web
counter
 

In Defense of Facebook and Twitter. And F**k Dot Com Blow-Outs

By Dustin Rowles | Posted Under Film Reviews | Comments (31)



We_Live_in_Public.jpg

For reasons that I’ll explain below, I call bullshit on Ondi Timoner’s documentary We Live in Public, which tracks the rise and fall of a somewhat obscure but innovative Internet pioneer, Josh Harris. Josh Harris is a fuckwit, but he was a somewhat prescient fuckwit who just happened to come up with an obvious idea before everyone else did and made millions before Wall Street realized he was too far ahead of his time.

Harris, who started out as a market researcher in the early 90s, was an early adapter: He jumped on the Internet almost immediately, and rode it like a stallion fucking a toy dog, trying to fit something into an Internet world that was too small and not yet built for it. Harris — a nerdy, schlubby motherfucker — was a forerunner of chat rooms. In 1993, he created Pseudo.com, which aired live audio and video webcasting or, essentially, Web TV, which combined video with chat rooms on Prodigy, allowing viewers to comment and interact while watching Pseudo programming. There were even channels were you could watch an interact with streaming porn (all done over dial-up, mind you) and a networking gaming station devoted to Doom II. Based on Pseudo.com’s potential, Harris was able to take it public and was soon worth $80 million (at least on paper). Unfortunately, Harris was not just a nerdy pioneer, he also wanted to be an artiste, so he soon created his own alternate personality, Luvvy, a deranged clown that wasn’t looked upon too fondly by the corporate world.

Harris was soon bought out of Pseudo.com (which later folded in the dot com bust, in part, because the dial-up world wasn’t ready for streaming TV), and used his millions to fund some human experiments with media. Most notably was “Quiet: We Live in Public,” an Orwellian experiment in which 100 or so bohemian types (including this doc’s director) lived in an underground terrarium for the 30 days leading up to the millennium. In that pod-filled bunker — sort of a “Big Brother” filled with 100 Berkley grads, or my worst fucking nightmare — everyone was on camera at all times; cameras watched while people fucked, shat, and ate. Food and drugs were supplied, for free, though the participants weren’t allowed to leave the bunker and were, at times, subject to interrogation. Oh, there was also a shooting range inside the bunker and enough weapons to take out half of Manhattan, which seems like just the sort of thing you’d want in a claustrophobic environment full of drugs and orgies. The cops shut it down on New Year’s Day, but not before Harris basically proved that people will do anything if there’s a camera on them.

Soon after that, Harris — who is one spectacularly socially retarded guy — somehow secured a girlfriend (one of the online personalities at Pseudo.com) and they decided to try another experiment: Using motion sensitive cameras, they basically created their own EDtv: Their every conversation, every movement, every screw, and every argument was streamed, live, onto the Internet (there were even cameras in the toilet, so you could witness the underside of Harris’ ass do its magic). Viewers could live-comment, which meant that after their arguments the two could go back to their computers and see whose side their audience was one. Obviously, the relationship crumbled. Harris went broke, went into a downward spiral of depression, moved to an Apple Orchard (before later moving to Ethiopia), and has basically been MIA for the last decade.

But if you believe Ondi Timooner and her documentary — which bills Harris as an internet pioneer who blazed a trail that led us to MySpace, Facebook, and Twitter — Harris has had a massive influence on the Internet. He’s also one of the many poster children of the dot com excesses — he threw lavish, million-dollar parties, basically tossing his money into a toilet. But We Live in Public is, more than anything, a statement about our culture’s unyielding need for fame, and how we’ve used the Internet to fuel our addiction to attention. That’s the more sinister side of it, the side gets most of the attention, thanks to people like Julia Allison and a wealth of other Internet Celebrities. But I’d argue that Harris had a very tenuous connection, at any rate, with Social Media, and that it’s not nearly as sinister as Harris so “presciently” predicted. Harris posited, through his human/media experimentation, that the Internet and its ability to allow us to live in a world in which were all capable of sharing our lives on a massive scale, would create alienation, make us all a lot more lonely.

And that’s why I call bullshit on We Live in Public. That hasn’t been the result of the Internet. In fact, as Seth very eloquent argued, in many respects, it’s had the complete opposite effect.

Gone are the days when a beloved public figure passes and you don’t hear about it until the evening news, and don’t read something moving about it until the next morning’s paper or the next week’s issue of some magazine. Gone are the days when a beloved private figure passes and is only mourned and celebrated by a select few. Gone are the days when you have to be in a specific place, at a specific time, to take part in a specific moment. I wonder if some odd years from now, when folks look back on what is still, really, the dawning early days of the information age, if this isn’t one of the aspects that will be seen to have had the most widespread impact. The communities and bonds and public rituals that developed as a result of some tubes letting folks all over the world share some thoughts we each other. I hope so, because it’s some shit.

That’s, in part, why I’m annoyed with this documentary — in my mind, it focuses on an eccentric fuckstick (seriously, when his mother was on her deathbed, he sent her a goodbye video) who isn’t nearly as prescient as Ondi Timoner would have us believe. And she’d want us to believe it, of course, because Harris — and not Mark Zuckerberg, who founded Facebook, or Jack Dorsey, who founded Twitter — was the person she spent a decade filming. Timinoor had over 5,000 hours of footage — collected both herself and from Harris’ experiments — and it behooved her to try to market this documentary as something it isn’t, a culturally relevant statement about the illusory of intimacy we’ve developed on blogs and in Social Media. It may be fake intimacy for some people, and for some others it may be all about feeding their need for attention, but I’d argue that — for the majority of people who have given in to comment threads, and Facebook, and Twitter — it has created at least a level of actual intimacy. And it sure beats the hell out of using the phone (if you’re a phoneophile, raise your hand!)

The other thing that annoyed me about We Live in Public is that it’s yet another piece that focuses on one of those morons who made millions in the dot com era, and half expects us to feel sympathy for him when he lost it all. You know what: Fuck him. I was a bit player in that second-wave of Internet start-ups — through dumb luck and timing, a friend from high school and I managed to start a company that made $10 million in revenue by its third year. It never made it to its fourth year — in fact, this site (a side project of that company) is pretty much all that remains (sadly, all the money was spent hiring people that weren’t able to keep us ahead of the curve, so to speak, before corporate America and their billions usurped our small time advantage). We had a good run, though, and I’d never expect anyone to feel sorry for our bad business decisions (if you came here from GoFugYourself, however, you can thank that old, defunct company for all the advertising it paid for). And if we’d spent our money on orgies and drugs, I’d expect not sympathy, but swift kicks to the ass.

And that’s what Josh Harris deserves.

This review originally was published during the Boston International Film Festival. The movie opens in NYC tomorrow.









Touch of Evil | Glau on Dollhouse













Comments

Yeah, fuck that... you were once worth 10 million!!!

Posted by: George at April 28, 2009 3:08 PM

Given that I spent this weekend hanging out in person for the first time with a friend from Austria, a friend I never ever could have possibly met without the Internet, yes. Yes, the Internet does much more than just clutter an inbox with spam.

Also, yes, holy shit you were worth 10 mil?! Damn, awesome.

Posted by: twig at April 28, 2009 3:23 PM

I am a hardcore phoneophobe. I hate them. I hate them with a firey passion. There are about three people I'm comfortable talking on the phone to and two of them are related to me. On the other hand, holy god...I've been getting into some crazy shenanigans on facebook lately.

Posted by: s. pisaster at April 28, 2009 3:24 PM

Rowles was worth internet ten million? thats like i dunno 50 billion mad props lols???

Raises hand as a phoneophile. Hate the bastard why would i want to hear someone's whiny fucking voice trying to change my mind when i could just glory in the written word via text message or email.

Posted by: jim of the lower case at April 28, 2009 3:29 PM

Phones are horrible, and answering machines even worse.

Excellent review! The filmmaker sounds like a doorknob.

Posted by: frumpiefox at April 28, 2009 3:31 PM

How are answering machines worse? It means you can screen your calls, which means you don't have to use the phone.

Now automated phone systems, those things can fuck right off.

Posted by: twig at April 28, 2009 3:33 PM

Dustin - can I borrow $20?

Posted by: Kolby at April 28, 2009 3:33 PM

I don't mind telephone conversations, but I am really quite inept at leaving phone messages. I get all awkward and nervous and I always say much more than I need to. If I hear someone's phone heading to voicemail, I almost always just hang up and send a text.

