
Gobble Gobble Goo and Gobble Gobble Giggle. I Wish Pajiba Only Cost a Nickel.
The Weekly Trade Round-Up / The Pajiba Staff
Item #1: Probably my favorite book of the last year is Frank Portman’s King Dork. It’s a brilliant first-person coming-of-age narrative about an anti-Holden Caulfield struggling through high school and the mysterious death of a parent. The prose is outright exhilarating — think a loserish 10th-grade version of High Fidelity’s Rob Gordon crossed with a young, insecure Klosterman. There’s even a “Veronica Mars”-ish detective element to the storyline. And it comes with its own glossary, which defines, for instance, “ramoning” as: “A form of the verb ‘to ramone’ (derived from the French ramoner, to scrub out a chimney). The point of human existence, i.e., sexual intercourse.” For public-school outliers, it’s an infinitely relatable little novel. And it’s downright hilarious, to boot. So, you can imagine the mixed feelings I have upon learning that King Dork has been optioned by Will Ferrell’s new production company. It’s actually a book that feels like it would translate well into a feature film, but you just know they’re going to fuck it up and ruin any and all positive associations I have with the novel by casting some chisel-chested 19-year-old CW heartthrob to play a pathetic 14-year-old dork. Still, if it inspires legions of folks to pick up the book, it’s undeniably worth the risk. — Dustin Rowles
Item #2: I probably don’t need to waste my time or effort persuading you of the glories of “Freaks and Geeks”: It was a great show, it died too young, blah blah blah, etc. It’s all true, but it’s all been said before. The show’s creator, Paul Feig, is one talented guy, having directed several episodes of “Arrested Development” and the U.S. incarnation of “The Office.” And that, frankly, is what makes me so depressed at the questionable turns his career has taken of late. He’s got a feature coming out in December, Warners’ Unaccompanied Minors, that looks positively dreadful. It involves a bunch of kids stuck in an airport at Christmas, features a distractedly bemused-looking Lewis Black (and don’t get me started on that guy’s fall from grace), and in general looks like the kind of pabulum that should have aired as a Nickelodeon “Special Delivery” 15 years ago. Now, news has come down the pike that Feig’s next film will be “Smooth Operator,” also for Warner Bros. The plot involves a suave CIA agent who has to impart his skills as a ladies’ man to a “computer nerd” to help the geek seduce a female enemy operative. And if that doesn’t sound broad, slapsticky, and downright stupid enough for you, here’s what Feig said: “It’s like a high-tech version of Cyrano, or like a Hitch-meets-Rush Hour.” Thanks for taking the baby kitten that was my memories of “F&G” and crushing it under your relentless heel, Paulie. — Daniel Carlson
Item #3: Oh man. Deepak Chopra adapting a screenplay for a Nic Cage flick. Please don’t make me go on. Oh, fuck it: It’s called The Sadhu, which is the story of a soldier who travels to India during colonial times and becomes a “spiritual warrior.” You’ve got to be kidding me, right? Fortunately, the plot mixes both action and mythology, suggesting that Mr. Cage will embarrass himself in two different genres. The story of The Sadhu was actually created by Deepak’s son, Gotham(?). I don’t even know what else to say about this, except to ask if anyone else has seen the trailer for Cage’s upcoming superhero flick, Ghost Rider, about a daredevil who makes a pact with the devil? Amazingly, Cage has found new and inventive ways of humiliating himself. Honestly — the actual Ghost Rider looks like something off an old Iron Maiden T-shirt. Get excited. — DR
Item #4: Hey, you know the Weinstein brothers? Well those fat fucks can burn. Thanks to a new deal with Blockbuster, the big blue chain has the exclusive right to rent Weinstein flicks for the next four years. Which means that folks like me (and, I suspect, many of you), who pretty much rent exclusively from Netflix, are S.O.L. This deal certainly isn’t going to have me running to Blockbuster to get my copy of School for Scoundrels. And it’s really not going to get me to rent anything decent that they happen to put out, either. These idiots have just lost a portion of their customer base, and all to partner up with a slowly decaying company? No wonder Disney didn’t want to work with these former wunderkinds anymore. — Seth Freilich
Item #5: As a follow-up to the abysmal My Super Ex-Girlfriend, Uma Thurman will star in the Lifetime-sounding romantic comedy The Accidental Husband, which this week recruited Colin Firth, Jeffrey Dean Morgan (“Grey’s Anatomy”), and Sam Shepard for its nefarious and undoubtedly crappy purposes. In what could only be an ill-advised spiritual nod to The Truth About Cats & Dogs, Thurman will play the host of a relationship-oriented talk-radio program. Firth will play her husband with all the restrained wet-shirt glory he brings to the period roles he usually plays. Thurman counsels one of her callers to dump her boyfriend, played by Morgan, who then sets about wreaking all kinds of Rube Goldbergian revenge on Uma. No word yet on whether Morgan will suffer a horrible death to the strains of Snow Patrol, but that would probably boost the audience. — DC
Item #6: Sacha Baron Cohen’s Borat held onto the top slot over the weekend, grossing an extra $29 million. And we still have folks in the Borat comment thread debating about whether it’s funny-offensive or just offensive. Personally, I don’t know why anyone would get so worked up about a film starring a figure skater. The second and third positions stayed the same: The Santa Clause 3 and Flushed Away. Stranger than Fiction debuted at number four with around $14 million, which is a bit of a disappointment for a movie with 10 times the merit of any other Will Ferrell film. A Good Year absolutely tanked, coming in at number ten, proving that no one cares to see the softer side of Russell Crowe. And, finally, Harsh Times racked up a measly $2 million, good for 13th place, though you couldn’t tell it from the ongoing (and incredibly entertaining) flame wars in that film’s comment thread.
