web
counter
 

Form Without Function

By Steven Lloyd Wilson | Posted Under Film Reviews | Comments (72)



Thumbnail image for tron_legacy.jpg

Tron is a visual masterpiece. It is also inexplicably derivative and boring.

The funny thing is that the best parts of the movie are in the first half hour, before the characters even get to the world inside the computers. It’s got the wonderful setup of Flynn disappearing in the middle of the night and his son Sam growing up to become something of an anarcho-libretarian hacker even while living off of his controlling stock in Encom, his Dad’s company grown into an obvious Microsoft analog. And because the strength of capitalism is that it systematically coopts any revolutionary impulse into being part of the system, we get to have Disney pictures make a film spouting the hacker ethos of information needing to be free even while Mickey stays out of the public domain until the sun burns to a cinder. Irony aside, the set up portion of the film works.

Then we go into the machine and we marvel at how boring beautiful things can be. The CGI is absolutely breathtaking. You want to simply explore and meander through this world of black and neon, where the rules don’t quite work the same as those in our world. Ever played with a video game’s raw rendering engine? It creates beautiful things, and you raptly manipulate and play with the constructed world. For about ten minutes, until you get bored because there’s no story, not even a nominal point to what you’re doing. That is how Tron: Legacy feels.

Flynn sets out to build a system, the perfect system. That system is apparently nothing but a bunch of fancy visual effects. Sure there are tons of programs, and they stroll around tech noir streets with glowing lines on their clothes, but someone forgot to tell the screenwriters the definition of a program: it’s computer code that does something. As far as the film is concerned, Flynn is not a computer programmer, he is a graphics designer. He waves his hands and pretty stuff exists. That’s fine. Pretty stuff is nice. But if there’s no function under the form, it’s just visual masturbation.

“You actually did it,” Sam intones breathlessly at one point. Did what? Built the grid. What’s the grid? The system. What’s the system? Everything, man. The director apparently told Jeff Bridges to channel The Dude in any scene where actual exposition takes place.

The entire film plays like a dumbed down version of The Matrix. For all its half-baked philosophy, The Matrix at least was about that philosophy underneath. The special effects served the story. Sure, you might have scoffed at that philosophy because you totally took philosophy 101 and rocked the hell out of that B-, but the effects existed to explore that philosophy. Tron: Legacy has no philosophy. It has no story. Sam gets into the machine, finds his dad, and then they try to get to the exit. Oh there’s plenty of things happening on the screen (one can tell because there are faux-pixellated explosions and very much serious seriousness on the part of the actors), but none of it means anything. There is no character advancement, there is no learning, there is no questioning. Go to A, go to B, go to C. Game over.

Look, it’s not an atrocious movie (I doubt anything could top Skyline in that department), but it falls far short of every expectation other than how nifty the effects are. It’s entertaining enough if all you want is to look at the pretty pictures and shut off your brain for two hours. But with a quality cast, quality effects, and one monumental budget, you think they would have bothered to write a script worth bothering to go to all the trouble.

Steven Lloyd Wilson is a hopeless romantic and the last scion of Norse warriors and the forbidden elder gods. His novel, ramblings, and assorted fictions coalesce at www.burningviolin.com. You can email him here.









Each Time You Like, Share, Tweet or Stumble a Pajiba Post, An Angel Does the Paul Rudd Dance



"How Do You Know" Review | Go Sell Crazy Somewhere Else | The (Sh)It List, The Olivias, and Oscar Gladiator Games | The Weekly Murdertank









Comments

I already have tickets to see this in IMAX tonight. Good to know my 17 bucks will be wasted. *sigh*

Posted by: The_wakeful at December 17, 2010 1:37 PM

"we get to have Disney pictures make a film spouting the hacker ethos of information needing to be free even while Mickey stays out of the public domain until the sun burns to a cinder"

I lol'd at this. We're up for another copyright extension pretty soon but as long as Disney lobbyists are around, Steamboat Willie will never enter the public domain.

Posted by: THRILLHO at December 17, 2010 1:43 PM

Boo! I was so looking forward to this. Not I'm vacillating about even going to the theater to see it; there are so many other things out there that seem good, and after being burned by the Matrix sequels, I don't know if I can take that kind of disappointment again.

Posted by: leuce7 at December 17, 2010 1:45 PM

Now* I'm vacillating. Ugh.

