free counter with statistics Pajiba's Oscar Winner Wish List | Scathing Reviews for Bitchy People

no-country-for-old-men-wallpaper-2-1024.preview.jpg

Pajiba’s Oscar-Winner Wish List

Half-Assed Oscar Coverage / The Pajiba Staff

Miscellaneous | February 22, 2008 | Comments (82)


We’re not gonna beat you about the head and face with a lot of pre-Oscar coverage (we’re not really that site), but we will bring you our annual post-Oscar rundown on Monday. In the meantime, for shits and giggles, here’s the staff’s collective, commentary-free wish list of winners for Sunday’s ceremony. Who we want to win is in bold, not who we think will win, a distinction that the TV Whore insisted be made. Where the Academy ultimately disagrees with us is probably where our Monday-morning bitch session will focus.

And, if y’all don’t want to talk about the Oscars until the afternoon’s reviews arrive, who thinks McCain nipped some young booty?

Major awards only:

Lead Actor
George Clooney in Michael Clayton
Daniel Day-Lewis in There Will Be Blood
Johnny Depp in Sweeney Todd The Demon Barber of Fleet Street
Tommy Lee Jones in In the Valley of Elah
Viggo Mortensen in Eastern Promises

Supporting Actor
Casey Affleck in The Assassination of Jesse James by the Coward Robert Ford
Javier Bardem in No Country for Old Men
Philip Seymour Hoffman in Charlie Wilson’s War
Hal Holbrook in Into the Wild
Tom Wilkinson in Michael Clayton

Lead Actress
Cate Blanchett in Elizabeth: The Golden Age
Julie Christie in Away from Her
Marion Cotillard in La Vie en Rose
Laura Linney in The Savages
Ellen Page in Juno

Supporting Actress
Cate Blanchett in I’m Not There
Ruby Dee in American Gangster
Saoirse Ronan in Atonement
Amy Ryan in Gone Baby Gone (tie)
Tilda Swinton in Michael Clayton (tie)

Best Director
The Diving Bell and the Butterfly, Julian Schnabel
Juno, Jason Reitman
Michael Clayton, Tony Gilroy
No Country for Old Men, Joel Coen and Ethan Coen
There Will Be Blood, Paul Thomas Anderson

Adapted Screenplay
Atonement, by Christopher Hampton
Away from Her, by Sarah Polley
The Diving Bell and the Butterfly, by Ronald Harwood
No Country for Old Men, by Joel Coen & Ethan Coen
There Will Be Blood, by Paul Thomas Anderson

Original Screenplay
Juno, by Diablo Cody (tie)
Lars and the Real Girl, by Nancy Oliver
Michael Clayton, by Tony Gilroy
Ratatouille, by Brad Bird (tie)
The Savages, by Tamara Jenkins

Best Motion Picture of the Year
Atonement
Juno
Michael Clayton
No Country for Old Men
There Will Be Blood









Roman Holiday | Pajiba Love 02/22/08


Comments

This appears to be that rare Oscar year where, with a few exceptions, it will be hard to be too disappointed no matter who wins. It's very exciting!

Posted by: Mimi at February 22, 2008 11:07 AM

Ratatouille? Really? I wasn't impressed with it. Even my kids thought it was mediocre. Did I miss something?

Posted by: wsapnin at February 22, 2008 11:17 AM

No love for Julian Schnabel? I thought his depiction of locked-in syndrome was masterfully done.
My favorite movie of the year by far.

Posted by: yogh at February 22, 2008 11:27 AM

An Oscar for Sarah Polley please!!!!

Posted by: boo at February 22, 2008 11:27 AM

It's a RAT that COOKS! in a FRENCH RESTAURANT! in PARIS! What's there not to love? It's a story that teaches all young rats to dream and never give up...even in the face of extermination. I liked it.

Is it wrong that I don't give a flying fuck about the Oscars? I think they're tedious and pointless.

Posted by: joker at February 22, 2008 11:28 AM

errr, that should read direction not depiction of locked in syndrome. my bad.

Posted by: yogh at February 22, 2008 11:29 AM

ratatouille kind of blew. i thought it was dull and repetitive.

