web
counter
 

Rise Up, With or Without Fists

By Christian H. | Posted Under Music | Comments (19)



phonix-band.jpg

PhoenixWolfgang.jpgPhoenix: Wolfgang Amadeus Phoenix
[V2 Records, Loyauté]

Phoenix is your typical poppy, skinny white indie-rock outfit. Hooky choruses and simple guitar riffs, singing that, in terms of tone, resembles blithely yelling down the street, and tight backbeats. Typical. Well, except that they’re French. Oh, and they are possibly the best synergy of the best elements of the indie rock scene today. They are The Shins without the underlying sorrow and the slower acoustic tracks. They are The Strokes without the guitar solos, distorted vocals, and dickish attitudes. They are Franz Ferdinand without the sexuality. Yet they are not blandly reasserting a genre’s validity; Phoenix have a unique sound to work with, an almost shy audaciousness. And they may just be the band that bubbles the scene to the surface from the depths of underground pretention.

On Wolfgang Amadeus Phoenix, the fourth album from this much-buzzed-about young band, we don’t hear new ground broken. There is nothing done on this album that hasn’t been done before. But it’s not the breaking of conventions that makes Phoenix noteworthy; rather it’s the finesse of those conventions implemented in a way that is accessible, entertaining, and yet still unconsciously impressive. And it is this point that makes Phoenix uniquely suited to straddle the indie scene and the mainstream charts: While they are unabashedly pop-heavy, their synthesized rock sound captivates the ear with honesty. They don’t lie to the listener to be likable.

The sounds on the album are not diverse, but it’s hard to complain when the songs in question are so beautifully polished. There is the aforementioned pop-rock groove, layered with synthesizers and Thomas Mars’ sweet, wonderfully doubled-up vocals. This is best represented by the album’s lead singles, and two lead-off tracks, “Lisztomania” and “1901”. There is a burst of disco, mostly on “Fences”. And the back half of the album jogs like a Police record for the new millennium (except, you know, better than a new Police record would be. Right?). But all through, the band has no problem settling into their comfort zone and chilling dynamically. On the wonderfully slow-building two-part “Love Like A Sunset”, there is a passionate edge that keeps you waiting vainly for release, particularly in the instrumental first half. And, despite their upbeat enthusiasm, their music retains depth. There is vibrant energy for those who just want to groove, but there’s vital processes running underneath for those who want to pay close attention.

All of this isn’t to say that Phoenix has made the perfect record. Indeed, for all its pop charms, it can easily slip into the background and be forgotten past the mid-point (which is good or bad depending on what you want). These tracks aren’t bad by any stretch (and if you can focus on them long enough, they’re wonderfully enjoyable), but they aren’t entirely engaging. It’s the sort of music that causes people to zone out at the wheel and daydream instead of drive. It could be due to production; the album is, at different points, polished and hazy. This has a lot to do with the vocals; while lovable and fitting, the doubling effect, particularly with such a sleepy tone as Mars’, can cross over into the realm of a strange lullaby that puts the listener right out.

Right now, Wolfgang Amadeus Phoenix could act as a litmus test for the industry, to see their true acceptance or non-acceptance for the independent music scene. If, as I hope, the mainstream embraces the catchiness and shine of Phoenix’s pop song structures, it could mean a transformation of the genre, as like-minded bands get pulled into the spotlight. It’s unlikely, it’s probably a false hope. But right now, hope is all we can do.

Christian Hagen is a music journalist from Minneapolis (who is also in a band), who likes to waste his time writing about nothing, and who has yet to launch his own website (though one is on its way), so for now he can only link to his MySpace profile.









Life As We Know It Katherine Heigl | Gene Dante & The Future Starlets Review













Comments

I listened to their interview and set with Mary Lucia on the Current yesterday, and they came across as pretty likable.

I have to admit a certain fondness for "1901" as well, it's a good song.

Posted by: Snath at June 24, 2009 11:44 AM

"it’s hard to complain when the songs in question are so beautifully polished"

That sounds like way too polished. Why does this site like bands who whine so much? What indie crap. What's wrong with proper singing and loud guitar solos?

Posted by: barf at June 24, 2009 11:50 AM

Nice review of what works with Phoenix. The Holy Ghost remix of "Lisztomania" is the bees knees!

Posted by: Teresa at June 24, 2009 11:53 AM

Excuse me for a moment.

Barf, you're not paying enough attention. We've written about Kings of Leon, The Black Keys, Radio Moscow, Lamb of God, Metallica, Living Colour, Johnny Cash, The Reverend Horton Heat, Mando Diao, and Pavement, just to name a few. Check the archives.

We now return to your comment section, already in progress.

Posted by: TK at June 24, 2009 11:59 AM

I don't know why any indie band would want to get pulled into the spotlight or why you would hope for that. As soon as these progressively cool bands cowtow to the corporate lables the music all of a sudden becomes a shell of its former self.

Personally, I think it is somewhat insulting to put these guys in the same league as the Strokes, the Shins or franz ferdinand. And your review comes across as more "take it or leave it" than it does "it is mandatory that you listen to this shit NOW!". Like Snath, I would say that these guys are likeable but hardly transcendent.

