free counter with statistics The Greatest Television Couple Ever | Pajiba - Scathing Reviews for Bitchy People

post04.jpg

Guides | October 8, 2009 | Comments (105)


After five seasons of flirting, of navigating each other’s other relationships, and after a courtship that led to an engagement, a new house, and eventually, Pam’s pregnancy, Jim Halpert and Pam Beesly are set to marry on tonight’s episode of “The Office.” Here’s what you can expect: Kelly will probably try to hook up with Ryan; Andy will probably try to make a few moves on the new receptionist; and Michael Scott, undoubtedly, will make an unwanted, embarrassing, and uncomfortable speech. But here is what will not happen: Neither Jim nor Pam will get cold feet. No one will utter the wrong name in the vows; and the wedding absolutely will not, under no circumstances, be broken off, postponed, or cancelled. By the end of tonight’s episode, Jim and Pam Halpert will leave for their honeymoon, and the audience will be left with a huge lump in their throat.

Jim and Pam may not be the most realistic couple of television (that honor, in my mind, belongs to Coach and Tami Taylor), and whether you agree or not with my assessment that they are the greatest couple in television history, there is no denying, at least, that they are the sweetest. Their relationship began five years ago, in the Scranton office of Dunder Mifflin. Pam Beesly was in an eight-year relationship with a warehouse worker, Roy Anderson, a relationship that had begun in high school, and had led to a three-year open-ended engagement. Pam was a reticent receptionist, often nervous, and perpetually frustrated with her boss, Michael Scott, his screw-ups and his sexual overtures. Jim Halpert, a salesman at Dunder Mifflin, had been in love with Pam since the beginning — a thief of glances through the first few episodes of “The Office.” Their relationship began innocently — they started out as mildly flirtatious best friends, prone to playing pranks on Dwight. And then in the first episode of season two, Pam won a Dundie award, got drunk, let her guard down, and kissed Jim.

Everything after that was inevitable.

Granted, there were obstacles along the way — Pam had to break off her engagement to Roy. Jim left, for a time, to the Stamford branch of Dunder Mifflin, and even had a significant relationship with Karen — which resulted in a period where Jim and Pam were distant. But since Pam announced to Jim at the beach that she’d called off her engagement to Roy for Jim, and Jim left an opportunity to be a branch manager elsewhere to go on a date with Pam, it’s been amazingly, sweetly, generously, wonderfully hiccup free since.

What’s remarkable about Jim and Pam’s relationship, however, is that — unlike other television couples — theirs has never been characterized by bickering, cheating, reservations about one another, fear of commitment, “breaks,” Hallmark sentiments, big speeches, or even torrid sex in a supply closet. Jim and Pam’s relationship has been about small moments: Holding hands, Pam falling asleep on Jim’s shoulder, air high-fives, knowing glances, sandwiches in the break room, moral support, and kindness. Unbelievable amazing, wonderful unrelenting kindness.

The biggest reason why Jim and Pam are the greatest television couple ever, however, is because of the care that Greg Daniels and the writers of “The Office,” have taken with the couple. Crucial is the way the writers have used our own expectations of sitcom relationships — created by everything from “Moonlighting” to “Friends” — and turned them against us. It’s the reason, in my mind, that the Jim and Pam episodes since they have gotten together have been the best of the series. It’s because, based on those sitcom conventions, we think where we know their relationship is heading, but Daniels flips those expectations. Take, for instance, the arc where Pam moved, briefly, to New York City go to go art school. She ended up becoming friends with another male at the school. And from what we know of sitcom storylines, the push and pull, and the desire of showrunners to keep the couple apart as long as possible, I think a lot of us expected that this guy would come between Jim and Pam, even for a brief few episodes. Jim, growing ever insecure, even contemplates rushing to New York to see her, to put his mind at ease, and to erase his doubt, but ultimately realizes that “they aren’t that couple.” A few episodes later, we’re presented with another sitcom obstacle when Pam realizes that she’ll never make it as an artist in Scranton. What are our expectations? Knowing Jim, we perhaps expect that he’ll sacrifice, that he’ll give up his relationship with Pam if it means her achieving her career dreams. Because he loves her that much. Or, perhaps, Pam will break it off with Jim because she doesn’t want a relationship to get between her and her desired profession. Because at the end of the day, she can’t bear to be a receptionist any longer.

In the end, though, she quits school, and returns to Scranton the “wrong way.” Because she loves Jim. Because jobs, professions, and careers are great and all, but her real dream is to be with Jim.

And that’s what we do, folks. We sacrifice. We sacrifice comfort. We sacrifice our cushy living arrangements. We sacrifice our dreams for better dreams. Because when a couple loves each other, when they really fucking love each other, long distances can be gapped, jobs can be changed, ambitions can be rechanneled, and we can settle for imperfect houses.

Jim and Pam may be the first television couple ever to truly embrace that notion. “Settling” for jobs at a crappy paper company in a strip-mall city in the middle of Pennsylvania isn’t really “settling” if it means being together, being in love, and possibly living that happily ever after. Of course, happily ever afters rarely make for good television, but most of us have seen enough of “The Office,” and Jim and Pam’s relationship to know that they aren’t like other television couples. “The Office” is the first sitcom, perhaps, to prove that you don’t have to keep a couple apart to keep your viewers interested. Romance is more than big you-make-me-a-better-man reconciliation speeches. It really can be about the small things, about sitting in lawn chairs and watching fireworks together. It’s about making each other laugh. And about finding comfort in simply being.

Jim and Pam belong together. They always have. They always will. And tonight’s episode is about more than just a big ratings-grabbing wedding. It’s the culmination — the crowning achievement — of five seasons of missed opportunities, of heart-ache and heartbreak, and of the smallest, sweetest romantic gestures ever recorded for a television sitcom. And regardless of what happens in the future of “The Office,” Jim and Pam are heady reminders that there is passion in kindness, and love in friendship.

Cheers to the Happy Couple.


Stitch N'Bitch News | Southland Gets the Axe



Comments

mulder and scully?
kermitt and miss peggy?

Posted by: carrie at October 8, 2009 3:03 PM

I appreciate Pam and Jim's homage to Tv's real greatest couple, Tim and Dawn.

