web
counter
 

The Ten Best Films of 2009

By Dustin Rowles | Posted Under Guides | Comments (111)



star_trek1024.jpg

What is there to say? The movies of 2009 were all over the map, but perhaps the best way to make sense of them as a whole is to appreciate the resurgence of simple pleasures and returns to form found in the year’s best films. Star Trek is a shaky-cam explosion of lens flares that’s nevertheless a rock-solid blockbuster built on character and humor. District 9 uses the newest tech to tell the oldest kind of story, about identity and war. And Up, the most accomplished and nuanced film to date from Pixar, is a simple story about an old man coming to grips with death. These were the best films of the year for the way they moved us, and for the way they seemingly did the impossible by telling very specific stories with universal resonance. It’s a varied but worthy group, and one that made 2009 as enjoyable as it was. Without any more yammering, let’s get down to it:

ingbasterds.jpg10. Inglourious Basterds: We watch movies to be lied to. More than any other medium that comes to mind, they thrive on deceit and myth-making, and Quentin Tarantino’s Inglourious Basterds seems to revel in this fact. Mélanie Laurent plays a fugitive in the guise of a cinema owner, Brad Pitt’s Tennessee-born soldier tries to pass for an Italian filmmaker, Michael Fassbender’s British film critic must pretend to be a German soldier, Diane Kruger’s actress makes for an ideal spy, Christoph Waltz’s sociopath hides behind a mask of civility, Daniel Brühl’s reluctant war hero becomes a celebrity and so on, until a movie theater itself becomes a tomb for the Nazi elite. Action sequences are outdone by dialogue exchanges, while history changes for the better simply because it can. In Quentin’s world, everyone is a bastard during wartime, and anything goes at the movies. — William Goss

startrektest1.jpg9. Star Trek : J.J. Abrams’ Star Trek accomplishes the impossible: It reboots an entire film franchise even while honoring the spirit of its beginnings, and it breathes new and heated life into a series grown stale. The director reteams with writers Roberto Orci and Alex Kurtzman; the same team also crafted the fantastically done Mission: Impossible III, and Orci and Kurtzman’s writing and producing credits include “Alias” and “Fringe.” They’ve created something wonderful in Star Trek: a fast-paced, breathless space opera, crammed with action, humor, and heart. Of the original film series, only the second and sixth entries — The Wrath of Khan and The Undiscovered Country — stand up as legitimately good films, thanks to director Nicholas Meyer’s emphasis on character conflict and dramatic action. Abrams and crew take a cue from those films but go light-years further and faster, upping the number of action sequences but also marrying them to an intriguing story. It’s easily one of the most fun films to hit theaters in some time, and the perfect summer blockbuster. — Daniel Carlson

fantastic_mr_fox_review.jpg8. Fantastic Mr. Fox: Not to sound like a lazy freshman trying to coast through Introductory Composition and Rhetoric, but I think we should start this off by remembering that the original and primary definition of “fantastic” is not “excellent” but rather “based on fantasy … conceived by unrestrained fancy.” So thinking about all that, it’s appropriate that he’s the one who’s adapted Roald Dahl’s Fantastic Mr. Fox for the big screen. The detail and conception are gorgeous, as if Anderson’s been dreaming of doing this all along, and he and co-writer Noah Baumbach have done an excellent job at transposing very human attitudes and concerns onto a bunch of wild animals just trying to survive in the woods. It’s energetic and kind, and the splendid stop-motion animation doesn’t look or feel like any other film out there. The film is, indeed, conceived by unrestrained fancy, an explosion of style and grace that feels like a storybook come to life, packed with incisive humor and genuine heart. — Daniel Carlson

adventureland403.jpg7. Adventureland: If the humor in director Greg Mottola’s Superbad was largely credited to writers Seth Rogen and Evan Goldberg, then surely Mottola deserves accolades for taking all those dick jokes and giving them a sturdier than expected emotional context; like it or not, there’s a kind of gritty sweetness to the way the core male relationship played out in that film, and it’s that kind of emotional truth that Mottola brings in spades to Adventureland. Directing from his own screenplay, Mottola creates a film that’s funny without being wacky and sweet without being saccharine, and he manages to perfectly capture that glistening moment right between youth and whatever comes next. The film is a heartbreaking, bittersweet coming-of-age story born of Mottola’s own experiences working summer jobs, but it’s broad enough to resonate as more than just a comedy about (post-)teens. It couldn’t be further from Superbad in tone or execution — for just starters, no one’s pants are at any point stained with menstrual blood — but it’s that film’s direct descendant in emotional honesty and its filmmaker’s decision to mature just like his characters. — Daniel Carlson

500_days_of_summer.jpg6. (500) Days of Summer : (500) Days of Summer isn’t an easy movie to describe. Try explaining to a friend why you’re in love with your significant other. You might say, “She’s beautiful; she’s got a great sense of humor; she’s wicked intelligent; and she has a great rack,” but this won’t do your significant other justice. They’re just words, and words rarely stack up to the effervescent giddiness you feel when you’re falling in love, or the crushing heartache an unexpected end to relationship can often leave. (500) Days of Summer, like few movies I’ve ever seen, accurately captures the range of emotions that accompany falling in love and then having your heart shattered. And while the dialogue is witty, and real, and funny, and smart, it’s director Marc Webb’s attention to the details that make (500) Days of Summer such a deeply authentic movie. There are a lot of movie about love, and even more that think they are, but very few successfully capture that helpless uncertainty attendant to a new relationship — the overwhelming need to pin it down, to label it, to gain a sense of security, to know that what he or she is feeling is not fleeting. — Dustin Rowles

