web
counter
 

The Minor Fall, The Major Lift

By Steven Lloyd Wilson | Posted Under Miscellaneous | Comments (45)



jeffbuckley.jpg

Now I’ve heard there was a secret chord
That David played, and it pleased the Lord

I couldn’t hear rhythm until I was 20 years old. Dancing utterly mystified me. It wasn’t so much that I danced badly (though I did), it’s that I had no concept of what dancing was. I could not see any correlation between the movement of dance and the sound of the music. It was just gibberish. I couldn’t even tap my foot along to a song. I almost failed wave mechanics my sophomore year because the professor explained everything using musical metaphors, which is actually very helpful, if you have the slightest fucking clue about music. For me it was like explaining colors to Helen Keller using jazz as a reference point. I had assumed I was simply musically retarded and that would be the end of it. I didn’t know I was missing anything.

Vodka and spandex changed that one delightful evening.

The girl I was seeing at the time was going through a major swing music phase (this was around the time of that six month swing resurgence led by Big Bad Voodoo Daddy, etc.). I went to some swing dance classes with her. After a couple of sessions, the teacher just asked me to sit and observe because I ruined the class for whomever I was partnered with. So said girl decided that she’d get me to understand rhythm. The key was listening to part of the music, not all of the music. Just listen to the drums, ignore the rest, the drums are the beat. And with that almost stupidly simple insight that no one had ever seen fit to mention, rhythm entered my world in the form of the purple spandexed ass. It moved as the drums moved. Thank you purple spandexed ass, you and seven screwdrivers changed my perspective of the world.

But you don’t really care for music, do you?

I describe this personal musical retardation as an explanation for my own shortcomings: music reviews might as well be written in Greek for how well their descriptions penetrate my musically addled mind. This is not intended as a criticism of the wonderful music reviews of TK and others, but rather an attempt to feel out where my comprehension falls short. I am accustomed to understanding, and so a blind spot is terrifically frustrating. I feel compelled to poke and prod at it until I figure out why it is a blind spot.

Lyrics drive music for me. A paragraph describing how music sounds is almost meaningless to my mind. I know what the adjectives mean, what a “fast,” “angry,” “energetic,” “aggressive” song should sound like, but I don’t feel that translate into any sort of visceral reaction. On the other hand, “It’s about being too late to tell your estranged father you love him” (“4 A.M.”), “Some people say it’s about sex, but I think it’s a fuck you to god” (“Hallelujah”), “It’s a set of letters back and forth between a singer and a fan slowly going insane,” (“Stan”). Those are the sort of descriptions that drag me to hunt down a song, regardless of genre.

It goes like this: the fourth, the fifth

I think the highest form of music, the songs that really stick in my soul, are poetry set to music. I heard Leonard Cohen the first time on the Natural Born Killers soundtrack and was hooked. My introduction to Bob Dylan was the U2 cover of “All Along the Watchtower” on Rattle and Hum. These two have been the twin pillars, the poet laureates, piecing together words that draw other artists like sirens on the rocks. Other bands cover their songs, add layers of harmony and melody, flesh out the bones, but the soul still lives in the words.

Meaning is not always easy to wring from the words, but it is there. Good poetry unravels slowly, over the decades of your life, so what seemed triumphant doggerel at fifteen reveals a sad and melancholy heart when you’re thirty.

Half the time these type of songs don’t even have choruses, because hammering the same verse home again and again just gets in the way of drawing more words. Repetition can be an effective lyrical tool, but lesser artists tend to use it as a crutch, so that they can stretch the four good lines of a song into decent radio length. That’s why Nickelback and Creed can manage to sound good in short bursts of 30 seconds, but tally up the non-repeating parts of their albums and you’d be lucky to gleen a unique three minutes out of any of their albums.

The minor fall, the major lift

Some bands aren’t poets so much as storytellers, delivering complete narratives packed into a few lines of verse. Other bands spend entire careers writing album after album filled with variations on the same couple of songs about love. Love is a rather boring subject when decoupled from all the myriad context of the rest of living. Ballads seem a poor substitute for songs about the other ninety percent of life.

