 PM

If only every other Gilliam film (besides 12 Monkeys) wasn't so f***ing terrible.

Posted by: ChristianH at May 13, 2009 8:59 PM

-------------------------------------------------

You seen Time Bandits? Or Adventures of Baron Munchausen?

If you haven't, maybe you should check'em out.

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at May 13, 2009 9:31 PM

"This is your receipt for your husband... and this is my receipt for your receipt."

I remember seeing this movie when I was a teenager and just being absolutely blown away. My fiance and I just finished watching the whole Monty Python's Flying Circus series, and now we're working out way through the specials and eventually we'll watch all their movies again. I think I'll add this one to the queue.

Posted by: Melissa at May 13, 2009 10:01 PM

So maybe the term "terrorist" is outdated and over the top, but let us not delude ourselves that there aren't any groups who want to kill all Americans. I would consider that terrorism. Willing blindness is still blindness, and if Medvedev gives Chavez the nukes, you won't be so blithe about the danger our country is in, sir.

Posted by: mae at May 13, 2009 10:25 PM

Never seen the movie, but I love dystopian visions, so I'll have to check it out.

On a weird side note, I actually taught "The Hollow Men" to my eleventh grade classes today. (For those of you who think the review title is from some video game, that's the Eliot poem which he's quoting.) At first they were like, "A three page poem?!" but then I found a fabulous YouTube video of some creepy-voiced British guy reading it aloud, and they were really into it. I swear, the internet saves my ass so many times....

Posted by: Ariel at May 13, 2009 10:38 PM

A truly weird and wonderful film.

Posted by: , (the commenter formerly known as bucdaddy) at May 13, 2009 11:18 PM

I'm sure others said it before that, but MGS2 is always what I think of whenever I hear that quote.

I still have the sneaking suspicion that this movie was playing in the background when Kojima was writing that game. The ending in particular.

Posted by: Vermillion at May 13, 2009 11:18 PM

"My complications have developed comlications.."
I think the best mind fuck about this movie is that folks went to it thinking it was a "Python" movie and then got skewered so beautifully. And it was all so cool that we got it. And loved it.Brilliant movie. Brilliant review.

Posted by: Odnon at May 14, 2009 12:18 AM

Lovely review. I have to say for anyone who hasn't seen it yet (you whippersnappers), or is slightly 'meh' about it - it's my belief that Gilliam's work is the kind of rich stuff that you should check in with every decade or so. Brazil has by turns freaked me out, repelled me, bored me, inspired me and I'm left with a real sense of awe over how complex/simple a great film can get. The older I get, the better it gets.

No matter what you think of his films, there's always a lot of food on the plate.

Posted by: replica at May 14, 2009 12:47 AM

Brazil scares the shit out of me. If you ever get a chance read the book Stalin in Power, it shows how Stalin and his government were able to kill 30 million people through bureaucracy. It is a truly horrifying book, Brazil reminds me of that. The randomness, the error, the banality of it all. Although Brazil has it's funny social commentary, I couldn't sleep after watching it.

Posted by: Mebe at May 14, 2009 3:54 AM

I love this movie ... but is it really a blockbuster?
It's a pajiba-blockbuster, the opposite of an underappreciated gem. Lots of people here have seen it.
I found the dystopian future too horrible to really enjoy the film. I ought to watch it again. Of course the 'murder' of Buttle is worse because it wasn't murder but an accident. They were torturing Buttle but had the medical records of Tuttle which didn't mention Buttle's weak heart.

Posted by: ChrisD at May 14, 2009 6:35 AM

I'm sorry, but I thought this movie was dreck. It's long, boring and the concepts explored are really fairly shallow for sci-fi metaphors. I watched it for a class and it was the one thing we watched or read for that class that I didn't have anything to say about. There's no there there.

Posted by: misselise at May 14, 2009 8:52 AM

I've seen all three cuts of the film, and I suggest that everyone do the same merely because not only is it a fun movie, but it's interesting to see each version's interpretation of events. I'll never forget the first time I saw this movie in college, and how it blew my mind. (I hung out with a huge film buff who finally goaded me into renting the DVD.)