3262_7739543817.jpg5. District 9: At its heart, District 9 is about the lines we draw around “us” and “them,” and how truly shaky those lines are. We can accept any sort of horror, any torture, as long as it isn’t one of us. The film feeds on the horror implicit in how easy it is to carry a one and move someone back and forth across that line. It is an intelligent and layered film, but as the old adage goes, ideas are boring, so if you must tell a story about ideas, be sure to wrap it with a bunch of explosions. — Steven Wilson

awaytest1.jpg4. Away We Go: Away We Go is a genuine treasure for being an original story that wonderfully, grandly, joyously weaves together the disparate strands of what could be called Eggers’ worldview into a warm and moving tapestry. Krasinski and Rudolph are at the top of their game, and they make Bert and Verona believable as dramatic characters as well as empathetic and humorous ones. This is Krasinski’s best performance yet, and he’s amazing at capturing the giddy excitement of an expectant father as well as the worry and fear that he won’t be able to protect his baby girl from a world he doesn’t know how to fix. Rudolph is equally impressive. She’s strong, smart, funny, and creates the ideal onscreen match for Krasinski. They click with the ease of two people who have centered their lives on taking care of each other. Because that’s what Away We Go is about, and what it manages to so sublimely stumble upon in a pitch-perfect ending that can’t help but call to mind the lofty wordless emotion of the closing pages of Eggers’ book from a decade earlier. These are young people figuring out how to take care of each other, wondering what it means to be adult, and trying to discover the place they’ve been looking their whole lives to find. — Daniel Carlson

uprev1.jpg3. Up: Up is the 10th feature from Pixar Animation Studios, and it so skillfully and wonderfully extends the company’s filmmaking record that it would be easy to dismiss the movie as nothing more than their latest assembly-line perfection. The film is as gorgeously rendered as viewers have come to expect a Pixar film to be, packed with colors and styles that mesh to create a unique universe that’s still recognizable as Pixar’s, and the story and characters are as genuine and joyful as ever. But the film’s real strength is in the way it conveys emotional nuance with nothing more than the right image, and how it turns what at times is a slightly “cartoonish” script into something resonant and heartbreaking. — Daniel Carlson

up-in-the-air-review.jpg2. Up in the Air: Jason Reitman’s Up in the Air is a brilliantly deceptive film. Superficially, it’s a light dramedy percolating with rich and complicated performances from George Clooney, Vera Farmiga, and Anna Kendrick. It’s smart, and witty, and exuberantly entertaining. It’s easy to get so wrapped up in the story of these three people that you barely notice the thematic weight that Reitman is packing on your shoulders until the end, when he pulls out the carpet from underneath you so fast that your kneecaps break and you’re left sitting on your ass wondering how that nice movie with the charming gentleman just mugged you. Up in the Air is more than a story about layoffs and terminations — it’s about personal identity. It’s about how our jobs can define us, the fragile nature of those positions, and how easily our identities can be stripped away from us. The intelligent comedy will pull you in, but it’s the melancholy that will stay with you long after you’ve left the theater. — Dustin Rowles

hurtlockerrev.jpg1. The Hurt Locker: I usually avoid including a particular viewing experience with a film review, since it’s unfair and dangerous to start behaving like one has any great bearing on the other. But one of the highest compliments that can be paid to a film is the acknowledgment that it’s still replaying itself in the deeper recesses of your mind, and since seeing Kathryn Bigelow’s The Hurt Locker, I have only grown more affected by its tale. It’s a perfectly paced action film that never resorts to gimmickry to convey suspense; it’s a character-based war drama that avoids the easy stereotypes of soldiers and their relationships; and it’s an expertly observed story about the current war that eschews partisanship just as it also does any kind of lazy moralizing or appearances of objectivity. In other words, the film doesn’t purport to rise above politics while quietly damning the leaders. It truly is about the characters and their stories, allowing the atrocities of war and the path of history to speak for themselves. The Hurt Locker is arresting both emotionally and aesthetically, and it’s the first great film to arise from the wreckage of the Iraq War. — Daniel Carlson









A Pajiban Walks into a Bar | Biggie and Tupac -- Watch for Free













Comments

Oooo God I'm not sure if I really NEED to see Up in the Air or if it would be bad. I'm dealing with a big career crises and a medium-sized identity crisis and it sounds like seeing that would push me one direction or the other.

The Hurt Locker just left our theaters and I'm pissed I missed it on the big screen. I didn't see 5-8, either, but it's 1 and 2 I really want to rectify.

Posted by: Snuggiepants the Deathbringer at January 7, 2010 3:05 PM

May every person who comments something along the lines of "What?! I can't believe you didn't include _______________." Have their britches fill immediately with a bout of fiery trouser gravy.

That said, this thread is either gonna be short or stinky.

Posted by: Skitz at January 7, 2010 3:06 PM

*sigh* Do you really want to provoke another rant from BSlim? He's probably herniating from the header pic alone.

Posted by: DeadBessie at January 7, 2010 3:08 PM

@ snuggie: Up is not that bad emotionally re what you're dealing with...it very well conveys sadness at the loss of a pattner and hope at the same time. good little move. would't call it the best, but this isn't my site!

Posted by: d at January 7, 2010 3:09 PM

partner...

Posted by: d at January 7, 2010 3:10 PM

Snuggie

See it. I haven't been out of an identity crisis for over a decade, and I found it to be beautiful, sad and interesting. Also it didn't stoop to cheap answers.

Posted by: twig at January 7, 2010 3:10 PM

Hee! DeadBessie beat me to it.

Posted by: Anna von Beaverpuppet at January 7, 2010 3:12 PM

Mmmm, trouser gravy....

Posted by: Snath at January 7, 2010 3:12 PM

Argh, I'd put The Hangover ahead of several of those, but they're all good. B-Slim will have his usual aneurysm over Trek.

Posted by: socalledonlycousins at January 7, 2010 3:13 PM

I'll just treat the offending entry as if it wasn't there.

Moving on, Adventureland, reeeeally? Seriously? Then again you go and cream yourselves over another Zooey Deschanel vehicle. Admit it if it wasn't for her that flick wouldn't be ANYWHERE near this list. Note, I'm not saying these two films are bad, I'm just sayin' they are not "Best of" material.

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at January 7, 2010 3:16 PM

am i THE ONLY one who stopped Adventureland 20 or so minutes from the end and never looked back?

Posted by: gp at January 7, 2010 3:18 PM

Squee! District 9 made the list. I wasn't expecting Fantastic Mr. Fox to, but I agree on everything else. Good work.

