free counter with statistics The Men Who Stare at Goats Review | Pajiba - Scathing Reviews for Bitchy People

clooney-staring.jpg
Formulas Work. Damnit!


The Men Who Stare at Goats / Dustin Rowles

Film Reviews | November 6, 2009 | Comments (48)


Let’s admit this: We decry Hollywood formulism even as we embrace it. Go ahead: Think of your favorite movies, and explain to me how they’re not, in some way, formulaic. We need the guy to get the girl; the hero to beat the villain; the underdog to defeat the champion; and the pretty blonde to kill the boogeyman. Even movies we love because they subvert the formula work, in part, because they’re butting heads with formulism — they begin in a familiar place and veer off. They’re not subverting the formula so much as they’re taking the path less traveled: The guy loses the girl; the underdog gains only a moral victory; the villain becomes the hero; or the boogeyman murders all the pretty little blondes.

It’s not the formula we hate. It’s the predictability. It’s the lousy conceits. It’s the stupid plot contrivances. And it’s the annoying two-dimensional characters. But if you take out the lousy conceits, the predictability, the plot contrivances, and the poor character development, you’re still not going to have much of a movie if you don’t place it into one of the half-a-dozen existing formulas. Those formulas work, damnit. They’re tried and true, scientifically proven to prey upon our emotions. You can twist the formula, poke it, prod it, subvert it, flatten it out and stomp on it, but you still have to ride it. Otherwise, you’re going to be left with a flat, listless film that meanders aimlessly from one point to another and never really pushes any of your emotional buttons.

That’s the case here with Grant Heslov’s The Men Who Stare at Goats, a movie that never really goes anywhere, butts up against anything, or plays on our sympathies, our pre-existing notions, our sense of right or wrong, or our desire to see someone succeed or fail. It’s just a sequence of events that portend no task to complete up and until that task is being completed.

Granted, it’s a movie with excellent actors who turn in solid, if staid, performances. Ewan McGregor plays Bob Wilton, a Michigan reporter who decides — after his wife left him for the newspaper editor — to go out an uncover a story. Any story, really. And what better place than Iraq. There, he meets Lyn Cassady (George Clooney), a name Bob is familiar with because of an earlier story he investigated about a nutjob (Stephen Root) back in Michigan who claims that there was a secret psychic unit in the army that could stare animals to death and “remote view,” or use their minds to observe a distant place.

Lyn was something of the Master Jedi of this group (and there is a cute irony to the fact that Ewan McGregor is dealing with “Jedis” and “The Force,” a novelty that is lost after the 47th reference). He’s now retired, but claims to be working for a private contractor. He agrees to help Bob get into Iraq, although to what end is unclear and continues to remain so for most of the film. They crash their car; they’re abducted by Iraqis; they escape; and they continue on their road to an unknown destination.

Meanwhile, while all of this is happening, we’re also privy to the large backstory on the psychic unit that was created back in the ’80s to compete with an alleged Russian psychic unit. Mostly it involves Bill Django (Jeff Bridges) filling his unit with a lot of new-age, hippie ideas. The goal, apparently, was to use “peace and love” as weapons of war. It’s not until the very end of the movie, when that backstory converges with the present, that we understand the point of the entire film. Unfortunately, it’s not really a point worth understanding.

The notions behind The Men Who Stare at Goats are compelling in the abstract — a psychic military unit that explores the potential military application of new-age concepts. Unfortunately, it doesn’t actually translate into very compelling story. Screenwriter Peter Straughan was apparently intrigued by Jon Ronson’s non-fiction book of the same name, and decided to try his hand at writing a script around some of the material that Ronson uncovered, like the apparent facts that the military used the “Barney” theme song on prisoners-of-war and that special forces had smuggled hundreds of de-bleated goats into the country. But Straughan has a difficult time of trying to connect his two main characters’ inadvertent road trip to Ronson’s discoveries, and the result is messy and far-fetched. Moreover, Heslov — making his feature directing debut — plays it too straight to extract much comedy out of the situation, but not straight enough to make it a serious-minded examination of the unit.