The Criterion set is AMAZING, and it's fun to compare the two versions of the film in it. (They left out the "Compromise" cut, which is actually the Universal single disc release.)

Steven, amazing review as usual. This just makes me want to watch it again.

Posted by: Doctor Controversy at May 14, 2009 9:32 AM

Best review on any movie by anyone in a very long time.

Posted by: GM at May 16, 2009 7:35 PM

So maybe the term "terrorist" is outdated and over the top, but let us not delude ourselves that there aren't any groups who want to kill all Americans. I would consider that terrorism. Willing blindness is still blindness, and if Medvedev gives Chavez the nukes, you won't be so blithe about the danger our country is in, sir.

Wha-wha-wha-what?!?

It's rich of an American to be all butt hurt and conspiratorial about Chavez's intentions after the attempts the US has made to overthrow the man for sticking it to American corporations and nationalizing a few industries.

That said, the guy doesn't want to nuke anyone, I think he just wants a blow job and a little respect.

Posted by: Alon at May 16, 2009 7:51 PM

Brazil, in my mind, is an amazing cinematic
triumph.
It's certainly one of those stylized films that
the viewer either loves of abhors (with ravenous
intensity.)
I still have friends and relatives that, when offering movie viewing ideas to, I need to have a firm grasp of their sense of humor and interpretation of what they consider to be art, before I will even consider introducing them to this picture.
As an above poster(Mebe) has stated, this movie can be scary.
I remember my mom taking me to the theater during its first run (mom was the coolest - from the age of 10 on - it was a steady stream of AA and Restricted shows) and I walked out of that place
feeling somewhat discombobulated.
At the age 15 in 1985 I still must have been used to the :-morality prevails\happy ending- good guys always win scenario, as where I left this picture completely mindfucked (What? Now the hero
will live out his days - lobotomized?)
As myself and the rest of the current population had just went through the year 1984 (and its revival of Orwellian concerns) the film's setting
in a society that is [Big Brother - To the Max!!!]
was well within the realms of public consciousness.
I can only think now of how what was then fictional fantasy upon a movie screen has slowly but surely crept its way into the society and its governance that we live amongst today.

Brazil is one of the few movies that I've seen over twenty times that I know I can watch again and not go through periods of disinterest during
any part of the film.
I can't say that about many others.

Since it was previously brought up, if you like this movie and you haven't seen them yet, check out Time Bandits (If I'm any indication- boys and teenagers will like it- and it was bankrolled by George Harrison and members of Led Zeppelin and Pink Floyd) one of my favorite 'short person' less than tall ensembles outside of The Wizard Of Oz and Under The Rainbow(Chevy Chase-Carrie Fisher) - [as a teenager and raving Star Wars fan
I was waking up in the morning with uncontrollable sheet tearing wood for about 2 weeks after watching Fisher parade around in garters and underwear.]

As I finish this post, I can't help but bring up
my other favorite Terry Gilliam film:
Fear And Loathing In Las Vegas.
So many people like to write this off as a stoner flick, and although it's a great stoned (and or -
drunken)watch, it's so much more than that.

If not at the behest of a friend i probably wouldn't have bothered to go see this movie.
I went though - left a party in progress (fairly inebriated) and hoofed it to the downtown repertory theater - and was subjected to quite the trip.
I wasn't in the ideal condition at that time to fully absorb everything that was going on during that first viewing, but, the following 25+ playbacks have filled in quite a few holes, which have, in turn, solidified this picture within my all-time top 20 movie list.

Posted by: Weirdly Sawbones at May 21, 2009 1:00 AM

Oh! - By the way (in case ya' didn't know.)

When questioned as to what his all time favorite
movie was in an interview that was conducted about a year before his death, Frank Zappa claimed Brazil to be his favorite.

Yes - this was just useless trivia, but, being a huge Zappa fan and Brazil devotee, when I read that I was positively glowing.

Then again - now that I think of it - I do live downstream (water table - wise) from Love Canal.

Posted by: Weirdly Sawbones at May 21, 2009 1:22 AM