web
counter
 

A Final Look Back at the Decade that Was in Film

By Michael Murray | Posted Under Miscellaneous | Comments (14)



425.startrek.pine.cho.lc.032409.jpg

This New Year I found myself looking back over the last decade rather than the year that has just passed. Naturally, this included all the conventional lists, but as my memory is lame, this proved extraordinarily difficult. And so, my lists were composed not so much of what I thought was the best work of the decade, but the work that I best remembered.

Of course, that’s really what’s important, anyway. I mean, as individuals we should measure the success of a work of art not by any sort of intellectual or even comparative analysis, but how that work spoke to and affected each one of us. And so now, I look back at a few of my more significant cinematic experiences over the last decade.

In 2001, when the French film Amelie came out, it was an immediate romantic ideal. Unexpected, warm and beautiful, it suggested an incredible world of possibility that existed in the pedestrian landscapes of the everyday. And of course, Audrey Tautou was a stunning revelation—a beautiful synthesis of the unexpected inventiveness of Miranda July and the aesthetic of Audrey Hepburn. She was a perfect distillate of all our romantic aspirations—a somehow overlooked diamond-in-the-rough who was joyously alive and attendant to the world around her, her presence revealing the truth that yes, everything we want, actually wants us back.

I walked out of that movie theatre incredible hopeful, assured that love was waiting right around the corner.



Spirited Away came out in 2001 and at the time, I had never seen a Japanese Anime film. The truth was that I really didn’t know what Anime actually was, thinking it was some sort of weird hybrid between kiddie porn and Science Fistion.

What I saw in Spirited Away was gorgeous, strange and kind of disturbing. The movie unfolded in an eerie world that was prosaic and familiar, while being simultaneously dislocating and alien. It was dreamlike and spooky, and you never had any sort of certainty that there was going to be a happy ending, and although the movie didn’t exactly offer comfort, it did offer wonder. When I watched the melancholy passage of the ghost train transporting spirits across the water, I was completely awestruck, although I honestly can’t explain why.



When I went to see Werner Herzog’s 2005 film Grizzly Man, I was kind of expecting to see a comedic treatment of a ridiculous, if ultimately tragic life. And of course, the movie was funny, in a terribly bleak and lost way, but the story of Timothy Treadwell, for all the lunatic flourishes, was about a profoundly alienated person who just looking for some sort of role in a world in which he didn’t’ belong. And Herzog, in his unflinching way, held the camera past the point of performance, allowing us to see Treadwell’s descent into madness, as well as the indifference of the natural world to the vanities of man. It was a freak-out, that movie, the first Herzog film that I had ever seen, and as I walked out of the theater I stumbled upon a beautiful woman weeping on a bench, a mystery that I will forever twin with the experience of watching that film.

John Cameron Mitchell’s film Short Bus came out in 2006, and the only reason that I wanted to go see it was for the sex. Sook-Yin Lee, who was a Much Music (Canadian MTV) VJ and then a radio personality, was featured having hardcore sex in Short Bus, and that fact alone was sufficient to pique my interest. And of course, it was an art house film, which somehow served to validate the masculine instinct to porn. Yes, so my reasons for attending the movie were entirely superficial, and I expected no more engagement from it than I would from a video clip from a porn site.

However, Short Bus turned out to be an astonishing and uplifting movie. Amidst the cacophony of sex and ejaculate, was a truly touching and redemptive story, one that joyously celebrated human connectivity. And so, when I cynically attended what I thought was going to be a mechanical and lifeless pageant of sex, I was utterly floored and delighted to discover a funny and jubilant film about forgiveness and love.

Like everybody else, I went and saw the Star Trek prequel in 2009. In spite of all the critical praise it had been receiving, I didn’t really expect to like it, but about half way through the film, I realized that I had a big, sloppy grin sliding all over my face. And then, shortly after realizing that, something completely unanticipated happened, I began to feel emotional.

I certainly don’t consider myself a Trekkie, but in one form or another, the cast of the original show, have always been present in my life, and in a weird way, they’re like old, friends of my parents. They were an adult presence that was always around, and I guess I kind of felt like they were watching me grow up—like my parent’s friends— just as I was watching them age.

Over the years, they’ve cycled in and out of favor, often being replaced by newer, cooler versions. The show became a camp classic, and it became positively embarrassing to watch the aging and portly actors running about in Federation uniforms that had been designed specifically to disguise their paunches.

The new Star Trek movie propelled us all back to a time before our own cultural consciousness, reconfiguring the crew as vigorous and ambitious. We got to see a glimpse of them before they were defined, before they were set in our minds forever. For me, it was like watching my parents, before they became my parents, when they had lives and identities that were their very own.

The actors who played Scotty and Bones in the original have passed away, just as some of the old friends of the family have, too. The movie made me think of my parent’s and their generation of friends, of all the people who went through officer’s training and nursing school n the 60’s with them, and the kinship and camaraderie that they shared for decades after, as they watched over and protected one another’s children and grandchildren. The movie called them all back to me, and I saw my parent’s fallen friends—Blair Rogers, Bernie O’Neil, Norm Pascoe—written in the cast of the Star Trek crew, back before I knew them, when they were beautiful lions just setting out to try to realize their as yet unblemished fields of potential.

