halle_berry5.jpg

They Also Mourn Who Do Not Wear Black

Things We Lost in the Fire / Phillip Stephens

Film Reviews | October 19, 2007 | Comments (18)


The machinations of grief and its inescapable processes are powerful things to behold, usually. Loss is a permanent shadow on the human condition, a reminder of the darker and older forces our lives are privy to regardless of our own ideas of fairness and justice. Dramatic films can often replicate the more expressive properties of mourning - the crippling bouts of sorrow, the rage and frustration, all conveniently digestible emotions for which the Academy is happy to laud. But there are other sides of grief - quieter, almost indiscernible sadnesses that dog the bereaved, too. These accidental moments of grace or bitter idiosyncrasies are much harder for the camera to capture, or any but the most adept writers to pen, but they’re essential for an honest, compelling vision. And it’s the softer side of sadness that Things We Lost in the Fire can only approximate: it’s thick with “easy” grief of the simple variety, and it’s armed with actors well-equipped to dole it out, but ultimately it rings too hollow to really be a profound portrait of loss.

This portrait is of Audrey Burke (Halle Berry), whose husband Steven (David Duchovny) is killed when he tries to prevent an unhinged man from beating his wife. In addition to this heroic death, flashbacks of Steven’s character show him as an impeccable father, a loving husband, and a loyal and supportive companion to an out-of-luck old friend, Jerry (Benicio Del Toro), a recovering drug-addict whom Audrey believes to be a lost cause. Duchovny is so damned beneficent it’s almost surprising that a halo doesn’t come sprouting out of his head; this characterization gives the loss a sense of poignancy, but is also symptomatic of the vastly simplified emotional logic we’ll see throughout Fire. Audrey ends up taking Jerry in, needing another presence in the house to help fill the void; the pair both end up playing out roles as Steven’s facsimile - Audrey resumes her husband’s “project” in helping Jerry piece his life back together, while Jerry provides his presence as a good-natured aid and surrogate father-figure.

Things We Lost in the Fire doesn’t quite approach questions of class directly, but they figure into the film heavily, perhaps in unintended ways. Steven’s career as a proficient landscape developer gives the family fiscal stability, abundance even, in their upper-middle-class house and neighborhood. It’s never really clear whether Audrey has a job or not; in any case, it’s obvious she doesn’t have to work if she doesn’t want to as she’ll never want for money again. This turns out to be a double-edged sword: financial security is certainly a blessing — after all, how much worse would it be if Audrey had to get up in the midst of her sorrow and go to work? — but the wealth also gives her nothing to do, instead allowing her the cruel luxury of wallowing in her grief. Restiveness becomes as much of a problem as her loss, and yet it’s never certain whether director Susanne Bier or writer Allan Loeb meant to make this an issue at all. It could be another byproduct of Steven’s uber-benevolence, but the film’s picture of a woman with nothing to do but mourn also smacks of emotional dishonesty.

Halle Berry, whose Oscar-winning turn as another fevered widow rife with sadness, anger and sexual frustration is impossibly similar, if less complicated, than this one, is adequate in her role of condensed sorrow. Del Toro is, of course, exceptional; oddly, he’s probably too good for his character, also drawing from an acclaimed earlier performance (21 Grams) of good-intentions and barely reigned self-loathing, but we never really know much about Jerry or his past to truly understand him. He’s a generous, kind guy who easily takes up the role of caregiver, never really betraying what flaw caused him to lapse so thoroughly into drug-addiction, despite Del Toro’s performance being so nuanced as to suggest as much. Much of the movie is admirably performed, but still somehow inert due to the rote depiction of bereavement; it’s almost as if the makers of Fire read or studied the textbook properties of grief and loss, having never actually experiencing either themselves.

Phillip Stephens is the lead critic for Pajiba. He lives in Fayetteville, AR.









Lust, Caution | Rendition













Comments

First: this plot sounds very familiar to me, I can't place the exact film but I will, eventually.
Second: Halle Berry?

No thank you.

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at October 19, 2007 9:31 PM

The problem I have with movies like these is that they are such an obvious pitch for Oscars. I don't know - it's not that I think actors should avoid these types of roles altogether, maybe just be subtle about it? There is a scene in the trailer of this movie that was eerily reminiscent of a scene in Monster's Ball where she talks about needing to be taken care of. It annoyed me greatly.

Posted by: Daphne at October 19, 2007 9:35 PM

Damn it, BSlim, you keep beating me to the punch.

Posted by: Daphne at October 19, 2007 9:36 PM

BAM!

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at October 19, 2007 9:57 PM

My husband and I just got back from seeing this movie. We both enjoyed it immensely. There was only one scene that seemed a bit false to me...the rest was well-acted.

Posted by: DivaMommy at October 19, 2007 11:35 PM

God damn I love Benicio and Duchovny, but I can't bring myself to see this film. I couldn't handle the 800 swells of strings that are no doubt in this movie.

Posted by: Kevin Longrie at October 19, 2007 11:36 PM

Not a Halle fan. At. All. Take the freakin' Oscar back. Now.

I'm with you Daphne, there seemed something a bit too contrived about this. Good review though -- at least I have a clear sense of what I will be avoiding.

Posted by: Finn at October 20, 2007 12:29 AM

Woot, Sufjan!

Posted by: Geetch at October 20, 2007 3:51 PM

Why is Berry married to Duchovny in the first place? Why cast two mediocre actors as a trendy interracial couple and then kill off the sexier one in the first reel? Why aren't Duchovny and Del Toro the couple and Berry the homeless lawyer?

