web
counter
 

The Los Angeles Rainbow Squirrels

By C. Robert Dimitri | Posted Under Miscellaneous | Comments (30)



lasquirrels.jpg

Monday was National Coming Out Day. The Proposition 8 lawsuit sits in waiting, as the case for same-sex marriage in California has a pending hearing at a federal court of appeals before possibly moving on to the Supreme Court. The U.S. military’s “Don’t Ask Don’t Tell” policy is its own political firestorm at the moment and is on the cusp of abolishment. New York gubernatorial candidate Carl Paladino mouths off that “your children” would be much better off if they are not “brainwashed into thinking that homosexuality is an equally valid and successful option.” A sobering rash of recent suicides among youngsters reminds us that bullying, lack of tolerance, and the notion that being gay is bad are still far too prevalent in our society.

Thus, it seems an appropriate time to highlight that same lack of tolerance that has dismayingly infected the world of major league sports. Why should it matter where the NBA, the NFL, the NHL, and MLB stand on social issues? Whether the respect given is warranted or not, these leagues are composed of individuals that serve as role models for youth. Additionally, the mere games that these leagues provide for us inspire millions and influence public discourse. Would anyone claim that the positive example of Jackie Robinson in integrating Major League Baseball did not play at least some role in opening minds and allowing the Civil Rights Movement of the 1960s to take place? What happens on the fringes of these fields, courts, and rinks serves as both a current reflection and the bellwether for our future.

I did not frequently consider the issue of LGBT equality in my youth, but in my adulthood I have found it to be quite straightforward in its rationale. I see it as the final frontier in civil rights. I am frustrated by the fact that we have not settled quickly in the political and cultural spheres what seems to me to be a blatantly easy question to answer. Once we have surmounted it, then perhaps we could move on to more difficult questions that are worthy of debate, but some insist on holding our society back with the sort of attitudes that I can only envision will be viewed a century from now with substantial shame.

As it stands, none of the aforementioned four major North American team sports have an openly gay athlete within their ranks. It is easy for me as an outsider to angrily ask, “Why not? What sort of ridiculously prejudiced atmosphere prevents it?” I am not a player in any of these leagues, but I have seen and heard enough to have an idea of the thinking behind it. (On a related note, the closest I ever came to engaging in a cliché barroom fight was a direct result of another patron leading a chant of “Tony Homo” as Tony Romo and my Dallas Cowboys floundered against the New England Patriots. I mockingly applauded his wonderfully witty rhyming skills and stopped short of calling him a thoughtless bigot.)

In the NFL, three former players have come out, but they only did so once they left the league. David Kopay was the first to do so in 1975 after having played in the league from 1964 to 1972 as a journeyman running back for five different teams. Roy Simmons was next in 1992 after playing for the Giants and the Redskins as an offensive lineman between 1979 and 1983. He played in the Super Bowl with the Redskins during his final season. Defensive lineman Esera Tuaolo played between 1991 and 1999 for five different teams, including the Super Bowl participant Atlanta Falcons in his final year. He came out in 2002.

Former Green Bay Packer Sterling Sharpe commented shortly afterward in response to the news of his former teammate Tuaolo’s sexuality: “If the guys found out another player was gay on Monday, he wouldn’t be able to play on Sunday.” Those are blunt and unsettling words to say the least about the possible reaction to a gay teammate in the NFL.

To cite another example, in 2007 former NBA player John Amaechi became the first openly gay former NBA player by way of his biography Man in the Middle. In response to this news, former NBA All-Star Tim Hardaway infamously responded that not only would he have distanced himself from any player that was homosexual, but also that he hated gay people and would have attempted to have that player fired from the team. Hardaway’s remarks were not well received. He apologized and has since strived to open his mind and make amends via work with organizations such as The Trevor Project.

To answer the question of what creates this hostile environment, one first need only acknowledge that a major league sports locker room carries with it all the prejudices that are found in normal society. Those prejudices are heightened for a variety of reasons.