A note, also, about Pajiba’s comments. I figure, based on the number of comments compared to the number of visitors we get here at Pajiba, that around one to two percent of our readers actually visit them, while only about .005 actually comment. I’ll be honest — I rarely even notice comments on other blogs myself. But, for those who don’t read past the author bio, I totally have to recommend digging into the comments section here occasionally. Seriously, a lot of our commenters are absolutely brilliant; even the petty backbiting is inspired. Truly, if you’re not checking them out, you’re missing half the Pajiba experience.
And I have absolutely no idea what sort of demographic makeup we attract; on most days, I’m surprised we even have an audience. But according to one of our more vociferous commenters, “I am Never Wrong”:
The people that come here are somewhat smug and self-congratulatory. They seem to be primarily female, probably between the ages of 25-35, I can see them with their Kerry/Edwards bumper stickers, Faint mp3s, horn-rimmed glasses and office jobs. They also type excruciatingly twee things like “I heart this site” or *hides self-esteem under the bed*.
I wonder, in fact, if this is even close to true — are we courting the Lisa Loeb demographic? If so, that kind of rocks. [If Lisa Loeb is reading this, please call me. I’m single and can cook. Thanks. — DC]
Anyway, this weekend finally brings us the much anticipated Casino Royale, the latest Bond installment. I have to be honest, though. I caught the film on BBC over the weekend. I didn’t think much of it. It didn’t make a whole helluva lot of sense. The production values are shit — it looks like a Technicolor film. There are several Bonds in this movie, too, and one guy is a dead ringer for Woody Allen and another for Peter Sellers. I’m not a Bond aficionado or anything, but I had no idea it was built around silly gags and lame puns (a British soldier, for instance, knocks himself out saluting a superior?). Maybe it’s a generational thing. At any rate, Dan will have his take on the film tomorrow. Happy Feet also opens, giving us all an opportunity to hear freakin’ Robin Williams freestyle about whale blubber or penguin mating habits or make yet another joke about Al Gore inventing the Internet. Let’s Go to Prison opens in 1,400 theaters, promising to break the heart of every Will Arnett fan in existence. In limited release, we’ll also have reviews of Fast Food Nation and Christopher Guest’s latest, For Your Consideration, a film that uses a remarkably similar font to the works of Wes Anderson.
Finally: No round-up next week, what with the whole Thanksgiving thing. We’ll be covering all the wide releases, however: Tenacious D, Déjà Vu, The Fountain, Deck the Halls, Bobby, and maybe even Volver. So, for all you Lisa Loebs out there who can’t make it back to your folks’ houses for the holiday, you’ll have ample opportunities to leave your *twee* comments. Happy Thanksgiving, y’all.
Pajiba Love 11/15/06 | | What I'm Watching on Thursdays
Comments
Oh Brothers Weinstein, really? Really?
Posted by: Kevin Longrie at November 16, 2006 5:07 AM
Well, I, for one, am not a Lisa Loeb female. Hell, I'm not even female!
However, I do love the comments. They do tend to get animated. Quite the entertainment factor there.
All that plus killer reviews!
And I saw that same Casino Royal you saw, except I saw it when it first came out. And, like you, I didn't get it. I avoided it on BBC last weekend because I have such traumatic memories of it.
This new one is supposed to hew a little closer to the book (with some "modernization" such as the game being Texas Hold 'em instead of Baccarat.)
We shall see.
Posted by: Uncle JR at November 16, 2006 6:49 AM
So Wes Anderson has a monopoly on the use of Futura Bold? It's an effing font. Whatever.
Posted by: groanygirl at November 16, 2006 6:51 AM
I love demographic surveys (not that you've asked for one, of course)! I am a 34-year-old lawyer at a big, somewhat scary NYC law firm and decidedly NOT Lisa Loeb-ish (don't even get me started on how much that woman grates on my nerves). Married. A lifelong Democrat who, if I had a car, would, indeed, have a faded, sad Kerry/Edwards sticker still on to keep the dream alive.
I agree that many of the posters are extremely insightful and funny. Reminiscent of the fora on Fametracker, which are defunct now (sniff, sniff).
Posted by: Samantha T at November 16, 2006 7:34 AM
you're kidding, right? you saw the ORIGINAL casino royale.
Posted by: mac at November 16, 2006 7:36 AM
Thanks for the little suck-up to us commenters.
In my view there are two distinct sub-species of commenters on Pajiba: unspeakably clever and articulate people who type some of the funniest shit I've ever seen; and emotimorons who unselfconsciously volunteer the information that Adam Sandler (or Dane Cook, or Will Ferrell, or whoever) is a comic genius...and the latter group are also hysterically funny to read, in a totally different sort of way, if you know what I mean. ;-)
I always read the comments. I can't help myself.
Posted by: Jerce at November 16, 2006 7:54 AM
Well I'm excited for the new Casino Royale, which even if it flops simply has to be a better production than the original.