Posted by: jr at February 22, 2008 11:36 AM

Calling a win for Javier Bardem is like predicting the rising of the sun.

Definitely want to see the Coen Brothers win this year, otherwise I fear they may go down the same road as Scorsese.

Posted by: chenry at February 22, 2008 11:38 AM

Man, that Best Director category is fantastic!

Do you think Julian Schnabel will show up in formal pajamas? I think he should dress like a 50's Hefner. Because he can.

Posted by: Amanda47 at February 22, 2008 11:39 AM

Can someone explain the shared credit of the Coen brothers to me? I thought I remember Tarantino being in trouble with the Director's Guild over "guest directing" a segment of Four Rooms, and that that DQ'd him from future Oscar consideration.

1) Is that true? Or am I making this up?

2) How do the Coen Brothers get around this, then?

Posted by: Bullfrog at February 22, 2008 11:46 AM

I kind of think that best original screenplay should go to Lars and the Real Girl, but what do I know? I also WANT Amy Ryan to win, but we all know that Cate Blanchett has that one in the bag.

On a side note, no, I don't think McCain hit it. Wouldn't surprise me if it's a half-baked landmine dreamt up by the Christian conservatives who still think Huckabee has a shot.

Posted by: Nicole at February 22, 2008 11:50 AM

I loved No Country for Old Men, but it didn't effect me as strongly as There Will Be Blood. I would really like to see TWBB win best picture, but like Mimi said, this year there are so many deserving films that it should be satisfying no matter what.


I haven't cared about the oscars at all in a long time, it all starts to seem pretty pointless with awards going to American Idol contestants, but this year I'm actually excited again. I've actually seen and appreciated the majority of the nominated films.

Posted by: Recovering Navel Gazer at February 22, 2008 11:55 AM

Yep. It's a very good year. I'm a bit disappointed that Gordon Pinsett got no love for Away From Her, as I think he actually pulled off the much more difficult role opposite Julie Christie.
I know it's a crowded field, but sure PSH could gracefully retire from this sort of thing now.

As for Ratatouille, I loved it - epecially after an underwhelming Cars.

Trying not to think about McCain with his trousers round his ankles...

Posted by: Simon B at February 22, 2008 11:55 AM

i hated juno. i thought it was obnoxiously pithy. and think diablo cody is obnoxiously pithy. and i think that every actress and film and screenplay nominated is better than juno in every fucking category.

Posted by: breonne at February 22, 2008 11:59 AM

Man, I just do not care about the Oscars this year. I don't remember caring last year either. I haven't seen one Best Picture nomination, and I'm guessing most of America feels the same way given the box office on some of these movies. I have nothing against them, and I really want to see There Will Be Blood, but I'm waiting for Netflix at this point. Trekking to the theater is just too much of an overpriced hassle lately. The whole Oscar race this year seems like a desperate hype job to get anyone to care. Even more than usual.

Posted by: Rob at February 22, 2008 12:02 PM

I'm glad that Independent films have been the ones that were recognized this year! I'm still bummed that Waitress got nothing while Norbit got one.

Posted by: Kamakaze Feminist at February 22, 2008 12:11 PM

I think it's high time the very-deserving Laura Linney got some love, but god only knows what formula they use to actually issue the award. It seems a lot of the time talent has absolutely nothing to do with it.

Posted by: llism at February 22, 2008 12:13 PM

oohh, breone. Have we touched a nerve sweetie?

btw--I don't give a shit if McCain "hit it" as much as I didn't care about Big Billy takin' a hummer under the table. It's irrelevant to their ability to lead the country. It just speaks of their hunger for power and ability to manipulate.

Posted by: wsapnin at February 22, 2008 12:17 PM

I'll be happy all Monday as long as Bardem wins Best Supporting Actor. I can't remember ever having been that unnerved by a character. "Call it." Shudder.

Posted by: Julie at February 22, 2008 12:19 PM

It just speaks of their hunger for power and ability to manipulate.

Eh, I just think it speaks of guys' perpetual drive for poonani, and how some make poor choices and let their johnsons do the thinking. (Hell, I think most all of us have made poor choices when good sex is involved in the equation :-).

