coralineaughts.jpg

Guides | December 31, 2009 | Comments (89)


Let’s kick this off by acknowledging that this isn’t really a list of the decade’s best kid movies because — let’s face it — kids like nearly everything they see in a movie theater, as evidenced by the upcoming “squeakuel” to 2007’s Alvin and the Chipmunks. While we’d all like to think that our progeny shall be born with very our own impeccable taste, that’s just not how it works, but I do suppose that bodily function jokes are an inevitable rite of passage that most adults learn to either tolerate or ignore and, in unfortunate cases, never outgrow. At this point, I could put together a sanitized list of films that avoid such jokes and call it sufficient, but that’s not of much use here. After all, when it comes to a list like this that concerns films that have been in circulation for a matter of years, most parents/aunts/uncles/siblings are already well aware of where the line is when it comes to what’s appropriate for kids to watch. Besides, this list includes movies that (with the exception of two) have already been reviewed here at Pajiba, so I’m going to assume that any parents who are interested in our take on these movies have already done so.

With that said, I wasn’t about to put together a list that, long after the fact, lectures perfectly capable parents on the films that their kids should watch. Instead, this list is about the aught’s best movies that also happen to be kids movies. That most of these films avoid poop jokes is rather incidental, for these movies are on an altogether different level. Instead, these are the movies that remind of us what it’s like to be a kid. Such a film will quite often break you down and build you back up. Such a film may make you cry your eyes out during the first fifteen minutes, so that, for the rest of the film, you’ll also feel the exhilaration of the old man who fastens thousands of balloons to his house and flies to South America. Some of these films will send chills up your spine as you remember childhood fears with a bittersweet longing, and still others might even scare the living hell out of you, but you’ll be grateful for it. For better or worse, all of these films just happened to be marketed towards a childhood-level audience.

Finally, it must be noted that this is not a list of the aught’s most critically-praised children’s movies. If that were the case, I’d simply list nearly every Pixar movie made, but there are a few of those included here too. Above all, this is a list of kids’ films that are much more than tolerable for adults or, at least, the best ten of them.

despereaux11.jpg10. The Tale of Despereaux (2008): This isn’t the story of the film industry’s eagerness to replicate the success of Ratatouille. Instead, The Tale of Despereaux is Universal’s adaptation of the 2004 Newbery Medal-winning novel and is brought to life through respectable computer-animation. Despereaux relies upon a subdued method of storytelling that would cause the Brothers Grimm to beam in something resembling pride. Indeed, this is quite the darkened tale of a two gentleman, an atypical rat and an even more unorthodox mouse, who become unlikely friends and unite for a most noble cause. It’s a rather complex story of courage, grief, longing, forgiveness, and a pair of rodent friends who, together, seek to right a set of wrongs that occur when something natural is banished from the human world. This film suffers and prospers from its own twin sword, that is, it fails to conform to the usual holiday children’s fare. In addition, the film lacks those ubiquitous twin principles of irony and deconstruction to form a typically charming story with a prepackaged happy ending. Naturally, I found the utter lack of contemporary pop-culture references to be rather refreshing, since all of those whipper-snapper allusions have gone into overkill within children’s films. Speaking as a parent, when these films eventually come out on DVD and are played into the triple digits, that shit gets old. So, forgive me for speaking of the virtues of a more timeless tale that takes great care to place value upon its own merits instead of scoring brownie points by mentioning so many other kick-ass stories in the process. — Agent Bedhead

charlottesweb11.jpg9. Charlotte’s Web (2006): The unavoidable comparison is to Chris Noonan’s Babe, the 1995 film (undoubtedly influenced by Charlotte’s Web) about a pig spared the slaughterhouse due to his unusual and useful ability to herd sheep. Babe is a pig who earns his life and his keep through determination, perseverance, and hard work; Wilbur, by contrast, deserves to live because he is kind, so very kind that he inspires others to act on his behalf. Kindness, of course, is a virtue all too often undervalued, and one that small children probably should be reminded of as often as possible. Still, for dramatic purposes, it creates an imbalance: Wilbur’s is the life at stake, yet he passively waits for Charlotte and the barn rat Templeton to find a way to save it … Still, Winick does much to capture the wonder and whimsy of White’s book, creating a simpler world in an undefined past where both small creatures and small touches matter. The film’s rural setting has the magic realist quality of a Grant Wood landscape, and its human characters, though sometimes dense and often credulous, aren’t stupid; they’re just decent, unsophisticated folk trying to live their lives the best they can. Though the quality of the computer animation is highly variable, the movie gets the important things right, making Charlotte’s web-spinning a glittery, gorgeous feat and Templeton’s adventures gathering his cast-off treasures both gently amusing and just a little bit disgusting. — Jeremy C. Fox

wildthings11.jpg8. Where the Wild Things Are (2009): Spike Jonze’s Where the Wild Things Are is a dark, melancholic film. At times playful, at other times profound, it’s also often aimless and slow, building toward an achy and complicated emotional wallop far heavier than anything Maurice Sendak ever envisioned in his ten-sentence storybook. Nevertheless, it’s a magnificent, unconventional art film, captivating, beautifully shot, and layered with emotional bruises, a dark fairytale that’s likely to appeal to fans of Spike Jonze and Dave Eggers (who co-write the script) alike. But it’s a lousy children’s film. And anybody that tells you that Spike Jonze’s film is faithful to the essence of Maurice Sendak’s storybook has a far different interpretation of Where the Wild Things Are than either my two-year-old son or I do. If you’re expecting 90 minutes of effervescent joy, or a window into your own childhood, forget about it. There’s a few glimpses into the childlike reverie, into that sense of wonder that you might remember as a child, free from responsibility and living in your own world of imagination, running through a forest or howling at the sky. But they are few and far between, bookended by preadolescent traumas and the heavy emotional burdens of growing up.— Dustin Rowles

