blogspot
visitor
TV Set, The | Pajiba - Scathing Reviews for Bitchy People

tvset2.jpg
When the Whistle Blows, Everything Falls Apart

The TV Set / Daniel Carlson

Film Reviews | April 23, 2007 | Comments (17)


“There aren’t evil guys and innocent guys. It’s just … a bunch of guys.” — Steve Arlo (Ben Stiller), Zero Effect

Writer-director Jake Kasdan knows a thing or two about making good TV, and what it’s like to get screwed around by Hollywood. His debut feature, Zero Effect, was laced with a kind of bizarre, often low-key humor that dared its audience to come along for the ride: This is the way things are going to be, Kasdan seemed to be saying, and anyone who doesn’t want to play along can kindly just jog on. He helmed a few episodes of the critically praised but largely overlooked “Freaks and Geeks” and “Grosse Pointe,” and was on the verge of going legitimately mainstream when he took the reins on Orange County. But that film was a Mike White script meant to showcase Jack Black; Kasdan’s work was capable, but really, there’s not much any director can do with Black drumming on his belly. No, Kasdan is at his most confident when he’s working on his own material, which is why The TV Set is such a sharp and often hilarious satire of the life of a Hollywood TV writer struggling to find a balance between sharing his vision with the world and compromising with the suits so that his vision might actually be shared and not discarded like literally thousands of other pilots. If anything, Kasdan’s film is in danger of being what one of his network lackeys calls “a little too hip for the room”: The TV Set is rapid-fire inside baseball, from the ins and outs of pilot season and the upfronts down to below-the-line crew, a kind of aesthetically authentic look at production that makes “Studio 60 on the Sunset Strip” seem like just a saccharine hour of pseudo-reality shoehorned around its creator’s sanctimonious monologues (which, well, is the truth). The film’s sad depiction of the realities of the writing life are overwhelming, but The TV Set isn’t a Network-level melodrama, which both limits its audience appeal but guarantees that those who stay, those who go along for another of Kasdan’s rides, will be again rewarded. It’s a damn fine film, and deserves to be seen by pretty much everyone. But will it be? Not a chance. There’s just a little too much honesty here.

The film opens with Mike (David Duchovny), the harried writer at the center of everything, nervously conferring with Alice (Judy Greer) outside the Panda Network offices where they’re about to audition the final leads for “The Wexler Chronicles,” Mike’s pilot script. Duchovny is as un-leading-man as he can get here, sporting a thick beard he keeps neurotically scratching, as well as a slight beer gut. Mike is rooting for T.J. (Simon Helberg) to make the cut as the lead in the autobiographical script, but the network favors Zach (Fran Kranz), a bland, empty goofball who probably became an actor because it seemed easier than getting a real job. Zach’s gift is the kind of broad “humor” that brutally murders each joke, much like the over-the-top manager Ricky Gervais would up playing on his show within a show on “Extras” this season; it goes without saying that the network will fawn all over Zach, and that this will only be the first of many battles Mike wages with the executives who hold his career in their ignorant hands. The auditions unfold fairly quickly and with no musical cues behind them: Kasdan’s emphasis on crafting a realistic world is near absolute, and except for some of the more inane (yet eerily life-like) statements uttered by the network execs, the film often feels like a documentary that’s been re-enacted by actual stars. Chief among those execs is network head Lenny (Sigourney Weaver), a slightly ditzier but no less talented or soulless version of Faye Dunaway’s Diana Christensen in Network. Lenny is a master at the kind of corporate doublespeak that fuels the industry: “I love it just the way it is, but what if we changed this,” etc. She’s willing to go with Mike’s choice for the female lead, the down-to-earth Laurel (Lindsay Sloane), but insists on Zach in order for the show to go forward. But Mike’s got an ally in Richard (Ioan Gruffudd), a recent transplant from the BBC who’s getting a baptism by fire in his first go-round with American television. Richard is talented but also committed to producing quality programs, which is why he champions Mike’s script through the production process. The fact that Mike has someone at the network on his side makes for a slightly more complex drama than if it were merely one man against the machine, but Kasdan’s decision to make Richard British is a bit of a cop-out: The implication (actually pretty plainly stated several times) is that British programming has an edge over American in quality, and while there’s definitely an argument to be made there — the best comedy on American TV right now, “The Office,” is an adaptation of a British one — it would have been far more dynamic if one the Panda exec with good taste was American. As it is, we have no way to save ourselves but to look for help across the ocean. Kasdan also overlooks that the Brits also gave us the inspiration for “American Idol,” so perhaps it’s immature to paint them as saviors of the medium.