Posted by: llism at February 22, 2008 12:27 PM

+1 to Llism for the use of poonani. Love it.

Posted by: Julie at February 22, 2008 12:33 PM

Marion Cotillard for Best Actress!

If it were up to me, There Will Be Blood would just win everything. And I'm still pissed Paul Dano didn't get nominated for Best Supporting Actor.

Posted by: Stephanie at February 22, 2008 12:46 PM

I really liked Ratatoulle, for many little reasons. The importance of washing your hands before touching food. The way the doofus cook finally told the truth about the rat helping him. And that great food is really a trancendent experience!

I watched Shrek the Third after Ratatoulle. Then I swore I would NEVER follow a Pixar movie with a Dreamworks film. Too disappointing.

Posted by: numchuck at February 22, 2008 12:47 PM

Any Pajibans know where a guy without Sky might be able to watch the festivities in London?

Posted by: WestCoastPat at February 22, 2008 12:48 PM

Rob, you're not the only one. I could care less about them this year. I believe that the movies are great, but I just can't muster up the energy to tune in besides to see who's wearing what.

Posted by: Brie at February 22, 2008 12:48 PM

I love the screenplay for No Country, but it's not really "adapted" too much at all, meaning no real modification. They just cut and pasted from the book, which still delivers an amazing film. I loved the movie, but they should win for directing and get no mention for the script. It's verbatim.

Posted by: matt at February 22, 2008 12:49 PM

Thank you for liking Ratatouille.
I find it hard to believe that No Country was THAT bloody good!

Posted by: Ling at February 22, 2008 12:53 PM

Ellen Page for Juno? Really?

Not saying it's a bad performance, BY ANY MEANS, but are we willing to put her into a category that contains the likes of Meryl Streep, the Hepburns, Judi Dench, etc?

She's a quirky, young girl. She played a quirky, young girl.

A lot of people will probably disagree with me in this category, but I felt the need to represent the 2% of the population who just might agree.

I'll take the heat on this one, other non-believers. You guys sit back and watch the Oscars.

Posted by: nancy at February 22, 2008 1:17 PM

I hated Juno too. I have no idea what possessed them to nominate that movie for anything other than trying to look cool. But god help me, if Diablo Cody wins Best Screenplay my head will probably explode.

Other than that, I LOVE No Country for Old Men, hope it wins a lot, and I just saw Gone Baby Gone last night and Amy Ryan is quite good.

Posted by: lola o at February 22, 2008 1:29 PM

All I care about as far as the Oscars go is to watch my precious, Jon Stewart, and to see what wack-a-doo items appear on the red carpet.

Blanchett will be there this year, so that is one insane yet looks good outfit.

Posted by: Melody at February 22, 2008 1:31 PM

How am I gonna celebrate on Sunday? Easy. I'm getting shitfaced and screaming at the screen just like my mom used to do before they came and took her away...

In the event Bardem doesn't walk away with the Oscar, d'you think he's gonna be packing that captive bolt-gun of his for the after parties?

Posted by: Skittimus Maximus at February 22, 2008 1:43 PM

Ellen Page for Juno? Really?

Not saying it's a bad performance, BY ANY MEANS, but are we willing to put her into a category that contains the likes of Meryl Streep, the Hepburns, Judi Dench, etc?

She's a quirky, young girl. She played a quirky, young girl." -- nancy

Coming out of lurkdom to totally agree with nancy.

And another vote for Marion Cotillard in La Vie en Rose.

Posted by: cerwen at February 22, 2008 1:45 PM

And perhaps I should stay in lurkdom until I learn to check my html tags before clicking Post Comment. :(

Posted by: cerwen at February 22, 2008 1:46 PM

I'm actually gonna care about the Oscars this year than in most years previous just because I actually saw most of the movies that are nominated. The forecast on this site isn't that different from most others. I agree with most of the categories except I never saw Juno or any of the animated films. My only pick that seems to be in doubt is Amy Ryan for Gone Baby Gone which she should win. That flick didn't get the exposure it deserved.

