wonderwoman.jpg
No One Can Resist the Golden Lasso. It Compels Them to Tell ... the Pajiba!

The Weekly Trade Round-Up / The Pajiba Staff

Item #1: With Sundance in full swing, there’s not a lot of industry excitement otherwise, but there is a film that’s been in development for years now, which we amazingly haven’t touched upon in our trade round-ups: Wonder Woman. Despite its feminist underpinnings, there’s all sorts of reasons to be skeptical: Cheesy weaponry (The Lasso of Truth, those indestructible bracelets, and (gasp!) that goddamn invisible jet), as well as all the ridiculous casting speculation; among others, Sophia Bush, Evangeline Lilly, Jessica Biel, Kim Basinger, Katherine McPhee, Rachel Bilson, Kate Beckinsale, and Jill Wagner have, at various times, been attached as the super heroine. Still, there is one reason to be optimistic: Joss Whedon, who will write the screenplay and direct. Unlike a couple of my colleagues, I couldn’t buy into “Buffy” love and I’ve never been one for fanboyitis, but — my God — I dug “Firefly”/Serenity. So, I get the feeling that no matter whom Whedon puts into the star-spangled panties, it won’t matter — it should be a dandy of a great film, if Whedon’s track record is any indication. And, for those who are interested, you can keep up with all the absurd casting news here. — Dustin Rowles

Item #2: Sure, he made his bones on Bloody Sunday and The Bourne Supremacy, but it was the stomach-gnawing tension of United 93 that turned director Paul Greengrass into a household name. Fresh off an Oscar nom for best direction for the docudrama, it was announced this week that Greengrass’ next project will be a film set in the aftermath of the Iraq invasion (presumably the 2003 one, but who knows). Greengrass will write and direct the film, which will be based on Rajiv Chandrasekaran’s book Imperial Life in the Emerald City: Inside Iraq’s Green Zone, chronicling the author’s tenure as Baghdad bureau chief for the Washington Post. For those who missed his recent appearance on “The Daily Show,” I’ll save you the suspense: The book leans more toward the “Oh God, oh God, we’re all gonna die” version of modern Iraqi life, as opposed to the White House version, which merely defines the situation as “interesting” and “worth watching.” Regardless, it’s become clear that Greengrass has found his niche. I wouldn’t be surprised if The Bourne Ultimatum is tweaked in postproduction to become a haunting elegy about a suicide bomber, albeit one who knows some wicked karate. — Daniel Carlson

Item #3: Well, I don’t even know what to think of this bit of casting news: Al Pacino has been attached as Salvador Dali in Dali and I, based on the memoir of the same name. Sure, Pacino used to be an exceptional actor and still is, intermittently, but I’m not sure how excited I can get about Pacino loudly proclaiming, “Here’s your Persistence of Memory, hoo-wah!” for two hours, especially when actual Spanish actors might have been better suited to the role (Javier Bardem, for instance). Andrew Niccol, who directed Pacino in Sim0ne and is responsible for The Truman Show script and the excellent Gattaca, is attached to direct. — DR

Item #4: I don’t have any children. And I’m not saying that like I’m looking for offers to partner up and pollute the planet or anything. I like my apartment the way it is, dirty and probably a dangerous place for an infant to live. (The patio opens onto the pool, which is just a “‘Dateline’-Exclusive” tragedy waiting to happen.) But I’m also glad I don’t have kids because I don’t have to explain to them that, although movies can be wonderful things, all of the ones targeted at children are wretched. The latest evidence: It was announced this week that director Tim Hill, probably best known for helming the cinematic abortion that is Garfield: A Tale of Two Kitties, is in talks with 20th Century Fox’s Fox 2000 division to head up a new film version of Alvin and the Chipmunks. It’s likely that a human would be cast in the role of Dave, the chipmunks’ probably-gay warden who forces them to wear those weird shirts and sing in harmony, while the anthropomorphic rodents themselves would be animated with help of an evil computer. I don’t even know what to say. If you have children, give them a book or something. Do whatever it takes. Just keep them away from this movie. — DC