But the worst part is, we don’t care about their journeys. It’s meant to be a movie about redemption, I suppose, but redemption from what is unclear. There’s no intriguing villain, either. Kevin Spacey is meant to fill that role, but his character is seriously underdeveloped, and we never get a real understanding for why we’re supposed to dislike him, other than the fact that most Kevin Spacey characters are unlikable. However, the biggest sin of The Men Who Stare at Goats is that there are no heroes, no real victories — literal or moral — and no ideas that are examined except in the most superficial kind of ways. The movie never gains any momentum; it just putters along until it finally runs out of gas.


One-Flick Wonders | The Fourth Kind Review



Comments

I'm absolutely crestfallen, how do you mess up a movie where George Clooney kills things with his brain, and Jeff Bridges plays a hippie?

Forget Where the Wild Things Are, forget Jennifers Body, this is the biggest disappointment of the year.

Posted by: George at November 6, 2009 3:15 PM

Shitshitshit! I really wanted this to be as fun as the trailers look.

oh, well, I'll see it anyway, if only for the chance to marvel at George's mustache and Kevin Spacey with hair plugs.

Posted by: dammitjanet at November 6, 2009 3:19 PM

How about if the boogeyman turns out to be the pretty blonde, the hero loses to the underdog and the villain wins the moral victory?

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at November 6, 2009 3:26 PM

Aw, dammit, this was one of the few movies I'd been looking forward to.

Posted by: Jerce at November 6, 2009 3:29 PM

That's just opposite day, B-Slim :p

Posted by: Julie at November 6, 2009 3:29 PM

George, the only place where Where the Wild Things Are was a disappointment was in your butthole.

Posted by: Optimus Rhyme at November 6, 2009 3:36 PM

Bummer.

Posted by: Cindy at November 6, 2009 3:50 PM

The Men Who Stare at Goats ...
And Then Fuck 'em

pervs

Posted by: L.O.V.E. at November 6, 2009 3:50 PM

What a dreadful, buttholey disappointment. I expected better.

Posted by: Smokin at November 6, 2009 3:55 PM

"like the apparent facts that the military used the “Barney” theme song on prisoners-of-war ..."

Now that is more horrifying than water-boarding. Or blasting a guy with a shotgun Damn, Cheney knew how to fuck dudes up.

Posted by: L.O.V.E. at November 6, 2009 3:56 PM

Damn those buttholes! Damn them to hell! And to think, they had the opportunity to explore the very real possibilities that men during a time of war become very sexually frustrated and staring at all these goats could become very problematic. Buttholes, indeed!

Posted by: James at November 6, 2009 3:57 PM

BarbadoSlim, have you seen Haute tension?
Because I think you just described it.

Posted by: Yossarian at November 6, 2009 4:02 PM

In what possible universe did anyone think this movie would be good? You can’t have pretty boy Clooney and a allegedly closeted Spacey in the same movie thinking you’re going to draw a large audience, the sexual tension just confuses everybody and you’re left with a small box office. If you’re a lady you can’t get hot over Clooney if the other male co-star you keep looking at allegedly likes taking it in the seat. When I saw the trailer I just knew this movie wouldn’t work.

Posted by: Guess Who! at November 6, 2009 4:04 PM

I'm sorry, did someone say they needed a boogeyman killed?

Posted by: Nicole at November 6, 2009 4:04 PM

I am noticing a butt theme today.

Even Cindy got into the act.

Bunch a fecalpheliacs
all up in the cracks

Posted by: L.O.V.E. at November 6, 2009 4:04 PM

Someone just pointed out that Spacey is "allegedly" gay.

and the analogy is now complete.

Posted by: L.O.V.E. at November 6, 2009 4:17 PM

Shame really, that the book by Jim Ronson, which the movies is based on, is actually a fun read.

Posted by: Swe.Ge at November 6, 2009 4:24 PM

After reading the book ,it is of no surprise that the film was a mish-mash of buttholey plotlessness, the book was a horrible mess of he said/she said without any real definitive direction... and it was really badly written too (kind of like this comment)

BUTTHOLE, BUTTHOLE, BUTTHOLE, BUTTHOLE, BUTTHOLE and BUTTHOLE

Posted by: tj at November 6, 2009 4:33 PM

I maintain that this will still be a flawed but wholly enjoyable film.

Posted by: laredo at November 6, 2009 5:27 PM

"but wholly" film

well played, laredo, well played

Posted by: L.O.V.E. at November 6, 2009 5:58 PM

Thanks. Like a balloon not fettered by a string to hold it down, I figured something this elementary can always be enjoyed, although my time would be better served by creating poetry or a fiscally responsible holiday gift list. I had a new series of puns that weren't bad as cracks like these go, but I knew that if I used them, I'd probably have wrecked them in the process.

