free counter with statistics The Unborn Review | Scathing Reviews for Bitchy People

unborn-movie-poster.jpg
Dybbukake!

The Unborn / Dustin Rowles

Film Reviews | January 10, 2009 | Comments (82)


Of the many, many things that annoy me about teen-focused horror movies centered on the young, hot heroine (One Missed Call, Prom Night, The Haunting of Molly Hartley, The Eye, House of Wax), the one thing I may loathe the most is that fact that the young, hot heroine is almost always a whiny, insufferable bitch who is the last person you want to save. She whines and moans and why me’s her way through the movie, while her friends and family play hero, sacrificing themselves to protect her from evil spirits and boogeyman. And who dies? The friends and family. And who lives? The whiny, insufferable bitch, of course. What the hell happened to survival of the fittest? If the real world were a horror movie, it would be 75 percent Jessica Alba, while the other 25 percent would be comprised of guys with bad facial hair and near-fatal shoulder wounds.

The Unborn is the latest and one of the more egregious examples of this trend, and this one comes from the enigmatic David S. Goyer. I say enigmatic because I can’t figure the level of this man’s talent. He’s a terrible screenwriter (Blade II, Blade Trinity, Demonic Toys), except when he works with a more talented writer, like Christopher Nolan (Batman Begins, The Dark Knight) or Alex Proyas (Dark City). My guess is that Goyer is an ideas man, and he’s fairly awful with the details. The Unborn further demonstrates that: It’s the first mainstream film that I know of that mines the dybbuk myth, which might make for a fairly good plot device if a better writer/director/cast had been involved. Unfortunately, beyond the dybubuk idea, The Unborn (to get the lame, horribly unclever pregnancy puns out of the way upfront) is a first-rate miscarriage, a cinematic abortion that should’ve never been conceived in the first place (did I leave out stillborn? Damnit).

Odette Yustman (Cloverfield, “October Road”) stars as Woman in Panties, a college student who lives at home and spends a lot of time in front of the mirror and/or jogging. Her mother (Carla Gugino) mysteriously committed suicide while institutionalized when Woman in Panties was just a Little Girl in Panties. One night while Woman in Panties is babysitting a creepy neighbor kid, the kid whacks her with a mirror, which does something weird to her eye, which in turn leads to the discovery that Woman in Panties was a twin; her twin brother died in utero. This is important only because the dybbuks are fond of twins for no real reason other than the fact that that’s how Goyer would like it. So, anyway, this dybbuk — an evil spirit that refuses to leave the human world and inhabits the body of a person because it can’t get into the gates of hell/heaven — starts tormenting her by appearing in Woman in Panties’ dreams, in her mirror, and — naturally — in dance club bathrooms (dybbuks love house music!)

Apparently, this dybbuk — who last inhabited the body of Woman in Panties’ Great Uncle, who was killed by her grandmother in Auschwitz — would really fucking like to inhabit Woman in Panties’ body, probably because he’s a Hanes Her Way kind of spirit. And instead of just jumping on in there, the dybbuk inhabits people around her, and then uses their bodies to scare the bejesus out of her. It doesn’t make a whole helluva lot of sense. Goyer is just kind of hoping that, if you stare at Woman in Panties ass long enough, you won’t sweat the details. It’s a fairly convincing ass; unfortunately, it’s terribly miscast. It should probably stick to Victoria’s Secret commercials, and leave the real asswork to Jessica Alba.

*Spoilers*

Anyway, Woman in Panties’ father is away on a business trip and apparently too busy to come home and help her daughter deal with the evil spirit trying to inhabit her body, so eventually Woman in Panties tracks down a Rabbi (Gary Oldman), and convinces him to drive away the dybbuk by reading some Hebrew passages and blowing a shofar, which is pretty goddamn entertaining if you can find joy in the indignifying acts of great actors (seriously: What the fuck, Oldman? Was it white boy day?) and then the dybbuk inhabits the body of Stringer Bell (Idris Elba), and everyone yells a lot of Hebrew from printed off copies of the exorcism manual at whatever body the dybbuk is inhabiting until it’s eventually driven back to hell in a very PG-13-like manner. Yay!