Also, futura bold is actually a stolen adaptation first pioneered in art by Barbara Kruger, and she used it primarily because it's a font that draws the eye and annouces itself. (Yes, there is a little psychology behind typeface use).
Posted by: divinefuror at November 16, 2006 8:45 AM
Well..
Indeed a badly shaved male, much older, leftwing person
from the Netherlands, so did I miss something not
knowing who's Lisa?
Nice name, though, sexy!
Never listen to mp3, have steelrimmed glasses, but yeah,
have an office job. My first, and i'm 35.
We sell Apples faster than we can order them.
This site is one of my favorites in the moviegossip corner.
Ceep up the works!
But if there are that many women reading here,
how about a dating corner?
Posted by: Magiel at November 16, 2006 9:14 AM
Frankly, who gives a shit what demographic you draw? The site is great. The writing is intelligent and interesting, even if I don't always agree with it. And the comments alternate between brilliant and uproarious. As for the dumbass trolls who constantly post in order to berate the posters here (Smell that? That's irony!), whatever. I'm glad that they've at least grown out of the moronic AICN talkbacks (which I have as well). I just think they waste a lot of time. It's the equivalent of going to redstates.org and posting liberal comments. It's shooting fish in a barrel. It's silly and childish.
And mac - Good Lord yes, he's kidding. Come on now!
Posted by: TK at November 16, 2006 9:25 AM
1. The original Casino Royale film, from what I understand, was deliberately turned into a Mel-Brooks-like spoof (there's one more spoofy Bond flick out there, too, but the name escapes me). Apparently the spoofing was the director's treatment of Fleming's first Bond book--not a reflection of the actual novel. The two films couldn't be any more different in their approaches, so I shouldn't let the "gags" in the earlier film dissuade people from seeing the new version.
(Bondies: feel free to correct me--this is just hearsay on my part, I'm no expert. In fact it wouldn't surprise me if there was a wheezy little voice escaping my starfish at this very moment.)
2. This new Paul Fieg thing reminds me of Rodriquez announcing "Spy Kids," back in the day. I was sure I would HATE it based on the premise (it sounded so freaking Disney), but it was surprisingly nothing like I expected. So take heart--perhaps there's an iota of hope, here.
3. The Weinsteins/Blockbuster thing...Good Christ. I'm afraid for once, on a given point, I'm speechless.
Posted by: ranylt at November 16, 2006 9:30 AM
I agree on the awesomeness of Feig's previous work, and am willing to give him the benefit of a doubt. If I find myself during matinee hours looking for something to watch until my true choice comes on, I might check out Unaccompanied Minors. Oh wait. It has Wilmer Valderrama. Never mind.
When I can understand them, the comments can be really funny. I am quite far from a Lisa Loeb female (although she is quite attractive in those glasses), and never saw the point of the issue of Pajiba demographics. If you are acting like an ass, then you are an ass. Doesn't matter who you are or what you look like.
Of course, I have only just started commenting, so I don't have enough experience yet. Hopefully, I can be of the intelligent yet funny vareity.
Posted by: Vermillion at November 16, 2006 9:56 AM
Actually that *was* Woody Allen and Peter Sellers in the old Casino Royale.
I caught that movie on TV one day and was supremely disappointed that considering the writing talent listed (and not listed) in the credits it just wasn't funny.
Well, that's not entirely true. I did enjoy Woody Allen's bits. "They said Einstein was mad!" "No they didn't." "Well they would have if he had carried on like this."
Posted by: _cG at November 16, 2006 10:03 AM
I am a huge Bond fan but have been extremely dissapointed by the latest installements (basically everything after Goldeneye). WAY TOO MUCH CGI and stupid stupid references to previous films. Of course, when you have a franchise going on as long as the Bond Flix have, its tough not to get lazy.
That being said, I am looking forward to this current Bond. While I might agree with the CraigNotBond people, after looking a the trailers I can only find 1 scene with CGI which bodes well for the film. The thing about Bond films is that this guy does the impossible (stunts, girls, cars) in a real environment. Hopefully Casino Royale (remake and all) brings the franchise back to that place.
Posted by: Pete at November 16, 2006 10:17 AM
I read Pajiba everyday for the prose, reviews and snotty comments. I am 42yr old mother of 4 in IOWA.Thats right,IOWA. I guess that makes me the site loser, but I am trying to convert all of the iowans I know to read Pajiba and get a life. and please no dating corner, go somewhere else.
Posted by: Bethann at November 16, 2006 10:18 AM
Twee, twee, twee....jeez, thats a fun word to say/type. *I heart twee* Anyway, divorced, 40-ish mom of 3 in the "crossroads of America" (that's COLTS country to the rest of the world. Prefer rock and roll to Lisa Loeb, but I do have glasses and I do work in an office. Although, since the advent of "Heroes" horn-rimmed glasses have taken on a whole new meaning.....
I LOVE the comments, and I heart Pajiba!!!
Posted by: dammitjanet at November 16, 2006 10:29 AM
Yeah, I'll cop to it. I'm a 30-something chick, and I wear glasses. Lisa Loeb and Tina Fey have earned my undying thanks for inspiring me to turn my astigmatism into a fashion statement.
