web
counter
 

What Have You Got Against Gay Penguins? The 10 Most Banned Books in America

By Dustin Rowles | Posted Under Miscellaneous | Comments (35)



6a00d8341c630a53ef0147e422a6d1970b-800wi.jpg

The American Library Association, each year, keeps a record from teachers and librarians from around the country recording the number of objections raised against certain books. For the fifth year in a row, now, And Tango Makes Three tops the list of most challenged books. For the unfamiliar, it’s about the true story of two male Emperor Penguins hatching and parenting a baby chick at New York’s Central Park Zoo.

Hateful, bigoted people, of course, dislike the book, as they should. Gay penguins are melting the ice caps with all that gay penguin sex. The nine other books on the most challenged list are below, along with the chief objections (note, however, that the chief objection against Twilight is not: It’s a shitty, poorly written abstinence porn. Salinger fans, however, can rejoice! Catcher in the Rye has finally fallen out of the top ten, as has Alice Walker’s Color Purple.


1. And Tango Makes Three by Peter Parnell and Justin Richardson
Reasons: Homosexuality, religious viewpoint, unsuited to age group

2. The Absolutely True Diary of a Part-Time Indian by Sherman Alexie
Reasons: Offensive language, racism, sex education, sexually explicit, unsuited to age group, violence

3. Brave New World by Aldous Huxley
Reasons: Insensitivity, offensive language, racism, sexually explicit

4. Crank by Ellen Hopkins
Reasons: Drugs, offensive language, sexually explicit

5. The Hunger Games by Suzanne Collins
Reasons: Sexually explicit, unsuited to age group, violence

6. Lush by Natasha Friend
Reasons: Drugs, offensive language, sexually explicit, unsuited to age group

7. What My Mother Doesn’t Know by Sonya Sones
Reasons: Sexism, sexually explicit, unsuited to age group

8. Nickel and Dimed: On (Not) Getting By In America by Barbara Ehrenreich
Reasons: Drugs, inaccurate, offensive language, political viewpoint, religious viewpoint

9. Revolutionary Voices edited by Amy Sonnie
Reasons: Homosexuality, sexually explicit

10. Twilight by Stephenie Meyer
Reasons: Religious viewpoint, violence

(Source: ALA via LA Times)










Each Time You Like, Share, Tweet or Stumble a Pajiba Post, An Angel Does the Paul Rudd Dance



American: The Bill Hicks Story Review: "'Freebird!' The Mantra of the Moron" | "Garrow's Law:" "Ah, now we see the violence inherent in the system!"









Comments

Wait, how is The Hunger Games sexually explicit? It's violent for damned sure, but sexual? In the first book is kissing. That's it. Crazy book banners need to pull the copies of "Before You Meet Prince Charming" out of their panties.

Posted by: Julie at April 13, 2011 3:05 PM

The only thing I can think of with The Hunger Games is the scene where Katniss has Peeta strip so that she can treat his wounds...but I really don't see that as sexually explicit at all.

Posted by: Jenilane at April 13, 2011 3:20 PM

Yeah, I was thinking that too...I guess bare skin is JUST TOO SCARY.

Posted by: Julie at April 13, 2011 3:21 PM

Nickel and Dimed is one of the 10 most objectionable books? Who maintains this list? Wal-Mart?

Posted by: PaddyDog at April 13, 2011 3:23 PM

I'm with Julie in not understanding at all the complaint against Hunger Games that it is sexually explicit. Sure there's a bit of a scandal about whoring someone out later in the books, but no one ever actually talks about what happens in detail, just that the character was used in that way. Otherwise, it's all fairly chaste. Violence, hell yes, there's a lot of it, but it's not really sexual. There isn't time in that world for a lot of lovin', y'know?

Posted by: KatSings at April 13, 2011 3:23 PM

All this list does is make me want to check out these books (except Twilight)

Posted by: Sarah at April 13, 2011 3:24 PM

Now I'm itching to read some Salinger, thaaaaaanks.

Back to the article on Muslims in China...

Posted by: grace b at April 13, 2011 3:24 PM

So this list is fiction and non-fiction? I feel like banning a book like "Nickel & Dimed..." is like trying to whitewash reality. It ain't always pretty out there, but that's life.

Ugh. Godtopus forbid anyone read any of these books and learn to think for themselves.

Posted by: MelBivDevoe at April 13, 2011 3:32 PM

I'm surprised these people don't hate all penguins for just looking gay. I mean, they're all wearing tuxedos.

Posted by: Lauren at April 13, 2011 3:33 PM

The Hobbit was once on the banned list for being "subversive."

