free counter with statistics Claiming the Millennium ... and the Word | Pajiba - Scathing Reviews for Bitchy People

nmn.jpg



Claiming the Millennium … and the Word

The New Millennium Nigga

Miscellaneous | August 30, 2006 | Comments (30)


The New Millennium Nigga has been posting his musings since early February, and we’ve pointed you to him via Pajiba Love. If you’ve followed our linkage, you know that the NMN is wickedly smart, bitingly funny, touchingly heartfelt and unabashedly controversial. So, of course, we wanted him to muse about pop culture for us. The following is a slightly revised version of one of the NMN’s early posts, which we think serves as a good introduction to what he’s all about.

Morris O’Kelley, a friend of a loyal reader, responded to a forward entitled “New Millennium Nigga” with the response “New Millennium/Old Millennium … I’m not one of them.” He included an article he had written a couple of years back, outlining why he does not use the words “nigga” or “nigger” (you can read O’Kelley’s original article here). I felt compelled to respond, particularly because the author added the tag “(Regardless of what millennium you claim) .” That seemed like a personal barb, and here’s my response.

As one of the few black students in a predominantly white high school, I found that I had a lot of roles to play. One of those roles was protector of the younger black kids. At our school, as a fundraiser the student government would sell Valentine’s Beamers, little messages to be sent to sweethearts and friends on Valentine’s Day. Well, one year, some white students decided that they would use that forum to insult and intimidate some of the younger black students. There were drawings. There were epithets. I don’t remember the specifics, but you can fill in the blanks.

Anyway, my buddy Kenyatta and I were shown the messages and we took it upon ourselves to get to the bottom of it. We felt the need to regulate, to put it simply. We found out who had sent the beamers and confronted one of the perpetrators in the hallway between classes. Again, I don’t recall the specifics, but it probably went something like, “If you see a nigger, you slap a nigger.” A teacher then approached and shielded the white perpetrator from Kenny and me (two people mind you, though he would later describe us as a mob) and declared, “We’re not going to turn this into some inner-city high school.”

I think back on that incident and something strikes me. Someone can say “inner-city” and mean everything that Mo’Kelly claims is the only definition of “nigger/nigga.”

Over the course of American history, name changes have occurred; euphemisms have abounded. But whether I am described as an urban youth or a nigger, the NYPD will still shoot me dead for reaching for my wallet. And all my Yale degree will be good for is cleaning up the blood.

I understand that many may use “nigga” without thinking, but I do not. I was an Afro-American Studies major. And my study of and thinking about my people has gone far beyond those four years. I once kept the word out of my mouth. But the truth is that I honestly believe that the meaning of a word can be changed. If not, “We’re here/We’re queer/And we’re not going anywhere” wouldn’t be such a powerful refrain.

Further, as a matter of logic, my “brother” (and so far as I know we do not have the same parents), I think it is “cold” (not in temperature, but in sentiment) to “shit on” my musings (need I explain?) with your “bad-ass” article (bad meaning good) and demand that I “pump my brakes” (though I am not presently driving). If the word once meant black and it now means all that you say, then the meaning of a word can change. And if it can, then the entire underlying premise of your article is shattered. A new generation can use an old word in a new way and, to use a phrase from my youth, that’s “fresh” (though in no way related to produce). But at least you ain’t “fuckin’ with my cheddar” (though I have no idea about your sexual proclivities or feelings about dairy products), so I “ain’t gon’ raise up” (na’i’m sayin?).

I agree that the social problems that Mo’Kelly cites are indeed plaguing this nation. I simply disagree with the premise that the use of or prohibition of the use of the word will change anything at all.

Further, I do not demand that anyone else embrace the word. In fact, I have friends who do not agree with the use of the word, and I don’t use it when referring to them. As a matter of fact, I generally don’t use it much in their presence, just to show what respect I have for their personal decision (my musing about Al Sharpton is an obvious exception where I used the word in its two forms to clearly express my disappointment and anger to Rev. Al). But here’s what I will not do. I will not allow anyone to dictate to me from on high what I must think, do or say. That would make me their nigger. And as a New Millennium Nigga, I ain’t nobody’s nigger.