piglet11.jpg7. Piglet’s Big Movie (2003): Finally, the dimunitive Piglet — the “It’s Not The Size That Matters But What You Do With It” king of the Hundred Acre Wood — gets his due in this original feature film based upon A.A. Milne’s Winnie the Pooh books. This movie’s story revolves around our protagonist’s Napoleon complex, which is triggered when the other anthropomorphized creatures — Winnie, Tigger, Eeyore, Owl, and Rabbit — tell Piglet that he’s too small to join in the semi-dangerous task of gathering honey. So, Piglet becomes quite depressed and pulls something of a disappearing act; later, the gang forms a search party with the help of Piglet’s own diary, which sends the group on a journey through Piglet’s versions of past events (three vignettes), in which Piglet saved the day but never really got the recognition that he deserved. Consistent with the familiar anecdotal tone of Milne’s stories, the movie teaches its lessons in anecdotal form, and the effect is gently affectionate without approaching nauseating territory. The gang learns that their initial dismissal of Piglet was rather hasty and insensitive, and they learn to set aside selfishness and modify behaviors to make Piglet realize that his measure of usefulness is not affected by his small stature. Of course, the animals still inherently retain their own selves, and so Pooh doesn’t quite realize that the amended “Pooh and Piglet’s Corner” perhaps isn’t the proper way to make things completely right, but that’s just part of Pooh’s endearing nature and flawed charm. These imperfect but well-intentioned animals are all too recognizably human. — Agent Bedhead

monstersinc.jpg6. Monsters, Inc. (2001): Pixar isn’t just damn good at creating visually impressive computer animation. Above all, this studio never forgets the indispensible well-written script with a genuinely emotional backbone. In Monsters, Inc., the energy of Monstropolis is harvested from the screams of children, which are captured by air tanks when monsters use portals to gain entrance though closets and into the bedrooms of children. Unfortunately, human children are becoming quite difficult to scare, so the best “scarer” of them all, Sulley, must go to increasing lengths to produce more scares and avoid a “scream shortage.” Of course, Sulley isn’t a very scary monster at all and, in fact, is a big ol’ softie and the true heart of the story. Things are further complicated by the notion that monsters are deathly afraid of human children, who are believed to be able to kill monsters with a single touch. When a little human rascal named Boo finds her way to Monstropolis, Sulley figures out that, while certainly annoying, the female child doesn’t pose a danger to monsters, and he decides to help her get back home and avoid elimination by the Child Detection Agency. Soon enough, Sulley grows fond of Boo, and they make quite the team for the ages. — Agent Bedhead

cloudy11.jpg 5. Cloudy With a Chance of Meatballs (2009): This adaptation of Judi and Ron Barrett’s 1978 children’s book has been necessarily fleshed out quite a bit for the movie screen. The result is much more satisfying than expected, as Cloudy relishes its own absurdity while delivering vibrant visuals and offbeat humor with an exuberant abandon. Cloudy, without delving into preachiness, also manages to teach kids a few valuable lessons about the wages of gluttony and the dangers of overindulgence. Furthermore, girls will appreciate that, midway through, weathergirl Sam decides to stop hiding her smarts and looks just as beautiful (or even moreso) in geeky glasses and a ponytail than as a generic perky television weather girl. A lot of themes have been packed into this tamale, but Cloudy’s cast carries the load well, and their voice work here is rather amazing in that most of these names are instantly recognizable, but voices don’t jump out at you to the point of distraction. Anna Faris seems to have a voice made for animation, and her Guatemalan cameraman, played by Benjamin Bratt, adds a wry counterbalance to Faris’ perkiness. Mr. T is pretty great in his first credited role since 2002 as the town police chief, and Neil Patrick Harris delivers laughs as Flint’s monkey assistant. Hell, even Andy Samberg fares well as the local sardine can mascot, “Baby” Brent, who is sort of a hybrid between a former-child-star-on-the-skids and that one-girl-on-each-arm guy from David Lee Roth’s “Yankee Rose” video. So, take a bottle of anything and a glazed donut to go, and catch this little movie. — Agent Bedhead

igor11.jpg 4. Igor (2008): As a whole, this deliciously twisted little film owes no favors to its incompetent marketing department. Outside of its proper element, Igor is, to be perfectly honest, demented as all hell and not quite suitable for younger children, but if parents are willing to discuss sorta heavy themes afterwards, this is acceptable viewing for mature 8-year-olds and above. I pretty much dug Igor, which might be a cautionary warning in itself. Certainly, some parents won’t want their kids witnessing this film’s somewhat brazen sexual innuendo or abundant use of violence, including a character who routinely, albeit comically, attempts to commit suicide by way of dynamite, electrocution, and repeatedly blowing a hole through his own head. Exactly. With that said, Igor is a darkly comic attempt to evoke Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein with some slightly gothy touches and a bit of steampunk madness. Igor is much like a Tim Burton animated film that’s been intravenously fed a moderate dosage of antidepressants; as a result, a nice little Prozac sheen floats over the top of what would otherwise be described as an utterly unhinged adventure. As far as I can tell, Igor restricts itself to just one quick and indirect reference to toilet humor, which is, whether we’re talking about a family or an adult film, is quite rare these days. In addition, as a children’s film, Igor possesses a certain twisted charm despite its darker leanings. In the end, several lessons are offered up by Igor, but parents should be prepared for those inevitable in-depth conversations with any children they choose to expose to this story. — Agent Bedhead