Posted by: Oracle at January 7, 2010 3:22 PM

While I've only seen three of these (Up, Away We Go and Advntureland), I WANT to see all of them, so... good list?

Posted by: Sara at January 7, 2010 3:22 PM

I still can't watch a movie starring that beard.

Posted by: Jay at January 7, 2010 3:25 PM

Good list. And thank you for FINALLY putting Away We Go above 500 days of Summer. It is the far superior movie.

Posted by: Kate at January 7, 2010 3:25 PM

I've just realized Zombieland isn't on this list, how's that even POSSIBLE. Now I am POSITIVE you dweebs are FULL. OF. SHIT.

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at January 7, 2010 3:26 PM

Great list. I'd been on the fence about seeing Away We Go, but now I'll give it a shot.

Posted by: welldressed at January 7, 2010 3:27 PM

I finally, finally got around to watching Inglourious Basterds the other day (and jesus it causes me pain to type that fucking name) and...um
...Is that it?
I hate to be 'that guy' but it really was just shit. I dont think QT's 'long talky scene' shtick works for me any more, I loved it in Resevoir Dogs and Pulp Fiction, but in this, it didn't work, especially in the POSSIBLE SPOILER basement bar scene with Fassbender.

Some shots where stunning, the scene with the black cinema employee behind the screen (again, POSSIBLE SPOILER) was amazing.
And I didn't dislike Eli Roth, the kid isn't an actor but he's not a block of wood either.

but no, otherwise, it was a meh for me.

Up broke my heart then raped the pieces. And I loved it. I can never watch it again without being totally trippily high and happy in it, and thus unlikely to completely fucking kill myself in the first ten minutes. But it was a wonderful movie.

Star Trek rocked. Simple as that.

District 9 was THE BALLS, just SUCH a good movie, and redefined how to say Fuck.
I didn't see any of the others so cant offer comment

Posted by: Nadine at January 7, 2010 3:29 PM

Wait!!! Bslim, you're fucking right, WTF?!
WHERE IS ZOMBIELAND?!

Posted by: Nadine at January 7, 2010 3:29 PM

Two notable omissions - The Hangover (funniest movie of the year, hands down) and Avatar. Replace (500) Days of Summer and Adventureland (each of which should be on the most disappointing movies of the year list) with those two and you've got yourself a pretty good list.

Posted by: sosumi at January 7, 2010 3:32 PM

Not only did Zombieland not make the list, but Zombie Strippers didn't even make the list. Come on, best Zombie movies of the Zeros. Make the list now!

Posted by: BWeaves at January 7, 2010 3:32 PM

Zombieland is where it belongs.

Posted by: Snath at January 7, 2010 3:33 PM

Hilarious posts by Messrs. Goss and Carlson keep the satire coming.

Posted by: jaf at January 7, 2010 3:33 PM

Inglourious Basterds was good and I liked it better than Pulp Fiction, so there is that. I hate Pulp Fiction for the most part.

I have The Hurt Locker in my Netflix queue. I have to prepare myself for that one.

Posted by: Melody at January 7, 2010 3:34 PM

In the spirit of Pajibitchery, I must protest the lack of inclusion of Where the Wild Things Are. Your list is lovely and I can respect it, and I therefore demand reciprocity. Please consider at least spiritually adding this stunningly beautiful, emotionally heartfelt and at times devastating film. Else I shall be forced to kill George even before he comes in to piss all over the place.

In all sincerity,

Big C.

Posted by: Cindy at January 7, 2010 3:38 PM

Mmmm fiery trouser gravy. Don't threaten me with a good time, Skitz!

Anyhoo, the only surprise on this list, for me anyway, was Fantastic Mr. Fox. Switch that with Zombieland and then fill my britches with fiery trouser gravy! I'm good to go.

Posted by: Peanut_Butter_And_James at January 7, 2010 3:39 PM

I need to see Hurt Locker SO BAD.

Posted by: Nadine at January 7, 2010 3:41 PM

Me too Nadine.

Posted by: Cindy at January 7, 2010 3:42 PM

Christoph Waltz was SO GOOD in Inglourious. So very good. I love my villians to be portrayed with a smile.

Posted by: Julie at January 7, 2010 3:45 PM

I discovered Adventureland on a plane coming home from Spain as part of a 24 hour journey through several airports, after getting robbed and trying to deal with Barcelona police. If the movie made me cry, I'm not saying it was the stress of the journey or nothin'... but I really loved the movie. A repeat viewing might not be as kind as a stressed-out, pissed off at shitty Barcelona thieves traveler was, but for now I'll remember it fondly.

Posted by: Brenton at January 7, 2010 3:45 PM

Is it just me, or was there a serious dearth of really good movies this year? Outside of The Hurt Locker and Inglourious Basterds, were there any other genuinely great films? I liked all in the above list, but in any other year they wouldn't be anywhere near a top ten... Right?

Posted by: boogs at January 7, 2010 3:46 PM

Julie, was he the Jew Hunter?
He WAS awesome, he made the 'charming killer' cliche very watchable

Posted by: Nadine at January 7, 2010 3:48 PM

I saw Away We Go entirely on the recommendation of this site, and Mrs. Bullet and I enjoyed it immensely. (She cried at the end because she's a big girl.) As for the others? Shit, I have to start going to more movies.

Posted by: Tracer Bullet at January 7, 2010 3:50 PM

Adventureland, hmmm. It didn't really make an impression on me, but perhaps it warrants a second viewing. Overall, this is a very decent list - I'm inspired to see a couple of films that I haven't gotten around to.

Also, for those of you who think The Hangover was the Funniest Movie Ever...really? I'm missing something. It had its moments, sure, but IMO it wasn't any funnier than other films of its ilk.

Posted by: Bre at January 7, 2010 3:56 PM

He was Nadine-he scared the crap out of me.

Out of all of these, I've seen Inglourious, Star Trek, Adventureland, Away We Go, and Up. I adored all of them.

I can't WAIT to see District 9. Get your ass moving Netflix!

Posted by: Julie at January 7, 2010 3:58 PM

I saw everything but Fox in the theater which makes me either smug and culturally superior or careless with my time and money. You decide.

Posted by: coveredinbees at January 7, 2010 4:02 PM

Adventureland was nothing but 80's nostalgia. I understand why people of a certain age group thought it was amazing, but it was actually pretty much crap.

Posted by: Erm at January 7, 2010 4:04 PM

Not a bad list...

Posted by: Ted at January 7, 2010 4:13 PM

great list/descriptions. At the risk of personal embarrassment for my poor tastes, here's my top 21 of 09

http://bloobitybloobityblahblah.blogspot.com/

Posted by: THRILLHO at January 7, 2010 4:13 PM

Having Kristen "misery chick lip-biter" Stewart in any Hollywood product is all I need to determine that said product will not rise above the level of pedestrian.

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at January 7, 2010 4:17 PM

9/10 for me! I still haven't seen (500) Days of Summer. Though, admittedly, I liked Inglorious Basterds more than 9-4 (all good films, however, so I'm not complaining). I was kinda disappointed with the climax of Star Trek. The villain never got his chance to really flesh out, never got that revelation that his crusade was actually wrong. I love when that happens in movies like that, when the bad guy suddenly comes to realize that what he's doing is wrong, but decides to keep fighting anyway, that sort of thing. I thought that's where the movie was building, but it never got there. Eric Bana didn't even have a line in the final battle sequence. Kind of let me down. But whatevs.

What a weird fucking year 2009 was. Still, rocking on to 2010! PAJIBA 4 EVERZZZZZZ!!!!

Posted by: ChristianH at January 7, 2010 4:18 PM

I liked Adventureland a lot for what it wasn't. It wasn't over the top, it wasn't contrived, it wasn't painful in it's treatment of characters, and it didn't rely on choices no rational human would make to push the plot forward. It was pretty low key, conflicted and nostalgic, and even treated the wacky borderline park owners as fairly as possible.

Could've used some zombies though. I'm just saying.

Posted by: mrcreosote at January 7, 2010 4:19 PM

Basterds was fun but pales in comparison to his older stuff.

Star Trek has fallen off a bit for me. Still love the energy, but the gaping plot holes get bigger every time I watch it.

Fox should be higher. Great great movie.

500 Days left me unimpressed. Good, not great. Need to see Adventureland. Refuse to watch Away We Go, that beard simply kills me.

District 9 and Up are my two favorites on this list. Both fantastically rewatchable.

Up in the Air/Hurt Locker were very good but kind of a weak year if those were the two best films.

Posted by: Mick J at January 7, 2010 4:27 PM

Woops, I don't know what I'm saying. I haven't seen The Hurt Locker yet either. So, 8/10.

Posted by: ChristianH at January 7, 2010 4:27 PM

I loved Adventureland. It's the first film I've seen in a long time that feels real.

Posted by: Bizarro Sofía at January 7, 2010 4:29 PM

I agree with mrcreosote. If they'd made a movie called Zombieventureland (which, I guess, would really just be Zombieland, but set in the 80s), I probably would've enjoyed it more.

Other than that, I'd say the list is more or less spot-on.

Posted by: Jelinas at January 7, 2010 4:30 PM

Oh, hell yes. Your choices put a hell of a goofy, satisfied grin on my face.

I have to echo the other kate (hi, there!). As much as I got a kick out of (500) Days of Summer, my enjoyment pales in comparison to the love I bear for Away We Go.

Haven't seen Inglourious Basterds or The Hurt Locker yet, but they're steadily making their way up my Netflix cue.

When we described Up, it was a stressful time in the office, plus our copy was very rough. Very, very rough. As in, the last third of the movie consisted of the characters, in these weird, underwear-like onesies, gliding like chess pieces across incomplete backdrops. So I don't have the best memories associated with it. In the interest of fairness, and spurred by Pajiba's good opinion, I've put it near the top of my Netflix cue as well. Okay Up, let's try this again. Show me what you got.

Posted by: ShinyKate at January 7, 2010 4:31 PM

Good list. Adventureland was pleasant, but nothing I need to revisit. Away We Go is just excellent, totally blown away by that one. The Brothers Bloom and Sunshine Cleaning would make my top 10. bump Adventureland and ... something else, because I haven't seen a few of these yet so I'm not sure. Can't wait to see Hurt Locker finally next week.

Zombieland was on the "Best Netflix Rentals" list from yesterday. That one read like the runners up to this list.

The Hangover was good, but not a classic for the ages.

Posted by: TylerDFC at January 7, 2010 4:39 PM

I did not like Up in the Air. Not because George Clooney is getting awards attention for playing George Clooney as interpreted through American Dad's analysis of his acting, but because I just didn't care what happened in the story. I didn't like the characters, I didn't like the set-up, and I didn't like the execution. Why can't the backlash start against this film like it did against Juno? It's the same director and, for me, about the same believability level, so I say they deserve the same treatment.

Posted by: Robert at January 7, 2010 4:52 PM

Four?! I've only seen four of these?!

Ironically enough, I would have seen The Incredible Mr. Fox just this last Tuesday, but the sound quality was so poor, we had to leave and get a refund--what did we rent to watch at home instead? District 9 . So no matter what, I wasn't getting past 4.

I knew my movie watching numbers were pitiful, but I didn't realize it was this pitiful. Must go to more movies.

Posted by: tamatha at January 7, 2010 5:05 PM

Wow, what an incredibly indie/hipster douchebag list of films. I can't believe I'm surprised. The Star Trek reboot was boring as all fuck. I'd rather watch "Behind Enemy Lines 2".

Posted by: Kris at January 7, 2010 5:08 PM

Up just didn't really do it for me. Yeah, I get that the opening sequence is wonderful, and the talking dogs are a quick and easy way to my heart, but the movie achieves a higher level of cartoony than any Pixar offering I have seen, particularly in that third act. It's a good movie; I just don't think it was nearly as transcendent as many seem to believe.