There is the hyper-machismo that is deemed inseparable from athletic achievement and superiority in these sports. A different sexual preference is wrongly perceived not to reach the proper standard of masculinity necessary to excel. There also are the cultural stigmas that attach immorality to anything outside of heterosexuality, and those stigmas probably are accentuated by the religiosity that many players espouse.

I cannot help but consider that last particular factor when I think about the organized prayers that one often sees take place after an NFL game. That is not to say that religiosity in itself automatically frowns upon homosexuality, but certainly there is a correlation in religious belief and this discriminatory attitude. Statistical analysis of the voting patterns for Proposition 8 determined that one of the two most significant driving variables after party identification and political ideology was religiosity.

There is much more to motivate the closeted players to keep their secret. These leagues maintain their own unwritten “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” policy similar to the one that has been in use for the past several years by the U.S. military. There is a perception that even if a closeted player were not abused or ostracized by his teammates after coming out, his revelation could be viewed as a betrayal of that code. As the presence of a gay athlete on one of these teams has not been revealed yet, the individual who chooses to be that first pioneer would likely cause an immense publicity distraction for his team. Being the first consequently would take a great amount of courage. Paradoxically, some teammates might even consider it a betrayal that the secret was kept and not immediately told in the first place.

More fundamentally, the financial livelihood of these players is at stake. The fear exists that the mere presence of a gay athlete could invoke such a negative reaction among teammates and fans that said athlete’s job security could be endangered if not destroyed. For professional athletes who on average only have a window of a few years to capitalize on their avocation, that is a critical factor. Considering that, one finds it much easier to sympathize with that player’s impulse to avoid rocking the boat and stay in the closet, regardless of how utterly unjust the construct that demands this status quo is.

One might also take into account the ages of the individuals in these leagues. Many of these young men are in their early to mid-twenties. They still have important formative maturation ahead of them. Throw out all the extra pressures of the most high-profile sports leagues in the world. The rigors of normal society have been known to keep many people closeted well beyond that age range, and as such these guys - whoever they are - deserve a lot of latitude. It is entirely possible that some of these players that have come out after retirement might not have come out much earlier due to any number of personal pressures.

I feel as if I have just given you a preponderance of bad news. There is good news, however.

There are current players who have said that they would have no problem with a gay teammate and would be fully supportive of him. For example, earlier this year an anonymous poll among Major League Baseball players exhibited a full range of reactions to the idea of an openly gay teammate. Players were asked to rate their potential response on a scale of 1 to 10, where 1 represented “no reaction” and 10 represented “apocalyptic.” The average answer was 5.1, and 23 percent of the players polled gave an answer of 3 or less. America might not be quite ready for the long-rumored major studio feature film in development about Major League Baseball players in love, but we are moving in that direction.

Most encouragingly, the other highly correlative variable that drove the Proposition 8 voting results was a simple one: age. The younger you are, the more likely you are to favor LGBT rights. With each passing year, tolerance in this country increases. Prejudices are gradually dying out. It is simply a matter of time before a hotshot athlete grows up in a community where not too many people bothered to hassle him or make him feel insecure about his innate sexual preference. He even might come out before he graduates from high school. He will be a college star, and an NFL team that cannot deny his talent will draft him.

Perhaps the first out active athlete in one of these leagues will not have that story. Perhaps he is in the league right now. Inspired by the current political climate he will decide to make an example of himself, thus risking alienation but in turn inspiring countless others.

Whoever the guy is, added hardships that go beyond the usual physical gauntlet of major league athletics await him. I hope he knows that there are plenty of fans eager to regard him as an equal and see him succeed.

And who are the Los Angeles Rainbow Squirrels? The city of Los Angeles has been without an NFL franchise for several years, and there are rumors that they might soon poach another city’s financially struggling team. If a new mascot is required for that team that will represent a state containing all those wacky “activist judges” that cause conservatives to grouse, I think the Rainbow Squirrels are a fine choice to usher in a new era of tolerance.

