web
counter
 

waterhorse2.jpg

Will Nature Make a Man of Me Yet?

The Water Horse: Legend of the Deep / Phillip Stephens

Film Reviews | December 25, 2007 | Comments (16)


There’s no dearth of films that chronicle a child’s emotional growth in conjunction to time spent with an animal (or alien, or robot, or otherwise being that doesn’t communicate/emote in the traditional andro manner); often the most poignant of relationships are those without the pretense and complexity found between two people. At the heart of every young boy or girl is often the desire to have a friend that no one else has, and to whom they themselves are paramount. An animal (and an imaginary animal especially) can make a kid feel like they’re the most important person in the world. There’s a lot of silly sentimentality attached to these kinds of films, at least, those that aren’t going for the heartrending realism of Sounder and those harrowing poor-boy-and-his-dog stories, but the best eschew the easy humor and sight gags in favor of a good subtext that reminds us of deeper elements at play. Mercifully, The Water Horse has plenty of the latter.

Set in 1940s wartime Scotland, where the German threat was predominantly naval, the setting gives a strange anxiety to the seeming safety of northern Britain. Young Angus MacMorrow (Alex Etel, from Millions) prowls the craggy hills and unbelievably cold-looking lochs, living in a stately manse that most of us only dream about inhabiting. The film is framed, somewhat inconsistently, as a tale told by an old man (Brian Cox) to a pair of dissonant Yank tourists (is there any other kind?) who’ve wandered into his pub. Cox will only appear a handful of times as a narrator; his role in the story isn’t revealed at first, though it’s pretty obvious, and he can offer little other than a predictable coda. One important point he makes at the onset, however, is that Angus is both terrified and compelled by water. An early scene has the boy sitting at loch’s edge, moodily imagining himself walking into the water and then plummeting. Angus is a curiously self-contained child, rendered well by Etel, with a kind of cautious sadness playing across his face. The vacuum in the boy’s life would appear to be the loss of his father, who’s off serving in the Royal Navy.

Angus stumbles across a mysterious egg one day which, of course, hatches into the eponymous creature, looking a lot like a slug crossed with a Plesiosaur. Angus is enthralled with the beast, though keeping it a secret from his mother (a fretful Emily Watson) is a chore. To further complicate matters, a battalion of gunners arrive in the village and billet themselves on the family’s land. Their commander, Capt. Hamilton (David Morrissey), suspects that the loch is vulnerable to a U-Boat invasion. Hamilton is a straight-laced character, but he possesses an insecurity as to his position in the war effort which makes him dangerous. The film presents the soldiers in a manner reminiscent of both The Iron Giant and typical creature-feature fare; though they’re on the side of the “good guys” in a narrative and (sort-of) historical sense, their very nature makes them unfailing agents of harm, especially where mythical monsters are to be found.

While Angus has his hands full tending to his dangerous new pet, a newcomer arrives, Lewis Mowbray (Ben Chaplin), a hired-hand with a mysterious past; a young man not already serving in the armed forces immediately appears suspicious. Mowbray becomes an ally to Angus, helping to conceal the creature, whom Angus has named Crusoe, who is meant to reference both Celtic legend and the real Loch Ness incident(s). Other than a few silly episodes involving near-misses and a Sergeant’s bulldog (all gags promised in the previews), the story does a fine job drawing parallels between the fantasy and the dramatic core it leavens; Angus’s fear of the water, and the immense void in his life fulfilled by this myth-come-true, have poignant metaphors behind them - a heartbreaking atmosphere of war and the repressed knowledge that a loved one isn’t coming home from it.

The Water Horse doesn’t always balance the light and the leaden properly, and the subplots involving Chaplin’s past and Morrissey as a villain don’t entirely gel, but these flaws aren’t enough to make the film a mere Free Nessie, coasting on pure kiddie adrenaline and sentiment. There are actually powerful moments in the story, though I wish there were more. At least this time the writing had a good heart, and one which should make the film a pleasant surprise to most.

Phillip Stephens is the lead critic for Pajiba. He lives in Fayetteville, AR, and has somehow worked in museums and archives without having battled Nazis or Freemasons.









