sex_and_the_city_2_poster_h.jpg

Guides | January 29, 2010 | Comments (54)


As we look back on the first year of a new decade, it appears as though nothing much has changed — at least yet — in the wake of the success of 2009’s Avatar. The ten worst movies of 2010 had nothing to do with advancements in 3D technology and almost everything to do with Hollywood’s insistence on cashing in with quick sequels, reboots, and remakes, as most of this year’s worst efforts were just an extension of groundwork laid in previous years. Lightning rarely strikes twice in the same place, but if it did, I wish Sarah Jessica Parker were standing underneath it.

At any rate, before we look at the anal bon mots that theaters have in store for us in 2011, let’s take one last look back at the shit-shower that rained upon us in 2010.

sex-and-the-city-2.jpgSex and the City 2: Back in May, the women of SaTC returned one more time before being shuttled off to the nursing home and forgotten about by their friends and family. The painfully empty plot aside, it was hard to take the movie seriously, even as a 90-minute fashion advertisement, as it’s hard to find anything credible about watching four women hobble around in high-heels well past an age where they should be wearing track suits and playing canasta. Everyone broke up again, only to return to each other before the final credits rolled, a cycle that’s been repeated three or four times now over the course of the series and now, the movies. The entire experience was predictable, hollow, artificial, and filmed with so much soft lighting that I actually left the movie squishier than when I went in.

twilight_eclipse_titletreatment-550x391.jpgThe Twilight Saga: Eclipse: Ugh. David Slade (Hard Candy, 30 Days of Night) was an interesting choice for the third Twilight film, but Summit doesn’t allow even its more talented directors to show their stuff. They’ve got a formula for these Twilight movies — slow pacing, lots of overacting, cringe-worthy dialogue, and cheap special effects — that’s worked consistently, and hell if they’re going to let a director’s own sensibility get in the way. Eclipse was as predictably painful to watch as it was predictably successful, and if Kristen Stewart keeps at the lip biting, she’s going to gnaw that goddamn thing off. Her bottom lip is like Kerri Russell’s hair in “Felicity.” The franchise wouldn’t be the same without it. The sadder news here is that Eclipse also triggered that tragedy back in August, when a theater full of jilted Team Jacobs in Utah drank the Kool-Aid en masse and left room full of corpses for the ushers to contend with. The good news for the deceased, however, is that they won’t have to suffer through a fourth movie.

meettheparents-440x293.jpgMeet the Little Fockers: How this movie passed for a comedy is beyond mortal understanding. It was uvula-ticklingly insufferable to watch Robert De Niro, Dustin Hoffman, and even Harvey Keitel humiliate themselves for money they don’t have enough years left in them to spend, Ben Stiller continued to self-immolate for the enjoyment of families with the collective IQ of a severed (focking) head, and of course, there were 217 more jokes that we didn’t need about the Focker surname. But with another $250 million in the bank, we can probably look forward to yet another Fockers movie — let’s call it, Shut the Fock Up, Already.

JadenSmith_KarateKid.jpgKarate Kid: I didn’t think it was possible to dumb down the original Karate Kid movie, but give Harald Zwart some credit for plumbing the depths of stupidity to come up with a hip-hop version with all the charm of chemical castration. Just how menacing could a bunch of 11-year-old punks look, swatting each other around with all the force of a stifled sneeze? Jaden Smith was nearly unwatchable — he looked like a karate-chopping snot-nosed Lilliputian you just wanted to pick up and flick away, while poor Jackie Chan seemed like he was Bowfingered into the movie after he forgot to tell the filmmakers that he’d already retired. Dude was just sitting around his Hollywood mansion swatting flies, and the next thing you know, it’s become part of a major motion picture.

let-me-in-poster-usa-01.jpgLet Me In: Matt Reeves delivered what he promised he’d give us: An “Americanization” of Let the Right One In. Who needs a creepy mysterious vampire girl when you can have a cute, twee one who delivers more bad one-liners than an afternoon at an ’80s action-hero convention. Creepiness is always better with a bigger budget, right? Smoke machines! Shaky cam! An amped up score! You gotta admit, though, that using this song for the big climactic scene was something of a stroke of genius, huh?



425.ParanormalActivity2.cm.102509.jpgParanormal Activity 2: Rushed together from script to the screen in only a matter of months, the producers behind Paranormal Activity 2 thought if they could just throw enough money around, they could completely short-cut the filmmaking process. And it showed. They replaced slow pacing and creepiness with REALLY LOUD NOISES and an actual boogeyman, and apparently tried to duplicate the low-budget effect of the first movie by just tossing a camera down a flight of stairs and putting the results on screen. The best thing about Paranormal Activity II, in fact, was the controversy surrounding the marketing strategy. In an attempt to replicate the man-on-the-street hype of the first film, it was uncovered that Paramount actually paid people to piss their pants and come out to give their Average Joe reviews in urine-soaked jeans. Indeed, like the adverts, Paranormal Activity was a pee-drenched sham.

paul_blart_mall_cop_movie_image_kevin_james__2_.jpgZookeeper: Kevin James’ movie might have gotten credit for being one of the few movies on this list that was neither a sequel, a remake, or based on a television show, except for the fact that it was basically Paul Blart: Mall Cop set in a zoo. But what’s the one thing you could do to actually make Mall Cop worse? Talking animals, of course. Why limit yourself to one walking fat-ass fart joke, when you can extend that joke to a monkey, a bear, a lion, and even an elephant (oh, Apatow — how could you voice the elephant?). And congratulations, Rosario Dawson, for breaking the record for man-boob jokes by a love interest. Chris Farley just rolled over in his grave. And then did another line of coke.

yogibear-1.jpgYogi Bear: It was an even numbered year, so there was no Alvin and the Chipmunks live-action rodent abortion to dazzle us, and thus we were treated to more of Anna Faris’ downward spiral into the swamp of shame. Even the last two decades of Dan Akyroyd’s career couldn’t prepare us for what has become of the man, who voiced Yogi Bear, along with Justin Timberlake (as Boo Boo). It wasn’t just Hollywood that was dumber than the average bear in 2010; Yogi Bear — released last month — is on course (as of this writing) to cross the $200 million mark in a matter of days, putting parents in the same IQ range. What a giant pic-a-nic basket of suck.


cop-out-1a.jpgCop Out: In addition to making 2010’s list of worst movies of the year, this one actually stung the most, as a respected and admired director, in Kevin Smith, was responsible. Cop Out is what happens when mainstream studio machinations get hold of a Kevin Smith dick joke: They turn it into a flaccid three-inch member incapable of penetrating a jar of SPAM jelly. It was a goddamn embarrassment, and represents what is probably Kevin Smith 2.0: Corporate Bob. Smith couldn’t even bother to phone the movie in — he was too busy smoking a fattie to pick up his goddamn cell. Cop Out was like a broken vibrator — a completely useless facsimile of the real thing not even capable of pulling your hair.

movie-five_killers-stills-1293951987.jpgKillers: What would a worst-of list be without at least one entry from Katherine Heigl, who actually was responsible for two awful movies in 2010 (the other, last month’s Life As We Know It, opposite Josh Lucas). What’s worse than a movie starring Rainbow Killer? How about one where she stars opposite Ashton Kutcher? You want to know what hell looks like on the big screen? Look no further than Killers, which tried (and failed) to blend that funky Heigl romantic comedy energy into an action pic, but forgot to hire an action director. Robert Luketic (21, The Ugly Truth) knows nothing about filmmaking beyond hiring pretty faces and shedding bright lights on them. Indeed, Killers was so awful that it actually wilted co-star Tom Selleck’s mustache.


The 100 Cheesiest Quotes of All Time | The Best Movies of 2010







Comments

This seems frighteningly accurate. Where did you get this information? Have you been lunching with The Akinator?

Posted by: becks at January 27, 2010 3:14 PM

*sigh*

Suddenly, stage 4 cancer seems like a good option.

Unfortunately, I don't have stage 4, I probably have the extremely curable kind and will only lose my hair. These movies would make me lose my mind.

*sigh*

Posted by: , at January 27, 2010 3:18 PM

Make it a top 11 and include Valentine's Day.

Posted by: Johnny at January 27, 2010 3:20 PM

Wow "," Sorry you have cancer, but for those of us with family members who do have stage 4 TERMINAL INCURABLE cancer that was a pretty upsetting thing to read. I'm pretty sure my mom would rather watch a string of really insufferable movies than, you know, die.

That's all.

Posted by: REALLY? at January 27, 2010 3:27 PM

Where's that fucking "sarcmark" when you need it?

Posted by: Jadine at January 27, 2010 3:32 PM

Why such resentment for Sex & the City?