C. Robert Dimitri is nothing more than your average American sports fan that has spent far too many hours in front of the television and has absolutely no further credentials. He reserves the right to change any opinions expressed here; unlike the practice of bandwagon sports loyalty, there is virtue in shifting a position when given new information.









Each Time You Like, Share, Tweet or Stumble a Pajiba Post, An Angel Does the Paul Rudd Dance



The 60 Coolest TV Show Title Sequences of All Time Part III | Grading the 7 Most Successful Post-Show Careers of "Deadwood" and "The Wire" Alumni









Comments

I know it wasn't your intent, but I find this all so disheartening. I'm so sick and tired of people being afraid of everything to the point of hatred. And no, it's not like I didn't already know the things pointed out here but when they're presented so matter-of-factly, in conjunction with so many hate-related events in the news...

Within the military, Don't Ask Don't Tell has always been a crock of shit and seemingly devised to comfort civilians more than anyone else. I'd guess things are similar in sports clubs. And why in the hell should anyone have to "come out" anyway? Heteros don't walk around proclaiming themselves.

Posted by: Cindy at October 13, 2010 1:22 PM

On a related note, the closest I ever came to engaging in a cliché barroom fight was a direct result of another patron leading a chant of “Tony Homo” as Tony Romo and my Dallas Cowboys floundered against the New England Patriots.

Godfuckingdamnit, Massholes. Must you continue to be a black eye on our fair region? Fuck it, I'm going to go ahead and assume they were from Rhode Island.

On the other hand, we've got gay marriage. So, you know, there's that.

Posted by: TK at October 13, 2010 1:29 PM

There once was a college in my hometown who's school nickname was the "Fightin' Squirrels". Oddly enough, they too had a prominent gay and lesbian community within, but I think the reason they selected the name was simply because there were hundreds of the little beggars infesting the trees on campus.

Let me tell you something; when a New England winter is fast approaching you do not want to get between a vicious tree rat and his nuts. He will run up your leg and bite you in the junk if you're packing granola bars.

Posted by: bleujayone at October 13, 2010 1:38 PM

And here comes my necessary reference to hockey and/or Chicago sports:

At the 2010 Chicago Pride Parade, Brent Sopel (former Blackhawks defender and part of our 2009-2010 championship team) was up on the Chicago Blackhawks float in his Hawks jersey with his wife, kids, and the Stanley Cup. Naturally that was the point in the parade where I got teary-eyed and started losing my voice.

The Chicago Cubs also had a float in this year's Pride Parade, whose riders included Ernie freaking Banks.

Small steps, and certainly nothing as momentous as an openly gay athlete on a major league team, but any progress is good progress.

Just one more reason I'm INTENSELY proud of my city and our sports teams. Go Hawks!

Posted by: GwenBear at October 13, 2010 1:56 PM

Cindy >> I wouldn't be in favor of forcing anyone to come out. However, I would find it quite admirable were an active player in the NBA, MLB, NFL, or NHL to do so.

The problem here is not that people are or are not coming out. The problem is that this is an environment in which a player not only feels uncomfortable coming out but also feels threatened by the prospect of not keeping his secret and freely expressing his identity. If that pressure did not exist, we could all just get along fine and live and let live.

I did a little bit of research in writing this and only used a small fraction of it. This is one of the better pieces I happened upon about a closeted NHL player. It does a great job of summing up the dismaying current state of affairs...

http://www.outsports.com/entertainment/20050218gumbybookexcerpt.htm

Another memorable story I happened upon involved Tuaolo after his Super Bowl loss. Immediately after the game, he watched his teammates being comforted by their families while his partner had to wait in the shadows. I know how much it means to an athlete to share that culmination of a year's hard work with his loved ones win or lose, and that's just not cool.

Posted by: DarthCorleone at October 13, 2010 1:58 PM

And who are the Los Angeles Rainbow Squirrels?

