web
counter
 

A Case Study in Hotness

By Joanna Robinson | Posted Under Miscellaneous | Comments (45)



Ryan Gosling.jpeg

Introduction and Purpose

When I was younger (so much younger than today), my room was plastered with pages ripped from magazines. I was obsessed with the high-concept, meticulously-styled spreads in the glossies. Annie Leibovitz was a god to me. Whilst perusing the internets, I noticed that next month’s cover boys for two of the glossiest of glossies were gents that made my heart pound despite being on opposite ends of the hot spectrum (one’s fair, one’s dark…one’s meticulously groomed, one looks like he smells really, really, truly, I mean very, I’m not kidding bad). I decided the only way to deal with this anomaly was to Do Some Science (plus I enjoy wearing a lab coat and goggles, plus I need more beakers in my life, muppet or otherwise).

Hypothesis

A side by side comparison of two radically different specimens of male beauty will yield concrete and empirical conclusions about aesthetics.

Materials
1. The January 2011 copy of “Vanity Fair” featuring Johnny Depp.
2. The January 2011 copy of “GQ” featuring Ryan Gosling

Data

Figure 1

cover_vanityfair_300.jpeg


In Fig. 1 Mr. Depp is employing what is known in the Scientific Community as the “I’ve-been-living-in-Europe-can’t-you-just-smell-my-odeur-wafting-off-the-pages” offense. He or some hapless make-up artist has ground the customary stick and a half (no more, no less) of kohl around his eyes. Mr. Depp is not only is patchily bearded but also, displaying an almost Diane Keaton-esque skittishness about his neck, haphazardly bescarved.

Figure 2

Alternatively, in Fig. 2, Mr. Gosling, suited, tied and pocket squared, stares down the camera with some unearthly, nigh-on Aryan peepers (that’s scientific, right? peepers?). His brow is quizzically cocked as if to say, “Hey girl, I agree, my suit is a little shinier than I would like, but they let me keep this much stubble and I mussed my hair a bit while no one was looking. So I still look masculine, right girl?”

Figure 3

o-johnny-depp-is-vanity-fair-s-jan-cover-boy-compares-angelina-to-elizabeth-taylor.jpeg

Because we thought it would be Professional and Scientific to examine the specimens from another angle we present Mr. Depp in Fig. 3, squinting off into the distance, likely thinking about Tim Burton, or how whimsically European even his light sockets are. We, the Scientific Community, approve of his decision to cover the skull and cross bones tattoo in this shot (it’s just excessively piratical).

Figure 4

Ryan Gosling-1.jpeg

Finally, in Fig. 4, Mr. Gosling holds court with a shadow which is obviously and scientifically a metaphor for his thoughtful soul and contemplative nature. (My inner self totally wears a hat too.) Also, the Scientific Community is unsure when Mr. Gosling got so tremendously muscled. Our feelings are…mixed.


Conclusion

Our conclusion is, well, inconclusive. We do believe, however, that we have proven what rhetorical lengths we will go to just sos you can look at some pretty fellers. Don’t say we never gave you anything, cause we gave you this.

Joanna Robinson lives in Northern California and the last time she successfully completed any science was her 5th grade Science Fair Project entitled “Does Humidity Affect The Longevity of a Soap Bubble.” If you take exception to her Scientific Method, she doesn’t blame you.









Each Time You Like, Share, Tweet or Stumble a Pajiba Post, An Angel Does the Paul Rudd Dance



If I Were the Type of Exceedingly Lame Person Who Still Used the Word 'Geekgasm,' I'd Use It Here | "Paul" Trailer | Fundamentalist Conservatives Hate Hot Black Men









Comments

I think I prefer this cover of RG.

Mmmmmmmm sexy.

Posted by: Anna von Beav at December 17, 2010 10:08 AM

As an actual scientist, I can say I whole-heartedly support this endeavour in research.

My inner self ALSO wears a hat, but it's a 1920s great-gatsby style thing. She also falls over less.


Posted by: KJ at December 17, 2010 10:14 AM

My conclusion is, I like 'em a little dirty. Or a lot dirty. Yes.

