Mr. Brooks / Phillip Stephens
Mr. Brooks would have us believe that its title character, played by the woefully lethargic Kevin Costner, is “addicted to killing;” that, like Michael Rooker’s Henry of Henry: Portrait of a Serial Killer, it’s an undeniable part of his being, something he can’t control. But Brooks is no madman, at least not a haphazard one; he stalks random victims for days at a time, stealthily breaks into their homes, shoots them, and then carefully erases every possible trace of evidence. It’s a somewhat troubled premise, but one that still could’ve been sold with either charismatic actors or a solid script. No such luck. For one thing, Costner, still parading around as a self-parody of his Robin Hood torpor, can’t convincingly play a killer - his attempts at sangfroid all look like boredom or even catatonia, almost as if he wolfed down two Xanax horse pills before his scenes.
Likewise, writer/director Bruce Evans can’t sculpt a believable story to frame Costner. Hell, even a non-ridiculous one would have been nice! But it’s almost as if Evans tries to cram three separate but equally ludicrous films into one. All three are only intermittently engaging, but are fully boring and sheepishly acted.
The first plot strand is merely Mr. Brooks and his quasi-struggle with his “killer urges” which are, for some reason, personified as a rival personality named Marshall (and played by William Hurt). Other than this Marshall aspect, Brooks is an upstanding business mogul and philanthropist who muddles through his boring life until his troubled daughter (Danielle Panabaker) drops out of college and shows up at home. To top it off, Brooks suspects that his pretty-in-pink offspring may have similarly murderous drives. Serial killer-ism is apparently genetic. Who knew?
A second strand emerges after Brooks’ latest killings, wherein he barged in on a pair of boinking socialites only to be witnessed and photographed by a wanking voyeur (Dane Cook). Cook’s character, who is never named, tries to blackmail Brooks so that - get this - Brooks will instruct him in the delicate art of murder! I’ve already said that Costner is unconvincing as an Everyman who moonlights as a murderer, but Dane Cook is positively embarrassing in the same role. As we’ve already seen, Dane Cook has long worn out his welcome in the media, but this film role actually comes dangerously close to meta-awareness - he plays a blundering nincompoop either so well or so badly that it’s hard to actually distinguish a performance in there.
Then there’s the cop on Brooks’ tail (Demi Moore, who evidently still exists), who occupies a subplot that, but for a few preposterous leaps in continuity near the end, has little if anything to do with either Brooks or his bumbling new sidekick. She’s on the trail of Brooks’ killing spree, but she’s also in the middle of a divorce from her husband (an utter dickbag), and she’s being stalked by another criminal she put away and … what the fuck does this have to do with anything? The writing in Mr. Brooks was so bad it became almost weird.
The movie is a long, enervating journey with monstrous, laughable plot holes - a delightful yarn about “sophisticated” men who stalk and kill people not because they’re really psychopaths, but simply for shits and giggles, and it’s acted out with such utter drowsiness that it can’t even become comedy. Only Hurt comes close to selling his role as a deranged alter-ego - he hisses and absolutely chews the scenery with relish, probably because he’s the only one here who recognizes a farce when he sees it.
Phillip Stephens is the lead critic for Pajiba. He lives in Fayetteville, AR.
Gracie | | Knocked Up
Comments
Sigh....was this movie screened by critics? It couldn't have been.
Posted by: Daphne at June 1, 2007 10:15 PM
I kinda knew when I heard about it that this would be a honker, and then the trailers I saw confirmed it; but still: Oh, dear.
Demi Moore, who evidently still exists
I LOVE that.
Posted by: Jerce at June 1, 2007 10:24 PM
I haven't even read the review yet, but the title has me in a fit of giggles.
I've done a massive amount of reading for the past week and am pretty tired of looking at words in general, so when I've purged some from my immediate mental capacity I may have something more intelligent to say. Or not.
Posted by: stardust savant at June 1, 2007 11:13 PM
Man, I really need something good to watch. Somebody, quick, make me a decent movie.
p.s. there is a typo, but I won't say where because I don't need that kind of validation.
Posted by: the_Wakeful at June 1, 2007 11:43 PM
I gave up on Costner looooong ago.