Posted by: becks at October 8, 2009 3:05 PM

Bleaaaacchhhh!!!!!!

[Stares blankly into the computer screen] "Mumble, mumble ... stupid comment". -Dwight

Posted by: Bluesilver at October 8, 2009 3:08 PM

...a young girl growing old
trying to make herself a bride...

Posted by: laredo at October 8, 2009 3:09 PM

Awww, Dustin. You giant softie. You've made me inexplicably happy and maybe a tad bit misty.

I am now more annoyed than ever that I won't be able to see tonight's episode until tomorrow.

Posted by: myysharona (formerly Sharon) at October 8, 2009 3:12 PM

I'll TELL you who the best couple in the history of TV are so we can put this thread away:

Jonathan and Jennifer Hart.

Now you can all just shut the fuck up.

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at October 8, 2009 3:13 PM

You ... You do know that these are *pretend* people, right, DR?

(Hee.)

Posted by: Anna von Beaverpuppet at October 8, 2009 3:13 PM

That so made me mist.

What a wonderful expression of why the Jim & Pam relationship is simply mesmerizing.

*sniffles*

I'm getting ka-flemped. Talk amongst yourselves.

Rhode Island is neither a road, nor an island. Discuss.

Posted by: Kayanne at October 8, 2009 3:15 PM

Really?

Al and Peggy Bundy?
Dan and Roseanne Conner?

You choose Jim and Pam over some of the greatest TV couples of all time. Why? Because they are perfect? Nobody wants to see a perfect couple on TV because that shit doesn't exist in real life. It would make our lives even more fucking depressing to see this couple that does no wrong. Who goes against the odds to find themselves perfectly happy because they are perfectly gross. Give me a break.

Do you like to walk down the street and see the happy couple? All wide eyed and bushy tailed? Holding hands? Whispering in each others ear? Cute little kisses? Of course you do, because in a few months they won't be doing that anymore. When they go out to dinner they are just going to sit there in silence and eat. Maybe talk about their day to which neither one will really listen because they don't give a fuck. Its the same shit that happened to them the day before. Maybe Peg just cheated on Wyatt. That's the new news...hurrah!

I wouldn't follow, or be interested, in a couple that didn't have any pitfalls. Who didn't fight. Who didn't have challenges. Who didn't disagree about what was right. Why? That's fucking boring. How does cute and happy make for great TV? Are you watching the "Care Bears" every night before you go to sleep? Get outta here with your perfect and cute "Greatest Television Couple Ever."

Blargh. Barf. *hacks up hairball*

Cute and perfect...that's like watching a movie with a couple that's been married for thirty years that has wild and crazy break the bed sex. Yeah...like that happens. My boss once told me the types of sex in a relationship.
First: its anywhere and everywhere like little teenagers.
Second: its planned sex. Tuesday night, me and you baby.
Third: hallway sex. As you pass each other in the hallway its "Fuck you" and "Fuck you."

Posted by: DeistBrawler at October 8, 2009 3:18 PM

Jim and Pam kill the comedy of the show every time they're together. Remember Cheers? It was the Woody and Kelly duo. Sucked the life out of every episode.
I know they exist solely to draw in the people who expect more Rom in their Com.

Comedy killer, run, run, run away...

Dwight needs a PLAN to get them both fired, or killed. FACT: Jim thinks of nothing but
being perfect and mugging for the camera. FACT: Pam thinks of nothing but Jim and his perfectness. Rhetorical QUESTION: How cunning of a TRAP must you have to take them both out? ANSWER to Rhetorical QUESTION: Not very. FACT: Jim can't go ten minutes without staring stupidly at the camera. RIG a laser-camera to fry his retinas the moment he looks in its direction. Did you know that retinas are ninety-eight-point-three-five-five percent water? Now for the BITCH. As everyone knows, ALL women employ a hidden self-destruct code which can be TRIGGERED by repeating their first name to them THREE TIMES BACKWARDS. Equip the office stereo player with the Yeah Yeah Yeahs...


Posted by: Bluesilver at October 8, 2009 3:18 PM

I'm glad my parents are more like Jim and Pam than, say, Ross and Rachel. Because of their stable relationship, we have a great family, a stable house, and I've never wanted to murder my parents with a pick-axe, which is something I'd expect Ross and Rachel's daughter, Emma, to do one day, after the upteenth breakup.

Posted by: George at October 8, 2009 3:19 PM

Although, I'd have to say the Huxtables were the greatest couple in TV history. Not only were they already together and totally in love from beginning to end of the show, but even when there kids did the stupidest shit you could think of, (I'm looking at you, Theo), they held it together, and always found a humorous way to deal with it.

If you can't laugh at the stupidity of your own children, you wont be a good parent.

Posted by: George at October 8, 2009 3:23 PM

"Because when a couple loves each other, when they really fucking love each other, long distances can be gapped, jobs can be changed, ambitions can be rechanneled, and we can settle for imperfect houses."

Holy crap. This was a much needed quote as my husband and I are closing on our first home tomorrow (which is admittedly pretty shitty) and I am sitting at my day job (which is also shitty) - and sometimes it's easy to forget that I do all this to build a life with him, and I'd do it all over again. Thanks for this.

Posted by: Kari at October 8, 2009 3:24 PM

I love this myself. I think that they're relationship is fantastic. I hate couples who are given obstacles just for drama's sake, for me they're pretty realistic. Love this. I can't WAIT for tonight.

Posted by: Julie at October 8, 2009 3:25 PM

I too am tearing up at this. Screw the naysayers, thanks for recognizing everything that is so awesome about this great TV couple! They are by far my favorite TV couple EVER. Season 2 of the Office remains one of my favorite television seasons of any show ever, and this is largely to do with the intense and genuinely bittersweet relationship between Jim and Pam at that time. It is SO hugely satisfying that the show hasn't completely screwed up everything that was promised for those two in the early seasons. I've been looking forward to this episode for years!!!
WOOHOOOO!!!!!!

Posted by: Eva at October 8, 2009 3:25 PM

Wow, Dustin. Very strong piece. I don't watch The Office very often, and I was chomping at the bit to jump in here with candidates to trump to your greatest-television-couple proclamation. Once I read what you had to say, though, I will simply pay sincere respect to your reasoning and sentiment.