Posted by: laredo at November 6, 2009 6:09 PM

laredo, that was the best butt crack I saw all day!

Posted by: meaux at November 6, 2009 7:03 PM

Well, I may have enjoyed it more than you did due to the fact that I got free passes to see it. . . but I still thought it was cute and fun.

Posted by: Jami at November 6, 2009 7:21 PM

I'm sure the series of puns came to you after careful analysis.

Ah, yes, the fissure between the ethereal and corporeal perspectives can be difficult to maneuver. It aint easy. Neither is cleaning stiitake mushrooms in a public place. But I digress.

Though you may think you would be better served reflecting on more substantive matters, you may find that, in retrospect, illuminating on this starry-eyed subject can fill an emptiness in your inner being.

Posted by: L.O.V.E. at November 6, 2009 7:37 PM

How odd. I just returned home from watching this, and honestly, Dustin, I can't see what the problem is.

The movie has a plot. It's just not a terribly predictable one; you are categorizing movies as either formulaic or rebelling against said formulas, but I see no reason why it needs to be so. Heck, I'm not even sure this movie ISN'T formulaic. I just need some time to digest it.

In short, I thought MacGregor played his role to a T; I thought Clooney was just as weird and delusional as previews suggested he would be; and if you didn't laugh at Spacey doing what he did to Clooney in that flashback at that crucial time, then I honestly don't know what can amuse you.

And you did love Jeff Bridges. Admit it. Dude just abided his way through the whole 90 minutes.

Posted by: J. K. Barlow at November 6, 2009 8:01 PM

I'm absolutely crestfallen, how do you mess up a movie where George Clooney kills things with his brain, and Jeff Bridges plays a hippie?

Um, make it in Hollywood? Buttholes.

Posted by: BierceAmbrose at November 6, 2009 10:42 PM

Further proof that this movie has gone full metal butthole

http://filmdrunk.uproxx.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/men-who-stare-sfw_crop.jpg

Posted by: L.O.V.E. at November 6, 2009 11:26 PM

Actually, I thought the book was a good, alternatively fun, alternatively disturbing read.

There was a bit of dialogue in it that I hope is in the movie (I haven't seen it.) Jon Ronson is talking to one of the main composers for Saseme Street, about how his music is being used to "soften up" Iraqi POWs.

Ronson: "And do you think that the Iraqi prisoners, as well as giving away vital information, are learning new letters and numbers?"

Composer: "Well, wouldn't that be an incredible double win?"

Posted by: kevin_m at November 7, 2009 10:43 AM

"However, the biggest sin of The Men Who Stare at Goats is that there are no heroes, no real victories — literal or moral — and no ideas that are examined except in the most superficial kind of ways. The movie never gains any momentum; it just putters along until it finally runs out of gas."

Loved reading your essay examining the ideal of formula. But it seems this film boils down to a boringly non-engaging storyline that meanders rather than develops with stylishly superficial performances. Now THAT's a formula I have come to recognize all too frequently, unfortunately.

Posted by: Patricia at November 7, 2009 11:50 AM

Uh-oh. I love the guy, but Clooney's creeping toward the point where people start talking about how he needs a "comeback." ("Leatherheads"? And I thought "Burn After Reading" was just so-so, and now this).

Or am I just being a butthole? (Hey, why not stretch it out for a weekend.)

Posted by: , (TCFKAB) at November 7, 2009 12:03 PM

You know what I just HATE about Butthole day?
After all of the merriment, the camaraderie, the gifts and feasting, there is the problem of what to do with all of the leftover Butthole.

Posted by: Lindsey with an 'e' at November 7, 2009 12:34 PM

You know what Clooney needs to do. He needs to make a seriously hot (and hilarious)Rom/Com with a gorgeous woman his own age. As opposed to one 25 years younger than him. Diane Lane anyone?

Posted by: Lindsey with an 'e' at November 7, 2009 12:43 PM

Or am I just being a butthole? (Hey, why not stretch it out for a weekend.)

TCFKAB, go ahead, test the limits of elasticity over the weekend...but those little guys don't really snap back into shape if you take it too far.

