free counter with statistics Wendy and Lucy Review | Pajiba - Scathing Reviews for Bitchy People

wlucy2jpg
Yeah. But Does the Dog Die?

Wendy and Lucy / Dustin Rowles

Film Reviews | December 29, 2008 | Comments (24)


Wendy and Lucy is precisely the kind of film made for MOVIE CRITICS. It’s a film, perhaps, that only a MOVIE CRITIC could truly love — slow, dreary, tediously grim, kind of pointless, but ultimately moving, that is, if you haven’t already been moved out of your seat and into a theater with a louder, more pointless but less tedious film about a dog that actually does bite it in the end. See, for instance, Lisa Schwarzbaum, who LOVED Wendy and Lucy, and she should know! She’s an irksome, self-important blatherer who is going down with pop-culture’s Titanic, Entertainment Weekly (and the poor woman’s head is being pushed into the water by a million tweenery twatwaffles trying to stay afloat by using her body as a lifeboat). I suppose, too, that the MOVIE CRITIC part of my brain appreciated Wendy and Lucy; unfortunately, the part of my brain that wanted to be entertained or enlightened or touched just kept poking the MOVIE CRITIC part of my brain with a sharp stick and yelling, “When is something going to happen? I hate you. Why did you have to be a movie critic? You suck. I hope you die.”

It’s hard to describe Wendy and Lucy; it’s too simple, really, to be pretentious, and lacks the requisite quirky characters to qualify as a winsome indie flick. It’s not a character study, a relationship drama, or a slice-of-life film, either. It’s just kind of one of those films where somebody walks around, stares out windows, and looks at trees, and somebody else with a camera follows behind filming the person walking around, staring out windows, and looking at trees.

Wendy and Lucy is a lot like the Michael J. Fox movie, Doc Hollywood, only Wendy (Michelle Williams) is not a doctor, or rich, and there are no folksy townspeople doling out life lessons. But, her car does break down, stranding her in some small, remote town in the Northwest. Wendy is unemployed and, with the little money she has, is making her way toward Alaska, where she believes she’ll find summer work and, I suppose, some purpose. With a tiny budget and a car that won’t run, Wendy is caught shoplifting IAMS for her dog, Lucy. She’s subsequently booked and fingerprinted and is forced to spend a few hours in jail. During that time, Lucy — who was tied up to a bicycle rack outside the grocery store — disappears, and Wendy spends the rest of the film desperately trying to track her down, mostly by walking around, staring out windows, and looking at trees (though, she also spends some time talking to an older gentlemen with crazy eyebrows, who lets her borrow his cell phone).

There’s really not much else to say about Wendy and Lucy. The cinematography is decidedly indie, the script — adapted by a Jonathon Raymond short story by the director, Kelly Reichart (Old Joy) — doesn’t throw a lot of words at you, and the direction is smartly spare. It’s a bleak but realistic film, and like real life, Wendy’s biggest problems are mundane. But when you’re passing through while living out of your car, even the most mundane problems can be difficult to overcome.

But what makes Wendy and Lucy an objectively good film — whether or not it’s something you’d actually want to see — is the remarkable, heartbreaking performance of Michelle Williams. She’s unbelievable — she’s more than just a bad haircut and cheap clothes. Williams embodies this aimless woman who loves her dog, and she somehow makes this tedious film about a woman walking around, staring out windows, and looking at trees an engaging one to watch. It’s not entertaining or really that interesting, but Williams impossibly makes it worth paying attention to all the same.

Dustin Rowles is the publisher of Pajiba. He lives withi his wife and son in Portland, Maine You can reach him via email, or leave a comment below.


HBO Signs Up Maria Bello | Time Warner to Pull Viacom Cable Channels



Comments

Dogs are quietly much more intelligent than people give them credit for. Lucy probably ran away to star in another more thoughtful and provoking movie. Like Air Bud 7: The Kibbleman Cometh.

Posted by: stipe42 at December 24, 2008 10:28 AM

At some point, I'll have to see this, if only because I [heart] Michelle Williams. Come back, Cecil!

But for serious: Does the dog bite it?

Posted by: rikkitikkitavi at December 24, 2008 10:33 AM

Do you think Old Yeller could have been made today? Rabid dog, kid has to shoot it with a gun, depressing ending for a kiddie movie?

Posted by: BWeaves at December 24, 2008 10:38 AM

Is that Michelle Williams in the photo? I thought it was the Nazi kid from the Pajama movie.

Posted by: BWeaves at December 24, 2008 10:40 AM

yea... I had to do a double take on the pic at the top too.

Posted by: Tammers at December 24, 2008 11:03 AM

Yes Bweaves, except for the chain link fence, the plaid shirt, and the JCrew sweater.

Posted by: Pookie at December 24, 2008 11:05 AM

After reading a good review of this film, I Netflicked the director's last one, Old Joy, and kind of felt the same good and "meh" reactions. The characters were tense, and it made me tense, and movies have taught us that tension always blossoms into chaos--the dog will run away and/or die (it's the same dog! the director puts her dog in her movies!); one guy will make an awkward/unwelcome pass at the other; hill people armed with iron tools with descend, bent on violent/sexopathic mayhem....

Anyways, I was pretty sure it wasn't a movie like that, but, jeez--anything can happen, you know. And DOES, all the time! I read the papers!

No real point, here. Sometimes I like movies like this. My life's done for the day; think I'll watch someone else's.

Posted by: pk at December 24, 2008 11:08 AM

I was already convinced by that still alone when looking through said Entertainment Weekly actually, and I can obviously tell it's not exactly a fun movie before the dog dies, if it in fact does. I'm trying to not feel desperate and panicky these days (not that I should, I'm just good at it) so I've gotta say "yep, I bet that movie's objectively good" and leave it at that.

Most of Lisa's list didn't trouble me too much, but she is of course my enemy, along with Owen and Ranylt, to name a few, for trashing "Speed Racer". So go ahead and hate on her all you like.

Posted by: Jay at December 24, 2008 11:27 AM

Merry Christmas! I'm an open minded girl from US, I'm interested in exotic things, photography, dating and sports...I have my photos on ---Tallhub.com---, I love tall guys!
Do you love traveling and have some experience? Just find me out.

Posted by: kent at December 24, 2008 11:40 AM

This is the kind of film I go to the theater and drool over. Leave the explosions, fart jokes, and rampant sex to the unjaded masses. All I need is a questionably pretty/good looking actor in a mundane, depressing situation giving a strong performance while staring wistfully at clouds and walking on train tracks. That's when I start to get excited. This is MY Iron Man.

My father and brother scream, laugh, and celebrate over football games; I do it for PBS broadcasts of musicals and plays. Potato. Tomato.

Posted by: Robert at December 24, 2008 11:52 AM

The fuck's questionable about Michelle Williams being pretty? That has never been a question, Robert!

Posted by: Jay at December 24, 2008 11:59 AM

The dog does not die, you are safe on that count at least.
Years ago, I was making a movie choice with my then boyfriend. He wanted to see 'Single White Female." I nixed that because I had heard that a puppy died, and Iknew I could not subject myself to that! (Even though a friend of mine worked on that film-I had to lie and pretend to her that I had seen it.) Instead we saw "Dominick and Eugene"--where it turned out that a dog is struck by a car and killed in the first 10 minutes of the movie! So I appreciate having this kind of info, and hope you will, too.

Posted by: pugalug at December 24, 2008 12:52 PM

Jay, questionably pretty normally refers to an Angela Bettis type or a gorgeous actress somewhat uglyfied (really normalized) for a tiny film. Obviously, since this is Michelle Williams, the questionable only comes from that hair color and a whole lot of crying. If Brokeback Mountain is a good indicator, she's not a pretty crier.

Posted by: Robert at December 24, 2008 1:33 PM

I thought it was fantastic. I am, though, a sucker for any movie that prominently features the sound of trains going by.

Also there's one scene here, for anyone that's seen it, that's TERRIFYING (in the woods).

Posted by: Kevin Longrie at December 24, 2008 2:12 PM

Also she kept calling for her dog saying "LUCY...LUCY...LU...LUCY...LU" I kept waiting for Lucy Liu (or Lucy Luibot) to come out of the bushes.

Posted by: Kevin Longrie at December 24, 2008 2:14 PM

Posted by: Jay at December 24, 2008 2:28 PM

"Does the dog die?" That's the least of my questions. "Doc Hollywood" had Julie Warner's tits. Does this one have any?

It had to be asked.

Posted by: bucdaddy at December 24, 2008 5:03 PM

"Doc Hollywood" had Julie Warner's tits. Does this one have any?

Who wouldn't forego a career as a Hollywood plastic surgeon for those all-natural mutant jellyfish on Julie Warner? Mmmmm, girl urine scaring away deer. Mmmmmm. Also, Merlin the magician is in it.

Posted by: rikkitikkitavi at December 24, 2008 9:25 PM

"Yeah, but does the Dog Die?" should also be the title of Pajiba's Marley and Me review.

Posted by: Withnail at December 26, 2008 2:15 AM

I went to see this today, at a cheapo $4 matinee on a cold grey day. I was amazingly touched, since I am now also out of work, counting change I find in the sofa cushions,and terrified something like this might happen to me: I might have to make a choice between survival and some(thing)(one)I love. Thats really the issue here. She loves Lucy enough to let her stay in the yard with the nice older gentleman, rather than drag her along not eating on her trip into an uncertain future. If that aint love, nothing is. I loved this film.

Posted by: devildoggie at January 2, 2009 11:42 PM

I went to see this today, at a cheapo $4 matinee on a cold grey day. I was amazingly touched, since I am now also out of work, counting change I find in the sofa cushions,and terrified something like this might happen to me: I might have to make a choice between survival and some(thing)(one)I love. Thats really the issue here. She loves Lucy enough to let her stay in the yard with the nice older gentleman, rather than drag her along not eating on her trip into an uncertain future. If that aint love, nothing is. I loved this film.

Posted by: devildoggie at January 2, 2009 11:43 PM

What a horrible "reviewer" you are. When you turn 14, please start studying how to write and describe properly. After reading your review, I felt I was owed 2 whole minutes of my life back and the cost would be in the millions, jerk. I will avoid your crap next time.

Posted by: up at January 8, 2009 5:19 PM

I loved this movie, and I am not a film critic. I also love Chekov's plays and short stories, and I am not a drama of book critic. Your review strikes me as self-aggrandizing and sophomoric.

Posted by: Tija Spitsberg at February 19, 2009 4:42 PM

Tedious and very slow film. It was like watching paint dry. Did not enjoy it at all.

Posted by: Jaybird at February 23, 2009 8:46 AM