Each Time You Like, Share, Tweet or Stumble a Pajiba Post, An Angel Does the Paul Rudd Dance



Alvin and the Chipmunks | Sweeney Todd: The Demon Barber of Fleet Street









Comments

and if you ever need self validation
just meet me in the alley by the railway station

its all over my face

Posted by: Bryan at December 29, 2007 10:30 AM

Guess I'm just dense this morning, as I have no idea what Bryan is on about.

In any case, this sounds like a decent enough family film. Perhaps I'll take my niece to see it.

Posted by: Daphne at December 29, 2007 11:08 AM

I've always been a huge fan of Emily Watson, she has that dirty girl quality to her. I bet she's a mean lay. If anyone knows her personally please tell her Pookie is available.

Posted by: Pookie at December 29, 2007 11:38 AM

Daphne--he's just a guy who appreciates a Smiths reference.

Posted by: kitty at December 29, 2007 11:55 AM

Oh, there was a movie reviewed? Could have fooled me, does the Pajakremlin get a free toaster with the software for this "site"?

In will not post my alcohol fueled rantings until I click on the review and ACTUALLY GET THE REVIEW, asshats.

Good day...... I SAID GOOD DAY.

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at December 29, 2007 2:37 PM

Chill BS, you can access the review by scrolling up from the comments, and you could be more polite about the broken link problem

Posted by: cockroach at December 29, 2007 2:51 PM

sssssssssswwWWWWWWWWWWWWIIIIIIIIIIssshhhhhssssFAP!

Swing and a miss C-man :)

Happy Holidays.

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at December 29, 2007 2:57 PM

I merely scrolled through the review, so I know this is wrong, but the Smiths reference and sighting the name Morrisey leads me to believe that Moz is the voice of the creepy water slug.

Which really would be kind of awesome.

Posted by: Gudrun at December 29, 2007 3:00 PM

Chill BS, you can access the review by scrolling up from the comments, and you could be more polite about the broken link problem

Posted by: cockroach at December 29, 2007 2:51 PM

_________________________________________________

I got this BSlim,


Cockroach! you don't come to pajiba and talk to a man like BSlim like that!

Posted by: Pookie at December 29, 2007 3:35 PM

The movie sounds more interesting then this review. But the back of a can of paint would meet those criteria.

And also, wtf does "though they're on the side of the "good guys" in a narrative and (sort-of) historical sense" mean?? Fighting against nazi Germany is just 'sort of' good??

Posted by: EricD at December 29, 2007 6:17 PM

They're "good guys" because they're fighting the Nazis but pose a threat to the little boy and his monster.

Jesus Pookie, BS isn't immune from being taken down a few pegs. No need to suck his proverbial.

Posted by: lex at December 29, 2007 8:04 PM

Lex you want to do business with me? I'll do business with you.

Posted by: Pookie at December 29, 2007 10:25 PM

Nice review, Phillip. I'm sorry you haven't yet had similar experiences to that of Dr. Jones.

Posted by: Kevin Longrie at December 30, 2007 12:36 AM

When I saw the previews for this movie it reminded me of The Secret of Roan Innish crossed with Loch Ness, that Ted Danson movie and a CGI Disney character.

The monster just looks so... cute.

Now I might just have to see it anyway.

Posted by: Scarlett at December 30, 2007 8:24 AM

Saw this over holiday break with my 6 year old daughter. We are not critics or WHATevah & so we loved it. My little gal knows a movie when she sees it & was captivated throughout - as opposed to Wallace & Gromit Werebunny crap which she asked to leave 1/2 way though claiming boredom. Me too.

Also, she told everyone afterwards that Water Horse it was a true story, and I guess that's what I liked about it too. Yes I know there are no monsters (or ARE there? da dun DAA), but like the reviewer mentioned, this movie isn't all about the unbelievable fantasy of monsters. It's more about Angus' story, I guess.

Anyhoo... Question for anyone who saw the movie: Did you think that Emily Watson was covering her gut waaaay too much? Note how most scenes have her carrying something or covering up with a wrap and so on and so forth?

Posted by: GinKirk at December 31, 2007 10:50 AM

This is the sort of movie that makes me wish I had kids, or at least that my brother would get on the reproducin'. It looks cute, and the scenery and knits look worth a look (then again, that, and la Tilda, were the only reasons I wanted to see Narnia, either), but I can't quite justify trying to drag a new boyfriend to it.

I'll probably catch it on Netflix.

Posted by: Kiku at January 3, 2008 10:53 AM