It's not that I *don't* like 'em cleaned up, but there's something infinitely more interesting and, dare I say, manly about the dirty guy. like, what has he been *doing* to get so dirty? I know what suit guy's been doing, he's been primping like a woman, showering, blow-drying, dressing, putting on cologne, etc. But what has Johnny been doing there? A little gardening? Some murdering? I. Don't. Know. But I know I want his dirty hands on me. Ryan looks like he'd be afraid to wrinkle his suit. (I mean, I *know* he wouldn't be, but he just *looks* fussier.)

Same goes for scent. I already know what Ryan smells like. He smells like cologne or aftershave or some combination of those and hair product and soap and body lotion. Johnny looks, to me, like he smells of outdoors and manliness, which isn't necessarily the same as BO.

Posted by: Anna von Beav at December 17, 2010 10:16 AM

I don't care about Vanessa Paradis, the accent or the ever-present Gauloises, I will not believe Depp is living in France until he starts toting a little shoulder bag around. It's the only thing that sets the real french men apart from the wannabes.

Also, Ryan Gosling, oh how I wish I were younger and could feel less icky about lusting after you!

Posted by: PaddyDog at December 17, 2010 10:16 AM

Johnny Depp does indeed look like he smells very, very bad. I'm afraid he's going to have to get into into this here bathtub with me and clean his dirty self.

Posted by: stardust at December 17, 2010 10:25 AM

"When I was younger (so much younger than today),"...

I tried to keep singing the paragraph after that. It didn't really work out.

Posted by: Sean at December 17, 2010 10:27 AM

I like them in suits and ties, and very clean. Butthole clean.

The Mantese (TM, (c), patent pending) only works if the man is wearing a suit and tie (and optional cufflinks).

Posted by: BWeaves at December 17, 2010 10:32 AM

A little stubble does not denote manliness. Merely laziness.

Also, the odor you're detecting emanating from Depp is merely lust-reflection. Scientific fact.

Posted by: Wednesday at December 17, 2010 10:32 AM

JD looks like he would smell like fresh earth or sunshine or summer, not oil, grease, or BO. Me like.

RG (holy shit, is that really him?) looks like he smells of soap, freshly showered skin, and colonge. Me like.

I love 'em both.

Posted by: duckandcover at December 17, 2010 10:39 AM

My inner-self has a monocle and bonnet. The bonnet is blue and has some rad streamer ribbons on it, like those I used to have on my bike handlebars. My inner-self is bad-ass.

Now, as to the science. Depp does look dirty. But not that "Holy shit I just came from an audition for the movie version of Deadwood and they dipped me in real pig shit and prostitute excretions" dirty. No. The Depp Dirty is one of manliness. One that drives women of all ages and species into a frothing frenzy to, as AVB said, find out why he's dirty and whether or not he will join you in the shower for a full-body scrub.

Gosling is gorgeous. But he looks like he'd rather be dirty. Alas, the magazine was all, "Hey! Let's put him in a suit and carefully gelled hair and artistic photos representing the fact that his inner-self is preparing for a big dance number in Chicago!" Make no mistake, Gosling wants to be dirty. His inner-self is actually filthy under that hat. Of course, I'd let him into my boudoir either way. He's just sessy.

Posted by: Pinky McLadybits at December 17, 2010 10:43 AM

And if I find them both meh?

Ryan Gosling is a fantastic actor and I loved Lars and the Real Girl, but a lust object? He's old enough to be my nephew.

I don't get the Depp thing full stop. I think he is overrated as an actor and, despite an admittedly excellent nose, not that great looking. He does look like someone who is supposed to be uber-cool and great looking, but a little dangerous in a non-threatening* "it might involve silk scarves, but I'll keep you safe" kind of way.

Sidebar: The greatest line ever from Friends: You mean the [guy] who looks like a non-threatening Ray Liotta?

Posted by: Mrs. Julien at December 17, 2010 10:45 AM

P.S. My inner self wears one of those 1910s hats with a wide brim that sit very low over the eyes and has a swoop of egret feather.

Posted by: Mrs. Julien at December 17, 2010 10:48 AM

"Butthole clean"

I'm not entirely sure what this means, but I think it's dirty.

