shutupandsing1.jpg
The Best Documentaries of 2006

Pajiba’s Year in Review / Daniel Carlson

Guides | January 7, 2007 | Comments (29)


Pinpointing the golden age of Hollywood is fodder for endless debates: Some say it was 1939, some the film-school heyday of the 1970s, and so on. But I don’t think it’s going too far to say that we’re currently living in the golden age of documentaries. The first few years of the 21st century have seen a passionate rebirth of the form, turning them from dour character studies into fiery, entertaining films with mass appeal. From Spellbound to Murderball, documentaries are examining cross-sections of American life like never before, and from the smug Fahrenheit 9/11 to the moving Why We Fight, documentaries offer the kind of pointed political debate that’s often lacking from other media. Following in the footsteps of spiritual ancestors like Hands on a Hard Body and Hearts & Minds, documentary filmmakers are now as skilled as their feature counterparts at weaving a compelling narrative, and it’s all the more fascinating when watching real people. And that, more than any political belief or movement, is the recurring theme in the documentaries that rose to the top in 2006: Real people, with real lives, playing for high stakes. Sure, the stakes might not always seem high to the viewer — the subjects in Wordplay are hanging out in a hotel and doing crossword puzzles, after all, not solving world hunger — but for the subjects of these films, nothing is more important than their chosen passions, and watching them each pursue their respective callings becomes a privilege.

And so, I offer the best documentaries of the year, the ones that stood out from the already stellar pack by showing even more blood, sweat, and creative joy than their esteemed peers. I’m also refraining from giving them a definitive ranking: They are all amazing films, and I wouldn’t want to cheapen one by insinuating that it’s somehow “worse” than others on the list. Here we go:

singfinal.jpg Shut Up & Sing: Barbara Kopple and Cecilia Peck’s inside look at the Dixie Chicks and the fallout over their political jabs at President Bush in 2003 is a stirring tribute to the power of free speech, a compelling look at how to run a band, and an uplifting tale of three women who refuse to compromise their values. Shut Up & Sing shows how the Chicks’ political stand fueled their latest album, and in the process lead singer Natalie Maines has become even more hardened in her stance against her critics. There’s no question that the “polite” country society shunned the group because they’re women; men would have been branded rebels, but the Chicks received hate mail calling them unpatriotic sluts. It’s a fascinating and entertaining movie, even if you don’t like country music.

truthfinal.jpg An Inconvenient Truth: I expected to doze off during An Inconvenient Truth: After all, it’s (a) Al Gore (b) giving a slide show about (c) global warming. But Gore’s reasoned, quietly impassioned plea for ecological responsibility is eminently watchable, thanks in large part to Gore’s mixture of self-deprecating showman and well-researched professor. Covering a broad area of knowledge while also delving into Gore’s personal motivations for his speeches, the film does what the best documentaries do: It changes your mind.

ratedfinal.jpg This Film Is Not Yet Rated: Kirby Dick’s entertaining documentary proves what you probably already suspect: The MPAA is a shady, ethically dubious group. Dick sets out to learn the identities of the members of the MPAA’s ratings board, a famously anonymous and clouded group, in his attempt to learn more about what makes the group tick, and more importantly, why sexually explicit films draw harsher ratings than ones containing violence. It’s a diatribe against the puritanical hypocrisy that governs most of our public society, and also an indictment against the studio conglomerates and theater chains that cozy up to one another, leaving truly independent films — like this one — out in the cold.

wordfinal.jpg Wordplay: Proving that nerds can be worthy subjects for a documentary, Patrick Creadon’s Wordplay mines gripping drama from the most unlikely of places — a crossword puzzle competition — while also keeping things light with a series of entertaining interviews with subjects ranging from Jon Stewart to Bill Clinton. It’s a testament to Creadon that the film never gets boring, even though it’s often nothing more than watching people scribble obscure vocabulary words on giant grids. The five main contestants’ profiles are endearingly human, and the resulting showdown is one of the most suspenseful sequences since Jimmy Chitwood saved the day in Hoosiers. (Well, maybe not. But it’s up there.)

campfinal.png Jesus Camp: Heidi Ewing and Rachel Grady’s fascinating glimpse into the lives of a group of extremist Christians has only grown more potent and relevant since its release. The summer camp profiled in the film has been shuttered; Ted Haggard, president of the National Association of Evangelicals, who appeared in the film supporting its cause and the movement of Christian evangelicals in politics, has resigned in sexual disgrace. But Jesus Camp remains a powerful, eye-opening look at a specific culture in a specific time. It’s necessary viewing for people of all faiths, and generates intelligent discussion even as its young subjects are horribly manipulated by the adults around them.

Daniel Carlson is the managing editor of Pajiba and a low-level employee at a Hollywood industry magazine. You can visit his blog, Slowly Going Bald.









Haggis vs. Sorkin | Captain Pajiba Shows No Mercy!













Comments

I felt Jesus camp was the best of the 5, best documentary in years.

It's not a 2006 release, but I'd recommend anyone reading this to invest some time and money in the 7 up series. It was started 50 years ago, and the filmmaker interviews and films a series of British children from all castes every seven years, beginning at 7, and so on.

Posted by: Kevin Longrie at January 8, 2007 4:32 AM

If you want to learn about Global Warming, watch the Ted Koppel special on Discovery Channel. It covers all the same stuff without the viewer having to suffer through Al talking about his child's car accident again.
The point of An Inconvenient Truth is supposed to be education about global warming. Anything off topic looks like self-congratulation or lefty fanboy genuflection.I take my hat off to Al for his excellent presentation, but please lose the little "All about awesome Al" vignettes. They are counter-productive and grating.

Posted by: mk at January 8, 2007 11:36 AM

All five have been on my list for some time--they look great and I will get to them. It's a dream come true to see any documentary style becoming part of wide-release distribution and audience consumption. The aughts have been good to us.

Personally, though, it's not a great documentary year for me if it doesn't have a new McElwee, Broomfield or Morris--even the latest Herzog (in terms of availability in my region), Grizzly Man, was the least of what that man is capable of doing. Most US documentaries released since the Moore momentum ignited are like two-fingered Chopsticks next to the symphonic scope of impact and idea WH is able to produce.

I know--I am his bitch. His and McElwee's. God love them.

Posted by: ranylt at January 8, 2007 12:55 PM

You're forgetting:
1) the Devil and Daniel Johnston, and
2) Who killed the electric car.

Posted by: gabrielle at January 8, 2007 1:05 PM

You're forgetting:
1) the Devil and Daniel Johnston, and
2) Who killed the electric car.

Posted by: gabrielle at January 8, 2007 1:05 PM

For me,Shut Up and Sing was one of the five best films period. I laughed out loud more than during any of Hollywood's "comedies". This is a fine film that really is more about band dynamics than politics.

Posted by: apocalipstick at January 8, 2007 1:19 PM

I also really enjoyed Heart of the Game.

Posted by: apocalipstick at January 8, 2007 1:58 PM

Gorebal warming.
hahahahahahaha.

Posted by: boris at January 8, 2007 2:47 PM

I was really interested in seeing "The Shadow Company," a doc concerning the mercenary presence in Iraq representing various corporate and private interests. Haven't yet.

http://www.shadowcompanythemovie.com/

Posted by: Justin at January 8, 2007 3:50 PM

If you haven't already seen Black Gold, that is a must see as well! We were lucky enough to have both of the creators/directors on hand at our local film festival for a Q&A afterwards. Anyone who can't NOT think about where their next cup of coffee is coming from after seeing this film has a heart that's two sizes too small. :)

Posted by: Amanda at January 8, 2007 5:52 PM

On Jesus Camp, even though I've already lost all hope for the human race, it still amazes me how people are willing to surrender their will to religion. ANY religion. It all boils down to shit someone makes up, and then the followers of said someone going about ramming it down as many others' throats as possible.

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at January 9, 2007 7:59 AM

You've left off perhaps one of the most important visual documents of our era - When the Levees Broke. I'm not sure if it qualifies as a theatrical release, but it's certainly a monumental testament to film making.

Posted by: Zach at January 9, 2007 9:40 AM

The Dixie Chicks?! Come on! These 3 skanks are has-beens, so don't go chalking up their crap-effort as a fight for free speech and not giving up their precious values. This treasonous trio is poison to America and the only thing they compromised was their country. I'm glad they receive hate mail and death threats.

