free counter with statistics Waitress | Pajiba - Scathing Reviews for Bitchy People

nathan_fillion5.jpg

I’m So Pathetically in Love with this Film Pie

Waitress / Dustin Rowles

Film Reviews | May 3, 2007 | Comments (54)


I’m not even sure where to begin here. How about this: Waitress stars the stunningly beautiful but strangely-not-hot Keri Russell as Jenna Hunterson, a spirited waitress who works at Joe’s Pie Shop, a small-town diner in the South. Jenna has inherited her mother’s knack for the art of pie-making, and each day she whips up a new pie and names it after whatever mood she is in (don’t ask me why, but the pies looks positively sumptuous — the cinematographer here does for pastry what Elliot Davis’ cinematography did for Detroit in Out of Sight; it’s kind of unreal). Her two co-workers at Joe’s are Becky (Cheryl Hines), the sassmouth Flo of the establishment, and Dawn (Adrienne Shelly), a geeky horn-rimmed-glasses-wearer who looks like an ideal candidate for a She’s All That makeover.

Jenna is trapped in a marriage with Earl, (Jeremy Sisto) quite possibly the worst husband ever to appear in a magic-realist comedy (“I hate my husband pie”). He’s completely unredeemable: neurotic, controlling, insanely jealous, and a complete idiot to boot (he’s a bumpkinfied version of Sisto’s “Six Feet Under” character off his meds). Jenna has been saving up money to escape her dead-end life with Earl when she gets drunk one night and accidentally allows her husband to have sex with her, resulting in an unwanted pregnancy (“I don’t want Earl’s baby pie”) that she’s really not happy about (“baby screaming its head off in the middle of the night and ruining my life pie”). The pregnancy leads her to the new, awkwardly nervous small-town OB-GYN, Dr. Pomatter (Nathon Fillion, at his absolute best), whom she falls in love with (“I can’t have no affair because it’s wrong and I don’t want Earl to kill me pie … hold the banana.”) Rounding out the cast is Joe (Andy Griffith), the diner’s irascible old soul who pries into Jenna’s personal affairs.

And that’s the premise — Jenna is trapped in an untenable situation, in love with one man, terrified of another, and very pregnant with an unborn child she already resents; Becky is caught up in an affair with an unknown married man; and Dawn is involved in a relationship with someone who initially repulses her. But that really does nothing to get to the heart of this movie — it has a plot, but it’s not plot-driven. It’s driven by a fairy-tale whimsy. And this infectious floaty feeling that seeps into you while watching Waitress, a light emotion that hovers in the pit of your stomach and gently rises until the suffocating triangle of Jenna’s life traps it in your chest. And then the finale releases it, like a popped cork, unleashing every emotion within you like … like … waking up and realizing, for the first time in ages, that there is someone lying next to you in bed, lit by the sun seeping through the shades — groggy and halitosic, but striking nonetheless.

I’ve given in to hyperbole, of course. But the feeling is not that dissimilar from what I described: a warm, fuzzy, magical, epiphanic feeling made even more poignant when you realize that Adrienne Shelly — who not only wrote and directed the film but also plays Dawn, a character you can see and sense and watch and enjoy — died tragically — was murdered brutally, in fact — only months before Waitress debuted at Sundance.

Which is not to say that Waitress doesn’t have its faults — it’s jarring, at first. Hard to get a feel for the tone — it’s like Brick in a way. Until you adjust to what’s going on and realize that the acting isn’t bad, it’s intentionally loopy and over-the-top, you may think you’re watching a weird, screwball-sitcom parody with the brand of whiplash poignancy that “Scrubs” has popularized. But the actors sell it — Kerri Russell’s earthiness grounds it, Nathan Fillion’s charming nervousness endears you to it, and Andy Griffith’s down-home folksiness and soft heart completely freakin’ delivers it home. It’s just … well … the whole thing … it’s just so goddamn moving. It’s decent film. A humble film. And there’s no pretension; there’s no forced quirk, no nods at the camera, no “Look-at-me! I’m sweet and charming and cute!” vibe. It’s just modest and heartfelt and good.

And I swear I’m not high right now.

Listen, Waitress isn’t for everyone. If you don’t care for romantic comedies, it’s probably not going to work for you — and if it doesn’t, you’ll probably loathe it (there isn’t a lot of potential for the middle ground with Shelly’s style). The plot is not terribly original. But the tone and feel is like nothing I’ve ever seen before on film. And if you allow yourself to give into it, to get swept up by its charm, you’ll walk out with an achy heart and a smile that may not fade for days.