Flogging Molly is a particular favorite of mine, along with Social Distortion and Pulp. Their songs are difficult to succinctly summarize but always seem to tell the story of something, whether it’s reminiscing over the disaster of your twenties (“Ball and Chain”), or telling your son why he shouldn’t look up to you (“Little Soul”), or even just the life and times of the craziest pirate to ever haunt the seas (“Salty Dog”).

Maybe it’s because I’ve always been a writer first, but it’s those stories that draw me to a band. It’s amazing how much story can be distilled down into a few well crafted words. Poke around the internet and you can find micro-fiction boards, contests. Complete stories in fifty words or less. Such compressed stories leave all the non-critical details to the reader, they just sweep broad brushstrokes onto the canvas that the mind renders into something complete. Songs about stories work the same way.

The baffled king composing Hallelujah

“The last person on earth sits in a locked room. A knock rattles the door.” They say that is the shortest horror story in the world, because of the invisible monster that must lurk beyond the door. It may be the shortest story, but it is only a horror story by dint of the reader. An old time bible-thumper thinks it’s a beautiful story because it’s Jesus come knockin’. The optimist thinks the knock is proof that someone else survives. The cynic thinks the same thing. The nihilist thinks that the door will open to reveal nothing but a petrified tumbleweed thunking against the door in the forlorn wind blowing across the blasted plains. It’s a matter of perspective. It’s why Dickens wrote that it was both the best of times and the worst of times. It’s why we can peel back so many layers from so few words in poetry and song.

My particular affliction has led to the appearance of an eclectic taste in music, but that’s like saying a blind person has an eclectic taste of color palettes. I don’t mind twang in country, volume in metal, or the quiet spaces in acoustic folk, not because I musically appreciate all those things, but because I’m not really listening to the music. It’s why techno, jazz and classical music more or less baffle me. A song without lyrics is like a novel without words.

Steven Lloyd Wilson is the last scion of Norse warriors and the forbidden elder gods. He is a hopeless romantic who can be found wandering San Diego’s strip malls and suburbs looking for his mislaid soul and waiting for the revolution to come. Burning Violin is still published weekly on Wednesdays at www.burningviolin.com, along with assorted fiction and other ramblings.









Inside the Actor's Studio Review | Where You Get to Show off Your Pretentious Side, A**hole













Comments

Agreed Agreed A Thousand Times Over. And you've put it better than I really could've ever thought. Lyrics as the thing that makes it re-listenable. Entirely true.
But... has your history with rhythm ever lead you to believe that you were the whitest man in the world?

Posted by: Optimus Rhyme at March 18, 2009 3:30 PM

Stipe, er Steven, way to go. Seriously, every week I find your column getting better and better. Keep up the excellent work!

Posted by: Mike R. at March 18, 2009 3:31 PM

Though I can't entirely relate, (I enjoy the music as much as the lyrics) this is a lovely piece. Your columns are quickly becoming my favorite reads.

Posted by: Cindy at March 18, 2009 3:34 PM

Beautiful article, even if I can't quite agree. I'm far more moved by melody, lyrics are often a second layer to me. I think part of it was that I grew up not understand what anyone was saying in songs in English, so I was always more about the music itself.

I started singing that song out loud the second I saw the title. Beautiful work.

Posted by: figgy at March 18, 2009 3:37 PM

John.
Cale.

Posted by: Jay at March 18, 2009 3:38 PM

Please listen to Airborne Toxic Event. Their songs are stories to me, both the music and words evocative. Also, they totally remind me of Social Distortion... maybe mixed with The Clash or Violent Femmes.

Posted by: Katers at March 18, 2009 3:39 PM

That kind of made me sad. I feel like you have resigned yourself to missing so much. But then, I've been a classical musician for going on 15 years now and I get an excessive amount of joy out of a good Bach fugue, so I'm definitely talking from a different worldview.