Posted by: vadmspartan at February 22, 2008 1:48 PM

i liked juno. it was a cute movie, but i don't understand how it got nominated for best picture. i think that zodiac was overlooked.

Posted by: kelley at February 22, 2008 1:49 PM

I really enjoyed Juno. It reminded me of Saved a bit - the kids actually looked like kids.

BUT. . . I didn't particularly like No Country for Old Men. Javier Bardem was unnerving, kind of, but mostly he just struck me as a caricature of someone who is cold. Maybe it would have been worse if someone else had performed in that role, so perhaps he should get recognized for not totally turning it into crap? And I thought Tommy Lee Jones's character was unnecessary, which maybe was the point (that's so meta), but I couldn't care less about him in this film.

Daniel Day-Lewis strikes me as a one-trick pony. It's a very good trick, but it's the same over-intensity in every role (that I'm aware of), with a different accent. Look, he's intense and Irish! Now he's intense and Italian! Now he's intense and Southern!

I'm still peeved that The Diving Bell didn't get best picture nomination - I thought it was loads better than No Country and Michael Clayton at least.

Posted by: Lollygagger at February 22, 2008 1:51 PM

Loved Juno, and I want hometown girl Ellen to take best actress (though with that competition, I don't imagine that it'll happen). However, I do not think the screenplay was among the strongest points of the movie. Haven't seen any of the others in the category aside from Ratatouille, so I won't venture an opinion on who should take it.

Also, I'm with boo--it'd be lovely to see Sarah Polley take the adapted screenplay Oscar. Talk about wisdom beyond your years, that girl is amazing.

By the way, nice to see some love for Gordon Pinsent from Simon B, if not the academy! I only recently found out that he lost his real-life wife last year, which must have made the role that much more emotional for him.

Posted by: MO at February 22, 2008 1:51 PM

I don't care about the Oscars. I will probably have them on as background, and to see the fashions. Nah, I don't even have to do that. I can wait til Monday morning and check out Go Fug Yourself to see the fashion disasters.

And I also don't care if McCain hit it.

Wow, I'm feeling apathetic this morning. Oh well.

Posted by: rlr260 at February 22, 2008 1:52 PM

Oh . . . and I fell asleep in Ratatouille.

(I'm banished from this site now, aren't I?)

Posted by: Lollygagger at February 22, 2008 1:52 PM

rlr260, I hear you. Why sit through all the crappy speeches and filler material just to catch a glimpse of the hideosity when you can just catch the highlights (lowlights?) online the following day?

Posted by: MO at February 22, 2008 1:58 PM

I have seen No Country for Old Men a ridiculous (to others, not to me) amount of times just from friends telling me they have yet to see it, and me dragging their asses into the theater. Not one has regretted the experience. The Coens deserve a sweep.

Posted by: Jas at February 22, 2008 2:00 PM

i think that zodiac was overlooked.

kelley, god yes! That was a fantastic movie, with outstanding performances all the way around.

Posted by: llism at February 22, 2008 2:02 PM

Re: Nancy

If Ellen Page were to win, which she won't as Christie has it wrapped, she would be far more deserving than many of the actresses who have taken the award home lately - Hilary Swank (for Million Dollar Baby - what a joke), Gwyneth Paltrow (give me a fucking break), Helen Hunt (where are you now, Helen?), Cher (are you fucking kidding me?), and Julia fucking Roberts (same performance, different movie - one of the all-time Oscar tragedies in my mind was Burstyn losing to his twathead). I think Page deserves one far more than any in the list above. Her performance is one that may actually be talked about in 20 years, if for nothing more than the quirkiness, whereas those above likely won't.

Aside from that, No Country should sweep except for sound mixing. The movie was hot. There Will Be Blood was wonderful as well, but it wasn't as fine-tuned as No Country. TWBB's scope was a bit bigger than No Country and in the long run, I think that hurts its chances. It's every bit as good as No Country. I mean, do Tom Cruise and the most of the other dildoes (how does one pluralize dildo?) that vote for these awards really sit through something like TWBB? I doubt it. If they did then Scorsese wouldn't have had to wait 35 years to get his while strokes and hacks like Mel Gibson, Kevin Costner (seriously, COSTNER???) and Ron Howard pulled down directing Oscars.