Dustin Rowles is the publisher of Pajiba. He lives with his wife in Ithaca, New York. You may email him, or leave a comment below.


Got a Box Full of Pajibas, Think You Might Like to Read | Pajibatainment Tonight



Comments

"I-can't-wait-to-see-this-movie" comment

Posted by: MariSafari at May 3, 2007 2:47 PM

Ooooh.. That sounds great! I can't wait to see it!

Posted by: Amy at May 3, 2007 2:48 PM

This seems like such an amazing, sweet film. I really hope that it begets the success that it obviously deserves, even just for breaking the mould of the conventional.

Posted by: nina at May 3, 2007 2:52 PM

I was so looking forward to your review on this one. I've come to deeply respect Pajiba's opinion on movies since it so deeply mirrors my own. You guys were dead on about In the Land of Women, among others.

I saw a preview for Waitress months ago, and it struck me as being a lovely looking attempt to correct the saccharine ills of Simply Irresistable, that terrible yet somehow endearing "Sarah Michelle Gellar goes to the movies!" flick of the mid-90s. I thrills me to no end to know that Waitress surpasses all my expectations.

And yay for Nathan Fillion!

Posted by: Ashley MacLennan at May 3, 2007 2:55 PM

I don't know what to say. I could smell the good review coming once I saw the image with Nathan "leave me alone, Chez" Fillion.....but MAN. I think you may have actually gotten Keri Russell pregnant through this review, Dustin.

I'll think I'll keep this one in my back pocket until my girlfriend forces me to go see a romantic comedy of her choice.

Posted by: Manny at May 3, 2007 3:03 PM

The trailer for this movie really didn't interest me, but your review has convinced me to give it a shot. I'll be sure to check it out next time I'm in the mood for something thoughtful and low-key.

Posted by: Mentalepsy at May 3, 2007 3:27 PM

I can't wait till it comes to my local art house theater pie!

Or

Seeing it because Dustin told me is was good and cause Adrianne Shelly deserves my money from the grave pie!

Posted by: Ben at May 3, 2007 3:35 PM

I'd heard something about this one at sundance and hoped it would get a wider screening...
I typically respect Pajiba's opinion (respect = agree), and this was no exception. Got a pass to see this last Thursday and it was FAN TASTIC.
Literally walked out and deemed it a top 10 of all time (there, I said it). Something about the way the ending is handled and a certain scene in which Keri Russell tears up ending a relationship... moving indeed.
If youre on the fence- GO SEE IT.

Posted by: Christy at May 3, 2007 3:39 PM

Is this "Like Water for Chocolate" in the southern US?

By the way--my 17 year old brother confessed that he wants to see In the Land of Women. I told him that Pajiba said it was really a guy flick. Then he made fun of me for referring to Pajiba as if it were a person.

Posted by: anikitty at May 3, 2007 3:41 PM

keri russell is pretty darn hot!

Posted by: harmon at May 3, 2007 4:01 PM

Following the weekly evisceration of deserving box office targets, we get an unapologetic embrace of guns, explosions and mindless adrenaline (the Top 15 Action Flicks) juxtaposed with a glowing review of what looks like a quiet, earthy indie film.

It's refreshing to see reviewers who can appreciate a broad range of movies on their respective merits, while still possessing the taste, honesty and critical faculties to review them thoroughly and fairly. Too many critics are enamored of "critic's movies" exclusively and automatically.

I don't always agree with Pajiba's reviews, of course, but I've always been impressed with the peculiar sort of maverick integrity displayed here.

Posted by: Mentalepsy at May 3, 2007 4:14 PM

I really can't wait to see this movie. I've had a girl crush on Keri Russell since forever, and I can tell you Dustin, she can look pretty hot too.

Posted by: Gaby at May 3, 2007 4:25 PM

But antikitty, Pajiba is LIKE a real person, and that's enough to deserve being referred to as one. Smart, witty, wide-ranging tastes in movies, books, and music, open to new possibilities in all areas...the list is endless, and I don't want Pajiba to get a big head.

I think I want to marry Pajiba.

Posted by: JKo at May 3, 2007 4:30 PM

I love pie.

Posted by: Mrs.Kravitz at May 3, 2007 4:39 PM

Despite this having my oft-raged-against "cute cool girl stuck with complete asshole" plot element, which I can't stand, and despite this looking like a completely saccharine rom-com, and despite the presence of Keri Russell (aka Felicity aka Flacidity) in it...