Posted by: matt at October 20, 2007 5:09 PM

Hey Amigos,

I'm always so late to Pajiba postings (I only catch up on the weekends) that I miss the chance to jump in and mingle with the incredible, consistently thoughtful and entertaining commentators who frequent this site, since I like to start reading from the beginning of the week; however, after just finishing off the review and all commentary on Tyler Perry's latest film from way back on 10/15, I've been so inspired by the most excellent writing and POV comments on this review alone, from the regular Pajiba crowd (the always-reliably satisfying Vermillion, wonderful Alex the Odd, the caustic B-Slim, Daphne, even the Pookster, too many to list), and even the ones I wasn't sure I'd heard from before or not (thinking about Tiki and Jen--0139 is it?? Not going back to check, great posts nonetheless), I just had to click on the latest review and join in with the gang again, which has resulted in this ridiculously-long paragraph which only serves as a useless introduction to my admiration to you all.

However, Phillip (damn you), I honestly couldn't get beyond your staggering first paragraph of this review without impulsively giving you my own shout-out, much like a little school boy who just can't hold his excitement in any longer, and usually resulting in moments like this that are, or may be, embarrassing for years to come- but damn if you couldn't help expressing them to someone else at the moment. This is mine, I guess.

Who among anyone of us having lost someone they truly love cannot just want to curl up and weep silently to themselves (even though they don't actually do it), after reading an introduction like that? Sorry, but I'm kinda lost in the moment right now. Dammit, this review better live up to that promising 1st paragraph..

Phillip, I'm going to calm down now and finish your review & the following comments.. but you really nailed me right at the beginning with that brilliant writing, which is why I probably post more on your reviews than most others (Dustin being close second), and just wanted to check in & let everyone know that, even though mental illness can sometimes get in the way when trying to express yourself, I still find the very best reading online right here at the GOP ('Good Ol' Pajiba', don't freak). And since I don't have to pay to get on this site, and am actually allowed to contribute to the discussion if I choose, my compulsiveness has now been satisfied. Please forgive my interruption.

...Oh yeah, I got another review to finish (not to mention the rest of this 12-pack)

So okay bye

Posted by: TMax at October 20, 2007 5:45 PM

Yes! For the Sufjan reference. Great review!

Posted by: susan at October 20, 2007 9:43 PM

Hey TMax, you got me smiling after a hard day's slog! I, too, consider myself a big Pajiba joiner (and I like that whether they'd want to invite me into the club or not doesn't seem to matter). It's a lovely place, hey? The writers and readers both have provided much thinkie goodness to chew on since I found the site and damned if I'm not grateful. Also, laughs aplenty.

I only have one beer here (in case anyone started wondering) so, cheers!
:)

Posted by: rebeccah at October 21, 2007 2:07 AM

Hey, thanks, Rebeccah. Every time I post I'm afraid I'm gonna get slammed by someone, but I guess that's the chance you take. It can be an intimidating place, but I couldn't stop reading (or injecting my own opinions) if I tried.

By the way, I loved the rest of the review and was a bit relieved that Phillip didn't think the film delivered as sincere a message as it might have- bad news for viewers, I'm sure, but it at least helped me to avoid crying in my beer with mushiness the rest of the evening, I've been doing too much of that lately.

And, my goodness, almost 7:00am? It's about an hour past my bedtime. I'll be looking for more of your comments in the future, Rebeccah, there are so many great ones to catch up on. Have a great Sunday!

Posted by: TMax at October 21, 2007 6:52 AM

Sometimes I wonder why certain movies are made. I saw the trailer for this one and my first thought was, "So?" Watching grief play out onscreen was probably great first time around, so why does it need to be made again? To be desirable, one would think that a movie needs more than a what some might consider great cast - it also needs a plot hook. I could go live with my widowed grandmother and experience everything this movie has to offer.

Posted by: Carling at October 21, 2007 9:18 AM

Good, concise, well-written review, Phillip.

Posted by: Lilly at October 21, 2007 2:43 PM

I don't know what it is about Berry but she seems to only have two possible directions when choosing movie roles (I of course say "Berry" when I probably mean "Berry's agent or manager or whatever"): Either "wide eyed and fragile, regularly quaking with grief/terror" or "wooden and camptastic possibly with a bizarre accent for no apparent reason".

Really, to me, she's always going to be the secretary from the Flinstones movie. No two ways about it.

And TMax: I'm totally eBlushing right now, verbose and rambling love is always appreciated.

Posted by: Alex the Odd at October 22, 2007 7:36 AM

Loss is a permanent shadow on the human condition

Now that is a nice turn of phrase.

TMax (and rebeccah): Don't let a few hyenas run (or ruin) the savannah. Get in there and mix it up -- the folks worth talking to will engage, not name-call. The hell with those other people. To borrow and tweak a phrase: Come for the articles, stay for the comments.

And lastly: Phillip Stephens is the lead critic for Pajiba. Phillip, I hope DR didn't trick you into accepting that in lieu of more cabbage.

Posted by: socalledonlycousins at October 22, 2007 10:52 AM

Oh Tmax. There was an episode of the Twilight Zone where Art Carney plays an alcoholic "store" Santa. At one point a bartender asks, "Why do you drink so much?" and Santa replies, "it's drink or weep, and I find drinking to be the less obvious." Something like that at least. So, the point of this is, don't drink and cry...

Posted by: soso23 at October 22, 2007 1:04 PM


















Viral Hits

>> Pajiba Movie Posters

>> Pop Culture's 20 Greatest Dancing GIFs

>> Mindhole Blowers

>> The 100 Greatest Insults of All Time

>> The "Other" 100 Greatest Movie Quotes

>> The 100 Greatest Movie Threats of All Time

>> The Sean Bean Death Reel

>> Chicks Dig Beards: It's Science

>> The Coolest TV Show Title Sequences

>> The Most Rewatchable Movies

>> The Most Expensive Movies of All Time