Posted by: leuce7 at December 17, 2010 1:46 PM

Sounds *EXACTLY* like the first one.....which had a terrible script, dialogue, pacing or environment that made any sense. That film got by on chutzpah and visuals.....and sort of became legendary WAY after the fact. I imagine some lower and more realistic expectations will enhance my viewing.

Posted by: zedd at December 17, 2010 1:48 PM

I just watched the original Tron this past weekend again. I forgot how bad it actually was. With that fresh in my mind to compare to, Tron: Legacy will be amazing.

Posted by: Paultera at December 17, 2010 1:57 PM

I was at the 3D IMAX last night and I enjoyed the movie. CGI Jeff Bridges scared me a little but whatever...The Dude Abides.

However, I have to disagree about only the first half-hour being fun....Daft Punk randomly showing up in the middle as themselves what hilarious and their music at 12,000watts on IMAX was mad fun!

Posted by: Luke at December 17, 2010 2:00 PM

"The director apparently told Jeff Bridges to channel The Dude in any scene where actual exposition takes place."
I'm totally ok with that. The review is spot on but my contention would be that the second half of the movie functions pretty well as a long chase scene. I don't think that anyone will be disappointed if they see the movie. Its entertaining.

Posted by: Duke Alexandrio at December 17, 2010 2:03 PM

nope, (plugs ears)lalalalalalalalalalalalalalaaaaa...,
can't hear you!
i'm seein it anyway!!!
so there! pffftt!

Posted by: Sly D. at December 17, 2010 2:12 PM

Watched the original and the new Tron back to back last night. The original was TERRIBLE and yes that made the new Tron look so much better.

Honestly, the new Tron is not that bad, sure the plot is simplistic, but it's mostly a popcorn movie anyway. Were you expecting Philip K. Dick? I think not. So just enjoy the graphics eyegasm and Daft Punk, it's not like you'll be paying much attention to anything else.

Posted by: Vi at December 17, 2010 2:21 PM

Kevin Flynn was "The Dude" way before Jeff Lebowski ever was.

Was the story super simplified and over expositioned? Sure. But the last I checked Tron: Legacy was a frakin' Disney film. I loved it.

Posted by: madjackdeaon at December 17, 2010 2:22 PM

The only reason for the second review of this in the local free paper was that the second reviewer didn't think the first reviewer's abysmal review was vicious enough.

Goddamn it. Storytelling isn't that hard.

Posted by: twig at December 17, 2010 2:22 PM

Over 600 words and not one of them was "Olvia" or "Wilde" or "skin-tight" or "naked".

How do I know if I want to see the movie if you never mention those things, SLW? HOW?!

Posted by: RobP at December 17, 2010 2:26 PM

eh, it just does what Avatar did last year: create a visually soaring, cripple scripted amalgam of technology and humanity. I thought it was pretty and the 3D was actually successful. Not over used and not horrible to the eyes. There are a few scenes where they play with the idea of video game physics, as opposed to real world, that are pretty fucking awesome. The light vehicles (bikes, planes) are honestly the tits. Also, Olivia Wilde makes my wangwang go bing bong.

Posted by: adam at December 17, 2010 2:26 PM

How was the music? Is this one of those times I should buy the soundtrack but not bother with the film?

Posted by: DarthCorleone at December 17, 2010 2:27 PM

Goddamn it. Storytelling isn't that hard.

Posted by: twig at December 17, 2010 2:22 PM


And... now I can discount every one of your posts in the future. Thanks!

Posted by: RobP at December 17, 2010 2:29 PM

RobP,

If fanficcers with day jobs and families can crank out amazing fic from ridiculously stupid sources as a hobby, it would seem that people who get paid money to do nothing else but write could get from A----->B in an interesting, entertaining manner over the span of eighteen years.

Posted by: twig at December 17, 2010 2:53 PM

This exactly reflects my own feelings. For the first twenty minutes or so I was enjoying it, it was quite sweet and nostalgic with lots of nods to the first film and then as soon as theyr'e on the grid I completely lost interest. It's sooooo dull. All the characters just spout weird technobabble at each other which no amount of pretty can make up for. Michael Sheen is only there for about 5 minutes (booo) and the only actor who emerges relatively unscathed is surprisingly Olivia Wilde who is actually charming. Garrett Hedlund is easy on the eye but his character just walks around spewing cliches. I was fighting to stay awake and considering I watched The Girl Who Kicked The Hornet's Nest right after -which is almost 3 hours long and in swedish- and managed to not only stay awake but enjoy the heck out of it I can only blame Tron. Also why is it even called Tron? Surely it should be Flynn or The Grid? You might as well watch Binary code for two hours.

