web
counter
 

Dawson's Vineyard

By Brian Prisco | Posted Under Film Reviews | Comments (32)



125915_trailer-the-romantics.jpg

Contrary to popular belief, I fucking hate being right. When I go into a film, I’m not rooting against it. I want to like it. I hate wasting roughly two hours of my life on something that’s unenjoyable. When I saw the trailer for Galt Niederhoffer’s The Romantics, based on her novel of the same name, I compared it to masturbating to the L.L. Bean catalog. And that’s pretty much dead fucking on. This entire film is the L.L. Bean catalog: a bunch of rich, white, spoiled, overeducated, and melancholy twenty-thirty-whogivesafuckhowolds meet up at some Nantucket Nesters homestead for the wedding of two of their own. And sure, some of the performances are terrific, some are mediocre, and some are just plain ugly — just like the clothing in the old Bean. You might pause when flipping through because there are some brief moments that catch your eye. But you’d never actually spend money on that shit. You should not actually spend money on The Romantics. It’s a whole lot of empty sentimentality and boring cliches, spending way too much time on English Lit and not enough time having fun with the actual interesting people. Everything you expect to happen does. It’s the kind of DVD you’d bring to the home of a work acquaintance whose anecdotes require a second cup of coffee.

Do I really have to give a plot synopsis? Everyone’s got the kind of jobs you expect to have when you’re in your junior year of a liberal arts education: a PhD English candidate, a burgeoning actress, a published novelist, and a rich girl who lives on the family income. Of course, nobody’s happy. Everyone’s secretly miserable or depressed or harboring resentment. One couple’s married, one couple’s about to marry, one couple’s engaged, and one lonely girl is getting hit on by the creepy brother. They all used to fuck each other, and now kinda still want to. These are the kind of people who get their kicks stealing bottles of alcohol from an open bar and telling each other how dreadful and repulsive they look. Ugh, even now, rethinking the events of the movie I want to find a Scottish terrier decked out in a plain tartan and punt it into Narragansett Bay.

Anyway, Laura (Katie Holmes) used to be in a serious relationship with Tom (Josh Duhamel), who decided instead to marry the highstrung and emotionally void Lila (Anna Paquin). To pour vinegar in the wound (lemons aren’t grown in New England), they make her the maid of honor. They give a bunch of awkward wedding toasts on the night before, exposing why nobody else from their classes would be there, and why they presumably fucked only each other. They’re about as amusing as watching sandpipers fuck. After some reckless partying, Tom dives into the bay and swims away, and everyone searches for him. Jake (Adam Brody) ditches his fiancée Weesie (Rebecca Lawrence) to go search with the free spirited actress Tripler (Malin Akerman). Weesie ends up with Trip’s hubby Pete (Jeremy Strong), which leaves Laura with the pining brother of the bride, Chip (Elijah Wood). Guess what happens? Of course you did. Only you’re leaving out the part where Lila’s younger sister Minnow (Dianna Agron, Quinn from “Glee”) accidentally rips Lila’s dress after putting it on. Which would make sense if she was ten.

I don’t have the same disdain for Katie Holmes as most of the world, but she’s by far and away the weakest link on this chain. Whether it was the putrid material or not, Holmes has become so severe, she’s borderline Gyllenhaal. She looks like she’s about two frames away from melting like the Nazis at the end of Raiders of the Lost Ark. The rest of the cast does their damnedest, but Niederhoffer is intent on focusing on her tiresome and tedious speechifying, so even when they get their brief moments to shine, it’s all utterly overshadowed by two boring characters blaming each other for their breakup. Note to filmmakers: just because you have the characters walk to a new location doesn’t mean it’s necessarily a new argument or scene. Adam Brody is charming, Candice Bergen plays frosty WASP perfectionist like a fucking violin concerto, Rebecca Lawrence is building herself a nice little career, and Dianna Agron is cute. Malin Akerman works as a spoiled Hollywood tart. Jeremy Strong just has to show up at this point. Here’s hoping the kid gets more roles he can show himself off in, cause this sure as fucking shit ain’t it. Josh Duhamel is the perfect fucking twenty something male lead. If you need a preppy guy, or a solider just trying to get home to his baby, or a sales executive, or anything that really doesn’t require anything more than a placeholder that can say lines, he’s your man. That’s not a trashing of his abilities, he’s fucking perfect. Elijah Wood is triumphant as the drunken douchebag son. Too bad he sobers up by film’s end.

I don’t care enough about this film to talk about it anymore. It’s not bad enough to destroy or finish anyone’s careers. Nobody’s going to have to regret being in it. Hell, I don’t even think it’ll have that much detriment on Galt Niederhoffer. She should have maybe given the script to someone else to direct who could have given it a little bit of stylistic flair or something other than the flat delivery it received. It desperately wants to be this generations The Big Chill, or even St. Elmo’s Fire, but it’s too fucking boring.









Each Time You Like, Share, Tweet or Stumble a Pajiba Post, An Angel Does the Paul Rudd Dance



Pajiba Love 17/09/10 | Ben Affleck Career Assessment | A Chance to Take It to the Next Plateau









Comments

"just like the clothing in the old Bean"

______________

Is anyone else picturing a clitoris full of overpriced clothing?