And I am not twee, dammit. Sure, I download every song that play's on Grey's Anatomy, and I can't type an email without using half a dozen emoticons, and I always ask for extra foam on my decaf soy caramel mochafrappilattecino from Starbucks, and I drive a pastel VW bug with a bumper sticker that reads "Practice Random Acts of Kindness and Senseless Beauty," but I am not...
Aw, shit...
Posted by: Mustang Sally at November 16, 2006 10:48 AM
What the hell:
Female, 36, glasses, smug, self-congratulatory - check.
On the contrarian side, I'm indifferent to LL, have never owned an mp3 player, am too secular/left-wing to vote for someone like John Kerry or anyone on a US Democratic ticket (if I lived in the US), I don't do bumperstickers and I work from home/in ivory tower lecture halls, not a corporate cubicle. I have also never typed "I heart [ ]."
Pidgeon-hole away--taxonomy makes the common man comfortable.
Posted by: ranylt at November 16, 2006 11:00 AM
Hey, Bethann, you think Iowa's bad, try TEYAXASS.
Actually, no place is really the boonies any more. With an internet connection, anyone anywhere can be informed, erudite and sophisticated (or at least play at it).
I Spade my pets. I Club my spouse sometimes. I don't Heart much of anything except Pajiba.
Posted by: Jerce at November 16, 2006 11:14 AM
If I want to see the movie being reviewed, I'll skip the actual review to avoid spoilers and just read the comments. I'm sure some people get involved in a type-fight and hit refresh every 90 seconds, just waiting for someone to swing back. Highly entertaining.
Anyway, I stopped watching Bond movies after Roger Moore left which, coincidentally, is when I began using thought and humor that extended beyond baseball cards and poop jokes. Anyone can write a Bond script. Just find a website or book that lists cliches and bad puns, throw some explosions and brother-on-sister-like sex scenes in with a slightly altered version of the same villain that could feel comfortable standing behind Hitler at a Nuremburg rally in 1937 and you have yourself a screenplay. Now go out there and be somebody!
Posted by: Kballs at November 16, 2006 11:50 AM
Alright, I'll play...
The people that come here are somewhat smug and self-congratulatory. They seem to be primarily female, probably between the ages of 25-35, I can see them with their Kerry/Edwards bumper stickers, Faint mp3s, horn-rimmed glasses and office jobs. They also type excruciatingly twee things like "I heart this site" or *hides self-esteem under the bed*.
Smug? Check.
Self-congratulatory? Check, but you have to add "self-loathing" to really dig the total existential nihilism inherent in my personality.
Female? Check
25-35? Bzzzzzzt! Oh, SO close. I am 38. And a half.
Kerry bumper sticker? Check. But I also have a "MyLeftWing.Com" sticker (NATCH, since I'm the proprietor thereof), an "Impeach the Entire Bush Administration" sticker, an upside down U.S. flag (and OY, you can't IMAGINE how many people don't know that hanging a flag upside down is an international signal of DISTRESS! Oh, the nasty notes that one's gotten me) and one final sticker that REALLY seems to piss off the 25-35 year old MALES driving around in their big-ass, tiny-dick trucks/SUVs/Hummers: "Bush Voter? ENLIST NOW -- Your President's War NEEDS You!"
Where were we? Oh.
Faint mp3s? I do not understand the reference. I do, however, have a pink metallic covered iPod, whereupon I listen to Bill Maher podcasts and LOTS of Coldplay, James Taylor, Sarah McLachlan and Young Dubliners. Does that count?
Horn-rimmed glasses? Bzzzzz! I have GIANT BLACK SUNGLASSES, like any self-respecting/self-loathing Los Angeles woman between the ages of 17 and 61. It is only when wearing these glasses while bemoaning the fact that we quit smoking 6 months ago and have gained what seems like a pound per day, while perusing the latest Star/Us/In Style issue simultaneously berating and lionising Nicole Richie for her "pin-thin frame" and SUPERB fashion sense that we can truly feel to the closest degree how worthless we really are in this town and, let's face it, on this planet, because we are NOT pin-thin and stylish and rich and young, and wearing those big-ass black sunglasses only serves to EMPHASIZE that fact...
Where was I? Oh.
Office jobs? Bzzzzzt! Boy, you've been off-base for a few items in a row now... I'm starting to worry. As stated elsewhere, I am a political writer/blogger, so unless you count my Ikea-replete living room as an office, that'll be another bzzzzzt.
Typing excrutiatingly twee things like...? Bzzzzzzt! I type excrutiatingly PRETENTIOUS things like, well, that run-on sentence posing as a paragraph above, for example. And lots and lots of what some people call "obscenities," but which I call "my motherfucking style."
So. I'm too bored to count them up, but I think you scored about 50%, which earns a failing grade. So, whoever yopu are, if you happen upon this -- get thee to a couple psychology classes at your local community college and get back to me.
How's THAT for smug and self-congratulatory?
* Makes that face while swaying her jaw and making s a z in the air with snapping fingers, in the manner of a homegirl, but so badly it would reduce said homegirls to trying to decide whether to fall on the floor in hysterical laughter, or beat the shit out of me. *
Okay, I'll give you the "twee."
Posted by: Maryscott O'Connor at November 16, 2006 12:05 PM
MSOC makes me giggle.
I'll bite too:
Female? Nope.
Between 25-35? Damn. Yes.
Kerry-Edwards sticker? Nope. I'm opposed to bumper stickers.