Sounds like a good name for a predominantly-gay amateur team, actually. (And, funny enough, the National Gay Flag Football League held Gay Bowl X this past weekend, and LA Motion won.)

Posted by: jeem at October 13, 2010 2:01 PM

Interesting thought - say you had a star player in the local NFL team. Makes a boatload of money, sports endorsements, TV ads and even the cover of the next Madden Football game.

Then he comes out.

Given the current atmosphere here in what was once the Great Republic, I would expect his teammates to beat him paralytic, just for a start; then the team cuts him for unspecified reasons and overnight his stock drops faster than Michael Vick's.

Just saying. We still have a VERY long way to go.

Posted by: The Wanderer at October 13, 2010 2:07 PM

Another great article C.Dim. I mostly don't give a hoop about sports beyond enjoying the occasional old episode of NBA Jam, but your writing is very engaging and, as usual, worth a read.

Posted by: replica at October 13, 2010 2:08 PM

Hey bluejayone, you from Staunton, VA, home of the Fighting Squirrels of Mary Baldwin?

Posted by: latvianluck at October 13, 2010 2:17 PM

Seeing as the athletes tend to be the biggest bullies in school this news isn't surprising in the least. Athletes tend to be, excuse the expression, FUCKING MORON ASSHOLES. I have plenty of these meatheads in my family, I know what I'm talking about. Sure, there are exceptions to the rule and there are plenty of intelligent folks that are also quite open and progressive. But the culture that pervades athletics in the US sure doesn't value "openness" as a virtue. And at the high school level you tend to have meathead parents influencing their meathead childtren to continue the cycle of hatred and stupidity.

Some day not too far down the road we are going to look back on this whole thing anti-gay thing we have as a society with the same shame we feel now when faced with the horrific history of slavery in the US or woman's suffrage, or the civil rights movement. It's not time to allow gay marriage. That time was years and years ago. It never should have been a fucking issue in the first place not should it matter to anyone who someone else likes to fuck.

This issue and the intolerance in this country is maddening.

Posted by: TylerDFC at October 13, 2010 2:29 PM

I think this is a really overlooked aspect of queer representation in our culture. Thanks for writing about it.

I do think its more likely that an out-athlete will be drafted than an athlete coming out while playing professionally. There's so. much. money. and nobody with their head on straight is going to fuck with that. Plus, if the athlete is already out when he's drafted, there's no backlash for keeping it a secret.

Posted by: Abby-Wan Kenobi at October 13, 2010 2:50 PM

Wait, WHAT? Some football players are GAY? Nooooooo! What is next, Women's Tennis?

Posted by: Lindsey with an 'e' at October 13, 2010 2:52 PM

Further Reading: "Take Me Out", a play by Richard Greenberg. An analog to Derek Jeter, a biracial enormously successful baseball player comes out. Madness ensues. Perhaps the finest written play I've ever been a part of.

Posted by: Ian at October 13, 2010 2:54 PM

Ranking the 4 major sports about their tolerance for having a gay teammate, and the inherent pros and cons attached to their respective leagues (10 = Maybe I'll ask him out///1 = KILL THE QUEER!!!):

NHL: 7.5 (PROS: Canadians and Western Europeans are more open-minded; all players' subconscious understanding that their sport's high amount of physical contact is easily offset by the inability to get a boner on a giant slab of ice with so many blades flying around / CONS: uncontrollable drunken anger of Russians and Germans skew the results downward)

MLB: 7 (PROS: Little to no physical contact during the game; long season that forces teammates to be extra tolerant of each other; number of practical jokes involving each other's genitalia already makes them comfortable with homoeroticism; a subconscious desire to be uber-progressive in an ultra-conservative, old-boy-network league / CONS: Baseball players are the dumbest athletes and prone to irrational prejudices; too many players on each team means a higher likelyhood of one jerk-off who absolutely will not accept a gay teammate no matter what and will never shut the fuck up about it)

NBA: 4 (PROS: Less teammates increases the likelihood that all of them will come around; players get laid so much that a gay teammate won't threaten their sexuality one bit / CONS: High amount of sweaty physical contact while wearing shorts and a jersey will freak out some homophobic players; residual prejudices from Magic Johnson HIV announcement; booty-obsessed black men will be confused by preference for flat hairy asses)

NFL: 1.5 (PROS: . . . nope, can't think of any / CONS: Extreme levels of physical contact and uncontrolled aggression; NFL players consider themselves the Alpha Dogs of the sports world and immune to "catching the gay"; Brain damage from too many hits reduces likelihood of rational, critical thinking essential to banishing deeply rooted prejudices; "Pack" mentality of NFL locker rooms encourages violent retribution for straying from the "pack")

Posted by: Kballs at October 13, 2010 3:29 PM

I didn't mean to imply that you thought people should have to come out - and I understand your point about the statement it would make. The thing is, if sports teams are like the military, the gays are already out (to each other). It's this public declaration that seems to be necessary in order to make things acceptable - but to whom? Speaking from my experience, the in/out thing is all a "game" that people are playing. Should they be forced to pretend to hide so the general public won't have to face the fact that there are gays? Of course not. At the same time, peoples' personal lives shouldn't have to be paraded to make a point to people who never want to face up to that point regardless. I don't know if I sound like I'm running in circles here; I sort of feel like I am. It's a catch-22 I suppose.

Off to read your link.

Posted by: Cindy at October 13, 2010 3:31 PM

That link isn't going direct for me and I can't get it in a search of that site either.

Posted by: Cindy at October 13, 2010 3:33 PM

Weird. Try this one. Somebody copied and pasted it there...

http://www.forumice.com/showthread.php?t=21650

Posted by: C. Robert Dimitri at October 13, 2010 3:44 PM

Cindy >> Yeah, I understand your point. My stance is simply this: a player should be able to publicly couple with whomever he chooses and not have to worry about concealing it, much less the potential extreme reaction that The Wanderer describes. In that respect, I think we agree.

I acknowledge there is a long way to go, but perhaps it's not as far as we perceive. This prejudice is borne of ignorance, which is not irreversible, as Tim Hardaway appears to have demonstrated. Ideally these qualms about exposure in the locker room or the showers or any discomfort with the necessary physical contact on the field of play can be remedied with simple professionalism. Statistically speaking we know closeted players are already participating, and whatever a homophobic player might irrationally fear would happen has not occurred, so what difference does the knowledge of their presence truly make?

Kballs >> That's quite an analysis.

Posted by: C. Robert Dimitri at October 13, 2010 4:07 PM

"Athletes tend to be, excuse the expression, FUCKING MORON ASSHOLES."

Not swimmers. Not cross-country runners. Not rowers. Not professional tennis players. Seems to me it's the All-American-type sports where homophobia persists. We have something invested in traditional douchebaggery when it comes to men's baseball/hockey/football/basketball. I am honestly astonished that in 2010 many people still think there's no place for a female sportscaster in men's locker rooms (unless they're open to being harassed and flashed by dudes). I don't know when we permitted any and all conduct by male athletes in certain sports to be sacrosant, but somewhere along the way these assholes got the idea that they could act however they wanted and that everybody else would fall in line.

Posted by: samantha t at October 13, 2010 4:51 PM

All the gays are in greco/roman wrestling. Think about guys rubbing against each other in spandex. Being homophobic would be a handicap what with all the accidental erections and such.

Posted by: nemo at October 13, 2010 6:29 PM

Thank you all for making me realize I should hate myself for playing football. It's cool though because I know y'all would never engage in stupid, unfounded stereotypes. Now if you'll excuse me, I'm going to go live up to some stereotypes and do a little gay, sorry, fag bashing and hit the gym. Maybe if I have the time, I'll rape a toddler and set fire to a convent on my way home.