I enjoy debate. I think that the exchange of ideas is amongst the greatest gifts life has to offer. But anyone who would dismiss any and all thoughts I express based on my personal and political choice to use the word “nigga” is making a mistake. I believe I have something to offer … actually a great deal to offer our community. And to rebut your assertion that there is only one way for a given word to be received, I will say this: You say that your message is offered in love and I accept that. I accept that, though your words could be taken as an insult to my intellect and as an insult to my love of my people. As a matter of fact, I hope you and I can debate further on the matter, sit down and talk or even just e-mail one another, exchange ideas and “build,” as our brothers like to say. And, “my brother,” I will not refer to you as “my nigga.”

But I truly hope that you don’t think you can make me yours. I am a New Millennium Nigga and I don’t “get down” (not a reference to a depressed emotional state) like that. Tell a friend!

Orlando Bishop, a.k.a., A New Millennium Nigga, is a writer living in L.A. You can find more of his work at The Musings of a New Millennium Nigga.


Little Miss Sunshine | Illusionist, The



Comments

Good introduction, Mr. Millennium. Looking forward to your contributions ... I love Pajiba, but it did need some color.

Posted by: Phil at August 30, 2006 10:29 AM

Someone can say “inner-city” and mean everything that Mo’Kelly claims is the only definition of “nigger/nigga.”

Another "euphemism" popular in the South (ten years ago, anyway) is to use the word diversity to mean "there's too many of the Wrong Kind around here."

My introduction to Mr. Nigga, via Pajiba's "Necessary" link, was his commentary about George Allen's "Macaca" remarks, and I nearly got down on my knees to thank Pajiba for leading me to such riches.

I dance the Snoopy Dance at the thought of NMN providing pop culture commentary for Pajiba. I only hope that the extra work will not result in any decline in the quality or quantity on his own site. Everybody: Scroll on down and click that link under "The Necessary."

Posted by: Jerce at August 30, 2006 11:09 AM

How coincidental is it that as I sit down to write this, James Brown just cranked up Say it Loud on Launchcast...

Anyway, personally I think taboo words and ideas are just a barrier to discussion and understanding. Intelligent adults know the boundaries of good taste when they see them, and that words are tools of expression and nothing more. If they disagree with their neighbor over what those boundaries are, hey, more fruit for discussion. I've always enjoyed George Carlin's treatise on "bad words," and I think the ideas can be expanded beyond the carnally offensive. Anyway, welcome aboard.

Posted by: Eep at August 30, 2006 11:30 AM

It's all about intent. My black mother calls me 'nigger' when I piss her off (I take after my very white father) and only uses it as an insult. My brother and I call each other 'nigga' as a term of endearment. I know when the same word is being used in a derrogatory way - it's not about the power of a word, it's about the power behind the intention.

Posted by: courtney at August 30, 2006 11:41 AM

Good article, though unless I missed it, there is one component missing. Words have power, I agree, and there's a validity to "taking back" words like nigger or nigga, though I hate the phrase "taking back". But what is the reaction when you are called nigger, and I don't mean by one of your friends? Is that double standard acceptable? I ask out of genuine curiosity. To me, I could never be called nigger. Call me old fashioned, but it's got too much negative history.

Full disclosure - I'm half black, half white, born in South Africa during Apartheid, lived in an all colored neighborhood, moved here just before the State of Emergency was declared, to an all-white suburb with an all-white school. So I've definitely got the empathy thing going on. But if anyone, black, white, blue, green, ever calls me kaffir - that someone's getting knocked out. But that's me. To someone else, it might be fine (though I doubt it). Which brings me back to nigger - to me, it's the American kaffir. And if no one's calling me kaffir... well, I suppose you see where I'm going with this.

I don't have an opinion to offer on the subject, but I thought the question should be raised.

Posted by: TK at August 30, 2006 2:40 PM

Stupendously idiotic. All the justification in the world would not convince me to use that term in any circumstance, but I'm just one of few with common sense. Sad.