... Fuck if I can't wait to see it. Goddamnit. Nobody mention this to the boys at the bar down the street.

And is it me or has there been a lot of Pajiba-marriage talk recently? Ah, Pajiba, bringing strangers together. Albeit weirdly.

Posted by: TK at May 3, 2007 4:42 PM

Hell, if such a glowing review like this can make me feel so good, then the film really might kill me with wonderfulness! I've been in a magical-realist mood lately, and with this, Stardust and Penelope coming out at the end of summer, I'm going to be a very satisfied girl.

Posted by: annie at May 3, 2007 5:00 PM

'ok, I'm totally sold on seeing this movie' pie!

Is that enough whimsical pie names for now? ;-)

It sounds great, and any production which makes good use of the so-talented-but-unlucky-with-projects Fillion gets my money. Except I bet it won't be on at my local multiplex... *sigh*
Adding to DVD wish list....

Posted by: tarn at May 3, 2007 5:03 PM

"I've been in a magical-realist mood lately, and with this, Stardust and Penelope coming out at the end of summer, I'm going to be a very satisfied girl."

Someone else is looking forward to Penelope?

When I went to see Bridge to Terabithia in February, the opening trailers were made up mostly of the typical kiddie drek (including Are We Done Yet), but Penelope stood out to me as having the potential to be sweet, thoughtful, and respectful of the audience. As such, I'm at least tentatively interested in seeing it. Granted, it could go the other way as well, but I do have hopes for it.

I have kind of a soft spot for smart kid's movies. So many of the movies that are marketed towards children and young adults are embarrassingly condescending, obsessed with gross-out humor, or just plain stupid. I love it when someone manages to put out a film that young people can understand, relate to, and enjoy - while still being intelligent, respectful and well-written. These are the real "family" films, in my opinion.

Posted by: Mentalepsy at May 3, 2007 5:18 PM

So any idea when this opens more widely than just for the cool kids in NY and LA? i.e. when am I going to be able to see it here in Albuquerque?

Posted by: Alarmjaguar at May 3, 2007 5:37 PM

I saw the movie "Waitress" at Sundance, and I swear I still have not wiped the smile off my face. Keri Russell is the most darling person that ever lived!

Posted by: Jill at May 3, 2007 6:06 PM

I remember hearing about Adrienne Shelly in that "Big Girls Don't Cry...They get Even" movie, years ago, with Hilary Wolf. It's really sad what happened to her.

Doubtful that I'll see the film nearby, but I like KR, so I'll look for it.

Posted by: Brie at May 3, 2007 6:06 PM

I cannot wait to see it. I love Adrienne Shelly, and I love the rest of the cast, especially Nathan Fillion.

Posted by: Loob at May 3, 2007 7:42 PM

I don't know, Dustin... since the infamous "there is no better third-date film than 'Almost Famous'" post, I take all your lovely Pajiba-ness with a big grain of salt. I love Nathan Fillion. I want to give this film a chance. But I keep hearing "Tiny Dancer" in the back of my mind, and recalling a scene that made me laugh out loud in the worst way. Tell me it's better than that. Much, much better. Help me believe again.

Posted by: mk at May 3, 2007 9:28 PM

Anyone know of an Australia release date???

Posted by: SC at May 3, 2007 11:39 PM

MK - how can you not love "Almost Famous?" That makes me sad.
BTW if you can find it Dave Grohl did a funny version of Tiny Dancer for a tv show that just cracked me up!

Posted by: Trixie at May 4, 2007 2:35 AM

I've been eagerly anticipating this movie since I heard about it bein in production.

I love Shelly, and whole-heartedly recommend her directorial debut, Sudden Manhatten, which was released on DVD last year, but is probably pretty hard to find.

She was also great in Trust, and to a lesser extent, The Unbelievable Truth. That is, if you can stand Hal Hartley's work. As Dustin said of Shelly's style, it's a love it or hate it thing.

Posted by: C at May 4, 2007 4:05 AM

A friend of mine sat me down and forced me to watch the trailer for this movie a while ago. And damn it if I haven't been on the edge of my seat waiting for it ever since. I'm so glad it got a good review, Pajiba never fails me.

Posted by: Alex the Odd at May 4, 2007 7:14 AM

A technicality, but you a woman is pregnant with a fetus, not an "unborn child." It's kind of like saying planting ungrown flowers instead of seeds.

Posted by: me at May 4, 2007 7:43 AM

If I do see this--and despite glowing praise, I remain a little leery--it will be with one major proviso:

I'll need a big slice of homemade pie on a plate at my elbow, because I have a frightening pastry weakness and such repeated, lucious representation will instantly translate into GET IN MA BELLY!

pie.

