Is It Ethical for a News Network to Actively Advocate Against a Sitting President
Since the election of President Obama in 2008, Fox News has engaged in an ongoing and escalating campaign to prevent him from winning a second term. At all levels, the network has continued to violate ethical standards by promoting any and all causes that further its goal of making Obama a one-term president.
Is this an ethical way to run a news organization?
Moreover, as someone who listens to a fair amount of conservative talk radio -- because I like the theater and absurdity of it -- I often wonder if Fox News and conservative talk radio would actually suffer if President Obama were defeated? I mean, if you counted the number of times they mention Obama and the number of times they mention Romney, I'm guessing the former would outweigh the latter at least three to one. They spend the lion's share of their air time, not building up their own candidate, but tearing down Obama. Attacking Obama is a billion dollar industry. Without him, how would they fill their space?
The best television dramas need an awesome villain. What would Fox News do without their Big Bad? In the long-term, beating up President Obama may not be just bad ethics, it may be bad business. Indeed, in the financial grand scheme of things, what's one day of celebrating for the conservatives compared to four more years of complaining?
(Source: Media Matters)