Faint Mp3's? Shit! Right again.
Horn Rimmed glasses? Um, no.
Office job? Yup, though I do spend some time knee deep in muck, so does that even it out a little?
And I've never used the word "twee" in my life, though I do enjoy "squee", "twitter" and the aforementioned "giggle".
Fuck it, "I Am Never Wrong" is a dipshit anyway.
Posted by: TK at November 16, 2006 12:40 PM
Man, since we're doing roll call here.
Female, religious, tends to vote republican. Apparently, I'm the anti-christ.
But damn, the Pajiba movie reviews tend to be spot on. Maybe THAT'S why I read 'em?
Posted by: KC at November 16, 2006 1:19 PM
Delurking for the demographics game. Married Female, age 48, Paralegal for Custom Home Builder in Las Vegas, NV. I read Pajiba because it gives the most honest opinions and reviews. And also the comments leave me giggleliciously verklempt. And oh yeah, I wear Tracy Ellis eyewear, but not horn rimmed (although it's close)!! And in closing I'd just like to add -- I heart the word "squee".
Posted by: Les~ at November 16, 2006 1:24 PM
MSOC - How do you get the different font sizes and Bold to appear? I need to enter codes before and after my text?
Posted by: Brian at November 16, 2006 1:25 PM
Female. 35.Black & Hispanic. No glasses. No bumper stickers. Not sure what twee is. Think the reviews are dead on and am a junkie for clever writing, blog authors and commetors alike.
I do wonder why some folks get so damn pissy on these sites, though... I suppose whatever keeps you from cutting yourself of beating your girlfriend up is okay in my book, "I am Never Wrong". PSYCHO.
Posted by: courtney at November 16, 2006 1:36 PM
Since it's the trend:
Female?: Last, I checked, no.
Between 25-35?: No, 22.
Kerry-Edwards sticker?: No. I liked Kerry but like the last person, I detest bumper stickers. (I do giggle when I see one though!)
Faint Mp3's?: I have a white iPod. (Love my Mugglecasts!)
Horn Rimmed glasses?: I do ware glasses but not horn rimmed.
Office job?: Gosh! First time you're right! (It had to happen eventually!)
"Twee" or "Heart"?:I don't use the words "twee" or I "heart" something.
Well, 1 out of 7 is not bad... Who the hell am I kidding?! Looks like "I'm Never Wrong" is not usually right either... Shame really. I need to start looking for another hero! I wonder if Dustin or Seth is available?
Posted by: Jorge at November 16, 2006 1:39 PM
OK folks, the demographic call out is turning the comment section into a bunch of Myspace "About Me" sections.
Posted by: missmle at November 16, 2006 2:03 PM
okay, am i the only one that's totally stoked about the king dork movie thing? if i am, there's something wrong with the world.
Posted by: kate at November 16, 2006 2:15 PM
Female?: no.
Between 25-35?: 27.
Kerry-Edwards sticker?: No. No car, no bumper sticker. my support goes with my vote. which was for Kerry/Edwards. someone strap a good Presidential candidate to Obama's VP please!
Faint Mp3's?: no. no iPod either. read a damn book on the subway.
Horn Rimmed glasses?: don't need glasses.
Office job?: yep.
"Twee" or "Heart"?: huh? I guess that is a "no."
and yes, I do stroll the comments for the reasons cited above. the comments here are great.
re: new 007. I've been a 007 fan since I was very little. I had VHS to VHS dubs all over the haus. I have all the Connery/Moore on VHS. The Brosnan thing went straight downhill. and the whole "darker" thing is what they went with Timothy Dalton (from Flash Gordon!). I like Mr. Craig's look, and Judi Dench as M (still a great casting choice - will Cleese return as Q?), but, eh...I dunno if I can drop NYC movie ticket prices on it yet...
Posted by: b_g at November 16, 2006 2:23 PM
Female? Yes!
Between 25-35? 30
Kerry-Edwards sticker? Nope.
Mp3? iPod Nano given as a gift, still in box.
Glasses? Nope.
Office job? Yes.
I have admittedly used *your action here* but have never said "I HEART...".
I too come to Pajiba for fairly trustworthy and entertaining movie reviews. I read the comment threads on nearly every website I frequent. I suppose they give me a little voyeuristic perspective on how other people perceive movies/video clips/news articles...etc.
Posted by: Me at November 16, 2006 2:43 PM
Here we go.
Female?: Indeed.
Between 25-35?: No, 16.
Kerry-Edwards sticker?: I probably would if I was american, had a car and would ever consider having a damn bumper sticker
Faint Mp3's?: Faint? I have an iPod called iTilly, but I wouldn't say faint.
Horn Rimmed glasses?: No, but they totally would be if I wore glasses.
Office job?: I'm a student, but aspiring astrophysicist... so yeah, I'll probably end up sitting in a Starbucks for hours with a pink laptop drinking cold coffee
"Twee" or "Heart"?: Everything's twee in Julia's world. I don't heart much though, I'm a miserable git.
I caught casino royale on telly when I was about 10 and remember being confused, because it wasn't the REAL James Bond. It was crazy. I mean, all former James Bonds just sorta merge into eachother at that age and I couldn never tell the difference (except Connery, Connery rocks) but this guy, who the fuck was that? Anyway, seeing the new one with the OAP in it this weekend.
psh
Posted by: Julia at November 16, 2006 2:44 PM
Not too frequent a poster, but I might as well join in: female, 28, 20/20 vision, work for a politician, disagree with most of his politics...still have my 'John Kerry For President' baby-doll tee. And I big, glittery heart Pajiba..it's become part of my morning routine.
