
Judi to Cate: Lez be Best Friends
Notes on a Scandal / Rob Watson
Notes on a Scandal opens as such a devastating study of a familiar archetype that you spend the rest of the movie waiting for the mechanics of the plot to betray it. Judi Dench, as a dour history teacher at a failing London school, narrates the events leading up to her initial meeting with the woman who will become her obsession, and as we listen to her bilious words, it’s like peeking into the diary of every miserable spinster who ruined your pre-adolescence.
Dench’s Barbara has long given up on the ideals of teaching, which, after 30 years, she likens to crowd control. At a staff meeting, she’s content to report on her students’ progress as “below the national average but well above catastrophic.” She shows no evidence of connection to her students, despises her co-workers, and goes home at night to her sad basement apartment, accompanied only by her diary and her cat.
She’s even initially skeptical of Sheba Hart (Cate Blanchett), the “willowy novice” who descends upon the school’s art department and blindsides Barbara by asking her to coffee and then to Sunday lunch. Intimidated at first by Sheba’s beauty, Barbara is stunned by the younger woman’s frank admission of her own vulnerabilities and “selflessly” adopts the role of mentor. Soon, however, Barbara discovers Sheba’s secret — an affair with a 15-year-old student (Andrew Simpson) — and uses the knowledge for emotional blackmail. With only Barbara to confide in, Sheba must do what the older woman says.
Because we’re so accustomed to stories of unrequited erotic obsession ending with, say, Rebecca de Mornay impaled on a picket fence, it’s a pleasant surprise that Notes on a Scandal — despite a plot hoary enough to hinge on the discovery of an illicit diary — uses this setup to explore the disastrous effects of a woman’s everyday loneliness. Barbara, who could well be a virgin, vocally abhors the “teach through nurture” post-self-esteem-era academic environment that traps her. But given the obvious pain of her repressed homosexuality, it’s easy to see how she resents the freedoms of the younger generations. She scorns Sheba’s “bourgeois bohemia,” yet she’s mortally jealous of Sheba’s exterior appearance of having it all. Sheba, meanwhile, feels tremendously insecure in the roles of wife/mother/educator and pines for her Siouxsie and the Banshees-worshipping, aspiring-artist youth. She’s also, crucially, a bloody fool, albeit one played deftly by Blanchett as dim and self-absorbed in a plausible way. You believe she’d be too preoccupied to pick up on Barbara’s manipulation.
Dench rips into screenwriter Patrick Marber’s more lacerating dialogue (he’s adapted Zoe Heller’s novel What Was She Thinking? Notes on a Scandal) with gusto. (Marber also wrote Closer, and yes, we get lots of knife-edged rhetoric and obligatory use of the C-word). But the more Barbara tries to control Sheba’s feelings, the less she actually succeeds, and Dench is never better than when she’s portraying Barbara losing her grip on her own emotions — not as a psychotic harridan but as a profoundly solitary person. The performance works in fascinating contrast to Dench’s turn last year in Ladies in Lavender, in which she played a far gentler lonely spinster in love with a boy who washes up on the beach near her cottage. In both films, the impact of unrequited love on a woman who will never know what it’s like to be loved back cuts to the bone.
Director Richard Eyre, who was hamstrung by the deadweight miscasting of Billy Crudup and Claire Danes in his last effort, Stage Beauty, seems energized by his two formidable leads. He’s made the year’s shortest (90 minutes), leanest Oscar-bait showcase, and if the Philip Glass score occasionally threatens to Philip Glass™ the movie to death, it also gets under your skin.
Bill Nighy, as Sheba’s much-older husband (they met when she was his student), again proves a master of doing a lot with a little, and Simpson, as the jailbait, has a genuine junior-lothario vibe made all the more unsettling by the fact that he barely looks even 15 (whew … IMDb says he’s 17).
If, in the end, Notes on a Scandal feels most notable for successfully avoiding its Lesbian Fatal Attraction pitfall potential, it still deserves praise for what it achieves: An impassioned exploration of the type of woman few people — let alone filmmakers — stop to think about.
Guest critic Rob Watson shares his gimlet-eyed observations about the horrors of celebrity culture at The PEN15 Club. You may email him here.
Letters from Iwo Jima | | Pajiba Love 01/18/07
Comments
The "C-Word"?