I think.

Posted by: Groundloop at December 17, 2010 10:49 AM

P.P.S. I have a picture somewhat like RG's profile shot from my wedding. It's great because the position of my arm is making my waist look tiny and my chest look fullsome. There's no hat though.

Posted by: Mrs. Julien at December 17, 2010 10:50 AM

@Groundloop - How ironic.

Posted by: Mrs. Julien at December 17, 2010 10:52 AM

Okay, I like 'em dirty too, but when I say 'dirty' I don't actually mean that I want them to be covered in actual dirt. I just don't think Hobo Johnny is Cute Johnny. But Gosling can "Hey girl!" me any time.

In other news, I love Joanna, she is my witty girlfriend.

Posted by: Katers at December 17, 2010 10:52 AM

I wore a hat for my wedding. A lovely over-the-top neo-Edwardian hat.

Posted by: PaddyDog at December 17, 2010 11:00 AM

And that is why I love you PaddyDog.

My dress was too 1870s Victorian for a chapeau such as the one I would have liked; indeed, one such as you have just described.

Posted by: Mrs. Julien at December 17, 2010 11:09 AM

My inner self wears a beanie. My outer self also wore one for a while in college but outgrew it.

Posted by: pickled tink at December 17, 2010 11:19 AM

Also, needs more Johnny.

Posted by: pickled tink at December 17, 2010 11:19 AM

My inner self keeps eating its hat. It says I don't feed him enough.

Posted by: Jim Doggie at December 17, 2010 11:43 AM

Jim, that's because you keep referring to it as "it".

My inner self wears a Darth Vader helmet. Also is Darth Vader.

Posted by: joker at December 17, 2010 11:52 AM

Just so we're clear: I'd totally get in a sandwich with these two men.

Also, my inner self doesn't need to wear a hat, because my outer self loves hats.

Posted by: Anna von Beav at December 17, 2010 11:53 AM

Love this. Love them both, but I agree that Ryan is someone I typically think of as dirty (and prefer him that way).

Posted by: Melissa at December 17, 2010 11:57 AM

When did I miss this math:

dirty+soulful eyes = Artiste

Posted by: Mrs. Julien at December 17, 2010 12:15 PM

This post demonstrates a true commitment to the experimental question. The subject matter is well-researched and fascinating, the overall topic is culturally relevant and current, and the innovative way of transforming the scientific method into a tool for social analysis is innovative and effective. It would seem, however, that the lack of firm conclusion demonstrates a strong need for more investigations in the same vein to be researched and reported here.

Posted by: esme at December 17, 2010 12:33 PM

Blargh, neither one.

Johnny Depp = drowned rat
Ryan Gosling = Droopy

So, while I heartily approve of the experiment and this delightful column, the specimens used are judged by me to be: meh. Conclusion: I win.

It's science.

Posted by: Figgy at December 17, 2010 2:01 PM

Also Gosling's eyes are making me dizzy in Fig2. They're completely off-set from each other and make his whole face look slanted. It's freaking me out, man.

Posted by: Figgy at December 17, 2010 2:17 PM

Butthole clean means exactly what it sounds like.

You have to wash your butthole area with soap and water and remove all clingons (klingons?) from the area orbiting Uranus, if you know what I mean and I think you do. Crud infused buttholes are a real turnoff.

Posted by: BWeaves at December 17, 2010 3:00 PM

Johnny looks like he smells like a Greek boy I used to date (read: bone) when living in Europe. He was fabulously sketchy, gorgeous, slightly dangerous and could charm the pants off of any woman alive. As such, I can say from experience that JD smells like musk-that's-not-quite-BO, cigarettes, whiskey, sex , mysteriousness and manliness. And a top note of some random cleaning product that only be found in the back alleys of Athens. And it's awesome.

Gosling is also very awesome, but in a way that makes me want to introduce him to my family. That's good too, but I'm guessing that the boning wouldn't be as raucous. I'd still do him.

Posted by: kalafraja at December 17, 2010 3:38 PM

"It's not that I *don't* like 'em cleaned up, but there's something infinitely more interesting and, dare I say, manly about the dirty guy. like, what has he been *doing* to get so dirty?"