Posted by: DarthCorleone at October 8, 2009 3:27 PM

THEIR. This is what happens when I have the Phillies game on in the background :)

Posted by: Julie at October 8, 2009 3:28 PM

Jim and Pam are what ground The Office and make it more than a bunch of wacky characters. They're not perfect but they're not mumbling conspiracy dudes, pop-culture obsessed stalkers or anal-retentive cat ladies, either. They are the perfect foil for the crazies. Without them, the series would have jumped the shark a very long time ago.

Posted by: Wednesday at October 8, 2009 3:28 PM

I have seen about 5 episodes total of The Office, and they just so happened to be several of the ones mentioned here. How weird is that?
I am glad they are getting married, I might just watch it online. Hope for us jaded old harpies out here IRL.

BSlim: Word.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uSn9xPnjLps

"When they met, it was MURDER."

also, "She is one lady who knows how to take care of herself."

Wow, is that ever a double entendre.

Posted by: Lindsey with an 'e' at October 8, 2009 3:29 PM

Oh, I'm just gonna get stupid drunk come back here and start shit. See you in a bit.

x

Posted by: TSF at October 8, 2009 3:29 PM

Whatever, Jenna Fisher is so barf-inducingly mealy-mouthed and mousey gross I just want to punch myself in the eyes even listening to her talk. She was on Fresh Air the other day and I nearly drove my car into a guard rail out of rage.
She gives me the creeping willies with her bug eyes and stiff jaw. EW.

Dan and Roseanne are the most realistic couple on TV ever.

Posted by: AM at October 8, 2009 3:29 PM

P.S. I kind of forgot tonight is the wedding episode, and I'm super excited about it now.

Jim and Pam kill the comedy of the show every time they're together.

I disagree with this assessment. I think there's not too much focus on the two of them as a couple, or on their relationship. I think it nicely balances the antics of Michael and Dwight. If it was just that for half an hour every week, I'd have been bored of the show 4 1/2 years ago. But with the moments of their sweetness in the mix, I'm still in.

Posted by: Anna von Beaverpuppet at October 8, 2009 3:30 PM

Not realistic? Pshhh

I have my own real life Jim Halpert, thank you very much.

Posted by: Kate at October 8, 2009 3:31 PM

Clearly you have forgotten the real best television couple ever. George and Susan (Seinfeld).

Posted by: Cindy at October 8, 2009 3:32 PM

I hate to say this, because this article is touching and beautiful and sweet and all of the things I've been trying to articulate for years about why I love Pam/Jim and "The Office" in general-- but seriously, Pam looks like the living dead in that header pic. It's distracting.

KILL IT WITH FIRE

Posted by: antoinette jeanine at October 8, 2009 3:33 PM

I'm getting ka-flemped. Talk amongst yourselves.

Posted by: Kayanne at October 8, 2009 3:15 PM

Well, that just blew any notion I might have had that Kayanne was a Jewish name... or am I wrong to correlate "ka-flemped" with "verklempt"?

Anyhow, this is quite the litmus test post Rowles has devised. The raw emotional energy in the responses from both the romantics and the cynics is practically radiating from my screen. And BSlim is a Hart to Hart fan? Wow. Now I can't wait for the obligatory riposte about Stefanie Powers' rack...

What, no love for Archie and Edith Bunker?

Posted by: Che Grovera at October 8, 2009 3:35 PM

I do have to say, however, that it irks me a little to see Mulder and Scully as the first counterexample. I'd go so far as to nominate them for as the worst romantic couple in television history. (Feel free to nominate them for the best non-romantic partnership in television history, though.) Shipping ruined X-Files. I was not necessarily opposed to their getting together, but the shift in focus killed the show.

Posted by: DarthCorleone at October 8, 2009 3:37 PM

For some reason the phrase "I'm looking at you Theo" has me in stitches. Everyone around me thinks I'm weird.

Posted by: becks at October 8, 2009 3:39 PM

Well, that just blew any notion I might have had that Kayanne was a Jewish name... or am I wrong to correlate "ka-flemped" with "verklempt"?

You could have told me that before I'd gotten my tattoo.

Posted by: Kayanne at October 8, 2009 3:43 PM

Cheers to the happy couple and to a well-written article.






Now, where's my drink?!

Posted by: mswas at October 8, 2009 3:53 PM

I am not positive about greatest, but certainly the one who's story I have enjoyed the most.

I never get excited about things like tv marriage, pregnancy, or baby switches. It feels too soapy, but I think that Pam and Jim were handled so well that I am excited about tonight's wedding.

Posted by: DemonWaterPolo at October 8, 2009 3:55 PM

Everyone around me thinks I'm weird.

Posted by: becks at October 8, 2009 3:39 PM

That may be true, but are you sure of the reason?

Posted by: Lindsey with an 'e' at October 8, 2009 3:57 PM

As long as it's not on your forehead I think you'll be okay, Kayanne.

Posted by: Mr. M. at October 8, 2009 3:58 PM

Greatest TV couple of all time?

Lucy and Ricki Ricardo.

End of story!

Posted by: BWeaves at October 8, 2009 3:59 PM

Oh, I'm definitely not arguing with them Lindsey.

Spoiler Alert: DarthCorleone is the hilarious Mr. M from the eloquent eloquence thread.

Posted by: becks at October 8, 2009 4:01 PM

Well, they never cheated on each other. Roy and Karen can go fuck themselves.

And this "Because when a couple loves each other, when they really fucking love each other, long distances can be gapped, jobs can be changed, ambitions can be rechanneled, and we can settle for imperfect houses." is some cow-eyed bullshit. The only place love conquers all is in romance novels fat women but in line at the Shop-Ko. Come back in five years when Pam has come to resent Jim because she punted her own dreams to be with a paunchy paper salesmen with no ambition. Let's see if he still wants to mush his face against that lantern jaw after Karen gets promoted to vice president, gets engaged to a Philadelphia Eagles defensive end and wins a BET Image award.

Posted by: Tracer Bullet at October 8, 2009 4:06 PM

Mr. M,
So people don't care if you misspell tramp stamps?

I wonder if Jim and Pam would get matching tattoos? I feel like that's pretty classy.

Posted by: Kayanne at October 8, 2009 4:08 PM

Although I agree with Rowles, regardless of your position on "best couple" you have to see the truth in the statement that shows create some seriously dumbass obstacles to keep screen couples apart. Why? Because a happy couple can't be interesting?

Many of the "will they/won't they" couples fizzled out after hooking up because sexual tension was all they had. Did David & Maddie or Sam & Diane ever have anything beyond raging hormones? In a way you could say those writing staffs or show runners were lazy for not developing those characters better.

I think the most interesting couple interaction that I have seen was when Luke & Lorelai finally got together on Gilmore Girls. Two people who truly love each other can still have significant amounts of drama just in trying to overcome their own differences.....and those two had VERY different personalities. It was wonderful watching them try and figure out how to grow and compromise. Of course, when Amy Sherman-Palladino got pissed at the WB, she sabotaged the show by creating some of the most stupid obstacles ever (Luke gets a 14 yr old daughter, Loralei marries her ex, etc) but that is a story for another day.

Jim and Pam seem like real people because those characters have depth. I bet we'll see them struggle a bit and we'll nod knowingly because we will be able to relate. Hey, the first year is supposedly the hardest right? We shall see and I'll guarantee we'll still laugh the whole time.

Posted by: swingdude at October 8, 2009 4:13 PM

That was beautifully put Dustin, and to all of those quibbling about love not conquering all, well you're right in your way. Love doesn't, people who are in love do. But the great Perry Cox said it better than I ever could:

"Relationships don't work the way they do on television and in the movies. Will they? Won't they? And then they finally do, and they're happy forever. Gimme a break. Nine out of ten of them end because they weren't right for each other to begin with, and half of the ones who get married get divorced anyway, and I'm telling you right now, through all this stuff I have not become a cynic. I haven't. Yes, I do happen to believe that love is mainly about pushing chocolate covered candies and, y'know, in some cultures, a chicken. You can call me a sucker, I don't care, because I do believe in it. Bottom line is: it's couples who are truly right for each other wade through the same crap as everybody else, but the big difference is they don't let it take them down. One of those two people will stand up and fight for that relationship every time. If it's right, and they're real lucky, one of them will say something."

Posted by: Steven Lloyd Wilson at October 8, 2009 4:16 PM

Dustin, if I ever get married I want you to be my matron of honor and give the toast. You have to wear a blue dress though.

Posted by: Nicole at October 8, 2009 4:18 PM

becks >> I do not know what inspired that statement, but I assure you I have not resorted to playing the internet doppelganger game on this site. At least not yet.

Posted by: DarthCorleone at October 8, 2009 4:21 PM

DarthCorleone is not Mr. M

Posted by: the internet doppelganger at October 8, 2009 4:26 PM

@ Posted by: Steven Lloyd Wilson at October 8, 2009 4:16 PM

{sniff} You had me at Perry Cox.

Posted by: Lindsey with an 'e' at October 8, 2009 4:38 PM

Two things.

1) That was sort of creepy, internet doppelganger. A long time ago on a message board far, far away, I had a run-in with a doppelganger. It all culminated in my futilely shouting to the heavens (and in a thread on that message board) for some sort of answer as to who was who and who was real. I never received my answer, but I still look back fondly on those halcyon days of being toyed with by that doppelganger. Sometimes I wonder if she was my dream girl (assuming she was a she, for which there was evidence).

2) Once someone brings up Sam and Diane, then I am compelled to weigh in.

Sam and Diane first hooked up at the end of season 1 / the beginning of season 2. This idea that the show fizzled upon bringing them together is a frequently perpetuated myth. Certainly their relationship was tumultuous with an on-again/off-again quality to it, but there was much more to it than mere sexual tension, even if they were both very hormonally driven in their attraction. To claim otherwise is to ignore some of the very best episodes of the show in which their characters and their relationship were developed beyond mere sex. (That's odd; I qualified sex with "mere." That doesn't seem right at all.) I'll gladly cite some of those episode specifically if you would like me to look them up. I'll acknowledge their parting could have been handled better, but seasons 2 through 5 of Cheers embodies some of the best sitcom material in television history, and this all happened after their initial pairing. Their chemistry was both outstanding and believable.

David and Maddie, however, did produce an immediate disaster in the quality of the show upon their pairing with the dissolution of their sexual tension, and this did not happen until much closer to the end of Moonlighting's run. Was it the end of season three? I don't recall. (Both Moonlighting and the Sam/Diane years of Cheers were five years in duration.)

Posted by: DarthCorleone at October 8, 2009 4:46 PM

Damn, back to the drawing board.

Posted by: becks at October 8, 2009 4:49 PM

becks >> Now I have to ask. Did you say "hilarious" sarcastically, meaning that I was a suspect because you think that I'm not funny at all and am desperate for internet attention by way of creating different handles? Because that sounds a little desperate. And sad. Do I come off as desperate and sad?

Maybe just neurotic.

Posted by: DarthCorleone at October 8, 2009 4:58 PM

Team Dwangela!

Posted by: Jennifer at October 8, 2009 4:59 PM

Spike and Drusilla! Ah, the romance....

"I want Dru back, I've just gotta be the man I was, the man she loved. I'm gonna do what I shoulda done in the first place: I'll find her, wherever she is, tie her up, torture her until she likes me again. Love's a funny thing."

Posted by: Tarn at October 8, 2009 5:01 PM

let's hope it's better than last week, which was the worst episode in office history. i hope that after the wedding the show can get some good subplots going for the minor characters, who make me laugh much more than jim and pam. even the hilarious michael is less funny when jim is involved. sure, j&p are sweet, but i watch the office to LAUGH. she used to be funny... don't know what happened. oh yeah, too much JIM.

Posted by: celery at October 8, 2009 5:01 PM

Eh. I'll watch because I feel comfortable with the characters, but I couldn't give two shits about Jim and Pam. However, I am interested in seeing how they get out of the corner they've painted themselves into with the pregnancy. Once again, I don't give a shit about Jim, Pam, or the baby, I just think the writers have fucked themselves. What happens when she has it? She ain't going back to the office. No, the only way outta this one is miscarriage or abortion. Miscarriage would be too much of a downer. I'm rooting for abortion because I think it'll catapult that topic back into the spotlight like nothing has since Tami from Real World Season 2.