I'm glad you can enjoy music but I am so sorry for what you are missing.

And I am so fucking sick of Hallelujah now. I may have liked it in the first Shrek, but it was SO jarringly out of place in Watchmen.

Posted by: Anne (in Reno) at March 18, 2009 3:45 PM

I'm the odd one out in my family in that I listen to the music more than the lyrics.

Posted by: Snath at March 18, 2009 3:48 PM

Were you born a poor black child?

Posted by: phaedawg at March 18, 2009 3:49 PM

There's nothing to be embarrassed about (not saying you are, but sometimes people end up sounding almost apologetic for things like this, and they shouldn't). As I've said before, different people listen to music in different ways. Lord knows there's music that I just don't get or understand... but I would never say it's bad.

Well, unless it's by Miley Cyrus. And you don't like her, right?

RIGHT?

Posted by: TK at March 18, 2009 3:53 PM

TK: Miley Cyrus makes music? I thought she read audiobooks for sealions.

Posted by: stipe42 at March 18, 2009 4:00 PM

My God, is this what music is like for white people? I feel like there should be a telethon.

"Your donation of only $5 a month can save little Madison from a lifetime of clapping on one and three."

Posted by: Tracer Bullet at March 18, 2009 4:09 PM

Gosh Stipe, I wish I could invite you to come to the Leonard Cohen concert in Chicago with me since you're a true believer, but my extra tix were spoken for within seconds of my announcing I had them.

Also, Anne in Reno: Major disagreement with you here. Hallelujah was out of place in Shrek, it totally belongs in Watchmen, not least because it's sung by the master himself and not one of the many copiers.

Posted by: PaddyDog at March 18, 2009 4:10 PM

That was beautifully written. I am generally more interested in the lyrics than the melody of a song, but I have a real, visceral reaction when the two are perfectly combined. Hence, I have always enjoyed Jeff Buckley's version of Hallelujah better than any of the others.

The lyric love has put me in some awkward spots over the years; I spent an unfortunate amount of my early teens with Alanis Morrisette, late teens with Ms. DiFranco and my early 20s listening to way too much Bright Eyes. I'm not nearly so emo now, but I also cry way more easily, so it's sort of a wash...

Posted by: elizabeth at March 18, 2009 4:16 PM

"A song without lyrics is like a novel without words."

This makes me very sad, and I couldn't disagree more. As a musician, I can't imagine the world that you must live in, and I truly feel sorry for you. The Helen Keller analogy is apt, but I don't know if you fully realize that the quote I pulled above is proof of your own, non-metaphorical handicap.

For Optimus to call it "entirely true" seems to miss that point. This is a lamentation of subjective experience, not a declaration of insight.

Posted by: Bucko at March 18, 2009 4:17 PM

I plead being a teenager when I last saw Shrek, PaddyDog, and that possibly being the first time I heard Hallelujah.

And I stand by my Watchmen statement, there was a lot of jarring stuff on that soundtrack for me, even though the songs themselves were all good.

Posted by: Anne (in Reno) at March 18, 2009 4:21 PM

So...you mention rhythm and lyrics...what about emotional expressiveness in the singer's voice (or just music by itself)? How do you feel about Billie Holiday? Can you listen to Callas singing Vissi d'Arte and appreciate the heartbreak in her voice even though you don't necessarily know what she's saying? (don't look up the lyrics...lyrics are not opera's strong point)

Posted by: s. pisaster at March 18, 2009 4:33 PM

I s'pose I meant entirely true to me. Should've tacked on an IMHO. Keep keeping me on my toes, Bucko.

Posted by: Optimus Rhyme at March 18, 2009 4:38 PM

You just surprised me, Optimus.

As the first commenter (and the only one loaded when I finally got around to reading the tab I opened the page with) I felt like the very real sadness that I felt having read the piece was not being takes as sad, but reinforced as truth!

It baffles me that this rings true for people - and i was not expecting it to be met with "entirely true."