Michael Murray is a freelance writer. For the last three and a half years he’s written a weekly column for the Ottawa Citizen about watching television. He presently lives in Toronto. You can find more of his musings on his blog, or check out his Facebook page.









Will Smith and Denzel Washington Attached to Uptown Saturday Night Remake | Pajiba Love 01/04/10













Comments

weird hybrid between kiddie porn and Science Fistion

I love this typo.

Posted by: Bistro at January 4, 2010 12:10 PM

That scene from Amelie brought tears to my eyes. The idea of helping people for the sake of helping them moves me.

Posted by: Alexandra at January 4, 2010 12:32 PM

Spirited Away gave me the same sensation I get with modern art in that I'm not sure if I'm stupid and missing the point or if the artist is having fun at my expense.

Posted by: Tracer Bullet at January 4, 2010 1:19 PM

I was right there with you till you mentioned everyone seeing Star Trek. I didn't, and I don't intend to, either. I can't even get through a full episode of any incarnation of this series, let alone a feature film.

Shortbus is a great film, though. Glad to see someone else finally mentioning it in a decade round-up.

Posted by: Robert at January 4, 2010 1:29 PM

I always thought DeForrest Kelley's tombstone should have read: "I'm dead, Jim".

.....too soon?

Posted by: Odnon at January 4, 2010 3:57 PM

Adding Short Bus to my library queue. Searching around to see if Le Fabuleux Destin d'Amélie Poulain (and you call yourself a Canadian!) is out on Blu-ray.

Posted by: Poultice at January 4, 2010 4:08 PM

Me too, Bistro. Science fistion is my favorite genre. Hell, anything fistion is my favorite genre.

Posted by: John Denver's Wingman at January 4, 2010 4:34 PM

Michael Murray, I have a fever and the only cure is more Denys Arcand!

Posted by: Agente Provocatrice at January 4, 2010 7:00 PM

Michael, your reasons for liking Star Trek are beautiful. I more or less grew up with TOS, TNG and DS9 despite the campyness of it all. Abrams re-work isn't good because it's got an enticing story (it has not), but because the actors are so damn good (except Zoe Saldana). They are faithful to the originals, while bringing in their own style. I got reminded of the "good old times" watching TOS with my family.

Hell, they got Nimoy to perform in this movie and even praising it. If it wasn't good, the man would not have said so. He has no need to do that.

Oh, and BSlim: Stay the fuck out of here. No one wants to hear your whining.

Posted by: FabMax at January 4, 2010 9:01 PM

Hey! I rented Star Trek this weekend too, not expecting to enjoy it much, what with the younger stars and all, but I ended up enjoying it as well, pretty much for the same type of reasons as you. As reboots go, it was a bang up job. But then again, it did have JJ Abrams as director, and his stuff is generally high on my list of things to see. he makes the wierd and wacky Fringe (?) after all.

Posted by: d at January 4, 2010 10:23 PM

Ash shoon ash you notish Loenard Nimoy'sh deshperate
attemptsh to shpeak around his ill-fitting denturesh, thish
new Shtar Trek becomesh an unroarioush shpace comedy.
[Oh, also, I highly recommend the RiffTrax commentary.]

Posted by: Poultice at January 4, 2010 10:37 PM

Thanks MM this is a really touching piece. I wasn't expecting to get all teary eyed, but you were able to put your finger on what was so great about all of these films. The bit about Star Trek as your parents friends is a perfect metaphor and my favorite part.

I've always had a place in my heart for Star Trek because unlike Star Wars (I love them equally), ST is not in a galaxy far away, it takes place in this one, it is our most idealistic version of the future. I thank Roddenberry for giving people the picture of what we should be working towards as a race, and I thank Abrams for giving a new generation that same picture.
Sniff, watching it in the theatre was so emotional, sharing it with my sons made me a big mushy sentimental mess.

Thanks again Michael, I really enjoyed reading this.

Posted by: Mebe at January 5, 2010 4:13 AM

Great piece, but other than your inclusion of Shortbus, what's Canadian about it? Why is it "a Canadian perspective" instead of just one man's perspective? I won't complain about this if someone can point me to another "a [nationality] perspective" post on this site, other than TK's review of Invictus, because in that case his South African-ness was actually relevant. It just sounds like another Canadian insisting no no no, we're different, when nobody asked in the first place and it just makes us sound insecure. Because dude, we are different. Just let it be. People will notice, okay? And yes -- I AM ONE OF YOU.

Posted by: J. K. Barlow at January 5, 2010 5:44 AM

Exactly right about Star Trek! Exactly! Thank you for putting that into words. I'm officially stealing that bit for myself because nobody I know visits this site.

Posted by: malechai at January 5, 2010 11:39 AM


















Viral Hits

>> Pajiba Movie Posters

>> Pop Culture's 20 Greatest Dancing GIFs

>> Mindhole Blowers

>> The 100 Greatest Insults of All Time

>> The "Other" 100 Greatest Movie Quotes

>> The 100 Greatest Movie Threats of All Time

>> The Sean Bean Death Reel

>> Chicks Dig Beards: It's Science

>> The Coolest TV Show Title Sequences

>> The Most Rewatchable Movies

>> The Most Expensive Movies of All Time