Yeah. There were a lot of bloody cunts in this movie.
Posted by: Seth W at December 24, 2006 8:55 PM
A proper American version of this would've had Sharon Stone as the spinster, Kristen Cavallary as the ingenue and K-Fed aka "Earl" as the young lothario. Lots of sapphic hilarity would have ensued.
Posted by: BarbadoSlim at December 25, 2006 11:56 AM
Awesome review, Rob. I'm glad to see the Pen15 branching out, and hope you'll be doing some more reviews for Pajiba.
Posted by: Craig at December 25, 2006 1:27 PM
so the old witch is enjoying the tender flesh of a younger , hot teacher , . it works on a few levels .dvd time for sure
Posted by: pasadenamike at December 25, 2006 3:59 PM
I saw a preview of this the other day and it was cut to make the movie look so edgy and melodramatic that I expected it to fall prey to every cliché in the Psychotic Gay Stalker Movie lexicon. It's good to know it doesn't do that. Now I actually want to check it out as opposed to after the preview where I was cringing and wondering how two fantastic actresses got involved in something that looked so shitty and overdone.
Posted by: chriso at December 25, 2006 5:06 PM
"...despises her co-workers, and goes home at night to her sad basement apartment, accompanied only by her diary and her cat."
Christ, that almost sounds like me!
Ladies in Lavender was a lovely movie and I'm looking forward to seeing this one, being that I should be able to identify with one of the main characters. (Joking, sorta.)
Posted by: Mary at December 25, 2006 7:06 PM
I CANNOT WAIT TO SEE THIS!!!!!!!
i love dame dench and i love cate.
i do, however, hate the purile title of this review. lez be friends...really. how 11th grade...but I CANNOT WAIT TO SEE THIS!
sorry.
carry on.
Posted by: WTF at December 26, 2006 6:23 PM
chriso, I thought the same thing about the preview. This review now makes me want to see the film after all.
Posted by: Lily at December 27, 2006 9:33 PM
Man, I loved this book. When I saw it was being made into a movie I was a little worried. Then I saw it had Freaking Bill Nighy in it- Bill Nighy people. I've been his bitch ever since Shawn of the Dead. Then you have Judi Dench and Cate Freakin Blanchett? This movie owns me.
This review just made me more excited about a movie I was already excited to see.
Posted by: cmoody at December 28, 2006 10:53 PM
I saw this movie yesterday, and "Oscar bait" is right! Yes, the betrayal-by-a-supposed-friend plot is familiar (heck, it's in the Spiderman movies), but these characters are real people, not stereotypical victims and schemers.
Interestingly, the lesbian aspect isn't portrayed as evil or perverted per se, which was refreshing. The real motif of the story is the extent to which a relationship between two people of very different ages and positions of power (e.g., teacher and student) can ever be free from exploitation.
By the way, I've always thought of Cate Blanchett as being more striking than beautiful, but she's absolutely gorgeous in this film.
Posted by: Dorianne Gray at December 29, 2006 5:54 PM
Why can't all movies star Cate and Judy? Anything else seems a waste of effort.
On a shallow note, has anyone noticed how thin Cate is getting lately? You can't see it so much in this film, because she wears long, droopy clothes, but find a recent picture in revealing evening wear. She was always slim, but she has lost 20+ pounds compared to a year or two ago. I don't know how she stands up.
God preserve her from looking like Mary-Kate and Ashley's older sister.
Posted by: Janis at January 10, 2007 3:10 AM
I saw the movie and felt that it led toward an conclusion that never happened. Yes, the acting was superb, the plot line was interesting, the photography was engaging, but what the hell happened to the naked lesbian love scenes?
Posted by: P. Zack Hilliard at February 6, 2007 7:39 PM
Only one line about Philip Glass? The score killed me. My mother, who has never heard of PG, leaned over and said "What is with the music?" halfway through. I've enjoyed his other works at times, but this one absoutely killed the movie and managed to overshadow some dame fine acting.
Posted by: portlandtables at March 2, 2007 5:44 PM
Five months later, I've finally seen it, and I loved it enough to search for the review and comment that I loved it.
It was beyond reproach. Casting, dialogue, direction.
An impassioned exploration of the type of woman few people -- let alone filmmakers -- stop to think about.
Indeed.
Posted by: juliagulia at July 13, 2007 2:13 PM