And here I thought Demi Moore had just quietly slipped into oblivion. Who knew?
Posted by: TK at June 1, 2007 11:50 PM
Dammit....I was really looking forward to this. I absolutely LOVE William Hurt and really wanted to see him steal every scene he was in.
Yeah....I'm still going to check it out tomorrow. I suck at life.
Posted by: Cory at June 1, 2007 11:52 PM
i have been waiting for pajiba's review of this movie ever since i first saw the trailers. you guys didn't let me down.
Posted by: steph at June 2, 2007 12:24 AM
I was strong in my conviction after being taken to see "Water World" by an idiot ex-boyfriend that I would never watch Kevin Costner in anything, ever again. And I havent.
When I see a trailor and he's in it, I know I'll never watch it. I cant stand him, he's an awful actor and he brainwashed my parents, and their generation into liking him.
Not only did his face immediately turn me off to this movie, but then Dane Cook came on screen and it made me wretch. Throw Demi Moore into the mix and you've got a movie that could only be used as torture.
A badly written movie with 3 of the worst actors in it? Oh, that's gonna be box office GOLD!
Posted by: Elizebeth at June 2, 2007 12:49 AM
Yeah, I'll just watch through Dexter again.
Posted by: Bucko at June 2, 2007 3:33 AM
Starring Kevin Costn...
PASS!!!!
Posted by: BarbadoSlim at June 2, 2007 8:46 AM
I honestly want to know who in their right mind thought Kevin Costner could play a serial killer. Just because he butchers his films, doesn't mean he is effective at murdering people. Same with Demi Moore. She was on point back in the day, but heck, she couldn't play a convincing stripper. Although, in the interest of full disclosure, there may have been a wee bit of physical enjoyment from that Charlie's Angels sequel. I am weak.
Just give me one spoiler: does Dane Cook get killed? Since you weren't squealing in joy, I will have to assume either he didn't die, or the death was so ridiculously underwhelming that it sucked the joy right out of seeing Stooperfinger kick the bucket and be quiet for more than two seconds.
You know what is really scary? Those Promicin 'ads' on the sides there. Those things are freaking me out. I look over there, start reading, and forget they are promotions for "The 4400". Seriously, for a few seconds, I think they are real and really creepy. I hope the new season are as good as those ads.
Posted by: Vermillion at June 2, 2007 9:04 AM
And here's another person who is all excited about the new season of The 4400. I actually clicked on the "They can get in your home" link, and actually the promo site's not bad at all. It has a nice authentic fanatic feel, and the links work and everything.
Yeah, I'll just watch through Dexter again. I don't get Showtime and I've been itching to see Dexter since I first read a review. The premise just fascinates me. The first-season DVD doesn't even have a release date yet! Has anyone here read the books it is based on? Can you tell us if they're any good?
Posted by: Jerce at June 2, 2007 9:18 AM
I'm with Jerce--Dexterless and chomping at the bit to see it...
But more importanly, WHAT IS THIS 4400 OF WHICH YOU SPEAK?
Posted by: Ranylt at June 2, 2007 9:21 AM
Jerce: I wouldn't be caught dead paying for Showtime yet I got to watch fare such as Dead Like Me and Dexter thru the magic of Torrents.
Posted by: BarbadoSlim at June 2, 2007 9:51 AM
WHAT IS THIS 4400 OF WHICH YOU SPEAK?
http://imdb.com/title/tt0389564/
It's on USA. Season 4 begins next Sunday night.
It's a bit difficult to explain without blathering on and on; but basically the premise is that a bunch of missing people--4,400, to be precise--who have been "abducted" by "aliens" over the decades are all returned to Earth at the same time. They are from different times in the 20th Century and have no memory of where they've been. Some or all have "special" abilities. And yes, of course, they are back for a reason.
It's low-budget, soapy, indifferently written and full of Canadians. It also explores some very rich themes, most notably xenophobia, the abuse of power, the exploitation of public paranoia by the government...and other stuff.
I'll be parked in front of the tube next Sunday night with a spoon.