Posted by: Kolby at November 16, 2006 2:47 PM
Julia - Faint is a band
http://www.allmusic.com/cg/amg.dll
Posted by: Brian at November 16, 2006 3:10 PM
This time with the correct link
http://www.allmusic.com/cg/amg.dll?p=amg&searchlink=FAINT&sql=11:ruabqj5iojka~T0
Posted by: Brian at November 16, 2006 3:12 PM
No demographic info is forthcoming, but based on the comments, which I read voraciously, I'd say most people are over 35 if only because of the amazingly high percentage of posters who can actually construct a sentence complete with all requisite components (and yes, I know there are a few under 35 outliers who probably can do this also, but you are few and far between). But I am in hearty agreement with those who find Pajiba commentators more entertaining than others.
My favourite post to date:
On the discussion of songs from musicals several weeks ago, a poster noted that Sound of Music was forever dead to her because it inspired her parents to name her after one of the characters. About seven posts down, someone wrote "Edelweiss, is that you?" I'm still laughing.
Posted by: Siobhan at November 16, 2006 3:38 PM
As far as the demographic, I am male, 22, college grad in political science, without a job, wear contacts, have an ipod I haven't used in a while, am an independent who voted for neither Kerry or Bush just to spite the system, and listen to classic hard rock and metal.
I was a fan of Brosnan as Bond. I think it is a generation thing with the Bond franchise. Goldeneye hit me right at the perfect age and the video game that spawned from it is one of the greatest ever. I loved Goldeneye and I thought a couple of the latest films have had their moments. I will probably like Craig, but not as much as Brosnan
Posted by: Dave at November 16, 2006 3:42 PM
42 yo GWM, shaved head, ISO Pajiba-reading GWM for LTR ASAP. U2 on MP3. L8R
Posted by: Bub at November 16, 2006 4:10 PM
Siobhan, that was me who was named after the Sound of Music, and the Edelweiss comment *still* makes me spit up beverages every now and then. I wish I remembered who said it.
But, I was named after a male character in SOM, since I am... well... male.
But that was the moment I truly appreciated the comments section.
And Brosnan was a stuffy, borderline effete, Bond (IMO). Craig looks to be a real return to the Bond of Flemings books, which is a good thing. The thing about Bond was - he wasn't a smooth womanizer, or a playboy, or any of those things. He was a stone killer who was *really good* at pretending to be those things, to get the job done.
Posted by: TK at November 16, 2006 4:18 PM
Just a little history lesson on the old Casino Royale: One studio bought the rights to Casino Royale. For whatever reason, they never got around to making it (no good script, no money--whatever. One of those things). Meanwhile, another studio bought the rights to Dr. No and actually got it made, as I'm sure you all recall. Now, studio #1 has the rights to a movie it can't really make (Connery's contract had all sorts of exclusivity clauses, and who wanted to make a Bond film without Connery?), so it decided to cash in on the success of Dr. No & the burgeoning Bond franchise by turning Casino Royale into a Bond spoof. Hence Woody and Peter and--correct me if I'm wrong, here--David Niven.
At least that's the way I heard it.
Posted by: My Two Cents at November 16, 2006 4:38 PM
"Bub the Stud" folks! Pick him up before he's gone! No takers? Good! He's mine!
Posted by: Jorge at November 16, 2006 4:42 PM
Weinsteins/Blockbuster: I haven't been in a Blockbuster since 1991? 1992? (Haven't been in a Hollywood Video in a good tens years either.)
And The Brothers W have long since pissed me off with their constant purchasing, butchering and refusal to release the asian films they purchase. Bastards.
However, their years of influence and relevance are well-past and now thankfully history. Hooray!
James Bond film: I can tell you the exact moment I said to myself, "Good God, I will never see another Bond film again the rest of my life."
Octopussy, first run. Bond flying airplane sideways through closing airport hanger doors. Flys out other side.
Wow. Like we thought it would turn out differently. Massive indifference & Bond apathy showered over me.
The Transporter films are the new, improved, better Bond type film.
Posted by: SpiceLux at November 16, 2006 4:50 PM
HAH, "I Am Never Wrong,"... Get your facts straight! I am a self-congratulatory twenty-FOUR year old, with cats-eyes glasses, an "OBAMA!" bumper sticker and a teaching job.
And my MP3s are never faint. I play 'em so loud I'll probably go deaf.
Put that in your pipe and smoke it!
That said, you are right on about "Let's Go To Prison." When I saw Will Arnett was going to be in it and that it had very likely a lame and contrived Brokeback parody element to it, I wanted to weep the death of GOB Bluth.
Posted by: tetetetigi at November 16, 2006 5:32 PM
Oh fine,
Female, yes.
25-35, yes.
Kerry sticker, yes (tattered, but still there).
Glasses, no switched to contacts (btw my husband loves Lisa Loeb, loves her, so maybe I should be wearing said glasses...)
i-pod nano (I'm so uncool)
No office job. I, too, teach and am also in a fairly out of the way state -- New Mexico (yes, a *state* - at least no one mistakes Iowa for a foreign country.