*End Spoilers*

The Unborn is about on par with every other teenage horror flick to come out over the last few years, which is to say it’s dull, dumb, and plodding. In other words, it’s a great make-out movie. But, I’ll give Goyer this: He has a flair for visual effects; early on in The Unborn, there are some fairly creepy sequences involving the Auschwitz kid, who likes to curl himself up inside of medicine cabinets (those dybbuks! No accounting for comfort). Unfortunately, as the movie progresses, Goyer throws so many of these creepy effects at you that they lose their oomph, and after awhile, they’re fairly laughable (in fact, at the sold-out screening I attended, the audience — or at least those who remained past the half hour mark — alternated flinching and guffawing at the imagery, though by the end, half were shaking their head in exasperation). But, when Goyer wasn’t throwing dogs with upside down heads at you, he did have the good sense to point that camera at Woman in Panties’ ass, which doesn’t make for a very good horror film, but underwear aficionados may get a kick out of it.

Dustin Rowles is the publisher of Pajiba. He lives withi his wife and son in Portland, Maine You can reach him via email, or leave a comment below.









Bride Wars Review | Golden Globes 2009 Open Thread


Comments

You are a bitter little man Rowles.

Buuut I can't disagree with you on this.

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at January 10, 2009 1:06 PM

yesssssssss i've been waiting for this!
everytime i see the poster for this movie i vom a little in my mouth. the virginal white undies thing only works when it's ripley, k? otherwise it's just exploitive.

Posted by: Eleanor at January 10, 2009 1:15 PM

I have to admit: I was actually a bit intrigued by the creepy trailers for this movie. But after reading this, I think I'll put the six bucks in the old savings account for new carpet in the Beaverhausen casa.

Posted by: Anastasia Beaverhausen at January 10, 2009 1:19 PM

Rowles you act like a woman standing in her panties with a pronounced camel toe is a bad thing, what gives?

Posted by: Pookie at January 10, 2009 1:29 PM

dybbuks love house music!

Ha! I have to find a way to incorporate that into EVERY conversation I have this weekend.

This is somewhat expected, but still a bit disappointing. I was hoping for a decent horror movie.

Posted by: Lainey at January 10, 2009 1:34 PM

I was hoping, hoping, hoping. Maybe Uninvited, idk. How can I keep trusting when they always let me down?

Jessica Alba, gross.

Posted by: Wenders at January 10, 2009 1:57 PM

I'm liking the poster. Nice panties. Mmmmmm. Panties. My probation officer tells me I'm not allowed in the womens room at Old Navy anymore, so screw him! I have internet!

And one SERIOUS hangover. Fuck around does my head hurt. And now it hurts a little more. Fuck.

Posted by: Xtreme at January 10, 2009 2:10 PM

Anytime I see trailers for movies like these, I think that the kernel of their story would make great Hellblazer story. The difference is that instead of reading a bunch of old Hebrew or whatever, Constantine would roll his eyes at the hapless ignorant victims, trick the dybbuk into doing itself in without breaking a sweat, shag the girl in white panties, get decked by the girl in white panties' father, have a heart to heart with the devil, and then finish off the movie getting shitfaced on stout in a pub with a fallen angel.

Here's an idea: if your horror movie is going to suck, just steal a script from an old Ennis Hellblazer. Everyone will be happier.

Posted by: stipe42 at January 10, 2009 2:14 PM

I couldn't get past 'Gary Oldman'.

That's the point when I broke down and sobbed.

Posted by: figgy at January 10, 2009 2:24 PM

inhabits the body of Stringer Bell (Idris Elba)
Got a little laugh out of me. Just for the fact that we all know the character's name doesn't matter. I've never seen the Wire but I've heard so many rave reviews for it that I feel like I know everyone.

Posted by: Optimus Rhyme at January 10, 2009 2:29 PM

Hey, maybe Oldman likes to go slumming for some Woman in Panties action too. It is probably a fun shoot for the old guy.

Posted by: Lindsey at January 10, 2009 2:30 PM

The dybbuk and the golem are two of the best parts of Jewish folklore that somehow only rarely make it into the mainstream as such. The best (and, okay, only) dybbuk movie i've seen is Der Dybbuk . It's Yiddish, Expresionist, and startlingly freaky. You get lulled into complacency with the old-timey special effects and the funny-sounding language (I study it; therefore I can mock it), then you realize that HOLY SHIT CRAZY DANSE MACABRE WON'T GET OUT OF MY HEAD!

Thinking on it a bit, that may explain why, as Dustin points out, dybbuks love house music. Where else can you dance like your having a seizure and go unnoticed?