Posted by: Kballs at September 17, 2010 1:06 PM

Chip? Weesie? Tripler? Minnow?

Die. All of you. Just die.

just because you have the characters walk to a new location doesn’t mean it’s necessarily a new argument or scene

Heh.

Nice, Priscotti.

Posted by: TK at September 17, 2010 1:09 PM

Perhaps "too fucking boring" is a sad, but honest indictment of this generation. We've outgrown the angst-ridden late twenties/early thirties perfected by Generation X, and don't have a particularly stellar future to step into hesitantly, hopefully, impetuously or otherwise.

That's an afterthought though, as all I could think of initially was why PhD English candidates always get such a bad rap. I swear we're not all That Person!

Posted by: muttley crew at September 17, 2010 1:15 PM

Yeah...it's bad, but inspired some great writing on your part. Sorry you had to go through it, but you know what? You have to suffer to make great art.

This post was great. Thanks.

Posted by: ChuckFilm at September 17, 2010 1:29 PM

Eh it looked pretty. Will probably bootleg it when I'm bored. I do love me some Adam Brody. He needs to get more work.

Posted by: grace b at September 17, 2010 1:31 PM

TK, you beat me to it. Can we make them die twice?

And nobody MAKES you be a maid of horror. You can always decline, "No thanks, I want to wear a pretty dress and sit in the back and fart."

Posted by: BWeaves at September 17, 2010 1:39 PM

I like most of the cast but this sounds like self-indulgent crap. It goes in the never-watch-not-even-on-TBS file.

I'm so tired of this idea that life is so boring now. Only rich white people think it's boring. Let me tell you, if you are in your 20s or 30's and that fucking bored and hating your perfect life do one of two things:

1) Kill yourself. Because you likely won't be all that missed.

2) Get involved. Do something for someone else without expecting anything in return. Just because you can. Practice being grateful.

God, flicks like this just raise my ire.

Posted by: TylerDFC at September 17, 2010 1:41 PM

just because you have the characters walk to a new location doesn’t mean it’s necessarily a new argument or scene

Sounds like someone went to the Tommy Wiseau school of directing.

Posted by: Courtney at September 17, 2010 1:58 PM

TK, I had the same thought. WTF with the names? I know WASPS are notorious for idiotic names/nicknames, but Minnow? Tripler? Your name should never be mistaken for the name of a car.

Rich + artsy-fartsy is not surefire formula for interesting.

Posted by: Wednesday at September 17, 2010 2:03 PM

Elijah Wood seems to be the only child star who managed to reach adulthood with a steady series of jobs in real movies. Even if the movie sucks, he usually gets a good review. There's never drama in his real life. Can someone please check with his mom and find out what she did right? And then bottle it, and sell it to the rest of the child actor crowd.

Posted by: BWeaves at September 17, 2010 2:12 PM

An excerpt from Niederhoffer’s biography on Wikipedia:

"She lives in New York City with her husband James Strouse, daughter Magnolia, and son Grover. She is the daughter of hedge fund manager Victor Niederhoffer and Gail Niederhoffer. She attended The Chapin School, Milton Academy and Harvard University."

Of course she wrote this fucking trite filth.

Posted by: Jenny at September 17, 2010 2:23 PM

So...it's basically that insipid movie Evening (don't get me wrong, I love Claire Danes, but really) re-set in the present? Wedding party full of angsty young people, set in upper-crust New England, romantic entanglements abound, someone disappears into the water? Meh.

Posted by: Rebecca at September 17, 2010 2:31 PM

And yet, when it comes on cable next February while Mr. PaddyDog is somewhere at a Superbowl party, I will watch it because I am obsessed with the New England coastline and the house porn that goes with it.

Posted by: PaddyDog at September 17, 2010 2:31 PM

Judging from the photo at the top, I thought this was a zombie movie.

I am heartily disappointed.

Posted by: Siege at September 17, 2010 2:35 PM

Amen, TylerDFC, Amen!

Posted by: Alarmjaguar at September 17, 2010 2:35 PM

You guys just don't understand great art. "Minnow" is her name because her character is alegorical to the petite fish. She posseses ichthyic characteristics such as glistening skin, wide eyes and a ravenous hunger for flecks of bread (itself analogous of cast off, misbegotten love). Minnows are typcially a fish used for bait, so when she rips her sister's dress she is "baiting" her sister's desperation and repressed anger, and driving the story towards it's inevitable "catch," the final showdown between the two ex-lovers.

"Tripler" is clearly a subtle homage' to the popular 1980's sitcom character, "Jack Tripper," who we know was involved in a precarious living situation with two members of the opposite sex. And since Jack Tripper himself was an homage' to Mary Shelly's little known follow up to "Frankenstein", specifically the tragic character Lionel Verney who must survive a contagion-caused apocalypse in "The Last Man," we can only assume that Tripler is a sophisticated alegory for the poisonous -- deseased, even -- results of multiple love interests. She must survive her own apocalypse, I suppose. *expressive sigh*

Posted by: superasente at September 17, 2010 2:43 PM

Grover? Really? I'd have gone with Kermit, or possibly Ernie for my pretentious child name-but Grover, that's going to pull in the chicks-you know if he can do the voice. She should have gone all the way and just named the kid Super-Grover.