Is it the characters ages and the fact that they still indulge in sexual activities or because the plotlines are trivial.

If it's the first, quite sexist I think and second, it's not the worst franchise.

Posted by: Jean at January 27, 2010 3:37 PM

You just had to use that picture up top, huh?

Coooooold.

Posted by: Jay at January 27, 2010 3:37 PM

Katherine Heigl and Kelso in the same movie?

That's like filling a bullet with poison, or lacing a hemlock pie with antifreeze based-cream. You don't get anything by adding a guaranteed bomb onto another bigger guaranteed bomb. This isn't like multiplying two negative numbers, people.

Why does this movie sound like the afterbirth of that Cruise/Diaz movie? Hmmm....

Posted by: D-Day at January 27, 2010 3:47 PM

I hope A Couple of Dicks makes a buttload of cash. Kev deserves it.
Fuck the haters.

Posted by: Optimus Rhyme at January 27, 2010 3:47 PM

You forgot:

Star Trek 2: The Wrath of Gene Roddenberry's Raped Ghost

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at January 27, 2010 3:53 PM

For me, the scariest thing about this post is I had to keep reminding myself that these are actual movies which were actually made.

Posted by: Melodie at January 27, 2010 3:55 PM

I can't believe Valentines Day doesn't make the cut.

Posted by: Nate at January 27, 2010 4:06 PM

Actually Slim, I believe that comes out in 2012.

Posted by: Skewicide Blonde at January 27, 2010 4:12 PM

Oh fuck I forgot about let me in.

Posted by: Steph at January 27, 2010 4:13 PM

Surely Star Trek 2 wont make it to cinema this year? It took them almost two and half years to put that much lens flare onto celluloid.

Still didn't G-Rod get shot into space like Doohan? So in a couple of decades he'll be back wearing a bathrobe and saving the whales. Probably only works for vulcans though.

Posted by: jim of the lower case at January 27, 2010 4:14 PM

Just remind me to go nowhere near the SATC review page when it arrives. I'll probably be a little bit curious but....NO...use force if necessary.

Posted by: Jay at January 27, 2010 4:20 PM

Actually Slim, I believe that comes out in 2012.

Posted by: Skewicide Blonde at January 27, 2010 4:12 PM
----------------------------------------

Let's include it on this list anyway, you know, just in case.

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at January 27, 2010 4:26 PM

Bad movies aside, that "nursing home" remark about women in their early to mid forties (or early fifties) who still look better then most people their age (and most people period when it comes to Kristin Davis) is... sexist? Ageist maybe? Whatever it is, it doesn`t help my quater-life crisis freakout about my "shelf date" at all.

But that`s probably just me being my oversensitive self. After all, I`m the 6`1 tall girl who feels worthless and ugly every time Kloe Kardashian or Brooke Hogan are called giants or trannies.

Posted by: Jae at January 27, 2010 4:41 PM

It is thoroughly depressing to see how much crap is headed our way. It is a veritable Johnstown Flood of fecal matter.

Posted by: Jelinas at January 27, 2010 4:42 PM

I had entirely blocked Let Me In from my memory. Fuck you very much for the reminder.

Posted by: trippdup at January 27, 2010 4:59 PM

Wait, are these real movies?

Posted by: pianofilledwithflames at January 27, 2010 5:22 PM

Wow Dustin - offensive much? I totally agree with your thought that S&TC 2 will be a horrendous blemish on the face of mankind (similar to the way S&TC 1 was) but "track suits"? "Canasta"? The oldest of these women is Kim Cattrall who ranks in at a 'decrepit' 53, with SJP and Kristin David coming in at 44, and Cynthia Nixon 43. The Golden Girls cast this is not.

Posted by: vleigh at January 27, 2010 5:37 PM

I think I'm trying too hard to be perceived as a smart parent. I read the review of Yogi Bear above as:

"...is on course (as of this writing) to cross the $200 million mark in a matter of days, putting parents in the same IQ range."

and thought "Wow. Maybe I should take my kid to see Yogi Bear so I can fit in with all the 200 IQ folks. I wonder what it is about this movie that would appeal to smart parents?"

Then read it again and realized that I don't have any business trying to hang out with the smart parents. (and good riddance if they're all watching Yogi Bear anyway!)

Posted by: Gentleman Farmer at January 27, 2010 5:37 PM

Ooooh, so much resentment for Star Trek...I stand as one of few excited for the sequel, lens flare and all. And I'm going to predict that Cop Out will be a pleasant surprise, which will help wash away any generic aftertaste that awfully bland trailer left behind.