Posted by: Ranylt at May 4, 2007 8:14 AM

"I work in a pie factory and I despise my job, yet I've been dying to see this movie for months" pie.

Sigh. Fillion-love.

Posted by: Mara at May 4, 2007 8:31 AM

Me- I think you left a few words out of your post up there.

And I have severe woman love for Keri Russell. She is such a timeless, classic, "girly" beauty, that she can really do no wrong in my book. And calling her "hot" seems like a put down...she's miles above that adjective.

Posted by: Helcat at May 4, 2007 9:48 AM

How about some "Why-the-hell-isn't-this-movie-showing-on-more-than-4-screens-pie"??

I haven't seen Pajiba rhapsodize about a film so much in a long time, and yet I can't see it because its not playing anywhere near me. What genius at FOX Searchlight decided that was a good idea? Oh I forgot. Fillion. I wonder if FOX some elaborate plot to destroy poor adorable Nathan Fillion.

Posted by: MG at May 4, 2007 10:53 AM

Good god, I thought from that little picture that this movie stars Chris O'Donnell and you are out of your mind... or high. Thanks for the review, sounds great!

Posted by: jana at May 4, 2007 12:06 PM

MK and Trixie: I, too, hated "Almost Famous." That said, this movie looks lovely.

Posted by: Samantha T at May 4, 2007 12:10 PM

I've just spent the past fifteen minutes searching online, trying to find out when it goes "wide," and I can't find ANYTHING. The Fox Searchlight page for the movie has a spot where you're supposed to enter your zip code to find showtimes in your area--but it's not a link to anything.

Maybe they haven't decided yet when to let us Flyover People get a peek at it.

Posted by: Jerce at May 4, 2007 12:27 PM

I've been dying to see this movie since you guys reviewed it in your Sundance posts a while back. Since seeing the trailer numerous times and reading this fantastic review, I'm royally pissed that it's not playing in any theatres in my area.

I echo the Nathan Fillion love. Hot damn we make some good-looking boys up here in Canada!

Posted by: Mary at May 4, 2007 12:42 PM

This needs to come out somewhere in or near Boston really really really soon.

Posted by: Kevin at May 4, 2007 1:00 PM

I finally found something--free screenings! Whee!

http://waitressmovie.net/?p=48

Posted by: Jerce at May 4, 2007 1:47 PM

you ROCK, Jerce!

Posted by: TK at May 4, 2007 2:33 PM

C'mon, screening Somewhere in DC That Isn't Bethesda!

Posted by: Claire at May 4, 2007 2:50 PM

Excellent, Jerce you rule! I have to wait a couple weeks, but I get to see it, and for free!

Posted by: MG at May 4, 2007 3:43 PM

Don't forget to RSVP so they'll let you in, all you lucky bastards...There's a screening "near" where I live, but it's just too damn hard to get to. I'm going to have to wait--and pay--with the hoi polloi.

Posted by: Jerce at May 4, 2007 4:01 PM

Apparently, this movie is not playing anywhere in my zip code. Guess I'll have to wait for a rental.

Man, I'm bored.

Posted by: Mentalepsy at May 4, 2007 8:09 PM

"I'm making my boyfriend take me to see this first before he drags me to Spiderman 3 pie"

Posted by: joann marie at May 5, 2007 6:29 PM

Woot, Jerce, you rock! Two screenings in Albuquerque for me to choose from...I could even go twice!

Posted by: Alarmjaguar at May 6, 2007 7:29 PM

If I do see this--and despite glowing praise, I remain a little leery

Right there with you, Ranylt. I haven't been into rom coms for a while now, and this sounds a tad too precious. I may rent it, though, if the mood strikes. Nah....who am I kidding? Not even the normally unquenchable desire for a Fillionic fix compels me to watch this. BTW, you never fell to make me laugh, Ranylt. I can't get the Austin Powers character out of my head now.

Posted by: Daphne at May 6, 2007 11:05 PM

in reply to a prior comment,

A fetus is not a seed. It is a developing child. Which is why it is possible to have the child leave the womb before the standard delivery time, and survive with the help of medical technology until it gains strength. It is not a peapod creature that magically changes into a viable human after leaving the birth canal.

If you want to keep it legal for women to have their unborn children killed, that's your perogative. But don't redefine reality to ease moral guilt by calling a child a seed.