I almost got my teenaged butt suspended from 8th grade for doing a book report. The book? Breakfast of Champions by Vonnegut. The teacher and the school felt that even though it was freely available in the public library, it shouldn't be seen by impressionable teeners.

Posted by: The Wanderer at April 13, 2011 3:45 PM

Is this just for this year? Because I could swear to Christ that Mein Kampf is banned.

Posted by: DeistBrawler at April 13, 2011 4:00 PM

Ho, terrible, i couldn't have believed it was possible. There is nothing outrageous in this list of book, what's the problem ? Strange world.
(sorry for my english...)

Posted by: Hebergement photo at April 13, 2011 4:04 PM

Nickel and Dimed???

Funny to see this, just yesterday I was talking to a high school English teacher who refused to use an excerpt from that book because "IT'S JUST A LEFTIST BOOK!"

How so, though? She tries to see if she can survive on minimum wage.

Posted by: Snuggiepants at April 13, 2011 4:23 PM

I'm sort of proud that one of my absolute favorite books is on this list. It seems funny also that it's the only book left on this list that was published before 2000. In a way that's good news; the book-burners are focusing on the publicity of the modern releases and might finally be letting the classics alone.

And just for the record to the close-minded, moronic censors: try reading Brave New World in its entirety. Also try using your brain to process the words. You might find that one interpretation of it actually endorses some of the ideals that you superficially believe it assails.

Posted by: DarthCorleone at April 13, 2011 4:29 PM

ugh. the gays.

Posted by: gp at April 13, 2011 4:31 PM

I read this article to my husband, and he said "The top ten BAND books. That seems like a pretty narrow genre."
I said, "No honey, banned like forbidden."
He was horrified; he could not conceive of people requesting a book to be removed from the library. By God I do love that man.

Posted by: androstarr at April 13, 2011 4:32 PM

OK, I'll be that person: isn't "banned" overstating it? They list books that have gotten objections. You don't say anything about the books being banned.

There's not actually anything wrong with objecting to something. I agree that people who bitch about library books being available need to get a life, but still ... just because some uptight fundy asshole complains about the gay penguins doesn't mean nobody can read about gay penguins. It just means the uptight fundy asshole has nothing better to do. Let's not give these people more power than they actually have.

Posted by: Slash at April 13, 2011 4:38 PM

Did I accidentally buy the censored version of The Hunger Games? That is really upsetting. I did buy it at WalMart while I was on vacation in the Outer Banks, I guess since Walmart censors all of the music they sell, it would make sense that they would do the same to the books.
Shit. Now I am going to have to go see if I can find the raunchy version.

Posted by: DominaNefret at April 13, 2011 4:40 PM

This is one of those things that just irks me: challenged and banned are not the same thing. There are not, as far as I know, any out and out banned books in this country (not even Mein Kampf, you can buy it at Amazon).

This isn't even a list of books libraries stopped carrying because of challenges: it is a list based on 348 reports to the Office for Intellectual Freedom of the American Library Association. The press release says that there have been dozens of attempts to remove And Tango Makes Three, but no word on whether any of those attempts were successful.

While I think it is important to track challenges and act in cases of actual banning, the ALA's obsession with "banned" books is just...dumb.

Posted by: Lee at April 13, 2011 4:53 PM

What? No Huck Finn?

Posted by: BWeaves at April 13, 2011 4:57 PM

Mein Kampf isn't banned. I read it (in English) back when I was about ten years old.

Posted by: The Wanderer at April 13, 2011 4:59 PM

I live in a town with a recognized Native American tribe. We even have an Indian Education Office headed by a woman who offers cultural lectures to teachers and study groups for children in the tribe. They banded together in the fall to get The Absolutely True Diary of a Part-Time Indian removed from the high school curriculum because of one passage. Some racist kid is taunting the books titular character for being the offspring of a black person and a buffalo (in far more colorful language). This particular tribe was vilified in the first Weird NJ book with a similar twisted and racist history of their people. I even supported the ban when the teachers wouldn't accept the condition of the Indian Education Office providing an alternate take on the subject of racism.

The head of the English Department was blindsided by the effort as that book is taught nationwide without incident. Who could object when the end of the book makes a clear case against racism?

I guess she was off on that one.

Posted by: Robert at April 13, 2011 5:27 PM

For clarification, if the English Department used that book as a tool to discuss racism transcending into history and cultural acceptance or like topic, I would be the first to accept it back in the school. They refused, and only then was I for removing the book. The book is still in the library, but it can't be taught in the classrooms.