Posted by: Professional Citizen at January 27, 2010 6:15 PM

I was going to gently express that I thought it was a little harsh to insinuate that a bunch of gals not much more than a decade older than me ought to be wearing little-old-lady tracksuits, but I see folks have that covered. Besides, I half suspect you slipped that in there just to get a rise out of us sandy vaginae, you silly punk!

So instead, I will say this: *shudder* Zookeeper? Is this movie really necessary? Ugh.

Posted by: meaux at January 27, 2010 6:16 PM

And I'm stealing "uvula-ticklingly insufferable." So there.

Posted by: meaux at January 27, 2010 6:23 PM

Wow Dustin - offensive much? I totally agree with your thought that S&TC 2 will be a horrendous blemish on the face of mankind (similar to the way S&TC 1 was) but "track suits"? "Canasta"? The oldest of these women is Kim Cattrall who ranks in at a 'decrepit' 53, with SJP and Kristin David coming in at 44, and Cynthia Nixon 43. The Golden Girls cast this is not.

Posted by: vleigh at January 27, 2010 5:37 PM

If it was the Golden Girls cast it would be on a "Most Awesome Movies" list instead of this one.

Posted by: angie at January 27, 2010 6:24 PM

I'm sure Valentine's Day will be on the real list at the end of the year. The trailers alone make me want to set things on fire.

Posted by: figgy at January 27, 2010 6:29 PM

What's up with all the nursing home references when it comes to Sex in the City?

I mean, these (fictional, I know) women aren't even out of there 40s are they? Why are we trying to wheel them into nursing homes already? What the what?

I would throw out a sexism charge, but it's just SitC so I'll feel weird defending fake, one-dimensional characters. I just hope the idea that any real life woman needs to close up her vagina and go away after reaching a relatively young age isn't seeping into the minds of little boys (or girls) anywhere.

Posted by: kayla at January 27, 2010 6:48 PM

Okay, I didn't see Jean, vleigh, or meau's posts before I posted.

But I just wanted to add that I agree with angie.

Posted by: kayla at January 27, 2010 6:52 PM

"Let the Right One In" is a perfect title. "Let Me In" sounds like porn.

Posted by: Thurgod at January 27, 2010 7:13 PM

K, I thought I would be the only elderly person bitching about the age references in any discussion of "Sex and the City," but am glad to see I'm not.

Hey, people in your 20s and 30s:
You know, most of you don't look that hot, either, and these are your prime hotness years. So there's that to start with.

Second, the sad thing about the Sex and the City movie is that there is a market for a movie that's mostly about shopping for extremely expensive clothing. And also that the neurotic "heroine" character (Carrie) is really not much of a role model. She buys expensive shit and mopes around. And adult women pay to see this. That's the part that's really icky and discouraging. That adult women have nothing better to aspire to than shopping and whining about their love life. They may as well be teenagers. Maybe it's their way of pretending they're not aging.

Also: when are we going to see a review that points out how much older the male lead is than the woman he's boinking and how icky it is to contemplate a man porking a woman young enough to be his granddaughter? I can't remember the last time I read something like that here.

And before any dude chimes in with "Men age better than women," I will respond: No, they don't. They only think they do, because most of their female age cohort are so desperate, they'll overlook the baldness, fatness, bad breath and general decrepitude. For every flabby, haggard-looking woman in her 40s and beyond, there's at least one equally flabby and haggard-looking old dude.

Posted by: Slash at January 27, 2010 7:33 PM

Yeah, men don't age any better than women.

I think it's just an evolutionary thing. Men can generally conceive longer than we can. Our eggs die out before their peens tire out. So they're biologically viable for a longer period of time.

That's probably why when women reach the age when they can become menopausal, the nursing home bull comes out. Just another way to perpetuate that silly myth about men aging better.

Posted by: kayla at January 27, 2010 7:49 PM

Holy shit, apparently every commenter on here doesn't understand exaggeration for humor's sake. Saying that the SaTC girls need to be in a nursing home is funny, saying "yeah they're sort of middle aged and not that cute anymore, i guess?" is boring and lame

Posted by: Jason H. at January 27, 2010 7:59 PM

I think people understand that "they're sort of middle aged and not that cute anymore" is the message, couched in hyperbolic terms. However, some people object to that message. I don't care for it, myself.