Would you also be unable to enjoy a movie without dialogue or narration? I'm a musician and a video editor, and I'm often struck by the artistic similarities, and I feel that's an accurate analog. Would you say "A film without dialogue is like a novel without words?"

I don't think you would. To say that about music misses as much of the point of a song as watching a movie with your eyes shut.

Posted by: Bucko at March 18, 2009 4:47 PM

"Your donation of only $5 a month can save little Madison from a lifetime of clapping on one and three."
Oh Tracer Bullet, you make me giggle.

I found this article really interesting because I'm currently working on my Master's thesis. It's a musical/phonological/linguistic approach to the musical poetry of Langston Hughes. I know, I should have put that into the pretentious comment diversion, but whatever. While I used to focus on the instrumental aspects of music (I love good rhythm and syncopation, I get tingly), lately I've been paying more attention to the rhythm assigned to lyrics and which syllables are allowed to go to which beats.

Now I'm even boring myself. I know this isn't interesting to anyone else. Good article!

Posted by: Sharon at March 18, 2009 4:47 PM

With due deference to the composer, I can't recommend "I'm Your Fan", the 1991 "alternative" all-star Cohen tribute album, enough. I've never seen "Shrek", but apparently they used John's version (which is on said tribute)! I think I like Leonard's songs in others' hands, but I prefer original Tom Waits, so I can understand the preference.

There's nothing to miss if there's no joy as yet to glean from instrumental music, so I can feel neither happy nor sad for Mr. Wilson. It's no one's fault and not his loss if nothing's struck his fancy. Something might yet, or it might never. I'm never gonna enjoy green bean casserole, however lauded it is, because I'm just never gonna like those goddamn french-fried onions. Doesn't mean my tongue is handicapped, so pity me not.

Regarding "Watchmen", I don't get what's jarring. Everything fits. Putting "First We Take Manhattan" into the latter half of the credits was pretty witty too. And the perfect, perfect, perfect (and correct) use of "All Along The Watchtower" makes me all tingly each time I've seen it. Something about the sound of those three guys against silent Mars really pleases me, but making Alan and Dave's page come alive like that was simply thrilling.

Mind you, even though "The Sound of Silence" sounds fantastic coming out of a big theater sound system, I still wish they would've used "The Comedians", as Alan did (Roy Orbison's version that Elvis rewrote for him, not the original. Good heavens).

Posted by: Jay at March 18, 2009 4:57 PM

I guess I'm the opposite--the "music" (melody, rhythm, etc) is what drives me, and the lyrics complement or even complete the music. Bad lyrics can demean, or even destroy good music, but excellent music can exist independently of lyrics.

For me, the most reliable indicator of "good" music (including lyrics) is the passion with which it was written and is performed. I like all genres of music, as long as it is performed with real passion. Maybe "passion" is subjective, but I swear I can tell the difference between some poser belting out words and a truly passionate performer who cares about the music and lyrics and is singing/playing because he or she loves it, as opposed to someone performing for just fame, glory or a paycheck. There are even some songs and musicians that I don't like, but I recognize the real passion in their performances, and I respect that.

Wow, I didn't know I cared that much today. . .

Posted by: Hoof Hearted at March 18, 2009 5:04 PM

Interesting point of view. I cannot really relate, because lyrics are secondary to me. While they can make good music better, they cannot enhance shitty music.

There is a 'school' of music here in Germany, called after the city of Hamburg. Most of the bands belonging to that school play a similar style of music. It is solely lyric driven, and I agree that those lyrics are sometimes very well written. But the music these bands play is so shallow and trite that it makes me genuinely angry. I cannot understand what people see in them. I think those artists would be better of simply writing poetry.

Posted by: FabMax at March 18, 2009 5:13 PM

This really is an interesting article, because I've never heard of anyone who listens to music this way. I know a lot of people care deeply about lyrics, of course, but I've always assumed that the sound of the music itself also influenced their enjoyment.