Posted by: Candy at August 30, 2006 4:02 PM

But what is the reaction when you are called nigger, and I don't mean by one of your friends? Is that double standard acceptable?

I was wondering about this as well. What I don't understand is, for those who say they're taking it back or changing the meaning, why is it automatically offensive when someone who isn't black says it (even when the intent is not offensive)? Is the point that no one outside of blacks can utter the word at all without it being offensive? If so, wouldn't it be contradictory to say the meaning has changed?

Just so you know, these are questions from a woman with two black parents, raised in a low income environment in the South. I choose not to use the word or any variations of it, but I always find it interesting when someone says the meaning of the word can change, yet no one else (outside of black folk, it would seem) is allowed to use it, even when the intent is not malicious.

Posted by: Daphne at August 30, 2006 6:44 PM

Daphne: I see exactly what you're saying, but I think it's just because there is so much negative history behind whites using it that the intent can only change it so much. That, and the fact that it hasn't really been fully "taken back" yet. So many whites still use the word maliciously that it's not as obvious what the intent is when a non-black uses it, whereas it tends to go without saying that a black person wouldn't use the word maliciously. Just my thoughts.

And I really look forward to reading more of this guy's stuff.

Posted by: Joe at August 30, 2006 7:47 PM

I'm black and I don't use the word. I understand why some people do and some don't. I grew up in my grandmother's house and she taught us not to use that word. Period. She grew up in Chicago during the time of the riots and the death of Dr. King. So if by chance that word passes my lips for any reason (like I'm repeating what someone else said?), I still cringe and look behind me like someone is coming after me to wash out my mouth with a bar of soap. The woman has been dead for over twenty years. But these are my issues.

I am not mad at you, NMN. The word's not going away.

Posted by: Greer at August 30, 2006 8:44 PM

Brilliant.


I, for one, am tired of getting shocked looks for referring to myself as a "happy little dyke". I don't mind people calling me that as long as they're not being hurtful, but everyone is so cautious and particular about the words. I generally find that the people wary of a word like dyke or nigger are still battling with their own prejudice.

...but that's just my two cents. =D

Posted by: anaxa at August 30, 2006 9:20 PM

Joe, thanks for your thoughts. I agree with what you said, which is why I'm leery when intent is used as a reason for the nigger/nigga variation, yet non-blacks are not "allowed" to use it. I understand the sentiment, but the reasoning doesn't really make sense to me. That being said, I look forward to reading NMN's thoughts on Pajiba.

I generally find that the people wary of a word like dyke or nigger are still battling with their own prejudice.

I don't know....that seems a bit presumptuous. I think that many people are just wary of offending someone. Given that we live in such a litigious society, I think it's also that people, especially in the workplace, don't want to get sued. People are ready to take legal action over seemingly small things these days (of course, definition of small things is relative), that there's a lot of tiptoeing going on. Individual perceptions of certain words can vary widely, and I think that some people decide to not use them at all out of respect. Of course, they may still think it, but I believe that a person's true thoughts/values/whatever are eventually revealed anyway, no matter what words they use or don't use.

Also, anaxa, if you're not wary of the word dyke - why would it matter if someone tried to use it in a hurtful manner towards you?

Posted by: Daphne at August 30, 2006 11:21 PM

The whole 'taking back' issue of the word becomes even more slippery when you think about the way that it is bandied about in the media. Take rap music--who's buying these records? A lot of suburban white kids who of course have the right to buy whatever they want, but who have no grasp of the enormity and history of they're saying when they parrot lines '...But she ain't messin' with no broke nigga'. The corollary of that is, you get whole swaths of that particular population thinking that this is the way that we speak to each other--that it is necessarily a part of the vernacular.

So couldn't it be argued that in examples such as these, artists who claim to have some kind of political or aesthetic bent are responsible for the widespread dissemination of crippling ignorance? And I'm not talking about responsibility as in moral obligation, because that's a whole other can of worms. But the question there is: what's worse, someone calling me nigger out of malice, or a person (of any colour) calling me that because they think I'll be cool with it-- that they'll somehow be relating to me on my urban level, therefore more making them very sensitive and politically correct? When did that happen? For fuck's sake, call me Marilyn! Both have happened to me at least, and honestly, both have set my blood on fire.