Posted by: Jiffyzen at November 7, 2009 1:09 PM

Jon Ronson's books tend to be meandering tales of investigation and discovery about bizarro things about the world. He neither examines his subject with a clinical, uberdetailed eye, nor does he assign a moral to his story. He hears a rumor, follows up on it as far as he can, then writes about what he experienced.

I haven't seen the movie yet, but it sounds like the movie follows the book closely enough that a lot of viewers won't get the point - he's just telling us what happened. It's real life. And in real life, not everybody gets the girl at the end, and there are no bad guys to tie to a stake.

My expectations are pretty low, but I"m still looking forward to seeing this movie.

Posted by: Tanya Miracle at November 7, 2009 1:20 PM

After all of the merriment, the camaraderie, the gifts and feasting, there is the problem of what to do with all of the leftover Butthole.

Posted by: Lindsey with an 'e' at November 7, 2009 12:34 PM

Um, I usually just flush the excess butthole down the toilet.

The important thing is that you clean up after yourself and that you don't litter people's front lawns with it.

Posted by: L.O.V.E. at November 7, 2009 3:50 PM

I haven't read Ronson's other books but I don't know... There seem to be a whole lot of bad guys to tie to the stake in Goats.

From the CIA sociopaths running the MK-ULTRA program in the 50s and 60s, to the Army sociopaths torturing prisoners in Iraq (applying new age techniques in all sorts of non-new agey ways), the book doesn't isn't short of black hats.

Posted by: kevin_m at November 7, 2009 4:03 PM

The heavenly aroma still hung in the house. But it was gone, all gone! No Butthole! No Butthole sandwiches! No Butthole salad! No Butthole gravy! Butthole Hash! Butthole a la King! Or gallons of Butthole soup! Gone, ALL GONE!

Posted by: laredo at November 7, 2009 8:20 PM

I think this thread deserves its own theme song.

I'm thinking "Tainted Love".

Or maybe "Butthole Surfer", "Backass" or "I Saw An X-Ray Of A Girl Passing Gas" by the Butthole Surfers.

But I do not approve of "Back That Ass Up" as the thread theme song.


Posted by: L.O.V.E. at November 8, 2009 12:26 AM

Honestly, it is threads like this that make it impossible for me to explain this site to normal people.
I love you Buttholes.

Posted by: Lindsey with an 'e' at November 8, 2009 3:53 AM

Who cares!!! My boyfriend also agrees with me. He is 10 years older than me, lol. We met online at age-gap club -- http://AgelessOnly.COM/. Maybe you wanna check out or tell your friends.

Posted by: Kyra at November 8, 2009 5:53 AM

You'll shoot your eye out, laredo.

Posted by: , (TCFKAB) at November 8, 2009 10:53 AM

Seeing as how this is Butthole Day or Week, I feel an obligation to repeat my original comment about this movie's trailer:

The Men Who Stare at Goatse.

Posted by: SaBrina at November 8, 2009 11:31 AM

Am I the only one that finds that header photo terribly amusing?

I am, aren't I.

Posted by: snapnhiss at November 8, 2009 12:49 PM

TCFKAB I think "You'll SHIT your eye out!"

Posted by: laredo at November 8, 2009 3:02 PM

At the end of the trailer for The Babies is the coolest and most menacing goat I've seen in the cinema this year. That trailer had more pure cinema in it than all of the summer blockbusters combined.

Posted by: laredo at November 8, 2009 3:13 PM

Saw the movie last night. I have got to wholly disagree with you on your judgment of the quality of the movie if not the assessment. It meanders because it was supposed to meander, the lead character was searching in his life...there's more to it than I really care to write but I would be willing to bet that you didn't like The Big Lebowski if you didn't like this film...

Peace

Posted by: Brian at November 8, 2009 6:52 PM

You're all missing the point. This movie is worth seeing for the presence of Stephen Mother-F'n Root.

With him, Clooney and Bridges, it's like the Coen brothers movie that never was.

Posted by: Daniel Hall at November 8, 2009 7:11 PM

As much as I love love love Ewan McGregor, I really wish directors would stop making him speak with an "American" accent. The only time it worked was Big Fish, when he had kind of a southern accent. The rest of the time he just sounds weird. The only people that would believe he sounds "American" aren't in North America.

Posted by: Jen at November 10, 2009 11:45 AM





Post a comment

 (required)

 (required)


Preview of your comment: