free counter with statistics The Reader Review | Pajiba - Scathing Reviews for Bitchy People

photo_04_hires.jpg
Some Stories Are True That Never Happened

The Reader / Ted Boynton

Film Reviews | January 9, 2009 | Comments (36)


Bernhard Schlink’s novel The Reader, an engaging meditation on the puzzling duality of human nature, makes a solid jump to the big screen in director Stephen Daldry’s film of the same name. In adapting Schlink’s book, Daldry (Billy Elliott) and screenwriter David Hare, who also worked with Daldry in adapting The Hours, successfully capture the complex, dark themes of the novel without engaging in rote exercise. While the film occasionally feels stiff and could have used a stronger editing hand to pare its two-hour length, Schlink’s brooding narrative never falters, and Daldry’s visual rendering strongly compliments Schlink’s conceptual foundation.

The Reader mines familiar ground for a surprisingly fresh idea in setting the tale of an older woman’s seduction of a teenage boy against the backdrop of the Nazi war crime trials in post-war Germany. In 1950s Heidelberg, fifteen-year-old Michael Berg (David Kross), nearly incapacitated by scarlet fever, stumbles into a courtyard where a woman helps him get home to his parents. After a long recovery Michael returns to thank her, finding an attractive but brusque and care-worn tram attendant named Hanna Schmitz (Kate Winslet). Following an awkward introduction, an attraction grows between the adoring teenager and the lonely recluse, and Hanna and Michael embark upon an affair, with Michael visiting Hanna’s flat each day after school to recite his literature assignments while they lounge in her bed after lovemaking. After several months of this arrangement, however, Hanna flees suddenly and without warning, leaving love-sick Michael to discover her empty apartment.

The Reader then jumps ahead several years, as Michael enters law school. As part of his studies relating to the ongoing trials of suspected Nazi war criminals, Michael learns to his horror that Hanna stands among the accused. As Michael sits in the courtroom, Hanna’s past is revealed through testimony from her and others, and he cannot reconcile his blind love with her horrible secret. Worse still, as the trial unfolds Michael realizes that he possesses information that could reduce Hanna’s criminal culpability, information Hanna inexplicably refuses to reveal to her interrogators.

Interspersed among the threads of the love affair and the trial, Ralph Fiennes plays grown-up Michael as a middle-aged man ruminating on the past amid the wreckage of a failed marriage. Fiennes tends to take himself too seriously, but his undeniable gift for wistful introspection is used well here. The flash-forwards to Fiennes, decades after his relationship with Hanna, could have been distracting with a less capable director but here provide an important perspective removed from the primary narrative. Contrasted against a callow youth raw with emotion, Fiennes’ older Michael offers an alternate viewpoint, an appreciation of how gaining maturity often involves learning that one’s most treasured lover may be capable of evil deeds.

David Kross is well-cast as teenage Michael, a gawky youth made of knees and elbows, but with keen eyes and a gentle manner. At times Daldry doesn’t give Kross quite enough to do, and Michael spends a fair portion of the middle of the film stalking through courthouses and university hallways with his hands to his head. Such quibbles don’t undermine his accomplishment of Job One, however, which is selling the idea that an attractive woman in her mid-thirties, even a fugitive who cannot risk normal adult relationships, might fall for him. Young Michael’s tender yet unflinching approach to Hanna bridges possibly the most difficult credibility gap in the story, and Kross makes a fine match for Winslet in their many scenes together.

Winslet delivers a predictably strong and nuanced performance, particularly in the early and middle portions of the film where Hanna is in her late 30s. Winslet has shed the cherub-naïf image of her early pictures and can stand shoulder to shoulder with the best actors of her time, but the production itself lets her down a bit in the end. As Hanna ages in the story, the filmmakers subject Winslet to some distracting make-up shenanigans, detracting from the film’s final act, most notably in a late scene shared with a very natural-looking Fiennes. The finest acting skills cannot overcome the reality that Kate Winslet, who was 32 during filming, does not look like an old woman, even under caked-on wrinkles. Winslet brings her formidable A-game, but The Reader might have been better served by a more physically mature actor — 44-year-old Juliette Binoche comes to mind — who could have played both younger and older without having to make an extreme jump either way.

Despite the occasional distraction, however, The Reader remains a satisfying experience for viewers who appreciate a thoughtful drama from a filmmaker unafraid to plumb the troubled depths of lost souls. Never shrinking from its characters’ failings, the film offers an unflinching view into grey areas of morality: Is it ever acceptable to forgive a horrific crime committed by a lover? Does ethical behavior require that one intervene to help a person who consciously refuses to help herself? Why is the seduction of a 15-year-old boy by a 36-year-old woman unremarkable in this context? This last question didn’t truly strike me until the movie was over, when it occurred to me that, throughout the film, Daldry makes no apology or excuse for Hanna’s sexual relationship with a teenager. Whether because it’s a boy with a woman, or because it was Europe in the 1950s, Daldry simply presents the event as something that occurred, leading to other events of greater import. Even more impressive is the film’s refusal to soften or explain away Hanna’s culpability for her role in the Nazi machine. In an era when unsympathetic protagonists are either spruced up by nervous studio executives or neutered by focus groups, Daldry and Hare admirably elect not to interfere with the tone and pitch of Schlink’s characterization.

As a result, The Reader surpasses expectations as a true adult drama. While it doesn’t belong in the discussion of Best Picture for 2008, a nomination for Supporting Actor (Fiennes) or Adapted Screenplay (Hare) shouldn’t be out of the question, and the film is well worth seeing.

Ted Boynton is a dedicated sot who plans to leave his barstool to stalk Whit Stillman, now that someone has found Whit Stillman. Ted also manages to hold down a job and a wife, three hours each per day, whether they need it or not. Readers may scold, hector, admonish or taunt Ted by e-mailing him at thecarygrantrules@hotmail.com.


Slammin Salmon Trailer | The Wordy Shipmates Book Review



Comments

Winslet isn't married to Daldry. She's married to Sam Mendes who, incidentally, directed her in the upcoming Revolutionary Road. Kate may have gotten that part because of the director, but this film is a different situation.

Gah. My bad. Noted and corrected. Merry X-Mas knowitalls! -- DR

Posted by: Toph at December 24, 2008 1:13 PM

I'm pretty sure Winslet isn't married to the director of this film either. She's married to Sam Mendes, who did the OTHER Kate Winslet film this month, Revolutionary Road.

Posted by: betty at December 24, 2008 1:13 PM

DAMN YOU TOPH

FOR BEING FASTER AT SELF-RIGHTEOUS CORRECTIONS!


Nice review by the way. This is definitely on my holiday-season-movie-watching list.

Posted by: betty at December 24, 2008 1:16 PM

I'm sorry! I thought this was a safe haven for knowitalls!!!

Since Betty brown nosed as well...I thought this was an excellent review as well. I've read others that dismissed the film as Oscar-grubbing, so I'm glad to read a good one. I can't wait to see which I actually agree with...

Posted by: Toph at December 24, 2008 1:19 PM

Ted, lovely review (as always). How do you always get to review the good flicks? You got naked pictures of Rowles or something?

I had read other meh things about this movie elsewhere, but I look forward to seeing it when it's released on dvd.

Merry Christmas, TB!

Posted by: Lainey at December 24, 2008 1:25 PM

Ugh, that little fact-check gremlin was all mine, Dustin's efforts notwithstanding. Fucking rotgut whiskey. tb

Posted by: ted boynton at December 24, 2008 2:45 PM

kate winslet is top three milfs in the world, she always gets naked,i love her!...merry christmas nerds!!!!

Posted by: pasadenamike at December 24, 2008 6:15 PM

I would watch Kate Winslet act in a ShamWow commercial.

Posted by: Dingles at December 24, 2008 11:39 PM

The ShamWow might steal the spotlight. Have you *seen* how much liquid it can hold?! (Not unlike Mr. Boynton...)

Posted by: Geetch at December 25, 2008 1:04 AM

Oh, is that Kate's luscious ass I see, so perfectly mounded in the background?

God, she is so beautiful and sexually enticing, womanly yet innocent, classy yet vaguely dirty and worldly, that my normal bisexual tendencies somehow get channeled into a bizarre desire to just like, hold her hand while we get pedicures or something.

And then she can act on top of everything? And she stays mostly tabloid-free? Sigh. If only I could rest my head on her boobies.

