web
counter
 

Hey, Teachers! Leave Them Kids Alone!

By Brian Prisco | Posted Under Film Reviews | Comments (74)



Waiting-For-Superman.jpg

I live in constant fear of morons. When the planes struck the Twin Towers, after watching coverage for a few hours, my initial instinct was that someone, somewhere was going to beat up either a 7-11 manager or a cab driver. And lo and behold, I was right. Because for the most part, as Americans, we’re fucking idiots. We think in the broadest terms, the simplest reactionary thoughts, with little more research than catching a soundbite on our respective medium of choice, and regurgitating it ad nauseum. And we either choose to believe, or to blindly deny. We’ve beaten people over the head with the idea that processed foods are terrible for you, that Wall Street has its fingers so deep into the American Government’s pockets they can count individual ball hairs, and that yes, we did fucking evolve from monkeys. There are still folks who don’t care. Which helps to temper my fears slightly about the reaction to Davis Guggenheim’s latest political-cause documentary Waiting for “Superman.” It’s a powerful indictment of the broken state of America’s education system that offers a scathing swipe at all sides. It even offers possible solutions, ones that I agree with in principle, but disagree with in practice. Yet, my great fear is that most people are going to see this and get fired up at the wrong people. But, then again, the folks that are that stupid won’t see this in the first place, because “Dancing with the Stars” is on.

Guggenheim does for education what he did for the environment in An Inconvenient Truth, which is to neatly package statistics and studies in easy-to-appreciate animations and bar graphs. Building off his 1999 documentary The First Year, Guggenheim takes five statistics and turns them into real students. We follow these five kids as they basically struggle to get a decent education, fighting against the very system that proclaims to want to leave none of them behind. Meanwhile, Guggenheim deftly delivers crushing body blow after body blow to the busted system. The most heinous part of the whole situation is the total and overwhelming awareness of all the parties involved. Yes, we know the system is completely fucked, and we are flushing most of your children to save a rare and fortunate few, but what are we gonna do?

I’d rather you watch the film and grunt, scowl, and shake your head in disgust like I did when you hear the various statistics, rather than sort through all of them repeated and paraphrased here. But here’s one that tickled me endlessly: Something like 68 percent of prison inmates in Pennsylvania are high school dropouts. The state pays $33,000 to house one inmate for a year, which if averaging sentences comes to $132,000 for a 4 year stay. Private schooling in PA costs $8,300 a year. To pay for 13 years of private schooling for one student would actually cost less, leaving over $24,000 aside as a payment for a 4-year state college education. Just something to keep in mind.

Most states are drastically low in basic reading and math comprehension levels. Our high schools, especially ones in the inner cities have turned into “drop-out factories.” I knew it was bad, but actually hearing the numbers is physically painful. Yet, every president (on both sides of the aisle), including our beloved Obama who currently sits upon high, has declared he would be the president to fix education. I’m talking back as far as LBJ. Yet no one has come up with a satisfactory solution. Other than one disastrous attempt which is called No Child Left Behind, the principle of which seems to be that if you get abuse and ignore the children long enough, they’ll quit, which doesn’t count as being left behind.

Guggenheim follows our five children as they attempt to actually get into the good schools — the charter and magnet schools. In the American school system, there are children that can get a decent education, one-on-one assistance, and proper class size. They just have to win the lottery. We watch these poor children’s futures decided on the spin of a bingo caller’s reel or a digitally randomized computer program. That’s not just disgusting, it’s sad. It’s not a matter of, sorry kids, we’ll try again next year. It’s a matter of, “well, maybe your kids will get a good education, try not to die in your high school with teachers who don’t care.”

That’s the part of Waiting for “Superman” that upsets me a little. The problem is with teacher unions for the most part protecting bad teachers with tenure and contracts. Once a teacher gets tenure, which happens after two years of simply surviving and “breathing,” it practically takes an act of God to remove them. Even then, he best borrow some lawyers from Satan. Bad teachers are the problem, and if you could even cull the lowest six to twelve percent of bad teachers, you would improve things. Studies have shown that no matter how much money you throw at the problem, bad teachers and lack of parental involvement will always be the root of the problem. As long as there are teacher unions like the NEA and the ATF, bad teachers will be able to dig in and stick it out.

My concern is how exactly you gauge what makes a bad teacher? Who would be responsible for that decision making? Should it be through the school boards, the school administration, or through student evaluations, or peer evaluations? My fear is that they’d base it on test scores, the very same tests created by No Child Left Behind that are ruining classrooms. Because teachers don’t teach curricula anymore, they teach to the tests. Students don’t learn, they memorize to fill in circles. And that’s just as dangerous. Personally, I blame the insane bureaucracy that the various governments have instituted to allocate funds. Each arm: federal, state, local, and individual, have their own rules and regulations and standards, which are often contradictory and constrictive. They prevent teachers from doing what they are supposed to do: put knowledge in the children’s heads. Being constantly hamstrung and beaten down by the very system put there to help you is going to turn the most inspired teacher into a scowling menace.

That’s what scares me; that people might watch this film and think: it’s the teachers! I knew it! Get the teachers! Those sonsofbitches! And why do I feel this way? Listen to the news if there is ever a teacher’s strike. Most of the time, teachers are asking for a simple 1-2 percent raise for cost of living, and the school boards are demonizing greedy teachers for raising taxes. Then the locals get all up in arms about the monstrous teachers who are trying to take money out of their pockets, and how they should be glad they are lucky enough to even have jobs.

Many of my friends and family are school teachers. My brother teaches first grade. In a decent year, he has something like 25 kids in his classroom. Now, we assume the average daycare cost $20 a day, considering he watches the kids for 6-8 hours. That’s $500 a day for his classroom. The average school year runs 180 days. So, if he were running a daycare, where he wouldn’t even have to teach them anything, just make sure nobody gets bitten or rubs too much poop in their hair, and he’d be pulling down $90,000 a year. You don’t think he’d rather take that paycheck than get shat on by a bunch of angry parents day in and day out? Or a school administration who thinks the teachers are greedy fiends? My brother doesn’t even come close to that, and he’s a male first-grade teacher with a Master’s degree and additional credits. In the classroom, he’s not sitting around reading Maxim while the kids set Andy Panda on fire and stab each other in the eyes with safety scissors.

But there are teachers who do that. And they are the problem. Yes, the unions protect the slackers. The union representatives in the film even say they don’t want teachers considered good or bad, but that a teacher is a teacher is a teacher and they are all heroes. When Michelle Rhee, the chancellor of schools in Washington D.C. came to the union offering them the chance to make double the national average — $132,000 a year — if they would accept merit-based paychecks and get rid of tenure, the union was so freaked out they didn’t even vote on it.