District 9 - again, it's good, but I don't think ideas are boring, and that explosions wrapping did shift the balance a bit too far in the other direction for me.

I don't mean to be a curmudgeon. I just am one.

Posted by: DarthCorleone at January 7, 2010 5:23 PM

I saw 6 movies in the theatre this year, and 4 of them are on this list. I rock.

Posted by: S.K. at January 7, 2010 5:28 PM

I'd rather watch "Behind Enemy Lines 2".

Posted by: Kris at January 7, 2010 5:08 PM

Amen.

It takes a special kind of lemming to fall for something stolen and shat forth by: THE SAME FOLKS WHO BROUGHT YOU TRANSFORMERS 1 AND 2

--------------------------------------------

"...George Clooney is getting awards attention for playing George Clooney as interpreted through American Dad's analysis of his acting..."

Posted by: DarthCorleone at January 7, 2010 5:23 PM

"That arrogant, overrated, limo-riding bastard! He's not even an actor! He just does the same cheesy move every time. Looks down, then looks back up, squinting underneath his eyebrows. And everybody's buying it!"

You are welcome :)

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at January 7, 2010 5:37 PM

I always thought Up In The Air was overrated. I saw it and was unimpressed. Seeing it in the number 2 spot just reinforces how overrated it is.

No Avatar? You have to be kidding me.

Posted by: citizen_cris at January 7, 2010 5:55 PM

Careful there Robert and Darth, at this time last year I said that I didn't like Wall-E. And was promptly jumped by a couple of cyber-fuckwits who apparently liked Wall-E. So I'll keep my opinion to myself this year.

Like fuck I will.

I have no interest in seeing Up. And I don't care if you liked it. And I'm entitled to not give a shit. Feel free to disagree with me. But go fuck yourself with your keyboard if all your going to do is attack my intellect for not agreeing with you. And if that really, really bothers you, then too fucking bad. Go suck off a rabid Rhino.

Posted by: Xtreme at January 7, 2010 6:03 PM

BarbadoSlim >> I would have left it alone, but the fact that you've misattributed me as having made any sort of MacFarlane reference can not stand. His shows are a blight. Not as much of a blight as Transformers, but a blight nonetheless.

Posted by: DarthCorleone at January 7, 2010 6:05 PM

I do kinda love how everyone always undermines their high ground here.

Posted by: Jay at January 7, 2010 6:30 PM

What a staggeringly unimaginative list, guys! I do love seeing Away We Go get some love, though. That movie's the shit.

Posted by: whatBENwatches at January 7, 2010 6:54 PM

I've seen 5 out of 10 and I would be happy to see 4 more. The loser? Away We Go. I don't think squee is my thing. (500) Days of Summer gave me a tummy and a tooth ache. And Zooey Deschanel? Cute, to be sure, but not much range.

Inglorious Basterds was awesome! I adore QT's dialogue shtick.

And finally, the absence of The Hangover is unforgivable.

Posted by: Eyvi at January 7, 2010 7:01 PM

Adventureland underwhelmed. I was expecting an amazing movie based on reviews, but what I saw was meh at best. However, the bananas with the eyepatches did make me laugh.

But District 9 and Away We Go were two of the best films I've seen in a long time. Like TB's wife, I cried at the end of Away, and District left me hoping for a sequel ASAP.

Posted by: MelBivDevoe at January 7, 2010 7:03 PM

Inglorious Basterds might have been a good film if every scene had Christoph Waltz in it. Cut everything else out, because it was painfully bad. I really don't see why everyone fawns over IB, because its merely OK.

Whoever mentioned hating Wall-E, me too. Me too.

And seriously, The Voyage Home was the only original Star Trek film besides Kahn that was watchable. Let's get that straight (no, I'm not a Trekkie!).

Of these, I've seen 10, 9, and 5. The Hurt Locker arrives via Netflix on Tuesday and I'm psyched. I won't ever be seeing Mr. Fox, that's for certain- it holds no appeal for me.

Posted by: EJ at January 7, 2010 7:32 PM

Thank you thank you thank you for including Adventureland. That movie was wonderful.

When I rented it I was expecting some gag-happy, brain-dead nonsense akin to Superbad. That's how it was advertized and that's what I thought I would see. About 20 minutes in I was getting bored. Not one cheap gag. I nearly turned it off -- and then I realized what the movie was really about.

Yeah, it's a coming of age story, but the characters and direction embraces this theme in every way, elevating the movie from simple comedy to something more. Just like the main character, the movie walks a tightrope between childhood and manhood. All the characters conflicts and themes represent some pull of push in one of those directions -- the innocent girl in way over her head with the married man -- the sexy woman and attention of his lust who acts like a child -- his old high school buddy who still punches him in the balls and acts like a teenager -- his new friend, too educated and grown to really have a place with his peers -- and lastly the grown man who still hasn't evolved beyond seducing girls in his mother's basement.

The movie never get's TOO dramatic, but likewise (thankfully) never devolves too far into stoner/boner humor. It takes tastes of both, making a meal of neither -- yet somehow you walk away full. It's like a chocolate/vanilla swirly cone.

By the end of that movie I was SO GLAD it wasn't a cheap, gag-ridden comedy. I felt relieved that the movie I watched was something more. It was better than I expected and I encourage every one of you to watch it again. The acting was spot on, the story was familiar and the script never took any easy steps -- but it was the pitch perfect direction that made the movie for me.

Posted by: superasente at January 7, 2010 7:39 PM

Nadine, I'm confused. You say you're "over" the Tarantino dialog schtick, and yet you loooove Christoph Waltz/Hans Landa. My dear, he was the entire dialog portion of this movie-in-two-parts. If the action scenes were carried by the rest of the cast, then the dialog (other than the barroom scene) was dominated by Landa.

And, Mick J, come on, dude. You're telling me that the opening ten-minute interrogation of Monsiuer Lapadite was lacking? I'd say it was a return to his best work, and some of the best dialog I've ever seen in a movie. I'm not trying to exaggerate. A perfect rendition of cat-fucking-with-cornered-mouse.

P.S. Sorry to be such a hyphen-abusing guy (I was never allowed to use them as a kid.)