Posted by: Tracer Bullet at October 13, 2010 7:26 PM

a player should be able to publicly couple with whomever he chooses and not have to worry about concealing it, much less the potential extreme reaction that The Wanderer describes.


I'd be careful with statements like that because, in that case, Tiger may want his endorsements back.

Posted by: admin at October 13, 2010 8:01 PM

We definitely agree on your stance.

At this point in time, I can't write most of the prejudice off with the ignorance pen. Irrational fear, religious doctrine, a hatred of anything foreign to one's own world... That was a terribly sad read and it's horrifying to me that Aaron has had to go to such measures to pretend to be straight.

Posted by: Cindy at October 13, 2010 8:11 PM

Just so we're not all offending each other or being sad about prejudice, here's a little something to lighten the mood...

George Takei's response to Tim Hardaway's comments:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4s1iQODC5OI

Posted by: DarthCorleone at October 13, 2010 10:58 PM

If anyone is coming out while mid-career, the only viable way I see that happening is one of the premiere players, say a QB, who has either been to or won a Superbowl, and financially a team would lose more by cutting their star player than just accepting the dude as gay. Basically, statiscally, financially, popular...ly stable, and maybe acceptance could be forced.

Posted by: e at October 14, 2010 1:23 AM

"Thank you all for making me realize I should hate myself for playing football. It's cool though because I know y'all would never engage in stupid, unfounded stereotypes. Now if you'll excuse me, I'm going to go live up to some stereotypes and do a little gay, sorry, fag bashing and hit the gym. Maybe if I have the time, I'll rape a toddler and set fire to a convent on my way home.

Who do you think said that every footballer is a homophobic jerk?

It's clear that the atmosphere across professional football is homophobic and assholish. Otherwise someone would have come out. That is not in question here. But neither is it an accusation that you must be a jerk because you also play football.

Tyler DFC also says that "athletes tend to be the biggest bullies in school" Does that match your experience?
Either way, a 'tendency' to be the biggest bullies, whether or not that was the case where you went to school, does not mean that if you play football you are a jerk and should be ashamed of yourself. It just means there are problems in the culture of Football. Which there are. Don't take it personally.

Posted by: Ender at October 14, 2010 5:14 AM

@Darth, yeah that video is one of the greatest things I've ever seen. You've got to give Sulu some props for that.

Posted by: Ender at October 14, 2010 5:16 AM

Yeah, because homophobia is a problem unique to football. Sometimes I turn on an NBA game and think I've come across a re-run of A Chorus Line. Earlier this year, I kept trying to figure out why ESPN was broadcasting a pride parade before realizing I was watching the World Cup.

Posted by: Tracer Bullet at October 14, 2010 6:34 AM

Here are a few other baby steps...

Scott Fujita supports gay marriage. It may have gotten him traded to the Browns. (just kidding, I don't know why the Saints traded him) http://www.advocate.com/Sports/New_Orleans_Saints_Linebacker_Scott_Fujita_Talks_Gay_Rights/

LZ Granderson is an out former athlete who writes for ESPN

John Randle (I believe that is his name) mentioned loved ones and partners in his Hall of Fame induction speech. He didn't come out and I don't know that he was intending to

Posted by: anikitty at October 14, 2010 1:00 PM

e:If anyone is coming out while mid-career, the only viable way I see that happening is one of the premiere players, say a QB, who has either been to or won a Superbowl, and financially a team would lose more by cutting their star player than just accepting the dude as gay. Basically, statiscally, financially, popular...ly stable, and maybe acceptance could be forced.

If rumors are true (and I've heard from pretty reliable sources) there's been a Super Bowl-winning (and losing) gay QB in the recent past. Chances of him coming out are very slim though.

Too bad, because it would chap the hide of my somewhat homophobic brother-in-law so bad that he'd be raw for months.

Posted by: Drake at October 14, 2010 4:22 PM