The outmoded bureaucracy currently in place needs to be shredded first. The layers of red tape and checks and balances need to be negated and the teachers need to be free to teach. Then, and only then, can you start working on weeding out the bad teachers. Tenure should be renewable, because some teachers have expiration dates. This is the same practice for doctors, lawyers and most other state licensed career paths. It’s not unreasonable to expect the same, particularly when they are shaping the minds of future doctors and lawyers and lawmakers. But not film critics, because we learn on the streets.

Guggenheim’s documentary is heart-crushing but hopeful. It points out there is a terrible problem, and then uses a shit-ton of emotional manipulation to demonstrate how horrible it really is. That a child’s mind is about as valuable as a scratch lottery ticket is embarrassing. This will assuredly be received like his An Inconvenient Truth, with Oscar nominations, including one for the even better song by John Legend at the end of the film. I refuse to refer to this film as “important,” because that is such a ridiculously overwrought cliche, but people should see this. If only because I’d like to see people get as fired up about the education problem in this country as they did about a bunch of fucking dolphins getting harpooned to death. I also feel like Obama’s the kind of president who wouldn’t just give a speech if he saw people really angry about education, he’d goddamn do something about it, even if he had to go all Bruce Lee and kung fu the fucking Board of Education in half with his bare hands. So go see it, cry like I did, and then get fucking mad as hell and don’t take it anymore.









Each Time You Like, Share, Tweet or Stumble a Pajiba Post, An Angel Does the Paul Rudd Dance



"No Ordinary Family" Review | A "Modern Family" of "Heroes" that Lives in "Smallville" | The Ten Best Clint Howards | Actors that Always Make You Think of their More Famous Siblings









Comments

I fucking love you. That's all there is to it. Awesomely written, man.

Posted by: Skitz at September 28, 2010 3:08 PM

Great review, Prisco. I'll be seeing this as soon as I can.

Posted by: B.F.D. at September 28, 2010 3:14 PM

I am really excited to see this movie, although the preview made me cry. I was fortunate enough to grow up in one of the top ranked school systems in America. It never even occurred to me that not everyone had access to good education when I was a kid. Even being in a great school system, though, I was astonished as how different it was for students in the GT/AP programs. We received a much better education. In those classes, teachers taught to the highest common denominator; in regular classes, to the lowest. I don't have any ideas for solutions. I wish I did.

Also, the tenure issue is really different in public schools than at the college level. I hope people realize that. It's not a union thing at the college level either.

Posted by: Katie at September 28, 2010 3:15 PM

Brian Prisco, you are among my heroes and I love you to death.
Thank you.

Posted by: Spender at September 28, 2010 3:19 PM

Once a teacher gets tenure, which happens after two years of simply surviving and “breathing,” it practically takes an act of God to remove them.

Whoa. Hold the phone here. Schools give tenure after two years? In NJ, it's three years and a day, so the school can give teachers their walking papers on the last day of their third year and never offer tenure if they don't want to. Many do for years at a time if the budget is tight (thanks to state cutbacks and townspeople never voting to pass the school budget initiatives).

I'm really afraid to see this documentary because I fear my head will explode from the "blame the teacher's union" argument. Like, I'm going to be carried out of the theater in a straight jacket after I start screaming and flinging feces at the screen. To be blunt about it, the union makes it so that teachers can have some job security (not infallible, as a single writ by the Board of Ed could just eliminate teaching positions if they fudge attendance numbers and curriculum standards enough) and a steady salary (which, again, can be broken). So, it's about as powerful as an ant fighting a steamroller; it's not.

With that said, I think you wrote a great review, Brian Prisco, though I'd like to see someone figure out just how we can evaluate every teacher in the country for renewable tenure when most state's budgets won't even cover the continued support of public libraries. I mean, how much money do we have to siphon away from basic necessities at schools to form the committees to evaluate the situation in order to plan a course of action that will require a public vote to implement and more money to actually roll out on a probationary basis before everything is re-evaluated for national use?

Posted by: Robert at September 28, 2010 3:21 PM

An interesting counterpoint in today's Times about Brockton High School up in Massachusetts. 4200 students, very diverse/working-class place, and they managed to improve drastically while using traditional routes. Ditto last week's opening "Talk of the Town" in the New Yorker.

I've posted ad nauseum about these issues, so I'll pipe down.

Posted by: samantha t at September 28, 2010 3:22 PM

Tenure is a fucking ridiculous thing. I've always argued loudly that it's such a bullshit institution that basically NO OTHER respectable profession employs it.

Unions can be good or bad. Protect the workers and allow them some measure of balance and power. BUT when they become a behemoth who wields their mob power in greedy and corrupt ways, they're as bad as any robber baron.

I think I really hate teachers' unions because the losers in all of it, the ones who get shit on in the middle of their power struggle are the kids. Screw them. No child should be collateral.

Posted by: Parker at September 28, 2010 3:23 PM

I'm really glad you make the point that teachers serve as the scapegoats for bad schools (and therefore all of the nation's problems). As a new teacher, my idealism and drive is challenged by strict standardization, low benefits and social status, and, basically, a continuous flow of crap. I am a highly educated and motivated teacher who can't even find a permanent position because towns are laying off teachers. How does this even make sense? Oh, and because I teach history, which is apparently not an important subject. Awesome.

Posted by: cleverpeach at September 28, 2010 3:23 PM

And yes, it WILL be distilled down to, "It's the TEACHERS! I KNEW it! Let's GET 'em!"

By whom? By the very people who dismissed An Inconvenient Truth utterly.

You know who. I don't even have to say it. But it starts with F and ends with X... and all their little friends, funded by people like Richard Mellon Scaife et al.

Oh, yeah, It will probably make their heads explode to have to find a way to praise this... Maybe they won't. Maybe they'll condemn it while plucking out the ONE thing that confirms their simplistic bullshit.

Sigh.

Posted by: Maryscott O'Connor at September 28, 2010 3:25 PM

I have to preface this - I've lurked on this site for 5+ years now and have NEVER posted before. This topic actually got me fired up.

I'm looking forward to seeing this movie, but I think you (and possibly the film) are missing a huge part of the puzzle - PARENTS.

Education doesn't just come down to teachers, good or bad. I would argue that parental involvement plays an even larger role in educational success than teachers do. How exactly should teachers/administrators/big government FORCE parents to care about their child's education? I'm interested to see how/if the filmmakers address that.

FWIW, I attended a top public school district on the Philadelphia Main Line and now work in public relations for one of the 25th largest school districts in the country.

Posted by: Oasis at September 28, 2010 3:25 PM

Bless you Prisco. You hit every motherfucking nail head.