P.P.S. Hurt Locker's now become a just-been-added-to-my-list movie.

Posted by: Johnnyboy at January 7, 2010 7:43 PM

Speaking of shaky-cams, Hurt Locker had it and then some. Not a bad a little flick, some intense action sure, but the three leads were cliched and the story sparse. Basterds is QT's best film since Pulp Fiction..talky yes, but in a good way. Waltz is quietly, terrifyingly awesome.

Posted by: stryker1121 at January 7, 2010 7:57 PM

I saw half of these: 1, 3, 5, 7, 9. Guess I just have odd taste in movies.

/ba-dum

Posted by: , at January 7, 2010 9:14 PM

This is the first year I've seen 9 out of 10 movies before the list was published.

I agree with all of them, but I would argue their placement (which is pointless anyway).

Posted by: Doric at January 7, 2010 9:23 PM

'I still can't watch a movie starring that beard.'
Posted by: Jay at January 7, 2010 3:25 PM

P.T. Anderson's gay?

Sorry, low-hanging fruit. I'm too stressed out for maturity.

Posted by: Jo 'Mama' Besser at January 7, 2010 11:20 PM

, - you made a pun that is very similar to the calibre of puns made by my dad. Here is the appropriate response.

*groan*

Posted by: general rhubarb at January 8, 2010 1:18 AM

Zombieland should really be on the list over Adventureland, Sure Adventureland was good.... But Zombieland was.... FREAKING AWESOME!!!!

Posted by: RonnyK at January 8, 2010 3:59 AM

I wish I had two more hands so I could give "Adventureland" 4 THUMBS DOWN!!!

Here's the script:

Main characters mope around, Kristen Stewart tries really, really hard to act, more moping, prevent audience from giving a shit about Stewart's character by making her a spoiled little bitch, waste Ryan Reynolds' comedy chops, roll credits.

As millions have stated before, Martin Starr is the only tolerable thing about this gaping pit of mope. It would make my Bottom 10 of 2009 for the sheer disappointment I felt as Stewart defecated on everything. She is right at home in the "Twilight" series and would not be out of place on "90210" or "Gossip Girl". I haven't seen anyone this overrated since Obama took office. That's right, I said it! He told us what we wanted to hear just like every other candidate tries to do. I have no party affiliation and think Bush was a dangerous moron, but Obama isn't doing what he promised. I am severely disappointed. I thought he was different, but he isn't. Politics fucking suck.

Posted by: Kballs at January 8, 2010 8:58 AM

Serious with the Adventureland??? Cute movie and all, but had to be a pretty crappy year when this is top 10... I agree with someone up there who said for a especific age group it might have a special meaning or something, but pleeeease people. And you think it's a better movie than Inglorious Basterds, for example?!?

Posted by: Sweet Jane at January 8, 2010 9:02 AM

Fine. I'll stop lurking just to say it: Why isn't the Bad Lieutenant: Port of Call New Orleans on this list?? It's a good list but you have way too much cutesy/twee on here. Need more Herzog.

Posted by: Sarah at January 8, 2010 9:23 AM

general rhubarb,

Your dad is obviously a man of quality, taste and intelligence, a gentleman and a scholar with a finely honed sense of humor. It's my pleasure -- no, my HONOR! -- to have met him through you. They should erect a statue of him in the town square.

You should hope and pray and dream that one day you will be half the man he is.

I am sorry you are missing the chromosome that would allow you to appreciate the man's marvelous wit -- I'm certain it's your mother's fault. I believe they're working on that in a lab in Belize, splicing the DNA of howler monkeys into the humor impaired, so maybe there's some speck of hope for you.

Probably not.

Posted by: , at January 8, 2010 10:28 AM

I watched the Hurt Locker last night and was a little underwhelmed. It is really good, but better than District 9? Not a chance. I can still see The Hurt Locker winning big at the Oscars, it just gives off that vibe.

Posted by: schrome at January 8, 2010 10:33 AM

I liked (500) Days of Summer better when it was called All the Real Girls and filmed in NC. Yep. It even had Danny McBride in it, playing a guy named "Bust Ass". Seriously, how much better can it get???

Posted by: boo at January 8, 2010 10:52 AM

And it had Patricia Clarkson.

Posted by: boo at January 8, 2010 10:53 AM

Didn't Coraline come out this year? HMM?

And I turned Adventureland off after about an hour. Did not care for it whatsoever. Everyone I know who has seen it did the same, though to be fair all but one of them were watching it at the same time as me. But it was a general consensus damn it!

Posted by: Mikey Likes It at January 8, 2010 11:09 AM

Or.. LAST year. Damn it, I wrote a check properly yesterday, I knew I'd still forget what year it is SOMEWHERE.

Posted by: Mikey Likes It at January 8, 2010 11:10 AM

No Avatar? You have to be kidding me.

Posted by: citizen_cris at January 7, 2010 5:55 PM
-----------
Couldn't agree more.

Posted by: sosumi at January 8, 2010 11:24 AM

Great list.

Posted by: Caz at January 8, 2010 12:16 PM

Adeventureland: Boring and disappointing. However, it did enforce my belief that Kristen Stewart cannot act.

Posted by: K8WMA at January 8, 2010 12:23 PM

Adventureland: Boring and disappointing. However, it did enforce my belief that Kristen Stewart cannot act.

Good list.

Posted by: K8WMA at January 8, 2010 12:23 PM

I'm a little surprised at Zombieland and The Hangover not being on the list, but completely agree with the exclusion of Avatar. Avatar was a lot of fun to watch but it is half a movie at best. What there is, is probably the best that has ever been done. But it is missing the story half so falls short.

Posted by: EricD at January 8, 2010 12:34 PM

I thought Zombieland was the funniest movie of the year and it would have been on my personal favorites list but this is a great list anyway.It does seem to reflect the tone of the website. I'm happy that The Hangover and Avatar are not on this list. They didn't belong here.