My thinking on the issue of reclaiming language in regards to words such as 'dyke', 'fag', or 'nigger', is that they're not really a perfect comparision because the visual aspect in play. A person can look at me, see that I'm black instantly, and hundreds of years of history are wrapped up in the very sight of me. Judgements are made, most of them unknowingly, before we have even exchanged names. While being homosexual is intrinsically a part of a person's being, and deserves to be celebrated along all of the other things that make any of us who we are, it is not something that can be observed instantly and initially. So when those (dyke, fag, etc.), words are exchanged, there is a better chance (not always, but you know what I'm getting at), that that language has followed a process of trust-building and perhaps comraderie. Of course there are exceptions, but that would be my guess, at least partially as to why this process of reclaiming the word 'nigger' has been so much more fraught than it has been for other words.

Posted by: M at August 31, 2006 12:46 AM

I have been reading NMN for a while (thanks Pajiba). Ever since the "Playard" post, I have been in stiches.

Can't wait for the pop culture commentary.

Perhaps a review of the Booty Butt-Cheeks video?

Posted by: Noel at August 31, 2006 1:33 AM

As an individual who's been publically maligned with that word, there will never be a justification for using.

Any black person who claims they're using it to 'take back' the word is a straight up idiot and I'm being kind saying that.

Posted by: Candy at August 31, 2006 7:09 AM

Thank-you, agreed!

Posted by: M at August 31, 2006 12:43 PM

As a frequent reader/infrequent commenter on this fine site, I do have to say at the very least Orlando has started some of the most thoughtful discourse I have yet seen on this site.

I too was introduced to NMN via his 'Playard' blog, and as a new father myself, I found it to be one of the funniest things I have read in a long while.

Keep us laughing and thinking!

Posted by: JH at September 1, 2006 2:38 PM

I am not mad at you, NMN. The word's not going away.

Give it another hundred years.

When the population levels in the U.S. change, more blacks, more latinos, more hispanics, more mixed-race... well, people will still use every slur in the book to insult one another, but there will be (hopefully) a better power balance between ethnic/cultural groups.

Every race has been king of the world at one point or another, and will be again.

Posted by: twig at September 1, 2006 4:31 PM

I don't understand how you can "take back" something that was never yours to begin with.

Posted by: cmoody at September 1, 2006 5:00 PM

First, love your blog (thank you Pajiba) and I am happy to see that you will be writing here as well!
Second, although I appreciate your points and I am happy to see dialog on the subject, I, as a very white girl, could never use it myself and not feel naseous. It's kinda like the "c" word in reference to women... when I hear a man use it, it makes me disgusted and angry and, to me, it shows a complete lack of respect for women and when I hear a woman say it in reference to another woman it makes me a little sad that she would contribute to the denigration of women and in a little way help make that word more socially acceptable. It is true that I may be a little sensitive and my metaphor may not be seen by some as the most ideal but there is waaaaay too much negative history and cultural context loaded into the n-word (and n-word lite) for me to ever feel comfortable using it in any situation.

Posted by: Zanna at September 1, 2006 5:10 PM

I don't understand how you can "take back" something that was never yours to begin with.

Posted by: cmoody at September 1, 2006 05:00 PM


Exactly

Posted by: Candy at September 1, 2006 8:37 PM

Mistah Nigga - your little story about why you decided to call yourself Nigga didn’t quite explain. My oldest daughter visited the local African American museum with her integrated middle school class back in the ‘80s. The white students made insulting remarks about black people (you can imagine the sort); arguments ensued. The white kids threatened the black kids and there was a near riot among the middle schoolers. Later, at home my daughter asked me if she could protest what happened by putting a sign on her locker. I told her she had a right to free speech. The next day, she put up a sign declaring COURAGE DOES NOT COME FROM A BASEBALL BAT. When she refused to take down the sign, I was called in by the principal. I backed her up and said that the school should investigate the incident. They told me no arguments or fights had happened. That a few students just “got upset.” That incident inspired my daughter to speak out and demonstrate against injustice in high school and as a young adult during the ’90’s. It did not inspire her to name herself any of the insulting slurs the white students used.