Item #5: HBO’s got two new shows on the horizon, and they’ve flipped the standard format a little, as one is an hour-long comedy while the other’s a half-hour drama. The comedy is “12 Miles of Bad Road,” starring Lily Tomlin as the matriarch of a rich Texas family. It should be fun to see if Tomlin’s still got her comedy chops (her stint on “The West Wing” showed she could still pull off the dry stuff). It also stares Kim Dickens (from “Deadwood”) and Gary Cole (“I’m gonna need you to go ahead and come in tomorrow. … Uh, I’m also gonna need you to go ahead and come in on Sunday too, ‘kay?”). But more interesting is the half-hour drama “In Treatment,” which stars Gabriel Byrne as a therapist with some emotional problems of his own (sounds a touch like the Ted Danson stinker “Help Me, Help You,” no?). Based on an Israeli series of the same name, it will also star Dianne Wiest, Blair Underwood, Embeth Davidtz (I dunno who she is either) and Melissa George. What’s really interesting about this show is how high HBO is on it — instead of the typical (for HBO) 13-episode order, HBO has 45 episodes on order. Forty-five! Now, word has it that the original show’s format, which this will presumably follow, is basically a half-hour talker, with each episode being one day in the therapist’s life — most episodes focus on him talking to a patient, while some have him talking to his therapist. I don’t know about you, but that doesn’t sound worthy of 45 episodes right out the gate, but I guess time will tell. Here’s hoping it’s less like “Arli$$” and “Lucky Louie” and more like “Entourage” (Marky Mark is a showrunner, so that’s a step in the “Entourage” direction I suppose). — Seth Freilich

Item #6: In box-office news, Stomp the Yard clung to the top spot in a lackluster weekend for returns, beating the competition with only $13 million. But can someone in the know please explain why Explosions in the Sky has not (to my knowledge) been given credit for the impeccable score? They are nowhere to be found on the Stomp IMDb page, but the similarities are, well, plagiaristic. Otherwise, Night at the Museum continues to inexplicably generate heavy grosses — it’s now made $205 million. Ben Stiller will never fade away; Museum has given him permission to make another decade of shitty, self-abusive films. Ahoy! Dreamgirls expanded and rose to number three with nearly $9 million, but I still can’t help thinking that folks just aren’t as wowed with it as everyone expected them to be in September. Finally, The Hitcher debuted weakly at number four with $8.2 million. C. Thomas Howell just turned over in his grave. (What? He’s not dead? Could’ve fooled me; the guy looks like Bernie Lomax in Weekend at Bernie’s IX.)

This weekend, we present some real January detritus, starting with Epic Movie, which doesn’t even warrant a starring role for Anna Faris (though, Crispin Hellion Glover inexplicably does appear). Somebody needs to give the remaining writers of the Scary Movie franchise a Dwight Freeney beatdown. We also bring you Blood and Chocolate, which has absolutely nothing to do with one of Elvis Costello’s best efforts. It has something to do with werewolves and Evanescence, I think. But hey! It’s based on the bestselling novel, so — you know — it’s literary! Next up, Jennifer Garner and Kevin Smith do Catch and Release. Kevin … why do you wound me so? On the bright side, though, it at least gives Juliette Lewis a job. Finally, the real excitement this weekend is for Smokin’ Aces, which just looks like all sorts of gratuitously violent, senseless bad-movie awesomeness; it may just be this year’s Very Bad Things. — DR


Pajiba Love 01/04/07 | | The Biggest Hype-Busting Films of 2006 |



Comments

I think Embeth Davidtz is one of those "you'd know her if you saw her" types.

http://imdb.com/name/nm0001110/

Posted by: Sarah at January 25, 2007 7:11 AM

Embeth Davis...hot.