Finally, am not at all 'twee', but do love Pajiba!
Posted by: Alarmjaguar at November 16, 2006 6:52 PM
male. 34. engaged. soon-to-be-unemployed office worker. complicated registered republican who voted 50/50 for dems and reps this time, but I find it amusing to bait communist feminazi tree-huggers (though I do admire their passion) and I despise the religious Moral Majority assholes (did anyone hear that Ted Haggard is gay? he he). I wear glasses (but not horn rims) and I am definitely smug and self-conratulatory. Hooray for my elitism! don't have an ipod/mp3 player as, like my response to this thread, I am usually a couple steps behind everyone else.
Also, I am dumb enough to mispronounce Pajiba, even though I know better.
Who's the lucky SOB who gets to review Happy Feet?
Posted by: mike at November 16, 2006 6:54 PM
Being the lemming (tastes of human, sir!) that I am I will come down from my high loft/ivory tower/basement and meddle with the mortals
I am 25, not in the least self-congratulatory, but I am smug. *winks*...Last time I checked I was male, but with the world as it is today that could change at a moments notice...I abhorred Kerry/Edwards (Hurray! Hurray!) and I would most certainly not put such a sticker on my vehicle (I prefer "I heart Super Vibracion!")...As for music, Faint is the farthest from the truth. Try anything from Slayer to Michael Buble and you might peg me down, but let it be known that that list would never contain Faint...No horn-rimmed glasses here, just glasses...A wonderful office job, at which I am currently at, at a meat-packing plant (I heart meat!!!)...and I will twee ocassionally *smacks head at the admission*...Oh, and I heart ellipses
Posted by: ScarletKnight at November 16, 2006 9:11 PM
TK: Glad you got in touch. I'm so sorry, I just assumed you were female. The fact that you're male makes the "Edelweiss" comment even more hilarious. I also wish I could remember who posted it. Now whenever I see your posts, I'll think "ah yes, there goes Edelweiss again"!
Posted by: Siobhan at November 16, 2006 9:52 PM
A no for all of those questions.
Posted by: The Stew at November 16, 2006 11:16 PM
Don't know if someone else has said this, but the "Casino Royale" that was on BBC was a made-for-TV spoof from the 70s. The new one (based on an actual Ian Fleming novel) is some bullshit story about a poker game. Whoop-de-effin-do.
Posted by: nadha at November 17, 2006 1:12 AM
And although female, I am not Loeb-esque. At all.
Posted by: nadha at November 17, 2006 1:13 AM
To me, Paul Feig will always be the skinny guy in Heavyweights, covered in chocolate syrup.
And I am not (yet) 25, and.. vaguely Loeb-esque. (I have glasses. Does that count?) Also, Canadian, but I probably would've voted for Kerry, had I the chance. (At least I didn't vote for Harper.) No office job, though. Sigh. Damn pie-making job.
"And my MP3s are never faint. I play 'em so loud I'll probably go deaf."
Hear, hear. I've been known to crank my music, and have been caught rocking out on the walk home.
Will probably end up checking out Casino Royale this weekend, as the brat is a Bond geek. Otherwise, Stranger than Fiction, and the Illusionist (YAY $5 Theatre!)
Posted by: Mara at November 17, 2006 8:33 AM
Siobhan, now I'm thinking of switching from TK to Edelweiss... hmmm...
Posted by: TK at November 17, 2006 9:26 AM
Yes, I (for the most part, being slightly younger and Canadian) fit the described demographic; HOWEVER, I find it more than a little weird that some of the commenters took it upon themselves to write so self-gratifyingly, offering up paragraph upon paragraph of ego-talk here. What the hell, ladies? Close your browser and get back to that report before the boss catches you! After I post this I know I will. And no more of that *heart* shit!
Posted by: B at November 17, 2006 11:40 AM
Well, not only do I get a mention from the main man, but everyone took it upon themselves to prove me right/wrong. I think I hit the mark a decent bit. Yeah, it was a generalization, of course not everyone is like that, but a lot of you are. Besides, I was just irked that everyone was picking on "Joe" just for speaking his mind. What does that say about us? Hell, if someone came on here talking up Freddie Prinze Jr movies then by Odin that's his right.
I will say I'm shocked that hardly anyone knew who the Faint was. They're a band on Saddle Creek records. Most of you would probably like them.
Anyway, no offense meant, all in good fun, just can't cotton to self-congratulatory smugness, so let's be a little more civil to our red-staters and mainstreamers out there, huh? We're all complicated little wonders, like gay Republicans or racist Democrats.
I'm off to listen to my Cat Power mp3s... oh, I'm such a hypocrite.
Posted by: I Am Never Wrong at November 17, 2006 2:28 PM
I Am Never Wrong, to quote Peter Venkman, I'm gonna take back some of the things I said about you.
Internet hugs all around!
Posted by: TK at November 17, 2006 4:21 PM
Not that anyone cares, but I hate being pigeon-holed. So take your demographic and suck it.
Female? Yeah. I'm pretty surprised at how many readers are, though. For some reason, I just pictured a lot of male hipster neo-geeks.
Between 25-35? I'm 16.
Kerry-Edwards sticker? Don't have a car yet. Or a license. I would have voted democratic if I could've, but I think bumper stickers are stupid.
mp3? Yeah, but whatever the hell "Faint mp3"s are, I dont have that. I listen to a lot of different stuff, mostly classic rock or indie. Little bit of hair metal and grunge.