And besides, they've broken up to "take a break." Sure. They're toast and over with, so don't go praising their efforts. Their DVD sales on this fiasco are going to be pitiful.

Posted by: Steve at January 9, 2007 2:35 PM

I wondered how long it would take before some redneck cro-magnon posted some misinformed tripe about the Dixie Chicks. Not too long, I see.

Hey Steve, could you be more full of shit?

Has beens? Five Grammy nominations? One of the best selling albums of 2006?

How many Grammy nominations did Toby Keith get? How many albums did Toby Keith sell? (Hint: less than the Dixie Chicks for both questions).

Treasonous? Check out the US Constution, the First Amendment:

"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances."

Before you spew "foreign soil", reread the Constutition. It applies to US Citizens, without respect to where on the planet they may be.

If you can figure all this out, get back to us.

Posted by: Jake at January 9, 2007 3:53 PM

Funny how the most patriotic are ALWAYS the one's who want to trample on those who actually try to assert their rights. Of course, to these people "the Constitution" is only the Second Amendment, the rest is just dicta.

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at January 9, 2007 5:42 PM

It's weird how I'm totally agreeing with BarbadoSlim.

Posted by: juliagulia at January 9, 2007 7:34 PM

As for Barabado Slim's Constitutional analysis, I wonder which law Congress passed in the last session which impinged on Ms. Maines' freedom of speech.

Posted by: Henry_Fool at January 10, 2007 12:40 AM

Yeah for Steve the Troll! The ignorant finally raise their misinformed and brain-washed heads. Let the floodgates open and welcome the patriotic to the party.

Posted by: ScarletKnight at January 10, 2007 1:02 AM

Steve may be wrong(the death threats), but look at yourselves! There's some of that famed lefty tolerance!

"cro-magnon...brainwashed...ignorant..."
what other brilliant missives have "the resistance" cooked up on the DU, ready for a particularly gleeful cut and paste? Funny when someone criticizes the dixie chick's particular flavor of idiocy for what it is, the loud squaking of "censorship" starts up.

Almost all country music sucks, whether it's the typical self-pity or knee-jerk anti-american pap.

Gore is at least gullible, and possibly a little crazy, and you're either mis-informed or in denial if you believe him.

Not everyone who disagrees with you goes to jesus-camp. As well, a many of us choose to exercize the second amendment in order to protect the first. For everyone, Barbado Slim-freedom of speech makes it easy to pick out teh stup1d5.

As for Michael Moore... well, good for you all, the democrat party has found it's Joseph Goebbels. Now go pretend humans are even a significant cause of, or can do anything about, global warming, or that guns cause murder, or that everyone that disagrees with your liberal dogma is a brainwashed jesus freak, or doesn't care.

Pajiba still rocks, though.

Posted by: russo at January 11, 2007 2:30 AM

Almost all country music sucks, whether it's the typical self-pity or knee-jerk anti-american pap.
I'm assuming you made a typo, since calling country music "anti-american pap" would lead one to think you're full of crap. Country music has been and is about as conservative (as in slow to change) and right-wing as you get.

Posted by: apocalipstick at January 11, 2007 11:32 AM

Hence the first part of the sentence, including the words (either, or). Read it all together, it makes sense. The DC's music IS "anti-American pap", and last time I checked, it IS country music.

Pap- something, especially a book, movie, television program, or idea that is so lacking in depth and substance that it is considered worthless.

Proclivity to wallowing in self-pity and guilt is a characteristic found in liberals, too. I am not sure how you could think it's a characteristic unique to the right wing. Perhaps it has something to do with an elitist world-view. Wait- everyone who disagrees with you is just a brainwashed fascist, or is just too stupid to understand they need you socially evolved "progressives" as their shepherds! Those poor, pathetic, Christ-loving Cro-Magnons. Where would they be without your infinite patience and good will?

Posted by: russo at January 11, 2007 1:58 PM

@ russo, if you wanna call me stupid just do it, I don't really give a rat's ass. However I've got an inkling of what a conservative paradise is going to look like (we all have) and it does not look at all like what the founding fathers wanted. So just go ahead and live it up, when we get our comeuppance I 'll be dead and buried and I don't have children. So once again, YOUR children will get to enjoy the gigantic pile of shit you are creating.