Let me note, in the grand scheme of things, these awards mean nothing. I just wished those who deserved the awards would get them (all my opinion, of course). That means Russell Crowe, Ron Howard, Jennifer Hudson, those mentioned above, et al., GIVE 'EM BACK!!!

Posted by: Harmonov at February 22, 2008 2:03 PM

Supporting actor is where I am most conflicted, I thought both Casey Affleck and Javier Bardem were brilliant. I'd have to give the slight edge to Casey. I agree with the Sarah Polley love, and it's not JUST because we're both Canadian.....

Posted by: Chris at February 22, 2008 2:05 PM

I'll be watching for the dresses, Jon Stewart, and the montages. Yes, I like the montages. Wait, is montages even a word? Why is it starting to look so strange to me? Montages. Mon. Ta. Ges.

Posted by: Kolby at February 22, 2008 2:07 PM

I'm still annoyed that The Brolin wasn't nominated.

Posted by: Lannie at February 22, 2008 2:09 PM

*quietly watching Kolby talk about montages*

Posted by: twig at February 22, 2008 2:09 PM

The Oscars are great; it's one of the only times of the year (aside from the Super Bowl) where one can easily get a seat at an otherwise packed restaurant here in LA. See you at the Apple Pan, folks.

Posted by: ohgrl at February 22, 2008 2:10 PM

No one ever talks about the "No Country" shotgun. Such an unusual, quiet sound with such a big result. Very good movie but I needed a shower and some comfort food after. Not as lifesucking as "Happiness" but I don't want to revisit it quickly, plus I don't know how the quiiiiiiet, slow pace plays on reviewing (though it sure works the firt time). Oh and fuckin Roger Deakins is the MAN.

I like "The Incredibles" much more than "Rataouille", but that moment of sparked memory towards the end, done with no dialogue, was.....MASTERFULLY effective. I wanted to spray tears when I thought about it later. "Juno" promotion and reviews went all out upon its LANY opening, weeks ahead of any kind of wide distribution. By the time it got here and shouted "I'm Yours!" I was like Eddie Murphy denied crackers for too long. Not that it's fair, but yeah, I'd had enough already. And just looking at Daniel Day Lewis made me weary. "Oh hell, he's gonna work the moustache and commence ta jigglin HOO HA isn't he?" Again, just a gut reaction, but I had no desire. A friend raved about it, but she'd already stung with me "No Country" and I backed off. "Yeah but you didn't say this 'great movie' was a dementor!!" Shoulda known better after "The Departed". Very good movie, but I was quoting Crow T. Robot by the end. "Talk about nihilism!" It'd be fun for me to see Johnny win, but I don't know that he should.

Oh and I saw Julie and one or two others lamenting a good dvd release guide. I've been watching this site lately:
http://www.joblo.com/dvdclinic/release_dates.php

Hope it helps!

Posted by: Jay at February 22, 2008 2:16 PM

Lollygagger (great name by the way), I've been having a Daniel Day-Lewis film festival for one courtesy of Netflix this past month, and I'd say you should take a look at the rest of his work.

This is no one trick pony. He played two occaisionally loud, murderous, mustachioed men in a row and a lot of people have confused this for a lack of range. These two characters upon examination bare little resemblence to one another and no resemblence at all to the other characters in his body of work.

Posted by: Recovering Navel Gazer at February 22, 2008 2:19 PM

"First thing I'm gonna do is buy me a montage! Yeah!"

Does that mean twig is judging? Whatever, I love em too. Just love 'em. "Yeah! That WAS cool! That WAS stirring!" What can I say? Cheap thrills! It's a long held wish that just once they'd play "People Who Died" over the memorial. And it wouldn't even be disrespectful!

Posted by: Jay at February 22, 2008 2:23 PM

Judging? No, just reminded of a bit from Cable & Deadpool where Deadpool starts talking about how much he likes the word enchilada.

Enchilada. Enchilada. Enchilada.

Posted by: twig at February 22, 2008 2:31 PM

Ooh, Jay, you rock my ass.