Posted by: skye at January 27, 2010 8:25 PM

Eek! Someone needs to tell little American vampire girl that LEGGINGS ARE NOT PANTS.

Not cool.
Not cool.

Posted by: Erin S at January 27, 2010 8:31 PM

In the header picture, is SJP supposed to look like she's transforming into Dr. Manhattan? Because I don't get it.

"Let the Right One In" is a perfect title. "Let Me In" sounds like porn.

What about "Let the Right Ones In"? Orgy!

Posted by: SaBrina at January 27, 2010 8:40 PM

"Let Me In" makes me think of a cat. Felines have yet to find a door they wouldn't prefer to be on the other side of.

Posted by: Lauren at January 27, 2010 9:16 PM

Ha, just imagine the sequel, Lauren:

"Let Me In 2: Let Me Back Out Now."

Posted by: meaux at January 27, 2010 9:30 PM

"Let Me In 3: Okay, Now Let Me In Again."

Posted by: meaux at January 27, 2010 9:38 PM

@REALLY?: I'm sorry about your mum, truly. I've seen too many people have to fight that demon and I'm damned sick of it. Be well, buddy.

@Jae: Can't win, you know? For every 6'1 'tranny' (perish the word), there's a 5'0 'midget', 'stump' or 'troll' clasped in the decolletaged talons of a capricious little goblin I like to call 'Lactemia'. It looks weird, so it's a good thing that chicks have other things going for them. At any rate, I'm not sure if I know a girl who isn't walking around fending off her own barrage. Fuck them! And if they give you shit, punch 'em in the tooth. Then punch them again for me, because I can't reach up to 'regular human people size'.

Posted by: Jo 'Mama' Besser at January 27, 2010 9:47 PM

REALLY? - truly sorry to hear about your Mom. I hope like hell that you have a lot of help and support right now, too.

I will defend , a bit here though, because from what I know of the man, he would never actively think, 'gee, I don't care if anyone's going though this, I'ma gonna go for the zinger!'...he's just not that type of guy. Sometimes I think we can't imagine the worst actually happening to people we'd probably love to have a beer or chat with, or we'd never get out of bed.

Posted by: replica at January 27, 2010 10:54 PM

"Let Me In, Out, and In Again"

"Let Me In, No, Turn Around"

You could go the most obvious route: "Let Me Inside You"

Posted by: Thurgod at January 27, 2010 10:58 PM

Yeah, I understand it was "supposed" to be a joke, but it wasn't funny. Kinda like fat jokes. Or fag jokes. Or racist jokes.

"Ha, ha, Kim Cattrall is so damn old, she should be wearing adult diapers!" Ah, it's funny because it's TRUE. Because every chick over the age of 35 (just to be safe) should just have her vagina sealed up, she's not gonna need it for anything. Hey, did you know Halle Berry is 43? God, what a hag, who does she think she is, having sex at her age? Gross.

If you want to criticize the artistic desert that is a "Sex and the City" movie, go for it, and I'll probably agree with most of it. But if you can't do that without making jokes about how elderly the female stars are, then you're just not very good at criticism. Maybe you should hand the chore over to someone with a little more age and experience. Just sayin'.

If I'd ever read anything on this site implying that Clint Eastwood, for example (who is nearly 80 years old, for Christ's sake) is a doddering old coot who shouldn't be appearing as the hero in movies anymore because he's elderly and frail and looks like he's gonna stroke out at any minute, maybe it wouldn't be so annoying to read about how a group of women half his age shouldn't be wearing high heels because they're TOO OLD. If cheap shots at Clint Eastwood's (or any other dude's) age have appeared on this site and I just missed them, well, I stand corrected on that point, but my larger point still stands. I kinda expect movie critics to tell me whether a movie is any good. Their personal hangups about "older" chicks are something I don't really give a shit about. It's just not relevant.

Posted by: Slash at January 28, 2010 12:06 AM

Thanks for having my back, replica. Yeah, maybe I was a bit insensitive there, but I'm down a ball and I'm probably looking at a full round of chemo, so while I likely have one of the cancers that can actually be cured, it's not like I have a fuckin' hangnail either.

But seriously: REALLY?, my sympathies and my apologies for offending you. While I have my problems, I do not equate them with the suffering that terminally ill people endure. I can only wish that your mom resides in a state that has done the senisible and humane thing and made medical marijuana legal. And while I disagree with the Obama administration on many levels, I applaud the decision to call off the fed dogs on states that allow medical weed. I wish mine was one of them.

Posted by: , at January 28, 2010 12:57 AM

Is it wrong that I really want Let Me In to be good? I know it won't be, I just know it, but I loved the original (and I don't see the need for a remake, but since they insist I'd like it to be good),I love Chloe Moretz and every once in a little while we get remakes right (The Departed, The Ring).

Having said that, I know it's just going to suck. The title sucks (though the porn and kittie-related associations made me giggle), and according to IMDb her character is named Abby, which is far less ambiguous than Eli... and I just... I just... I can't even form any more coherent thoughts because my frustration is starting to take over!


Anyways, aside from my ramblings, I agree with every one on this list and am now a little sad for the movies this year.

Posted by: Even Stevens at January 28, 2010 3:14 AM

Never mind that Cop Out is literally Black Cop, White Cop, which is a goddamn throwaway joke on "30 Rock." So that should go well.

I'm gonna go watch Clerks and cry.

Posted by: Mr. Tusks at January 28, 2010 9:25 AM

PLEEEEEEEZE tell me Yogi Bear is not real, please!

The entire month of January has sucked, from car wrecks to broken bones to breakdowns...but THIS IS TOO MUCH!!!!!!

I NEED A PIKANIK BASKET, STAT!!!!!!!

Posted by: dammitjanet at January 28, 2010 10:32 AM

Ooh boy. "Eclipse." [SPOILERS AHOY!]

The one where Edward dismantles Bella's car engine to stop her from seeing his hated rival Jacob. And then tells his "perky" sister Alice to lock her up in their house when that fails. But it's all done in the name of love, so that makes it okay!

Also, the one in which Jacob turns into the Big Furry Douche and PG-rated assaults Bella twice (and the first time, she breaks her fucking hand trying to get away from him). But again, all done in the name of love!

Ooh, also it's the one where the sparklepires are horribly racist towards the werewolves (who are quite justified in their own hatred of sparklepires), and no-one calls them out on it. And it's the one where we're introduced to IMPRINTING, in one instance a young werewolf guy imprints on a two-year old girl.

And all this is portrayed as romantic and good!

Yeah. Summit is going to have to edit a whole of ugly out of the book before they can release it. But a part of me is hoping they don't, and then this franchise will fail and we won't have to be subjected to the vampire C-section and subsequent Deathbaby in "Breaking Dong."

Posted by: Aislinn at January 28, 2010 2:59 PM

I have no doubt that SATC2 will suck and is wholly unnecessary. But wow, that little mini-review is full of some intense ageism, dude. Dial it down a notch or three.

Posted by: chriso at January 30, 2010 2:44 PM

We get it, Dustin. You hate movies that mostly women enjoy. You hate movies that mostly teenage girls enjoy. And what you really don't like... is the middle-aged women and teenage girls acting in these films. It's all so trivial, silly and embarrassing for the fans.

On the other hand, the Lethal Weapon or Die Hard franchises are "classic" good fun, right? And anyone who thinks that the middle-aged actors are kidding themselves or that the (mostly male) audience should be ashamed of enjoying something so silly should really get some perspective. Right?

Posted by: kat at January 31, 2010 11:19 AM

No, Kat. I think he hates the Twilight and Sex and the City franchises because they are genuinely bad and anyone who enjoys them unironically should be ashamed of their horrible, horrible taste in film and be stricken of their rights to hold an opinion. They are the "chick flick" equivalent of "Larry the Cable Guy" movies.

Posted by: Craig at January 31, 2010 2:34 PM

Uhhh.. I think many of you are missing the point on the Sex and the City comments. It isn't about age or gender, it's about the absurdity of 40 and 50-somethings acting as immature and materialistic as teenagers and pressing forward with an outdated 1960s "free love" attitude 40 years too late. To make it just that much worse, the characters have no dpeth beyond trying to pitch high-end fashion products to a lapdog audience too naive to recognize it.

Shame!

Posted by: Dopa at January 31, 2010 6:47 PM

Well. Here are all the women, noticeably from the best of list. OIC

Posted by: PunkinElf at February 1, 2010 3:56 PM





Post a comment

 (required)

 (required)


Preview of your comment:



Video ads popping up after each page view? Try clearing your browser's cookies.



Related Posts with Thumbnails









twitter_badge-thumb-300x110-5250.jpg facebook-thumb-300x112-5252.jpg




recentreview.jpg