Posted by: stand up for morals at May 7, 2007 1:07 PM

If you want to keep it legal for women to have their unborn children killed, that's your perogative. But don't redefine reality to ease moral guilt by calling a child a seed.

Jesus shit.

Look, I respect your right to an opinion, and I respect your right to voice that opinion. What you've done here, however, is nothing more than inflammatory, intellectually dishonest exhibitionism.

You seized upon an innocuous nitpick that was tangentially related (at best) to your apparent pet topic, and used it as an opportunity to put loaded and completely irrelevent words in the previous commenter's mouth in order to make what passes for a point on the internet. This isn't about two people disagreeing over an issue - this about you wanting someone to publically rail against, and wanting to bring your pet topic to the forefront of this discussion whether it's justified or not.

Nothing - nothing - was mentioned by anyone about abortion, infanticide, prenatal alcoholism, the dangers of ultrasonography, or whatever the hell you're on about. Whatever flag you're carrying here, underhanded propagandic tactics like this do far more to undermine your position in the eyes of others than to strengthen it.

If you really want to "stand up for morals," you can start by standing up for intellectual integrity.

Posted by: Mentalepsy at May 7, 2007 3:16 PM

Whoa, didn't mean to stumble into the crossfire there...just wanted to say that I just got back from the free screening here, and that love for Fillion and loathing of romcoms aside, this was a flat out good movie. I DO love Fillion, and I DO LOATHE romcoms, but I wouldn't call it a romcom. It was relatable, yet sweet, but the laughs were genuine (and hearty) as were the relationships. Just wanted to throw in my two cents and reassure those who were wary of the dreaded chick flick.

Posted by: MG at May 16, 2007 11:33 PM

I doubt anyone is going to read this, but I saw it last weekend. It was great! It was just as Dustin described. That movie kept me up all night. I was thinking about the different messages it delivered. And yes the pies looked AWESOME! The strawberry chocolate one had me slobbering in my seat. I think the best thing about seeing this movie was I saw it at an "artsy" movie theater and watched it with a beer on a comfy couch.

Posted by: lyricalcatt at June 6, 2007 8:57 AM

Hi Lyricalcatt- Yup, I too am a latecomer to this thread, but I had to add the LOVE for this movie. Just saw it last night (I love the six-plex across from my office- they show all types of movies, indy to blockbuster, have $5 Tuesdays, and they have showed Waitress for two weeks so far!!!)
I hate Romcoms so much, but this is not one of those. The characters are not too perfect, not too precocious, nor too evil. Keri Russell's character makes choices that may be flawed, but you can understand them and applaud them; her husband is a terrible husband, but not so evil that he becomes irrelevant, or dismissable. You can understand the driving forces behind each.
I love the fairytale elements of it- like when I read the book Chocolat. Sweet, but not sticky.

Posted by: go big red at June 15, 2007 10:26 AM

Thank you so much for this review. I went to see it mostly on your enthusiasm and I'm so glad that I did. It's amazing.

Posted by: Ruby at June 23, 2007 2:31 PM

im in LA for some time, and there's a theater showing screenings of this. after months and months of searching for it from netflix (lost cuase) to theters back east, i randomly stumbled on it walking down the street today.
i didnt need a pajiba review to tell me this was going to be good.
i enjoyed it soooo much. it's on my list next to knocked up for being so distinctly different from any other romantic comedy i've ever seen. Fillion was so .......so... Nathan. i mean i hate, HATE how underrated he is. seriously. he's just so real on screen. and him and keri worked so well on screen together.

top it off with a Cake song, Andy Griffith, and Billy (Sisto) from Six feet under ( a BIG suprise for me...i couldnt help loving him, even though he wasnt supposed to be a 'love me' character), and there was no way i was walking out of there with anything but love. no way.

hahaha the best part- the theater was scattered with indiviual males ranging from like 18-50. it was beautiful to be sharing a theater with no couples and sowly growing comfortable laughing with a bunch of random guys at a romantic comedy. a thing of beauty.

God bless you Adrienne, not just becuase of the film, it makes me sick knowing what a sweet person you were and what a terrible fate you encountered.

Posted by: MAx at July 20, 2007 5:24 AM

My only problem with the movie was the ending, which seemed like it was trying to be a feminist diatribe about how women don't need a man... Very predictable, and extremely unrewarding, given the build-up of the relationship with Dr. Pomatter...

I agree with you about the feeling it leaves the viewer with, though... and I recommend it for that reason, alone. It's a lovely film, made somewhat bittersweet by Shelly's own fate.

Posted by: elaine at September 6, 2007 3:11 PM