Posted by: Mrcreosote at September 17, 2010 3:18 PM

Whenever I saw the trailer for this movie, I immediately thought of that jeans commercial that uses the Walt Whitman poem, and the Miracle Whip commercial.

Posted by: TarHeel at September 17, 2010 3:19 PM

The stupid names alone are making me not want to see this.

Posted by: Katie at September 17, 2010 3:36 PM

Oh, superasente, I heart you like I heart I Heart Huckabees.

Which is to say, enough not to ignore you, you hilarious mother effer.

Posted by: RobP at September 17, 2010 4:55 PM

And nobody MAKES you be a maid of horror. You can always decline, "No thanks, I want to wear a pretty dress and sit in the back and fart."

Posted by: BWeaves at September 17, 2010 1:39 PM

Thanks for that BWeaves. Best thing I have heard all day!


Posted by: bionic woman at September 17, 2010 5:18 PM

when I saw the trailers for this movie there was one thing that came to mind.

when i saw that this review was posted, i was interested to see if a) i was right and, b) how much of the review i'd have to read before i saw what i knew would had to be there.

It desperately wants to be this generation's The Big Chill, or even St. Elmo’s Fire, but it’s too fucking boring.

a) i was right.
b) although it was a well written review, this line could have been the lede, or even the entire review, and i could have saved myself five minutes.

Posted by: causaubon at September 17, 2010 5:51 PM

I watched Batman Begins again recently, and had forgotten that Katie Holmes was the original Rachel Dawes. I don't really follow her career, but it's crazy that she supposedly chose not to reprise her role in The Dark Knight.

Posted by: Turtle at September 17, 2010 6:52 PM

"Liv Tyler was originally cast as Laura, but was replaced by Katie Holmes, who also serves as the film's executive producer."

Because of course she is. Couldn't portray a corpse convincingly if she were dead, so let's make her part of the crew in charge of the whole danged operation too. I wonder if this was her down-payment for renting her womb out for another Xenu-spawn?

And by the way, did Holmes choose poorly selecting a grail, because she is looking damn haggard in that header pic.

Posted by: bleujayone at September 17, 2010 7:43 PM

And nobody MAKES you be a maid of horror. You can always decline, "No thanks, I want to wear a pretty dress and sit in the back and fart."

Unfortunately, that option isn't available when the bride is your sister... Damn it.

That header pic shocked me. I know it's old news that Katie Holmes is haggard, but wow. She looks beat.

Posted by: SaBrina at September 17, 2010 8:03 PM

(I did not see bleujayone's comment about her being haggard before I posted about it being old news that she's haggard, and I find this mildly amusing in a way that nobody else will.)

Posted by: SaBrina at September 17, 2010 8:11 PM

Tripler? Minnow?! I am going to allow Weesie since it reminds me of The Jeffersons. I suppose these are the nicknames of the Uber Wasps. And where I come from they would be Peaches or Snookie. But I got to those names and I just had to stop reading.

Posted by: greer at September 17, 2010 8:43 PM

MrCreosote, the Child Protective Services will have to roll by your place too after they find out I had a kid just so I can name him SuperGrover.

And if I am going to watch a bunch of privileged white people bitch and be miserable they had damn well be British and in period costume, thank you very much.

Posted by: Anne (in Reno) at September 18, 2010 12:44 AM

This is a tangent, but speaking of ridiculous names, Jamie Oliver just had a son, and named him Buddy Bear Maurice Oliver. WTF. His other kids:

Poppy Honey Rosie (born 18 March 2002), Daisy Boo Pamela (born 10 April 2003), and Petal Blossom Rainbow (born 3 April 2009); and son Buddy Bear Maurice (born 15 September 2010).

I'd say that a child of a celebrity has a limited chance of leading a conventional life, but you're not doing them any favors, Oliver.

Posted by: Cara at September 18, 2010 7:48 AM

I wonder if Jamie Oliver is a fan of "Bambi".

Posted by: snapnhiss at September 18, 2010 11:29 AM

This discussion got me mentally compiling some uberWASP names, no doubt to be used in my imaginary upcoming novel "Winter's Autumn: A Novel":

DUDEZ: Slate, Callaghan, Lowell, Cole, Trenton


CHIX: Cedar, Grayling, Wellesley, Saffron, Banyan, Spring, maybe?

And that image of Katie Holmes kind of breaks my heart.

Posted by: seeder at September 18, 2010 4:36 PM

My friend and I saw Catfish and afterward decided to see another movie. She suggested The Romantics.

- After perhaps 3 minutes of watching the movie, I turned to my friend and told her that I would not be staying for the entire film.

- Five minutes into the movie I told her that there is absolutely no way I would ever watch the entirety of the film and would be leaving very, very soon.

- Five minutes and 30 seconds into the movie I got up, said goodbye to my friend, and left the theater without a regret in the world.

Posted by: Littlejon2001 at September 19, 2010 1:00 AM