free counter with statistics Two Days in Paris | Pajiba - Scathing Reviews for Bitchy People

julie_delpy1.jpg

Stoning the Romance

2 Days in Paris / John Williams

Film Reviews | August 14, 2007 | Comments (33)


David Denby recently argued in The New Yorker that we’re suffering through a period of film romances that feature slovenly, juvenile men made whole by accomplished but essentially vacant women, and that neither gender is flattered by the trend. (The piece was pegged to
Knocked Up, and it’s hard to argue against his thesis based on that example.) But it seems to me that we’re suffering through a broader problem, which is that our romances are not romantic.

Many recent stories about couples — Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind, Shopgirl, and The Break-Up come to mind here, among others — vary wildly in tone and ambition (and quality), but all of them fixate on the dissolution of relationships without convincingly showing us that their subjects were ever really in love. 2 Days in Paris joins their ranks. It’s the directorial debut of Julie Delpy, who also wrote it, stars in it, co-produced it, sings in it, cast her parents in it, and presumably catered it, scouted locations for it, and replaced the shout of “action!” on set with a raw cry of “Delpy!”

Delpy starred in Before Sunrise and Before Sunset — co-writing the latter with director Richard Linklater — and she must have learned a lot about shooting and pacing a naturalistic story from the experiences. In some ways, 2 Days in Paris is superior to those movies. For instance, Ethan Hawke is nowhere to be seen. Instead, there’s Adam Goldberg as Marion’s boyfriend of two years, Jack. (The couple is stopping over in Paris, staying with Marion’s parents on the way back to New York from a vacation in Venice. The scenes with her folks are among the most charming in the movie.) Goldberg is tattooed, hirsute, and emotionally aggressive — the opposite of Hawke, who is pale, waxy, and always seems on the verge of asking for his blankie. And where Linklater’s mood was moony and sentimental in the Before movies, Delpy’s is clenched and spiteful, even when it’s funny. Marion spends the time in Paris aimlessly talking with other men (with the exception of two angry, public run-ins, one with an ex-boyfriend and one with a cab driver, during which her aim appears to be their dismemberment). Jack spends the time growing increasingly paranoid about Marion’s past and present exploits, culminating with the discovery of several erotic text messages from another man on her Blackberry.

The script is sharp and often witty, but there’s a pointed lack of incident here. The only thing that really happens is Jack’s realization that he and Marion aren’t right for each other, and it seems like this revelation might have dawned on both of them earlier — say, after the first or second date. Jack is a painfully needy neurotic, and Marion is the righteous type who can work herself into tears about how our overuse of toilet paper is threatening the environment but can’t seem to deeply care about the person sitting next to her.

Every critic with a pulse has compared 2 Days in Paris to the earlier work of Woody Allen, because the parallels are inescapable. But in Annie Hall, for instance, we don’t only see the bickering and the falling out of love. We see tender moments, like the scene in which Alvy and Annie wrangle the lobsters. If Jack and Marion had that kind of chemistry, we might feel more invested in their fate. I enjoyed most of 2 Days in Paris, but it left me wondering why so many young filmmakers shy away from portraying happiness, even if it’s fleeting.

In the novel High Fidelity, Nick Hornby famously asked what comes first for a music lover, sad songs or a sad life. Do we relate to sad songs because of our own heartbreak, or does a steady diet of mopey music when we’re young make it inevitable that we build romantic livesfull of error and regret? I’m 33, so pop culture has already forged my character, for better or worse, but I feel bad for younger moviegoers — love is hard enough, and they deserve to see the lobsters as well as the blowups.

John Williams lives in Brooklyn. He’s a freelance writer. He blogs at A Special Way of Being Afraid.


Pajiba Love 08/13/07 | A Real American Pajiba



Comments

"Do we relate to sad songs because of our own heartbreak, or does a steady diet of mopey music when we're young make it inevitable that we build romantic livesfull of error and regret?"

it seems to be the latter, anymore. but drama really sells, and so dramatic music about loss and despair sells.

good review!

Posted by: razh at August 14, 2007 8:36 AM

I'd watch the "Hebrew Hammer" in just about anything....except this. If I read this right it seems as if she didn't lay in a background for how they hooked up in the first place. The initial hook-up is everything. It is what will establish whether the audience will give a shit.