Mistah Nigga methinks you are an equivocatetah. There is no difference among nigger/nigga/niggah. Granny probably says “gimme some sugah” even if she otherwise speaks standard English and normally pronounces final r’s as in minor. That is because some African American phrase meanings are culturally bound by both pronounciation and lexicon. As far as lexicon, sugah and sugar mean the same thing.

What’s in a name? A rose by any other name we can’t visualize unless we speak another language. As slaves we were not allowed to name ourselves as a group or keep our own ethic group names. Imagine! Ashanti/Yoruba/Igbo. Those names were taken away from us and we were termed nigger which, using the patterns of our African languages, black people pronounced nigga(h).

When people talk about reclaiming the word nigga, reclaiming it from what or where? I have heard that in some African languages a similar sounding word meant king. Do non English speakers of African descent in the Diaspora use a similar sounding word as a self referent? If so, I’d like to know.

What exactly does the word nigga mean? Is there a difference between a self declared nigga in 1999 and a self declared nigga in 2000 - the New Millennium Nigga? To say meaning is determined by intention is an equivocation as well as an inaccuracy; except for irony. That isn’t the way language works. All language systems, including African American English are - logically, must be - predictably organized. For example, bad meaning good came about sometime in the ’50’s, I believe, and follows the AA custom of inverting meanings. There was a time when we used to keep some of our meanings to ourselves. But in this era of so called pop (brainwash) culture we keep nothing to ourselves. Everything is for sale.

Also why are some black people constantly referring to themselves with a word that refers to so-called race. For example something I hear - Niggas get on my nerves.- Why not “people get on my nerves?” -Them niggas better not come ‘round here. - Why not “ they better not come ‘round here?” - What’s up, Nigga? - How about “What’s up?” If you log the uses of the word nigga using a rubric of positive/neutral/negative as spoken by a group of high school students, for instance, most of the notations would be under the negative heading. I know, because I am a teacher at a high school which is 35% black. The school is for academically talented students; these teens come mainly from working and middle class families and they use the word far less than in what are termed urban schools. When I started teaching in 1980 at an all black poverty level high school, I heard the word occasionally. Today the word is used constantly in the conversations I hear among black youth from elementary school on up, somewhat less so at my school..

During the Civil Rights Movement, we called each other brother and sister, as do some church congregations. Now we could say the word brother or sister refers to someone with the same parents and brotha(h) or sista(h) refers to that part of humanity one wishes to consider as family. - Niggas get on my nerves - becomes harder to say as -Brothas and sistas get on my nerves, though brothers and sisters do get on each other’s nerves. Considering ourselves family makes us more patient with each other’s faults and shortcomings. Do we hear Europeans saying “White people get on my nerves !” Black people descended from being familiarly brothas and sistas in the ‘60’s to homeboys and girls to niggas. The first two terms designated community, the latter disunity and self hate- “I’ll kill a nigga.”

I’ve heard “I’ll kill a nigga “ from black youth conversing on the street or public transportation as well as in rap songs I’ve caught snatches of. In that context, what is the intent? What is the meaning? Is the word referring to a black male or female? Does the utterance mean the speaker will kill only a nigga and not a person of another ethnic group? Why is the speaker saying this? Try some replacements for nigga.

So, “I’ll kill a nigga“- How about I’ll kill a person/ brotha/? Less easily said. How about “I’ll kill Raheem or Leroy or James or Amir?” If we replace nigga with a true name then perhaps those who name themselves and define themselves as niggas won’t be killin’ each other as often. -Hey! My name is not nigga; it’s Kareem. - Spike Lee tried to hip us to that in Bamboozled in 2002.

The younger generation hasn’t reclaimed anything but slavery by using the word nigga(h) as a self referent. What they have done is dehumanize themselves to themselves. While there is a point to be made to not becoming all contorted by the word nigger, re-identifying themselves as nigga(h)s is reclaiming the lack of personhood of slavesbecause Europeans replaced true (African) names with the word nigger. To say that a nigga is not a nigger is a subterfuge.