The got it right with Tim and Dawn.

Posted by: pissant at October 8, 2009 5:12 PM

I don't think they're the best couple ever but I do like that the writers haven't resorted to bullshit sitcom conventions to keep them apart or unhappy. cough-FRIENDS-cough.

Posted by: TylerDFC at October 8, 2009 5:19 PM

Confession time: I've never seen an episode of The Office.

Therefore I don't know who Jim and Pam are and couldn't care that they are getting married.

Let America tune in. I'll be two-three channels over laughing it up with the Winchester brothers.

Posted by: Fredo at October 8, 2009 5:25 PM

“Settling” for jobs at a crappy paper company in a strip-mall city in the middle of Pennsylvania isn’t really “settling” if it means being together, being in love, and possibly living that happily ever after.

YES. I completely agree, and not just because this pretty much sums up my life at the moment. Let the haters bitch & moan - excellent "toast," Rowles.

Posted by: MelBivDevoe at October 8, 2009 5:49 PM

No, I really found Mr M. funny and I've always been a DarthCorleone fan. Don't be silly!

Posted by: becks at October 8, 2009 6:00 PM

For your time wasting pleasure, and in celebration of this momentous occasion, i link you this:

http://www.halpertbeesly.com/

Posted by: Justin at October 8, 2009 6:06 PM

What a beautiful article. It sums up how I feel about them perfectly. Thank you for that Dustin. Thank you

Posted by: Candy at October 8, 2009 6:07 PM

Lucy & Desi? The Huxtables? Jed & Abbie Bartlet? Like, 20 other couples? I'm sick of this nonsense.

F**k Jim and Pam.

Posted by: Martin at October 8, 2009 6:35 PM

I've never watched the Office but this has me thinking it might be a good one to catch up on. Please tell me the writers have steered clear of BSG or Joss Whedon - it'd be a right shame to have such a couple subjected anytime soon to tragedy or loss or hardship.

Posted by: lordhelmet at October 8, 2009 7:16 PM

And that’s what we do, folks. We sacrifice. We sacrifice comfort. We sacrifice our cushy living arrangements. We sacrifice our dreams for better dreams. Because when a couple loves each other, when they really fucking love each other, long distances can be gapped, jobs can be changed, ambitions can be rechanneled, and we can settle for imperfect houses.
*sniffle*
If only you knew the perfection, the searing accuracy of the above statement that describes my love, my life at the moment and what it means to really really love someone.
*snorfle*

Posted by: brite at October 8, 2009 7:42 PM

When The Husband and I were dating, it was about 90 minute round trip for us to see each other. Sometimes I would go with him on his deliveries when he was working nights and I could still function on few hours of sleep. After he graduated from college, I moved, jobless, with him to a town that I now refer to as the hemorrhoidal butthole of Ohio. We lived in a less than perfect, and probably hazardous to our health, old house that had been converted to apartments. I found a job and was fired from that job for being pregnant. We lived in three different apartments, each one barely better than the previous one, during our time in Hemorrhoid Hills, Ohio. We finally moved closer to our families only to sleep in one small bedroom, the two of us and our 2 year old daughter. We house hunted for several months and finally found the imperfect house that we now call home. My husband lost his job and got a shitty one that pays piss and keeps him away from us nights. I finished a degree that is now useless until the economy picks up. And somewhere in all that crazy, we flew to Vegas almost 5 years ago and got hitched with our ten month old daughter watching. We couldn't be more in love.
Lovely tribute, Dustin, not only to the fictional Jim and Pam but to all of us that have personally lived what you so eloquently expressed.

Posted by: Pinky McLadybits at October 8, 2009 8:12 PM

Lets not kid ourselves. We all think, if we're married, and I am, that our love is going to make it. Statistics show otherwise. Why do we tear at this show? We do so with the hope that is closest to our life. And in this arena, Jim and Pam are it. But in reality, it is equal parts Huxtable, Roseanne, and The Office. Godspeed, marriage.

Posted by: patchfire at October 8, 2009 8:17 PM

Hemorrhoid Hills, OH? I think I have relatives there! Except they call it by its old name: Cincinatti.

And I just wanted to say that Mr. McLadybits is a lucky man. :)

Posted by: Jelinas at October 8, 2009 8:41 PM

That was a beautiful toast, Dustin. I am already tearing up.

Posted by: bonnie at October 8, 2009 8:42 PM

I couldn't agree more, I think Jim and Pam are great together, but I don't think there the first couple on tv to stay together through thick and thin. In recent years I believe Bill Laurence on Scrubs kept Turk and Carla together for that exact same reason. Love their relationship, I'm just saying there not the only tv couples to do, although it is few and far between.

Posted by: Jingram at October 8, 2009 8:51 PM

“The Office” is the first sitcom, perhaps, to prove that you don’t have to keep a couple apart to keep your viewers interested.

Or, I would suggest, tear a couple apart.

See: Mad About You.

True, Paul and Jamie were newlyweds when the series started, so you didn't have all of the drama of them getting together, but the drama was in their every day lives - how they dealt with inlaws, parents, siblings, friends, landlords, and just the craziness of living in NYC.

Then the writers got to the end of season 4, and found a large fish over which to leap.

Shark, thy name was infidelity.

It was all downhill from there. The writers tried to gain their audience back with a baby in the house, and various guest stars (Mel Brooks, Carol Burnett, Carroll O'Connor, Kevin Bacon, Janeane Garafalo), but it was never the same.

My husband felt particularly outraged at how the writers ruined that show. I guess that's why I love him so.

I guess that's why I'm off to watch The Office with him.

Yay!

Posted by: mswas at October 8, 2009 9:10 PM

I agree with whoever said Dan and Roseanne Conner are the most realistic TV couple ever. They really are.

I'm an Office devotee so I'm pretty excited about tonight.

But what you said about love and the small things? So so so so so true. Beautifully put.