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at August 14, 2007 8:39 AM

Not to go off topic from this review, but I thought Eternal Sunshine did a pretty good job at countering the destruction of the relationship with some tender moments ("you're pretty, you're pretty.") I mean, it isn't clear what the characters see in each other, true. But it wasn't all being pissed at each other over cold chinese food.

Posted by: tigi at August 14, 2007 10:31 AM

Arrrrghhh! Ironic Michael Douglas/Kathleen Turner reference! Must get adrenalin syringe for heart . . . can't lose consciousness . . . must not hear Eddy Grant theme music . . . .

*dies*

Still rooting for you, Adam. Shabbat Shalom, motherfuckers.

Posted by: socalledonlycousins at August 14, 2007 10:37 AM

Do you really think that Eternal Sunshine didn't show us why the couple was in love in the first place? I wholeheartedly disagree. Knocked Up, while funny as hell, definitely falls victim to that though.

Posted by: Drew at August 14, 2007 11:09 AM

Two things:
1. Yea!! The presence of Julie Delpy means I do not have to enter into a round of bargaining with Mr. PaddyDog the likes of which would make the UAW look like pussies, along the lines of "I'll go to a hundred flicks where hordes of men kill each other violently if you accompany me to this one film written by a chick about a break-up" (I'm still on a major deficit because of The Hours). Thank you Julie for making this weekend so much easier.

2. I'm fine with not seeing the happy moments. I think it's more realistic that way. Relationships are invariably uneven so break-ups almost always result in one extremely upset person who can't let go and one extremely irritated person who can't wait to let go. These feelings pretty much erase the warm glow of the good times and infuse them with bitterness, so we rarely do remember accurately why we got together in the first place.

Posted by: PaddyDog at August 14, 2007 11:14 AM

I have yet to forgive Julie Delpy for An American Werewolf in Paris. And the Hebrew Hammer wasn't half as funny as Goldman thought it was. That said though, he is pretty talented when he's not overplaying himself, and she can be downright luminous. But it seems like this might be trying too hard for the "oh, love is so DIFFICULT" thing, which is getting somewhat tiresome.

Posted by: TK at August 14, 2007 11:39 AM

And, of course, I meant Adam Goldberg.

Crap.

Posted by: TK at August 14, 2007 11:41 AM

To be honest, I've only ever seen "Eternal Sunshine" once, because like Dustin Rowles, I wanted to forget all the details before experiencing it again. In spite of that, however, I remember my initial impression and how it made me feel, which is that "Eternal Sunshine" was not a movie about a happy couple turned bitter but about a union between two people whose deep disturbances happened to be at opposite poles, leading to inevitable attraction within the right proximity. I don't think that there were many happy moments to show, not in the traditional washing-the-dog, pillow-fight, sharing-a-milkshake way of sub-par rom-coms. For Clementine and Joel, the happy moments would have been the quiet ones, where she wasn't leading him in circles and his paranoia wasn't lashing out. And the happy moments weren't all-important anyway, because in the end, it was re-living both the good times and bad that made him realize that he wasn't ready to let her go yet. It's growth on his part because, to me, Joel started off as a romantic in the Russian style, trying to redeem himself through the love of someone who needed saving, and turned into a realist, who came to understand that a failed relationship is not a worthless one.

Posted by: Geetch at August 14, 2007 12:13 PM

Didn't that other Paris direct-to-DVD movie have the same name as this?

Posted by: Brian at August 14, 2007 12:41 PM

oh god,there surfaces high fidelity once again.

now i HAVE to read it.

Posted by: al at August 14, 2007 1:07 PM

oh god,there surfaces high fidelity once again.

now i HAVE to read it.

Posted by: bill at August 14, 2007 1:08 PM

good review

Posted by: dflood at August 14, 2007 1:22 PM

Brian, that was 'One night in Paris'. Don't ask me how I know that.

Posted by: heatdamaged at August 14, 2007 1:48 PM

Great review, and very funny. I totally agree, especially about the lobsters. I think maybe it has something to do with authenticity. Writers/directors--especially young ones--feel an urge to prove to the audience and themselves that they have soul--that they are SERIOUS artists. Pain, I think, seems (SEEMS) a more profound, 'artistic' emotion.

I also think it's extremely difficult to portray happiness/joy without it seeming sentimental and treacly. "Must Love Dogs" (forced on me against my will several nights ago) springs to mind here. Like a tumor, continuing to metastasize. MAN that was a bad movie.

But I digress.

Posted by: Tim at August 14, 2007 1:56 PM

not in the traditional washing-the-dog, pillow-fight, sharing-a-milkshake way of sub-par rom-coms

Precisely why I loathe rom-coms (and that damn abbreviation too), and why I loved Eternal Sunshine. Probably why I found that movie so profoundly sad and tragic, because what they had was more like real life.

This movie, however, sounds a bit grating. I never saw either of the Sunset movies, mostly because of pansy-boy Ethan Hawke, but Julie Delpy doesn't do much for me either. I like Adam Goldberg, but not when he's insufferable, which it sounds like he is here.

Posted by: katy at August 14, 2007 2:02 PM

A (somewhat) recent film that is genuinely romantic even if its characters aren't your average romantic comedy characters is Punch-Drunk Love. The scenes are all beautifully filmed and the music is amazing.

Posted by: hebrewhammer at August 14, 2007 2:54 PM

Ha, Katy, I hate the expression "rom-coms" too, but I think it's applicable to a particular type of romantic comedy: the crappy ones that are short on both true romance and good comedy.

Posted by: Geetch at August 14, 2007 3:03 PM

Not to needlessly hop on the Eternal Sunshine-loving train, but that film most definitely showed moments of happiness between the lead couple, especially when they were lying on the ice together and when they were pretending to suffocate each other with pillows etc. etc.

It's one of the most romantic movies ever made.

Posted by: Astrid at August 14, 2007 3:52 PM

Not to be overly sensitive, but I take issue with this:


It's the directorial debut of Julie Delpy, who also wrote it, stars in it, co-produced it, sings in it, cast her parents in it, and presumably catered it, scouted locations for it, and replaced the shout of "action!" on set with a raw cry of "Delpy!"


I don't see what relevance that has to the rest of your review whatsoever. I think Delpy should be applauded for getting a movie made in a male-dominated industry that seems so hell-bent on forcing women into recycled, sexy, brainless roles. Men are usually applauded for being the creative handler for movies where the write/direct/star, but when a woman does it it's insane? I'm not sure I understand.


She's done something very few women have, and I think mocking her over taking control is a pretty low blow, especially when I can usually count on Pajiba to be lady-friendly.

Posted by: Maddie at August 14, 2007 4:04 PM

And, of course, I meant Adam Goldberg.

Crap.

Posted by: TK at August 14, 2007 11:41 AM

****************************************************

Nice try but ultimately futile, I'm telling...

Yup, that's a paddlin'

VERMILLION!!!

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at August 14, 2007 4:11 PM

Maddie: Blame Nora Ephron. As Hollywood's leading chick writer/director, she is reponsible for delivering an entire oeuvre of recycled sexy brainless roles based on the fact that a woman can't live without a man, and unfortunately an awful lot of women tend to go to the cinema to see recycled sexy brainless roles. And don't anybody come back yelling Silkwood at me. She lost any Silkwood cred with the "stalking is really cute if I know in my heart he's for me" piece of excrement that is Sleepless in Seattle.

Posted by: PaddyDog at August 14, 2007 4:29 PM

Maddie - You are absolutely right. You are being over-sensitive. It was a joke, and he would have made the exact same joke had it been a man who had assumed all of those duties. I swear, people must actively look for things to get offended by.

Barbado - nobody likes a tattletale. You are cruisin' for a bruisin', buddy.

Posted by: TK at August 14, 2007 4:50 PM

Maddie: I don't see how that statement had anything to do with Delpy's gender. Not a single part of it points to some issue with a female making the film; the joke was about the level of involvement she had in it. It would still be funny if the subject was male. I have to disagree with PaddyDog about Ephron, merely because the joke needs no such defense.

BarbadoSlim: Too much tattlin': that's a paddlin'.

Posted by: Vermillion at August 14, 2007 4:55 PM

Writing almost the same post as me (and apparently hijacking my brainwaves)?

Oh, you better believe that's a paddlin'.

Posted by: TK at August 14, 2007 4:57 PM

I just want to duck in very briefly to say that I have absolutely no problem with Delpy assuming all that control (in fact, I'm looking forward to whatever she does next).

And I really liked Eternal Sunshine a lot -- but I never felt the romance between them. Maybe that's just me. To me, that movie was about an essentially miserable relationship, and how much we forget about that when we miss something/feel that we need it back/etc. When they're listening back to the tape and the recorded him makes fun of her hair (in a trenchant way) and in person he says, "I like your hair" -- that's one of the best moments in any movie, ever.

OK, this wasn't so brief. Apologies.

Posted by: JMW at August 14, 2007 5:24 PM

Threatenin' the paddler with a paddlin': that's a paddlin'.

Posted by: Vermillion at August 14, 2007 6:36 PM

She's done something very few women have, and I think mocking her over taking control is a pretty low blow, especially when I can usually count on Pajiba to be lady-friendly.

Um, what? Sorry to pile on, Maddie, but there's nothing objectively gender-related about that comment -- unless you're telepathic and JW is secretly thinking something nefarious, there's nothing un-lady-friendly about the review. Delpy, who is awesome, decided to do something that might result in being mocked, i.e., direct a film. She then did it in a somewhat mockworthy manner, i.e., becoming a control-freak and engaging in a little good-ol'-fashioned nepotism. Any man -- except Nathan Fillion -- would have received the same treatment on this site. The epitome of equality is taking the bad with the good.

Posted by: socalledonlycousins at August 14, 2007 7:41 PM

Being happy and sincere has become uncool. Shame really.

My husband and I had a conversation last night that started with a Kate Bush music video. We watched the video for Wuthering Heights a couple of times on my friend's facebook page, and we when we got over laughing our arses off at some interpretive dance, we realised how happy and sincere she seemed at doing her interpretive dance, (and that actually she was really good at it) and how it's become crippling uncool to be happy and sincere,to be romantic, to be daring, to be flushed with feeling and unconcerned that feeble minded folk may find your happiness funny and uncool. We don't need schmaltz but we do need gleeful, joyful, romantic happiness, in love and in life.

Posted by: Rebecca H. at August 15, 2007 4:37 AM

I am indifferent to Deply, so I might catch this through Netflix.

I'd like to add another recommendation for a good Rom-Com and that is Next Stop Wonderland. Starring the lovely Hope Davis with Phillip Seymore Hoffman and Callie Thorne (Shelia from Rescue Me).

I think Maddie has been sufficiently reprimanded. As a female with a college degree I understand the knee-jerk reaction to think that a man is trying to belittle a woman for success, but sometimes it is an overreaction.

Posted by: lickoriche at August 15, 2007 12:22 PM

one iris murdoch's character said that for a writer, the most difficult thing to describe was falling in love and the state of being in love. I think that's true and that this is the reason why it is so much easier to film cutesy cheesy moments than real emotions.
the most realistic "falling in love" movie i've seen recently was Prime. and although the movie has some serious short-comings, the romance part seemed real and uma and the guy from one tree hill really had good on-screen chemistry.
and seeing the whole process of a romance made you actually care for the characters.

Posted by: marija at August 16, 2007 3:15 AM

This is late, but I just got back from it. I thought it was fantastic. Maybe it was my mid-range expectations, but I thought everything in this film worked. The vegan guy was great!

Posted by: Kevin Longrie at September 15, 2007 10:01 PM

Okay, I have to go see this movie in about an hour with my girlfriend, so I decided to check the review. After reading the review and subsequent comments, I think it's important to just mention the following:

Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind is not a romantic comedy or romance movie.

Yes, there are relationships in it. It uses a romance, or rather a failed romance, as a vehicle to deal with the notion of the sub-conscious and how we deal with difficult memories and so forth, and our relationships with ourselves more than the people around us. It's tragic at the beginning and it has a tragic soundtrack, i guess, and some of the characters are sad, but it isn't tragic. It's got a happy ending, for crying out loud.

All I'm saying is just because a movie has a guy and a girl in it and by the end they hook up or get involved in a relationship together doesn't mean it's a romance or romantic comedy.

If you want a good romance movie, see Moonstruck. Cher and Nicholas Cage. Way back when Danny Aiello wasn't all, well, he was old and brutish then too but damn it that's a romance for ya.

That is all.

Posted by: squashbag at November 2, 2007 4:31 PM