Posted by: foursweatervests at January 10, 2009 2:34 PM

I think I'll put the six bucks in the old savings account for new carpet in the Beaverhausen casa.

The hell with new carpet, just wax the old one.

Can't say I'm surprised by the review. But on the other hand, nice panties.

Posted by: admin at January 10, 2009 3:14 PM

That is quite an ass. :)

Posted by: adam at January 10, 2009 3:21 PM

As I found out in another review, the highlight of this movie is the work done by Odette Yustman's glorious ass. It really should be nominated for "Best Actress". Nothing Merryl Streep or Anne Hathaway does will compare to that ass.

Oh...and we get camel toe shots. Big screen camel toe.

Tell me you don't want to catch this movie now.

Posted by: Fredo at January 10, 2009 3:23 PM

I'm seriously thinking about changing my entire approach to commenting on the various topics that the reviewers post. I truly believe I can get my point across without the vulgarity that usually accompany my post. From this moment going forward I will refrain from using the vernacular of the uncouth.

Posted by: Pookie at January 10, 2009 3:24 PM

PANTY PAAAAAAARTYY!

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at January 10, 2009 3:30 PM

Well said, Mr. stipe. I don't hate the "Constantine" movie but.....what a great movie someone could make of it.

Bollocks!

Posted by: Jay at January 10, 2009 3:31 PM

What does it say about your film when Jessica Alba would have improved it?

On another note, avoid PG-13 horror flicks. Sure, one or two have been good. But without the gratuitous violence, it's just not the same. It's like a porno film on Showtime, so much is missing.

Other genres to avoid at all cost:

Talking Animal Films
Video Game Films
Films based of ads
Dreamwork's Films
Spoof Films

Posted by: George at January 10, 2009 3:37 PM

Recently picked up Constantine on Blu-ray after having not watched it for about a year. Can't say why more people didn't like that flick, i though it was pretty damn good. I mean, they fucking kill Shea for Christ's sakes, that's gotta be worth something! That said, i do wish they make a sequel and introduce an bit more of the comic storylines into the mix, i hate it when they miss the mark on an intellectual property, even if they do it in a great way.

Posted by: smatt584 at January 10, 2009 3:42 PM

Recently picked up Constantine on Blu-ray after having not watched it for about a year. Can't say why so many people didn't like that flick, i though it was pretty damn good. I mean, they fucking kill Shea for Christ's sakes! And right in the middle of his little "hero moment", that's gotta be worth something! That said, i do wish they make a sequel and introduce an bit more of the comic storylines into the mix, i hate it when they miss the mark on an intellectual property, even if they do it in a great way.

Posted by: smatt584 at January 10, 2009 3:44 PM

God-Damnit!, EDIT!!!

Posted by: smatt584 at January 10, 2009 3:45 PM

Jay, also avoid at all costs American remakes of horror films from other countries. (see also: The Ring/2, The Eye, One missed call, The grudge-all of them, ad, rinse, repeat)

Posted by: smatt584 at January 10, 2009 3:47 PM

Dybbuk, shmybbuk, I said more ham!

Posted by: Geetch at January 10, 2009 3:52 PM

The existence of this movie is awesome for one reason, and one reason only: the title of this Pajiba review. Kudos!

Posted by: Jerce at January 10, 2009 3:53 PM

Oh, you meant Shia! I was confused for a few minutes there. Well, yeah, I suppose that serves him right for not being the real Chas.

Posted by: Jay at January 10, 2009 3:58 PM

Okay, back before I read this review and happily knew nothing about the movie I imagined it might be a very imaginative Catholic Church produced treatise against abortion. I mean, just think about it:

"When she was 17, little Suzy was a skank and let her boyfriend do her on the living room couch. Two months later, as she once again ran to the bathroom to vomit, she was horrified to realize that his evil Protestant seed had taken root. *Eerie music begins softly* At a complete loss and without a strong religious education, Suzy made a drastic decision. *Eerie music reaches its crescendo and cuts off to an equally eerie silence* She got.. an abortion. *Even creepier music picks up* Now, 5 years later, as Suzy gets ready to finish her Communications BA, her unborn child... comes back."

Yeah. I could see that happening.

Posted by: Fi at January 10, 2009 4:06 PM

Your mistake was reviewing this movie, Dustin, when you should have been reviewing DAT ASS!