Posted by: Katie at December 17, 2010 3:06 PM

So, somehow the original TRON program survived Y2K without being turned off and reprogrammed for a 4 digit year? Given that computer software has a shelflife that makes fruitflies seem octogenarian, how was daddy still stuck in the computer program? Oh, wait. I'm overthinking this again, aren't I?

Posted by: BWeaves at December 17, 2010 3:07 PM

Yes. Yes you are.

Posted by: elsie at December 17, 2010 3:22 PM

I don't see any mention of the music. At all. None.

What the hell? Did anyone at any point care about anything besides the music and the pretty visuals? Bring a joint, and stop pretending there needs to be a story.

Posted by: Sam at December 17, 2010 4:08 PM

Yeah, how could you not mention that Michael Sheen has some sort of camptastic role? I saw him on Craig Ferguson and they showed a clip from Tron that MS was actually IN, and it was... bizarre. I think he was channeling Mugatu or something.

Also, yes, Olivia Wilde is in this, but this fucker's rated PG. PG, full stop. No titz. Not even "sexual situations". {sad trombones}

Posted by: MM at December 17, 2010 4:23 PM

Twig:

First of all, they didn't work on the script for 18 years. That's just silly.

Secondofly, there are a few fanfic writers who are professional writers, or who are working to be professional writers. They do it because they love the craft and want the practice. They also aren't under the thumb of any studios or editors.

Third, writing is god damn hard, you sonovabitch. Your favorite authors might make it look easy, but it's not. Like making a chair. Sure, you get four legs, a base, and a back and boom. You got yourself a chair goin'. But you and I both know there's more to it than that, just like there's more to writing than A---->B.

Writers deserve to get called out for poor writing, obviously, but to make it sound like it's a walk in the non-junkie-riddled-park-on-the-good-side-of-the-tracks just makes you an asshat.

Posted by: RobP at December 17, 2010 4:45 PM

Er. SOUND like an asshat.

Sorry, didn't mean to call you a name directly. Just indirectly.

Posted by: RobP at December 17, 2010 4:46 PM

So basically this movie is very amazing to look at complete with CGI-effects that have not been seen before. But it lacks any real substance for a story. The result being a movie with a lot of flavoring and condiments, but absent of real meat on the bone. And as we all know, one cannot be fulfilled on a meal of salt, pepper, ketchup and mustard.

Y'know "Avatar" had the same substance quality and yet that turned into a cash geyser. I think many movie goers have proven pretty lights in the right combination are an acceptable substitute for an actual story. Let's see if this movie can mesmerize enough people to part with some of their cash too.

Posted by: bleujayone at December 17, 2010 5:44 PM

story... there was a story?
sorry, but it was seriously one of the most visually beautiful things I have seen for a while (yes, prettier then Avatar). I imagine that every sci fi/fantasy artist will add some sort reference for this movie, for at least a few weeks now.
the soundtrack is excellent as well.

the story was sort of rewritten Matrix (aka Matrix with Neon's), serviceable, decent nothing exiting, but certainly better then a hell of a lot of movies I've seen lately.

Posted by: yifatshaik at December 17, 2010 5:52 PM

So what your saying is that Tron II is a sequel to Tron. Like Whoooooaaaaa dude.

Posted by: clancys_daddy at December 17, 2010 6:24 PM

All you haters saying the first Tron was terrible and didn't have a story either, can eat a dumpster full of sweaty digital dicks.

Tron was awesome.

...No. I haven't actually watched it in the last ten years or so. What's your point?

Posted by: DarthBrookes at December 17, 2010 7:24 PM

Oh I enjoyed the hell out of it. Looks beautiful, music amazing and you Jeff Bridges is so watchable. Plus Olivia Wilde character was really charming.