Glasses? Yes, but if I do ever get horn-rimmed glasses, it'll mean that I'm killing myself the next day.
Office job? No. I'm a senior in high-school.
I will agree though, most of the posters try really fucking hard to be clever. And it shows.
*pretends to be ironic by using asterisk-quotes in subjectless third person*
(but who the hell is Lisa Loeb?)
Posted by: bleh at November 18, 2006 8:51 AM
bleh, honey, you aren't old enough to remember Lisa Loeb.
Posted by: nadha at November 18, 2006 5:41 PM
I'll bite:
Female: Yes.
Between 22 and 35: Why yes, I'm 23.
Kerry/Edwards sticker: No, I don't put stickers on my car.
Faint MP3s: Yes, I have an iPod, and yes, I like The Faint. I also like other pretentious bands like Stars, Metric, and Mates Of State.
Glasses: Yes, but I tend to wear contacts more often.
Office job: Yes and no. I work in a health center and divide my time between the clinic and my office upstairs.
Twee: You're goddamn right I am. I'm really motherfucking profane, too. Bitches. *spews off stream of curses*
Posted by: Sarah at November 18, 2006 8:25 PM
Female,
28,
I have bumper stickers, but nothing political. Mine are about worshiping the Goddess and loving my pitbulls.
I have an Ipod, it makes flying easier.
I don't know who the Faint are, but they sound like they wear eyeliner and not ironically.
Yes, I wear the Loeb glasses. Also, I have similar hair. But I don't wear khakis, I hate Starbucks and people who order things grande and venti, and I cringe at those smiley/frowny wastes of useful grammar tools.
No office job, I'm a children's librarian. I'm from Arkansas, so I'm betting that I catch more shit than people from Iowa (though probably not Texas).
And what the fuck does "twee" mean?
Posted by: porkchop at November 20, 2006 12:46 AM
Gee, "I am Never Wrong" left out the part about our numerous cats and the tubs of ice cream we cry into while we watch Lifetime Television for Womens. I am thinking maybe "I am Never Original" might be a more appropriate name.
Why people come to this site, which is obviously written by mostly left-leaning contributors who are not quiet about said leaning, and then complain about the fact that mostly left-leaning people comment. Don't you have some FOX News to watch or something? (See, I can be unoriginal, too!)
Posted by: amberlynne at November 20, 2006 7:41 PM
Is twee perhaps a misspelled "tween"? OMG I HEART I amNeverWrong. Y'all got pwned. Wait, did I just cross over from tween to l33t?
Posted by: Mystery of Twee at November 22, 2006 7:21 PM
Well, someone's gotta do it...I will stand up and say, I liked the original 'Casino Royale' with David Niven, Woody Allen, Orson Welles (!), Peter Sellars, Deborah Kerr, and Ursual Andress. This may have something to do with first seeing it at age 10, and thinking Ursula was a goddess on earth. I believe I was stoned most other times I saw it. Hey, Netflix it and try it.
A lot of the humor was vaudeville-corny, but a lot was subtle and laugh-out-loud. Like -
SPOILER ALERT! For the book, haven't seen the new movie -
In the book, Bond is captured by the villain, whom he's just fleeced in a card game. The villain tortures Bond by tieing him naked in a chair with no bottom, and beating Bond's balls with a carpet-beater. Not sure we'll see that one in the new movie. So, in the movie, Orson Welles (who never breaks character once) captures Peter Sellars as Bond, who wakes up in a chair with no bottom. Sellars comments on this, and Welles rather blandly says, "Yes, we've been meaning to get that re-upholstered..."
Stuff like that. I say rent it!
Oh yeah,
age 41
Contact lenses
Kerry bumper sticker, in South Carolina
Not a LL fan, but she can rock a black thong my way any day. Hey, it just popped up! On the internet! In this room I was passing by, and I turned my head to sneeze, and....
Posted by: Cat brother at November 22, 2006 8:55 PM
I am actually pretty horrified by how spot on that description was.
The people that come here are somewhat smug and self-congratulatory. They seem to be primarily female, probably between the ages of 25-35, I can see them with their Kerry/Edwards bumper stickers, Faint mp3s, horn-rimmed glasses and office jobs. They also type excruciatingly twee things like "I heart this site" or *hides self-esteem under the bed*.
Me: 26, female, liberal, office job and I do actually have a bunch of Mp3's of The Faint. Considering I'm the only person I know who even knows who they are, I was never aware that occasionally enjoying their music branded me as any sort of stereotype. No glasses as I naturally have 20/20 vision thank you. And as evidenced in that last sentence, I can definitely be smug and self-congratulatory. But clearly the writer of the quoted statement is guilty of that, too. And so what?
However, I never type the kind of crap that's in the last two sentences.
So I am the person being described in that arrogant statement, but I don't really see a problem here. Smart writing attracts smart people, hence my Pajibaship. I am not ashamed.
Posted by: Eva at November 24, 2006 6:13 PM
I thought the Pajiba demographic was summed up in the title--bitchy people. I qualify! 32, left-leaning mother of two married to a right-leaning accountant--I tend to hide my bitchiness under a serene exterior, though.
Posted by: Lainie at November 28, 2006 5:22 PM