Posted by: Withnail at January 10, 2009 4:26 PM

Why, Gary, why?! You're breaking my heart here!

I'm not saying my cinematic love affair with you is over, Mr. Oldman. But I am telling you to take your toothbrush home, for you are no longer allowed to spend the night making sweet love to me in my dreams!

Should there be another gem left in the Batman franchise, I'll consider the occasional booty call.

Until then, in the immortal words of Mahatma Gandhi: "Don't let the door hit ya where the good lord split ya!" (That was Ghandi right?)

Posted by: Sarah at January 10, 2009 4:32 PM

PG-13 horror isn't the problem. Studios that want PG-13 horror after letting a director shoot an R film are the problem. Not that anything could have saved this garbage. Hackneyed forced studio editing to open up to a broader market has destroyed potentially greater films than The Unborn.

Posted by: Robert at January 10, 2009 4:33 PM

Yeah, like the punisher and daredevil...


Oh shit, man I can't keep a straight face when I type this crap

Posted by: Smatt584 at January 10, 2009 4:41 PM

I can't watch the trailer for this, the creepy, jerky upside-down people scare the crap out of me. Mr. Kolby has to warn me to close my eyes whenever it comes on. Of course, FOX showed the trailer no less than 38 times during the BCS Championship Game.

Posted by: Kolby at January 10, 2009 5:01 PM

Where can I buy those spray-on panties for my wife?

Posted by: L.O.V.E. at January 10, 2009 5:20 PM

I wonder how long Pookie's resolution will last...

POOKIEWATCH '09!

Posted by: figgy at January 10, 2009 6:41 PM

What the fuck, Oldman? Was it white boy day?

Well done. :- )

Posted by: DarthCorleone at January 10, 2009 7:09 PM

"In other words, it's a great make-out movie."

Hmmm ...

Anybody else here listen to Lex and Terry on the radio? The other day they were doing a bit where they had four women on the phone and one of the guys in the crew was asking them questions trying to see if he could guess from their answers which one of the four wasn't wearing panties (obviously, he couldn't just ask "Are you or are you not wearing panties?" because it wouldn't be as funny that way ...)

Anyway, one of the questions was "Have you ever had sex in a public place?"

One chick says "Yeah."

He asks, "Where was it?"

She says, "In a movie theater."

He asks, "What was the movie?"

She says, "'Independence Day.'"

I was in the car by myself and I busted out laughing ... with a cop right next to me.

Yeah ... good times.

+++

Pookie without vulgarity? Now THAT'S damn sPookie.

Posted by: bucdaddy at January 10, 2009 7:19 PM

Just got back from Googling Odette Yustman photos (seriously, is there a weird-name factory somewhere upon whose production the financial meltdown has had no impact?) and the interesting thing about that photo is, it's not her best side.

Ta-ta!

Posted by: bucdaddy at January 10, 2009 7:24 PM

I can hear the Swedish Chef saying "Odette yustman da chickee!" while wringing a chicken's neck.

Posted by: bucdaddy at January 10, 2009 7:45 PM

Well actually Robert, it is the problem. Most people can't scare you, because most people have no talent when it comes to writing. So the only thing that can save a horror movie otherwise is gratuitous boobies and laughably stupid violence. Just look at Final Destination, Evil Dead, Friday the 13 sequels, Snakes on a Plane, or Hostel (not a good movie, but people die and fuck in it, and for some sick twisted reason, I don't hate Hostel. It's probably because I'm a male age 16-24, and the film had tits and gore galore).

Without resorting to that, you're probably pandering to very young teens, who are known for drawing high box office sums to shitty movies. There's no point. The only PG-13 horror flicks worth watching are Sixth Sense, Gremlins, and Poltergeist. Other than that, you'll be walking into an empty wasteland where creativity and inspiration are nowhere to be found.

Posted by: George at January 10, 2009 8:02 PM

I think that relying solely on nudity and violence is the tell-tale sign of a lack of creativity and inspiration, so Robert's point still holds up against yours.

Posted by: Smatt584 at January 10, 2009 8:51 PM

I think that relying solely on nudity and gore is the tell-tale sign of a lack of creativity and inspiration, so Robert's point still holds up against yours.

Posted by: Smatt584 at January 10, 2009 8:52 PM

Oh, son of a bitch, EDIT!!!

Posted by: Smatt584 at January 10, 2009 8:56 PM

Hey, I grew-up on nudity and violence and I turned out just fine, thank you very much.

Posted by: L.O.V.E. at January 10, 2009 10:40 PM

Hey, look on the bright side. At least she isn't screaming into a fucking oven.

Posted by: Shay at January 10, 2009 10:55 PM

Of course, FOX showed the trailer no less than 38 times during the BCS Championship Game.

Posted by: Kolby at January 10, 2009 5:01 PM

I said jesus is this the only friggin movie coming out this weekend because dumb bride wars!

Posted by: blacksred at January 10, 2009 11:06 PM

Well of course creativity holds up more, but what you're not getting is this; most people aren't creative. So instead, just give me something I can latch onto, instead of stupidity, go for over-stupidity. Then you're film will at least have something. It's much easier to do that, but the box office draws will be less, everyone want's to be the next Shamalan in terms of money.

But odds are, they don't have creativity. So just go for the whole Toxic Avenger angle, or stuff like that.

Posted by: George at January 10, 2009 11:37 PM

gary. really. what the fuck?


okay, now i'll go back and read this thing....

Posted by: maxpurr9 at January 10, 2009 11:37 PM

Gary Oldman, someone should have told you that naw, it ain't white boy day.

Then they'd shoot you and steal your whore.

Posted by: JakesAlterEgo at January 10, 2009 11:49 PM

That ass is flat.

Posted by: jM at January 11, 2009 12:00 AM

i made a little personal commitment to myself and by extension gary oldman 5 years ago to watch every move he has ever been or will be in. it took me almost 8 months to get through them all. i had a new baby, was a stay-home-mom, and just got a brand new netflix account! i had the pleasure of being able to start at the beginning and go all the way to this very evening.
fun hobby--especially since right towards the end of the video run, i was able to go and see him at the theatre in 'Batman Begins.' ahhhh...good times....


but THIS perplexes me....? why gary?

was it a favor to a friend? do you need the money? are you bored? do you feel you have to work as much as you can now, so you can work less later? really. explain yourself.
if i hadn't laughed so hard through most of it, i would be pissed off right now and honestly a little heartbroken....

oh well. i still fucking love you and will be around for the next one---i'm curious to see how far down the 'hole' we're goin'.... it's like a bad joke....(said in an old-timey announcer voice): "what will happen to gary and is batman his only hope? stay tuned folks."

Posted by: maxpurr9 at January 11, 2009 12:15 AM

Sorry, George. I guess I just have a completely different perspective on horror than you. For example, the quickest way to make me hate a film is to toss gratuitous nudity and violence at the screen. I spend time hunting down intelligent horror films that at least attempt to have some depth beyond the gallon count of blood pumped at the screen. It's why I mainly stick to foreign horror (which can be justifiably brutal, like In My Skin or Frontiers), modern indies (like The Rise and Fall of Leslie Vernon), and older classics (like The Nanny, The Invisible Man, of The Wicker Man).

And to be perfectly honest, I think The Sixth Sense is pure shit. Easily the third worst film Shyamalan ever made (behind Lady in the Water and Signs) because it's about tricking people into being surprised. Playing "gotcha!" with the audience isn't exactly the sign of a great film. The merit comes from two stellar performances (Osment and Collette) that carry an otherwise lackluster presentation.

Good PG-13 horror is polarizing because people like you feel cheated out of gratiutous tits and blood. The Exorcism of Emily Rose is utterly disturbing, yet many can't accept a horror film that intentionally doesn't spell it out for the audience. 1408 pulled away from the cheap shocks in the source story and pissed off too many King fans for doing so. Paperhouse is pure psychological terror that goes a bit too obtuse for mainstream acceptance (or to justify a US release on DVD 20+ years later).

The ones that tend to be awful are the hackneyed, take a great concept and sanitize it to get the PG-13 rating by any means necessary for money films (like the remake of The Eye, or the remake of The Ring, or The Messengers). This seems like one of them. You may disagree. Which is strange, since both of our arguments amount to the same damn thing: studios are fucking up big time in a misguided attempt to earn big bucks.

I beat my record from last year, that's for sure. I didn't get on my horror film soapbox till well past Jan. 11 then. Though I guess it doesn't count, since George didn't review the film.

Posted by: Robert at January 11, 2009 12:22 AM

I cannot see anything having to do with this movie without thinking, "Upside-down dog! UPSIDE-DOWN DOG!!!" Gah!

Posted by: Anna von Beaverpatz at January 11, 2009 12:23 AM

I thought "1408" was all cheap shocks and "ooooh, isn't this all so very strange?" I was completely unimpressed. I don't particularly like horror movies anyway but I hoped it'd have some effect on me.

On the other hand, I do particularly like a rear end but that one up there is also unimpressive, jM. I know other men would disagree with me, but there's a difference between having shape and being thin with toned muscles. Exercise can make your ass smaller, but it won't give you one (no, I don't like looking at the volleyball Olympians either. Plus, how interesting's a bathing suit? Pffft. Gimme big-legged speedskatin' women)

Posted by: Jay at January 11, 2009 1:36 AM

Dating, the warmest and happiest season of the year, has finally arrived. A perfect summers date is when the sun is shining, the gentle wind is blowing, and you and your date frolic in the sun. But wait! Do you already have special someone? Do not worry! We are here to help you find that special someone this coming season.....M I X E D M A T E .com

Posted by: candy at January 11, 2009 1:43 AM

You take that shit outside, candy. This is my COLDEST and happiest season of the year, and I don't need you trying to steal it from me, nor causing trouble by trying to arrange "discreet" relationships for these nice people here. OUT! Hope ya dressed appropriately!

Posted by: Jay at January 11, 2009 1:53 AM

Dammit. Curse you Gary Oldman for letting me think even for a minute, yes 60 of seconds there, that "this could be actually worth seeing?"

But, well, if it's a good make-out movie with pretty underwear girl, then maybe I could find a good use...

Posted by: yocean at January 11, 2009 2:54 AM

That ass up there is...well...boring. It's so small. I have the same rule for tits and ass cheeks -- each one better be more than a handful.

Posted by: donut sugarcake at January 11, 2009 3:33 AM

I hear ya, Jay. At a quick first glance, you're, like, "Whoa!" *double-take*
But, then, upon closer inspection... not so impressive. Odette's definitely a pretty girl, she just could stand to scoff a sammich, or three.

I also agree on 1408. Thoroughly unimpressed. In fact, I was pissed that I had to pay for that rental (I seem to qualify for freebies on a regular basis at my local store, but that wasn't one of those days.)
That film, plus so many of the other PG-13 horror-fare is too lukewarm, and watered-down for my taste.
I'm not ALL about boobs and blood in my horror flick-shows; a subtle mix of atmosphere, and non-gratuitous gore (with a smidge of boob to enhance the flavor, perhaps) works well. But a PG-13 rating yanks the teeth right out of what might be a truly effective horror piece, IMO.

Posted by: Rykker at January 11, 2009 3:40 AM

Good morning everyone, last night was the first night in a long time that I didn't have to take anything to help me sleep. I feel as though I have a new lease on life, I'm juicing and doing the wheat grass thing. I'm reading the classics now, and I'm also getting into the scripture. One of my closes friends has asked me to join her bible study group, and I'm seriously considering it. I've sworn off liquor and porn because I know now that I have a very addictive personality and those vices have led me down some dark roads. I'm also keeping a journal of my experiences which has proven to be very cathartic in that I'm beginning to get an insight in my behavior. I want to apologize to the staff here at pajiba and I want to apologize to all of you for my past actions.


Yours, Sean

Posted by: Pookie at January 11, 2009 8:39 AM

*belch*

*opens beer*

Good for you, brother Pookie.

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at January 11, 2009 10:39 AM

Don't be too proud of these straw men you've constructed. Your ability to destroy whatever I find useful is insignificant next to the power of the righteous. And I find you lack of faith disturbing.

Posted by: Pookie at January 11, 2009 11:03 AM

Can't say why so many people didn't like that flick

Keanu Reeves as a blonde British man.

Posted by: twig at January 11, 2009 11:12 AM

It weirds me out that her thighs don't touch. I mean, nothing wrong with being slender, but it just makes her look strange.

I think she'd look much better if she put on about ten pounds.

But then, I prefer curvy to stick figure. Perhaps because I am curvy!

Oh, the movie. Yeah, I'm seeing it tomorrow with a friend after work. I anticipate cackling throughout the film.

Posted by: lizzie"mallory"borden at January 11, 2009 12:24 PM

I noticed that also lizzie, but it wasn't an issue for me.

