free counter with statistics WarGames: The Dead Code | Pajiba - Scathing Reviews for Bitchy People

War.Games.The.Dead.Code.Pic1.jpg

You’re Fucking Kidding Me, Right?

WarGames: The Dead Code / TK

Film Reviews | September 18, 2008 | Comments (36)


13 minutes and 32 seconds. That’s how long it took me to realize just how wretched this movie is. I suppose some of you may be surprised that it even took that long. Don’t get me wrong — I knew from the opening credits that I was in for a rough ride. But I figured, you know, it might be the fun kind of bad. Like “Saved By the Bell” reruns, or dead baby jokes.

I was wrong.

For those who haven’t discerned it from the title, WarGames: The Dead Code is a sequel to the beloved 1983 classic, WarGames, which starred a plucky, adorable Matthew Broderick and Ally Sheedy as teens who accidentally hacked into a government computer and, well, intrigue and hijinks ensued, bringing the world to the brink of World War III. Now you may be thinking, “Wait a second,TK, ol’ buddy, there’s a sequel? And why in the flying monkeyfuck are you reviewing it?” Well, first of all, I ain’t your goddamn buddy. Second of all, yes, there is sequel — it’s a direct to video affair, released in July of this year. Finally, I’m reviewing it because I like pain. Oh, sweet, sweet suffering. Because make no mistake — WarGames: The Dead Code hurts.

Anyway, I suppose I’ll talk about the plot, for whatever the hell that’s worth. Will Farmer (Matt Lanter — Disaster Movie, The Cutting Edge 3: Chasing the Dream) is a high school computer whiz who spends his time playing internet pranks that have supposedly gotten him into hot water with his school and his mom. We know this because it’s one of the first things he says, even though it’s never expounded upon and never comes up again after the first 15 minutes of the movie. I suppose it’s just there to show what a renegade Will is. Anyway, he’s got all the earmarks of your average movie high-school kid. He’s got a wisecracking buddy, Dennis (Nicholas Wright — Superstorm, Swamp Devil), who is easily the most irritating character invented in the last five years. Seriously, within five minutes, I wanted to bite his eyes out. He’s got a girl he’s crushing on, Annie (Amanda Walsh — an episode of “Veronica Mars,” a bunch of other crap). Of course, he demonstrates his affection for her by cyberstalking her and trying to hack into her life via the internet, which isn’t at all creepy or demented. Instead, when she catches him stalking her she finds it charming and leaves him cutesy messages persuading him to go on a chess club trip to Montreal so they can hang out. Just in case anyone missed the bit I buried in that sentence, let me reiterate: A chess club trip to Montreal. God, I fucking hate this movie. Are writers so bereft of originality that we have to just start coming up with goofy, arbitrary ideas to get people to travel? Of course, of fucking course, chess will come into play later in the movie and help save the day.

Ever watch an entire movie while gritting your teeth yet falling asleep at the same time? I swear to God, I woke up this morning with TMJ.

Where was I? Right, the plot. Apparently, the Department of Homeland Security, in between shutting down movie websites and searching me five fucking times every time I travel, has created a new, eviler supercomputer called RIPLEY to replace the original’s W.O.P.R./Joshua computer from WarGames. Don’t ask what RIPLEY stands for, because either they never say it, or I blacked out during that moment. It’s a toss-up, really. Now here’s the kicker. RIPLEY inserts herself (yes, it’s voiced by a female this time) into the internet as a gambling website, where players bet money on how many people they can kill using things like, in another sad nod to the original, Global Thermonuclear Warfare, and bioweapons, and something called “The Dead Code,” a moniker that is totally and completely irrelevant and has no bearing on the film’s title or the events that take place. Somehow, RIPLEY traces the players and… um… digs into their online information… and… well… figures out which ones are terrorists. Because terrorists … play online gambling games? About biowarfare?

You know how sometimes when you’re eating, you accidentally bite the inside of your cheek? Well, I just somehow bit my own brain. I’m going to need a moment.

So. Because Will’s mom works at a chemical plant, and because he stole some money one time, and because the computer he used belongs to his next-door neighbor, and that neighbor is from Syria, RIPLEY assumes that Will is a terrorist. Stop laughing, you assholes. I’m serious. That’s how it happens! Of course, all of the various nefarious government employees and tech geeks that work for DHS and the department of scary-ass supercomputers all blindly agree that a 17 year-old suburban kid obviously is a terrorist, and they set out to track him down. In Montreal. Because, you know, he’s there for the chess trip. Also? I want to die.