Posted by: heatdamaged at December 25, 2008 5:30 AM

Ralph Fiennes is still alive?

Who knew!

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at December 25, 2008 5:51 AM

Oh and Merry X-Mas..all of you who weren't hunted down and brutally murdered by "santa claus" aka Fat Kriss.

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at December 25, 2008 6:27 AM

Oh, is that Kate's luscious ass I see, so perfectly mounded in the background?

Uh, I think that's a pilow...

Posted by: PaleoLithchick at December 25, 2008 2:29 PM

Pillow, rather... damn spiked eggnog.

Posted by: PaleoLithchick at December 25, 2008 2:30 PM

Actually it was just last week that I saw the German book and there the title is the 'Vorleser' The reader who reads out loud. That's actually impossible to translate easily, hence the simplification, the reader.
I had to say I really disagreed with the moral dilemma as it was presented. Hanna has a big secret that (as stated) would prove her to be the least responsible of the 6 women guards. But she would rather keep her secret and accept major responsibility. And the reader has to decide whether to let her make that desicion or whether to blow her secret 'rescuing' her. HOWEVER this ignores the fact that by her taking on major responsibility, the other 5 guards basically get off scott free, and in fact the whole trial couldn't even have happened if Hannah hadn't identified herself and the other five guards, the testimony of the only two survivors wouldn't have been enough without Hannah's confirmation as to their identities and to the events.
This book does raise the same questions that were raised in the Good German (book). If a person is in an impossible situation, are they responsible for doing terrible things? In the good German (book) a Jew betrayed other Jews in hiding to survive. Here, people have taken jobs and wind up as a guard in a non death camp, sending some women to certain death every week. Does a cog in a machine of genocide have the same degree of moral culpability as a 'normal' murderer? Should you imprison all the cogs? Just the worst ones?

Posted by: ChrisD at December 26, 2008 7:11 AM

"Compliments": no.

"Complements": yes.

Carry on.

Posted by: Grammar Nazi at December 26, 2008 10:48 AM

Haven't read the review yet, but is that headline from The Things They Carried? That's one of my favorite books of all time.

Posted by: gatesong at December 26, 2008 11:35 AM

Also, Daldry is gay, as he himself declared at the Motovun film festival when presenting his boyfriend's movie - Friðrik Þór Friðriksson's Niceland (excellent movie by the way - maybe a review is in order around these parts so that more people can see it?).
Winslet is a hell of an actress and while she remains under the mainstream radar, she constantly pops up in fantastic movies. While all the make-up is over the top, her performance in the part of the movie where she plays a character of approximately her age is outstanding.

Posted by: marija at December 27, 2008 12:45 PM

Also, Daldry is gay, as he himself declared at the Motovun film festival when presenting his boyfriend's movie - Friðrik Þór Friðriksson's Niceland (excellent movie by the way - maybe a review is in order around these parts so that more people can see it?).
Winslet is a hell of an actress and while she remains under the mainstream radar, she constantly pops up in fantastic movies. While all the make-up is over the top, her performance in the part of the movie where she plays a character of approximately her age is outstanding.

Posted by: marija at December 27, 2008 12:47 PM

Also, Daldry is gay, as he himself declared at the Motovun film festival when presenting his boyfriend's movie - Friðrik Þór Friðriksson's Niceland (excellent movie by the way - maybe a review is in order around these parts so that more people can see it?).
Winslet is a hell of an actress and while she remains under the mainstream radar, she constantly pops up in fantastic movies. While all the make-up is over the top, her performance in the part of the movie where she plays a character of approximately her age is outstanding.

Posted by: marija at December 27, 2008 12:49 PM

Also, Daldry is gay, as he himself declared at the Motovun film festival when presenting his boyfriend's movie - Friðrik Þór Friðriksson's Niceland (excellent movie by the way - maybe a review is in order around these parts so that more people can see it?.
Winslet is a hell of an actress and while she remains under the mainstream radar, she constantly pops up in fantastic movies. While all the make-up is over the top, her performance in the part of the movie where she plays a character of approximately her age is outstanding.

Posted by: marija at December 27, 2008 12:50 PM

Hey, did you guys know that Daldry is gay?!