Posted by: Jerce at June 2, 2007 10:52 AM
Phillip, I absolutely loved that review, and I was really getting into it, what with my utter hatred of all things Costner and such, but why did you have to cut it off so suddenly like that? I thought it ended too soon, and my initial thought was confirmed when I just now re-read it. Maybe this is such a horrible film that you didn't feel it deserved more than the precious few paragraphs you gave it, but I would have been more satisfied had you spewed a lot more bile on this sure-to-miss film. Otherwise, I thoroughly enjoyed reading it both times.
But the out-loud belly laugh of my day award goes to BarbadoSlim: "Starring Kevin Costn... PASS!!!!" I'm laughing even as I type this. No better way to spend my Saturday morning (aside from sleeping it away, that is)
Posted by: TMax at June 2, 2007 11:07 AM
Pass me a spoon, Jerce, and make room for me on that couch. I am all over that, based on your description...(tx)
Posted by: Ranylt at June 2, 2007 11:10 AM
I've been curious about the 4400 ever since I caught a random half-hour of it about a year ago. Glad to hear it's worth seeing. DVD rental--go!
Posted by: Kate K. at June 2, 2007 11:19 AM
"I honestly want to know who in their right mind thought Kevin Costner could play a serial killer. Just because he butchers his films, doesn't mean he is effective at murdering people."
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!Oh my, that freaking cracked me up. Good job Vermillion, for explaining so succinctly why Kevin Costner is a waste of space.
Posted by: tinmo at June 2, 2007 11:59 AM
I love that this movie is so bad, the comments have been tangented into talking about TV series'...
Posted by: nexus 6 at June 2, 2007 12:17 PM
If you really are interested in The 4400, you might want to get ahold of at least the Season 1 DVD and catch yourself up before next week, just so you're not totally lost.
I realized as I was writing my little synopsis above that NBC's Heroes more or less rips off the premise of this older series...Hmph.
Posted by: Jerce at June 2, 2007 12:32 PM
One of the fantastic dresses in the Vivian Westwood show at the De Young was proudly mentioned as being worn by Demi Moore, which drew a few derisive snorts from the assembled museum-goers last night. How strange that she should come across my radar twice in 24 hours! I'm STILL not going anywhere near this craptacular snorefest, thank you Philip for confirmation.
Posted by: Capn Gravy at June 2, 2007 1:46 PM
I knew this movie would be total shit. I said so and even had the nerve to criticize Kevin's acting skills on this movie's IMDB board. I don't think I'm allowed to post in there anymore.
Posted by: Candy at June 2, 2007 5:15 PM
People who like Dane Cook should be gang raped.
Posted by: Case at June 2, 2007 5:50 PM
Hmm well we don't get the dexter series over here but i just finished reading the books (which i LOVED and highly recommend- very very funny streak of dark humour all the way through) so all the way through reading this review i was thinking 'plagiarism much?' too bad its unoriginal AND boring because i do love serial killers. oh well next book comes out in a few months apparently- yay!
on a sidenote- who the fuck hires kevin costner anymore?! Hasn't he proved ENOUGH to these people that he sucks the life out of his films- do we really need one more lifeless film? ugh producers deserved a flop hiring him and deserve to be shot for hiring dane cook- don't encourage him for christ's sake!
Posted by: SAS at June 2, 2007 8:28 PM
The Amazon gods tell me the Dexter DVDs will be released August 21. *drooools* I don't have cable either so I watched it through a french version of Youube until they shut it down. :( But the DVDs will be here soon so: :)
Posted by: MaliceAlice at June 3, 2007 5:29 AM
I saw "Mr Brooks" last night and thought it was an *excellent* movie.
Posted by: Leaf at June 3, 2007 12:49 PM
And when I say *excellent*, I mean "the antithesis of everything that is, or might be construed or implied to be, excellent."
Costner still does one decent film about every five years, which somehow keeps him in the game. For example, see this site's spot-on review of "The Upside of Anger," which is a fine and moving film with a great twist ending. (The example before that is probably "Open Range," another fine film belonging to one Robert Duvall.)