Posted by: Snuggiepants the Deathbringer at October 8, 2009 9:13 PM

Okay, okay... a bit of bevvy and here we go... nae cynicism, Glesga style:

It was Christmas Eve, babe
In the drunk tank
An old man said to me, won't see another wan
And then he sang a song
The rare ol' Mountain Dew
Ah turned ma face away
And dreamed aboot you

Got oan a lucky wan
Came in eighteen tae wan
A've got a feeling
This year's for me and you
So happy Christmas
Ah love ye baby
Ah can see a better time
When all oor dreams come true

Ya wee Irish whore, I love ye. Don't tell a single cunt. Mon' the telly version of what we never were.

Posted by: TSF at October 8, 2009 9:36 PM

I have to say, the idea that Jim & Pam's relationship is not realistic astounds me. I'm often watched TV couples argue over silly misunderstandings, or break up and make up, and wonder, "Who DOES that?"

Most of my relationships have been like Jim & Pam's. Stolen glances. Prank partners. A humor only to two of you get. All that bickering and drama... who can live, let alone love, like that? It's the simple sweetness and mutual kindness that makes a relationship great. When two people that are mature and secure come together, it's a beautiful, and very real, thing.

Posted by: ceejeemcbeegee at October 8, 2009 9:37 PM

I love this Dustin. I have wasted a lot of time trying to determine if Jim and Pam or Coach and Tami Taylor are the best portrayal of realistic and healthy relationship.

Posted by: Austin asking for trouble at October 8, 2009 9:42 PM

@patchfire: No one has ever entered a romantic relationship thinking "Man, I can't wait for 2 years down the road when we're fighting and she's saying I've got a tiny dick and I'm calling her a total bitch and it spills over onto other aspects of our lives and makes us miserable."

However, the plain fact is there is only one outcome for relationships: they end. Even those lifelong affairs have a moment when they dissolve. Hence the matrimonial vows being only "till death do us part."

But as Straczynski once put it, "Only a species with such a short life span could believe that something like love can last forever. It is your great illusion and you should lose yourself to it."

Posted by: Fredo at October 8, 2009 10:14 PM

I love this! I probably would not have come up with Jim and Pam if someone had asked me about television's best couple. However, now that I've read this, I completely agree.

They're just happy. They love each other. They have stupid little stuff to make each other happy. I love that a television series is actually putting this forward as something to hope for. Because as mundane as stupid as it sounds, I think settling for someone who loves and respects me sounds pretty nice. Even if it means I'm stuck in Michigan. Even if it means that I can't run off and join the Peace Corp. There is something profoundly beautiful about a content relationship. I'd rather have this than some crazycakes relationship full of unnecessary drama.

Posted by: ashleigh at October 8, 2009 10:15 PM

I have such a crush on TSF right now..

Posted by: Anna von Beaverpuppet at October 8, 2009 10:37 PM

Nice writeup Dustin.

Posted by: Weck at October 8, 2009 11:07 PM

Jeebus creepus, but Jim and Pam sound exactly like me and Mrs. , and I guaran-damn-tee nobody wants to watch our mundane lives unfold for even an hour a week. However, it's really really cool knowing that when stuff sucks you always have each other, flaws and all.

Um ... that's just a figure of speech. I am flawless, of course.

Posted by: , (the commenter formerly known as bucdaddy) at October 8, 2009 11:53 PM

Why must anyone who disagrees be a "hater"? So technically a Bay fan can call someone who thinks "Transformers II" sucked a big one a "hater"? Get real, folks.

Jim and Pam took over a once classic show because Americans are too stupid to appreciate great dark comedy. Now, women (especially lonely office worker women who all secretly like to think they're Pam when in reality they'll probably end up like Phyllis, if they haven't already) flock to "The Office".

I really liked this show when it wasn't the second coming of "Friends". So weird to think that it's now the weakest link on NBC Thursdays.

Posted by: Midnight Monkey Madness at October 9, 2009 1:16 AM

fantastic writeup, and amazing episode. if you disagree, please consume raw beets and horse feces.

Posted by: lynch at October 9, 2009 6:28 AM

This is a great news!! so, for celebration, I want to recommend you lonely guys who hate lonely nights a great online club to meet your activity partner, romance and lover, either for heat or passion: __Tallconnect C om___ the most popular place for hot modelss, handsome men meet and mingle! u might be surprise what u end up with!!LOL :-)

Posted by: gorden at October 9, 2009 8:03 AM

please consume raw beets and horse feces

Posted by: lynch at October 9, 2009 6:28 AM

I had no idea I'd been pronouncing "borscht" wrong all these years...

Posted by: Che Grovera at October 9, 2009 8:07 AM

I love the show and wasn't nutty about this episode. I can't put my finger on why, but it's more testament to how great the week-to-week episodes are than anything else. I think I was annoyed by Pam wondering why, if it's their wedding, there are so many people there. I think the answer, Pam, is that you elected not to elope and to have a large wedding! You can't take cash gifts from everybody and then bitch that they're there.

Jim and Pam are a great couple, but they haven't faced any real challenges yet, i.e. children, a sick relative to care for, financial problems, etc., so I can't in good conscience put them ahead of the Taylors, Huxtables, Connors, etc. Enjoy those four months of wedded bliss, kiddies!

As to sacrificing for somebody you love, it was romantic and lovely to see Pam return to Scranton "the wrong way." It was the right thing for Pam to do. Of course, if my own child did something similar and squandered his or her potential to get married at a young-ish age (I presume Jim and Pam are 27 or 28?), I'd be devastated. Hey, I never said I was consistent, fair, or not kind of a snob!

As to the Phyllis-bashing above, bite your tongue! Phyllis managed to find a dude in her 50s who frigging worships her and is relatively prosperous - in Scranton!

Posted by: samantha t at October 9, 2009 8:08 AM

Excellent episode. The best in a long time. Really funny, lots of great character stuff, and the wedding was fun. With all the dancing down the aisle with the entire cast it played more like a series finale. Would have been a great note for the show to go out on.

I love the hour long Office episodes. Seems the longer format allows them to build up the story lines rather than rush through and short some characters.

Also, Parks & Rec was funnier than Community tonight. Gonna be pissed if either of those get cancelled.