Posted by: becks at January 8, 2010 1:26 PM

Zombieland > Adventureland

always

forever

amen

Posted by: mike at January 8, 2010 1:56 PM

You know, for all the "amazing" CGI on display this year, none of it got me nearly as geeked out as the simple effect of colors refracting thru the balloons and onto walls and surfaces in Up

Something so simple, so elegant, so poetic.

Posted by: renaldo at January 8, 2010 2:44 PM

Everyone with the Avatar love, can you please explain to me why? I will preface this by saying that I saw it and I liked it and it was genuinely entertaining, but certainly nowhere near the "groundbreaking" or "original" tags that have been thrown around to describe it.

I mean, really, why? What was so great about it that we haven't seen before? Yes, the special effects were great, but special effects are almost always great now. The colors were pretty and all, but that's the only thing I saw different about it from most video games. The avatars themselves were cool, especially when thinking of the actors who played all the blue people and the similarities in the facial structures and whatnot, but it stopped at "cool," for me.

(Spoilers, I guess?) And the plot, oh the plot. I saw the movie because a friend wanted to, but I went into it having seen just the preview and knowing with absolute certainty that I had seen this movie before. The plot wasn't a bad one, not at all. A good one, in fact. But it was also good when it was called by its original names: "Ferngully" and "Dances with Wolves" and more than anything else: "Pocahontas."

Jake Sully--Cap't John Smith
Neytiri--Pocahontas
Eytukan--Chief Powhatan
Tsu'Tey--Kocoum
Tree of Voices--Grandmother Willow
Unobtanium(side note:seriously?)--gold

Avatar is Pocahontas with different animation.

Posted by: Kate at January 8, 2010 2:53 PM

Hahaha. The Hurt Locker is good but definitely not best of the year material. I guess you're just making up for not finding a single woman who you could list as best person of the decade. You try so hard and fail so miserably pajiba.

Posted by: tinyfish at January 8, 2010 4:56 PM

Kate - Regarding Avatar - amazing visuals, compelling (though, admittedly, not very original) story, likeable heroes, nasty villains, sweet love story, a few laughs, a few tears - what's not to like? I left the movie feeling like I got my money's worth ($14!) and then some. Can't say the same thing about a number of the other movies on the list.

Posted by: sosumi at January 8, 2010 5:15 PM

Oh no, I *liked* it. I just don't think it deserves a spot on a best of anything list, nor should it get award noms for anything other than visuals.

I haven't seen Fox, Hurt Locker, or District 9, and though I wasn't all about 500 days or Adventureland, I don't think I would replace either one w/ Avatar. But I guess if someone else did, I wouldn't quibble.

Posted by: Kate at January 8, 2010 6:39 PM

2009, I didn't get it. If this is the top 10 of the year by a website who's opinion I trust, then it was not a good year. My main beef is Inglourious Basterds and Up in the Air.

Inglourious Basterds as three short, separate films was really solid. Nothing can be taken away from Christoph Waltz. He was amazing and had amazing, well written scenes to help unpack that performance, but I'll cut to the chase: We don't watch movies to be lied to. We suspend belief if we trust the film.

After seeing the savage soul of the Nazi Party displayed in Schindler's List, it's masturbatory to cheer the same atrocity done fictitiously. Tarantino needs to get Bender back because his dialogue is excellent, but his crafting of a story is juvenile. He's unbalanced and it's showing. The casting was insanely horrible as well.

As far as Up in the Air, I think it's a slap in the face to show people hope then smother it for the sake of being relevant. It's tough times out there? Wow. That's like saying the Nazis are bad and retarded people can overcome the odds!

People go to movies to escape problems. I think that Up in the Air's marketing is shameless. Like the Nazi's in "Bastards" they are being lured into a movie, then getting shot with a "reality" bullet. Who needs it? The relevancy of the situation is presenting itself clearly enough and any artist would realize they are painting by numbers if they felt it needed to be expressed.

That's being said, I think the Hurt Locker was amazing. But if this is the rest of what was good, then I don't need to bother with last year anymore.

Posted by: John at January 8, 2010 7:10 PM

$14?? I assume you saw 3-D, but even so, where do you live??

Posted by: Kate at January 8, 2010 7:10 PM

I agree with "The Hurt Locker". The rest of the list blows.

Posted by: James S at January 9, 2010 12:57 AM

John >> I disagree with much of what you said, but the generalization "People go to movies to escape problems" deserves comment. Put the qualifier "some" before it, and then your argument is valid and correct but obviously not universal. I go to movies for many different reasons. Frequently my reasoning is exactly the opposite: to be confronted with problems and - if the film is done well - further understand and empathize with various facets of the human condition.

Posted by: DarthCorleone at January 9, 2010 1:55 PM

Kate >> Yes, the Avatar plot is not terribly complex or original, but this whole Pocahontas schtick - while accurate - seems to me to be a case of people's wanting to take down the "movies will never be the same" claim. I truly think we could tear apart the story in such a manner for almost any movie - not just Avatar. How many movies could we break down to the simple "Boy meets girl, etc." trope? In basic narrative structure, there is very little (if anything) new under the sun, and Avatar follows one of those familiar stories we know well closely. Simply put, as Roger Ebert frequently opines: it's not what a movie is about, but how it is about it.

For me the story was very familiar, but it was executed well enough to enthrall me. Admittedly, I've always been an eco/green sympathizer, so it probably had extra resonance for me. I also found my inner ten-year-old seriously craving some action figures, and it's been a while since a movie made me feel that.

Beyond that, I'd say your dismissal of "special effects are always great now" takes a lot for granted with respect to Avatar and undermines some rather incredible artistry. In my opinion the visual effects therein truly raised the bar. They were immersive and subtle, and there was never a point at which I was taken out of the film thinking those creatures and that world were a mere visual effect. Given the percentage of what we see on screen that doesn't actually exist, I think that's fairly amazing.

Posted by: DarthCorleone at January 9, 2010 2:06 PM

But that's my point. It was too formulaic to be considered one of the best movies of 2009. I didn't go into it thinking that I was going to try and wrack my brain to find similarities between this movies and ones before, I went into it wanting to enjoy a sci-fi flick and sat there as character after character and storyline after storyline from other movies jumped out at me. And for a movie many years in the making that was advertised to be and was banking on being something "completely original from the mind of James Cameron," that was a big failure in my eyes.

