web
counter
 

Hitchens Hates Beck, Obama Hates the Democrats, and Congress Hates the Gays

By Dustin Rowles | Posted Under Miscellaneous | Comments (17)



120610_obamatax.jpg

  • In the latest issue of Vanity Fair, Christopher Hitchens wrote a withering attack on Glenn Beck and the Tea Partiers, asserting that they are “canalizing old racist and clerical toxic-waste material that a healthy society had mostly flushed out of its system more than a generation ago, and injecting it right back in again.” He suggests that Beck and his followers:

    … need and want to sublimate the anxiety into hysteria and paranoia. The president is a Kenyan. The president is a secret Muslim. The president (why not?—after all, every little bit helps) is the unacknowledged love child of Malcolm X. And this is their response to the election of an extremely moderate half-African American candidate, who speaks better English than most and who has a model family. Revolted by this development, huge numbers of white people choose to demonstrate their independence and superiority by putting themselves eagerly at the disposal of a tear-stained semi-literate shock jock, and by repeating his list of lies and defamations. But, of course, there’s nothing racial in their attitude …

  • Meanwhile, Jon Stewart on “The Daily Show” last night marshaled evidence to support the notion that Barack Obama is not only fed up with Republicans, he’s irritated with those in his own party who believe that compromise is a sign of weakness.

    The Daily Show With Jon StewartMon - Thurs 11p / 10c
    National Displeasure
    www.thedailyshow.com
    Daily Show Full EpisodesPolitical Humor & Satire Blog</a>The Daily Show on Facebook


  • Who is Anonymous, the shadowy collective behind Operation Payback, the folks attacking perceived enemies of Wikileaks? It’s not The Hollywood Cog. Here are three other myths about Anonymous debunked by Valleywag.

  • Speaking of Wikileaks, the organization and Julian Assange have an unsurprising defender in Ron Paul, who gave an impassioned speech on the House floor in their defense. “”Which has resulted in the greatest number of deaths: lying us into war, WikiLeaks revelations or the release of the Pentagon Papers?”

  • Finally, repeal of Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell failed in the Senate. Again. Because why not? Let’s spend another five or ten years gripping onto a previous generation’s small-mindedness. (Wonkette)










    Each Time You Like, Share, Tweet or Stumble a Pajiba Post, An Angel Does the Paul Rudd Dance



    Holly Saves "The Office," Abed Saves Christmas | The Best Lines of NBC's Thursday Night Comedy Block | PANEM ET CIRCENSES | The Oscar Games Part I -- Best Actor In a Leading Role









    Comments

    I'd like to add another great article about Anonymous and Operation Payback:

    http://www.truth-out.org/exclusive-an-inside-look-hacktivist-attack-visacom65804

    Though the "exclusive" and "inside look" labels sound pretty stupid.

    Posted by: Scully at December 10, 2010 10:34 AM

  • "extremely moderate"? Since when, this week?

    Posted by: , at December 10, 2010 10:45 AM

    Whatever. Obama is a great president. I know he is because I have it from an unimpeachable (see what I did there?) source: The Chia company said so in an ad for Chia Washington, Chia Lincoln and Chia Obama: "three great presidents."

    I don't know how the Chia Obama is supposed to work, though, cause he doesn't have anything remotely like a 'Fro, green or otherwise. You'd have to trim that thing down to an 1/16th inch every day, which kind of defeats the point of having a Chia head, doesn't it?

    Anyway, the mere presence of stuff like Chia heads and and Tickle-Me Elmos and Cabbage Patch Kids and Pet Rocks and chunks of the Berlin wall are pretty much proof that the Democrats are right: We really DON'T pay enough in taxes.

    Posted by: , at December 10, 2010 10:56 AM

    Shame that "DADT" didn't get repealed. The military's own survey stated the rank-and-file had no issue with it. The Secretary of Defense (a Bush appointee) and the head of the Joints Chief of Staff asked Congress that it be done away with it. It's unconstitutional and it's demeaning.

    If we can't agree to stand on the side of freedom for American citizens whose only desire is to serve their country freely, then what the hell can we agree on?

    Posted by: Fredo at December 10, 2010 11:01 AM

    "...what the hell can we agree on?"

    Apparently nothing. With the filibuster threat looming over every single piece of legislation and the super majority it takes to pass anything, not a god damned thing.

    Posted by: Scully at December 10, 2010 11:11 AM

    Our government is irreparably broken. Until we remove "Congressman" and "Senator" as life-long job titles nothing will change. We need to neuter the House and Senates power. We need term limits, a cut in their salary, revocation of their outrageous pension, force them to follow the same rules in the laws they enact as those of us who elected them. No special treatment, no exceptions. They are a den of thieves and egotists. I have zero faith that they will lead us anywhere but further into a downward spiral and this goes for both parties.

    Posted by: TylerDFC at December 10, 2010 11:23 AM

    "American citizens whose only desire is to serve their country freely"

    And cock.