Posted by: TylerDFC at October 9, 2009 8:29 AM

I would like to nominate The Monarch and Doctor Mrs. The Monarch. Their relationship is (nearly) as realistic and their wedding was equally cathartic. Plus, David Bowie!

Posted by: elizabeth at October 9, 2009 9:49 AM

Oh heck yeah about Phyllis. She freaking rocks. And yeah, Bob Vance worships the ground she walks on as he should, LOL.

Although the episode in which they ditched out on Jim and Pam to have lunch sex in the restaurant bathroom was kinda gross.

I watched it last night and yeah, my heart melted. I won't say anything else because of the DVR people around here.

Posted by: Snuggiepants the Deathbringer at October 9, 2009 10:26 AM

I hope this thread doesn't die out. I'd love to hear from more people who think Jim and Pam are now the worst parts of "The Office".

Believe me, I've never seen a full episode of the British version, and I think season two is flawless, but come on... the mugging, the smugness, smarminess, the twee-ness?

Even Toucher and Rich of the late WBCN did a segment on how annoying they thought that couple was. There has to be others. Google...

Posted by: Midnight Monkey Madness at October 9, 2009 11:40 AM

It's "Get off my lawn" time!

3. George Burns and Gracie Allen

2. Rob and Laura Petrie

1. Ralph and Alice Kramden

Posted by: , (TCFKAB) at October 9, 2009 12:00 PM

I can barely countenance public displays of acknowledgement, let alone the kissy-kissy, goo-goo antics of the prom king and queen. I checked out when this turned into The Wedding Baby Jamboree. Yeah, yeah, St. Dead Author, and so forth. Still, these hoary old tropes are never compelling to me and are just something you have to suffer or avoid until things get interesting again.

No. Television is not homework.

I guess if I had anything resembling a heart (I've got the most ripping almost millipede-free plexiglass box monogramed by Effluvial Row--truly top drawer), I'd be lost in the throngs of breathless ecstasy, humming and buzzing in the inexpertly-strewn laurels of The Love Which Smugly Barks its Name.

And if I had anything resembling sound mind, I'd loudly wonder about that thing that happened in real life and not on a show. Yup, I said it, I said it in Toronto! Fiction? Fiction-oriented website? Fie! You know, real life? Yeah! Real life, with the: Hey, business like YOU and ME! Shiver me fuck-buttons if I can't get excited about boredom.

And if I had anything resembling the sanguine apple-spiced sagging orchards of human kindness, I wouldn't muse aloud about how funny it would be if in a year's time, papa would refuse to upchuck his half of the abortion money.

Here's what I want to see.

'Papa? What happened to the innoculation money?'

'Fuck you, Burden! Daddy's drinking and your constant harping for vitamins has made me not love you anymore.'

'Papa, what happened to Little Rickett's Louisa?'

'She died because she couldn't stand being around YOU!'

'Papa?'

'Go take your Gummi Lyme's and hie thee hence!'

'The doctor says that Marmee has 'mesothelioma'. What does that mean?'

'Meso-feel-my-cleats-up-your-arse! That's a love song!'

'Papa, whatever happened to Lisa Lougheed?'

'Coronary thrombosis*. It's caused by bad children who cry. Bad children named YOU!'

'Papa?'

'And so help me, if I'm not on the first name on the list of acknowledgements when your tell-all comes out, I will put a P.R. War on your head that will be inconceiveable!'

'I promised that spot to Pazuzu.'

'Fine. Let's just watch THE REMAINS OF THE DAY again.'

'I tolerate you too, papa.'

'I love gravel, not you!.'

'All is well.'


Now, that's compelling. AND believeable!

* Not true, God forbid. I hope she's well and happy, no disrespect.

'And that’s what we do, folks. We sacrifice. We sacrifice comfort. We sacrifice our cushy living arrangements. We sacrifice our dreams for better dreams. Because when a couple loves each other, when they really fucking love each other, long distances can be gapped, jobs can be changed, ambitions can be rechanneled, and we can settle for imperfect houses.'

What happens after I've slit my throat?

Posted by: Jo 'Mama' Besser at October 9, 2009 12:02 PM

I thought last night's episode was a mixed bag. The puking scene was ridiculous. The three wolf shirt Dwight was wearing was a rip off. They ended the episode with the dance thing from the internet as well. Maybe they wrote a half hour episode and then filled in the other half hour with clips from youtube.

Posted by: becks at October 9, 2009 12:12 PM

Two words: Marge. Homer.

Posted by: John Williams at October 9, 2009 12:32 PM

I was so caught up in the Jim/Pam madness (did you know NBC.com sells "JaM" shirts?!?) that I googled fan fiction this week. My fondness of their relationship has dragged me that low.

I don't want to be Pam, I don't have a crush on Jim, but I just love their togetherness. It just works.

Posted by: lawnjart at October 9, 2009 3:19 PM

I think whether or not you get the Pam/Jim is if you have it / see it / know it in real life. If my husband and I didn't have that sort of relationship, I'd probably think it was bullshit too. But that's us, that's what Dustin talked about, we live that and the inside jokes and the "twee-ness" every day. Since we got together nothing has ever torn it or broken it or anything- from fertility treatments to losing jobs and yes, 8 months of living in his parent's basement when our house was still being built. We might not be as pretty, but we gots that, and it's just as good as it looks on screen.

Posted by: lilianna28 at October 9, 2009 3:50 PM

Funny story: I got married on a tour boat by the captain too!
The Divorce has been final for 4 years.
The end.

Posted by: Lindsey with an 'e' at October 9, 2009 4:04 PM

I knew it was a bad idea to come this site after watching the episode; I knew a site of scathing reviews for bitchy people would attract bitchy people who are going to complain that there are better Tv couples/ The Office isn't as good as when Jim and Pam weren't together/ the wedding episode wasn't that funny/ their relationship is unrealistic/ love hurts and other stuff like that.
I couldn't care less (ok, I care enough to make a list of the common opinions, but nothing more); this was a great episode (I admit the puking scene was disgusting and an awful opening scene) and despite having its ups and downs, The Office is still one of the best shows on TV and Jim and Pam's relationship (along with Michael's dramatic moments) are the heart of the series, the thing that makes it different than other great comedies lik 30 Rock. I'm glad I finally saw the wedding episode, though now I will be mildly annoyed by the comments I read here (ok...I admit I care enough to get annoyed by them).