Posted by: Kolby at April 28, 2009 3:35 PM

Hailing someone as an internet pioneer is like celebrating that euro-douche the "discovered" the fucking Pacific. It's shit that was bound to happen whether that weirdo scat freak came up with it or not.
Some other greasy nerd would have, eventually.

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at April 28, 2009 3:37 PM

They are worse because they are a record of my every stuttering, fumbling, nonsensing, awkward attempt at trying to convey a thought. A message that there is a chance I may some day have to listen to.

I will (and do) hang up and redial obsessively rather than leave a message. Caller ID is a dandy screening aid, and no dumb recordings.

Posted by: frumpiefox at April 28, 2009 3:40 PM

Um, what happened to

P
O
O
K
I
E

Posted by: Beyonce Rowles (L.O.V.E.) at April 28, 2009 3:50 PM

Yay, phoneophobes unite! s., my parents and my husband are the only folks I feel comfortable talking to on that horrid machine.

Oh man, Kolby, I'm a terrible message-leaver too--they're inevitably peppered with "Anyway"s and "um"s and are far more detailed than necessary. I hang up and loudly curse voice mail, which is almost invariably followed by a giggle from the neighbouring cubicle.

Posted by: meaux at April 28, 2009 3:52 PM

He assholed himself into an unprecedented lifetime banning.

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at April 28, 2009 3:52 PM

No Shit? I completely missed that. Take some time away from the computer to enjoy the SoCal sun and I miss something like that...

Posted by: Beyonce Rowles (L.O.V.E.) at April 28, 2009 4:11 PM

I once owned a company that made $10 million. But, yeah , we frittered it away on very bad ideas. And now I'm broke-ass like most folks.

/Internet hobo

Posted by: Dustin Rowles at April 28, 2009 4:17 PM

"filled with 100 Berkley grads"

First of all, it's Berkeley (three e's), and second, waaaay fewer of us are goddamn hippies and environmentalist vegan hipsters than you might think. Just saying.

Posted by: Vince Noir at April 28, 2009 4:30 PM

Simmer down, hippie.

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at April 28, 2009 4:33 PM

'Big Brother' and shows of those ilk make this question somewhat rhetorical but would you - for the exposure or a certain amount of cash - appear on a television program where every moment of your life is on public broadcast?
My answer? Sure. Why not? Almost everyone craves a bit of notoriety and most of us have an exhibitionist streak. We already reveal more of ourselves to each other online than we otherwise might so, given the fact that what you'd be doing is no different than standing in front of your webcam, why not?

Posted by: Spender at April 28, 2009 4:42 PM

Hey, I really did come here from GoFugYourself, so that dotcom was worth your money. That and whoever thought up your tagline.
Um I wasn't sure if I ought to mention it, but what did happen to P****e? Specifically; in which threads?

Posted by: ChrisD at April 28, 2009 5:00 PM

ChrisD: check out the ...Observe and Report thread, IIRC.

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at April 28, 2009 5:04 PM

Timinoor had over 5,000 hours of footage

That just makes me feel sad for everyone involved.

*raises hand*

If I could I would never use a telephone.

Fantastic review, Dustin.

Posted by: figgy at April 28, 2009 5:21 PM

What this Harris guy apparently doesn't get (and a lot of people don't get it) is that being able to share your every experience, thought and sensation doesn't mean you should. There are very few things more tiresome than someone who doesn't hold ANYTHING back. We celebrate (well, some people celebrate) these people in theory as brave and artistic and full of joie de vivre, but what they almost always are in fact are really rather pathetic attention whores, hoping to get from the rest of the world what they feel they didn't get enough of from their parents and friends. Most of everyone's life is really pretty mundane and uninteresting and to pretend differently is just denial.

I don't mind if people share their thoughts and opinions, as long as it's not EVERY goddam thought and opinion that comes into their heads. Also, it would be nice if more of it were somewhat grammatically correct and punctuated correctly (ie, not all lowercase with no commas or periods).

Posted by: Slash at April 28, 2009 6:24 PM

I completely agree, Slash. Hell, in an era where you can easily spellcheck your comments, there's no excuse.

I will not, however, ever defend Twitter. Twitter is a cancer upon our society. Even if it's Dustin, I don't want to hear every god damn thought you have throughout the day in less than 140 words. I am so looking forward to Twitter's death.

Posted by: George at April 28, 2009 6:41 PM

@Tod: Yah, I did brush my teeth THEN I drank the orange juice.