up11.jpg3. Up (2009): Directed by Pete Docter with co-direction from Bob Peterson, Up is the most storybook tale to come from Pixar’s stable in a while, which makes sense: Docter’s previous turn at the helm of a Pixar vehicle was 2001’s Monsters, Inc., which explored the flipside of the mythos of children’s stories. His new film calls back to that in everything from structure to character design, most notably in the form of Carl Fredricksen (Ed Asner), an elderly retiree who is three heads high, meaning his body from the neck down is exactly twice as tall as his head. The world of Up is stretched and squished just enough to give it personality but not so much that the characters cease being people. The film opens with a gut-wrenching prologue of Carl’s life from youth to the present, and it’s a powerful sequence that covers the span of decades with nothing more than carefully selected images, scenes, and music. Docter brings a purity of intent that’s inherent in Pixar films as Carl grows up, gets married, and eventually turns to a life of widowed solitude. It’s a heartbreaking set-up that makes Carl into a solid character in minutes, and the movie becomes his story. — Daniel Carlson

penelope11.jpg 2. Penelope (2008): Originally scheduled for release in 2006 but postponed until 2008, Penelope is a sparkling solitaire, an indistinct breed of gemstone that, for its failure to resemble its peers, suffers mainly for lack of appraisal. The film is at once, in its dazzling colorfulness, like an early Tim Burton film, and also, through the slightest of opaque shades, a little like The Ugly Duckling and Beauty and the Beast. First-time director Mark Palansky carefully avoids wallowing in past tales that carry outdated ideals of princesses, who can only be rescued from themselves by way of a prince. In its own way, Penelope manages to forge its own contemporary fairy tale without an endless rehashing of cutesy, wink-wink meta references towards the audience. By refusing to be shocked into submission by its own purported cleverness, the end result of Penelope is an unusually appealing cinematic creature. This novel approach, although quite invigorating, is unorthodox by the today’s children’s cinema standards, which could explain why Penelope never saw a darkened theater until some clever studio exec realized the newfound box-office potential of Atonement’s James McAvoy. The film’s lesson — about establishing one’s own way in life without necessarily becoming half of a couple — isn’t a disposable one, and in the end, Penelope may just intercept a few impressionable young girls before they fall prey to the homogenized, slut-worthy mindset of today’s Hollywood princesses. — Agent Bedhead

coraline11.jpg1. Coraline (2009): Eyes are the windows to the soul, or so we’ve been told countless times. Sometimes, however, we cannot trust even our own eyes, for looks can often be deceiving. This disturbing duality forms the basis for Coraline, a spooky film with an ominous “be careful what you wish for” tagline that sets the tone for the cautionary tale within. Simultaneously anxiety-inducing and affecting, Coraline is an exquisitely attractive film that never achieves its visuals at the expense of the story itself. This seemingly impossible feat occurs through an astonishingly effective collaboration between Neil Gaiman, author of the 2002 horror novella, and director-screenwriter Henry Selick. So much could have gone wrong on the way to the big screen in the hands of a lesser director, but Selick has achieved the fairly tenuous balance between his own craftsmanship and Gaiman’s work. This total integration took seven bloody years to achieve, and the result is an achingly gorgeous film, crafted in diligent detail and accompanied by Bruno Coulais’ deathly beautiful score. Much like the film’s heroine herself, Coraline is clever and inquisitive but more than slightly surly at times. Actually, a good measure of the third act comes with quite a bit of scariness for children under ten years. Coraline may come with a PG-rating, but this is really more of a PG² sort of movie. Don’t be surprised if, after watching this film, you awaken with a nightmarish start, only to discover that a whimpering child is attempting to climb into your bed in the middle of the night. Whew. — Agent Bedhead

Agent Bedhead lives in Tulsa, Oklahoma. She and her little black heart can be found at agentbedhead.com.


The Ten Best Sci-Fi Films of the Aughts | The Best Indie Films of the Aughts







Comments

Where is tap dancing or surfing penguin? Where is trash packing robot? Spike Jonze owes me a few grand in therapy bills. Thanks for side stepping any dreamworks offerings though....

Posted by: Colostomy Baggins at December 15, 2009 2:11 PM

Wait, Penelope is a kids' movie??

I love that movie....

Posted by: Anna von Beaverpuppet at December 15, 2009 2:16 PM

Penelope is a great movie with some wonderful performances. The actor who plays the love interest was in a great 'updated' version of Macbeth on some BBC Neo-Shakeapeare thing. Really good stuff.

Posted by: twig at December 15, 2009 2:21 PM

I'd (personally) substitute Finding Nemo for Monsters, Inc. (though it was a very respectable film). And though Coraline was a very well-made movie, it scared the crap out of me...so, I won't be showing that to my kids. Great list otherwise!

Posted by: bonnie at December 15, 2009 2:22 PM

I thought Charlotte's Web was boring and completely forgettable so I'm surprised it made it on here over WALL-E and Finding Nemo.

Yeah, I'd say this is the list I disagree with the most so far.