Sure, there was not much of a story but like someone else said, serviceable and at least did not take it self too seriously. I mean the writer part of me really would like to have had more explanation on the ISOL or whatever thing but that would have made it tedious and taken away from action.Besides, the whole technology I understood as cloning/teleporting kinda thing and loved Dude/Flynn spouting lines like "biogenetical Jazz, man" immensely, as non-sensical those were.

I heard original was not that good and as far as a movie that is essentially about an old video game, it had enough philosophizing for me.

Posted by: yocean at December 17, 2010 7:41 PM

there’s plenty of things happening on the screen (one can tell because there are faux-pixellated explosions and very much serious seriousness on the part of the actors)

Wooooo! I'm there. I don't need a bunch of amateur philosophical shit. Sometimes you just have to get your dad out of a computer program and that's all there is to it.

Posted by: 2HB at December 17, 2010 7:47 PM

It really didn't move too badly aside from forced Disney moments. It kept moving until people seemed to require a heartfelt family moment between characters every thirty pages, and so they through in a heart-to-hert moment. Aside from a few scenes, it didn't feel like a long, drawn out movie.

Posted by: Nicolae at December 17, 2010 8:07 PM

I'm actually old enough to have seen the first "Tron" in the theaters. I was 12, and based on the commercials leading up to the release, just knew it would be the COOLEST THING IN THE WORLD. But even at 12 years old, I realized that it pretty much just sucked. I'm going to let this be one of the rare times I learn from my younger self and pass on the sequel.

Posted by: Big Dave at December 17, 2010 8:25 PM

Anyone that says there is no story, can just not even post a review. Obviously they either were too dumb to understand or uninterested from the start.

Posted by: eat a at December 17, 2010 8:33 PM

So, if I read this right, 18 years after the original, plus a TV it-girl in skintight whatever and Son of Tron ain't half as good as Reboot?

Posted by: BierceAmbrose at December 17, 2010 8:55 PM

I loved it and the soundtrack was AMAZING. The music fit this movie so perfectly. It was exactly what I went in to the theater for. It fulfilled every expectation I had. I wanted a greatly entertaining film that sugar-shocked my eyes AND ears and that's exactly what I got. I guess I can understand how some people found it boring, but I was never bored for a second. If you have any interest in this movie at all go and see it. It is absolutely worth your time. The review gets it right but treats the movie with a little too much disdain to do it justice.

Posted by: jesuschrysler at December 17, 2010 9:04 PM

someone forgot to tell the screenwriters the definition of a program: it’s computer code that does something.

I won't defend a movie I haven't seen yet, but you missed a basic point - a program is something that does something - but only ONE thing - and it does it over and over again, boringly. So giving an accounting program (original Tron) a personality was actually a mistake by those screenwriters. Only the elite programs should show signs of "life".

Posted by: someprogrammer at December 17, 2010 9:05 PM

Bierce

Are you referring to the CGI type cartoon that used to appear on saturday morning? It had a main character with like silver dreadlock things for hair and all happened inside a computer? I loved that cartoon. One of my favorites. Haven't thought about it in a long time though. Thanks for that.

Posted by: jesuschrysler at December 17, 2010 9:07 PM

Michael Sheen is only there for about 5 minutes

Well that's all I really wanted to know.

I watched Tron for the first time a couple days ago, and thought it was hilariously awful. Suffice it to say the sequel was never really intended for me.

Posted by: Uda at December 17, 2010 9:15 PM

Reboot

I'd forgotten that too - you're right jesuschrysler, I loved that at the time.

Posted by: someprogrammer at December 17, 2010 9:16 PM

@jesuschrysler, @someprogrammer

Are you referring to the CGI type cartoon ...

Yep, ReBoot. I saw somewhere that you could get it on DVD, finally. Some endless kerfuffle about ownership, rooted in a complex production history held it up. Anywho, it made me laugh out loud. Plus, "Fax Modem and Data Nully" - genius.

With Reboot and Max Headroom both available now, plus the Matrix movie, the bar is pretty damn high for any cyber-world.

This Son of Tron, sounds like I picked the wrong movie to quit self-medicating.

Posted by: BierceAmbrose at December 17, 2010 10:23 PM

How did I miss the Reboot conversation? I have fond memories from childhood of Hexadecimal. Everything else from that show is pretty vague.

Posted by: Uda at December 17, 2010 11:32 PM

I've avoided pretty much every scrap of news about Tron 2. I've seen the original, and it's not for everyone, but I enjoyed it, however nothing could've lived up to the expectations going in if you were a fan. It's the Phantom Menace rule, the more you hype yourself up, the greater the downfall you'll experience.

I've already had to deal with that emotion repeatedly after every Final Fantasy game made since the Squaresoft-Enix merger sucked ass despite each game being in development for several centuries. I don't need a reminder, yet every year millions of people hype themselves up for the next big thing, be it a new Star Wars movie, a new Indiana Jones movie, a new superhero movie, or a new movie starring a former indie darling. Each time they walk out in utter shock that something could suck that badly.

The lesson, expect nothing.

Posted by: Devil Child at December 17, 2010 11:58 PM

re:ReBoot

Oh god... I love ReBoot. There's some episodes up on youtube and it's actually hilarious, in retrospect, that their writers pulled it off. The show aged so well, considering the awkward pacing, the seemingly random plots, the blatant ripoffs of pop culture (they got sued when Bob says "d'oh!" like Homer Simpson, for one).

(Plus, Bob was my first ever cartoon crush. Hey, I was born in the mid 80s. What do you want?!)

Posted by: seeder at December 18, 2010 12:34 AM

Second on the Bob crush from Reboot....It was the only English show on tv overseas growing up and I swear it was my first real tv show I watched regularly...that and Beast Wars....

Posted by: feebthefurbieassasin at December 18, 2010 2:37 AM

Why is no one mentioning Cillian Murphy's extremely bizarre cameo? Was that NOT Cillian Murphy? I FEEL LIKE I'M TAKING CRAZY PILLS!

Speaking of. . .Michael Sheen was totes channelling Mugatu. . .and I sort of hated it.

Posted by: coveredinbees at December 18, 2010 8:44 AM

Oh but I really liked the movie. I liked it heaps.

Posted by: coveredinbees at December 18, 2010 8:45 AM

i was afraid of this. i watched tron again last year and it is a really boring film. but then i was completely swept up in the nostalgia marketing--it really got me. and now every review i read, even newspaper shills are saying it is really boring.

i just watched a trailer for the original. i kept thinking, there isnt any way to go back to that time, when in the trailer, the word "computer" is used over and over again and could really mean some other dimension, because computers were newish, whereas now, they are like the air we breathe.

Tron in the age of Twitter just doesn't feel the same, and if they couldn't craft a story to bind us, then what is left?

Posted by: idleprimate at December 18, 2010 9:52 AM

Agreed with what Zedd posted up there,, sounds exactly like the first one. I'll see it out of loyalty to The Dude.

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at December 18, 2010 11:16 AM

Just what I feared - a New Tron Bomb.

Oh well...

Posted by: Nudgie at December 18, 2010 1:11 PM

Twig, I won't call you names, but crafting a good story is complex and difficult. Fan fic writers don't have to build the world in which they write, so it's easier to move around in and play with. I have a lot of friends who do that, and even they will tell you that writing original fiction is scary and hard. When it's done, it's not even done, because you have to edit, rewrite, and polish until it's the best damned story you can tell.* At least you do if you aren't Stephenie fucking Meyer. Otherwise, you end up blowing up your own mythology and the reader can't trust you or your story anymore.

That being said, the script writers didn't have to come up with a whole new world, because this is a sequel - albeit one a hell of a long time in the making. If the story is boring, it really is because they didn't take the time to craft it well.

*Some fan fic writers do this, but they are rare.

Posted by: Reba at December 18, 2010 2:30 PM

It's not like the original Tron was some paragon of excellence. The other movie has a crappy story and great visuals, I expected as much with the new one.

Also Don't Ask, Don't Tell has been repealed! Yay America!

Posted by: Mebe at December 18, 2010 4:10 PM

So okay, I went to see this and I must strongly disagree with our dear reviewer, it was neither boring nor was it lacking in story, seemed pretty clear cut to me, in fact The Matrix wishes it had such a clear vision and motivation. At least that's what I got out of it. The visuals were nothing short of spectacular. And yes, Bridges was channeling The Dude all through the film which is a good thing as far as I'm concerned.

I suggest folks go see for themselves.


/fuck this review

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at December 18, 2010 5:01 PM

@BarbadoSlim: I agree wholeheartedly.