Posted by: Beyonce Rowles (L.O.V.E.) at April 28, 2009 7:02 PM

Sitting on toilet reading Pajiba.

about 1 minute ago from twitterfeed

Posted by: Beyonce Rowles (L.O.V.E.) at April 28, 2009 7:04 PM

Wiped.

about 2 minutes ago from twitterfeed

Posted by: Beyonce Rowles (L.O.V.E.) at April 28, 2009 7:08 PM

Ok, I just read through that Observe & Report thread. Having not seen the movie I have nothing to say but a lot of people definitely got all het up. But I didn't see Pookie saying anything worse than usual or really any different than some others, there was some heinous shit getting tossed around by a lot of people. Was there something behind the scenes that caused the ban? Or was it just an "enough is enough" situation. I'm honestly curious.

Posted by: TylerDFC at April 28, 2009 7:15 PM

(if you’re a phoneophile, raise your hand!)
---
Both hands way up. My idea of hell is a place where anyone can reach you, at any time.

So: I have no cell (Mrs. , has one and occasionally she makes me borrow it, and I have to relearn how to use it every time), and if I had my way we'd have no landline either (Mrs. , works at home and screens all my calls).

Jeebus, I'm paying Verizon and USCellular like *carry the 3 ...* $155 a month for shit I hate to even have in my house.

So don't nunna yinz fucking call me, ever, OK?

Except you, Kayanne.

Posted by: , (the commenter formerly known as bucdaddy) at April 28, 2009 8:43 PM

I believe studies are already underway that demonstrate the complete lack of social skills younger people have, because they spend all their time texting and pushing buttons in front of a computer screen, instead of interacting with actual people.

Don't get me wrong. The internet has good stuff in it. Like this site. I love the commentators here and the articles, but I also enjoying interacting with real, live human beings, in situations where I can examine their body language and tone of voice. Texting has always seemed to me to be just a faster form of the telegraph, without having to, dear God, TALK to people. If you don't like a person enough to listen to their voice, why would you want to send lame ass text messages?

Facebook and Twitter just baffle me, for one because I don't understand how anyone has TIME for it all. Who the fuck wants to document every mundane activity of their life day to day? Who the fuck wants to read about OTHER people's mundane lives? Who has time to drop what they're doing every hour to update their accounts? Because I'm thinking that if you do have that much time, you're not doing much that's worth updating.

It IS OK to keep some of your life private, you know. A little mystery is good.

Re: the Pajiban Voldemort--I too have read that Observe and Report comment thread, and You Know Who didn't seem any worse than his usual appalling, crass self. What's up?

Posted by: DeadBessie at April 29, 2009 9:10 AM

I will defend Facebook because it gives me an outlet to get through what is easily the worst job I have ever had (a part-time temp gig that I only suffer through because my real job won't bump me up to full-time hours). Without Facebook, I wouldn't be able to give moment-to-moment updates on the inane self-important blathering or epic halitosis of my boss (Bill Lumberg has nothing on this guy). Note to all you kids out there: Don't use Facebook to dump on a job you actually care about keeping, and don't dump on work unless you essentially limit your searchability to zero - learn from Dooce's mistakes!

For folks wondering about P@@kie, my understanding is that the really bad stuff got deleted from the thread, but the responses were left as-is. I could be wrong, though.

Posted by: Tammy at April 29, 2009 10:11 AM

... complete lack of social skills ... because they spend all their time ... pushing buttons in front of a computer screen, instead of interacting with actual people.

This sums up my coworkers pretty well, actually, but most of them are over 50. Of course, I do work in a library.

Some people look at the "every moment of your life is on public broadcast" type attention whoring and cringe violently--it's pretty much my version of hell. That's why the innernets is great--it allows for the paradox of a community of hermits.

Posted by: frumpiefox at April 29, 2009 11:26 AM


















Viral Hits

>> Pajiba Movie Posters

>> Pop Culture's 20 Greatest Dancing GIFs

>> Mindhole Blowers

>> The 100 Greatest Insults of All Time

>> The "Other" 100 Greatest Movie Quotes

>> The 100 Greatest Movie Threats of All Time

>> The Sean Bean Death Reel

>> Chicks Dig Beards: It's Science

>> The Coolest TV Show Title Sequences

>> The Most Rewatchable Movies

>> The Most Expensive Movies of All Time