The rest of the narrative follows Mike’s uphill battle to shepherd the pilot through production, from Zach’s off-key acting to an absentminded director (Willie Garson), all the while constantly dealing with Lenny’s grinning insistences on changing more and more details of the script. The crux of the drama is Mike’s slowly eroding will, and the way he begins to rationalize the tweaks he’s making to his passion project. He’s caught between holding true to his vision and making the compromises that will likely increase the show’s odds of getting picked up for the fall schedule, which will help Mike and his wife, Natalie (Justine Bateman), who are about to have their second child. At one point in the editing process, Mike gets fed up and fires off an angry impromptu speech to Alice: “It’s not Shakespeare. … It’s not ‘The Sopranos,’ but it’s my show.” He rants that he doesn’t want to “pump shit into people’s living rooms” and be responsible for “making the world more mediocre.” In a film full of blatant honesty, the speech still stands out as a heartfelt plea from a writer-director wondering how he can possibly survive doing what he wants to do when he’s being forced to sell short his artistic vision at every turn. Duchovny’s voice typically hovers around a pleasant monotone, but he actually gets angry in this little diatribe, and Mike’s plaintive wish just to make a good show is heartbreaking.

Duchovny’s performance is welcome proof that he can do dramatic work beyond “The X-Files,” and his top-notch turn is matched by everyone around him. Weaver’s Lenny (the role was originally written for a man) is brilliant in her one-track addiction to crafting the perfect fall schedule for the upfronts, but she’s never too extreme to lapse into parody; rather, Kasdan’s believable dialogue keeps her firmly rooted in satire, where everything is just barely believable. It’s crazy, but not too crazy. And while Sloane is also dead-on as the weary ingĂ©nue, Kranz is surprisingly engaging as Zach. Kranz is talented enough to convincingly portray a bad actor, and Zach’s occasional good performances are that much more special for their infrequency. It’s a little weird to see an actor playing a bad actor so convincingly, as if he’s tipping the union’s collective hand on what it takes to hit the marks in boilerplate TV dramas; the same thing happened when Edward Norton played a con man feigning mental retardation in The Score, eternally casting doubt on the “skill” it takes for an actor to tackle the role of a handicapped person. But Kranz is great in the role, and some of Zach’s performances are joyously excruciating to watch.

There’s a lot to love in The TV Set: Kasdan’s script is downright witty, and runs a compact 90 minutes, just enough to make its point without getting bogged down or overstaying its welcome. Aside from a few slightly broader moments of its own, the film’s humor is the kind of accomplished and razor-edged writing that’s far too infrequent in a Hollywood increasingly turning out product aimed at 12-year-olds. If anything, Kasdan’s film is too good at what it does — making the obvious point that TV is pretty much a creative wasteland — to bring anything totally original to the scene. But it’s still fascinating to watch Mike navigate the increasingly murky waters of his chosen profession as he questions what it means to be true and just how far you can go before you sell out. In a way, Mike is the spiritual descendant of Bill McKay, Robert Redford’s idealistic politician in The Candidate; it’s not just whether Mike can stay true to himself, but if he really wants to. The TV Set sure won’t change anyone’s mind about the quality of modern television, whether they love or hate it, but as a testament to one man’s hellish time in the network trenches, it’s fantastic. Now if we could just get Kasdan a steady TV gig.

Daniel Carlson is the managing editor of Pajiba and a low-level employee at a Hollywood industry magazine. You can visit his blog, Slowly Going Bald.


Hot Fuzz | So, What's In Your Queue?





Comments

Excellent. I've been wanting to see this for a long time. I'd actually forgotten about it until I saw this :P

Posted by: Apricots at April 23, 2007 8:13 AM

As a total production geek, I am really excited for this. Plus, David Duchovny. I just hope it actually makes it to a theater here in the Heartland for a week.