This review sucks balls. The movie was so much fun. I enjoyed myself. And the story was fine. It was as simple as it needed to be. Matrix liked to think it had so many rules but it wound up contradicting itself by expounding on the world. It wound up making no sense in terms of motive.

Motives were clear in this movie. Motives steered the plot.

Posted by: Jared Smith at December 18, 2010 5:50 PM

And the fact that no one mentioned the music?? FUCK YOU. It made the movie. It was amazing.

Posted by: Jared Smith at December 18, 2010 5:51 PM

Is it so bad to channel Lebowski? Fuck, just because pajiba prides itself on "scathing reviews" it doesn't mean it has to give bad ones. Stop being a bunch of dumb fucking morons and learn to enjoy a good movie, reconnect with that inner-child. Or were you skull-fucked too hard by your daddy to wanna travel that far back in your life? Quit being such whiny cunts.

Posted by: Jared Smith at December 18, 2010 5:53 PM

Why is no one mentioning Cillian Murphy's extremely bizarre cameo? Was that NOT Cillian Murphy? I FEEL LIKE I'M TAKING CRAZY PILLS!

Posted by: coveredinbees at December 18, 2010 8:44 AM

I can neither confirm nor deny that you're taking crazy pills, but you are absolutely right: creepy Cillian has an uncredited cameo in the movie as the son of the original villain (Dillinger). Apparently the producers were setting him up as the villain for (another) sequel. Maybe that'll still happen in another 28 years.

Posted by: Uriah Creep at December 18, 2010 9:28 PM

Loved it. Wish I had waited for IMAX though, because if 3D was any indication, I bet IMAX was the shit. Prolly the most beautiful film I've seen in years.

Posted by: EJ at December 19, 2010 3:03 AM

Saw it. Liked it. Really striking visuals. Wonderful score (did Disney not give us every bit of Daft Punk goodness in their soundtrack? BASTARDOS!) Olivia Wilde is beautiful. Jeff Bridges abides. THE CGI Bridges was the only weird flaw. The guy playing Sam was OK.

OK, that out of the way, let me postulate something and see whether the Pajibans 1s & 0s think I'm off my rocker or onto something:

There's a reason everyone's comparing this to The Matrix and it's more than just computers and a digital landscape. It's because both are drawing from a similar source: Christian mythology.

You got Kevin Flynn playing the role of God in the Grid. He can make anything happen. The programs see him and kneel at his presence. He even tries to embody a philosophy of peace. However, he's so removed, far and away from the Grid, that programs have stopped believing in him. His only ally is the last of the beings that were born out of the Grid (the "isos"): Quorra. She becomes his messenger and his assistant -- never questioning, always loyal. Like an angel.

Meanwhile, Flynn's creation, Clu, is out there, fulfilling his role as he thinks he is supposed to do. But he can't create. He can only repurpose or destroy. He even takes Flynn's ally, Tron and reprograms him into his own warrior/hunter. And as he is making the world his creator told him to make ("perfect"), he's in constant conflict with Flynn. Even though he commands the Grid, he can't make a move on Flynn's location -- so he comes up with a plan that ends up drawing Sam, the son of the digital deity, into their struggle.

Maybe I'm reaching. It's 3 AM.

Posted by: Fredo at December 19, 2010 4:07 AM

I don't think you are reaching Fredo, you pretty much nailed it. I'm left wondering what comes next though, what happened to Tron? (You know what I'm talking about, don't wanna spoil) and, did Flynn remake the whole grid, what was up with that at the end there?

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at December 19, 2010 7:24 AM

Saw Tron at iMax tonight and it was beautiful. The music, the CGI, the glass world... the motorcycles.

Agree completely with Fredo, re: Christian mythology. It was pretty bloody obvious I thought.

Want Cillian to be the baddie next time. He looked lovely with his iPad/desk gadget.

Posted by: Gilligiggle at December 19, 2010 8:35 AM

Saw it last night and was SORELY disappointed to say the least. This could have been SUCH an awesome movie! It should have been action and fun and 3D-amazingisms all through the flick. I must agree with our esteemed reviewer.

@Sam: The music WAS amazing...

@BigDave: I saw the original in theatre as well (and liked it well enough) so I had HIGH hopes for this one -- especially when Bridges signed on... Think, how far have we come cinematically! Didn't you expect more?

