free counter with statistics A Dork Who Stutters and a Vagina that Bites | Pajiba - Scathing Reviews for Bitchy People

teeth.jpg

A Dork Who Stutters and a Vagina that Bites

Daily Dispatches from Sundance / Dustin Rowles

Miscellaneous | January 27, 2007 | Comments (34)


I think there are maybe five perfect films in the history of cinema. I’m not talking about the absolute best films; I mean flawless. Movies I can watch a hundred times and never find anything I’d change. Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind, The Third Man, Double Indemnity, Bottle Rocket, and now Rocket Science.**

Rocket Science, which was written and directed by Jeffrey Blitz (Spellbound), is about a kid with a stutter who joins the debate team because he falls in love with a cute debating whiz who’s also in on the recruiting process. But more than just that, Rocket Science is about the ignominious torture of high school; it’s about the unknown, and speech, and the triumph of Trenton, New Jersey; it’s about Clem Snide, and love, and revenge, and it’s about ordering a fucking slice of pizza. But mostly, what it’s not about is cheap victories, or false epiphanies, or phony climaxes. It’s real. And it is absolutely perfect, a film I expect I’ll watch 20 times over and never find a flaw. Indeed, if I were handing out the grand jury prize here at Sundance, Rocket Science would win by a mile.

Unfortunately, the exhilarating high that I had after watching Rocket Science was short-lived, because an hour after I walked out, I was watching Mitchell Lichtenstein’s Teeth, a film about — what else — the vagina dentata myth. Certainly, the premise was intriguing — who wouldn’t be curious about a horror film concerning an abstinence-preaching high-school prude who discovers, when a classmate has sex with her against her will, that she has, well, teeth in her cho-cha. And while she’s not comfortable with the mutation at first, she ultimately uses her condition as a weapon, becoming a sort of feminist heroine. (I’m sure Ratner, right now, is trying to think of a way to work her into the next X-Men flick.) Unfortunately, Teeth, which was apparently inspired by Camille Paglia (a professor of Lichtenstein’s in college), is little more than a fascinating premise and a lot of severed penises. It’s supposedly a female-empowerment flick, but I think that’s a bit of a stretch. At its best, it’s a Troma film with a highfalutin mythological premise, which was apparently enough to get it into Sundance. In fact, I’d be surprised if Troma or Blue Moon hasn’t already explored the vagina dentata myth in one of its low-budget horror films, though I suspect they would have referred to it as something else, like The Razor Blade Muff or The Barking Cooter. Good news, though: Lichtenstein is already working on a sequel.

I followed Teeth with Crazy Love, which has gotten quite a bit more buzz at Sundance than it probably deserves. It’s a documentary about Burt and Linda Pugach, who had the mother of all fucked-up relationships, beginning in 1959 and continuing until the present. I mean, it’s worse than Sienna Miller and Jude Law or even Pete Doherty and Kate Moss. We’re talking O.J. and Nicole, only imagine it if Nicole had survived her stabbing and then taken O.J. back? That’s just about what Crazy Love amounts to. Unfortunately, their bizarre, co-dependent relationship isn’t really given its due by the director, Dan Klores, who has some serious pacing issues — it takes a full hour for the story to ever take off. It’s also an old-school “A&E Biography” type of documentary, the kind that relies heavily on stock footage and old photos to go along with personal interviews. It’s not a bad film; it just could’ve been so much better.

Finally, I ended the day with La Misma Luna, from Mexican director Patricia Riggen, a newcomer who I’d argue already stacks up well with the three Mexican directors who received so much acclaim last year. La Misma Luna is an incredibly humanizing portrayal of life as an illegal immigrant in the United States and, at the same time, a film about the real bond between a mother and a child. And it manages to explore both of these themes in a way that is neither saccharine, preachy, fake, or annoying, which made it all that much more effective. I really liked Pan’s Labyrinth, Babel, and, to some extent, Children of Men in 2006, but each of them was infused with a sort of Mexican machismo — the emotion was of the dry, masculine variety, while La Misma Luna is wet and poignant and far more touching than Riggen’s male counterparts would allow their films to be. It’s a remarkable movie, one that no doubt will be released in the fall (it was bought two days into the festival) and compete next year in the Oscar race.

And here’s the biggest irony to my day at Sundance: It was the best overall I’ve had in terms of the quality of films, and I didn’t see a single celebrity, either in person or in a film.

Dustin Rowles is the publisher of Pajiba. He lives with his wife in Ithaca, New York. You may email him, or leave a comment below.


Pajiba Love 01/26/07 | Blood and Chocolate



Comments

Author's Note: Many, many thanks to Joanne for the great recommendation.

Posted by: Dustin Rowles at January 27, 2007 10:41 AM

The Barking Cooter. Awesome.