Posted by: becks at December 15, 2009 2:23 PM

WAYYYYYY too light on the Pixar here. What about Nemo or the Incredibles? This whole list could've been the Pixar movie that came out each year as your 10 representatives.

Posted by: John Denver's Wingman at December 15, 2009 2:27 PM

And it would've been better for it. (see above comment)

Posted by: John Denver's Wingman at December 15, 2009 2:28 PM

Though I like the list, I don't think I agree with the criteria. Though all of these are children's movies, I don't think of them as such. When I think of good children's movies I think of Toy Story, Madagascar, or The Incredibles. Movies that a clearly made for kids, but are amusing enough that adults can enjoy them as well.

Posted by: Morgan LaFai at December 15, 2009 2:32 PM

Second on Wall-E, Nemo, and the Incredibles.

I haven't seen Wild Things or Coraline but have heard repeatedly that they're not interesting to or appropriate for children respectively.

And. Penelope would bore the holy heck out of every child I know, even though it is wonderful.

I understand the desire to compromise "best children's films" with "most tolerable for adults," but this isn't a thoughtful list from either angle. (If it were a Seriously Random I'd be fine with it.)

Posted by: caroline at December 15, 2009 2:35 PM

Morgan, to quote from Bedhead's setup:

Above all, this is a list of kids films that are much more than tolerable for adults or, at least, the best ten of them.

So the criteria actually are what you want.

Posted by: caroline at December 15, 2009 2:37 PM

Yes... I kept scrolling down expecting Finding Nemo to be the next film. Err... Where it be?

Posted by: Leandra at December 15, 2009 2:38 PM

I generally don't care much for the kiddie fare, but, yeah, The Incredibles was the gold standard for me. I also have a soft spot for it because it was the first movie to which I took my oldest niece. (9 & 10 are two others on this list we saw together.) I don't know if the nieces can handle Coraline, but maybe I'll pick it up for them for Christmas and give it a try.

Posted by: DarthCorleone at December 15, 2009 2:42 PM

I don't really care about the criteria or definitions for this list, I was just overjoyed to see Coraline at #1. For real, seeing that movie in 3D whilst high (after smoking a sketchy bowl behind a snow pile in the theatre parking lot) was the best, most engrossing theatre-going experience of my life.

Posted by: Woody at December 15, 2009 2:45 PM

*passes out in anger*

fffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffff

Posted by: FUCK THIS! (and apparently Frank Stein!) at December 15, 2009 2:46 PM

Yeah I'd just substitute Monsters, Inc. (which I adore) for finding Nemo, which I adore the mostest. But really, you could have the whole list be Pixar, but that wouldn't be fair to anyone. So I'm very happy with these 10!

Posted by: figgy at December 15, 2009 2:53 PM

Oh yeah, WALL-E! I still need to see that, but as far as I know it gets almost nothing but accolades from all corners. Was there some rule that a movie couldn't be on more than one list at once? Was it not a kids movie in the eyes of the reviewer?

I'm semi-new to Pajiba, and I'm really enjoying Agent Bedhead's writing. That said, some of it feels a bit over-written. For example:

"By refusing to be shocked into submission by its own purported cleverness"

I have no idea what that phrase means. Options are either a) I'm too thick to get the point (a very real possibility) or b) you're being too clever by half.

Posted by: jeshap at December 15, 2009 2:54 PM

Maybe the movie 'Strings', didn't make it across to that side of the pond, but it is, hands down, the Number 1 flick for kids of the Aughts.

The whole thing is done with Marionette's and it's an absolute delight. The way the Marionette's give birth is genius.

Posted by: elzupasmonkey at December 15, 2009 2:58 PM

A bit 2008-2009 heavy don't you think? 7 of the 10 came out within the past two years.

Did the author just recently have kids old enough to watch movies with or something?

Posted by: b at December 15, 2009 3:02 PM

Oh, and Bedhead, can we get some reviews for the Tinkerbell movies? I'd love to get your take on them. I personally loved them for the visuals and the fact that Tinkerbell is actually a really cool female lead for once. I think they're great movies for young girls.

Posted by: figgy at December 15, 2009 3:06 PM

caroline: But that is the thing. If a movie is labeled as a children's movie but it not appropriate for children (Where the Wild Things Are) is it really a children's movie? For that matter, if most children find it boring but many adults like it, is it really a children's movie? For example, Chicken Run is one of my favorite movies cause I have a great love for prison escape movies in general. I got every single Great Escape reference. But the children I watched it with could barely sit still. They thought it was the most boring movie they had ever seen. So is it a children's movie? And despite what it says in the intro, children don't like just everything. Or at least not the children in my life.

Posted by: Morgan LaFai at December 15, 2009 3:07 PM

Great list! I would have put Nemo and WALL-E in there also but it's not my list, so.
Both my kids (12 and 8 at the time) saw Coraline and loved it. There were some scarier parts but they were not enough to ruin the movie. They got the gist.

Posted by: Eyvi at December 15, 2009 3:29 PM

Coraline really was THAT good, but what the hell, no love for The Incredibles?
And what year did Spirited Away come out?
I know it's not a traditional kids film but still...

Posted by: Nadine at December 15, 2009 3:32 PM

WALL*E did make the "sci-fi" list.

Posted by: DarthCorleone at December 15, 2009 3:34 PM

FUCK WALL-E

Posted by: Nadine at December 15, 2009 3:37 PM

I'm not gonna say I haven't thought about it Nadine but I'm not sure how it would work. Does he vibrate?

Posted by: becks at December 15, 2009 3:46 PM

You cant let Wall*E near your giblets. Those clamp hands will wreak havoc.

Posted by: Nadine at December 15, 2009 3:54 PM

This is the first list I won't argue with. It's great. I think Wall-E's left out to avoid repetition (it's been in the sci-fi list). The only repeated movie till now is V for Vendetta (comics and sci-fi). As an honorable mention I nominate:

Azur & Asmar: The Princes' quest. Beautiful movie

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0439123/

Posted by: barf at December 15, 2009 4:05 PM

There's no such thing as a kid with good taste. My father graduated with a PhD in nuclear engineering, and when I was young, I sat through all of Kangaroo Jack without spontaneously vomiting, and thought that Van Helsing was the coolest thing ever put on screen.

I'm still young and stupid, but even I'm amazed at how bad taste I had when I was a kid.

Posted by: George at December 15, 2009 4:06 PM

Although, I have to say guys, this is a pretty terrible list. If Where the Wild Things Are is included over Spirited Motherfucking Away, you have a god damn travesty on your hands. Here's what it should look like:

9. Howls Moving Castle
8. Ponyo
7. Coraline
6. Wallace and Gromit the Curse of the Were Rabbit
5. Wall E
4. Up
3. Toy Story 2
2. Finding Nemo
1. Spirited Motherfucking Away

Posted by: George at December 15, 2009 4:11 PM

I love your list too George, especially spirited away. It's the movie whgich made me say this is better than Pixar. Totally got lost in Miyazaki's world and even though he doesn't explain how his world works you just accept it. Beautiful.

And you reminded me of some other great movies like Wallace and Gromit. That said Bedhead's list is also good which is why I didn't argue.

Posted by: barf at December 15, 2009 4:16 PM

I too am shocked at the exclusion of Nemo. Really?? I mean...REALLY?? Up should have been number one. I know this is not a popular opinion here at Pajiba, but I hated Coraline and so did both of my kids. I'll watch it again just to give it another shot, but I find it impossible to believe I will ever find it better than Up.

Posted by: lillie at December 15, 2009 4:25 PM

Thank you George. Your list is great. I would replace Ponyo with The Incredibles, but other then that I think it is perfect.

Posted by: Morgan LaFai at December 15, 2009 4:29 PM

I don't think I can ever watch the new version of Charlotte's Web without having flashbacks to when I first saw it. It was Christmas, my grandfather was dying, and we took all the kids in the family to see the movie and once they got to that part about everyone having to die once it's their time, all the adults in my family started bawling.

Aside from my own issues, I agree with everything on the list, although I might have added "Spirited Away"

Posted by: Claire at December 15, 2009 4:31 PM

Morgan, I agree with you on all points. The intentions were muddled to say the least.

George, great list.

Posted by: caroline at December 15, 2009 4:34 PM

so many agreements: wall-e, chicken run, finding nemo, curse of the were-rabbit, spirited away, the incredibles, ratatouille and howl's moving castle. i'd like to throw in cuaron's harry potter and the prisoner of azkaban as well.

and though it wouldn't make my top ten for the decade, i have to throw out the love for the film version of bridge to teribithia. i LOVED that book when i was a kid and the movie did it such wonderful justice. if it doesn't make you cry, you have no soul. plus, zooey deschanel would have been the coolest music teacher.

Posted by: atinymachine at December 15, 2009 4:44 PM

I was fine.
Really, I was. I was just reading along, la la la.
Then I realized: "The Incredibles isn't on this list!"
Surely, it must have been released in 1999 then, because ANY list of ostensible "children's films" from the aughts that purports to be of any quality would include The Incredibles were it eligible.
Imagine my surprise when I refreshed my memory and saw that it was in fact released in 2004. To which, my good Ms. Bedhead I say good day.
I SAID GOOD DAY!

Posted by: welldressed at December 15, 2009 4:55 PM

Coraline? Yay.

No Mirrormask? Ok, that's not fair. No one saw Mirrormask.

Posted by: Robert at December 15, 2009 4:56 PM

Good list. Coraline really knew how to work my shit. Great film.

Posted by: whatBENwatches at December 15, 2009 4:57 PM

Some good stuff, but no WALL-E? No thanks.

Posted by: jthomas666 at December 15, 2009 5:05 PM

I am so Pixar's bitch. I couldn't make a top ten list of this type because they would all have to be Pixar, because I just adore the Pixar. Other movies = good, Pixar = better.

They should start paying me for this.

Posted by: dsbs at December 15, 2009 5:18 PM

You forgot "Prisoner of Azkaban". I'll wait while the list gets fixed. Also, "Finding Nemo". Again, I'm sure it's just an oversight. Wonderful list otherwise, except for the other movies that were inexplicably and accidentally forgotten.

Posted by: TylerDFC at December 15, 2009 5:24 PM

This is the first Pajiba Top 10 list that I've thoroughly disagreed with. I mean, "Charlotte's Web?" ...Really? I would also argue that "Where the Wild Things Are" isn't really a children's movie at all.

It seems like you left off other Pixar movies for fear of having the list completely dominated by them, but they deserve to be there. The Incredibles is one of my favorite movies of all time let alone a remarkable children's movie.

Posted by: penelope at December 15, 2009 5:27 PM

Where is the freakin' Ghibli on this list?!? For shame!

Posted by: Returnofthesmith at December 15, 2009 5:37 PM

What? Where's Millions?