@Fredo: I would have seen Narnia if I wanted Christian pedagogery (is that the right word?) thrown at me...

Posted by: GoGo LaTata at December 19, 2010 3:15 PM

"Tron: The Laggery..."

Posted by: mary jane at December 19, 2010 3:18 PM

OK, glad to know I wasn't that lost. Sometimes when movies are this apparently simple, it can be easy to misconstrue something and to start seeing what isn't there.

BSlim, at first I thought Tron would find a way to step in between Clu and Sam & Quorra. The obvious implication is that he is still "alive" and has been able to free himself from Clu's programming. If so, I'd expect that he will rise out of his watery grave and, as the last of the 3 creators, become the new leader of the Grid and teaching the Gospel of the Users -- a digital Moses.

Posted by: Fredo at December 19, 2010 3:30 PM

GoGo, I understand. But I rather how they do it in Tron Legacy than in Narnia because Tron at least follows a video game plan and can hide all of these ideas. Without the Christian imagery, Narnia falls apart.

It is amusing that this is a Disney movie though.

Posted by: Fredo at December 19, 2010 4:09 PM

@Fredo: They BOTH were... hmmmm?

Posted by: mary jane at December 19, 2010 4:50 PM

@Fredo

Actually it's more gnostic christian than (modern, orthodox) Christian. Isolated creator god with intervening evil overlord run amok? Check. Humans contain a divine spark, isolated and corrupted by the intervening bad-seed? Check. Redemption through reunion with the creator god through "gnosis" - knowledge? Check. Hottie female principle ("Sophia" - wisdom) active in the world, providing a "gateway" to gnosis? Check.

The "gnostic christian" folks accounted for the ill-tempered old testament god and the redeemer of the new by claiming that the old one was an intervening baddie. "Gnostics" in general shared only two things, really. First, they shared a doctrine of salvation (after a fashion) through direct, personal knowing and the spark of the divine within each person. Second, the more established religions & some governments didn't like them much.

Now that I think about it, a great deal of hero / redeemer sci-fi and fantasy is more gnostic than anything else.

I may have to see this movie. Maybe there's a glyph somewhere, or a map to decode, so you can find their meetings. (If there was a mystery religion out there that didn't want to be found, how would you know?)

Posted by: BierceAmbrose at December 19, 2010 5:51 PM

It was the longest prettiest music video I've ever seen.

Posted by: Mick J at December 19, 2010 6:13 PM

BierceAmbrose, I think that's the term I was looking for -- Gnostic. I remembered that the Wachowskis used a lot of it for The Matrix movies but couldn't remember the term.

And GoGo, you're right! They both were. If I didn't know better....

Posted by: Fredo at December 19, 2010 8:48 PM

Dunno what all the fuss is about the music, most of it was derivative of the Bourne soundtrack cues.

Posted by: Justin Halliday at December 19, 2010 9:33 PM

I saw it and liked it more than I thought I would. My mom was the one who suggested it (my mom!! You don't know my mom, but if you did, you'd think it bizarre too. She watched the first one when it came out and liked it) and I thought, why not?

I really dug the group chase scene with the motorbikes. That was really awesome.

But mostly, I think it was the whole... concept? - of it that bothered me. I couldn't stop thinking about how Quorra could be flesh when transmitted out of the Grid. And if so, why can't they remake Jeff Bridges using his disc? Also, why does Clu think he can get out of the Grid and take over Earth? He's a program... I can destroy him by unplugging everything.

I know that the technical stuff is boring and whatever and we're supposed to give a movie like this some suspension of belief, but I was really distracted by it...

Also, 13 was hot in this, but I prefer her as 13. One last thing: The Aliens and Cowboys preview was SO FUCKING COOL!

Posted by: denesteak at December 31, 2010 1:40 PM

Superukash Türkiye %100 Yasal hem ucuz hem guvenli Ukash Kart satışı yapmaktadır. Ucuz ukash, ukash, ukash al, ukash destek.

Posted by: Ukash at January 22, 2011 7:31 PM

Hi! Aw, this was a really nice post. In idea I would like to put in writing like this additionally – taking time and actual effort to make a very good article… but what can I say… I procrastinate alot and by no means seem to get something done.

Posted by: download hellcats season 1 episode 4 at February 19, 2011 2:40 AM