Posted by: Tom at January 27, 2007 11:18 AM

"Um, there's a cello in your house now."-Rocket Science

Posted by: Joanna at January 27, 2007 1:20 PM

"I really liked Pan's Labyrinth, Babel, and, to some extent, Children of Men in 2006"

Those were pretty much the three best films of the year, I thought (although I would gladly add on 'United 93' and 'Little Children'). I'll be interested to watch 'La Misma Luna' and see how Riggen contributes to this wonderful Mexican cinema boom...

And has 'Rocket Science' been picked up by anyone for release? Some high praise there.

Posted by: stacy at January 27, 2007 1:35 PM

'Rocket Science' sounds fantastic. I can't wait to see it.


The Barking Cooter. I love you guys.

The only way I'd see Teeth is if it was a dorky kid who worked at a fast-food restaurant and referred to the ..'teeth' as 'Pillowpants'.

Posted by: Mara at January 27, 2007 2:30 PM

didn't Troma do Killer Condom? The Rubber That Rubs You Out!

Posted by: Betty Machete at January 27, 2007 2:31 PM

awww.... someone beat me to "killer condom"! yeah, it was troma, and although it didn't involve a vag, it still got around to the same weiner biting premise.

Posted by: jonny boy at January 27, 2007 4:45 PM

"The Razor Blade Muff or The Barking Cooter..."
Goddamn, you make me laugh.
Also, I had no idea that was what Teeth was about - I never really even heard of it. This supposed to be a horror movie? I guess any idea inspired by the shrill, loud-mouthed Paglia would be kinda scary.

Posted by: vadge_patrol at January 27, 2007 5:20 PM

barking cooter... that's too fine....

Posted by: demondoll at January 27, 2007 7:28 PM

Some people call it a kaiser blade....I call it my hoo-hah....

Posted by: Kate at January 27, 2007 8:22 PM

I guess any idea inspired by the shrill, loud-mouthed Paglia would be kinda scary.

The idea's been around since long before Paglia--see vagina dentata. My question is, did they ever show the thing or did they have to work around it to avoid an NC-17?

Posted by: Jesse M. at January 27, 2007 10:21 PM

Teeth sounds naff but I wouldnt mind watching it.

Posted by: Jean at January 28, 2007 10:04 AM

Love your take on Teeth, it would certainly make a date extortionist think about his final strategy. I saw the Children of Men and thought, although it was really hard to keep up with the indie film-like sound( they usually dont have the most sophisticated sound equipment) and the accents, the film was dark and interestingly enjoyable. Good battle scenes.

Posted by: Jazzman at January 28, 2007 1:47 PM

Joanna, how do you become a Sundance Volunteer???It sounds like a lot better than fighting fires. That Rocket Science sounds really good.

Posted by: Jazzman at January 28, 2007 1:52 PM

Oh man, volunteering is the BEST. You can submit an application online here:
http://festival.sundance.org/2007/festival/volunteers.aspx

It's pretty competative and I think the only reason I was selected a few years back was because I had my own lodging. I honestly don't know what makes a good candidate. The good news is, once you're in, you're in, and it's a blast. And you get free stuff!!

Posted by: Joanna at January 28, 2007 2:20 PM

Oh p.s. this is the best short film I saw at the festival. So tight.

http://festival.sundance.org/2007/watch/film.aspx?which=792&category=SF

Posted by: Joanna at January 28, 2007 2:29 PM

Babel, Children of Men and Pan's Labyrinth were directed by men, hence the "machismo", while obviously the director of La Misma Luna is female, hence the refreshing absence of "machismo"...so what's your point? The three male directors did an excellent job with their films despite that "Mexican machismo" you speak of...but aren't almost ALL films in the world dominated by the male perspective anyway? Think about it...women have far less power and influence especially in the film industry, there are precious few women that make as much money as men do aside from actresses like Nicole Kidman or Julia Roberts....also if female directors want to succeed they need to sell out to the mainstream, their "chick flicks" rarely get recognized unless it's someone like Sofia Coppola (who thanks to her dad got some acclaim)...anyway...just a comment..

Posted by: Gina at January 28, 2007 6:22 PM

ETERNAL SUNSHINE OF THE SPOTLESS MIND???

Rowles, you have got to be fucking KIDDING me.

FLAWLESS?????

You know, much as I dislike that movie, I am always willing to credit it with being original, well-directed, well-acted, well-written, etc. -- my dislike of it is purely on a personal level.

But even granting it ALL of the above, I still could NEVER accept the description of Eternal Sunshin eof the Spotless Mind as fucking FLAWLESS.

