web
counter
 

moon.jpg

Moonstruck

Under the Same Moon / Nathaniel Rogers

Film Reviews | April 9, 2008 | Comments (18)


The trailer to Under the Same Moon (La Misma Luna) held me at violin point. It threatened me with wet eyes, shameless sentiment and that tried and true art house plot staple: cute little kid melts the heart of grumpy adult during their travels together. You know the type: Kolya, Central Station, and dozens of other less successful films that get submitted for Oscar consideration in the foreign film category each year. The trailer also makes the bizarrely amnesiac claim, “Not since Cinema Paradiso has a film captured the hearts of audiences around the world.” I can’t vouch for the veracity of that statement. That’s 19 years of movies that the trailer denounces as globally unloved. Oh sure, maybe that movie you loved also captured hearts in Mexico, Norway, and Asia, but the French refused to be moved, booing it at Cannes. Or maybe something your best friend still raves about came close, with only Switzerland remaining neutral. What film is loved by the entire world in the past two decades? Only two, if you believe Fox Searchlight and the Weinstein Company. The pressure was enough to shake me more than a little, but as it turns out, this “story of the bond between mother and son that can never be broken” (gag) was more endearing than horrifying.

The opening scene uses clever crosscutting to set up the expectations that we’re seeing the first part of the story: mother and son soon to be separated. But gradually it dawns on you that they already are. Movie stories should always begin in progress, and this one has: Rosario (acclaimed Mexican actress Kate del Castillo) and her son, Carlos (young professional Adrian Alonso — this is his sixth film) are not under the same roof. They’re merely under the same moon. They look at it when they’re lonely for each other, and they circle Sundays on their respective calendars. At 10:00 a.m. each and every Sunday, Rosario will call her sweet Carlitos from a pay phone in Los Angeles, and for a precious few moments, they’ll exchange news and affection.

Unfortunately, the news is always the same. Rosario is still struggling to get a green card. She’s still working illegally trying to save up money. She still can’t risk sending for her darling boy in Mexico even after four long and lonely years apart. Carlos is turning 9 on this particular Sunday, and his relatives are getting more aggressive about stealing him away from his grandmother so that they can enjoy the relative prosperity of the fat checks Rosario sends him each month. When his grandmother suddenly dies, Carlitos — a smart, resourceful young boy — decides to take matters into his own hands. He becomes an illegal himself, smuggled to the Mexico/U.S. border under the backseat of a car driven by Marta (America Ferrara in an extended cameo).

Naturally, things get more complicated from there (I won’t spoil the plot twists). The closer that Carlos gets to a potential reunion with his mum, the higher the dramatic stakes are raised. The film, which is rather obviously but smartly divided up into eight chapters or days of the week, is briskly paced and involving. Carlos is desperate to find his mother before the following Sunday, when she’ll call and there’ll be no little boy to answer the phone. Rosario, meanwhile, running out of patience with her daily struggle, is considering entering a visa-friendly marriage she doesn’t want or even returning to Mexico herself, setting up the grotesque possibility that we’re in for an O. Henry “Gift of the Magi”-style resolution, only more tragic: Carlos at 9 years old alone in a foreign country; his mother returned to Mexico, childless.

At first, the film feels full of broad characterizations within a similarly broad-stroke framework or political issues (at one point a Spanish song that correctly posits Superman as an illegal alien plays as we see a group of Mexicans hard at work only to be attacked and arrested by police), but gradually the film deepens. The momentum of our emotional involvement is due in no small part to an able and sensitive cast. Del Castillo paints Rosario as so single-minded that her refusal to consider some rather practical solutions early in the film is maddening. But just as you begin to feel that the woman is obtuse, she adds beautiful notes of dawning realization. In the film’s last few scenes in particular you can see her awakening to new possibilities that the viewer may have given up on her noticing. She’s been revealing an embedded survival mechanism that’s no longer as useful to her as it once was, rather than dimwittedness. It’s always a joy to find actors who are ahead of you in terms of where their performance is going. In other adult roles, singer/actor Ernesto D’Alessio make a huge emotional impact in a brief role as Carlos’ biological father. And Eugenio Derbez, a popular Mexican star, adds wonderfully comic grace notes as Enrique, the reluctant and grumpy traveling companion to the little boy.

Under the Same Moon’s true success comes down to that little boy. Foreign films with child stars always feel a little suspect, but the young actor at the center of this journey film is terrific, all natural charisma and open-hearted close-ups that are free of the “look at me” precociousness that mars work by so many American child actors. (My theory is that they’ve all seen too much television, and perform rather than act). Whenever I see a film like Under the Same Moon that tugs ruthlessly on the heartstrings, I suspect I wouldn’t be able to handle its sentiment if it were an American film. Francois Truffaut backs me up on this: “We always appreciate better what comes to us from afar, not only because of the attraction for the exotic but because the absence of everyday reinforces the prestige of the work.” What he said.

I resisted, but Under the Same Moon prevailed. I swallowed the first round of lumps in my throat and I held strong against it until about halfway through, when I caved. I especially loved the way the film cuts itself off before risking overkill in the endearingly awkward city-street rhythms of its predictable but highly satisfying conclusion. The movie didn’t capture the entirety of my cold and cynical heart, but it laid claim to a good chunk of it for 106 minutes. That is to say, the comparison to the relentless eye-flooding power of Cinema Paradiso is really overdoing it, but I won’t lie to you. There’s probably surveillance video at Lincoln Plaza Cinema to prove this anyhow. I did dab my eyes several times as I exited the theater. Damn you, Carlitos, and your unbreakable mother/son love bond! You got me.

Nathaniel Rogers is a freelance writer in New York City. He is older than Penelope Cruz and younger than Nicole Kidman but ought never to be confused with Tom Cruise. He blogs daily at The Film Experience.









Each Time You Like, Share, Tweet or Stumble a Pajiba Post, An Angel Does the Paul Rudd Dance



DVD Releases 04/09/08 | Misheard Lyrics









Comments

Aw, Crap. You know, as someone whose parents live 8,000 miles away, someone who gets to talk to his parents once every two weeks and only sees them every two-three years... the fucking trailer for this almost made me cry. Seriously.

I'm giving everyone advance warning: I'll see this, and I'll be a goddamn wreck both during and afterwards.

Bastards.

Oh, and by the way? This was a stellar review. For real. Really great stuff.

Posted by: TK at April 9, 2008 1:13 PM

Awwwww ... I'll have to save this one for one of those "feel like crying" days.

Posted by: Cady at April 9, 2008 1:25 PM

I'll probably suffer the wrath of Godtopus for this...but I agree with TK. Sounds like I'll have to pick this up when it comes out on DVD. Great review.

Posted by: Manny at April 9, 2008 1:36 PM

TK thank you. although the trailer didn't make me cry so much as run screaming. But I'm glad to see have seen it at any rate.

what is it with foreign film trailers? I guess they have to simplify.

Posted by: Nathaniel R at April 9, 2008 2:08 PM

Great review! The preview hooked me when I saw Carlito's mexican-catholic haircut.

Posted by: Draya at April 9, 2008 2:15 PM

Sweet review. Must see.

Posted by: Cindy at April 9, 2008 2:18 PM

Nathaniel, I remember making fun of the trailer for this movie before Juno :) I'm glad to hear it's actually a decent film. Great review!

Posted by: Julie at April 9, 2008 2:21 PM

This just went to the top of my must-see list. Monday's always a good moviegoing evening.

Fantastic review.

Posted by: Nicole at April 9, 2008 2:24 PM

Who is Nathaniel? Dammit, I shouldn't stay away from this place for an extended period. Good review, Nathaniel (For some reason, I feel a bit like Chuck when I say this)

I'll have a problem with this film. Even if it comes on cinema, they'll have Dutch subtitles and I don't speak either of the 2 languages. You'd think 5 languages would be enough to allow you to watch most films, but no. Seems like I have to learn spanish and Chinese/Japanese/Korean. *sigh*

Posted by: joker at April 9, 2008 2:52 PM

Excellent review, and not just because I agree wholeheartedly. This movie was so adorable and saccharine and charming and I loved every second of it. But I didn't cry, and I even cry at television commercials, for serious. Huh. Guess I'm more of a cold-hearted bitch than I thought.

Posted by: Gudrun at April 9, 2008 3:01 PM

So glad, Nathaniel, that not only did you like the film but also that you appreciated it as a piece of sophisticated film-making. It's so easy to dismiss sentiment as a cinematic style but this film really shows why/how it can be great.

Posted by: StinkyLulu at April 9, 2008 7:36 PM

I have to say,I was worried this would be schmaltzy. And I knew my mother would make me see it with her, so I'm glad its not.
I know so many immigrant mothers who have left their children behind, I am sure this one will make me bawl; though I'm glad to hear it will be through true sentiment rather than manipulation

Posted by: frogirl1978 at April 9, 2008 8:42 PM

There comes one point in a person's life where they have to admit that they (used to) watch way too many telenovelas. Like when you read the review for a potentially nice movie and recognize every goddamn name mentioned, laugh your ass off because you know better than to assume the actors have ANY acting skills and begrudge your knowledge of South American television for ruining everything. Also Kate's eyebrows are distracting. At least Ernesto is eye candy, vacuumous as he might be. I need to get a life.

Posted by: Irina at April 10, 2008 1:16 AM

Irina - I totally agree about Kate's eyebrows. I just don't understand them.

Posted by: Gudrun at April 10, 2008 2:57 AM

Can't wait to see it. Its main actress is my favorite. I saw her on "w e a l t h yR o m a n c e.c o m" last week. What is she looking for on that site?

Posted by: agreeone at April 10, 2008 4:36 AM

Had to look her up on IMDB. Geez, those are some of the worst implants EVER! Way to ruin an otherwise beautiful figure.

Posted by: Ann at April 10, 2008 5:01 PM

The girl is so beautiful!I love her.Maybe many men like her,too.If you want to know her more,you would go to "SeekingRich.com".She is also
on "SeekingRich.com",there are a lot of reports about her.

Posted by: Pat at April 12, 2008 11:02 AM

Although i didnt love the film as much as you did, i think Carlitos is really great and i am wondering if he could be considered for oscar recognition at the end of the year. He certainly is the best i have seen in many years.

Posted by: John at April 14, 2008 9:55 AM