The point of the lesson for this department: high school is hard so why not start with an easy book. Not "High School is hard because of racism/adversity/cultural acceptance." Nope. Just High School is hard and this book makes it easier to get back into the grind of work after summer.

Posted by: Robert at April 13, 2011 5:30 PM

Fair points, Slash and Lee, on the verbiae. But the objections to these books were made by people that I think it's safe to assume want them banned. That alone is enough to raise my ire.

Posted by: DarthCorleone at April 13, 2011 6:01 PM

Verbiage, that is.

Posted by: DarthCorleone at April 13, 2011 6:02 PM

Sherman Alexie's Diary of a Part Time Indian is a laugh-out loud-funny, poignant, sad, and triumphant, an amazing book.

And Barbara Ehrenreich, really? I mean what I remember about that book was that maid services don't necessarily actually 'clean' your house...and that minimum wage jobs are shitty, but really, banned?

Posted by: Alarmjaguar at April 13, 2011 6:20 PM

I read this article to my husband, and he said "The top ten BAND books. That seems like a pretty narrow genre."

Challenge accepted!
1) And the Band Played On
2) Band of Brothers
3) Junie B., First Grader: 1-Man Band (Junie B. Jones #22)
4) Olivia Forms a Band
5) The Rubber Band (Nero Wolfe)
6) The Boys in the Band
7) Band Fags! (It's the title, sorry...)
8) Band Nerds: Poetry From the 13th Chair Trombone
9)Marching Bands Are Just Homeless Orchestras, Half-Empty Thoughts Vol. 1
10)I Don't Care About Your Band: What I Learned from Indie Rockers, Trust Funders, Pornographers, Felons, Faux-Sensitive Hipsters, and Other Guys I've Dated

Okay, so it was harder than it looked. But I've found a few band books I want to read now...

/me marches off...

Posted by: TK the Other (delurking) at April 13, 2011 7:20 PM

Catcher in the Rye should be banned for being overrated. I hate this book so much!

Posted by: Az at April 13, 2011 10:03 PM

The Hunger games was sexually explicit??

flips through book hungrily

LIES!!!!

Posted by: Denesteak at April 13, 2011 11:19 PM

Lee, if you mean banned in the entire country, you're probably right, though I wouldn't buy the Anarchist Cookbook in any way that creates a record. However, many of these titles ARE banned in individual locations.

After hearing about Nickel and Dimed the other day I used the Google to magically look up why. In one location it was because of the following two sentences... 'But Jesus makes his appearance here only as a corpse. The living man, the wine guzzling vagrant and precocious socialist is never once mentioned.' in reference to a revival she attended. Oh noes! She used somewhat harsher terms to um, accurately describe Jesus. That couple is also going after Water for Elephants.

Another location was a HS in PA that used the book in their AP English class. The complaint was that the book promotes socialism and is also anti-christian. The complainer was a single man and not a parent, but as a taxpayer felt it was his duty.

In some regards I feel like I shouldn't give a shit what some non-local high school or library chooses to do, but I also feel that it's a slippery slope in what is often hoped to be accomplished by this type of ideological banning, and I feel quite uncomfortable if generations of students learn for example that the War of Northern Aggression was never about slavery.

Posted by: Rudy at April 14, 2011 4:17 AM

Ha! Found a copy of Brave New World yesterday for 10nis (about 2$) at a 2nd hand store :)

Posted by: Sarah J-Town at April 14, 2011 7:47 AM

I walk the corner to the rubble that used to be a library. Line up to the mind cemetary now. What we don't know keeps the contracts alive and moving. They don't got to burn the books they just remove them. While arms warehouses fill as quick as the cells. Rally 'round the family, pocket full of shells.

Posted by: Zach de la Rocha at April 14, 2011 8:01 AM

Shut up you NAZI COW! Do you wanna piece of me? Do you?!!

*and scene*

Posted by: bananapanda at April 14, 2011 3:11 PM

I'm still amazed Go Ask Alice isn't banned. We used to pass it around and hide it in our closets. It's the *true* diary of a drug addicted teen who slides quickly into whoredom and homelessness. *Supposedly* her parents found her diary after she died of an overdose.

Posted by: bananapanda at April 14, 2011 3:13 PM

The most offensive thing about HUNGER GAMES is that the shi# author stole from the Japanese Manga/and movie Battle Royale. She stole almost everything in its entirety from this story, even in the dumbed-down version in the movie you can see the things she blatently stole. And us silly Americans will never know, because most will enver even glance at Japanese literature or media. :(

Posted by: Seri at April 14, 2011 3:34 PM