I'm with figgy in that the sound of music is almost always more important than the lyrics, which is a little strange, since I grew up wanting to be a writer and never particularly enjoyed music lessons.

Posted by: SaBrina at March 18, 2009 6:03 PM

What I don't understand is do you only like singers singing in monotone? Do you only like rappers that just say words to beat without any intonations? I'm not here to rag on you (since I rarely actually ever post anyway), but lyrics that are sung are actually music.

To take it to the logical extreme: take any song that you think is 'good' and just have it spoken aloud like poetry. Sure it might be good, but it loses...everything.

I think the more apt analogy would be:
"A song without music is like a novel without words. A song without lyrics is like a novel without dialog."

Posted by: fifteenkeys at March 18, 2009 6:12 PM

Fascinating perspective. I was just blown away however by your being struck with U2's "All Along the Watchtower" Dylan cover. Jimi Hendrix OWNED that song. Dylan pretty much abdicated to him because NO ONE could come close to Hendrix.

U2? Like a lot of their stuff but this song?

Whoopdidoo . . . .

Posted by: NeoCleo at March 18, 2009 6:29 PM

My introduction to Bob Dylan

The point was that it was the first time he heard Bob Dylan's words. No value was being assigned to the quality of that particular cover compared to others (and no others had been consciously heard anyway), especially since the words are specifically the point here.

He's paying tribute to Bob Dylan's lyric writing, you see.

Posted by: Jay at March 18, 2009 6:36 PM

As many people have said, I also think that a song doesn't necessarily need lyrics. I submit for your consideration 'Fanfare for the common man' (say the Emerson, Lake and Palmer version). Or most of the work of Vangelis. Or, as we're on a film review site, the music of Ennio Morricone and Elmer Bernstein.

I can't not have a smile on my face when I hear some of their stuff.

I agree with Fifteenkeys' comment that a song without lyrics is like a novel without dialog, though I've read and enjoyed quite a few of those as well :)

Posted by: JureF at March 18, 2009 6:41 PM

The nihilist thinks that the door will open to reveal nothing but a petrified tumbleweed thunking against the door in the forlorn wind blowing across the blasted plains.

Shit, does this mean I'm a nihilist? That was my first idea, that a tree branch or something struck the door.

Posted by: SaBrina at March 18, 2009 7:10 PM

I have a friend who at 35 still has no rhythm. But he is almost certainly the whitest man I know. I'm glad you were able to discover rhythm for yourself by listening to the drum beat, but that still limits you from the full experience. Rhythm is the part of the music you feel, not hear. My favorite music is the kind that makes me want to move my hips and butt, and the more subconscious it is, the better. I don't know if that's something that can be learned.

Posted by: katy at March 18, 2009 7:21 PM

If music without lyrics baffles you there's a simple remedy. Import a music file into Audacity and watch the waveform as the music plays. You'll be picking out patterns in no time. You'll also see how adjectives like energetic and languorous are really describing the waveform as well.

Posted by: Inaras at March 18, 2009 7:55 PM

"Your donation of only $5 a month can save little Madison from a lifetime of clapping on one and three."

Posted by: Tracer Bullet at March 18, 2009 4:09 PM

Beautiful

Posted by: Dave Shepherd at March 18, 2009 8:01 PM

The hell's wrong with the downbeat? Or are you calling James Brown white?

Posted by: Jay at March 18, 2009 8:10 PM

This article makes me sad.

Posted by: The Ross Sea Party at March 18, 2009 9:03 PM

Souza emphasizes the 1 and 3. James Brown emphasized the 1 over everything else and made it do some dirty, dirty things.

Posted by: Sharon at March 18, 2009 9:03 PM

you write beautifully. i've pretty much always understood music pretty well (trained classically as a pianist when i was little) but i agree completely about lyrics. they're the soul of the song, and most of the time its when i like the lyrics of a song that it becomes a mainstay in my life.

Posted by: mermily at March 18, 2009 9:18 PM

Steven, You might be interested in reading some of Dr. Oliver Sacks' books (such as "Musicophilia") about people who REALLY have problems processing music. They're fascinating.