Army of Darkness...gimme some sugar baby!

Posted by: PissBoy at January 25, 2007 8:43 AM

Davidtz...wow...i retype phonetically

Posted by: PissBoy at January 25, 2007 8:46 AM

I love Joss Whedon as much as the next crazy Firefly fan, but Wonder Woman? Seriously? I know the man likes his comic books, but there was nothing else out there that could have been adapted? I don't know if I'm ready for a red-and-gold bathing suit and a stupid lasso.

Posted by: TK at January 25, 2007 9:14 AM

$205 million for Night at the Museum? Please tell me that that's a typo or that tickets to it cost $1000 per person. Maybe it's $25 million? or hopefully $2.5 million?

What I want to know is what is Jason Bateman's role in Smokin Aces? (I should probably just wait for the review) I hope it's better than Will Arnet's (spelling?) follow up--Let's go to Prison or some nonsense.

Posted by: anikitty at January 25, 2007 9:36 AM

This week's movie choices looks pretty grim. I think my unfortunate fate will be watching Blood and Chocolate and wondering why they didn't pay me to see it. But see it I will, for I was one of those tortured teenagers, once upon a time, that held the book in such high regard.

And because Hugh Dancy's very pretty.

Posted by: Ann at January 25, 2007 10:45 AM

Alvin and the Chipmunks is still one of my favorites. It isn't Christmas till I hear, "I still want a hula-hoop." Hollywood has ruined so many of my childhood memories already. Fuck up Alvin, and we're gonna throw down!

Posted by: dammitjanet at January 25, 2007 10:53 AM

I'll preface my comment with the fact that I am, by no means, a supurb judge of acting talent or even what defines a good movie, however, Al Pacino? Dali? Really? Wha? Ugh.

Posted by: Lizzy at January 25, 2007 11:16 AM

"...a Dwight Freeney beatdown."

Hee hee! That just made my day.

GO COLTS!

Posted by: malikvlc at January 25, 2007 11:40 AM

Good to see I wasn't the only one hoping it was something like an Elvis Costello concert film.

Posted by: Brian at January 25, 2007 11:45 AM

Embeth Davitz- That was a weird enough name for me to remember from "Army of Darkness". She was also in that weird robot movie with Robin Williams. What the hell was that called? Bicentennial Man?

Posted by: Cathy at January 25, 2007 12:02 PM

While i do love me some classic Pacino. I cannot say the same for contemporary super-ham Al.

And I weep for a cinematic future filled with Stiller atrocities.

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at January 25, 2007 12:53 PM

Embeth Davidtz was in Junebug and I loved her in that. But how in the hell did I not notice she's the chick from Army of Darkness?? I am totally dumbstruck. Sheez, I've seen that move like 35 times!

Posted by: AM at January 25, 2007 1:08 PM

I'm so surprised that a Pajiba writer didn't know Embeth Davidtz. Apparently, all your readers know!

You have given me hope for Wonderwoman. I loved the campy show when I was, like, 7 years old. I really hope the actress they choose is great.

Posted by: Bitch Please at January 25, 2007 1:19 PM

"the cinematic abortion that is Garfield: A Tale of Two Kitties"

Dan, if you ever do change your mind and want to produce spawn, let me know.

Posted by: missindie at January 25, 2007 1:44 PM

E.D was also in Danny Devito's version of the Roald Dahl book Matilda. If memory serves, I think she was also in 'Schindler's List', playing an engineer or something--I haven't seen that film in a long time.

Posted by: M at January 25, 2007 2:36 PM

Yeah, I know. Blood and Chocolate was way too hot of a book to be adapted faithfully (Did someone say "statutory?" No? Oh.) so I already know it's gonna blow. Let us pray the same thing isn't done to Twilight by Miss Meyer.