Posted by: mrs Jones at December 15, 2009 5:37 PM

I saw Mirrormask, Robert. LOVE. The music is completely amazing, btw. I loaned my DVD to a friend to make him watch it. He hasn't yet. DAMN HIM. I want my DVD back, Jon! I want to watch it again! With my niece!

Posted by: Anna von Beaverpuppet at December 15, 2009 6:08 PM

I loved Babe. Although, every time I watch that movie, I have ridiculously strong cravings for roast pork and roast duck. Once I watched it whilst eating a bacon sandwich.

Mmmm, Babe... I mean, Mmmm Bacon.

Posted by: JJ McClay at December 15, 2009 6:19 PM

This is a pretty rough list to swallow. And I'm the king of swallowing rough things........

BOOM!

But seriously, Where the Wild Things Are behind f***ing Penelope and Piglet's Big Movie? That's not my only complaint. But probably my strongest.

Posted by: ChristianH at December 15, 2009 6:31 PM

I won't be adding anything new here, just joining the throng of voices demanding to know where the rest of the Pixar films (most notably The Incredibles and Finding Nemo) are.

And Mirrormask was boring.

Posted by: Daniel Hall at December 15, 2009 6:37 PM

Also, great list George! Now that's one that I can get behind. I had completely forgotten about Wallace and Gromit and Studio Ghibli desperately needs representation here.

Posted by: penelope at December 15, 2009 6:53 PM

And Mirrormask was boring.

You're boring.

I'm sorry. That was unnecessarily mean. I don't know you enough to say that. I forget that not everyone loves molasses-paced dream-imagery driven by bizarre music. I've had this fight over Les triplettes de Belleville, too, and never learn my lesson.

But Finding Nemo is a horrifying film that should never be seen by children. How many times can you kill off the same characters before ruining someone's day? 5? 10? 20? I lost count of the false-death total in this film. The only thing that stopped me walking out of that theater with my more-horrified mother was Ellen Degeneres. Surely that will go down as one of the greatest voice-acting performances of all time.

Posted by: Robert at December 15, 2009 6:53 PM

What the fuck is this?!

Posted by: sheshakes at December 15, 2009 6:58 PM

Nice alternate list, George. Although I have differ with Ponyo - my daughter and I both found it too boring.

Posted by: idiosynchronic at December 15, 2009 7:01 PM

Tale of Despereaux, Charlotte’s Web, Piglet’s Big Movie, Igor, and Penelope were all awful. What the fuck? Where are Spirited Away, Wall E, Happy Feet, Bridge to Terabithia, The Incredibles, and pretty much all the other kids movies that were infinitely better than the ones on this list.

Posted by: AV at December 15, 2009 7:27 PM

Reall, lillie, UP? blegh. I mean it was fine, I guess, but it just did nothing for me. The old man and the little kid just weren't doing it for me as characters and then we got the talking dogs, at which point I said oh-what-fucking-ever. Maybe it's just me, but the stories and character didn't click for me at all with that one.

Posted by: Woody at December 15, 2009 7:37 PM

Thanks for complimenting my list, everyone.

On a related matter, I've noticed a lot of people say that Coraline wasn't really suitable for all children, that's certainly true, as it'll scare the crap out of most of the little tikes, but it will still entertain the braver tikes, posesses a nice, concise running time, centers itself around the issues of children, and is just plain pretty. For those reasons, I think Coraline is a valid inclusion.

Although someone noted the absence of Millions, while I haven't seen Millions, seeing as it was included on films for lil' Pajiba, as well as several other worthy films, you all are honor bound to include at least one of the films from that guide. Yet you didn't, further lowering my opinion of this list.

Posted by: George at December 15, 2009 8:11 PM

It's really is a losing battle to just try and limit to just 10 best kids movies of the aughts(man I hate that term). Out of all movie genres, has any single one had a better decade than kids movies? Sure there are still crappy ones that try to cash in on the success of others, but compared to when I was a kid...well this generation is lucky. Pixar alone has made every single film of theirs better than any I can think of from my childhood. Although, I have to say, I am utterly disgusted that "Sponge Bob: The Movie" was not included. No bullshit, I ended up seeing that opening week with a bunch of my navy buddies and their kids (seriously, try to imagine six guys, ripped, and covered with tattoos being led around by a mix of 12 to 5 year olds.) We had a freaking blast. I don't know who laughed more, us adults or the kids. I try to work into daily conversation "I rode the Hassleholf" at least twice a day.

Posted by: Diablo at December 15, 2009 8:55 PM

better title: best top TWISTED movies SUPPOSEDLY for kids.

no "Ice Age"? you have got to be twisting me.

sorry AGBH, but you suck.

Posted by: la chica at December 15, 2009 8:57 PM

Needs more Miyazaki. As in the list needs to be like 1/3 Miyazaki or something.

Posted by: Royalewithcheese at December 15, 2009 9:08 PM

As a mother of a ten year old and an eight year old, I would have to say that George's list is more on the mark.

For their end of year school excursion, my children and their class mates, and children from the younger grades (we're talking 5, 6 and 7 year olds) are going to see "Where The Wild Things Are". I'm not sure that the teachers know what they're in for...

Posted by: Mrs Nesbitt at December 15, 2009 9:36 PM

Huh, it seems I've entered a world where Ratatouille never existed.

Posted by: sansho1 at December 15, 2009 9:42 PM

I think the hate for this list is pretty unanimous, who is up for this list getting scrapped and implimenting a user voted list?