*bookmarks it

Posted by: Julie at February 22, 2008 2:37 PM

I haven't seen Ratatouille, but every time it's mentioned I think of this kid I know whose actual name is Brad, but I call him Frodo because he is short and has foofy hair. He was in culinary school when Ratatouille came out, so he naturally became Bradatouille.

Also, regarding montages and enchilada, seriously, any word starts to look weird as hell if you look at it long enough. It's just worse when you type words you don't use very often.

Posted by: Sarina at February 22, 2008 2:38 PM

Lannie, me, too. Robbed.

Posted by: samantha t at February 22, 2008 2:39 PM

What, no picks for Best Editing or Best Sound Mixing? You guys are sooooo snooty.

Marion Cotillard in La Vie en Rose FTW!!!!!!

Posted by: Daisy at February 22, 2008 2:45 PM

FYI, to anyone who was curious after the directing/casting/script announcements of "Where the Wild Things Are" - there's early buzz that the entire thing will be reshot, possibly losing the director and script because - surprise, surprise - it was stranger and more subversive than the execs were expecting.

As if there is any possible way it could be more horrific than Cat in the Hat.

Posted by: twig at February 22, 2008 2:57 PM

Since I bet on the wrong horse all year long, I've barely seen the nominated films. Is it fair to say I want Laura Linney to win when the only nominees I've seen (entirely) are Cate Blanchett and Ellen Page? I doubt it.

I like the predictions, though I still think Michael Clayton might take the big prize. It's serious without being British or about lots of people dying. Honest to blog, Juno might be a bit too...precious? trendy? filled with clunky hipster dialogue that only works because of the brilliant casting? to actually win. And that's coming from a Juno fan.

Posted by: Robert at February 22, 2008 3:16 PM

Needs more Schnabel love. I assume the lack of it is due to the fact that a large part of the staff might not have seen The Diving Bell and the Butterfly yet.

Posted by: Kevin Longrie at February 22, 2008 3:22 PM

The screenplay was the worst part of Juno. And as for Ellen Page, she was playing someone so much like herself that it's hard to tell whether she was doing a very good job at all, Which is why the oscar usually goes to those who are playing roles that are more of a stretch.

Posted by: Meredith at February 22, 2008 3:38 PM

Meredith - you're right. If Ellen Page had gained/lost 30 pounds and the "Juno" character had been mentally disabled she would be a lock.

Posted by: Chris at February 22, 2008 4:24 PM

Thanks for the link, Jay!

For me, I've disagreed with the Oscar choices so much over the years, I've ceased to really care about who wins. It is nice to see movies I enjoy and people whose work I respect get a little recognition via the nomination nod, though.

Incidentally, I too am a sucker for a good montage. I'm not ashamed.

McCain, sex...McCain, sex...I'm sorry, I can't think about it. The imagery's just too much for me.

Posted by: ShinyKate at February 22, 2008 4:49 PM

Samantha T,
I am convinced you're my long-lost twin sister as, too frequently to be a coinky dink, your thoughts parallel mine. Although I think we might have different fathers being that I'm of the black persuasion and I get the sense you're.....not. Rather illogical, but work with me.

Anyhoo, we must part ways on the Brolin love. I wasn't particularly impressed with his NCFOM performance. Actually, I think Garrett Dillahunt did a lot more with his itty-bitty role than Josh did with his leading role. And in general, I'm not a fan of Brolin's work. He's "middle of the road"ish, although I guess that's better than "off the road"ish. Or "dive off the cliff to your destruction"ish.

Also, I'm totally a "catch the Oscar highlights on MSN and Youtube the next morning" kind of girl. Saves me lots of time.

Posted by: Daphne at February 22, 2008 6:07 PM

*wipes tears from cheeks*

I thought I was the only person in Christendom who loved the montages. My favorite: the dearly departed. It never fails to choke me up.

Ratatouille, however, did not. I wouldn't have even seen it but for the Pajiba raves. I was sorely disappointed. Sorely disappointed.

Posted by: Jimbob at February 22, 2008 6:23 PM

@ Rob,

You and I are of one mind. Whatever, right?

