![]()
Hitman / Phillip Stephens
In spite of the dreaded “based on a video game” tagline that dogs Hitman, the truth is — it ain’t that bad. To the degree that French director Xavier Gens can recall his fellow countrymen’s treatment of the same subject: the lone wolf assassin who’s impeccable at killing and completely crippled in any emotional context; Melville’s Le Samourai and Besson’s (who produced here) Leon come most immediately to mind. To the extent that Gens evokes these films and explores their essential relationships, he succeeds; to the extent that he duplicates video game aesthetics, he merely entertains; to the extent that he tries to balance the two, he fails.
The credit sequence montage introduces us to an organization colorfully known as the Agency, which breeds, trains, and brands a troupe of peerless assassins-for-hire, each known by the barcode tattooed to their bald skulls. We then follow Agent 47 (Timothy Olyphant), as he perpetrates a few global assassinations, tracked unceasingly by an Interpol agent named Mike (Dougray Scott). After a high-profile assignment, eliminating the Russian president (Ulrich Thomsen), is apparently botched, 47 is set upon by the Russian Secret Service, Interpol, and his former employers.
The interesting parts of Hitman aren’t 47 unraveling the political conspiracy that set him up or the violence which punctuates his encounters with these opposing forces, but his interactions with Nika (Olga Kurylenko), a forced prostitute targeted for elimination by the same cabal on 47’s heels; he unwittingly gets stuck with Nika, strangely unable to kill or discard her as the situation dictates. The pair form an unlikely bond — Nika is weirdly allured to 47’s man-child, his immaculate proficiency as a killer and his complete haplessness to her sexual come-ons. It’s too bad that Olyphant can’t match this chemistry; in many ways, he was totally wrong for this role. I’ve seen Timothy Olyphant play a lot of things exceptionally well: rage, sleaziness, sheer sexual confidence; but 47’s enigma doesn’t really encompass these, and Olyphant doesn’t try to make them, merely peddling the rote emotions each situations calls for without the charisma necessary to make his performance compelling.
Aside from these all-too-brief flirtations, Hitman is, of course, an action piece above all else. These vignettes are interesting, if lacking in tension (the film makes no bones about 47 being completely invincible). I haven’t played the Eidos game, so I can’t testify to how fans will react, but many of the action sequences look like aesthetic nods to the source material. The film’s pace keeps things zipping along at an even-keel, save for the brief attempts at character development, but this is largely a paint-by-numbers, silly actioner. Too bad, because as strange as it sounds, Hitman does flirt with something more.
Phillip Stephens is the lead critic for Pajiba. He lives in Fayetteville, AR, and does not give two shits about the Razorbacks.
August Rush | | Mist, The
Comments
I don't know. I just couldn't get into it. I caught my attention, but when the topless scenes started to come in for the sake of having a hot girl half naked on screen, I started to lose interest. It went from possibly having surprising depth (like Shoot'Em Up, which I still feel bad for liking so much) to being a bland gun action film. The flat lead performances didn't help, either. It was like cookie cutter characters that other actors have made careers out of playing, but they were too busy not making video game adaptations to care.
Considering it was a video game adaptation, it was good for what it was. It actually kind of makes me want to play the game, even though it's the kind of game I fail miserably at.
I still haven't beaten Golden Eye on the N64, and don't think I haven't been trying.
Posted by: Robert at November 21, 2007 9:36 PM
WOO HOO FUCK YEAH!
It's R rated
Prostitute gets naked, a lot.
These are all the things I need to know.
* Still think this is the role Jason Statham was built for.
Posted by: BarbadoSlim at November 21, 2007 10:19 PM
Damn. I'm completely in love with Seth Bullock, and I'm bummed that Olyphant isn't as good in this movie as he was in Deadwood. Cocksucker!
Posted by: Aldogg at November 21, 2007 10:39 PM
Never watched Deadwood, and I've never had a problem with Olyphant as an actor (man alive, is he skinny, though). That said, I've never thought of him action star material, so the moment I saw the trailer I knew I wouldn't see it. If you're bland as hell in the trailer, methinks it's not getting much better in the movie.
Thus, I must agree with BSlim - Statham would have been a much better fit. He's mostly bald anyway, so it wouldn't have been too much of a stretch. Besides, anytime Statham is on the big screen (shirtless, preferably), it's a good day.
Posted by: Daphne at November 21, 2007 11:44 PM
Seth Bullock is a prick.
Posted by: Toothed Varmint at November 22, 2007 3:17 AM
He lives in Fayetteville, AR, and does not give two shits about the Razorbacks.
Hooo-eee, you said it brother. Although I'm happy they'll be providing some cannon fodder to the pros next year with McFadden and Felix.
Casting Statham could be problematic because he's already playing this role in the Transporter movies. Isn't this basically the same "one invincible guy versus an army of bad guys" motif? Heck, they may have offered it to him, but I think he's trying not to get pigeon-holed into that role -- and it may already be too late.
But I can see why Olyphant would be problematic as well. That skeezy thug from Go? Convincing and hilarious. That skeezy thug from The Girl Next Door? Convincing, hilarious, and scary. Secret Agent Man? Not so much.