I'm not saying formulaic movies can't be good. Sure, other movies on this list certainly have a fair amount of formula to them. But to be a great movie, it has to bring something new to the table, and this one just didn't. Relying on great visual effects does not make an otherwise cliche movie fantastic, it just makes it decent.

Posted by: Kate at January 9, 2010 3:58 PM

DarthCorleone >> You are totally correct. I didn't want to make a sweeping generalization, but got caught up in the moment. Thanks for the comment and acknowledgment.

Posted by: John at January 9, 2010 6:02 PM

To address those of you complaining about the lack of Avatar: what the FUCK? Besides the amazing visual effects of course, everything about that film sucked. It was boring, unoriginal, and the characters were stupid and flat. The development of Sully was awful and unbelievable. Everything was predictable.

Visual effects have not, and will never, carry a movie beyond an elderly and imbalanced stoop. I can't believe I'm having to say this on here in addition to raving at my ridiculous adolescent peers who have deemed it "da moooost bwyooteeful stowee EVAR!"

This sounds bitter, but I hate Avatar because it sucks yet here are people worshipping it.

Posted by: ladywhiskers at January 9, 2010 6:37 PM

I must see Adventureland, I really am a sucker for those bromance coming of age movies. Seth Rogen must be doing well for himself creatively these days huh?

Posted by: ph at January 10, 2010 4:05 PM

Oddly, I really liked all of these movies but Hurt Locker was my least favorite. Felt more like a Rolling Stone article than a story rich enough for an entire movie. Enjoyed it, but Up in the Air was my favorite, followed by Up.

Posted by: Borg at January 10, 2010 11:00 PM

Kristen Stewart's best work was in Zathura, sadly, and I don't see it getting any better.

Basterds? Not that great for my tastes, certainly it's no Pulp Fiction. I'm too wedded to history to "escape" on this topic. I'd take most R. Rodriguez movie instead. YMMV

Up was all that. I teared up in front of my 10 year old.

Posted by: MarkM at January 11, 2010 2:59 PM

Kate >> No worries. I agree to disagree. You just asked for an explanation of why I like the movie, and I gave it to you.

Posted by: DarthCorleone at January 11, 2010 3:18 PM

I've only seen most of three of the movies on this list. And if they made the top ten I guess I'll be skipping the rest. I think I'll rape myself with a garden gnome instead.

That Tarantino suckfest extraordinaire... Jesus. Made it through an hour and a half of inane banter before we finally broke into fits of laughter. One in the group exclaimed loudly "If that Nazi pastes a card on his forehead with spit we are so outta here!" Someone commented on the Masterpiece Theater look of the film for the 100th time. Then three people started snoring in time to the beat of the "dialog". Good thing too since Tarantino doesn't even have his usual trademark soundtrack. At all. Someone did say the end was awesome and we missed it. So was the Plague. Missed that too. Fuck.

Star Trek. Shit Sandwich.

District 9. Showed promise. Until the popcorn shrimp started making nice to the human. Maybe one day I'll watch the end. Or do laundry. Same diff.

Someone had that balloon/house cartoon on over x-mas. Honestly I was too busy trying to get my dick sucked by the naughty bit-o-crumpet with the mind blowing weed to care.


Pajiba my ass.

Posted by: Ignatius J. Reilly at January 11, 2010 4:07 PM

I don't know whether I've been a victim of expectations set too high, since it was praised so much on Pajiba, but I have to admit that I was extremely disappointed by The Hurt Locker. Needless to say I am quite amazed it ranked 1st on this list.

I didn't get at all why this movie was supposed to be good. To me it was just... boring, so boring actually my friends and I decided to stop wasting our lifetime on it after 2/3 so we just fast forwarded the rest of the movie.

But everyone else seems to think this movie was the mother of awesome, so erm, could anyone explain why you actually like it so much? Do you have to be American to get it?

Posted by: lastdaylight at January 12, 2010 12:37 PM

i will say that Zombieland moved me out of depression and into happiness. I was wishing it to be oscar worthy, but oscar shmoscar. For me, it was a big hit.

Posted by: amandita at January 14, 2010 3:49 AM

Thank you for not putting Avatar.

That being said, I would put Zombieland over Adventureland. Especially if you're gonna have 500 Days of Summer AND Away We Go on this Top Ten list. Too many freakin Indie Romantic Comedies.

Thank you for not putting Avatar. Did I say that already?

Posted by: Littlejon2001 at February 1, 2010 11:46 AM

I'm not the biggest war flick fan in the world but I have to say that this film is completely outstanding! The way the tension develops during certain scenes will have you hooked. The movie in general is visually incredible ; add to that a amazing cast and a solid script and you have yourself one hell of a movie which deserves the hype it got along with all the awards it one. A real gem of a film!

Posted by: Sherlyn Water at June 17, 2010 5:49 PM

I understand that the major to choose if I want to get into dentistry school has to be biology, chemistry, biochemistry, or any science related major. But will a major in nursing works as well? As long as I do well in my science classes? I am planning to get my R.N. in nursing and continue onto dentistry school.

Posted by: what are veneers? at June 29, 2010 12:01 AM

Wonderful to read!

Posted by: Crazy Taxi Game at July 28, 2010 7:05 AM

Die Puerta de Europa Türme sind zwei Twin-Bürogebäude in Madrid.

Posted by: Luigi Fulk at February 9, 2011 3:00 PM


















Viral Hits

>> Pajiba Movie Posters

>> Pop Culture's 20 Greatest Dancing GIFs

>> Mindhole Blowers

>> The 100 Greatest Insults of All Time

>> The "Other" 100 Greatest Movie Quotes

>> The 100 Greatest Movie Threats of All Time

>> The Sean Bean Death Reel

>> Chicks Dig Beards: It's Science

>> The Coolest TV Show Title Sequences

>> The Most Rewatchable Movies

>> The Most Expensive Movies of All Time