Pajiba's Privacy Policy



toilet.jpg
Toilet Humor

Flushed Away / Phillip Stephens

The ongoing popularity of traditional stop-motion claymation is evident not only in the fact that Aardman Features continues to make successful films but that its latest, Flushed Away, is not claymation, but computer-generated to look like claymation. It may seem paradoxical to some, and purists will be disappointed, but apparently Aardman opted for CG when it became obvious that a story revolving largely around water would be impossible to duplicate convincingly with clay.

The result is a kind of hybrid that retains the charming look of claymation, replete with the “imperfections” of that medium such as fingerprints and dropped-frames, but is much too fluid and visual to appear as stop-motion. It doesn’t quite feel like a true Aardman film, but the animators take advantage of the computers to create a richly nuanced visual experience, and the spirit remains tied to the droll wit and spastic energy of English comedy.

In the upper-class London ‘burb of Kensington, a snobby rat named Roddy (voiced by Hugh Jackman) lives a pampered yet isolated existence. He entertains himself thoroughly while his owners are on holiday until a sewer rat named Sid (Shane Richie) crashes the party and flushes Roddy into the subterranean world. In his attempts to find passage back to the surface, Roddy quickly becomes embroiled in a struggle between a ship-owner/scavenger named Rita (Kate Winslet) and a sort-of criminal kingpin, the Toad (Ian McKellen). After initial setbacks, Rita and Roddy team up with the Toad and his minions (among them: Andy Serkis, Bill Nighy, and Jean Reno as “The Frog” [har har]) in pursuit.

Flushed Away begins with a manic intensity that takes some getting used to, but once the pace is set, it’s easy to accept the frenzied motions of the plot and inherent silliness of everyone involved. The film successfully walks the line between adult and child-oriented comedy, something neither Disney nor DreamWorks have been able to do on their own for years now. The action is extremely fast-paced and gags run aplenty, but there are enough quirky references to keep older kids and adults entertained. The energy of Flushed Away doesn’t leave a lot of room for much emotive response to the characters, as with a Pixar flick, but there’s enough to make it more than mindless entertainment; think of Chicken Run amped up a lot.

Aiding the movie greatly is its excellent voice casting, which gives the inherently English humor a firm grounding. Both Jackman and Winslet have pleasantly euphonic voices suitable to their characters, while McKellen and Reno chew their scenes (so to speak) as pompous amphibians. But it’s Bill Nighy who really churns out the laughter as a goofy albino. The voice work of Flushed Away achieves an excellent simultaneity with the faux clay art that is really rather funny in itself. Overall, this is a fun, if breezy little movie that should please everyone who sees it.

Phillip Stephens is the lead critic for Pajiba. He lives in Fayetteville, AR.


Pajiba Love 11/02/06 | | Santa Clause 3: The Escape Clause, The



Comments

As a fan of animation in general and Aardman in particular, I'm definetely going to see this. Although this review adressed most of the concerns I had after seeing the trailers, It lacked the bias, subjectivity and comparisons I keep coming back to Pajiba for. It was all there, kind of, but still...

Posted by: Sunsneezer at November 4, 2006 1:07 AM

Hey Sunsneezer, you just reviewed a movie review. What a strange world we live in.

Posted by: jbrader at November 4, 2006 1:24 AM

Hey jbrader: your review of Sunsneezer's review of Phillip's review was quite concise.
Wait, is that another review?

Posted by: TMax at November 4, 2006 11:04 AM

Yay! Something I can actually take my children to! (There have been scads of movies out this year that I'm SUPPOSED to want to take my children to, but I like my kids more than that.) We'll definitely check this one out.

Posted by: Edith at November 4, 2006 7:08 PM

My friend and I saw the preview for this before a pretty adult movie that was nonetheless filled with teenage movie-goers. When the "surprised slugs" hit the screen, we guffawed so loudly heads turned. We knew then this movie would be good, and were happy that junior highers would probably skip it, thinking it was a shitty kids' movie. I'm not proud - this looked hilarious to me, and if it's Chicken Run amped up, it's right up my alley. I'll see it this weekend.

Posted by: Kitty X at November 7, 2006 1:05 PM

I saw it last weekend with my 10-year-old. Clever, and very fun.
I'll repeat what Edith said a bit by stating that this year has seen some of the most abominable children's films ever, truly. I don't think any amount of Aardman goodness will wash away the stink that was "Barnyard Animals" or whatever that horror was called and that Shaggy Dog retread may very well be the worst film ever made.

Posted by: imk at November 7, 2006 2:45 PM

I saw it last weekend with my husband, we don't have kids I just like funny cartoons.

And we loved it! It was funny, and the Slugs were awesome!!! I loved the Slugs, they kept cracking me up. I'm pretty immature though.

Posted by: lea at November 9, 2006 7:04 PM

TMax: I do believe that was a review. And it was good.

Posted by: Kathy at November 10, 2006 2:49 PM

i took my 4 and 6 year olds to see this... my husband was laughing so hard i think he peed his pants. truly, everyone in the theater was having a rolling good time.

actually, i think we enjoyed it even more than our kids did... i actually think i would pay to see it again - and STILL buy the DVD when it comes out.

Posted by: jen at November 12, 2006 10:30 PM

i took my 4 and 6 year olds to see this... my husband was laughing so hard i think he peed his pants. truly, everyone in the theater was having a rolling good time.

actually, i think we enjoyed it even more than our kids did... i actually think i would pay to see it again - and STILL buy the DVD when it comes out.

Posted by: jen at November 12, 2006 10:30 PM

This wasn't bad but not as good as you people are making it out to be. Pixar still rule when it comes to funny cartoons both in storyline and graphics. It was still worth watching though.

Posted by: Chris at December 11, 2006 12:41 PM

I never saw Nick Park in the credits for this film. Nick Park is the one who made it famous. Aardman was nothing until Nick Park came out with Wallace & Grommit. It was definitely lacking what Wallace & Grommit had.

Posted by: Jason at June 9, 2007 10:29 PM