Costner is good in Upside, though the film belongs to Joan Allen all the way. Costner does well in films where he plays what I perceive to be himself: low-key, well-grounded, with an appealing sense of humor, a decent man in extraordinary circumstances. E.g., "Dances with Wolves," "No Way Out." "Mr. Brooks" is not that movie.
Posted by: socalledonlycousins at June 3, 2007 1:49 PM
BTW, Leaf, just screwing around ...
Posted by: socalledonlycousins at June 3, 2007 1:52 PM
The strange this is I really don't like Kevin Costner, but during the movie I forgot who I was watching. He truly became the character for me, so he surprisingly did a good job.
Posted by: Leaf at June 3, 2007 3:53 PM
That's how I felt about "Open Range." I think I was the only person I know who liked that film, but KC really disappeared into the role of the reluctant gunfighter. He was great with Duval also.
Posted by: socalledonlycousins at June 3, 2007 4:10 PM
Dane Cook is the logical result of the long progression of entertainers, beginning with the Rolling Stones, who are all posturing and movement, but who have no act.
Leo Sayer, Sinbad, any Mexican comic, etc.
Posted by: Jack The Ripper at June 3, 2007 8:09 PM
No, I loved Open Range as well.
Posted by: G40 at June 4, 2007 6:41 AM
Oh Demi...
Costner hmnn...
Nuff Said.
Posted by: Jean at June 4, 2007 6:43 AM
So Basically this was American Psycho with a couple crappy sub plots thrown in, and instead of a voice over, they had Hurt act out the psycopath persona......am I getting warm?
Posted by: Manny at June 4, 2007 11:33 AM
It's not even *sort of* like American Psycho.
So has anyone else (besides Phillip and me) on this entire site actually seen this movie? It was sold out when I tried to see it the first time, so clearly they've sold more than two tickets to date.
Posted by: Leaf at June 4, 2007 11:50 AM
Leaf -- it did a respectable $10M over the weekend, so some folks are obviously lining up for it. I like William Hurt, so I'll definitely catch it on HBO (or similar).
Posted by: socalledonlycousins at June 4, 2007 12:16 PM
4400!!!! YEAY!!!!! I'm so excited for it! My hubby and I watched all of season 1 one Sunday during the fall and got caught up and we are die hard fans! We're so excited for Sunday. You have to give it a look see!
Posted by: Helcat at June 4, 2007 12:49 PM
I don't mind Costner. He's not one of those actors that makes me want to gouge my eyes out and ram knitting needles through my eardrums (Ben Stiller, calling Ben f***king Stiller). In a good film, say Upside of Anger, Costner is not going to tip the scales in the thumbs down direction. I personally enjoyed his character in Rumor Has It. But the catch is that it has to be a good film. He can't rescue dreck. And this sounds like dreck cubed. Next.
Posted by: denadn at June 6, 2007 1:56 PM
People who like Dane Cook should be gang raped.
Posted by: Case at June 2, 2007 5:50 PM
Your douche-fu is weak, my friend.
Posted by: Vi at June 8, 2007 12:58 AM
Saw this last night b/c it was on after 1408 at the drive-in. Fucking awesome. Perhaps it was the residual tension from the previous movie, or the several bottles of beer....but this was hilarious. So bizarre, such a laughable script, and it took itself so. very. seriously. I enjoyed every minute of it. But I guess the moral of the story is, get drunk or high before you see it, and it should be fun.
Posted by: Jen at June 23, 2007 1:50 PM
I'm in the middle of watching this farce and just came across another laughable plot hole (demi's hunch + newspaper in steering wheel) so I had to do a search just to see what other people had to say about the holes. Anyways, you guys are a riot, I got more enjoyment out of reading your comments than I'm getting from watching this mess of a film.
Posted by: Mr Brooks at July 18, 2007 4:57 PM
I'm gonna go out on a limb here and agree with Leaf. The number of people on here who jump on the Pajiba bandwagon and abuse films they haven't seen is ridiculous. Mr. Brooks? it wasn't bad. I thought Kevin Costner was alright in it and enjoyed the movie overall. As Leaf says, you forget it's Costner and believe him in his character, which is pretty much what acting should be. OK Demi sucked, but that's not news.
Posted by: bob bobson at October 29, 2007 6:23 AM