Posted by: Pookie at January 11, 2009 12:44 PM

I was actually kind of looking forward to this movie, if only because I was actually a twin, and my sister was miscarried while I made it. My mom still refers to her as my evil twin. That alone gave the whole thing an extra air of creepiness that it obviously doesn't deserve. And I love a good dybbuk story.

Of course, when mentioning to friends that I wanted to see it, I did qualify the statement with, "I know it's going to suck..." I'm just kind of sorry to find out that it really did blow.

Hope springs eternal.

Posted by: Tyburn Blossom at January 11, 2009 12:50 PM

I don't care, this shit will give me a lame but workable excuse to get ALL up on the much-too-young-for-me bowl of hotness that I'm forcing to bring me to this movie. (Cliches are fun, y'all.)We will make out, and then I will drag him to my lair and do all manner of beastly things to him until HE screams like a girl. This movie RULES.

Posted by: Cletus at January 11, 2009 1:22 PM

Pookie's real name is Sean?

Hmm. Sean Pookie Combs.


Sounds about right.

Posted by: L.O.V.E. at January 11, 2009 1:42 PM

Cletus, that is the hottest thing I have read today.

Posted by: Anna von Beaverplatz at January 11, 2009 1:45 PM

Sean yes, Pookie Combs no. I had a feeling I should not have used my first name, but I'm trying to open myself up to you guys.

Posted by: Pookie at January 11, 2009 1:49 PM

I agree Anna, Cletus has a way with words. So umm, Anna, come and give Cletus a back rub.

Posted by: Pookie at January 11, 2009 1:56 PM

thats one fine-ass,when females put down the frito`s and cheeto`s and perhaps EXERCISE ,thats the result.

Posted by: pasadenamike at January 11, 2009 3:03 PM

I don't know she looks a little chunky to me.

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at January 11, 2009 3:32 PM

Pasadenamike and BSlim I'm not at all comfortable with the way you guys objectify women.

Posted by: Pookie at January 11, 2009 3:39 PM

Hang on....Cletus is also a female? I'd say that crosses a line. Now, I know it's always safe to assume that ambiguous names here are female, but now you're just causing trouble. Meanwhile I can only envision Jerry Reed.

Posted by: Jay at January 11, 2009 4:26 PM

Guy, chick, what does it matter? That was just plain hot, either way.

That girl does not exercise, she has the metabolism of a 22 year old girl with a good metabolism. There's no muscle tone there anywhere.

Thanks for sticking up for us ladies, Pookie. I'm off to make you a sandwich, mustard or mayo? Or maybe something sexier, like a nice pesto?

Posted by: Anna von Beaverplatz at January 11, 2009 6:02 PM

It doesn't matter AvB, whatever you put out I'm eatin'

Posted by: Pookie at January 11, 2009 6:32 PM

Well, if someone forces me to go to a movie I'm more prone to be irritable and sulky rather than amorous, but that's me. Just don't hurt the poor boy's feelings now!

Posted by: Jay at January 11, 2009 6:35 PM

I saw this movie with some friends. The Theatre was packed. It was the first night it was out. The first couple scenes with her jogging and the demented mask dog animal beast dream thing was like a Scary movie 3 type deal. I think the only time people screamed was the medicine cabinet scene. People laughed and left through the rest of the movie. At the end of the movie, everyone that was left stood up and Boo'd.

Posted by: Eric at January 11, 2009 10:20 PM

Looked good, disappointed to see it isn't

Posted by: RichieRich at January 11, 2009 10:41 PM

Carla Gugino is the mother. Odette Yustman is the daughter. Man, I don't care how wrong it is, I'd like to be the step-father in that family.

Posted by: Sal at January 12, 2009 12:01 AM

When I saw dybbukake, I thought of bukkake...but that's totally normal, right?

Posted by: bakers_dozen at January 12, 2009 7:48 AM

This movie was awful. Tedious and awful. 20 minutes in, and I told my friend I was going to watch the rest of the movie cross-eyed. After about a minute, I said doing that only made it worse, 'cos there was 2 of her.

Oh, and what mental hospital has statues in the hallway? Old, crumbling stone statues? Really?

Although, at the end, I told my friends not to worry, because in a couple of years someone will remake the movie, and it'll be even worse.

Posted by: Nadha at January 12, 2009 3:54 PM



searchthesite.jpg