Posted by: PaleoLithchick at December 27, 2008 1:47 PM

No, I didn't! I also didn't realize that there are still folks out there on 56 baud modems.

Posted by: rikkitikkitavi at December 27, 2008 4:16 PM

Truly it is a thread of surprises.

Posted by: PaleoLithchick at December 28, 2008 12:15 AM

just caught this film and agree with much of the review. my only serious disagreement is the mention of fiennes as an oscar candidate. he was adequate but no more. kross was outstanding and winslet once again displays why she is the leading candidate to replace streep as the actress for all roles.

Posted by: snake at January 6, 2009 12:41 AM

I fucking love Kate Winslet. This is definitely on my top 10 movies of all time.

Posted by: jay at January 7, 2009 4:44 PM

Why is this review back at the top of the page?

Posted by: Tarn at January 9, 2009 7:24 AM

So more people can creepily mistake a pillow for an ass.

Posted by: PaleoLithchick at January 9, 2009 10:13 AM

This is a very very deep movie and the the actors left too much out. One cannot determine what Michael was thinking and why he acted the way he did. Like why did he turn back when he tried to see Hanna in the jail during the trial? Also, why did he not fully discuss the situation with his professor? And why did he not tell the court? Why was he so obsessed with providing her books on tapes, but lacked total emotion when he saw her in jail before her release? This behavior is quite bazaar. I am assuming the answer to all of these questions is simple - IT'S A MOVIE and not real life! The torment Michael endured for his silence is a reason he should have done something.

Hanna's suicide was quite predictable because it foretold in the classroom by one of Michael's classmates.

This movie brings to the forefront the question of how should we treat someone who we loved or liked very much and we later find out that they have a criminal background. Do we stop loving them? This movie put the audience in love with Hanna and then her dark past is revealed with a twist. Love Hanna, Hate Hanna or Justify her? Your choice...

I am going to read the book.

Posted by: MJ at January 11, 2009 9:31 PM

I thought this movie was grotesque and amoral. Hanna's crimes were heinous, yet the film attempts to engender sympathy for a Nazi. The plot is contrived and a pretentious effort to assuage German guilt. I hope it does not get best motion picture.

Posted by: Ellen at January 25, 2009 12:04 AM

I thought this movie was grotesque and amoral. Hanna's crimes were heinous, yet the film attempts to engender sympathy for a Nazi. The plot is contrived and a pretentious effort to assuage German guilt. I hope it does not get best motion picture.

Posted by: Ellen at January 25, 2009 12:06 AM

I thought a major theme of the movie was the effect that the affair had on Michael for the rest of his life. There are all kinds of examples these days of female teachers seducing their underage male students. Many males wish it had been them back in junior high. But the psychologists warn that such interactions are indeed unhealthy and cause long term emotional damage. The criminal codes say such behavior is criminal. This movie shows how such a relationship can seriously screw up a guy for
life. He was unable to have any successful relationships with other women, including his daughter.

Posted by: dave at January 27, 2009 7:51 PM

Oh, I love Kate very very much. She is really really sexy and the confidence she shows on screen even in full frontal scenes is awesome. A true actor.

Posted by: Abhi at February 13, 2009 5:22 AM

If this movie were about a 36 year old man seducing a 16 year old girl and he turned out to be a war criminal too, would we like the character?

Posted by: Bill at February 28, 2009 8:38 PM

I hate these "moral ambiguity" movies, that try to make it seem like people who were slaughtering other people didn't have a choice. Just that 15 yr old geek got his cheery popped by a hot piece of ass (yeah, like anyone in post-Hitler Germany looked like Winslet!), the murder of jews is supposed to be "forgiven"?
Fuck Hollywood. Somehow to them, they have crystal clear clarity on the Iraq war but ambiguity on the Holocaust. Hmmm... One wonders where their loyalties lie?
Pretentious bastards.

Posted by: Rick at March 1, 2009 5:44 PM

There is nothing to say about this fictional story. That is all it is. If you agree when Bruno Ganz's character says that civilization is about law not morality, then you will see this as a valid story. I agree with a person who said that nobody has the right to write fiction about the Holocaust, only survivors have that right. And I personally do not want that to include perpetrators or bystanders.

Posted by: Claire Dooley at March 9, 2009 12:01 PM