Posted by: socalledonlycousins at November 22, 2007 10:36 AM
Dammit, I so badly wanted to like this movie.
I thought they were going to cast a nobody as 47. I am a bit disappointed that they chose Timothy Olyphant, even though he's so deliciously good in Deadwood he just doesn't fit the bill in this case.
Posted by: REW at November 22, 2007 11:59 AM
Now I have a desperate hankering to see Le Samourai again. Oh, ice cold Delon. Classic.
Posted by: Rebecca H. at November 22, 2007 12:07 PM
this movie was terrible. awful. this is one of my favorite video games and I wanted so badly for this movie to be great. I saw it with my husband and my brother, all of us love the videogame, all of us left the movie theater groaning at how terrible this movie was. the dialogue seemed as if it was written by someone who has never had a real conversation before. the story was completely off what the videogame is. some of the aesthetic was almost spot on, but.. oh what a disappointment. i came on here to enjoy what I thought was going to be a bashing, and this movie got a "ain't that bad" review?? I'm shocked. Shocked!
Posted by: kam at November 22, 2007 1:46 PM
kam: There's also gambling at Rick's. I know, I couldn't believe it either.
Posted by: socalledonlycousins at November 22, 2007 2:21 PM
"I haven't played the Eidos game, so I can't testify to how fans will react, but many of the action sequences look like aesthetic nods to the source material."
Well, the games aren't at all about action, but rather about careful planning, timing and staying unnoticed. He's an assassin, you know. Piano wire > AK-47.
Posted by: Hakobus at November 22, 2007 5:46 PM
As a die-hard fan of the video-game series, I'm ignoring the reviews and planning to see this flick on Saturday. And yet I can't shake this deep sense of foreboding upon seeing the explosions and gunfire in the commercials that the screenwriter didn't bother with the actual game.
You think someone would've noticed that the gist of the game is to assassinate the target without making a lot of noise.
Posted by: Dr. Haus at November 22, 2007 6:14 PM
I liked the idea of the policeman from District 13 as 47. Can't remember his name... s'late... mumble... mumble... snooze...
Posted by: zarahruth at November 22, 2007 6:42 PM
BarbadoSlim: I had that exact same thought when i first heard they were making it. Statham would have been perfect in this role if he'd kept the accent low (not gone though).
I haven't seen this one yet, as it probably won't be out for a while (damn Australia) down here, but it looks like it has a lot of shooting in it. Please tell me this isn't the case! Whenever i played the games i always restarted a level as soon as i had to make a shot, and most of my friends did the same. The genius of it was in the manipulation of the environment to make the hit look like an accident, does any of this translate to the screen?
Posted by: Chugga at November 22, 2007 8:12 PM
Wait a minute. Jason Statham isn't in this?
I have been seeing posters for this ALL OVER the nyc subway for the last, I don't know, 2 months at least, and I was totally convinced that Jason Statham was the star. I guess I just imagined that? Have I progressed to full-on Hollywood-casting hallucinations? Is this in the DSM IV?
This is incredibly disorienting. Seriously. I feel like the foundations of my world have been shaken.
Anyway, that said, I don't think I'll be seeing this one. The feminist in me gets riled up every time I pass an ad featuring a barely-clad woman's ass and spread legs. Which means a) she gets riled up a hell of a lot; and b) she gets riled up over Hitman posters approximately every five minutes. Because - did I mention the posters are everywhere?
Posted by: alanna at November 23, 2007 12:10 PM
Maybe I should add that I'm not trying to start a discussion of the feminist merit of the film and/or its advertising here. It just irritates me.
As you were.
Posted by: alanna at November 23, 2007 12:12 PM
Listen honey, let's not talk about the feminist and her quest for a peckerless society.
Posted by: Pookie at November 23, 2007 4:10 PM
The other thing with the game was that Hitman was cool. Timothy Olyphant, bless him, just isn't cool enough to pull it off.
Posted by: Tina at November 23, 2007 5:18 PM
I have a feeling it "wasn't that bad" because you came in with very lowly expectations (based on a video game no doubt had a part in that, and rightfully so). It might be an "okay" movie...However, let me warn all of you out there that actually played the game...you'll likely hate it. Like 99% of all movies based on games, it has nothing to do with the game. They took the outfit, a couple themes of the game and some aesthetics, and that's it.
Posted by: daeyeth at November 23, 2007 11:28 PM
There's only one 47, and his name is David Bateson. He literally is 47; the character's likeness was built around him. Bad casting choices aside, I sincerely hope they didn't turn him into a mindless killing machine. I always got the impression from the games that he had a bit of a suave demeanor.
Posted by: Duke at November 24, 2007 1:03 AM
Me and the bf caught a matinee today. He's a big fan of the games and we both liked it enough we've decided to buy it upon release. The good far outweighed the bad: the lead actress was abominable even when naked. But what can you expect when no one thinks a movie will fly without a love interest? Ugh.
As far as homages to the game, they were present and numerous but not overt or obvious. If they do a sequel, my bf thinks they should investigate the background of 47 a bit more. I don't think the movie should have followed the game because then why see the flick? I already know the storyline. This way, the film will possibly intro ppl to the game.
Posted by: hoorah at November 24, 2007 3:57 AM