Posted by: Returnofthesmith at December 15, 2009 9:53 PM

Wall-E?
Please tell me this is some sick, twisted fucking joke.
That movie was fantastic.
As was Finding Nemo, though I never liked it as much as Wall-E.
This is a travesty.
However.
I thank you from the bottom of my heart for not including the shit-storm that was Ratatouille.

Posted by: A-ron at December 15, 2009 10:27 PM

Bedhead definitely over thought this one. Maybe she was unsatisfied with a list that was 80% Pixar but the list suffers badly for it. And many of these movies either scare the crap out of kids (Coraline) or bore them silly. Penelope was a nice surprise but it shouldn't be on the list above #9. Despereaux, Piglet, and Charlotte's Web shouldn't be within a hundred miles of this list. The Incredibles, Ratatouille, and Finding Nemo are so much better choices. I thought Kung Fu Panda was pretty great. And now for the movie no one except me thinks belongs on the list: Speed Racer. That movie gets more play on our DVD player than almost anything.

One thing I'll give AB credit for is leaving MFing Wall-E off the list.

George, good list but Toy Story 2 doesn't qualify as it was released in 1999.

Posted by: ed newman at December 15, 2009 10:29 PM

George's list is much better in regards to movies kids enjoy. Ratatouille, WALL-E and Flushed Away (the kids loved it) are deserving to be on the list as well. The list is the worst one of the lists so far, I just don't agree with it at all.

Posted by: Alex at December 15, 2009 10:56 PM

Yea this list pretty much blows. I'm glad everyone agrees Finding Nemo should've been on this list. I mean, don't get me wrong I like UP and Monsters Inc. but Nemo, Incredibles, Wall-E...all better choices imo. However, other movies that should've been on this list: Horton Hears a Who, Happy Feet, Lemony Snicket's A Series of Unfortunate Events, anyone?

Posted by: Littlejon2001 at December 16, 2009 12:11 AM

Wow... no love for Finding Nemo or The Incredibles on this list?
jeez.. My high school marching band (yes, I am a band nerd) played a montage of the songs from The Incredibles, and they never play anything that hasn't been released for more than 15 years. (see: Indiana Jones[the first movie] and Star Wars[the ...fourth movie] shows from 5 years ago-ish)
But ya, apparently no love for Pixar.

es-CAAP-pe!

Posted by: JohnnyThei at December 16, 2009 1:21 AM

I have a feeling that a lot of the "omissions" will show up in a Best Animated Movies list. So hold on to your panty-liners, people and stop freaking out.

Also, I'd like to bitch-slap whoever suggested Madagascar and Ice Age. Heathens.

Posted by: figgy at December 16, 2009 1:21 AM

Exactly figgy. Anyone who recommended Madagascar, Ice Age, Horton Hears a Who or Speed Racer I just want you to know that if you made the list all of these people would be calling YOU an idiot so maybe remember that before you condemn Agent Bedhead.

Posted by: becks at December 16, 2009 8:32 AM

I'll just throw out this observation:

Bedhead's List is wonderful. It makes me interested to see many of these movies with an eye for what my 9 month old might dig a few years down the road...

However. This list should be a different "guide to what's good for you"- one of the more traditional, quirky guides that aim to point us in a direction we might not have otherwise even considered.

A "best of the aughts" list should be exactly that. No worrying about choosing too many from one studio or another, no clever choices to highlight some obscure movie that you wish everyone would see, but the best movies of the past 10 years (in this case, for kids).

I have no intention of anointing George or anything- frankly, anyone could have come up with that list- but that is the point. That list is what a best of the aughts list should look like. It has the best movies.

Posted by: dg at December 16, 2009 9:09 AM

Where are Wall-E and Ratatouille? I know Wall-E was in the Sci-Fi list but it's still a "kids" movie and a great one; I guess you didn't want to fill the list with Pixar movies but if everything Pixar does is great, then I guess you can't ignore those movies just to make the list more "balanced" (and thank god no Shrek movie is on the list)

Posted by: Radlum at December 16, 2009 9:35 AM

I wonder what it says about me as a mother that my girls (6 and 8) were afraid of neither Coraline nor Where the Wild Things Are. But they also like "I'm Alive" on Animal Planet about gory animal attacks, so maybe they're not representative of all 1st and 2nd graders.
Also, I saw Maurice Sendak on HBO First Look saying he thought the film interpretation of the book was spot on. So, Dustin, maybe you're reading it wrong.

Posted by: ShannonAnn at December 16, 2009 11:05 AM

I have no intention of anointing George or anything- frankly, anyone could have come up with that list- but that is the point. That list is what a best of the aughts list should look like. It has the best movies.

It's also much easier to make a more widely accepted list AFTER reading all of the grievances about which movies, directors, and studios weren't included in the original. George's list about as risky as taking a poll.

Posted by: jM at December 16, 2009 12:16 PM

Right on, jM.

Posted by: becks at December 16, 2009 12:22 PM

Disagree with all the Finding Nemo love. I worship Pixar and sing their praises as much as the next guy, and I certainly *enjoyed* Finding Nemo and The Incredibles, but Monster's Inc lingered in a way those films didn't, and Up is a diamond-cut masterpiece.

I loved Mirrormask, but "not everyone loves molasses-paced dream-imagery driven by bizarre music" sums it up perfectly. Not everyone's cuppa.

Oh my christ where the hell is Spirited Away? Why, Agent Bedhead, why?? Howl's Moving Castle is beautiful and wonderful but the plot kinda unravels, and I think all the war imagery = aimed at preteens more than out-and-out little tykes. I haven't seen Ponyo yet, but I have heard repeatedly that it has pacing... issues, which is poison to a kiddie flick.

