serial podcast / the walking dead / snl / mindhole blowers / netflix / celebrity facts / marvel

home /film / tv / lists / news / love / celeb

Using Only the Power of Great Banter, 'What If' Has Breathed New Life Into the Entire Rom-Com Genre

By Vivian Kane | Film Reviews | August 14, 2014 | Comments ()


It’s inevitable that What If will forever be called the Millennial When Harry Met Sally. You know why? Because that’s exactly what it is. This movie is quite possibly the best romantic comedy of the 2000s, or at least a solid contender for the title, which it earned not by flipping the genre on its head or by inventing new forms, but by doing the old forms really, really well. It is aggressively adorable, but very smart. Sure, it’s predictable (what, are they NOT going to end up together?) and moderately formulaic, and, yes, twee enough to include cartoon bird-women occasionally fluttering across the screen, but still centers around two characters who are undeniably charming and perfect enough for each other that you can’t help but actively root for them. This movie is fun and charming and— yes, I’ll use the dread word itself—adorable. And by embracing all those things and not fighting the genre it so solidly lives within, it manages to be a truly fantastic movie.

Wallace and Chantry (and the award for Rom-Commiest Names Ever goes to…), played to gross levels of perfection by Daniel Radcliffe and Zoe Kazan, are the quintessential movie couple. They have their meet cute: at a party, in front of the refrigerator where he’s making depressed post-breakup fridge magnet poetry. They have their kooky friends (Adam Driver and Mackenzie Davis) who double as the lust-at-first-and-every-sight, constantly grinding foils opposite which this romance plays out. Because even though these two clearly belong together (and, oh, they do — for people who love words, as I know you lot do, there’s no greater connection than the magical, easy-flowing, quick-witted banter these two have going on), they are relegated to Friendship Status. (In fact, the original title of the movie was the far superior The F Word.) And the reasons are sound for them, if not for us. Wallace is in relationship recovery, and trying a chronic cynical anti-romanticism on for size. But the real wedge between them is Chantry’s current long-term relationship with her boyfriend Ben, who is just enough of a d-bag for us to not feel bad rooting against him, but a decent enough guy that it doesn’t diminish her character for staying with him for so long. And even as we know, without a doubt, how this story will end, it’s Chantry’s unreasonably strict adherence to her moral absolute principles that keep her relationship with Wallace platonic, and drives the 100 minutes of will they/won’t they friend-struggle. Actually, in a much-needed addition to the modern romance genre, both characters’ views of relationships, and the limitations they eagerly place on themselves, are firmly rooted in the awful, infidelity-ridden relationships of their parents.

And that is where the real beauty of this movie lies. They took an existing formula, and made a real, relatable, modern story out of it. It’s tempting to hold Driver and Davis up as the Best Part of the Movie, because their tongue-filled relationship is truly wonderful, and his line from the trailer, about nachos and sex? It’s just as hilarious within the movie itself. But as sexy and hysterical and charismatic as those two are, they are not The Best. No, that title belongs to Zoe Kazan. Daniel Radcliffe is fantastic, don’t get me wrong. He is charming and quick and continuing his trend of showing us his butt until we take him seriously as a real muggle actor. But Kazan has taken the role of romantic female lead and lovingly morphed it into a real woman. This is no manic pixie dream girl. Her choices may not always be the best, but they are always with her own self in mind, and they are absolutely believable as those of a smart, romantic, possibly confused but definitely realistic 20-something woman. And yes, much of that credit is due to Elan Mastai, the screenwriter, and T.J. Dawe who wrote the play the movie is based on. They created a wonderful character, and a perfect pairing, but these are sure to be held up as career-defining performances for both Radcliffe (breaking out) and Kazan (breaking in). They’re too remarkable not to be.

Broadway's 'Aladdin' Honors Robin Williams, While Two Audience Members in 'Book of Mormon' Honor Their Own Genitalia | Elisabeth Moss Is Just Like Us and O.J. Simpson is Obsessed With Kim Kardashian

Are you following Pajiba on Facebook or Twitter? Every time you do, Bill Murray crashes a wedding.

Comments Are Welcome, Bigots and Trolls Are Not

  • Thea

    "He is charming and quick and continuing his trend of showing us his butt until we take him seriously as a real muggle actor" is my favorite line of the day.

  • Dave McIntyre, Esq.

    In Canada, the film is still called "The F Word" It's only in the US (and the UK, according to Wikipedia) that is selling this as "What If".


  • Uriah_Creep

    Vivian also neglected to mention that this film was directed by Michael Dowse, who also directed the unexpectedly delightful "Goon".

  • Classic (meadowdancer)

    Seeing this tomorrow. I need some cheer in my life right now.

  • Tinkerville

    I really need a pick-me-up after this hellish week and an adorable rom-com sounds like just the thing. Thanks for bringing this to my attention.

  • tarqueeny

    Cannot wait to see this, it's out in the UK next week. Finally.

  • Kate at June

    I want so see this, but damn if the trailer I just sought out and watched didn't give the ENTIRE plot away.

  • BWeaves

    Boy meets girl?

  • Vivianne ValdeMar

    I'm guessing you haven't watched "In Your Eyes"? Oh, wow, that came out rude. I'm sorry, it honestly wasn't meant to be. Also with Zoe Kazan in a lead role, and a script penned by Joss Whedon? I remember it being mentioned on here, but I can't seem to find a review. Seriously, watch it. For that matter, everyone should. It's beautiful, and for some reason, haunting, and touching, and magical in that brutally real fairy tale sort of way and it just kind of slipped under the radar. (Also, one of those kids I can't even remember from "Cloverfield" will floor you.) There are some things that bothered me about how some of the secondary characters were written (please don't throw things at me for criticizing Joss Whedon), but one thing I can say, is that there hadn't been a drama that wasn't rooted in reality and/or misery in years that made me spend the last 5-10 minutes with my hand over my mouth, and alternating between cheering, praying, and damn near panic attacks on behalf of fictional characters.

  • Naye

    Ruby Sparks. That is all

  • Vivianne ValdeMar

    Seen it. Liked it very much, and it also turns the manic pixie dream girl trope on its head, but "In Your Eyes" is a different beast. And one that touched me for very different reasons. A completely innocuous line, "I wish you weren't so pretty, Becky Bloom" just gutted me. I may or may not have cried, but I couldn't possibly tell you.

  • TK

    I was interested because of Radcliffe, but sold because of Zoe Kazan. Terrific review.

  • BWeaves

    I'm looking forward to this movie, but I will be calling them Wallace and Gromit.

blog comments powered by Disqus