I can’t believe I’ve spent this much time summarizing the plot of this case of cinematic gonorrhea. Next thing we know, Will and Annie are on the run through Montreal trying to escape the black hats, as RIPLEY taps into everything from cell phones to the security cameras at a 7/11 (because obviously those are hooked up to the internet, and she controls the internet) to track them down. Eventually they run into Professor Stephen Falken (a recurring character from the original but played by a different actor) who has also been tracking them, and then some shit blows up, they get captured and somehow end up in Washington D.C., where RIPLEY is now trying to kill half of Philadelphia. Will, Annie, and Dr. Falken have to save the day by getting the original Joshua program and RIPLEY to play “Suicide Chess.” Somehow that works, RIPLEY backs down and everyone hugs. I, meanwhile, am considering kneeling down and begging my DVD player for forgiveness.

Did that make sense to everyone? Because I’ll be honest — not only is the movie shamelessly derivative, poorly directed and flat-out boring, it’s also so utterly discombobulated that trying to make sense of the plot will literally make you woozy. It is complete and total nonsense. In an effort to try to make it seem complex and clever, writers Rob Kerchner (responsible for instant classics like Bloodfist V: Human Target and Casper Meets Wendy) and Randall Badat (Cutting Edge 3: Chasing the Dream — who thought that would be referenced twice today?) instead came up with a series of concepts that have no grounding in reality at all. Once again, Hollywood writers display a breathtaking ignorance of how computers and the internet actually work, instead trying to force their deranged, blockheaded ideas into some semblance of a story. Well, it’s a story that sucks relentlessly and without mercy — and not in the good way. Instead, it’s needlessly complicated, with transitions and leaps in logic that are nothing less than an intellectual cockpunch to the viewers.

The director is equally guilty, mind you. Stuart Gillard (responsible for directing a few episodes of “Charmed” and… holy fucking shit, Cutting Edge 3: Chasing the Dream — hand to God) directs the film with such epic hamfistedness that it’s almost dazzling. He, the writers and the producers are clearly fans of the Scott brothers — the computer is named RIPLEY (and in one moment, a character actually says, “Like in Alien”), and they have obviously borrowed the worst aspects of Tony Scott’s directorial style — hyperkinetic, frenzied, headache inducing editing, those annoying fast-then slow-then fast again shots, super zooms from far above to ground level… all of those tricks that hack directors think makes them look skilled, but instead just look like a live-action version of “Battling Seizure Robots.” Not to mention the innumerable scenes that are just idiotic — Will and Annie are arrested on top of a mountain in Montreal. They open a door, and somehow end up in a bunker in Washington DC? There’s a scene of the two of them literally outrunning a car. They are running in a straight line. The car is not dodging anything, yet it can’t catch them? The assjackery in this film is absolute, I tell you.

On the bright side, the acting is actually quite decent. HA! Suckers. That’s a bald-faced fucking lie. The acting is worse than my fourth-grade play. There’s only one actor I’ve even heard of — Colm Feore. The thing is, I actually like Feore, so I was at first disappointed, until I read his iMDB resume and… whew. Dude is not what you’d call “selective.” Suffice it to say that his performance alternates between resoundingly mediocre and completely overwrought. He somehow manages to deliver lines like, “RIPLEY operates at 98.6% efficiency — the temperature of human blood.” Incidentally, I believe that was the line delivered at the 13:32 mark. His is also easily the best performance in the film, unfortunately. The two protagonists are awful — simpering caricatures who couldn’t convey a real human expression if you pointed a gun at their well-coiffed heads. That’s all I’m going to tell you, for fear that my eyes start vomiting again.

I was a little concerned when, about halfway through the movie, I turned to my cat and asked him, “Seriously Little Man, what the hell is going on? I mean, are you following this at all?” This tells you two things: that WarGames: The Dead Code makes absolutely no sense, and that it will drive you completely insane. It’s a movie that literally fails in every way a movie can fail — direction, acting, writing, editing, music, set design, production, everything. I understand that it’s a DTV release, and that I shouldn’t get so worked up about it. But there are entertaining DTV releases out there… not good, per se, but at least amusing. WarGames: The Dead Code isn’t amusing. It’s not entertaining. It was worse than I thought it would be, and I had some pretty damn low expectations.

TK can be found wandering aimlessly through suburban Massachusetts, wondering how the hell he got there while yelling at the kids on his lawn. You can find him raising the dead in preparation for world domination at Uncooked Meat.


New Moon by Stephenie Meyer | I Can Haz Cheezburger Blog Review



Comments

I had no idea this sequel existed. In other news, I have now completely lost the will to live.

Posted by: docsmartypants at September 18, 2008 1:54 PM

When you talk about DTV, it makes me think of the fake dance show in Girls Just Want to Have Fun.

...what? Why are you looking at me like that?

Posted by: Sarina at September 18, 2008 2:07 PM

TK...?