Posted by: jeshap at December 16, 2009 1:20 PM

Ok hey so for all you regulars: are these forums at all comparable to the Onion AV Club ones, where the site authors occasionally respond, or are all our pleas/demands for an explanation in vain?

Posted by: jeshap at December 16, 2009 1:22 PM

Mostly in vain. As they should be really.

Posted by: becks at December 16, 2009 1:36 PM

Are you fucking high? The whole list I am expecting to see Finding Nemo at number one and then its not on the list at all?

Posted by: EricD at December 16, 2009 2:30 PM

Most of these are from 2008 and 2009. Short memory?

Posted by: Carlos at December 16, 2009 4:44 PM

And Mirrormask was boring.

You're boring.

I'm sorry. That was unnecessarily mean. I don't know you enough to say that. I forget that not everyone loves molasses-paced dream-imagery driven by bizarre music. I've had this fight over Les triplettes de Belleville, too, and never learn my lesson.

Posted by: Robert at December 15, 2009 6:53 PM

Fair enough. Of course, what I meant was; 'Mirrormask bored me'. Too much dreamlike imagery (often poorly rendered), not enough plot. But then, different strokes. I'm glad you dug it.

Posted by: Daniel Hall at December 17, 2009 12:02 AM

Sorry; disregard that last post. Of course, what I meant to type was;

SHUT UP YOU'RE BORING AND YO' MAMA'S BORING

Posted by: Daniel Hall at December 17, 2009 12:03 AM

CORALINE BETTER THAN UP? Is this some ridiculously contrived joke? By god, if I was nearly bored to tears by Coraline, no way would most kids sit through it!

Posted by: Kate at December 17, 2009 4:46 PM

i have to agree with everyone here, Wall-E was absolutely great & Spirited Away (which would have been my number one) deserved a mention at the very least.

Posted by: Lola at December 18, 2009 1:06 AM

Seriously, where the eff is Wall-E?

Posted by: Sapphiar at December 18, 2009 12:52 PM

I had forgotten about Igor until I read this list, so when I saw it by the cash register at the grocery store, I picked it up. After fighting the urge to fall asleep 30 minutes in, I just finally realized what my brother had been talking about all these years. Cusack really is the same dude in every movie who is unable to show any emotion. He is terrible as a voice actor, and any movie that makes Molly Shannon the shining star has some serious flaws. Jay Leno as a leading character? Are you kidding me? This thing is so boring and lame that when my husband asked what I thought, I restrained myself in case he liked it and said it was stupid. He said, "Really? You really think so?.....because I thought it was awful." I said it came recommended, it was on a top ten list, and he said, "Were there only 10 movies this decade?"

Posted by: lawnjart at December 23, 2009 10:01 AM

Wow ... just... fucking ... wow.

I love Keith David and it was a pretty compelling story, but ... hmmm ... let's see, the strongest endorsement you've received for putting that kid's mind-fuck-of-a-movie Coraline at number one says this:

For real, seeing that movie in 3D whilst high (after smoking a sketchy bowl behind a snow pile in the theatre parking lot) was the best, most engrossing theatre-going experience of my life.

That's pretty fucking telling. Ditto to the naysayers, and add Kung Fu Panda because this is a list of fucking kids' movies. Kids' movies don't need to mesmerize or go deep. Kids have enough shit to deal with outside of the fucking theater.

And in conclusion ... fucking wow.

Posted by: Johnnyboy at January 3, 2010 10:01 PM

Bump Charlotte's Web off the list for Wallace and Gromit and the Curse of the Were Rabbit, that's all I have to say. Seriously, how can anyone forget Finding Nemo? Christ!

Posted by: Ilmarien at January 4, 2010 4:11 PM

Thank you so much for including "Monsters, Inc." (my favorite Pixar movie) and not Wall-E. It was good, but with its comparatively mean-spirited message about overweight people and its slow story, was easily the most overrated of Pixar's movies, and I don't understand why so many were head over heels for it.

Posted by: Matt 2.0 at January 4, 2010 6:59 PM

Am I the only guy in the world who thinks that Wall-E, Up, Ratatouille and Finding Nemo are highly overrated? The Incredible is hands down the best Pixar movie to date. Yet, you selected Up. The only reason why Up has been on every critics "Best of 2009 List" was the simple fact that it was better than most of the sub-par movies of that year. (It seems that every year, the movies just get worse and worse.)What I'm trying to say is that Up is a little better than 'okay', at best. I probably wouldn't be giving you as much shit if you would have put Finding Nemo on the list. Oh, and where the hell is Shrek 1 and 2? (Shrek is Dreamworks and not thank- you-SteveJobs-for-making-Pixar). This list has been immediately discredited!

Posted by: A Movie Buff at January 20, 2010 4:03 PM

10.Spirited Away
9.Monsters Inc
8.The Incredibles
7.Finding Nemo
6.Shrek 2
5.Coraline
4.Kung Fu Panda
3.Happy Feet
2.Up!
1.Wall-E

Posted by: Nya at June 25, 2010 3:21 PM





Post a comment

 (required)

 (required)


Preview of your comment:



Video ads popping up after each page view? Try clearing your browser's cookies.



Related Posts with Thumbnails









twitter_badge-thumb-300x110-5250.jpg facebook-thumb-300x112-5252.jpg