web
counter
 

Avatar's Marketing Strategy Is Genius

By Christopher Campbell | Posted Under Miscellaneous | Comments (19)



avatar clip still.jpg

Forget that new, technologically advanced interactive trailer for Avatar. The real genius behind the film’s marketing has nothing to do with neat gimmicks (or not so neat, as many have noted) that reveal way too much about the plot. The main reason that everybody and their mom is going to see James Cameron’s latest blockbuster is because everybody and their mom thinks it looks like shit.

In an interview with CNN, Cameron admits his relief at the negative reactions to the Avatar trailers and such. “If everybody was embracing the film before the fact, the film could never live up to that expectation,” he said. “If everybody was just sort of praising it too much right now, that would make me even more nervous.”

Why would he feel this way? Maybe because he knows Avatar isn’t really all that. Or, just maybe he understands the power of low expectations. We saw it before, albeit accidentally, with the Star Wars prequels. I bet you legitimately think they got better with each installment. Nah, they just seemed better because with each one you had lowered expectations. And now next month you’re going to be impressed by Avatar because you anticipate a disaster.

But how does Cameron know that we’re going to see his movie despite our presumptions that it’s going to suck ass? Because he knows he’s James Cameron, King of the World, and he knows everyone wants to see what the director of Aliens, Terminator 2, and even Titanic has to show us after 10 years. It’s a bit egotistical on his part, but it’s the truth. And you can’t honestly deny your curiosity. You’ll be there opening weekend because you don’t want to believe Avatar is derivative, Delgo-rific garbage.

Every one of the following people criticizing ING’s new Avatar clip (and other hype machinery) can’t wait to see the movie. Many of them will get to see it for free, but whatever. They could stay home and watch Lawrence of Arabia instead.

  • Lane Brown at Vulture:
    Today CNN has an interview with Avatar director James Cameron in which [he] addresses the mostly negative reaction to his movie’s trailer […] We have some more good news for Cameron: IGN posted a brand-new Avatar clip today, and those blue things still look totally stupid to us.
  • Rob Bricken at Topless Robot:
    IGN has a new three-minute clip from Avatar, and I’m posting it because I feel I ought to, even though I don’t have anything praiseworthy or brilliantly cruel to say. It’s beautiful CG animation wasted on very stupid looking aliens. We know already. Whatever.
  • Vince Mancini at FilmDrunk:
    The scene is basically the Captain Kirk vs. the butthole monster scene from the Star Trek movie if you mashed it with Fern Gully: The Last Rainforest.  Speaking of which, I think I speak for everyone when I say that Thanadors would be a lot cooler if they could sing songs in the voice of Tone Löc.  If only he was still alive.
  • Devin Faraci at CHUD.com:
    Hey remember the Core chase in Star Wars Episode I: The Phantom Menace? That was what came to mind while watching the below clip from Avatar. At least that’s what came to mind when I saw this clip at Comic Con a number of months ago. It isn’t the mechanics of the Core chase that I’m reminded of — Star Trek’s ice planet chase was much more reminiscent of that — but rather the weightlessness of the action. Pixels chasing pixels through a pixel world.
  • The Playlist:
    One technical achievement the director is proud of is actually quite sad. “Even when we were doing “Titanic” twelve years ago, the shot at the bow where [Leonardo DiCaprio and Kate Winslet] kiss, we waited two weeks for the right sunset to get that shot. Now we just shoot it in front of a green screen and choose the right sunset later.”

    Geez, if that’s not a sad pullquote for the state of soulless cinema, we’re not sure what is.

  • Richard Rushfield at Defamer:
    Well, perhaps it will all look a lot better in 3D, but in the meantime, we should all strap in and prepare for what could well turn out to be the worst movie you have ever felt obliged to see.
  • Matt Goldberg at Collider:
    I don’t want to ward you off seeing footage from Avatar but I’m not exactly sure why Fox decided to put this new clip of a Thandor chasing down Jake Sully’s avatar (Sam Worthington) online when it’s clearly a big set piece that deserves to be seen in theaters and IMAX where you can really appreciate the craft and the dynamic sound design.

Answer: Fox did it to maintain our low expectation. Did it work?









Pajiba After Dark 11/24/09 | When You're Engulfed in Flames by David Sedaris













Comments

I really don't have an opinion. I'm not trying to be a hater-type, I just really have no feelings either way. . . maybe it's the cold. I don't know.

It looks goofy, but goofy can be good sometimes.

Posted by: adam at November 24, 2009 8:12 PM

I agree with The Playlist:

One technical achievement the director is proud of is actually quite sad. “Even when we were doing ‘Titanic’ twelve years ago, the shot at the bow where [Leonardo DiCaprio and Kate Winslet] kiss, we waited two weeks for the right sunset to get that shot. Now we just shoot it in front of a green screen and choose the right sunset later.”

Geez, if that’s not a sad pullquote for the state of soulless cinema, we’re not sure what is.

Is there something a little more special about waiting for that right sunset? Can you even tell in the finished product? Or am I being oversensitive?

Posted by: Daniel Hall at November 24, 2009 8:23 PM

I for one will not be bothering with this one, train wreck or not.

Posted by: Alli at November 24, 2009 8:36 PM

I've wanted to see Avatar since the summer. But I go in expecting nothing.

Now, am I as looking forward to it as I was District 9? Nope.

Posted by: Fredo at November 24, 2009 8:45 PM

People can talk shit all they want. Like it was stated, I am going because he is the fucking creator of The Terminator, he didn't sink Aliens but made it better imo, made True Lies action packed and funny and made the best movie in the whole freaking world. I need not mention the name.