    Posted by: Bucko at December 10, 2010 11:27 AM

    Why is Ron Paul a surprising defender? Everything he has ever done indicates that he would support the kind of transparency that WikiLeaks' document dumps provide.

    He's not some asshat neo-con Republican. He's a hardcore libertarian that supports truth pretty much no matter the cost.

    Posted by: Vonnegut Slut at December 10, 2010 11:33 AM

    @Vonnegut Slut: I love ya, baby, but read Dustin's post again.

    Hey, ,, when has Obama not been moderate? Maybe in his escalation of the war in Afghanistan and his insistence on sanctions against Iran. But, domestically, there has been no sweeping liberal/progessive change. Even the healthcare bill was moderate, exemplified by the fact that it resembles the plans of three Republicans: Mitt Romney, Bob Dole, and Richard freakin' Nixon. Obama as an "extremist" is one of the biggest canards I've ever seen.

    Posted by: RobP at December 10, 2010 11:47 AM

    Wow. That explains why I was so confused by what I thought I read.

    I now officially dub myself an asshat. Damn you, lack of caffeeeeeeiiiiiiine! You make me read wrong.

    Apologies. (Everything I said after the inaccurate "surprising" comment still holds true. Love ya, Ron Paul!)

    Posted by: Vonnegut Slut at December 10, 2010 11:52 AM

    Dear ,,

    Are you one of those kooky Americans who thinks Obama is a "socialist"? Please tell me you are. Those people amuse me to no end. Silly Americans.

    Posted by: Brenton at December 10, 2010 2:04 PM

    Brenton, I don't think misunderstanding political definitions is something that is exclusively American so maybe try to be less condescending.

    Anyway, it's really a shame that DODT is sticking around. There are few things in the world that are clearly as wrong as DODT (as well as banning gay marraige), so it's a real bummer when heads remain firmly lodged in asses.

    Posted by: wonderbreadhead at December 10, 2010 9:08 PM

    So its business as usual.

    Posted by: clancys_daddy at December 10, 2010 9:30 PM

    For the record: Economic conservative, social libertarian, registered Republican but voted L for pres. in '08 and D for U.S. Senate and U.S. House in last election.

    "a cut in their salary"

    Tyler, They really don't make that much*, relative to other people in the entertainment industry, at least, but somehow they end up multimillionaires. I wonder how that happens? Can you explain, Alan B. Mollohan? Oh, wait, I see, it's because you can't spell "Alan B. Mollohan" without the lo-B.

    And haven't for a long time. Babe Ruth signed I think it was an $80,000/year contract and when asked what he thought about making more than the president he said, "I had a better year."

    Posted by: , at December 11, 2010 12:48 AM

    “Hey, ,, when has Obama not been moderate? Maybe in his escalation of the war in Afghanistan and his insistence on sanctions against Iran. But, domestically, there has been no sweeping liberal/progessive change. Even the healthcare bill was moderate, exemplified by the fact that it resembles the plans of three Republicans: Mitt Romney, Bob Dole, and Richard freakin' Nixon. Obama as an "extremist" is one of the biggest canards I've ever seen.”
    Posted by: RobP at December 10, 2010 11:47 AM

    See RobP, when you say things like “domestically, there has been no sweeping liberal/progressive change” you can’t be taken seriously. The health care bill, though not perfect it is on par with the origins of social security. The wall street reform bill, though not perfect in its present state is the first bill that will actually start to hold wall street accountable. The student loan reform bill, the Lilly Ledbetter Act, the new consumer protection agency etc etc etc. Now you may pooh pooh all of Obama’s accomplishments, but to say he hasn’t changed anything is beyond being naive. But moderately speaking I guess if you compare Obama to Gandhi or Mother Teresa then maybe he can be considered right wing. Now as far as that spectacle yesterday at the white house, I don’t think President Obama had former President Clinton speak to the media for his benefit. I think President Obama had Clinton speak to allay any fears that those weak and spineless democrats had.


    Posted by: Pookie at December 11, 2010 12:09 PM

    Good God, that Unreality "article" was terrible. Be honest: you sent us there so we'll never again bitch about Pajiba reviews, didn't you? That Unreality tripe made me want to give Prisco a big hug and possibly make-up sex.

    Posted by: Craig at December 11, 2010 11:16 PM

    Pookie, I agree with you, and I certainly think Obama's basically kept his campaign promises, so, yes, there has been change. But it isn't the kind of change that's glamorous, and doesn't effect us all in a very visual way. It's the slow moving, hard work kind of change that I, specifically, voted for.

    I kind of used "liberal/progressive change" sarcastically, because the way Democrats tell it he's done nothing that substantial (as in, the healthcare bill wasn't good enough), or because the way the Republicans tell it he's turning us Marxist (which is only slightly more ludicrous than what the D's say). Regardless of what he's done, though, calling Obama an "extremist" is still way off the mark. Allowing the legislative process to work (or to fail) is the opposite of "extreme". At least, it's supposed to be.

    Posted by: RobP at December 13, 2010 10:39 AM