web counter
 

Now that Elle Has All the Attention, Dakota Fanning Wants to Remind You That She's Not 18 Yet, Either

By Dustin Rowles | Posted Under Miscellaneous | Comments (23)

dakotafanning_marcjacobsdad.jpg

But don’t worry, folks. It’s not what you think it is. The placement of the flower, the pink ballerina outfit, the suggestive eyes, and the name of the perfume, Lola, are all purely coincidence. This is how all 17-year-old girls dress, right? There’s nothing at all Nabokovian about this perfume ad.

dakotafanning_marcjacobs.jpg

Good for you, Dakota. You’ve got another six months until you’re old enough to vote, you just continue being that innocent wise old soul with a flower in her crotch. Next year, it’s all pants suits and expensive handbags. You’re only young once, right?

(Source: People via Movieline)









Each Time You Like, Share, Tweet or Stumble a Pajiba Post, An Angel Does the Paul Rudd Dance

← Picking Cotton by Jennifer Thompson-Cannino, Ronald Cotton, and Erin Torneo | New Cowboys And Aliens Trailer: We Deal In Lead, Friend →









Comments

Oh dear christ. Fuck you Marc Jacobs. And Dakota, you were doing so well, honey. Avoid this path.

Posted by: tamatha at June 15, 2011 10:12 AM

So I guess this is her equivalent to Britney Spears' younger sister getting preggers: A perfume ad. The Fannings like to keep it classy.

Posted by: The Bean at June 15, 2011 10:17 AM

Wow. That was gross.

Posted by: Mrs. Julien at June 15, 2011 10:34 AM

Is there a term for the exact opposite of arousal? A reverse erection?

You tried last week with Natalie, Dustin, and failed miserably. 'Gratz!

Posted by: RobP at June 15, 2011 10:59 AM

Flowercrotch?

I think that'll catch on.

Posted by: , at June 15, 2011 10:59 AM

UGH! Just UGH! She is wearing a child's party dress. She doesn't even look like a teen. They made her look like a tween.

Posted by: Mrs. Julien at June 15, 2011 11:07 AM

This is confusing. She wants to be considered adult enough for some roles, like that awful movie about that band? What was it called? Whatever. She must have been 15 when they filmed it and she was singing "Sex Bomb."
In the vampire stuff she plays a baby faced vampire, but she is not a child because it is forbidden to turn a child into a vampire. (Sorry, I know that.)
Then this? I just don't get it.

Posted by: daria at June 15, 2011 11:26 AM

Oh Dakota, honey, no.

Posted by: MelBivDevoe at June 15, 2011 11:34 AM

Remember when Kathy Griffin got fired for making a joke about Dakota Fanning checking into rehab because HOW DARE SHE BESMIRCH THIS INNOCENT CHILD? I demand my public outcry against Marc Jacobs.

Posted by: Craig at June 15, 2011 11:46 AM

You really don't need to be Fellini to figure out the subtleties to this one, do ya? I didn't know Beavis & Butt-Head were the art directors for Marc Jacobs.

"Uhhh-huhhuhhuh, Hey Beavis check it out...she's growing a pink crotchflower..."

"Heeheehee...YeahYeah.....BOING-OING-OING."

Marc Jacobs VP: "My god, That's BRILLIANT! You boys will get a rise in pay for this!"

"He said "rise" Uhh-huhuhhuh!"

I'm not sure what is worse, the sexualizing of an underage girl by adults, the sexualizing of an underage girl in addition to making her look even younger than she already is by adults, or that nobody during the whole process (including said girl) didn't stop and think for a moment or two that maybe there was something inherently wrong about it.

Posted by: bleujayone at June 15, 2011 11:50 AM

I really hate that the word "Lolita" or "Lola" has a different connotation in general usage than from its Nabakovian origin.

Posted by: denesteak at June 15, 2011 11:53 AM

Um, yeah. Didn't the Kinks have a song about a "Lola".

Posted by: MRod at June 15, 2011 12:32 PM

Thought Dakota was 18 now. Not that it makes sexualizing a young girl ok but....

PLEEEEEEEZE don't Dakota, I had money on you for taking the road less traveled.

Posted by: kirbyjay at June 15, 2011 12:57 PM

"Is there a term for the exact opposite of arousal?
- Posted by: RobP

Turtling?

Posted by: Groundloop at June 15, 2011 1:20 PM

I have always loved DF because not only because she is good at her job, but because she is one of the few little girls out there who HASN'T at some point acted like a stupid little drug-taking, sex-tape making, vagina-flashing skank.

Please, please let this be as bad as it gets. If this is her acting out, I'll let it slide. Once.

Posted by: Skyler Durden at June 15, 2011 5:55 PM

You call this acting out ? Goddamn, but people are sad limp hand-wringing little wussies anymore. This is how Will Smith can buy his little crotchrat a music career and people think she's a thunderbolt from Jesus.

When Dakota's being half-dragged half-carried out of Hydes at 3 AM with white powder on her face, then it's time for sack cloth and ashes.

Posted by: Mr. Stitch at June 15, 2011 8:11 PM

What Mistah Stitch said.

Posted by: monkey_b at June 15, 2011 10:04 PM

"Is there a term for the exact opposite of arousal?
- Posted by: RobP

DErection?

Posted by: TJ at June 16, 2011 4:18 AM

Gotta say, I think I did worse stuff at 17. I feel like people forget what teenagers are like, with the whole "oh my GOD Taylor Momsen is SHOWING HER BOOBS." outcry and the like. I mean really? Have you met a teenage girl lately?
This photo is not really that big of a deal.

Posted by: Ruby at June 16, 2011 8:18 AM

You made a few good points there. I did a search on the subject matter and found the majority of folks will agree with your blog.

Posted by: Matthew C. Kriner at June 18, 2011 10:18 PM

Keep functioning ,fantastic job!

Posted by: Andrew A. Sailer at June 19, 2011 6:07 PM

I like the valuable information you provide in your articles. I’ll bookmark your weblog and check again here regularly. I'm quite sure I’ll learn many new stuff right here! Best of luck for the next! lets Play game

Posted by: Gregory Despain at July 1, 2011 3:22 PM

As a Newbie, I am always searching online for articles that can be of assistance to me. Thank you
free live wallpaper

Posted by: Issac Maez at July 11, 2011 7:39 PM