Posted by: thatbeeschick at January 25, 2007 3:20 PM

I am boggled at how retarded HBO seems to be - ordering more episodes for that clunker sounding Gabriel Byrne vehicle than they allowed Deadwood?

And not much of a Buffy or Wonderwoman fan, but I'll watch any movie Whedon makes ... maybe even in der Theater.

Posted by: meh! at January 25, 2007 3:41 PM

Hmmmm, I enjoy Whedon's work as well, buuuut, any project that's had Katherine FUCKING McPhee in any way associated with it CAN'T possibly be any good or serious work of film.

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at January 25, 2007 4:04 PM

Wasn't Embeth Davidtz also in Schindler's List also? (It was around the same time as AoD.)

Posted by: Anonoguy at January 25, 2007 4:52 PM

Lily Tomlin definitely still has her comedy chops - I Heart Huckabees, anyone? She's awesome.

Posted by: Melissa at January 25, 2007 6:03 PM

Kick me in the head, but that Epic Movie looks pretty darn funny. Not that I'd go see it, I don't get to go to the movies all that often, seeing as how I have a 3 year old. But I think I might have to rent it.

Posted by: sonya at January 25, 2007 6:50 PM

I still can't help thinking that folks just aren't as wowed with it as everyone expected them to be in September.

I'm with you, Dustin. I enjoyed Dreamgirls as it was, but I do think it's overrated, as was Jennifer Hudson's performance. I'm confused as to why she won a GG for it, and I really hope that she doesn't win the Oscar. She's not bad at all, but I wasn't impressed.

And on a totally random note, I too think that Hugh Dancy is very pretty, albeit on the short side....

And I'm not ashamed to admit that I was introduced to Embeth as Miss Honey on Matilda. Shut up. It was sweet, and I was young.

Posted by: Daphne at January 25, 2007 6:59 PM

I could totally see Sophia Bush as WW. Blue contacts are needed and maybe a push up bra but I think she'd fit the role well. I hope she gets it.

Posted by: Candy at January 25, 2007 7:02 PM

As someone who's been obsessively seeking out every bit of WW movie info, I can give you something else to be optimistic about: Joss Whedon has declared no star-spangled panties.
Whether this means he'll be going back to the original costume's skirt (which was also pretty silly in all honesty) or what, I don't know. But it gives me a warm feeling inside.

Posted by: etango at January 25, 2007 7:57 PM

Alvin and the Chipmunks? My God, is nothing sacred? I can see it now, some shitty pop soundtrack and bad voiceovers.

Posted by: Brie at January 25, 2007 11:30 PM

In regards to HBO shows, is there much truth to the Alan Ball directed vampire series based on Charlaine Harris' books? I'd watch anything directed by Alan Ball after Six Feet Under. I think the books are all Dead Until...whatever, but the series may be called True Blood.

Posted by: jp at January 26, 2007 11:07 AM

Knowing about the Greengrass/Chandrasekaran film made my day! I cannot wait! May shame come down on this White House like the most acidic rain!

Posted by: mfg at January 27, 2007 5:48 PM

No Catch and Release review? I was looking forward to it...

Posted by: ra at January 27, 2007 6:53 PM

If anyone can make a decent film about Iraq today (as opposed to with easy hindsight, ten years from now), it's Greengrass.

I assume most people won't see it, the way most people didn't see United 93, and for the same reason: it will be too real.

War? More frightening than a horror film? Who knew?

Posted by: Janis at January 27, 2007 10:47 PM

Hey, is it just me, or did we accidentally stumble upon the most super amazing casting idea ever: Embeth Davidtz should star in the new Wonder Woman movie. Where's Joss Whedon's phone number, this is gold I tell ya, GOLD!

Posted by: CarpePancakes! at January 27, 2007 11:49 PM

Just fyi:

Joss Whedon is no longer on the Wonder Woman project:
http://whedonesque.com/comments/12385

Posted by: Edith at February 5, 2007 1:04 PM