I'm going to go with "not bathing" and "stewing in his own stoner funk for a week". Sexy, I know. Mrrowr.

Posted by: Craig at December 17, 2010 3:51 PM

Mmmmmm, Johnny Depp. You HAVE been a naughty NAUGHTY boy. I think this dirtiness needs closer inspection. I'll just start at the bottom and work my way up.

Posted by: Lindsey with an 'e' at December 17, 2010 3:52 PM

I have previously stated that I prefer my men of the very-clean-three piece suit-double Windsor knot-stiffly pressed shirt-with-cuff links variety. This meticulous scientific study only solidifies my preference.

Hmm, I guess I’ll be watching Inception tonight…

Posted by: Scully at December 17, 2010 3:52 PM

I vote for clean, simply because I live with a teenager (of the male persuasion) whose room (with windows closed, because of the weather) smells of dirty laundry and unwashed body. That's not naughty--it's merely gross.

Posted by: True_Blue at December 17, 2010 4:24 PM

There wasn't enough Tom Hardy in this study to be scientifically complete.

I don't get the appeal of Johnny Depp. Never have. Good in quirky roles, but now overplaying his shtick of "I'm too cool."

Gosling's a great actor, but he's a little mopey and apathetic and sometimes I look at him and I'm like, "Hey! You used to be Young Hercules!"

I think my inner self sports a nifty set of spats to keep up with the fedora.

Posted by: Parker at December 17, 2010 5:33 PM

Science needs to get on with proving how much more beautiful (and good in bed) nerds are than the rest of the population. You'd think they'd have some incentive

Posted by: The_wakeful at December 17, 2010 6:03 PM

I have nothing to add but "thank you."

And Ryan Gosling 4EVA! (My inner self is 13.)

Posted by: MelBivDevoe at December 17, 2010 6:17 PM

My fiance asks me, "Where is the cultural aspect to this study?" After prodding for a greater reason for her frustration she told me she just wished Idris Elba was used as a subject.

Posted by: Gamal at December 17, 2010 8:24 PM

Dude. Seriously. Does no one notice his totally mismatched eyes? Or am I the only one bothered by this? I must be. I can't stop thinking about it.

I need a new hobby.

Posted by: Figgy at December 17, 2010 11:51 PM

Pinky McLadybits, my dearest, due to this ONE SENTENCE "My inner-self has a monocle and bonnet. The bonnet is blue and has some rad streamer ribbons on it, like those I used to have on my bike handlebars." we are CLEARLY true sister-wives.

Would it work if I put RG's head on JD's filthy body? Is this something science allows?

Posted by: SPAGHATTA NADLE (formerly popejenn) at December 18, 2010 12:26 AM

I like all this science. I say we make more studies... with pictures. LOTS of pictures.

Posted by: Maggi at December 18, 2010 1:25 AM

SPAGHATTA NADLE, I always knew we were soul sister-wives. I love you. And I think we can do some experiments to see about putting RG's head on JD's body. BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAA!

Posted by: Pinky McLadybits at December 18, 2010 1:18 PM

Figgy, his eyes are... off in an odd way in that picture, and it bugs me immensely. However, that cannot detract from the overwhelming hotness, so I find that I am capable of overlooking it.

Posted by: Gabs at December 18, 2010 2:22 PM

My inner self has forgone hats for headbands with flowers and hair bows. Oh, wait, that's my outer self. She also still wears glasses because she thinks they make her look more cool (Dork! I kid because I love). My outer self is a bit jealous of the glasses thing, but both of them fancy the pants off Mr Gosling. And they would like to know if they could trade in Depp for Mitchell from Being Human.

Posted by: Kateshi Rinkichiku at December 18, 2010 4:42 PM

My inner self wears a bowler and smokes fat thigh-rolled Cuban cigars (as well as fat-thigh rolled ones). She also demands more science in the form of weekly experiments of this nature.
My outer self concurs heartily and, having gazed longingly at the JD images, is off to buy a cigar. A fat one.

Posted by: cinekat at December 20, 2010 8:43 AM