Besides all of that it will be in IMAX. Why the fuck would someone that loves movies stay away? Fuck that, I'm there. Fuck all the haters.

Posted by: Candy at November 24, 2009 8:56 PM

Wait? Is Tone Loc dead?

WHEN DID THIS HAPPEN?

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at November 24, 2009 9:28 PM

I find it kind of frustrating that anyone more skeptical than frothing at the bit for the film has been lumped under the mass flag of "haters," as if there's absolutely no middle ground between your excitement level being 0 and 100. I'll see it, of course, and if it's great I'll be thrilled, but you'll pardon me for not polishing my Movie of the Year trophy in preparation for a month beforehand.

Posted by: Tim at November 24, 2009 9:28 PM

"made True Lies action packed and funny and made the best movie in the whole freaking world. I need not mention the name..."

--------------------------------


He made Reign of Fire?

It's not even listed on IMDB!

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at November 24, 2009 9:29 PM

I want this to succeed for two reasons:

1) To vindicate Final Fantasy: The Spirits Within
2) To keep that Battle Angel Alita project alive.

Those are enough for me to guarantee at least a cursory view.

Something I noticed with Cameron. lets look at his biggest films:

- Terminator: light romantic subplot that was over quickly
- Aliens: unless you count the facehugger, no romantic subplot
- The Abyss: heavy romantic subplot, also one of his least regarded films
- Terminator 2: unless you count Arnie and Furlong, no romantic subplot
- True Lies: light romantic subplot between two married people that were full of awesome
- Titanic: Overdone romantic MAIN PLOT, with the actual boat sinking as the subplot

I am thinking Cameron's main flaw is the romance. Not that it is bad (lets not get into that again), just that he is bad at it. Unfortunately, form the trailer it looks like we are gonna get it anyway. Maybe he took some classes or something.

Wait? Is Tone Loc dead?

Dude, he just wouldn't stop messing with the Funky Cold Medina.

/I have no idea, but I think he is still alive.

Posted by: Smoking Crater (formerly Vermillion) at November 24, 2009 9:44 PM

You know, my brother was killed by a funky cold medina.

/scrubs

Posted by: vikky at November 24, 2009 9:46 PM

I'm looking forward to it. I've liked all of his movies beside the silly shipwreck one (even Battle Beyond the Stars and Piranha 2: The Spawning).

Posted by: Adam C at November 24, 2009 11:11 PM

Fuck, if I saw Beowulf I will see this.

(I like animation. Sue me)

Posted by: twig at November 24, 2009 11:28 PM

What the hell is going on in that still? Is Worthington's Na'vi doing the Saturday Night Fever pose? (Obviously I haven't watched the clip, if that answers my question. I'm keeping myself mostly unspoiled on this one.)

Here's what I want to know. Will IMAX actually be the best way to watch this thing? If it's shot digitally, won't there be some measure of visual quality lost in the transfer back to film? Should I be watching this in the "fake IMAX" format instead? I know nothing about the tech stuff, but it seems like an obvious question.

Posted by: DarthCorleone at November 25, 2009 12:03 AM

James Cameron is Mr. Eye Candy, so the fact that this looks lackluster on a you tube feed on my computer screen doesn't bother me too much. And I'm honestly not expecting Kuberick or Nolan level storytelling here, I just want the story/acting/etc. to not suck so bad it takes me out of the cool exploding shit.

And, yet, I'm kinda underwhelmed too. I mean, yikes, this is basically Dances With Fucking Wolves in outer space, isn't it? Or am I missing something?

Posted by: Irving Washington at November 25, 2009 12:50 AM

Yes, you are.

It's Dances With Fucking Wolves in outer space IN 3D!!!!!

Posted by: Daniel Hall at November 25, 2009 1:18 AM

The trailer was meh, but Jim Cameron is the reason I'm considering seeing this. He was the most dependable blockbuster director of the 80's/early 90's and despite coming across as a control freak with delusions of grandeur, it's seems that that is exactly what you need to be to pull of this sort of thing.

Posted by: Squirrelgripper at November 25, 2009 1:53 AM

It's Cameron. He gets the benefit of the doubt from me. I was underwhelmed by the teaser, but I like the full trailer. I do hope there is more going on story wise then what the trailer seems to reveal in its entirety. In HD on TV it looked pretty damn good and I'm sure it's still being polished up. We plan to venture to the IMAX for the first time just to see Avatar in 3D.

The Abyss may be underrated, but that makes it no less fantastic. Better than T2 in my opinion, especially the director's cut of The Abyss.

Posted by: TylerDFC at November 25, 2009 6:47 AM

I had zero excitement for this movie until I watched this trailer... but now, what's the opposite of zero excitement?.... no not that far from zero excitement.
I'll see it because I love sci fi and it seems to have a pretty cool sci fi plot - also it has marines and cool ass robot things with marines on the inside of them.
Sold to the man in the back with his hands down his pants!

Posted by: The Chief at November 25, 2009 8:50 AM

Cameron should have stuck with it as claymation.

Posted by: Odnon at November 25, 2009 11:31 AM


















Viral Hits

>> Pajiba Movie Posters

>> Pop Culture's 20 Greatest Dancing GIFs

>> Mindhole Blowers

>> The 100 Greatest Insults of All Time

>> The "Other" 100 Greatest Movie Quotes

>> The 100 Greatest Movie Threats of All Time

>> The Sean Bean Death Reel

>> Chicks Dig Beards: It's Science

>> The Coolest TV Show Title Sequences

>> The Most Rewatchable Movies

>> The Most Expensive Movies of All Time