Posted by: Radlum at October 9, 2009 7:06 PM

You're annoyed that other people have different opinions than you?

Posted by: becks at October 9, 2009 7:17 PM

Only if the seem mean spirited; I mean, someone said that George and Susan from Seinfeld make a better TV couple, I know he's joking and found that comment somewhat funny; or maybe Mulder and Scully are a better couple, haven't seen The X-Files so I wouldn't know. But some comments just get on my nerves because they seem to be made only to bring the whole point of the wedding episode down regardless of the value of the episode; I never intended to say that I am angered at seeing different opinions, just that the comments are more akin to what I would expect to see in GameFAQS rather than in Pajiba

Posted by: Radlum at October 9, 2009 7:37 PM

I did get a bit misty-eyed during the final wedding scene (with the cuts between the "wedding" and the boat). But...am I the only person who thinks The Office has not been the same lately? I mean, even just last week: Jim making the choice to give raises only to the salespeople? Pam falling for Ryan's gambling scheme? Those are not how those characters act. The Jim and Pam that the writers have worked all these seasons to create would not have done those things.

They've changed Michael even more, though. In the first seasons, he was idiot and a bad manager and just generally pathetic, but he also made you feel a little bit bad for him because he genuinely just wanted people to like him. And he had moments where he displayed real humility and kindness. But now...I can't even watch some of his scenes. He's just really brutally narcisitic and ridiculous and mean.

I know that Kelly and Ryan have been pretty drastically changed since the beginning of the show, but neither of them were central characters initially. Their development was not something that the audience was given a reason for because it wasn't needed. But with Jim, Pam, and Michael, it's different. The whole show is based around them and their interactions with each other and the other office workers. If they're suddenly going to start acting in ways that are completely irrational based on the characterizations that have been established, there should be a definite cause behind it. Maybe I missed the moments in the show where these characters started to change. I don't get it.

Oh. Apparently I had some venting to do.

Posted by: Bethany at October 9, 2009 8:27 PM

(And some bad spelling/bad grammer/missed words to get off my chest, too. It's definitely time to starting drinking.)

Posted by: Bethany at October 9, 2009 8:30 PM

The wedding episode was weird in that the hopeless romantics didn't get their rocks off, and the die-hard comedy aficionados didn't get satisfaction either. You can't please everyone...it really tried to walk the aisle here, if you will.

I appreciate Pam being pregnant and tearing her veil, tired from spending the night with Andy's scrotum. This was far from a dreamy fantasy wedding. Their whole relationship has been stolen moments, and the vows themselves were no exception. It just makes sense.

Posted by: lawnjart at October 9, 2009 9:51 PM

Are you looking for millionaire singles or wealthy great looking soulmate?
I'm glad to recommend you a place ________ WealthySeeker.COM ________ to search them out! We have more than 1200,000 members including: lawyer, CEO, manager, model, actor, doctor, hollywood celebrities, althlets, investors.

Posted by: Lucy at October 9, 2009 10:00 PM

Greatest TV Couple?

Christina Hendricks' Boobs

Hands Down.....

Boners Up.....

Posted by: Rubble44 at October 10, 2009 1:20 AM

DeistBrawler - "Cute and perfect...that's like watching a movie with a couple that's been married for thirty years that has wild and crazy break the bed sex."

Just wait til me and Mr. Kitty release the sextape.
MEee-owwrr!

Posted by: April_Kitty at October 10, 2009 3:00 AM

The Jim & Pam relationship is sweet, but also dull, dull, dull. TV comedies don't exist to project the idea of a perfect relationship, but to entertain, and unfortunately, Jim & Pam haven't done that in quite some time.

(Also, Pam's decision to abandon her career/art for Jim was a mistake and she will come to regret it.)

Posted by: Fiona at October 10, 2009 7:27 PM

I actually love the interactions between Jim and Pam. I find it harder and harder to watch the scenes with Michael in them and have even fast forwarded through some of them. I get it, he always has to be the center of attention but I've seen 6 year old kids act more mature than he has over the last season and a half. I just don't like awkward comedy that much.

You would think Steve Carell would have said something by now. It's a million variations on the same redundant theme. But to watch Jim and Pam and also see Dwight freak out from time to time is enough to keep me coming back.

Posted by: Rubble44 at October 10, 2009 9:32 PM

They've changed Michael even more, though. In the first seasons, he was idiot and a bad manager and just generally pathetic, but he also made you feel a little bit bad for him because he genuinely just wanted people to like him. And he had moments where he displayed real humility and kindness. But now...I can't even watch some of his scenes. He's just really brutally narcisitic and ridiculous and mean.

Call it the curse of the hit show. The longer they go the more of a caricature the main players become.

Friends
Seinfeld
Cheers
Taxi
Etc, etc.

Posted by: ed newman at October 12, 2009 12:08 PM

Just reading this (very late) but had to let you know, DR, that you got me all teary eyed. A perfect summary of what I love about Jim and Pam.

I loved this episode and the shot of them on the boat, all mist-soaked with their arms around one another looking at the falls, Pam's head on his shoulder was just lovely.

Cheers to Jim and Pam. . .

Posted by: prairiegirl at October 12, 2009 5:32 PM

Uggggghhhhh is this a joke? Is this Pajiba? You honestly think this cardboard cut out american sitcom caricature of a couple is realistic? Compared to Tim and Dawn, for just one example- sweet and SUBTLE.

In honour of the dull affair, TWOP made a list of all the ways jim and pam are fucking awful. It was much more enjoyable reading than this sickly drivel.

Posted by: Sass at October 22, 2009 8:10 AM

Who cares!!! My boyfriend also agrees with me. He is 10 years older than me, lol. We met online at age-gap club -- http://AgelessOnly.COM/. Maybe you wanna check out or tell your friends.

Posted by: Helen at October 23, 2009 11:37 AM





Post a comment

 (required)

 (required)


Preview of your comment: