free counter with statistics Valkyrie Review | Pajiba - Scathing Reviews for Bitchy People

photo_06_hires.jpg
Merry Nazi Film!

Valkyrie / Dustin Rowles

Film Reviews | December 30, 2008 | Comments (90)


I loathe reviewing Tom Cruise films. It’s so difficult critiquing them objectively when Cruise is such a competent actor and yet so incompetent at life. For so many years, Cruise managed to maintain focus in his celebrity life, to stay on message, to keep those embarrassing tabloid stories under control. And although he lost that with his Katie Holmes courtship and his submersion into Scientology (a religion, I might add, that’s not any more or less crackpot than some of the more established ones — I’m talking to you, Mormons, with your magic, evil-thwarting undies), Cruise still maintains that focus in his acting life. You can say a lot about Tom Cruise, but his performances rarely ruin movies. Some of his movies aren’t as good as others, but with the exception of perhaps the early-career Cocktail and Legend, he doesn’t make embarrassing movies, nor does he turn in particularly embarrassing performances, at least when you compare them to other modern leading men, most of whom — save for Tom Hanks — have made an embarrassing film or two over the past decade (see, e.g., Will Smith’s Seven Pounds and Jim Carrey’s Yes Man). Tom Cruise is not a great actor (though, he’s had some great performances — Collateral, Jerry Maguire), but he’s not a bad one, either. He’s competent. Exceptionally so, in fact.

Moreover, Operation Valkyrie is an impressive story. And, in Valkyrie, Brian Singer has created an impressive movie. Tom Cruise, as ever, is competent as Colonel Claus von Stauffenberg, the central figure in the final plot to assassinate Adolf Hitler. Still, I don’t blame the German people for their hostility toward the film. Nevermind that without Cruise’s (diminishing) clout and his own studio’s backing, the movie may not have been produced at all (nor would it have attracted the immense supporting talent), and nevermind the fact that Cruise brings as much exposure and as many people into theater seats as he turns away. The truth is, Germans are rightfully upset that one of their national heroes will now forever be associated with a man who leapt up and down on Oprah’s couch. It’s just a shame we can’t separate the man from the actor, because — for those capable of putting aside their real-life associations and put up the admission price — for two hours, Katie Holmes, Oprah, and Scientology will never enter your mind, although I can promise this to most of you: The increasing levels of tension may leave you with a jaw as sore as mine when you walk out, and you may wonder how many of the German men involved in the plot managed to get as far as they did without eating a gun.

Indeed, you may not know the details of Operation Valkryie, and you may have never heard of Colonel von Stauffenberg, but anyone with a passing knowledge of world history knows how the story will end. They just don’t know how or when, and credit Bryan Singer and his The Usual Suspects scriptwriter, Christopher McQuarrie, for making a movie as riveting and tense as Valkyrie, despite working with a conclusion that’s never in doubt. And yes: The accents are all over the place, but they’re consistent within the characters (some have American accents and some have British, don’t aske me why, but I don’t think it’s Cruise’s fault), but forget what you’ve heard about Tom Cruise’s performance. He doesn’t ruin Valkyrie — he’s a little over-earnest and, at times, a little too energetic for a decidedly somber movie, but when can you not say that about a Tom Cruise character? Besides, Valkyrie is the rare movie where the direction, the script, and world history cast a shadow over the actors.

The story is one, I imagine, that’s little known outside of Germany or college history classes. In the months leading up to the Normandy invasion, when it already appeared as though Germany would eventually lose the war, a group of high-level military men and politicians at odds with Hitler and his philosophy banded together with a common purpose: Fight not for Hitler, but for Germany. Their goal was to assassinate Hitler and orchestrate a fairly complicated overthrow of the government and then put themselves in a position of power and surrender to the Allies on sympathetic terms. The lynchpin in this conspiracy was Stauffenberg (Cruise), a wounded officer who was in charge of Germany’s Reserve Army. Operation Valkyrie was approved by Hitler as a means to use that Reserve Army to quell civil unrest in the event that Germany was bombed by the Allies. However, Stauffenberg and his co-conspirators altered the plan in such a way that, if successful in assassinating Hitler, they could use the Reserve Army to neutralize the SS and take over the government.

You don’t have to be a PhD in German history to know how it ends. But that doesn’t take away from the impact of the story and the obvious courage of the men involved. It’s a cold, clinical film but I appreciated Singer’s approach to the material over the approach a lot of other American directors would’ve taken — many would’ve overplayed the patriotic aspects of of the mission and turned Valkyrie into a jingoistic, flag-waving, war-hero flick with Bruce Willis playing the pivotal role. Singer’s movie is detached, and there’s no attempt to inject America’s brand of hoo-ra patriotic fervor into the storyline. It’s not an action-packed movie with big Oscar performances; it’s more in line with the German personality: Taut, no-nonsense, and efficient.

Indeed, Valkyrie is a seriously grim film one about a Very Important Event. Valkyrie may suffer from McQuarrie’s refusal to streamline the story, from the filmmakers’ refusal to get inside the minds of the participants and their motivations, and from the lack of any meaningful character development, but Operation Valkyrie wasn’t about the individuals and Singer wasn’t trying to create a character you could fall in love or sympathize with. From the perspective of history, Operation Valkyrie was more than the sum of its individuals; symbolically, it suggested that Germany during World War II had a little more underneath the hood than the Big Evil Dictator logo emblazoned upon it. The disappointment in the Operation lay less with the plight of the individual men and their failure to assassinate Hitler, and more in their failure to alter history for the better. Bryan Singer, likewise, wisely attaches more significance to the resistance than to the resistors, and the result is not a Tom Cruise Film, but an entertaining, suspenseful thriller that just happens to star a Tom Cruise.

Dustin Rowles is the publisher of Pajiba. He lives withi his wife and son in Portland, Maine You can reach him via email, or leave a comment below.


2008 Time Capsule | Spirit, The Review



Comments

On a personal note for those who read my earlier review of Bedtime Stories, if you can fucking believe it, there was another wailing infant in this screening. Fortunately, that hugely rude and irresponsible father left an hour in with his infant and toddler in tow. Dear God why would you bring a small child and a baby to see Valkyrie?

Posted by: Dustin Rowles at December 26, 2008 8:33 PM

I, an exMormon, just had to pop in to thank you for pointing out the ridiculousness of both Scientology and Mormonism. Blegh.

And I think I would have liked Valkyrie more if I didn't have to screen it on Christmas Eve at the theatre I work at.

That is all.

Posted by: Mike at December 26, 2008 8:47 PM

If only the previews had made the film seem less B to the O-RING, I might have been inclined to see it. As it is, not so much.

Posted by: Clee Shay at December 26, 2008 8:51 PM

Wait. So you are saying this is actually good? God damn it. I was so prepared to hate the shit out of this movie! Now that my brother and his sister is compelling me to be nicer to Twilight funs, where am I to direct my Holiday vitriol?!

I need my righteous hatred without feeling like a self-important douche bag!

Posted by: yocean at December 26, 2008 9:04 PM

Hi yocean, I left a lil sometin sometin for you over at the Benjamin Button movie review.

Posted by: Pookie at December 26, 2008 10:02 PM

Wow, I might actually see this now. The studio should be paying you for this review, Dustin. Or maybe the theaters? Or maybe you should reimburse me the ticket price? I'm not sure, either way great review.

Posted by: the_wakeful at December 26, 2008 10:12 PM

YEAH, BUT DOES THE HITLER DIE?????

Posted by: Withnail at December 26, 2008 10:24 PM

Sorry about the screaming infants, Dustin. Why would parents think toddlers would enjoy Nazi war dramas?
I am all astonishment about the lack of bitchiness in this review. Had the shrieking children numbed your brain?
Normally I love history films, but this one looks BORING. Especially because *SPOILER* Hitler doesn't die. Why would I watch Tom Cruise for two hours when I already know the ending?

Posted by: Empress of All the Russias at December 26, 2008 10:27 PM

You guys, all this talk about death and dying is so not cool.

Posted by: Pookie at December 26, 2008 10:30 PM

Nice review there, almost makes me want to spend two hours of my life watching Cruise with an eyepatch (but no pegleg). I know that there is a chance Cruise might not be loathesome in this film; after all, he was okay in Dances With Geisha The Last Samurai. Still, I'd rather stick forks in my eyes than watch this film, the trailer alone makes my hands inch towards the cutlery drawer.

P.S. Legend is a brilliant film. Skip the yawn-fest beginning and all the snaggletoothed-Tom scenes and go straight to Tim Curry and The Awesome Black Dress.

Posted by: YeahButNoBut at December 26, 2008 10:50 PM

This is great review, it is exactly my problem with Tom Cruise movies. We were just discussing today how they are always good movies, if you can stomach the see-tom-run aspect of it. I fear that he has ruined my suspension of disbelief with all his couch jumping, but this review makes me reconsider my could shoulder.

Posted by: Mrs-Swan at December 26, 2008 11:08 PM

Pookie:

Awwww, you sweet bustard. I love what you did there.

Thanks. Now I can sleep better.

Posted by: yocean at December 26, 2008 11:25 PM

Dustin, I nearly always agree with you but you are wrong about Scientology. It is nowhere near a religion. I'm not one of those Anonymous people but I have lived in Clearwater and I'm telling you, Scientology is more like the Mafia than the Mormans. And Tom Cruise is their living figurehead and will always be naughty in my eyes.

But I might rent this. Someday.

Posted by: Jodeci at December 26, 2008 11:36 PM

Izzard + Nighy = I'm there regardless.

Posted by: Mimi at December 26, 2008 11:56 PM

Withnail....


*slow clap*


that is all.

Posted by: nikky at December 26, 2008 11:57 PM

Caught it yesterday in a packed theater -- every screen was sold out.

BTW, why would a parent bring kids to this movie? Simple. Because there are 4 things to do on X-Mas Day:
1. Stay at home
2. Visit Family
3. Go to Church
4. Go to Movie Theater

You can't even visit a strip club! (Well, except for the non-denominational ones)

As for Valkyrie, I think efficient is the best word for it. There's no point where the sense of dread over the ultimate outcome doesn't hang from it. All the actors involved carry themselves well as placeholders for the historical counterparts. I only gripe about 2 things: 1) Carice Van Houten is wasted here. 2) I'd have liked more on the backgrounds of the men involved in the conspiracy. They seem to just want to kill Hitler because he's Hitler and thus evil.

Not that I disagree with that assessment. Just saying that if you're a German military officer, then you probably have conflicting emotions. None appear here save for Eddie Izzard's.

Posted by: Fredo at December 27, 2008 12:48 AM

Let me guess, the kids name was Adolph Hitler Campbell, and his Dad took him to the movie to celebrate his birthday?

Any word if Hitler dies in the DVD-exclusive alternate ending?

Posted by: JP at December 27, 2008 2:23 AM

I chose "The Spirit" over this movie, and I couldn't help but notice that there wasn't a review for that "movie", so heres mine.

You'll enjoy leaving the theater a whole helluva lot more than you'll enjoy the movie. Walking out of those doors was like taking a massive dump right on the faces of all of the obnoxious tween princesses in the world. I'm still shuddering with satisfaction from the experience of LEAVING THE FUCKING THEATER. YOU MADE A BAD MOVIE FRANK MILLER, NO AMOUNT OF TIT AND BOOTY COULD MAKE UP FOR WHAT YOU FORCED THROUGH MY RETINAS.


That being said, I'm still mildly irked about the whole "not even trying for german accents" thing, but will prolly see the movie anyway

Posted by: Braski at December 27, 2008 3:11 AM

Yeah.

I'm still not going to see it.

Scientology isn't a religion. It's like the Jonestowncult, except imagine those under Jones actually managed to usurp the nutter in charge and turn the cult into a profitable business.

Plus, as I've said before, Scientology believes that the holocaust was actually perpetrated by psychiatry and "Big Pharma" - essentially taking all responsibility for the genocide off the shoulders of the Nazi's.

A Nazi movie by a Holocaust denier? How about we get Mel Gibson to do The Diary of Anne Frank - he could rewrite the ending so that the family get's hungry and eats her!

Posted by: Darth Brookes at December 27, 2008 3:36 AM

Doesn't ruin movies you say? I take it you missed Mission Impossible 2 and 3...YES 3 no amount of Seymour Hoffman can fix that shit.

As far as Valkyrie is concerned, it looks to me as if he's doing his stock "Cruise in Uniform" persona from "A Few Good Men"

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at December 27, 2008 4:33 AM

"The truth is, Germans are rightfully upset that one of their national heroes will now forever be associated with a man who leapt up and down on Oprah's couch."

I couldn't care less.

What I'm really upset with is that this glitz flic is going to pave the way the world will recognize Stauffenberg and his "we are the better German posse because we like to see Germany win" as heroes. They were in fact the better nationalists and liked to see Germany as superior nation in Europe but in a more effective way than Hitler could pull. So I guess this revisionism clusterfuck will make the conservative right here quite happy.

And please, cast of the movie, stop talking bullshit about the Staufenberg crew. Yes I look in the direction of Kenneth Branagh (http://www.worstpreviews.com/headline.php?id=6111). Keep focusing on Shakespear or whatever suits you.

Posted by: Robert at December 27, 2008 7:40 AM

I don't get all the Scientology hate. Until Scientologists start killing in Xenu's name, I have nothing against it.

Posted by: kayla at December 27, 2008 7:49 AM

kaylaI don't get all the Scientology hate. Until Scientologists start killing in Xenu's name, I have nothing against it.

They have Agent Bedhead has a load of stuff on that on her site; this is the reason for the scientologist hate, not because they worship aliens or whatever, it's how they act.

Posted by: cockroach at December 27, 2008 8:44 AM

Damn. Well, then it's just as ridiculous as Christianity. And I thought it was just silly alien worship and vitamin addiction.

Posted by: kayla at December 27, 2008 8:55 AM

This is gonna be a classic, played over and over again on TBS! We know Funny!

Posted by: achtung at December 27, 2008 9:38 AM

Maybe being reared in the church has something to do with people turning towards Scientology, no?

Posted by: Pookie at December 27, 2008 9:46 AM

"Maybe being reared in the church ....."


*chuckle* *chuckle*

*snort*

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at December 27, 2008 9:58 AM

Oh, please. Cruise was almost banned from filming in Germany b/c the country recognizes Scientology as a cult.

Posted by: samantha t at December 27, 2008 11:11 AM

On a personal note, I saw a woman with four children in tow, all under the age of twelve, seat themselves at a screening of 300.

On another personal note, I saw what appeared to be a grandfather and grandmother be seated with a small child, possibly their grand daughter at Grindhouse.

On a third personal note, a mother with an IQ of a can of corn let her infant scream it's way through the last hour of the 4th Harry Potter movie I was seeing with my pre-teen daughter.

On a final personal note, I like lower back pain.

Posted by: bucslim at December 27, 2008 12:04 PM

I was already interested in seeing this, as both a history nerd and a Germany lover, so I'm glad it got a fairly positive review here.

It'll still probably be a Netflix, though.

Posted by: Gabs at December 27, 2008 12:37 PM

Wait, the Mormons have magic underpants? Why didn't I know this, and where do I sign up?

Posted by: Anna von Beaverplatz at December 27, 2008 12:37 PM

Heyooooooooooooooooo Yes! On.a.personal.note!

Posted by: Pookie at December 27, 2008 12:40 PM

I've been debating going to see this over the weekend. The Oprah-couch-remembering-devil-on-my-right-shoulder is whispering, "Netflix" while the "Magnolia"-remembering-devil-on-my-left-shoulder is saying, "Your kid is gone for the weekend...go!"

I think I should let them duke it out and then decide. My money's on the right, though.

Posted by: Wednesday at December 27, 2008 12:50 PM

On a personal note: you can basically download bestiality videos of all sorts..

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at December 27, 2008 1:07 PM

On another personal note, I personally think bestiality is a personal preference. It depends on your personality and what personnel will allow a person to peruse. Personally, I think it's for preverts.

I have to go now, my supply of Doanes Pills is running low.

Posted by: bucslim at December 27, 2008 1:18 PM

On a personal note- Tom Cruise has never appeared in a comedy with an unruly animal - think Tom Hanks in Turner and Hooch or Jim Belushi in K9. Why is this? Why is the Church of Scientology keeping our couch-jumper away from our four-legged friends? Is there a secret they're keeping from the general public?

IS TOM CRUISE GAY FOR PUGGLES?

Posted by: Withnail at December 27, 2008 1:42 PM

"Personally, I think it's for preverts..."


Personally, I see nothing with..prevertions..they are a lifestyle choice.

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at December 27, 2008 1:52 PM

The killing of the European jews was ok with Stauffenberg. How does the movie handle that? And why does your review leave this out?

Posted by: MPH at December 27, 2008 1:55 PM

I'm not down with bestiality, but I'm down with the ladies sitting on my face when they get hot. As far as the European jews go, hey, it's a war movie and somebody has to die.

Posted by: Pookie at December 27, 2008 2:12 PM

@MPH: Absolutely right.

"From the perspective of history, Operation Valkyrie was more than the sum of its individuals; symbolically, it suggested that Germany during World War II had a little more underneath the hood than the Big Evil Dictator logo emblazoned upon it."

Wrong on so many levels...

Posted by: Robert at December 27, 2008 2:29 PM

This site is a hotbed of Commie-Nazism, I've been denouncing it for years.

But does anyone believe me?

NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOooo

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at December 27, 2008 2:34 PM

I thought we were an autonomous collective.

Posted by: bucslim at December 27, 2008 2:40 PM

Speaking of Commie-Nazism, I had this German girlfriend of course and every time I did something wrong she would put me on rations.

*wink wink*

Posted by: Pookie at December 27, 2008 2:41 PM

I thought we were an autonomous collective.

Posted by: bucslim at December 27, 2008 2:40 PM

-----------------------------------------------

"collective"

See, that's the type o' shit that will get you rounded up my friend.

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at December 27, 2008 2:44 PM

Normally I love history films, but this one looks BORING. Especially because *SPOILER* Hitler doesn't die. Why would I watch Tom Cruise for two hours when I already know the ending?

Posted by: Empress of All the Russias at December 26, 2008 10:27 PM
-----------------------------------------------

Why do you think people go to the Harry Potter films? They have all read the book, they will not be surprised by anything in the movie. They go so they can bitch within their little circles of 'magical importance,' of what was done right and what from the book was left out.

If you hate Tom Cruise fine do not go, but when you say you love history movies don't you all ready know the endings in those as well? Which leads to the conclusion that you are either historically stupid or hate Tom Cruise.

Posted by: richmac at December 27, 2008 2:48 PM

I learned about this operation 16 years ago from the mini-series "War and Remembrance", an amazing production for TV worthy the $98 (Amazon). I will see Valkyrie, even with a bad review but thanks for giving me hope.

Posted by: goldend at December 27, 2008 2:52 PM

This shit should have been filmed years ago with Jürgen Prochnow as the lead.

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at December 27, 2008 2:56 PM

I don't go to Harry Potter films because I want to bitch about the differences between the book and the film. I go to meet pre-teen girls in my hippogriff costume.

Posted by: bucslim at December 27, 2008 2:57 PM

Thanks for nothing richmac, now you've ruined the movie for me and my lady friend. How about in the future when you make a comment about a movie you put in a spoiler alert as not to give away the ending?

Posted by: Pookie at December 27, 2008 3:01 PM

Want me to tell you how Passion of the Christ ends?

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at December 27, 2008 3:06 PM

Dustin - your first Bryan is spelled wrong.

So what's the word on BrYan remaking X3?

That would be nice.

Posted by: WhoWhatWhere at December 27, 2008 3:12 PM

Jurgen Prochnow? Aww shit, look at BSlim gettin all movie intensive on a motherfucker, he even put those little whatever on top of the letter u in Jurgen. You better watch out Rowles, cause BSlim coming for your job.

Posted by: Pookie at December 27, 2008 3:14 PM

I've seen Passion of the Christ so I'm safe, but please don't open your mouth about King Kong.

Posted by: Pookie at December 27, 2008 3:19 PM

That BSlim or this bslim?

Posted by: bucslim at December 27, 2008 3:50 PM

wow

*swing and a miss*

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at December 27, 2008 3:54 PM

I don't go to Harry Potter films because I want to bitch about the differences between the book and the film. I go to meet pre-teen girls in my hippogriff costume.

Posted by: bucslim at December 27, 2008 2:57 PM

-----------------------------------------------
So if they do not bow to you, you ripe their throats out?

Posted by: richmac at December 27, 2008 5:10 PM

Thanks for nothing richmac, now you've ruined the movie for me and my lady friend. How about in the future when you make a comment about a movie you put in a spoiler alert as not to give away the ending?

Posted by: Pookie at December 27, 2008 3:01 PM

----------------------------------------------
Sorry Pookie, but it was not me in this case. It was the Russian Empress last night.

Posted by: richmac at December 27, 2008 5:13 PM

Re: Children in theaters

Parents bring kids to movies because they don't have anyone else to watch them. Solution: kiddie drop-offs in movie theaters. Like the ones they have at IKEA or your gym. $10/hour/child add up.

Posted by: ciji at December 27, 2008 5:26 PM

kayla, you're an idiot. Scientology shouldn't even be considered a religion, Mormons are much less ridiculous. It's not just the alien thing, it's the money. You have to pay to join Scientology. Real religions let you join for free. And as ridiculous as Mormonism history is, their philosophies are great.

(It's not just them that hate the gays so don't even start with that, even your precious Obama won't throw them a bone. I'm fine with the gays, but it's not one specific group that hates them, so don't even bother with it.)

Scientology is a completely different species, they shouldn't even be considered a religion. Damn it Dustin, but I do agree about Cruises competence, he's very competent, but not special.

Posted by: George at December 27, 2008 8:42 PM

George - "It's not just them that hate the gays so don't even start with that, even your precious Obama won't throw them a bone. I'm fine with the gays, but it's not one specific group that hates them, so don't even bother with it."

If you are referring to me with this statement then you're off base. I'm one of those rare 21 year old black college students who just doesn't care for Obama.

Anyway - next time the pastor sends those little tithing envelopes in my mailbox or some elderly lady hands me a pamphlet I'll promise you I won't give the church a dime, mkay?

Posted by: kayla at December 27, 2008 10:02 PM

Oh Jesus, when did everyone start taking themselves so seriously here? I guess Nazis, more Nazis, pedophilia, and dead dogs really suck the fun out of things.

Posted by: Sabrina at December 28, 2008 1:42 AM

Aaand I'm pretty sure I double posted because the website is acting weird, but I can't see any new comments. Hopefully nobody will be able to see this either.

Posted by: Sabrina at December 28, 2008 1:44 AM

I, an exMormon, just had to pop in to thank you for pointing out the ridiculousness of both Scientology and Mormonism. Blegh.


It's nice to know that American religious bigotry is alive and well. I could probably say the same in other countries.

I wonder. Are many of you refusing to see the movie on the grounds that Cruise is a Scientologist? If so, I truly pity you . . . and view you with nothing but contempt.

The killing of the European jews was ok with Stauffenberg. How does the movie handle that? And why does your review leave this out?

Actually, it wasn't okay with him. The man practically considered Hitler to be the anti-Christ.

Posted by: Rosie at December 28, 2008 5:45 AM

I wonder if all the Cruise-haters who refuse to see this movie because of him are the same types that would silently admire a decent painting, then when it's revealed to have been done by, say, John Gacy jr., swear up and down that they despise it so fully that even the paint additives make them spew the black bile of wounded moral integrity.

I'm not a Cruise fan nor am I anti-Cruise - if I had to put it any way, I see him as a competent actor and a human being who probably needs some gentle psychiatric care and maybe genuine love.

So what I'm saying is this: give Cruise a break, guys. Give Cruise a hug. Feel free also to hug the pre-teen girls at Harry Potter films (with or without hippogriff costume). It's all about the love, right?

And nobody should be exempt from love. :(

Posted by: Lola at December 28, 2008 6:32 AM

Hmmm, I normally tend to agree with Pajiba reviews but have to disagree with the two latest. I loved Benjamin Button even though it was a tad long. Valkyrie was boring as shit. I have never been a big Tom Cruise fan; the only recent movie in which I was impressed by his performance was Collateral. The rest of the time his performances are just like this one - adequate but nothing to write home about.

Posted by: teresam at December 28, 2008 8:18 AM

Y'know, I don't refuse to see movies because actors in them are Scientologists, largely because I 1) I love movies, and 2) I am way too lazy to look up every damn Scientologist in Hollywood before I go see one (as I would have to if I were going to be fair about the No Scientologist's Movies rule) but -- it's not bigotry to choose not to see a movie with a Scientologist in it, it's a boycott. It's saying "Hey, I deeply disagree with this "faith" and don't wish to give money to its practitioners." Disagreeing with something doesn't make you a bigot. Not going to see a movie doesn't make you a bigot. It's the why behind your disagreement, behind your reasons for boycotting, that determine the presence of bigotry.

"I don't want to give money to people whose group has previously participated in illegal activities and who, as a group, aggressively go after outsiders whenever the group is questioned. I am disturbed by the methodology used to indoctrinate members of Scientology, and I don't want to help members of Scientology earn more money to feed back into their organization." That's not being a bigot. That's caring about where your $7.50 goes. Not caring to talk to someone because they care where their $7.50 goes seems kind of dumb.

Posted by: PaleoLithchick at December 28, 2008 10:17 AM

What I want to know is - does Tom run and cry in this movie? Either seperately or at the same time.

Posted by: Kevin Wong at December 28, 2008 6:39 PM

I don't care for Tom Cruise not because of his personal beliefs but because he plays the same goddamned character in nearly every movie. No depth, no range.

I admit to liking him in Born on the 4th of July. Everything else? Meh. Not impressed or compelled to shell out my $10 to see him try to emote.

Posted by: monkeyhateclean at December 28, 2008 11:11 PM

Who are you calling "historically stupid" Richmac?

Yes, the point of history movies is to watch a story to which you already know the end.The awfulness of Tom Cruise sapped any of my pre-existing interest in the Hitler assassination plot. (Which, by the way, I was "stupid" enough to read about in junior high)The trailer made the film out to be your typical "look at me, I'm Tom Cruise the action hero" flick, not a thoughtful historical drama.

Posted by: Empress of All the Russias at December 28, 2008 11:39 PM

I don't like Tom Cruise and have never understood his appeal. Or that of Ben Affleck, but that's another comment.
But I'm glad to hear that this movie doesn't suck because I like Kenneth Branagh, Bill Nighy, Kevin McNally and Tom Hollander. Also, I adore the Action Transvestite, Eddie Izzard.

In fact, I may actually see this movie in spite of Tom Cruise.

Posted by: Adrienne at December 29, 2008 11:03 AM

I am glad Hitler dies.

Posted by: Flea at December 29, 2008 12:27 PM

there was another wailing infant in this screening. Fortunately, that hugely rude and irresponsible father left an hour in with his infant and toddler in tow.

Jesus, why are people such asshats?*
I still can hear that baby crying (who had been crying right fucking behind me during The Return of The King) while Theoden was dying.

I can still see the whole fucking family, mom and dad and grandma and grandpa, when I turned to give them the glare of death.
Mom finally took the spawn out, the people around us clapped.

*I feel I have the right to bitch since we never took our infant, or toddler or even 10 year old to anything but animated movies until the rugrat could sit still without annoying me or the folks around us. At 16 he is now a civilised movie companion that the husband and I enjoy spending time with.

Posted by: Jules at December 29, 2008 2:26 PM

its kind of crazy how OFF your review is. Cruise stunk up the movie. i don't hate him, don't care about scientology and his personal life but he can't act. he's charismatic and good in things that lack a lot of depth. this was beyond his talents. i've heard you give bad reviews to a lot of good movies, and the fact that you gave this horrible movie such a good review speaks volumes. anybody with a brain can see how horrible tom cruise was. not only did he lack the acting chops, but he lacked stature and presence. i love the way they surrounded him with equally short actors to compensate.
if it wasn't for beautiful cinematography, costume design and a decent supporting cast. this movie would be completely intolerable.

Posted by: mjd at December 29, 2008 3:28 PM

"...the German personality: Taut, no-nonsense, and efficient." Man, that is such a tired and boring stereotype. Where's the reference to lesbian Nazi werewolf hookers or touching people's monkeys?

"So what I'm saying is this: give Cruise a break, guys. Give Cruise a hug."
I see the fear of the wrath of scientology is rearing its shrink-free little shrunken head.

"It's nice to know that American religious bigotry is alive and well. I could probably say the same in other countries. I wonder. Are many of you refusing to see the movie on the grounds that Cruise is a Scientologist? If so, I truly pity you . . . and view you with nothing but contempt."
And there's that adorable "all Americans are bigots, but I can't be because I'm not American, except I'm bigoted against Americans, but that doesn't really count because Americans are all bigots" attitude. But don't mind me, I'm just a bigoted, patronizing American, in UR village, colinizin UR brown peeplz, shoving The National Religion down your beleaguered little throat and force feeding you Whoppers with the help of my trusty Ak47--standard issue at baptism, y'all--in order to better sell them to my own brain-dead, fat-assed, illiterate, bigoted compatriots. Fuck this movie, because it's not about America, and fuck everyone who doesn't wear a 10 inch flag pin on their 9 inch American dick.

Posted by: frumpiefox at December 29, 2008 6:00 PM

Hello

I'd also like to pop in and say this:

1) The garments worn by Mormons are not magic. They merely have symbolic significance.

2) Mormons do not hate gays. But they don't endorse homosexual behavior either. There's a difference.

Sincerely,
An ex-Mormon who feels she needs to defend what she used to be devoutly a part of and hates the bullshit people make up in their acute (and often willful) ignorance.

Some of you are just retarded.

Posted by: Lady Whiskers at December 29, 2008 11:16 PM

Lady Whiskers, take it easy baby. If it were me I'd be happy if someone said I had magic underwear, in my mind that would translate into someone saying my man-hammer had magical powers. Baby you sound hot in the pants, don't let these ignorant people stop you from getting your freak on. You are one sexy sounding mama jama.

Posted by: Pookie at December 29, 2008 11:34 PM

DAMN IT! I so wanted this movie to suck but it actually seems interesting from an historical standpoint. I hate Tom Cruise...why does he have to be such a competent actor!?! RAGE!!!

Posted by: ph at December 31, 2008 2:36 PM

Colonel Claus von Stauffenberg is truly one of the great men of history. His story should be known worldwide. Not many people will risk everything to defeat evil. Not many people can even recognize it from the inside as he did.

Posted by: chuckv at December 31, 2008 6:26 PM

1) A movie set in Nazi Germany where no one even speaks German much less speaks with a German accent? I'll take a pass on that.

2) Lady Whiskers, maybe as an ex-Mormon it might dawn on you one day that homosexuals are sick of hearing about who does or doesn't endorse us. I'm not an athlete, I don't need your endorsement, cupcake.

Posted by: chriso at January 2, 2009 11:33 PM

Tom Cruise could ride to my house on a rainbow and tap dance in my kitchen while farting diamonds, and I would still not see this movie. I refuse to give Tom Cruise money. Yeah I know a $10 movie ticket isn't much. But we shouldn't fund his crazy. Enablers, man.

Posted by: Porkchop at January 3, 2009 3:09 AM

Wow, D, I'm surprised there wasn't anything remotely bitchy about the review. I was gonna skip the movie, but now I'm contemplating whether to use my free movie pass. Hmmm.... I don't know if one-eyed Tom Cruise is good enough for free shit. Dang it! I'm intrigued.

Posted by: tallulahc at January 3, 2009 3:22 PM

I refuse to watch this, and yes, it's because I can't seperate Tom Cruise's acting from his crazy cultic beliefs. Even though I wouldn't even have to pay for it.

By the way, as a German, I would've been offended it they tried to speak with any kind of German accent. It just would've ended badly, like Cate Blanchett's accent in The Good German. That was anything BUT German.
If you're British/American/Australian/etc, just speak in your mothertongue. We all know it's just a movie, trying to fake a German accent is not going to make it any more realistiv or believable.

Posted by: Vanessa at January 4, 2009 5:16 PM

And as for the wailing-infants-in-theaters-problem - I may sometimes/often disagree with the German movie rating system, but at least they mostly prevent that kind of problem. Valkyrie, for example, has a 12-rating, so if the parents accompagny them, children still have to be at least 6 to get in. And I work at the theater, there's no way I'd let anyone with a toddler into a movie like that.
Of course, that also leads to long discussions with pissed off parents that don't understand why they can't take their 8-year-old to see The Dark Knight.

Posted by: Vanessa at January 4, 2009 5:24 PM

Just wanna add that it's not really the beliefs of Scientology that I have a problem with, it's the institution of the Church. Yeah, the beliefs get made fun of (Xenu, aliens, blahblahblah), but Anonymous and others use 'CO$' as shorthand because it's the money-grubbing, list-of-enemies, Mafia-like structure of the Church itself that is troubling. Have they outright killed anyone? I don't know, but they sure as hell have let people die (check out the 'Personal Accounts' section of xenu.net).

On a personal note, I would stand in line to punch Tom Cruise in the face. It's not an official boycott, but I sure as hell didn't feel like that before he starting telling everyone that people on psychiatric meds just need a long walk and a hot bath to cure what ails 'em. I even nursed a major crush in high school. I know he's a competent actor and makes good films, but I just can't look at him the same way.

Posted by: Lizzie (greeneyed fem) at January 5, 2009 8:46 AM

I saw this yesterday, and I have to say I actually enjoyed it. But that doesn't matter. The most important thing is that I went in and realized (as a Pride and Prejudice superfan) that not only did the Mr Collins from the A&E miniseries play Hitler, but that annoying little guy who was suspicious of the people involved in the plan was played by the more recent Mr Collins from the Keira Knightely Pride and Prejudice. Hee.

Posted by: Erin S at January 5, 2009 11:27 AM

The only thing that really bothered me about this movie was seeing the Mercedes logo everywhere. The first time we see a Mercedes, it's outside a hideout or something, just a 10-second clip of that car outside that house. Then we see the same one again. And then... it's pretty much the main method of travel as Operation Valkyrie unfolds. It's the Nazimobile. I mean, Aston Martin gets Bond and Mercedes Benz gets... well... Hitler. It's effectively product placement--in reverse. But maybe not--maybe it still works. I like Mercedes and I still like Mercedes, and after seeing the film I'm thinking about certain automobiles a lot more (and the Honda Valkyrie, actually xD). But I'm just saying... my boyfriend doesn't know a thing about cars, and at the end of the movie I asked him if he could recognize a Benz, and he said yeah--just check the inside for swastikas.

Posted by: Summyre at January 7, 2009 2:23 AM

Did I get this right? Tom Hanks didn't make any embarrassing movies? This is a joke, right? What about Mazes and monsters, Big, and - need I mention it - Forrest Bloody Gump? (and probably several others, more likely than not involving Meg Ryan in some way)

Posted by: andi at January 9, 2009 8:01 PM

After ca. 12.3 seconds of thinking I decided that the Tom Hanks bit was actually a joke. Sorry to interrupt, carry on.

Posted by: andi at January 9, 2009 8:09 PM

Yet another blatant, unoriginal Hollywood rip-off of a foreign film, that being the German version, Operation Valkyrie.

As in all cases, the original is better, true to the actual records, not over acted due to bad direction with scripts acted out by wannabes and can't act actors.

Posted by: Chris at January 21, 2009 11:21 PM

Sometimes I disagree with Pajiba. But this one I totally agree with Dustin. Really good movie. As the end credit rolled in I was still sitting there digesting.

P.S. What is all this fuss about Tom Cruise - like if you want to be "in" and "fashionable", you have to think he is ridiculous, and feel guilty for going to see a movie he is in?

Posted by: Durian at February 20, 2009 12:37 PM