If for NO other reason (and there are MANY other reasons), there is one FINE reason to absent ESotSM from any list of FLAWLESS films:

KIRSTEN DUNST IS IN THE FILM.


Now, Dustin, you must approach such designations with much greater care henceforth. You know full well that FLAWLESSNESS is so rare a descriptive it requires -- well, a total lack of flaws. And that includes everything from, yes, the CAST, to the makeup and wardrobe to the editing to the credits and to the continuity.

CONTINUITY.

Go check the continuity on ESotSM.

Posted by: Maryscott O'Connor at January 28, 2007 8:52 PM

"also if female directors want to succeed they need to sell out to the mainstream, their "chick flicks" rarely get recognized unless it's someone like Sofia Coppola (who thanks to her dad got some acclaim)"

A bit off topic but...

Gina, while I understand what you are saying in your comment, I want to pseudo-defend Sofia Coppola by saying that while yes, clearly she got her foot in the door, gets money, and can do what she wants for the most part because of her father... she still has her own talent and vision as a filmmaker. Whether you like it or not, she has a distinct style, and I appreciate her as an artist (while still jealous that I have no said connections to help me do whatever I want). Just saying - it's not like her work is total crap and her father just keeps shoveling money her way.

And her getting acclaim, even if it is because of her famous father, at least brings some light on the fact that there are so few respected female directors when compared to male directors. She was only the third women to get an Oscar nomination for Best Director, and I read numerous articles about it at the time. So, more power to her if she can at least bring a little attention to that sad state of affairs.

Posted by: stacy at January 29, 2007 1:17 AM

Maryscott O'Connor, you are so completely right!

Dustin, I am sure Rocket Science is a fine film. But if it features the music of Clem Snide, which I think is inferred in your review, then it can't be flawless.

And while I love The Third Man and Double Indemnity, I'm not sure I'd call either of them flawless. The other films you mention... let's just say your bar is waaaaay too low.

Posted by: Dot at January 29, 2007 2:41 AM

Get your own teeth.... http://www.rapestop.net/

(Don't get me wrong, as a form of personal protection, the idea of this product sounds like a great thing. Just a little ill-conceived as far as execution. The movie premise just reminded me of this...)

Posted by: JLo at January 29, 2007 9:28 AM

...but aren't almost ALL films in the world dominated by the male perspective anyway?

Absolutely, Gina. And as I mentioned in comments on another review, it gets so boring.

I would add that the male perspective can also be perpetuated by women writers and filmmakers. (This was certainly encouraged by the male professors during the brief time I spent in graduate film school in the 90s.) Perhaps it's another way women who are writers filmmakers sometimes have to sell out to the mainstream.

Posted by: Lilly at January 29, 2007 9:57 AM

Singing in the Rain is flawless.

Eternal Sunshine is flawed.

Posted by: d at January 29, 2007 10:04 AM

Does anyone else start to hear the song "Hakuna Matata" when you see the phrase "vagina dentata"? I'm not familiar with the vagina dentata 'phenomenon', but eh, just random.

Thanks for the heads up on Rocket Science too. This former speech team geek will definitely check it out.

Posted by: em at January 29, 2007 12:39 PM

Though I do believe it is possible to jump the bones of the cold dead whore that has become Sundance, I have to say that most y'all are being unfair to Dustin here. On the whole, movies that get stamped with the Sundance sticker are bad, pretentious, wandering, and needlessly so that I keep away from them on the movie shelves. I have been duped by that graphic packaging too many times. I can understand that in the environment of hyperbole and straight dishonesty, the temptation to categorize everything by extremes might have gotten the best of you, DR. What I don't understand are the rest of you. It only seems that red-beanie and Mr. Rowles were the only two at the festival. You guys should be immune to the effects.

I agree about Eternal Sunshine being flawless. If you've ever loved deeply and just didn't quite make it, this movie is in the emotional context for seeing its perfection. Yes, Kirsten Dunst is in it. Love makes mistakes. I think I could defend every second, every shot of this film if need be. Why is there a falling car at both ends of the street? His circuitry is being overloaded.
But why would you want to go and ruin your own conclusions? Notwithsanding DR's undying loyalty for David Gordon Green's All the Real Girls is little beyond me, Eternal Sunshine is a movie not simply great for lost love; but beautiful, poigniant, and wise the way film wants to be art.

I think that the rub with DR's comment, however, is in saying These are the 5, only. I think American Psycho, This Is Not A Lovesong, Albino Alligator, Four Rooms, and Deceiver are similarly "flawless". Those are just off the top of my head. I am sure we could think of more, but there is nothing I could change about those films.
I am sure I could think of five older films, or five Russian films, or five Asian films: that I could also call flawless. That's my personality. Those five Dustin mentioned are his.