Are you sure? Did you...really...bite your own brain?

Are your hordes turning on you?

Was that shuffling?

...

Does it hurt?

Posted by: Sean at September 18, 2008 2:09 PM

The title of this article? Exactly what I said when my housemate told me of the existence of this film. Naturally, because his personal 'quality of film to amount of enjoyment gleaned from it' ratio works in polar opposite to normal, sane people's, he's downloaded it via BitTorrent. He's just waiting for the right set of circumstances (me being too drunk and lethargic to put up more than token resistance to the idea of such an abomination flickering across my eyeballs) to arise before inflicting this steaming shit-fest on me.

Posted by: Dill The Devil at September 18, 2008 2:10 PM

TK, Thank you for "vomiting from the eyes"...I will be stealing that one.

Posted by: jamiepants at September 18, 2008 2:11 PM

Hold on one goddamed second - lemme get this straight - so what you're saying TK, is that you didn't like it? Do you have any reasons why?

Posted by: Skittimus Maximus at September 18, 2008 2:17 PM

Have you ever sniffed a carton of milk to see if it has gone bad, and been confronted with a brain curdling stench. Then, sniffed it agian, just to make sure it was really that bad? Then sought a second opinion?

That is sort of what this review felt like. Sharing the pain.

Posted by: Lindsey at September 18, 2008 2:29 PM

All I can think of is "DEATH BED: THE BED THAT EATS PEOPLE!"

Which actually sounds BETTER than this release.

Posted by: Tammy at September 18, 2008 2:37 PM

They lost me at the "RIPLEY walks tall and carries a very big stick" line. It's walk softly you morons.

Posted by: s. pisaster at September 18, 2008 2:44 PM

I think...I think my brain just imploded. There's definitely blood running from my ears and nose.

I certainly hope that I was in the dead half of Philadelphia.

Posted by: Nicole at September 18, 2008 2:49 PM

Oh TK, ol' bu... uh pal, chum, amigo, homie, compadre, kemo sabe, brother from another mother, I just have four questions:

Why do you do these things to yourself?

Why did you make your cat watch this? (Seriously, my cat once shit in my bed and I'm almost certain it was because I left him alone with the TV on during a Flavor of Love marathon)

Someone made The Cutting Edge 2?

When will you review The Cutting Edge III? I mean, you're already on a roll.

Posted by: jM at September 18, 2008 2:54 PM

I hate to say this after all you've been through, but Ridley Scott directed Aliens.

Nope. James Cameron = Aliens. Ridely Scott (the superior Scott brother) = Alien. -TK

Posted by: phquaryn at September 18, 2008 3:14 PM

Good point. However, "War Games" came out in 1983.

This doesn't excuse a sequel being made though. Wasn't "Project X" enough of a spiritual sequel?

Posted by: Jay at September 18, 2008 4:57 PM

Jay, you SHUT YOUR MOUTH about Project X! There are chimps! And they use flight simulators! And one of them is named Goliath! And he smokes!

...and then he gets irradiated.

Sweet Jesus, that movie is such a gigantic, steaming pile of shit. It's one of the worst things I've ever seen. I love it sooooo much.

Posted by: Sarina at September 18, 2008 5:09 PM

Colm Feore is Canadian. We'll take whatever crappy roles your American money can buy on our soil.

Posted by: Nancy at September 18, 2008 5:26 PM

Oooh, you are correct, TK. As pennance, I will watch this movie.

Posted by: phquaryn at September 18, 2008 5:27 PM

It took you 13 minutes and 32 seconds, to realize this sucks?

A properly functioning Pajiborg would've realized that at the second he/she read the words "War Games: The..

Terminate yourself immediately.

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at September 18, 2008 6:58 PM

And now I have an inexplicable desire to see Cutting Edge 3: Chasing the Dream. TOE PICK!

Posted by: louveciennes at September 18, 2008 7:21 PM

Truly, truly sad. I feel for you, TK. I really do. Nobody should have...to..*snerk*...watch this...

BWAHAHAHAHAHAAAAA!!!!!!

I am sorry. i can't do it. You pretty much deserve this, TK.

Tell me one thing: should I get this along with Nightbreed? My limited exposure to films is quite lacking, and you make it sound so good....

Posted by: Social Justice Crusader Recoil Zoo Palin at September 18, 2008 8:03 PM

I twice mis-read "The Dead Code" as "The David Code" - probably because my brain was screaming denial so loudly over the War Games bit. But hey, it could totally be a sequel to the DaVinci Code only with Michelangelo instead of DaVinci. And the code could all be about mathematical properties of the genitalia depicted in classical sculpture. And the protagonist could have really bad hair (for continuity) and go around Italy looking terribly serious while he carefully measured the dicks on various renaissance statues. And then his sexy assistant could realize that the real message is in the genetically inherited holy sacred dick which just happens to belong to the protagonist. [protagonist can be played by any actor from the Pajiba short list of totally fuckable men]

Sometimes an extended personal fantasy is the only response - even you're only reading the review.