Posted by: John Denver's Wingman at June 24, 2009 12:09 PM

That's true tk. I'm probably just still under the influence of the comment diversion of two nights ago were I was one of the very few who didn't opt for indie-emo bands in mentioning the best bands of the aughts. I found that weird considering how much love some roc-metal-blues posts have got around here. And I expected people who like thoughtful films to like prog rock complicated thoughtful music. Not judging anyone here. Musically my tastes differ a lot I think while on the movies bit we agree more.

Posted by: barf at June 24, 2009 12:13 PM

To respond to your point, John Denver's Wingman, if we look at bands like The Decemberists or Death Cab For Cutie, indie bands can grow significantly on a major label. And now that the major labels are losing clout thanks to independent companies, they are less controlling of artistic content. And my basic point about this album is that it seems more likely than most to be able to appeal to a mainstream audience while maintaining indie credibility.

Posted by: ChristianH at June 24, 2009 12:29 PM

Nice review, Christian. I like '1901' and I think I'll have to look into these guys more. Thanks!

Posted by: lizzieborden at June 24, 2009 12:36 PM

If you ever get the chance to see Phoenix live, do it! I worked at Bonnaroo this year, and rather than see Phish I saw Phoenix. It was by far my favorite show- and I'd only heard a track or two of their before seeing them.

Posted by: cdub at June 24, 2009 1:02 PM

Hello!

Definitely a fan of these, and I'm happy to see that the author enjoyed the album.

Saw them live recently in Montreal, and they put on a fantastic show. Sounded great, plenty of energy, and very charismatic to boot.

Maybe WAP will grow on me more with time (like fungus). I still find their previous effort, "It's Never Been Like That", a better album. Bah, just my two pennies.

Posted by: Lil' Toes at June 24, 2009 1:06 PM

I love love loved this album the first two times I listened. Now I'm left wishing I could hear it for the first time all over again. It gets old fast. But it is some of the best "first time listening" music out there. Similar to Passion Pit.

Posted by: Chris P. at June 24, 2009 1:18 PM

I have been in love with Phoenix since I heard their song "Long Distance Call" a few years ago. This album isn't their best but it's still great. I really hope it means good things for them, because I hope they'll be around for a long time.

As for the whole indie vs mainstream arguement, here's my thought: I love these guys. I want to share them with everyone! I like their music, why wouldn't I want others to hear it & like it as well?

Posted by: Melissa at June 24, 2009 2:06 PM

Cool write-up. Been a big fan of Phoenix for a couple years now. I'm seeing them at the Wiltern on Sunday!

Posted by: matt at June 24, 2009 3:37 PM

any reason for the jenny lewis headline?

Posted by: mae at June 24, 2009 4:02 PM

I was wondering that too, mae.

I love this album. And I forced myself not to listen to it too many times in a row because I knew I would get sick of it, and I didn't want to ruin it for myself. It's worked so far. I am a genius.

Posted by: SaBrina at June 24, 2009 11:17 PM

I was trying to encapsulate the indie music revolution and the fact that, unlike punk or grunge, it could very well succeed without evoking rage but rather by capturing the ear.

Plus, I came up with it last minute, and I just listened to that album again the other day.

Posted by: ChristianH at June 25, 2009 12:00 AM

barf, since I just went off in that same comment diversion you mentioned (see my comment, it'll probably the last one on there for a very long time, if not forever), I'm going to try to hold back on you on the lumping together of indie and emo, which are totally different genres of rock music. But I will say that your definition of prog rock seems skewed. Look at an indie band like The Decemberists. Their newest album was a 17-track rock opera based around classic folklore and dark themes. TV on the Radio is often considered prog rock because they are progressing punk to its next logical conclusion (by infusing it with hip-hop and techno). Sufjan Stevens' concept albums based around different U.S. states could easily be considered prog (not to mention his musical style, which is very unique in music today).

I'm just saying, instead of complaining about our music coverage (since I don't think you're actually listening to the bands we review), offer some reccomendations for us, or broaden your horizens, or at least come up with some legitimate criticism of the music in question rather than generalizing for the sake of generalization.

Posted by: ChristianH at June 25, 2009 12:33 AM

Mars doesn't come over as whiny at all to me. His voice stretches over quite a range.
I really needed this album, jaunty, poppy without desperately trying to appeal to twelve-year-olds and most of all, it's short!

Posted by: Adere at June 25, 2009 6:03 AM

I saw them live in Paris about a month ago at La Cigale, it was amazing, and beautiful really. I personally think this is their best. they have achieved something here. The whole album is brilliant. Their previous work was great, but sometime not that great. I mean the albums 'Alphabetical' and 'It's Never Been Like That' for instance had some great songs, but also weak ones. Anyway I'm definetly a fan (and not because I'm french)

Posted by: rg at June 26, 2009 1:54 AM

















mindholeblowers.gif viral_hits.gif
>> Pajiba Movie Posters

>> Pop Culture's 20 Greatest Dancing GIFs

>> The 100 Greatest Insults of All Time

>> The "Other" 100 Greatest Movie Quotes

>> The 100 Greatest Movie Threats of All Time

>> The Sean Bean Death Reel

>> Chicks Dig Beards: It's Science

>> The Coolest TV Show Title Sequences

>> The Most Rewatchable Movies

>> The Most Expensive Movies of All Time