All that being said, I loved this daily dispatch thing. I found your take very interesting; and this will save me from missing the two films per year that Sundance has worth watching.

Thanks.

Posted by: Jackseppelin at January 30, 2007 1:54 PM

Loved the Sundance updates and am already looking forward to seeing Rocket Science and La Misma Luna. Agree with others that the presence of La Dunst irrevocably bars ESotSM from the flawless list. In its place I suggest Brokeback Mountain, every frame, every scene, every word, every silence is perfection.

Posted by: rudy at January 30, 2007 2:37 PM

i was a volunteer this year and loved rocket science, too. honestly, be glad you people who are curious weren't volunteers this year -- the festival sucked. i only worked 40 hours but still only got to see 6 movies because they slashed the amount of reserved volunteer seats (even though they raised ticket prices). next year should be better since they never have the same coordinators (they always quit their first year) and so many volunteers were pissed off about getting the short end of the stuck.
dustin, you didn't cover any of the docs this year and there were some great ones, notably manda bala and a very british gangster. whats up?

Posted by: care at January 31, 2007 11:37 AM

Jackseppelin, the problem is that we should use words to use what they *mean*. Flawless means without flaws. Talking about context as a way of excusing its use is just dumb, because an absolute (flawless) doesn't rely on context. It's like people who use "literally" when they mean "really" or "very". Or people who say "very unique". It makes no sense.

It's possible that there's a single film out there, somewhere, that's flawless. But I doubt any film director in the world would agree. All films involve some form of compromise. That's why good ones are hard to make.

So please, Dustin, say what you mean, not some rough approximation based on hyperbole.

Posted by: rocky at February 1, 2007 2:10 AM

While I love the idea of Rapex (and vagina dentata in general), I have to go along with those who are saying that the majority of films are dominated by the male perspective. The only movie directed by a woman that I enjoyed was American Psycho, and one can easily see how that came about. Most female directors are forced into restricting themselves to chick flicks - or (and I suspect this is far more likely) they're just wired that way. Maybe I'm just a subtle misogynist. Or maybe most female directors are too female for the industry.

Posted by: Lola at February 2, 2007 1:30 AM

"Does anyone else start to hear the song 'Hakuna Matata' when you see the phrase 'vagina dentata'?"

Well, I didn't. Thanks.

Posted by: Craig at February 2, 2007 8:46 AM

They did NOT cut the volunteer tickets this year. We worked 8.5 hours a day and managed to see 17 films. You just gotta plan, yo.

Posted by: Joanna at February 2, 2007 11:56 PM

Hm, interesting. Eternal Sunshine as flawless - in much the way that Grosse Point Blank is flawless, but with richer acting?

Gotta go with The Third Man. I made sure to own that on DVD just in case I met someone who didn't know about Welles (have also just loaned out "Touch of Evil" for noir comedy research)

BUT, back to the show...

Vagina Dentata - wow, been a while since I've seen that term used. I'd say half of David Cronenberg's work sublimates the vagina dentata (Videodrome, Rabid) as much as phallic masculine energy. Camille Paglia's vengeful God(dess) probably has one, too.

On a pop culture note: Glad that filmmakers didn't work a vagina dentata into the much-freaked out about rape scene that apparently features Dakota Fanning, or we would have read news reports of people's heads exploding (Hey, like in Scanners!). Somehow, she's too young for Americans ro accept an ability to manifest her own rage as a victim, but that's for another thread. Let's bring in the clumsy hollywood examples of victims enacting revenge later.

Vagina dentata translates as toothed cave, and figures prominently in ancient heroic archtypes and mythology. It's the earth from which the hero strggles for rebirth and tranformation (you're a eunuch - TA DA!), having to die in order to accomplish the quest. Christ is only the most popular version, but Gilgamesh and Beowulf are also pretty big celebs. The earth(and/or cosmos) being the big momma (Baba Yaga & Kali are two of her darker aspects) , the void (Lacuna Beach?) that threatens to consume our every effort to state that we're alive and important. Getting your willy snipped off my the Goddess' cave (should you be so rash as to enter without permission) seems like therapy for some of the wrong reasons, but so be it.
Ginger Snaps (1 & 2) are pretty clearly about the VD, Little Shop of Horrors less so, perhaps. But the ancient myths creep onto the back lots because we're all afraid of such darkness.

I don't expect a lot of Frat Boys will rent this for a date movie.

Posted by: damien walder at February 3, 2007 4:27 PM

you all do a good coverage of sundance, thanx

Posted by: Fukkad at February 4, 2007 10:37 AM

I remember seeing a film titled Killer Condom (or was it Killer Kondom?) some years back.
Scceeeeeeeeeeeery!

Posted by: Paul Curtin at February 7, 2007 2:48 PM