Malcolm X said referring to the word Negro - A negro is nothing but an ex-slave. - I posit that a nigga(h) is a new (and former) millennium slave.

What is the difference between Mistah Jive Ass Nigga and Mister Jive Assed Nigger?

Posted by: posset at September 1, 2006 11:40 PM

posset: amazing.

Posted by: M at September 2, 2006 1:51 AM

Bravo to posset

Posted by: Candy at September 3, 2006 1:46 AM

Posset: I salute you sir, that reclaiming slavery part makes a good argument.

Still like NM's writing though and fully respect his position as well.

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at September 3, 2006 4:03 PM

Just to let you know... I am a woman.

Posted by: posset at September 3, 2006 4:12 PM

This reminds me of all the feminists who tried to reclaim "cunt" and failed. Sometimes the connotations are too painful, and epithets should be allowed to die.

Posted by: lucy at September 4, 2006 6:28 PM

Posset; you hit the nail squrely on the head!!
I am a white male chiropractor who grew up in a racially integrated neighborhood/school during the 60's and 70's. I was taught by my parents that all mankind is equal in the eyes of God. Even if NMN and I were close personal friends, I would be unable to use the variations on the word nigger. I don't recall ever saying it in my life other than as a reference or qoute.
I am not, as Anaxa said, "still battling with (my) own prejudice." And I agree with Zanna about the usage of the word "cunt." I am not one to use "curse words" but this word is so highly offensive to me, that I am shocked when someone uses it--especially women!!
It seems to me, that blacks who propose "taking back" the word, are attempting to do as the gay community has largely done: To call someone "queer", "fag", "dyke", etc these days is grounds for a shrug of the shoulders or outright laghter at the name caller.
However, I believe we as a society, have a long way to go before blacks would shrug their shoulders or laugh at being called "nigga(h)" by a white.
And really, is that what any of us want?

Posted by: derekthered at September 5, 2006 2:52 PM

This issue will continue to baffle and amaze people as some try to change the meaning of the word, others attempt to eradicate it all while being bombarded with it's glorification through pop culture. In NY, a young white guy (Italian roots) attacked a young Black guy and used the N-word while beating him half to death with a baseball bat. The white guy tried to get out of being charged with a hate crime by saying it was used only in a "young guy" sense--not racially motivated necessarily. This is what trying to change the word's meaning will get you. There will always be those who hide behind whatever is convenient to shield their hate and ignorance. Anytime someone is chasing me with a bat--even if he thinks I'm the one who broke into his car--and is calling me N___, that's hate and bigotry. All the rap songs and baggy clothes aren't going to change it.

Posted by: holding it down in NYC at September 5, 2006 4:20 PM

As a longtime reader of NMN's blog, I have never, ever agreed with his use of this word, nor will I ever. Never. Ever. I agree with many of the above posters. The word is just too loaded, and has too much negative, violent history. I have only been called the name in a negative sense, and while it only happened once, it came from a coward in a passing car (I was on my bike) who couldn't even say it to my face and handle the consequences (rabid beat-down). I think that our "friendly" use of the term is simply a manifestation of internalized racism, and its continued use only engenders confusion, as mentioned by others.

However, fellow disagree-ers, do not dismiss NMN without reading some of his other work. He is brilliant, hilarious, and politically on-target. I have referred his blog to my covertly radical, former hippie parents. But they have yet to look at it. They're put off by the name, natch.

Posted by: MaiGirl at September 6, 2006 7:25 PM

I am white.

I was raised to never EVER utter the n word. EVER.

When I hear my students say it to each other--and I'm including the white kids, too--I cringe.

It's funny, though---my best friend and I sometimes call each other "bitch" and it's affectionate. Or "whore." Seriously. I just got a voice mail from her in which she said "You whore, pick up your phone!" and it made me chuckle.

So I don't know. In the final analysis, it's really none of my business what people call each other out of friendship or jest or affection. But I can't get past being raised to believe it is one of the worst words a person can ever utter.

Posted by: Kathy at September 8, 2006 4:28 PM