Posted by: Cindy at September 28, 2010 3:31 PM

I haven't seen the doc but maybe this is covered. I went to school in south central Los Angeles and they are plenty of great teachers. Sure some suck but for the most part the teachers work hard and try to make a difference.
The problem that I see is that some kids just don't give a damn. YOu could have Robin WIlliams in Dead Poest Soceity show up and half the class wouldn't care. Some of them would just go with it because they have to. A small group would pretend not to be into it because they don't want to be made fum of for actually PAYING ATTENTION. And a handfull don't care what people think and enjoy the experience.
I blame the parents for not making sure kids do their homework and investigating to see if their kids are learning anything.
I admit I never liked school and didn't try as hard as I should have. BUt that was my fault. I KNEW WHAT I WAS DOING. I wasn't a moron and it wasn't the teachers fault. I chose not to try my best. I don't want to blame my parents but since that is what I stated as the problem then I kind of have to. They told me stay in school and you need an education to make it in this world. And I got the message. BUt maybe they could have pushed me harder. But like I was saying I knew I could get an A if I applied myself. But I was perfectly happy getting a C without hardly trying.
So, sometimes kids, especially now, just don't care.

Posted by: junierizzle at September 28, 2010 3:38 PM

Please keep in mind not every state even HAS teacher unions and bad teachers are a problem all over.

It's NOT hard to get rid of a bad teacher in Texas, for instance. We are forbidden by state law to organize, except for "professional organizations," which are NOT the same as unions. We have no collective bargaining power. There is no such thing as tenure.

But while you can attract people new to the profession all day long, and while alternate certification programs have made certification easier than ever (which has its own issues, but I'll save that point), it's KEEPING good teachers that proves to be a bigger obstacle. When the only people who WANT to stay are just mediocre at best, your perspective as a principal starts to get skewed, unfortunately.

What I've seen is this: in a typical English department at a typical suburban high school (very large school, let's say), there are 18 teachers. (They are just English teachers, again.)

Of those 18, 3 are really good. Fantastic, even. One is department chair. I'm not understating this, by the way. It's a small percentage, but it's reality.

10 are just average. They're like placeholders. They do an ok job, but don't add a lot of value to their students' language arts skills or knowledge year to year.

The other five are bad. They range from "OH MY GOD GET RID OF HER AT CHRISTMAS" bad to "maybe she can be helped, maybe not" bad.

The reasons are just as varied: maybe one, inexplicably, hates kids. I mean hates them. Hardly bothers to disguise it.

Maybe another one has been bad for years before this principal got here, he's old, and everyone's just waiting, hoping and praying for him to retire.

Another is semi-bad, but is a friend of the superintendent's nephew. Shouldn't be that way, but I've seen it too often to know it IS that way sometimes.

Another comes to school drunk and/or high and it's just a matter of time before she's caught and sent home without pay.

Ok, you get the idea. So the principal gets rid of the ones who cannot be helped/NEED to go. And who does she get to replace them?

New teachers. Who may turn out to be average, may turn out to be equally bad as the one they replaced. There's a tiny chance they'll be good.

It's like this constant carousel.

Posted by: Snuggiepants at September 28, 2010 3:45 PM

Oasis: Bingo. The kids featured in this movie (which is plainly shilling for charter schools) will be fine. Their parents are motivated and those kids are going to rise to the top of any school they attend for that reason.

Posted by: samantha t at September 28, 2010 3:45 PM

I'd also proffer that students do best in the states where teachers are most protected by their unions.

Posted by: samantha t at September 28, 2010 3:47 PM

I meant to say, improve the pay and benefits, improve the working conditions, improve the profession as a whole and you will attract a higher-caliber of person to it.

But that would require, in no small part, money.

I've long thought that a nation's priorities can be seen in how they spend their resources. We (as a country) may SAY we value education, but we've rarely ever put our money where our mouth is. We want to do it on the cheap, then bitch about the results.

Posted by: Snuggiepants at September 28, 2010 3:47 PM

samantha t I don't disagree with you on that.

Posted by: Snuggiepants at September 28, 2010 3:48 PM

Is there a law stating that kids HAVE to go to school? I mean, I live in NYC and in some of the worst high schools there are teens that should basically be in jail for assault or sexual assault, but they don't expel the student. I'm not saying kick a five year old out of school forever, but if a teen fails everything, is violent and has no parental involvement and the system has tried everything, can they say "We give up, now pack your shit and get out"? Just curious about the laws and rules.

Posted by: scorzi at September 28, 2010 3:53 PM

ParentsParentsParentsParentsParentsParentsParentsParentsParentsParentsParentsParentsParentsParentsParentsParentsParentsParentsParentsParentsParentsParentsParentsParentsParentsParentsParentsParentsParentsParentsParentsParentsParentsParentsParentsParentsParentsParentsParentsParentsParentsParentsParentsParentsParentsParentsParentsParentsParentsParentsParentsParents

Posted by: OlorinGrayhame at September 28, 2010 3:53 PM

Cleverpeach is why I walked right up to the edge of getting my secondary history certification and then turned right around and burned the paperwork. They're probably 22-27 years old - I'm 37. I also don't coach football or any other sports; if I was run something extra-curricular, I'd work with the drama program. Good luck with that, eh?

So, yeah, I think I'd not have a job, or be insane from the job I'd get.

Posted by: idiosynchronic at September 28, 2010 3:53 PM

But what is a "bad" teacher? Some will say a bad teacher teaches controversial works of literature or evolution or anything that challenges the dominant local viewpoint. Tenure exists for a reason.

Moreover, while teachers take the heat, they get gets for 6-8 hours per day. Whatever is going on at home, good or bad, has A LOT more impact on a child's future than anything that happens in school.

Posted by: Tracer Bullet at September 28, 2010 3:54 PM

@ Snuggiepants: I like to say that America loves education but hates the educated.

Posted by: Tracer Bullet at September 28, 2010 3:57 PM

idiosynchronic Not to engage in generalizations, but for the most part the better teachers I've seen go into the profession when they are older than their early to mid-20s.

NOT that there aren't good young teachers, there are. But I've found the extra maturity and life experience often helps.

Posted by: Snuggiepants at September 28, 2010 4:02 PM

I don't know if it's a national, state or just school district thing but at my kids' recent open house every single teacher pointed out that they're now required to grade to a set standard of "tests are worth 70% of total grade and all other work is only 30%." Every teacher felt this was ridiculous and I agree.

Not every child tests as well as they do on assignment work but that doesn't mean they're not learning. A good teacher knows what works with their students and can customize their teaching methods to fit that. Then standardized testing throws all that out the window. Everything that works is replaced by tests that weren't designed by those that taught the material in it and then it's forced to count for almost 3/4 of the final grade.

No Child Left Behind was just one more thing in a long list of carefully worded bullshit that came out of the government's beauracrahole. "No Child Left Behind". Who would be against that? Instead of Iraq war we'll give it a modern spin and call it "the War on Terror". No one is going to be OK with "the Bill That Rapes Any and All Privacy", let's call it the "Patriot Act."

Posted by: PaulterA at September 28, 2010 4:02 PM

Tracer Wow, I'm stealing that. TOO true.

Posted by: Snuggiepants at September 28, 2010 4:03 PM

We (as a country) may SAY we value education, but we've rarely ever put our money where our mouth is. We want to do it on the cheap, then bitch about the results.

This isn't something that's confined only to schools - you can easily see the same warped American mindset towards most non-profit social & governmental organizations.

Posted by: idiosynchronic at September 28, 2010 4:04 PM

Say you do spend the money that would be spent on prison and use it to fund a high school education and down payment for college. Perhaps even start a military school style prison high school or something. So what. Kids that don't want to be in school and drop out or commit crimes and end up in prison aren't usually interested in education. It starts with the parents. Too many children, not enough time and/or interest. It's the exceptional child that can rise above that dynamic.

Posted by: rootbound at September 28, 2010 4:04 PM

Tracer, you are a word god amongst the snark.

Snuggiepants, it's the addition of my age & gifts on top of the mandatory NCLB crap and the devaluation & politicization of History and Civics. I'd be crazy, especially when I work tech support as a career, and I have a good position now with a socially-redeeming employer.

I've also met more People in a similar context through my wife's job - People are Fucking Cheap-Ass Bastards. Individuals and families are generous, but that doesn't seem to extend further once it becomes de-personalized.

Posted by: idiosynchronic at September 28, 2010 4:17 PM

My mother is a teacher and so my brother and I attended public schools until college.

NCLB is awful. Let's just get that out of the way right now. BUT NCLB has led to increasing development and implementation of standardized benchmarks. You might not realize this but when those state vs. state rankings are published the tests are generally different for each state. Furthermore each state gets to decide who takes the tests. NCLB ranked the states by student performance AND ranked the tests by difficulty. If you examine those rankings together many of the states at the bottom of the test scores pile are at the top of the difficulty of the test heap. This has always seemed a lousy way to give government grant monies to improve schools. Not mentioning that throwing money at a problem doesn't make it go away.

IMO the problem with education is teachers, it's parents, it's the system. From what I understand of the education system both in my hometown and that of another state where I attended law school it's a bunch of people with certificates that qualify them to be "administrators" or "principals" or "guidance counselors" even though they are completely and totally inept. If the schools were run by businessmen, there wouldn't be these problems.

Also I'd recommend Corridor of Shame if you want to see more about the state of rural education in contrast to the inner city problems. The schools aren't just bad in the cities, they're bad in other places too.

Posted by: talkslow at September 28, 2010 4:22 PM

Prisco - did you every watch The First Year? I'd be interested in a comparison, even if it's like apples and purple-painted snorklewhackers.

Posted by: idiosynchronic at September 28, 2010 4:23 PM

As Brian alluded to in his extremely well written piece, it's an extremely complex issue in which multiple problems all contribute to the the failure of the ultimate goal which is to educate our children. The longer my kids are in school, the more and more I'm exposed to faults within the system. By way of my profession I'm also privy to some of the government policies that tend to exacerbate the problem but disguise it as a solution.

Teachers will get catch the most flak because they're the front line. Also, in this day and age there are a lot of parents (the same ones who tend to be uninvolved in their children's education) who not only expect the school system to educate their children, but raise their child as well. I'm not talking about lower-class, single parent families. I'm speaking of middle class, two parent, both parents work families. Once little Timmy comes home with a bad grade or acts up, it's all the schools fault. The sense of entitlement is appalling. Never mind that's it's impossible to actually fail a grade now.

However teachers and their unions do have to accept some responsibility. Last year there was a teacher who had a grade 2/3 split. The grade 3's essentially did grade two all over again because the teacher didn't have the ability to teach both grades. Complaints were made, meetings were had and what happened? Not a damn thing. No re-structuring, no reprimands, no evaluations, nothing. There are some very bad teachers out there that should never have gotten a job much less had absolute security in it.

Posted by: admin at September 28, 2010 4:28 PM

Sorry, but I call BS on this movie and its Morgan Spurlock level pandering.

You note your concern that the movie may lead people to the conclusion that teachers and teachers unions are the source of the problem. I'm not sure why you are concerned by this - the WHOLE POINT of the movie is to offer up a scapegoat for problems with our education system. Nevermind the fact that the teacher's unions have been around for decades and tenure has been a longstanding institution - our modern troubles are all the fault of the teachers.

And it's just total crap.

The number one problem with our system today? Parents. Everything else, from bad teachers, risk adverse school boards, unimaginative administrators pales in comparison.

Let's also cut the BS about which kinds of students we are talking about. We are talking about low income or otherwise disadvantaged students. 'Cause less than 10 miles from Michelle Rhee is the number one high school in the entire United States (Thomas Jefferson). Go 4 more miles and you run into the #6 school, Langley, and its kissing cousin, McLean High School. What do those schools have in common? They are based in the two richest counties in America - Fairfax County, with a median income of 106,000 a year, and Loudoun County, with a median income of 110,000 a year. Oh, and the counties surrounding DC have the highest per capita number of people with post graduate degrees.

Crazier still? teachers make less in Fairfax and Loudoun than in DC.

So really, the problems are mostly in lower income areas, and in areas with high immigrant populations from mexico and latin America.

Some common defining themes of those areas? Parents without a history of education, or families that see getting into the workforce quickly as more important.

Another defining characteristic? Single parent households (and this is not an attack on those who are single parenting, it's impressive that anyone can even pull it off because parenting is just time consuming). Single parents statistically make less money, and often have jobs that make it harder to be there to help with homework.

And this is what pisses me off the most about the movie and its theme: The parents in the film care about their children's education - that dedication alone puts the kids in the movie head and shoulders above most of their classmates.

So by following the parents who are trying to make a difference, the filmmaker creates the false image that ALL parents care that much and are that dedicated to a successful school system.

And the reality couldn't be further from the truth.

Michelle Rhee did some necessary things in DC, and it is pretty obvious that the DC teacher's union and schoolboard are an unmitigated disaster, but none of it will make any difference at the macro level until you work within communities themselves to teach parents to value education.

Posted by: morganew at September 28, 2010 4:29 PM

Because for the most part, as Americans, we’re fucking idiots.

Yeah. Because we are the only people on the face of the earth who " think in the broadest terms, the simplest reactionary thoughts, with little more research than catching a soundbite on our respective medium of choice, and regurgitating it ad nauseum". Instead of you know, everyone.

Posted by: EricD at September 28, 2010 4:32 PM

If the schools were run by businessmen, there wouldn't be these problems.

GAH!!!! Wrong, wrong, wrong! "Businessmen" implies education can be run as a profit-making organization. It cannot be profitable except in the long-run spanning decades and centuries. What you mean is that management must be empowered to make changes with real consequences, both positive and negative.

The problem (in this sub-argument) are the inept and incompetent Professional Managers, no matter if they have a Master's in Education, an MBA, or a Master's in Public Administration. They are everywhere in business, government, and education.

Posted by: idiosynchronic at September 28, 2010 4:33 PM

Oh bullshit. The fact that a private education in PA costs $8500 a year and a public education costs the taxpaypers $9312 -- and that Prisco didn't know that, or look it up, or consider that it's a national statistical fact that private education costs less than public education per student -- speaks to the biases he approaches this film with.

One of the splendid options in the United States is to move -- find a job, even if it pays less than your last job, and move your kid someplace where public school education is not an insult.

It seems to me that making a drama out of one kid's alleged doom because he or she got boxed out of one lottery system is, to say the least, myopic. There's no shame in moving, and there's no real barrier to moving -- except one's will to do more than bitch about the fact that either my kids' education or my job or my standard of living isn't what I thought it would be when I was sitting on my ass in college watching fucking Seinfeld.

Sure: you could make the argument that the whole world would fall apart if people who cared about their kids more than they cared about their status moved to cities or towns where the education systems were better (not perfect, but better). Who would work on Wall Street? Who would do whatever it is they do in LA? Who would run Coca Cola in ATL? Who would sell shit in Chicago? Who would make beer in STL?

But if the issue really is that we should have great education for our kids at all cost, maybe we should try it out before demanding someone else do it for us -- try out making the sacrifices that someone who is living to give a kid a real chance will make, and therefore teaching them to live for something greater than GTL.

I think this movie is an ideological hoax -- not because I think all public schools are great places to teach a kid how to read, write and reason, but because I think it makes the classic mistake of giving the listener/viewer too few choices and stacks the deck to cause outrage when in fact we are the one who are actually outrageous.

Posted by: Hater from Siloam Springs at September 28, 2010 4:33 PM

Great review. And your last paragraph is so very true: if people would get up in arms about Education instead of fighting to, say, not let people get married, something would be done. But no, it's more important to win an election because you said the "right" thing to your close-minded constituents than it is to win it based on something that would take actual balls to fight.

Posted by: figgy at September 28, 2010 5:31 PM

Awesome review, Prisco.

Just posting the link for those of you interested in the Brockton High School article. They basically managed to make an amazing turnaround through a focus on literacy, and it was brought about by teachers banding together, who had a supportive principal.

And if you'd like to explore some of these issues further, I highly recommend Literacy with an Attitude, by Patrick J. Finn. It addresses both the disadvantages of a low socio-economic status and the motivation issues.

Posted by: leuce7 at September 28, 2010 5:32 PM

Leuce: I was intrigued by the Brockton focus on writing and the school's belief that other skills would follow from strength in writing and reading.

Posted by: samantha t at September 28, 2010 5:48 PM

Sorry, I don't think it's all parents. Or all teachers. Or all administrators. Or all money-related. Or even, much as I hate the damn thing, NCLB.

This is a complex issue. To try to boil it down to one or two "reasons" is missing the point, and you reach Catch-22 rather quickly. To make the situation even more unmeasurable,there are some kids that will shine in whatever goddamn setting you put them in. But how many of you knew rich kids, with parents who pushed them hard, that went to expensive private schools, and still ended up as losers? I can think of four without even trying very hard. Explain to me how my own three siblings -- same parents, same schools -- barely passed high school while I sailed through it in three years?

It just seems like everybody is looking for an easy answer, and gets madder and madder when the easy answers don't really solve the problem. It seems to me that kids start to fall apart academically at puberty, and though we've generally improved early education, this should be the next big push, to keep them engaged through the middle school years. It's a difficult time, and we don't make use of the research that's been done. I saw my daughter being asked to learn abstract math concepts when she was at age when her brain wasn't physically capable of handling that much abstraction. Kids really aren't just miniature adults. What a self-defeating situation, and it all could have been avoided by better timing of the introduction of the subject matter.

Posted by: Wednesday at September 28, 2010 5:59 PM

The flip side to the union and teacher bashing is the touting of charter schools as the answer. That is problematic for several reasons. Here in New York, charter schools do not have to accept student classified as with severe learning or emotional disabilities, English Language Learners, or students more than two years behind in their credits. Yet under-credited students are over 93% of all dropouts, while ELLs and Special Education are disproportionately likely to be pushed out of the school system. This is a solution based on the students who need it the least.

Even with these advantages, charter schools, overall, are doing no better than their public counterparts. That is not to say that there are not excellent charter schools that are doing far better than neighborhood schools. But there are horrible ones as well. Expanding a system that was only meant to serve a small population of students would flood the system with people who have no idea what they are doing. We keep on advocating a deregulation of schools, but there is little evidence to back that up. The takeaway from the Harlem Children’s Zone should not be “yay charters,” but “yay comprehensive community-based services!” Yet that is tremendously expensive and requires a complete overhaul of how we think of serving marginalized communities. It is a lot cheaper to demonize teachers.

Posted by: prynne at September 28, 2010 6:18 PM

I'm of the opinion that there's nothing I can do. It's all down to luck and spectacle. Maybe it'll get better, maybe it won't, but trying won't make a difference. I don't vote, I don't watch the news, I don't sign petitions, I don't attend protests, I don't participate in charities, I don't try to change anyone's mind about anything, and I don't worry about people that I've never met. We're a reactionary species. Very few of us do anything deliberately.

The only way to intentionally make a great social change is for a very few deliberate people to manipulate the great majority of indeliberate people, and I don't want to (or know how to) do that.

Posted by: Lucas at September 28, 2010 6:38 PM

I got pissed just reading this.

Great review Prisco.

Posted by: grace b at September 28, 2010 7:34 PM

Yet, my great fear is that most people are going to see this and get fired up at the wrong people. But, then again, the folks that are that stupid won’t see this in the first place, because “Dancing with the Stars” is on.

This is dead on about everyone in my office. Including the 20 somethings that are my so called peers. They actually watch this shit and support PETA and all these fucking animal rights groups. Which im not saying is bad, but come on support a better more important cause. Just because your fallopian tubes were smited by god (could be the energy drinks) doesnt mean you should give up on humanity.

I hate work.
I hate work.
I hate work.

Posted by: Sad Rockstar at September 28, 2010 8:00 PM

Excellent review, Prisco. I'm forwarding this to my mother, a teacher of some 25 years who is nearing retirement (in the next few years) and practically counting down the days. She would definitely echo some of the points you made, as well as one comment repeated throughout the comment section: Parents, parents, parents.

I hope this movie comes to our tiny lil' town so we can go see it together.

Posted by: MelBivDevoe at September 28, 2010 8:47 PM

I didn't even mention parents, and that was intentional. Why? There's not a whole hell of a lot I can do about that. And I see too many teachers who spend too much time bitching about parents. But I can't go into each of their homes and try to change their circumstances and values and raise their kids. All I can do is all I can do. Kids can overcome bad situations and sometimes it's school that makes the difference.

Posted by: Snuggiepants the Deathbringer at September 28, 2010 9:18 PM

Thank you, Snuggiepants, for all of your excellent points.

Here are a few things that I need to add, and please keep in mind that educational policies vary so much state by state:

1. NEA is not a union; it is a professional organization. In my state, we are not allowed to form unions, so I have to rely on NEA for my professional insurance (which I pay every month for). I have to have this insurance in case a student's family wants to sue me directly, so please don't bash the NEA. It has its flaws, but it has essentially no influence or power in my state.

2. Tenure is also not an option for me. Again, in my state, I have to renew my certification every five years. Don't assume that just because a teacher has been at it for a while that she (and it usually is a she) is sitting on her ass doing nothing.

3. It is extremely difficult to measure what makes a good teacher, and test scores do not tell the entire story. Last year, my students' scores were off the charts amazing. I only had 6 out of all 100+ of my students not pass the end of course test that my state requires. My AP Language students' scores were also 10 points higher than the national average. However, my students this year are much, much lower than my kids last year, so if my abilities as a teacher were to be measured simply by test scores, it would look like I have gotten worse.

Most proposals for merit-pay are tied to measuring a teacher's worth through test scores. This is the easiest way for administrators, parents, etc. to measure a teacher's effectiveness and value, but it should not be the only way. It is very difficult and time consuming to measure what makes a good teacher, and most states aren't willing to create a reliable way of doing this that doesn't only go by test scores.

There are also some serious concerns about the effectiveness of merit pay based on this recent study from Vanderbilt. We should be very cautious. http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/09/21/AR2010092103413.html

4. Bad teachers should be canned. I know I said that it's hard to determine what a good teacher looks like, but it's pretty easy to determine what a bad teacher looks like. Teachers who only give out worksheets, never push their students with challenging assignments, constantly yell, etc. are probably bad teachers. When I can hear a teacher two rooms down from me and across the hall yelling at her students every day, I think I can pretty safely say she is a bad teacher. When I hear the teacher next door to me finish the day's lesson (which is usually a worksheet) with an hour left in class and the students just sit and talk with one another, it's safe to say she's a bad teacher.

5. Parents and students have very little responsibility in education today. If a student does not do well, the blame is put on the teacher. The "unofficial" policy at our school is that no student fails a class without the teacher notifying the parent before the end of the semester. I guess the three progress reports that the school sends out and allowing parents to electronically access their child's grades at any point in the school year isn't enough notification.

6. The entire system needs to be changed. As much as I enjoy American literature, I know that the majority of my students aren't interested in it. Frankly, I find it hard to justify why they need this class to graduate. It would be much more beneficial if I could teach a writing class to my students and let the literature part of the current curriculum be an elective. As it is, there is so much pressure to get through a certain number of novels and short stories each year that writing is put on the back burner. As a result, many of my juniors come to me not able to write a complete, coherent sentence, but they know all about one or two particular pieces of literature. We need to have a serious discussion in this country about what it means to be educated and what skills and abilities we should require of our students. Our current curriculum is too focused on content rather than skill.


That's about it for now. I've gone on for far too long, and I'm getting very tired of making these points again and again whenever conversations about education come up.

Posted by: Sarahcat at September 28, 2010 9:48 PM

I haven't seen the movie yet, but I think everyone should read Dumbing Us Down, or Weapons of Mass Instruction by John Taylor Gatto before seeing this film. I just have a feeling that the film won't address anything that is discussed in Gatto's books - mainly that the school system sucks because it is meant to suck. The "less fortunate" ones discussed in the review are less fortunate because our society/economy is based on mindless consumption and someone needs to do the consuming.

Posted by: MattGaz at September 28, 2010 10:13 PM

So here is what makes me hopeful about education in the US: the middle school where I work. Middle school is insane. Nobody likes middle school. Every time I tell someone what age group I work with, they make an "ughh" face. The kids are hopped up on hormones and have the attention span of gnats, but you know what? Our teachers will teach the hell out of a class. (A good 95% of them, at least.) I am genuinely surprised and excited every day to see what my fellow teachers are doing, and what the students are learning, creating, and presenting.

Posted by: ami at September 28, 2010 10:26 PM

The fact that you think this was a decent doc bothers me to an extreme level, and shows you have little to no grasp of real problems in problem districts.

Do you have any idea how little money and resources urban schools get? How tenure for different districts is actually up to 4 years, and not 2, as in others, leading to many young and good teachers being fired to open up cheaper positions for new hires?

There are many shitty teachers out there... But there are FAR more districts in urban areas that get shitty amounts of funding compared to their private or suburban counterparts. Do a little more research next time before you agree with a simplistic generalization of a poor film.

Posted by: Graham at September 28, 2010 11:12 PM

It is not bad teachers. It is not Unions. Blaming teachers and unions is what leads to all these horrible privatized charter schools and more and more and more funding being cut and lost. Teachers barely get paid more than a taco bell manager, and yet they are constantly the scape goat for a system that is designed to fail. What does any politician or leader want with a truly educated population? They cause trouble and notice when they've been lied to. What jobs do we have for a mass educated population? Business needs shoppers. Jails need prisoners. The tiny elite that actually runs things will always have access to excellent education. Everyone else is irrelevant.

Posted by: John G. at September 29, 2010 12:43 AM

"Too long, didnt read" summary: Someone has to mop the floors and flip my burgers.

Schools are a joke largely because schools refuse to admit that some kids just arent good enough to graduate. This is the parents fault, the students fault, the teachers fault and the administrators fault. Blame them all. But the reasons our schools are a joke boils down to an adherence to the idea that every child has potential.

They don't. Not every kid is cut out for college. Hell, a lot of them aren't cut out for high school. They deserve every resource we have to help them meet our standards but if they cant, we should cut them loose.

Problem is, instead of admitting that some kids are just born to flip burgers, we instead lower our standards to a point that everyone can meet them. Parents dont like admitting that their kids are stupid, teachers take it as a failure, administrators worry about lost money and the students simply refuse to take responsibility.

But those kids are dragging down our entire schools system. Talk about anchor babies... sheesh!

Your kid has the IQ of a warm jar of mayonnaise? Sorry, he doesnt get a special test. He just isnt smart enough to graduate. Doesn't mean he's worthless, it just means academia isn't for him. Here's a spatula, a mop and an application for McDonalds.

Giggity!

Posted by: Lennon at September 29, 2010 3:21 AM

Thats bullshit Lennon. Yes some kids are too dumb, but do you really think the reason americans do so much worse than everyone else is because americans are just dumber than the rest of the world?

Posted by: lol at September 29, 2010 6:08 AM

"But how many of you knew rich kids, with parents who pushed them hard, that went to expensive private schools, and still ended up as losers?"

Honestly, not that many. Perhaps my definition of "loser" is different than others, though. A lot of my clients fall into this category and many of them just end up working in the family business in some ministerial capacity. I don't considering that being a "loser".

"Problem is, instead of admitting that some kids are just born to flip burgers, we instead lower our standards to a point that everyone can meet them. Parents dont like admitting that their kids are stupid, teachers take it as a failure, administrators worry about lost money and the students simply refuse to take responsibility."

I think part of the issue is that, in this country, having a menial job, regardless of your intellectual capacity, typically dooms you to a lifetime of poverty, servitude, spotty health coverage, etc. It's not just about having a job some would consider tedious or beneath them. That's why people are pushing so hard, not because they're convinced everybody's a damn genius.

If we treated our burger-flippers a little better, I don't think we'd have this college-panic. My father graduated high school, went into the military, and then worked as an auto worker for 25 years. Owned a home, went to the beach every summer, had two cars, etc. We weren't rich, but we led a life that had a little dignity to it. He was in a union and I bet worked with a lot of other "not college material" types.

Posted by: samantha t at September 29, 2010 10:28 AM

Thats bullshit Lennon. Yes some kids are too dumb, but do you really think the reason americans do so much worse than everyone else is because americans are just dumber than the rest of the world?

Way to miss the point entirely but to answer your question... kind of.

See, heres the problem. Our school system is afraid to tell parents that their kids are just stupid. Everyone is a special little snow flake.

We don't cut kids loose and we don't fail them. Thats mean and cruel. We adjust the tests. We remove 2 of the four answers in multiple choice questions. We only require that they take half the test. We extend the time limits.

"Teaching" doesn't actually exist any more. Classes in high schools are now simply a review of previous test questions and classes on "how to take a test" because not everyone can grasp the concept of critical thinking and reasoned based problem solving. But most kids can grasp the concept of "when in doubt, its more harmful to guess than leave the question blank".

These idiotic kids that we insist must pass high school are dragging the system down for the kids who could truly excel. We can't teach the smart kids, we cant enforce a culture of academic rigor and excellence because we're too damned busy trying to make sure little sally passes high school with an 8th grade level reading ability. Because shes still special, even if she can't read good.

We need to change the mentality from "pander to the stupid kids" to "challenge the smart kids". No Child Left Behind may not leave anyone behind (oh, it does) but the greatest tragedy is that it sure as hell doesn't push anyone forward.

I think part of the issue is that, in this country, having a menial job, regardless of your intellectual capacity, typically dooms you to a lifetime of poverty, servitude, spotty health coverage, etc. It's not just about having a job some would consider tedious or beneath them. That's why people are pushing so hard, not because they're convinced everybody's a damn genius.

This assumes that everyone wants to go to college. Many kids don't. Many kids simply aren't gonna make it in college. By insisting that every single one of our high school students be prepping to go to college, we are wasting valuable time and resources. The greatest move my old school district ever did was build a vocational/tech school. Hells-to-the-yea.

The problem at that school? Kids are still made to pass standardized tests handed down by NCLB as if they were preparing for college.

lesigh.

Posted by: Lennon at September 29, 2010 11:59 AM

"This assumes that everyone wants to go to college."

You've misread my comment. I'm not assuming everybody wants to go to college, I'm questioning the premise you establish: that parents push kids to go to college because they believe their child is a "special snowflake" (a mean-spirited phrase that I'm ready to retire).

"Our school system is afraid to tell parents that their kids are just stupid"

Seldom is the issue as simple as "Hey, I guess you're just stupid" (appropriate application to Sarah Palin notwithstanding).

Posted by: samantha t at September 29, 2010 1:21 PM

Look, I didn't have time to read all of the comments yet so I apologize if I repeat something someone has already said but....

Parental influence has way, way , WAY more to do with student success than one good or bad teacher. You do drop a little drizzle of parental responsibility somewhere up there, but the bottom line is that if parents don't read, their kids don't read. If their parents don't care, their kids don't care. If no one is home making sure they are doing their homework, the kids aren't doing their homework.

You have a bad teacher for what, one year? A semester? At most? (maybe more if they teach a few grades but it's negligible). You have your parents your whole goddamn life. It's not all the terrible teacher's unions... we have a parenting problem in this country, point blank. It is very hard for even the best teacher to overcome apathetic parenting.

It gets to irksome hearing all of these "wah wah government come fix my boo boo" arguments. Isn't the family the core of society? And if there is a serious problem in society, must we not first look to the most organic source of that problem, which is a problem in the family?! The institution of learning is based on a broader base-- that of the American people. Our system is made of people, our values are what translate into the system. So we need to change our values. That has to happen first, before anything else changes.

(If you look at schools that have historically underperformed, the ones that turned around and became examples did so by incorporating parental involvement. It was the parents that became the keystone in the entire change, not firing all the teachers or making more tests required.)

Posted by: Lbees at September 29, 2010 7:38 PM

This is a very complex issue - one that I have been thinking about for years. I actually wrote my graduate thesis on educational inequality in this country. A major problem with our education system is the way schools are funded. The vast majority of funds come from local land taxes, then money from the state, and last and least federal funds. If a district has a high tax base - lots of private homes and businesses - schools are well funded. If a community has a low tax base - abandoned property, churches, state-owned land, or most residents are renters - schools lose income. As a result, suburban schools tend to be high performing while inner city and very rural schools struggle.

In my opinion, a step in the right direction would be to reform the funding process. The federal government could provide a certain amount per pupil, then the state contributes a per pupil amount. The local taxes could supplement the funding. At least this way, schools could be on more equal footing.

For anyone who is interested, Jonathon Kozol has done some excellent research in this area. His books are very readable and heartbreaking.

Posted by: Anne at September 29, 2010 8:14 PM

What's interesting (in a Chinese-proverb-type way) is the number of similarities between the problems the US education system faces and the UK one. One particular thing that always strikes me about education is the importance of qualifications; successive governments have used the numbers of students passing national exams (at 16 and 18 over here, as we don't exactly graduate high school - you can leave at 16 and not be considered a drop-out) as evidence that standards are improving. But if the results improve every year (which they have for the past 20+ years) does that mean that education is really better? And how does that mesh with the fact that the UK has lower levels of literacy and numeracy than most of our European neighbours?

Posted by: lingli at September 30, 2010 6:29 PM

The problem with teachers is easily solved: double the pay. We need to get more of our best people into the profession.

But that will not solve the problem. White society does not much appreciate intelligence and education, and the ethnic minorities, Asians and Jews excepted, do not value it at all. We need outreach programs for parents who want their kids to do better than they did, and it would be nice if Hollywood would add respect for education to the list of causes they support.

Posted by: Chuck Vekert at October 1, 2010 4:14 PM

And BTW, we are not descendant from monkeys. The ape linage split off from ours millions of years ago.

Posted by: Chuck Vekert at October 1, 2010 4:16 PM

If your brother worked in daycare he'd be making less than $30,000 per year. Not $90,000 (that's ridiculous). My mother was the director of a children's center and she made less than $90,000 and all of her employees made less than $30K. "Daycare" is even less lucrative than teaching. Just FYI.

Posted by: rc at October 2, 2010 2:24 AM

There are many ways a principal can make bad tenured teacher quit (changing the grade they teach every year, observing their class 2x a day, assigning extra jobs)

I have heard of way too many principals who use these tactics.

Tenure protects good teachers from the whims of their principals.

Posted by: Julie at October 2, 2010 6:26 PM

Well reviewed. I am a prospective teacher and this makes me sad and want to pledge to be different, to not bend to the structures of "the system". By the way this sounds, that may be easier said than done. I hope I can hold out and keep some of my principles once I permanently start my career.

Posted by: RichieRich at October 2, 2010 9:36 PM

The movie is incredibly unbalanced, please read more about this issue: http://www.nybooks.com/articles/archives/2010/nov/11/myth-charter-schools/?pagination=false

Posted by: clarity at October 24, 2010 12:30 AM

My son had to watch this for extra credit in one of his college classes, so I took him to see it.

While I agree that there are terrible teachers that need to be flushed from the system, there are also at least two other facets to the problem.

One is that the great American passtime has turned into suing the living shit out of anybody you don't agree with, or who tells you that your little Johnny or Suzy isn't good enough, or needs to fucking behave or whatever.

When I was in school (way back in the fucking stone age), teachers were respected and feared. They had the capability of inflicting corporal punishment (within reason) in their classroom and if you were busy grab assing, you were in danger of being punished in front of everybody.

Another is that the parents just can't be bothered. Ask any teacher and they'll generally tell you that the parents who show up for parent teacher conferences are generally the ones who need it least. The ones whos kids are lagging behind don't go.

Then, when it's time to promote, you'd damned well better promote them! Don't even THINK of holding Junior back because he can't fucking read.

Or, they get "socially promoted".

The one fact that really caught my eye was that America led the field in self esteem. Because God forbid that a teacher should tell one of their charges that they're anything less than special. That would hurt their precious little psyche.

I'm a firm believer that children will respond to the level of challenge. If the bar is set high, they will respond that way. If they're damned with low expectations...

One final note, good call that teachers are "teaching the test". I've witnessed it and did a slow burn. You're absolutely correct that nobody is actually teaching a subject any longer and are teaching to the test.

The solution?

I wish I had a good one. One that would require nothing more than waving the magic wand and making everything good again.

Perhaps vouchers and parental choice ARE the way to go. Once the schools see where the kids are being sent, and what's working...

Posted by: Uncle JR at October 25, 2010 7:26 PM

Hmmmm, insightful… Furthermore, i learned that In his 6 seasons with the Cleveland Cavaliers, Brazilian forward/center Anderson Varejaohas averaged 7. points, 6.7 rebounds and 24.1 minutes per match.

Posted by: Carla Garrels at November 1, 2010 5:56 AM

Mighty post I enjoyed it. Someone else once said: I don't think it is possible to give tips for finding one's voice; it's one of those things for which there aren't really any tricks or shortcuts, or even any advice that necessarily translates from writer to writer. All I can tell you is to write as much as possible.

Posted by: Rick Clouden at November 8, 2010 12:29 PM

This is getting a bit more subjective, however this is a great blog.keep up the good work.

Posted by: Gregory Despain at January 1, 2011 11:03 AM

I went over this web site and I believe you have a lot of fantastic information, bookmarked (:.

Posted by: Terrell Loewenstein at January 7, 2011 10:57 AM

Yes, I agree with the above poster although I suppose you need to put the matter into context of wht is actually being asked for here

Posted by: Yes, I agree with the above poster although I suppose you need to put the matter into context of wht at January 23, 2011 8:14 AM

Unquestionably believe that which you stated. Your favorite reason seemed to be on the internet the simplest thing to be aware of. I say to you, I definitely get irked while people consider worries that they just do not know about. You managed to hit the nail upon the top and also defined out the whole thing without having side-effects , people could take a signal. Will probably be back to get more. Thanks

Posted by: increase serp at January 26, 2011 8:51 AM

Definitely believe that which you said. Your favorite justification appeared to be on the internet the simplest thing to be aware of. I say to you, I definitely get annoyed while people think about worries that they plainly do not know about. You managed to hit the nail upon the top as well as defined out the whole thing without having side effect , people could take a signal. Will probably be back to get more. Thanks

Posted by: increase serp at January 26, 2011 1:00 PM

I cant believe the nba basketball is going to risk losing one of the best players in his prime to the nba basketball. wholesale nhl jerseys.

Posted by: discount at March 2, 2011 12:51 PM

Enjoyable, they urgent to be taught that filing lawsuits is not the carry to in all directions from add up to readable an outshine to piracy. In favourite to, it’s to dinghy something make a laughing-stock of than piracy. Like dormant of use. It’s in good dogma a a barrel easier to utter iTunes than to search the Internet with hazard of malware and then crappy attain eminence, but if people are expected to repay be put out to grass from loads and chum around with annoy elbows with on seeing that ages, it’s not advantageous to work. They but would less a squat together to the fore people invent software and Springe sites that goat it ridiculously b to picaroon, and up the quality. If that happens, then there determination be no stopping piracy. But they’re too discerning and on tenterhooks of losing. Risks spiffy up to be protected! wholesale nhl jerseys.

Posted by: wholesale at March 3, 2011 9:09 PM