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at January 11, 2007 2:05 PM

Whoa, russo, you are one angry mofo. Where did I say wallowing in self-pity and guilt was unique to the right wing? Where did I even talk about wallowing in self-pity and guilt? It is a fact that country music has been more conservative (in the classic sense) than other forms, and I would also hold that most country music artists and fans are more likely to be pro-administration. You said "almost all" country music sucks. That's a broad, broad brush. Any genre that contains Merle Haggard, Willie Nelson, Johnny Cash, and Dwight Yoakam (and that's just a pitifully small sampling) is much more diverse than your spewed rage. I think your attempt to divine my political stance from my post speaks more to your own bile than anything I wrote.

Posted by: apocalipstick at January 11, 2007 7:01 PM

Picture this, apocalipstick: I am not actually sitting here in a pool of my own sweat, screaming your name out loud as I angrily curse and hammer keys down one by one on the keyboard, trying to get my bile...just...right. For the most part, I wasn't responding to you. For what was dished out before I jumped in, I am not even hitting par. The only innocent victims of my little rant up there are country music stars, with apologies to williams, cash, nelson, frizzell, earl and the dukes, not so much the others. Maybe haggard, too. Angry? Painting someone with a broad brush? Look at comments 11, 13, 14, 15, etc. That's what I am talking about. Apparently it only qualifies as hateful bile if the person spewing isn't agreeing with you.

Sarcastic? Yes. Angry? No. I apologize if I hurt your feelings, I don't have you pegged for anything for more than a few words in the comment section of documentary review. Next time I'll read my post and be more specific as to who I am replying to before I hit send.

Barbado Slim- I am almost sorry to break your righteous indignation, but I wasn't calling you stupid, I was trying to be funny. I am not going to call you stupid or brainwashed simply for disagreeing with me, like scarlet knight up does up there, to kick things off.

Posted by: russo at January 11, 2007 9:08 PM

these comment threads seem to inevitably become a forum for pointless arguments about things so far removed from the subject at hand...it's ridiculous.

debate is cool, but personal attacks are pathetic, cowardly, and totally unnecessary.

Posted by: get over it at January 12, 2007 7:35 PM

Someone mentioned When the Levees Broke (frankly I'm too lazy to scroll back up and see who). I watched it, almost everyone here (Louisiana) watched it. And most of us thought "Well, that's certainly a slant that we've seen all this time." Granted, Spike Lee made some effort at diversity with the old, rich white couple but seriously? He just culled clips from the news and fed the country regurgitated bullshit. Nothing new was seen. Yes, he examined the fact that many people think the levee was bombed. It's a plausible theory--it happened in the 1920s. But the whole movie just fell short.
I'm perfectly willing to admit that I'm biased against this movie because I'm from New Orleans. But living here, seeing debris still sitting there . . . nothing is going to capture the feelings surrounding that. In the end, I'll give Spike credit for trying to accomplish the impossible.

Posted by: Sharon at January 12, 2007 7:41 PM

How does criticism of the Dixie Chicks equate to stifling their speech? I don't believe anyone is claiming they don't have a right to speak their minds. Their critics are simply pointing out the idiocy of what Maines et al have to say and offering the opinion that it is anti-American.

Sounds remarkably like free speech to me. You get to say what you want and I get to call you a moron because of it.

Posted by: Jeremy at January 16, 2007 12:01 AM

I've no interest in engaging in debate, I'm just wondering where this "lefties are tolerant" shit comes from, as if because you're on the left you can't call someone an ignorant dumbass. Lefties aren't all hippies, you know. Dumbass.

Posted by: markus at January 17, 2007 1:14 PM

Hi,
I found your blog via google by accident and have to admit that youve a really interesting blog :-)
Just saved your feed in my reader, have a nice day :)

Posted by: Florian at January 29, 2007 1:52 PM


















Viral Hits

>> Pajiba Movie Posters

>> Pop Culture's 20 Greatest Dancing GIFs

>> Mindhole Blowers

>> The 100 Greatest Insults of All Time

>> The "Other" 100 Greatest Movie Quotes

>> The 100 Greatest Movie Threats of All Time

>> The Sean Bean Death Reel

>> Chicks Dig Beards: It's Science

>> The Coolest TV Show Title Sequences

>> The Most Rewatchable Movies

>> The Most Expensive Movies of All Time