Posted by: greentara at April 23, 2007 9:44 AM

You Pajiba guys were the only reason I ever heard of 'Zero Effect' and damn was that a great movie. I will definitely go see this one.

Posted by: twig at April 23, 2007 12:51 PM

Wow. I'm glad to see DD get some work that is isn't pseudo-sci fi or hapless romantic lead. This sounds really good.

Posted by: bonnie at April 23, 2007 1:02 PM

This movie looks awesome. I may even have to venture out to the theater for it!

Posted by: litelysalted at April 23, 2007 1:09 PM

Nice shout out to Edward Norton and the Score!

Posted by: Ben at April 23, 2007 2:16 PM

It's curious to me that David Duchovny has not done better with his career. I was only a middling fan of The X-Files, but he almost always impressed me as being really good in the show and the movie. He phoned in that one season, fo' shizzle, but rebounded pretty strongly in the film.

What is it with DD and so many promising actors? A bad eye for scripts and directors? An agent without a good sense of the right projects? Bad luck? I don't get it. Even considering hindsight, nearly all of DD's choices seem like they could have been predicted as likely mistakes by skilled representation.

Posted by: socalledonlycousins at April 23, 2007 3:33 PM

Anyone else think that Duchovny looks quite a bit like the late John Ritter in that picture?

Posted by: bartap at April 23, 2007 3:33 PM

God this movie was so good. I saw it at Santa Barbara International Film Festival. Kasdan wanted everyone to know that he "wishes it was satire." Haha

Posted by: Kevin Longrie at April 23, 2007 4:20 PM

I'm so glad this movie turned out to be a good one. When I saw the trailer the first time I was excited that Sigourney Weaver and David Duchovny were in a movie together and that the movie looked like it might not suck too much. This movie could have gone too far in either the comedy or tragedy direction, but it sounds like it struck the right balance. I can't wait to see it.

Posted by: stardust savant at April 23, 2007 5:41 PM

bartap: Yes! Never having heard of "The TV Set", I actually wondered if this was some very belated posthumous release of something Ritter did before reading the review -- although the effect was probably deepened by HBO showing "Stay Tuned" just last night.

Posted by: p. at April 23, 2007 6:38 PM

It's a damn fine film, and deserves to be seen by pretty much everyone. But will it be? Not a chance. There's just a little too much honesty here.

This, like everything on your site, is depressingly accurate. These same words could be applied to this site as well.

It's sad to think that this is the state of our entertainment today, that people flock to see mindless drivel and avoid honesty at all cost. I don't believe there is anything inherently wrong with entertainment, but when it doesn't have any substance and only exists as entertainment, it loses its worth and just becomes distraction. Thanks again for having the testicular fortitude to speak the ugly truth.

Posted by: CarpePancakes! at April 23, 2007 7:34 PM

I have been looking forward to seeing this movie! I was a big X files fan but skipped over most of DD's work because he can often be so...bland...

I'm glad you guys gave this one the thumbs up!

Posted by: Kait at April 23, 2007 7:36 PM

You had me at "Duchovny".

Posted by: greer at April 23, 2007 8:11 PM

This looks absolutely great. I hope it crosses the pond. Thanks for the helpful review, Daniel.

Posted by: MJ at April 24, 2007 6:33 PM

If it's any consolation, here in the UK we lament about the quality of our limp dramas compared to their US counterparts.

Of course, like you, we're probably just importing the selected highlights: House, West Wing, ER, Sopranos...you get the the picture.

p.s. We're sorry about Simon Cowell and his bloody awful show.
We're really, really sorry.

Posted by: Simon B at April 26, 2007 8:54 AM

Saw this movie earlier today. Great review for great movie. You are totally spot on. Only one tiny tiny nit to pick... Chloe was Richard's wife. Natalie was Mike's wife, I believe.

[Yowza. Thanks for the catch. I blame IMDb for listing the two actresses next to each other in the cast list. Crazy interwebs. -- D]

Posted by: AllieCat at May 6, 2007 10:09 PM





Video ads popping up after each page view? Try clearing your browser's cookies.