Posted by: bucdaddy at March 18, 2009 9:46 PM

Funny, I have almost the opposite problem. Melody and rhythm are no hassle, but for the life of me I have major inability to get the lyrics. Blessings on bands/performers who put the fleepin' lyrics in the booklet, because otherwise I ain't gettin' 'em.

This makes it difficult for me to appreciate bands 'known for their lyrics.' Mumbling, crappy mixes, inarticulate howls and screams and lo-fi "We're too cool to make it easy for people to understand this stuff" bullshit gets old fast.

Granted, there may be something wrong with my hearing, but I still receive very high pitches just fine, thankyouverymuch. I just have real difficulties distinguishing lyrics from the music. (And yes, this carries over into real life. Ambient noise fucks up my comprehension of conversations so easily...)

Godtopus bless 80's bands that articulate. And opera. Boy, do those people articulate. (Bouquets to you classical musicians out there!)

Some of the most beautiful (and hummable) music I lose my shit to is instrumental.

Words are so very
Unnecessary....

Posted by: bjs1109 at March 18, 2009 9:47 PM

Two words: Nick Cave. If it's the lyrics that grab you then you need to listen to Nick Cave and the Bad Seeds, and Grinderman.

Album suggestions for the n00b: No More Shall We Part; The Lyre of Orpheus/Abattoir Blues; Dig!!! Lazarus Dig!!!

Current favourite snippet of lyric: Today's Lesson

Janie says we're all such a crush of want half-mad with loss
We are violated in our sleep and we weep and we toss and we turn and we burn
We are hypnotised we are cross-eyed we are pimped we are bitched
We are told such monstrous lies

The man's a wordsmith!

Posted by: hell.kelpie at March 18, 2009 10:07 PM

"Live Seeds" is a hell of a primer too (and also shames the rest of the catalog up that point).

Posted by: Jay at March 18, 2009 10:14 PM

Is this anything like being tone-deaf? I had a friend who was tone-deaf, and he described notes as 'thick' or 'thin'. He could listen to the same album over and over, because the tunes just never registered. I think he must have appreciated the beat and the lyrics instead.
Mind you, that doesn't explain his love of Abba....

Posted by: Tarn at March 19, 2009 5:29 AM

My particular affliction has led to the appearance of an eclectic taste in music, but that’s like saying a blind person has an eclectic taste of color palettes. I don’t mind twang in country, volume in metal, or the quiet spaces in acoustic folk, not because I musically appreciate all those things, but because I’m not really listening to the music
Me too! Not that the music is irrelevant, but a good 'story' can make or break a song. And I do enjoy instrumental music, but only as background. If I go to a concert it's because someone has asked me and I feel like I ought to, but really I'm bored. Maybe that is sad, and it really is like being colour blind, but at least I'm not the only one.

Posted by: ChrisD at March 19, 2009 7:33 AM

Dear Rowles,

Please stop Stipe from broadcasting his thoughts into my brain, I’ve put aluminum foil on my windows and I’ve made a aluminum foil helmet but nothing has seem to help.

Posted by: Pookie at March 19, 2009 8:30 AM

A song without lyrics is a tune.

A novel without words is toilet paper.

Get over yourself.

Posted by: Scott at March 19, 2009 8:36 AM

Wow. I really love classical music and am just befuddled by an inability to enjoy music sans lyrics.

Posted by: samantha t at March 19, 2009 4:40 PM

















mindholeblowers.gif viral_hits.gif
>> Pajiba Movie Posters

>> Pop Culture's 20 Greatest Dancing GIFs

>> The 100 Greatest Insults of All Time

>> The "Other" 100 Greatest Movie Quotes

>> The 100 Greatest Movie Threats of All Time

>> The Sean Bean Death Reel

>> Chicks Dig Beards: It's Science

>> The Coolest TV Show Title Sequences

>> The Most Rewatchable Movies

>> The Most Expensive Movies of All Time