But here's where I have to depart from sanity. I hate, hate HATE (as I'm sure most of you do) the placid entitlement of these awards shows, and would probably pull a Mark Rothko before watching one willfully.

'Hey, remember that time when 'the pictures' saved all of the world's babies from all of the world's wells, while teaching us to hope and laugh at the same time?'

Fuck me, there's less wankery in a bukkake session!

Actually, I confess, I have no business being on a site like this, because when push comes to shove, I don't give two damp shits about movies or TV, and I never go to the theatre. There are shows I watch and LOVE, don't get me wrong. But this whole writer's strike thing? The shows were all gone, and I unexpectedly didn't miss one.

That's not to say I'm one of those self-righteous 'I don't watch television, and I didn't know that the Berlin Wall came down until 1996, because I was too busy admiring the swirl in a sunflower, and being struck by the BEAUTY of it all...which is to say I'm better than you' people. I'd actually like to hurt those people. T.V. is fun (when it's not terrible), but I can't give it any more energy than that. Films? I wish I could do more about this one. I'm sorry, I didn't give a flying fuck either way when the writer's thing...thinged. I'll say it again, I'm sorry.

I could say it's because I'm impovrished, live is the boonies (oh, yeah, Toronto has boonies and they're HERE), but I don't think I could really be bothered with going to the theatre if the situation were different. I know, like, QUELLE DOMMAGE, right? It's okay, rip on me if you like, everyone does. I understand that I'm the crazy person here. Oh, if you only knew.

But danged if I don't love this site, which says something. If you can get a terminally boring old cow like myself to care, you're doing the Lord's work.

Posted by: Jo 'Mama' Besser at February 22, 2008 6:58 PM

QUELLE DOMMAGE ???

Don't you mean... like... QUEL DOMMAGE?

Posted by: amanda at February 22, 2008 8:16 PM

completely off-topic but, has anyone heard anything more about Redbelt, the David Mamet film? It was mentioned in the trade round-up sometime last year. i just saw a trailer for it and it actually looks like it might be decent.

Posted by: causaubon at February 22, 2008 8:20 PM

No Country For Old Men? More like Gay Country For Gay Men. AMIRITE?!?!

Posted by: Sordid Gangbang at February 23, 2008 12:27 AM

Am i the only person who didnt think Brad Pitt deserved at the very least an oscar nod for "The Assassination of Jesse James by the Coward Robert Ford"? I am an avid movie watcher, as well as a writer, and aside from Daniel Day Lewis, cannot remember a performance which has been more invigorating to experience. Brad Pitt has always provided amazing performances, but it is "The Assassination..." that really solidified in my mind that he is a premier performer. I was impressed by George Clooney's performance, and "Eastern Promises" was one of my favorite movies of the year because of Viggo Mortensen's portrayal...but only Javier Bardem came close to mastering the same sort of ownership that Brad Pitt brough to the screen in each and every scene. I am looking forward to the oscars, moreso than ever before...but for me, the nominations will forever feel tainted for the snub that Brad Pitt has recieved.

Halle Berry's performance in "Things We Lost in the Fire" is another object of contention.

Posted by: Aaron at February 23, 2008 1:26 AM

I like that there is a tie. Oscars should totally have ties. Then both candidates could mount the stage and deliver their speeches at the same time.

Yep the Oscars need a bit more physical competition.

Posted by: Gigi at February 23, 2008 1:33 AM

Ratatouille was THE shit. Great physical comedy and charming as hell. That movie was all heart and you could tell how much time the creators put into it.

GOD, I love Pixar. WALL-E looks amazing as well.


"No Country For Old Men? More like Gay Country For Gay Men. AMIRITE?!?!"

I like your style. But you are wrong.

Posted by: Mick J at February 23, 2008 4:08 AM

C'mon! An Oscar for Sarah Polley!!

Posted by: KatyBelle at February 23, 2008 1:50 PM

wow. i don't agree with any of these whatsoever. weird that.

Posted by: amanda at February 23, 2008 2:33 PM

Just want to say that this lonely Pajiba staffer voted for Laura Linney. I thought Page was totally charming, but I agree that the screenplay didn't do her any favors through the first half of the movie.