Posted by: Megan at September 18, 2008 8:17 PM

Did you time it so the review would take 13 minutes and 32 seconds to read? I bailed at about the :08 mark, which is about right for a terrible movie.

Posted by: bucdaddy at September 18, 2008 8:23 PM

Whoa! While that post was processing I just saw this: "... the Pajiba short list of totally fuckable men."

Um ... how short is that short list?

(And if the answer is "one shorter than you think it is, bucdaddy," then I'm going to have to cry.)

Posted by: bucdaddy at September 18, 2008 8:26 PM

TK, is your cat called "Seriously Little Man" or "Little Man"?

He's fallen into a grammatical grey zone. Not that I could give a rat's arse, but I'm intrigued about the possible rationale belying either option. The suspense is killing me.

Posted by: Squrrox at September 18, 2008 8:52 PM

Just "Little Man." I sometimes try too hard to avoid overusing commas...

Posted by: Luger Otter Palin aka TK at September 18, 2008 8:54 PM

Blast!

If only it were the former, which sounds something one of those uber-literal superhero names of the '40s and '50s. Like Seriously Little (But Anthropologically Proportional) Man.

Posted by: Squrrox at September 18, 2008 9:30 PM

TK,

To be honest with you, I always thought you were severely lacking in commas, and would, indeed, never have pointed it out myself, if not for your honest, yet disappointing, confession.

Commas, semi-colons, italics, bold, exclamation! / Question Mark? points...(triple dots)

I'm of the opinion that none of the above can ever be overused: so free yourself, my Brother, let the cadence flow, as it may, and damn the opinions of others.

That is, to say, I only want, and/or need, to reinforce that, indeed, there is no such excuse to, well, not only overuse commas, where literary license demands, but, also, and without extraneous compunction, to properly, and literally, express, and acknowledge, your most salient, concise point, vis a vis the overusage of commas, in any extenuating event, obviously ever-present in this comment alone, an over-long, bloating treatise in and of itself, as I'm sure you, and all the rest of you, are now very well aware, via an inexcusably long, comma-ridden communication, without an ending punctuation at hand, which obviously leads nowhere near the subject being discussed, and, even if it did, would be mostly anti-climactic, and insanely boring, as I no doubt you, all of you, feel right now about this particular, singular, comma-ridden diatribe, even now.

And not only that,

Posted by: CommaMan at September 18, 2008 9:36 PM

This is the best review in the history of mankind.

Posted by: Chez at September 18, 2008 10:00 PM

Well, first of all, I ain't your goddamn buddy

Oh yeah? Well I ain't your buddy, guy.

Posted by: Goldie at September 19, 2008 12:15 AM

Yeah? Well, I ain't your guy, fwiend.

Posted by: James at September 19, 2008 6:35 AM

"RIPLEY operates at 98.6% efficiency -- the temperature of human blood."

Fuck.

Me.

Rhonda.

Posted by: Godsbane at September 19, 2008 11:26 AM

Welcome to the hot club[___"interracialchatting.com"___]whcih is a dating service for whites and blacks to find their interracial love.register for free,you can find your love there,there has been more than 3000 singles online and many black and white single girls or guys waitting for you.

Posted by: alia at September 19, 2008 11:40 AM

I AIN'T YOUR FWIEND, BUDDY!

Posted by: Goldie at September 19, 2008 11:57 PM

"A chess club trip to Montreal"

What, they didn't make it to the grammar rodeo?

Posted by: some Guy at September 20, 2008 11:54 AM

Now I'm really curious about Cutting Edge 3: Chasing the Dream - that is one hell of a coincidence.

Also, this made me wonder if it's a safe bet to assume any movie that has a colon in it is going to suck in that extra-special brain-melting way (the only exception I can think of right now is the LOTR trilogy, and that's because it was using book subtitles)

Also, I'm glad that other people automatically think of south park references like I do. Usually when I start in with that stuff IRL people just give me funny looks.

Posted by: Panda at September 20, 2008 1:48 PM

Oh man, Panda, me too. We have so much in common. You're so funny.

You have really shiny hair... Can I smell it?

Posted by: jM at September 20, 2008 3:27 PM

I wonder if there's a point in expounding how bad this movie is. Maybe just write one sentence and say it's bad instead of making us read the review? I know... (sigh) I know you want us to suffer to...but is it really worth all the pain? I mean, really...

Posted by: ph at September 20, 2008 5:27 PM