web
counter

serial podcast / the walking dead / snl / mindhole blowers / netflix / celebrity facts / marvel


The Search for the Worst Movie Ever: 'Ragnarok'

By Cinesnark | Film Reviews | August 19, 2014 | Comments ()


ragnarok-pc3a5l-sverre.jpg

After the first installment of this series, you guys named candidates for possible worst movies ever, some of which I’ve banked for a rainy day in case there’s not a more timely release worth reviewing. I am attempting a methodology here, trying to stick to current(ish) titles, primarily available in theatrical/on demand release, with Netflix Instant as my back-up. I’m specifically looking for stuff that should be good, but isn’t working. A movie handicapped by its age (once upon a time, Tango & Cash was a good movie) or its origin (The Room never stood a chance) isn’t the same thing as a movie with every advantage that still manages to blow chunks.

This week’s offering is Ragnarok, a Norwegian import currently in limited theatrical release (please don’t pay premium prices for this twaddle) and available on demand. I had some hopes for this movie, for though it looks terrible, it comes from Magnet Releasing, a relatively reliable purveyor of horror. Don’t get me wrong, there’s some trash on their resume, but they’re also responsible for putting out Grand Piano, V/H/S, Europa Report, Hobo with a Shotgun, Tim and Eric’s Billion Dollar Movie, Big Bad Wolves, Rubber, Tucker & Dale vs. Evil (a Hall of Fame personal favorite), and Trollhunter, which is a hugely enjoyable Norwegian movie. So I had some grounds for thinking Ragnarok might turn out okay.

It did not turn out okay.

Ragnarok starts with an interesting premise—archaeologists studying a Viking funeral site make a radical discovery—but anything resembling intrigue or mystery dies under the weight of a confused tone, boring execution, and a lousy script. At first it seems like it’s going to be a horror movie with supernatural elements—perhaps the mysterious Viking runes unlock a portal or something—then it shifts to an Indiana Jones-esque action/adventure complete with grave robbing and not one but TWO double-crossing assholes, and it ends up a rote creature feature. And the whole thing is totally defanged by being family friendly.

Ragnarok violates the cardinal sin of filmmaking: It’s boring. We’re halfway through the movie before anything remotely interesting happens. The setup of “ostracized archaeologist strikes out on his own to Prove He’s Right” takes FORTY-FIVE MINUTES. There’s not even significant character development to occupy us during this time because there’s only like six people in the entire movie, and all of them fit into standard character tropes. Sigurd is the widower obsessed with Viking runes, his children are typically resentful of his divided attentions, his boss is a Standard Boss Jerk. The wilderness guide character was a straight Quint rip-off, so much so that for a moment I thought this would be “Norwegian Jaws.” Unfortunately, it has more in common with Anaconda and Lake Placid.

I won’t ever hold a movie’s budget against it, but there are plenty of cheap camera tricks to make up for a lack of monster. We barely see the beast that nominally terrorizes Sigurd and his family, but just because you can’t show us anything, doesn’t mean you can’t still do stuff to make its presence feel threatening. Twice this movie uses a wide shot of water splashing to invoke fear. The second instance of splashing actually occurs from a cutaway of an underwater shot. Instead of sticking with the monster surging and giving us some water-churning attack footage, the scene cuts to a long-distance water splash. Just terrible decision making.

That’s where the family-friendly impact can be felt. Any chance Ragnarok had at being truly scary is undermined by an unwillingness to show real violence or gore. The final confrontation between Sigurd and the monster is actually a moment of parental bonding. There’s no fight or struggle to the death, there’s just two parents, communing, one of whom happens to be a MYTHICAL SEA BEAST. It’s completely ridiculous and a total fuck you to the audience that stuck out that snooze-fest build up. Jesus families, can’t we at least have horror movies without catering to your demands? We’ve already ceded holidays, superhero movies and chain restaurants. What more do you want?

Cinesnark also writes reviews for her own outlet. You can follow her on Twitter.




Paul Rudd's Ant-Man Looks Broody, and Ben and Jennifer's Adorable Ice Bucket Challenge | Eddie Vedder's Ice Bucket Challenge Is the Most Dad Ice Bucket Challenge of Them All






Are you following Pajiba on Facebook or Twitter? Every time you do, Bill Murray crashes a wedding.


Comments Are Welcome, Bigots and Trolls Are Not


  • Ricky, Bubbles & Julian

    when i saw Ragnarok, i thought this was an article about GWAR. damn you

  • F'mal DeHyde

    I saw a Norwegian movie on Netflix recently that I enjoyed, it's based on mythology as well... sort of.

    http://www.imdb.com/title/tt21...

  • foolsage

    I'd like to humbly submit "The Wackiest Wagon Train in the West" as a truly horrible movie. It's "Gilligan's Island" (very literally, even starring Bob Denver, with essentially the same characters) set in the Wild West. It didn't have to be terrible... hells, it could have just been a Western version of "Gilligan's Island" and I'd have given it a pass... but it's spectacularly bad. The "movie" is actually a mishmash of four episodes of a TV show called "Dusty's Trail" apparently, or so the internet would have me believe.

    I saw it many years ago but never forgot.

  • Luke

    What about Sleepwalkers? Or in that respect, how far till its so bad its good? (much like Drunk Cinema)

  • lunabelle

    In our house, bad movies generally get summed up with "well, it's no Teenage Caveman," a movie I barely remember but regularly hold up as the worst ever. I just looked it up, and in a very weird bit of synchronicity realized the star is Andrew Keegan.

  • Fabius_Maximus

    Ohhh, do "Kevin & Perry Go Large" next. You'll get bonus rubber points if you make it all the way through.

  • Sara_Tonin00

    Is that "Jesus families" or "Jesus, families" - because the guy in the header is looking kinda Messiah like. But I was also trying to figure out what Jesus families would go for a horror film based on pagan theology.

  • BlackRabbit

    Well pagans = heathens, and to most Jesus families that those people exist is horror.

  • Corvus

    Sigurd and the Sea Monster!

  • amberdragonfly

    Lake Placid may not the be the best movie ever, but Betty White kills me every time. I've seen it more times than I'd like to admit.

  • Hey, hey, hey. No badmouthing Anaconda or Lake Placid around here. Too many drunken nights ended laughing with those classics.

  • BWeaves

    OK, I thought this was going in a porno direction, because Lake Placid is wet and Anaconda is, um, snakelike, yeah, I'm going with that.

  • And because you're totally imagining a menage a trois featuring Jennifer Lopez, Nathan Fillion and Betty White?

  • BendinIntheWind

    They are both NATIONAL TREASURES

  • Drunk Cinema Classics presents, a special double-billing: Anaconda and Lake Placid!

blog comments powered by Disqus