Also, given that the clips I've seen of There Will Be Blood make it seem like Day-Lewis doesn't just chew the scenery but inhales it whole and then vomits it back up over the rest of the cast, I voted for Clooney. If it's possible for a Best Picture nominee to be underrated, I think Michael Clayton is.

Posted by: JMW at February 23, 2008 3:14 PM

Aaron: I agree with your love for Brad Pitt in "Assassination of Jesse James", and I actually feel that the film was robbed of a Best Picture nomination. I thought Michael Clayton was a good film, but not outstanding, so I'm not sure why it's in the running. In addition to my belief that Josh Brolin should have earned a Best Actor nod, I think Ryan Gosling deserves one for "Lars and the Real Girl". In the hands of a less capable actor, that movie would have been pathetic or offensive, but he was so earnest as Lars, he made the whole movie work. Love!

Posted by: Lannie at February 23, 2008 3:40 PM

What about foreign films? In my humble opinon, the Counterfeiters is amazing, but Beaufort should win...

Posted by: Lahav at February 24, 2008 6:03 AM

Hee -- all the "montage" and "enchilada" talk puts me in mind of the great Calvin and Hobbes strip where they're about to make art and Hobbes keeps saying "smock. smocksmocksmocksmocksmock."

*sigh* I miss them.

I haven't seen all of the above films, so I can't speak to the deservedness of the Best Actress nominees, but I agree with others here that loved Juno but don't see Ellen Page's performance as earthshattering enough to take home Best Actress.

Maybe Julie Christie does deserve the win -- but part of me wants Cate Blanchett to get it this year because she was ROBBED for the first Elizabeth. Although the only really true justice would be for for the presenter to rip Gwyneth Paltrow's Shakespeare in Love Oscar out of her hands ON STAGE and give it to Cate Blanchett. Then Cate could, in her most dignified manner, use the Oscar to clock Paltrow upside the head and then spit on her crumpled form. That would be sweet sweet justice.

Posted by: Lizzie (greeneyed fem) at February 24, 2008 9:56 AM

Y'know, I've never been a big Brad Pitt fan, but even I thought he was pretty great in "The Assassination of Jesse James." I'd heard nothing about his performance at all to the point where I didn't even know he was in the movie before I started watching it. Seems a little unfair. Casey Afleck WAS great, though.

Posted by: Jimbob at February 24, 2008 11:21 AM

Lizzie (greeneyed fem), if I lived in your world, I would be a happy woman. And I think Maggie Smith should do that actual ripping-away-from-Paltrow-and-giving-to-Blanchett, and then sort of stand back and smirk in that genteel way she has as Blanchett piledrives Paltrow.

*sigh* Happy days...

Posted by: Smithy at February 24, 2008 1:00 PM

Oh, Pajiba. I can forgive you for placing the Cohens' script above Atonement, if only because the Atonement script is only truly appreciated if you read the book. I can forgive you for placing Tilda Swinton above Cate Blanchett. I can even forgive you for thinking the Ratatouille script above Lars and the Real Girl. But Ellen Page as Best Actress?!

Sure, Juno was a cute, funny movie, with a lot of "awww" moments. I'll admit that Ellen Page was more likable in this film than in anything else she's been in. However, this does not translate to being better than Marion Cotillard (who had the best performance of the year) or Julie Christie (who made a relatively unbearable film slightly watchable).

Posted by: Mary at February 24, 2008 3:36 PM

Oh my god, Smithy! I would PAY MONEY to see that. Cut to the Oscar audience: Dame Judi Dench clapping quietly, Meryl Streep trying to look shocked, and Kate Winslet and Emma Thompson holding on to each other, helpless with laughter.

Posted by: Lizzie (greeneyed fem) at February 24, 2008 8:52 PM

Possibly 'quel'. As I've been forgetting what's masculine and feminine, my spelling has fallen into chaos. I'm starting to have to get back into it now, so I'm glad it'll improve. I can get it back up to my late teenage years.

Posted by: Jo 'Mama' Besser at February 25, 2008 5:19 PM



searchthesite.jpg